DOCSLIB.ORG

The Socialist Revolutionary Party

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Socialist Revolutionary Party oonn microfichemicrofiche ThThee SocialisSocialistt RevolutionarRevolutionaryy PartPartyy SerialSerialss andand MonographsMonographs A microfichmicrofichee collectiocollectionn ooff serialsserials andand monographsmonographs containincontainingg workworkss writtenwritten byby andand aboutabout well-knownwell-known leaderleaderss ooff ththee SocialisSocialistt RevolutionaryRevolutionary PartyParty (SR),(SR), asas wellwell asas publicationspublications dealingdealing withwith thethe partyparty itself.itself. AmongAmong thethe authors,authors, youyou willwill findfind thethe namesnames ofof Chernov,Chernov, Spiridonova,Spiridonova, Gershuni,Gershuni, Savinkov,Savinkov, andand manymany othersothers.. FurthermoreFurthermore,, thithiss collectiocollectionn containcontainss prominenprominentt newspapernewspaperss anandd journals journals publishepublishedd bbyy ththee SSRR iinn RussiRussiaa anandd abroad.abroad. HistorHistoryy ooff ththee SocialisSocialistt RevolutionarRevolutionaryy TheirTheir CombatCombat organizationorganization assassinatedassassinated aass ministeministerr ofof Justice.Justice. SavinkovSavinkov becamebecame PartPartyy a numbernumber ofof importantimportant officials,officials, AssistanAssistantt MinisteMinisterr ooff ththee ArmArmyy inin thethe includingincluding twotwo particularlyparticularly reactionaryreactionary seconsecondd coalitiocoalitionn government,government, a PartiiPartiiaa Socialistov-RevoliutsioneroSocialistov-Revoliutsionerovv (in(in ministersministers ofof thethe interior,interior, SipiaginSipiagin inin remarkablremarkablee carreecarreerr foforr oneone timtimee terroristterrorist RussianRussian,, abbreviateabbreviatedd ttoo `esery')'esery') 19021902 anandd PlevPlevee iinn 1904,1904, andand,, earlearlyy inin whwhoo beenbeen involveinvolvedd inin the the assassination assassination occupieoccupiess a speciaspeciall placplacee inin RussianRussian 1905,1905, GranGrandd DukDukee SergeSerge,, commandincommandingg ooff Pleve.Pleve. SavinkovSavinkov playedplayed alsoalso a centracentrall historyhistory.. TogetheTogetherr witwithh thathatt ofof thethe officerofficer ofof thethe militarymilitary regionregion aroundaround rolrolee iinn ththee KornilofKornilofff affair,affair, whichwhich MenshevikMenshevikss anandd thethe anarchists,anarchists, thisthis MoscowMoscow andand brother-in-lawbrother-in-law ofof TsarTsar maybemaybe moremore thatthat anythinganything elseelse preparedprepared historhistoryy belongbelongss ttoo ththee victimsvictims toto thethe leftleft NicolasNicolas II.II. Meanwhile,Meanwhile, a left-wingleft-wing ththee wawayy foforr thethe Bolsheviks,Bolsheviks, byby ooff ththee BolsheviksBolsheviks.. ThThee SRSR waswas formedformed spin-off,spin-off, ththee MaximalistsMaximalists,, pursuepursuedd a alienatinalienatingg botbothh ththee populatiopopulationn ooff inin 19011901 aass ththee resulresultt ofof thethe unificationunification terroristterrorist campaigncampaign againstagainst ththee statestate eveneven PetrogradPetrograd anandd ththee armarmyy fromfrom ooff variousvarious groupgroupss ofof neo-populistneo-populist moremore intenseintense thanthan thatthat ofof thethe SR.SR. InIn provisionaprovisionall government.government. tendenctendencyy formeformedd iinn thethe 1890s1890s withinwithin 19051905 ththee maimainn partpartyy advocateadvocatedd thethe Russia,Russia, anandd amonamongg expatriatesexpatriates abroad.abroad. formationformation ofof a ConstituentConstituent AssemblyAssembly In its early years it was a small, OverOver oneone milliomillionn membersmembers In its early years it was a small, andand supportedsupported universaluniversal suffrage.suffrage. heterogeneouheterogeneouss party,party, witwithh anan emigreémigré Nevertheless,Nevertheless, itit diddid notnot renouncerenounce leadership and underground A clearclear indicatioindicationn ofof thethe importancimportancee ooff leadership and underground terroristerrorismm aass aa meanmeanss foforr achievinachievingg thesthesee membership in Russia. After 'Bloody thethe SRSR waswas ititss membershimembershipp iinn 1917.1917. IItt isis membership in Russia. After `Bloody goals.goals. ItIt waswas onlyonly whenwhen iitt seemedseemed toto bebe estimatedestimated thathatt oveoverr ononee milliomillionn peoplepeople Sunday'Sunday' ofof thethe firstfirst RussianRussian revolution,revolution, makingmaking headwayheadway inin reachingreaching itsits aimsaims belongedbelonged toto thethe Party.Party. AAtt thethe electionselections 1905-1907,1905-1907, iitt expandeexpandedd intintoo a masmasss that,that, forfor a shortshort periodperiod betweenbetween OctoberOctober ofof thethe ConstituenConstituentt AssemblAssemblyy iinn movement.movement. anandd DecembeDecemberr 1905,1905, thethe partyparty NovemberNovember 1917,1917, thethe SSRR wowonn 444400 ououtt ooff InIn ththee shortshort perioperiodd ofof relativerelative freedomfreedom suspendedsuspended terroristterrorist actions.actions. WheWhenn ththee 700700 deputydeputy seatsseats anandd gainegainedd mormoree thathann betweenbetween 19051905 andand 1907,1907, thethe SRSR TsaristTsarist reformreformss didn'didn'tt meetmeet theirtheir 50% of the popular vote, whereas the exhibited all the characteristics which in 50% of the popular vote, whereas the exhibited all the characteristics which in expectations,expectations, thethe SRSR resumedresumed terroristterrorist BolsheviksBolsheviks electedelected 168168 deputies deputies andand 19171917 drovdrovee iitt intintoo disasterdisaster,, althougalthoughh iitt activitiesactivities andand boycottedboycotted thethe first DumaDuma polledpolled onlyonly 25%25% ofof the the popular popular vote.vote. initiallyinitially camcamee closeclose toto achievingachieving itsits elections.elections. ChernovChernov becamebecame presidentpresident ooff thisthis programme.programme. BeinBeingg a massmass movement,movement, ConstituentConstituent Assembly.Assembly. HoweverHowever,, iinn thethe SRSR waswas nevernever transformedtransformed intointo aa whawhatt cancan bebe consideredconsidered asas thethe secondsecond solidsolid politicapoliticall machine.machine. Rather,Rather, thethe BetweeBetweenn twtwoo revolutionsrevolutions andand definitivdefinitivee BolshevikBolshevik coup,coup, thethe partyparty operateoperatedd undeunderr ththee constanconstantt threathreatt IInn 19171917 thethe PSRPSR playeplayedd aann importanimportantt SovieSoviett governmentgovernment abandonedabandoned ththee ofof divisiondivision becausbecausee itit waswas oftenoften crippledcrippled rolerole inin thethe chaoticchaotic 88 monthsmonths fromfrom thethe ConstituentConstituent AssemblyAssembly onon 5 5 January January byby irresolvableirresolvable internalinternal conflicts.conflicts. InIn FebruaryFebruary revolutiorevolutionn (March(March 88 newnew 19181918.. SincSincee nnoo effectiveffectivee oppositiooppositionn 19061906 aa rightright winwingg groupgroup,, ththee PopulaPopularr calendarcalendar)) ttoo ththee OctobeOctoberr revolutiorevolutionn coulcouldd bebe organizedorganized againstagainst ththee SocialistsSocialists,, dididd indeeindeedd splintesplinterr offoff anandd (Novembe(Novemberr 6 newnew calendar)calendar).. IInn thithiss BolsheviksBolsheviks,, theythey ruledruled alone,alone, albeitalbeit inin a becamebecame ththee advocatesadvocates forfor a moderatemoderate perioperiodd ththee ProvisionaProvisionall governmentgovernment waswas countrycountry tormentedtormented byby civilcivil war.war. policpolicyy ooff cooperatiocooperationn witwithh ththee reformistreformist reorganisereorganisedd 44 timestimes.. ThThee firstfirst FollowingFollowing theirtheir breakbreak withwith thethe TsarisTsaristt regimeregime.. SomSomee followerfollowerss foforr Bolsheviks in March 1918, the Left governmengovernmentt startedstarted witwithh considerableconsiderable Bolsheviks in March 1918, the Left example,example, entereenteredd thethe secondsecond DumaDuma (the(the Socialist Revolutionaries instigated an PSPSRR supporsupportt anandd membershipmembership,, ththee forthforth Socialist Revolutionaries instigated an RussiaRussiann ParliamentParliament)) iinn 1907.1907. abortive uprising in Moscow in July. At endedended witwithh isolatedisolated AlexandeAlexanderr KerenskyKerensky abortive uprising in Moscow in July. At about the same time and partly as a aass ththee onlonlyy PSPSRR membememberr ooff hihiss laslastt responsabout thee tsameo this timeaction and, Bori partlys Savinko as a v TerroTerrorr cabinetcabinet.. ImportanImportantt PSRPSR figurefiguress whwhoo inciteresponsed a rebellio to this action,n in the Boris centr Savinkove of operateoperatedd iinn ththee firstfirst ProvisionaProvisionall Europeaincited an rebellion Russia, capturinin the centreg and ofholding TheThe SRSR resumeresumedd ththee terroristerroristt tactictacticss ooff governmengovernmentt besidesbesides KerenskKerenskyy (then(then European Russia, capturing and holding theitheirr predecessorpredecessorss sucsuchh aass ththee Minister of War) were Chernov as for two weeks the town of Yaroslavl on Minister of War) were Chernov as thfore twoVolga weeks. Thes thee effort towns ofcollapsed Yaroslavl, on "Narodnai"Narodnaiaa voliavolia"" (Will(Will ofof thethe People).People). MinisteMinisterr ofof AgricultureAgriculture and and PereverzevPereverzev the Volga. These efforts collapsed, 14 howeverhowever.. TruTruee ttoo theitheirr traditiontradition,, thethe SRSR slowlslowlyy increasedincreased pressurepressure onon ththee (Zagranichnai(Zagranichnaiaa Organizatsiia),Organizatsiia), whichwhich turnedturned toto terrorism,terrorism,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reassessing the Standard of Living in the Soviet Union: an Analysis Using Archival and Anthropometric Data
    IZA DP No. 1958 Reassessing the Standard of Living in the Soviet Union: An Analysis Using Archival and Anthropometric Data Elizabeth Brainerd DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES DISCUSSION PAPER January 2006 Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor Reassessing the Standard of Living in the Soviet Union: An Analysis Using Archival and Anthropometric Data Elizabeth Brainerd Williams College, CEPR, WDI and IZA Bonn Discussion Paper No. 1958 January 2006 IZA P.O. Box 7240 53072 Bonn Germany Phone: +49-228-3894-0 Fax: +49-228-3894-180 Email: [email protected] Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of the institute. Research disseminated by IZA may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit company supported by Deutsche Post World Net. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its research networks, research support, and visitors and doctoral programs. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. IZA Discussion Paper No.
    [Show full text]
  • Boris Kolonitskii, “'Democracy' in the Political Consciousness of The
    "Democracy" in the Political Consciousness of the February Revolution Author(s): Boris Ivanovich Kolonitskii Source: Slavic Review, Vol. 57, No. 1 (Spring, 1998), pp. 95-106 Published by: Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2502054 . Accessed: 17/09/2013 09:58 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Slavic Review. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.197.27.9 on Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:58:33 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions "Democracy" in the Political Consciousness of the FebruaryRevolution Boris Ivanovich Kolonitskii Historians of quite diverging orientations have interpreted the Feb- ruary revolution of 1917 in Russia as a "democratic" revolution. Sev- eral generations of Marxists of various stripes (tolk) have called it a "bourgeois-democratic revolution." In the years of perestroika, the contrast between democratic February and Bolshevik October became an important part of the historical argument of the anticommunist movement. The February revolution was regarded as a dramatic, un- successful attempt at the modernization and westernization of Russia, as its democratization.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolution in Real Time: the Russian Provisional Government, 1917
    ODUMUNC 2020 Crisis Brief Revolution in Real Time: The Russian Provisional Government, 1917 ODU Model United Nations Society Introduction seventy-four years later. The legacy of the Russian Revolution continues to be keenly felt The Russian Revolution began on 8 March 1917 to this day. with a series of public protests in Petrograd, then the Winter Capital of Russia. These protests But could it have gone differently? Historians lasted for eight days and eventually resulted in emphasize the contingency of events. Although the collapse of the Russian monarchy, the rule of history often seems inventible afterwards, it Tsar Nicholas II. The number of killed and always was anything but certain. Changes in injured in clashes with the police and policy choices, in the outcome of events, government troops in the initial uprising in different players and different accidents, lead to Petrograd is estimated around 1,300 people. surprising outcomes. Something like the Russian Revolution was extremely likely in 1917—the The collapse of the Romanov dynasty ushered a Romanov Dynasty was unable to cope with the tumultuous and violent series of events, enormous stresses facing the country—but the culminating in the Bolshevik Party’s seizure of revolution itself could have ended very control in November 1917 and creation of the differently. Soviet Union. The revolution saw some of the most dramatic and dangerous political events the Major questions surround the Provisional world has ever known. It would affect much Government that struggled to manage the chaos more than Russia and the ethnic republics Russia after the Tsar’s abdication.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Soviet Political Party Development in Russia: Obstacles to Democratic Consolidation
    POST-SOVIET POLITICAL PARTY DEVELOPMENT IN RUSSIA: OBSTACLES TO DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION Evguenia Lenkevitch Bachelor of Arts (Honours), SFU 2005 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS In the Department of Political Science O Evguenia Lenkevitch 2007 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY 2007 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name: Evguenia Lenkevitch Degree: Master of Arts, Department of Political Science Title of Thesis: Post-Soviet Political Party Development in Russia: Obstacles to Democratic Consolidation Examining Committee: Chair: Dr. Lynda Erickson, Professor Department of Political Science Dr. Lenard Cohen, Professor Senior Supervisor Department of Political Science Dr. Alexander Moens, Professor Supervisor Department of Political Science Dr. llya Vinkovetsky, Assistant Professor External Examiner Department of History Date DefendedlApproved: August loth,2007 The author, whose copyright is declared on the title page of this work, has granted to Simon Fraser University the right to lend this thesis, project or extended essay to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. The author has further granted permission to Simon Fraser University to keep or make a digital copy for use in its circulating collection (currently available to the public at the 'Institutional Repository" link of the SFU Library website <www.lib.sfu.ca> at: <http://ir.lib.sfu.ca/handle/1892/112>) and, without changing the content, to translate the thesis/project or extended essays, if technically possible, to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation of the digital work.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MENSHEVIKS in 1917 by Olegpmwkov Bachelor of Arts
    THE MENSHEVIKS IN 1917 r:. = BY OLEGpmwKOV Bachelor of Arts Moscow State Pedagogical Institute Moscow, USSR 1983 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS July 1992 THE MENSHEVIKS IN 1917 Thesis Approved: Thesis Advisor 0 Dean of the Graduate College 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express sincere appreciation to Dr. George F. Jewsbury and Dr. Joel M. Jenswold for their encouragement and advice throughout my graduate program. Many thanks also go to Dr. W. Roger Biles for serving on my graduate committee. Their suggestions and support were very helpful throughout the study. To Wann Smith for his expert typing and proofing skills; to Oscar Kursner for his help in translation. My wife, Y elaina Khripkov, encouraged and supported me all the way and helped me keep the end goal constantly in sight. Thanks go to her for her undivided time in the final stages of the project. She prov 1ded moral support and was a real believer in my abilities. 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. The Main Approaches to the Study of the Russian Revolution in American Historiography 2 The Study of Menshevism in the U.S. 6 Soviet Scholars on Menshevism 8 Sources 1 2 Themes and Problems 14 II. Tiffi "HONEYMOON' OF Tiffi REVOLUTION_~-~-~! 8 The Necessity for the Dual Power 1 8 The Essence and Structure of Dual Power 2 7 Establishing of the Revolutionary Defensists Policy3 5 III. THE APRIL CRISIS AND ITS CONSEQUENCES _____4 7 The First Clash.
    [Show full text]
  • Socialism in Europe and the Russian Revolution India and the Contemporary World Society Ofthefuture
    Socialism in Europe and II the Russian Revolution Chapter 1 The Age of Social Change In the previous chapter you read about the powerful ideas of freedom and equality that circulated in Europe after the French Revolution. The French Revolution opened up the possibility of creating a dramatic change in the way in which society was structured. As you have read, before the eighteenth century society was broadly divided into estates and orders and it was the aristocracy and church which controlled economic and social power. Suddenly, after the revolution, it seemed possible to change this. In many parts of the world including Europe and Asia, new ideas about individual rights and who olution controlled social power began to be discussed. In India, Raja v Rammohan Roy and Derozio talked of the significance of the French Revolution, and many others debated the ideas of post-revolutionary Europe. The developments in the colonies, in turn, reshaped these ideas of societal change. ian Re ss Not everyone in Europe, however, wanted a complete transformation of society. Responses varied from those who accepted that some change was necessary but wished for a gradual shift, to those who wanted to restructure society radically. Some were ‘conservatives’, others were ‘liberals’ or ‘radicals’. What did these terms really mean in the context of the time? What separated these strands of politics and what linked them together? We must remember that these terms do not mean the same thing in all contexts or at all times. We will look briefly at some of the important political traditions of the nineteenth century, and see how they influenced change.
    [Show full text]
  • The Azef Affair and Late Imperial Russian Modernity
    Chto Takoe Azefshchina?: The Azef Affair and Late Imperial Russian Modernity By Jason Morton Summer 2011 Jason Morton is a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at the University of California, Berkeley. “Petersburg streets possess one indubitable quality: they transform passersby into shadows.” -Andrei Bely “Now when even was come, he sat down with the twelve. And as they did eat, he said, Verily I say unto you, that one of you shall betray me. And they were exceedingly sorrowful, and began every one of them to say unto him, Lord, is it I? And he answered and said, He that dippeth his hand with me in the dish, the same shall betray me.” -Matthew 26: 20-23 Introduction: Azefshchina- What’s in a name? On January 18, 1909 (O.S.) the former Russian chief of police, A.A. Lopukhin, was arrested and his house was searched. Eleven packages containing letters and documents were sealed up and taken away. 1 Lopukhin stood accused of confirming to representatives of the Socialist Revolutionary Party that one of their oldest and most respected leaders, Evno Azef, had been a government agent working for the secret police (Okhrana) since 1893. The Socialist Revolutionaries (or SRs) were a notorious radical party that advocated the overthrow of the Russian autocracy by any means necessary.2 The Combat Organization (Boevaia Organizatsiia or B.O.) of the SR Party was specifically tasked with conducting acts of revolutionary terror against the government and, since January of 1904, Evno Azef had been the head of this Combat Organization.3 This made him the government’s most highly placed secret agent in a revolutionary organization.
    [Show full text]
  • FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS in the SOVIET UNION: a COMPARATIVE APPROACH * T~Omas E
    1967] FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN THE SOVIET UNION: A COMPARATIVE APPROACH * T~omAs E. TowE t INTRODUCTION The Soviet Constitution guarantees many of the same funda- mental rights as are guaranteed in the Constitution of the United States, plus several others as well. Indeed, these rights are described in greater detail and appear on their face to be safeguarded more emphatically in the Soviet Constitution. However, the mere existence of constitutional provisions for fundamental rights does not necessarily guarantee that those rights will be protected. Western scholars often point to discrepancies between rhetorical phrases in the Soviet Con- stitution and actual practices in the area of fundamental rights.' Soviet legal scholars insist, however, that such criticism should be aimed instead at Western constitutions. Andrei Vyshinsky has stated that it is precisely in the area of fundamental rights that "the contra- dictions between reality and the rights proclaimed by the bourgeois constitutions [are] particularly sharp." 2 Soviet legal scholars claim that bourgeois laws are replete with reservations and loopholes which largely negate their effectiveness in protecting fundamental rights generally, and those of the working man in particular.3 There is undoubtedly some truth in both claims, for, as Professor Berman has stated, "The striking fact is that in the protection of human rights, the Soviet system is strong where ours is weak, just as it is weak where ours is strong." 4 The full impact of this statement can only be understood by comparing the different approaches which * The author wishes to acknowledge the helpful comments and suggestions of Dr. Branko M.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolution in Russia and the Formation of the Soviet Union
    CLASSROOM COUNTRY PROFILES Revolution in Russia and the Formation of the Soviet Union The Russian Revolution often refers to two events that took place in 1917. The first, known as the February Revolution, forced Tsar Nicholas II to abdicate and led to the formation of a provisional government. During the second event, commonly known as the October Revolution or Bolshevik Revolution, Vla- dimir Lenin’s Bolshevik Party seized power and began seven decades of one-party rule. Some scholars and Soviet critics have argued that the second event was actually a coup by Lenin and his supporters and not a true revolution. The Russian Empire in 1914. Date confusion—The February Revolution actually In the early 1900s, cracks were beginning to appear in the tsar’s control took place in early March. Because the Russian Em- over the Russian Empire. An attempted revolution in 1905, which saw pire followed the Julian Calendar, which is 13 days mass worker strikes and peasant revolts, shook the monarchy and forced behind the Gregorian Calendar, the events are referred Tsar Nicholas II to implement political reform, including the establishment to as the February Revolution. Likewise, the October of a parliament and a new constitution. Revolution actually took place in early November. Reform temporarily quieted the unrest, but the new policies proved inef- Soviet—The word means “council” in Russian. Soviets fective and the parliament, known as the State Duma, was largely unable were workers’ councils made up of various socialist to override the Tsar’s decrees. parties at the end of the Russian Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Were the “Greens”? Rumor and Collective Identity in the Russian Civil War
    Who Were the “Greens”? Rumor and Collective Identity in the Russian Civil War ERIK C. LANDIS In the volost center of Kostino-Otdelets, located near the southern border of Borisoglebsk uezd in Tambov province, there occurred what was identified as a “deserters’ revolt” in May 1919. While no one was killed, a group of known deserters from the local community raided the offices of the volost soviet, destroying many documents relating to the previous months’ attempts at military conscription, and stealing the small number of firearms and rubles held by the soviet administration and the volost Communist party cell. The provincial revolutionary tribunal investigated the affair soon after the events, for while there was an obvious threat of violence, no such escalation occurred, and the affair was left to civilian institutions to handle. The chairman of the volost soviet, A. M. Lysikov, began his account of the event on May 18, when he met with members of the community following a morning church service in order to explain the recent decrees and directives of the provincial and central governments.1 In the course of this discussion, he raised the fact that the Council of Workers’ and Peasants’ Defense in Moscow had declared a seven-day amnesty for all those young men who had failed to appear for mobilization to the Red Army, particularly those who had been born in 1892 and 1893, and had been subject to the most recent age-group mobilization.2 It was at this moment that one of the young men in the village approached him to ask if it was possible to ring the church bell and call for an open meeting of deserters in the volost, at which they could collectively agree whether to appear for mobilization.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution and Transformation of the Soviet Elite*
    Evolution and transformation of the Soviet elite* Valery Lazarev Department of Economics, University of Houston, and the Hoover Institution E-mail: [email protected] Draft: April, 10, 2001 Introduction Radical social transformations are often represented as sets of policies that are consciously designed and implemented by selfless, benevolent - although probably ideologically biased - “experimenters.” Hence, titles of numerous books and papers referring to either “Soviet socialist experiment” or “Russia’s capitalist experiment.”1 The main problem of transition is, therefore, to design an optimal path from one sets of institutional arrangements to another, given the structural gap between the two. Under this approach, institutional elements are a passive material of social construction - or destruction - and the studies in institutional inheritance have no relevance. This is arguably not true even in the context of the most abrupt revolutionary change. Institutions do not exist per se, they are borne by people, economic - or in a broader setting, political-economic - agents who are selfish and rational. Whatever changes they opt to go for, they do it not for the love of abstract enlightened policies but to maximize their own objective functions. In addition, these agents are boundedly rational: their ability to collect and process information, i.e. to solve problems, is limited, and so is their possible speed of adaptation to new conditions. They acquire social and human capital – skills, beliefs, and patterns of behavior, as well as identity and reputation – through a lengthy process of socialization under “ancienne regime.” They bring this luggage into the brave new world, even if they arrive into it in a revolutionary-romantic manner, on a top of tank.
    [Show full text]
  • Lenin, (Just) Wars of National Liberation, and the Soviet Doctrine on the Use of Force
    Journal of the history of International Law 19 (2017) 219–245 JHIL brill.com/jhil Lenin, (Just) Wars of National Liberation, and the Soviet Doctrine on the Use of Force Johannes Socher* Research Associate, German Research Institute for Public Administration Berlin, Germany [email protected] Abstract Today, the prohibition of the use of force is universally accepted as a norm of custom- ary international law. Nevertheless, several exceptions are discussed in international law scholarship. One of them, wars of national liberation, originates in Lenin’s socialist war theory and was subsequently maintained by the former Soviet doctrine of inter- national law. Little known in western academia, this Soviet argument of national lib- eration struggles to be ‘just wars’ is still alive in Russian international law scholarship today, and, therefore, a lasting legacy of Lenin’s theory of wars of national liberation in international legal discourse as developed around the time of the Russian Revolution (even if sometimes ignored) may be conceded. Keywords Lenin – wars of national liberation – Soviet doctrine of international law – use of force, prohibition of – just war theory * Where English translations of Russian works were not available, German translations are cited instead and used as intermediates. These, as well as all ‘direct’ translations from German and Russian into English are the author’s. I would like to thank Bill Bowring, Lauri Mälksoo, and Marija Peran for providing equally helpful comments. My gratitude also goes to Bruno Simma for discussing the topic with me and reading an earlier draft of this article. Any mistakes or inaccuracies are, of course, solely my own.
    [Show full text]