Current status of direct dark matter detection experiments

Jianglai Liu,1 Xun Chen,1 and Xiangdong Ji1, 2, 3, ∗ 1INPAC, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Shanghai 200240, China 2Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai, China 3Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA (Dated: accepted 13 Jan. 2017, published 2 Mar. 2017) Much like ordinary matter, dark matter might consist of elementary particles, and weakly inter- acting massive particles are one of the prime suspects. During the past decade, the sensitivity of experiments trying to directly detect them has improved by three to four orders of magnitude, but solid evidence for their existence is yet to come. We overview the recent progress in direct dark matter detection experiments and discuss future directions.

Almost a century ago, astronomers suggested the exis- ical models predict that this cross-section is smaller than tence of a hypothetical dark matter, invisible in the en- 10−42 cm2 for nearly all possible WIMP masses, yielding tire electromagnetic spectrum. To date, the dominance of an extremely low signal rate, which in turn requires an dark matter and its role in driving the evolution and land- extraordinarily low background environment for detec- scape of our universe have become the standard paradigm tion. To suppress the background produced by cosmic in cosmology [1]. On the galactic scale, astronomers rays, all the direct detection experiments are located in believe that our galaxy is surrounded by an extended deep underground laboratories. The residual background and diffusive dark matter halo [2,3]. Microscopically, also includes neutrons and gamma rays from the environ- weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), with typ- ment and detectors. Passive shielding and, in some cases, ical masses around the electroweak symmetry breaking active veto are required to suppress the external back- scale (100 GeV/c2), are a generic class of dark matter ground, and high-purity detector components are a must candidates favoured by many theories beyond the Stan- to minimize the more dangerous internal backgrounds. dard Model of particle physics [4], such as supersymmetry The ultimate irreducible background comes from solar (SUSY). The production and annihilation of such parti- and atmospheric neutrinos. The uncertainty in neutrino- cles in the early thermal universe could naturally explain nucleus coherent scattering eventually limits the sensitiv- the abundance of regular matter observed today – an ap- ity of the direct detection experiments [11–13]. pealing scenario known as the WIMP miracle. Another popular particle dark matter candidate is the For a WIMP mass between 1 and 1,000 GeV, the typ- axion, an extremely light bosonic particle originally intro- ical elastic recoil energy of an atomic nucleus ranges duced to explain the so-called charge-parity (CP) symme- from 1 to 100 keV (for a large nucleus, the smaller the try in the strong interaction [5,6]. The extremely small WIMP mass, the lower the mean recoil energy and vice coupling of axions to electromagnetic radiation and reg- versa), which is the primary signal in direct detection. ular matter (such as electrons and nucleons) would allow WIMPs can in principle scatter off electrons, but the re- them to be detected in ground experiments [7]. How- coil energy would be suppressed further by the electron ever, no positive signals have shown up so far (see ref. [8] mass and hence would require a more sensitive detec- for a recent review). WIMPs, on the other hand, have tion technology [14]. The nuclear recoil energy can be finite weak coupling with regular matter. They could converted into thermal motion (phonons), ionization, or be detected via their elastic scattering off matter (direct scintillation photons through the Coulomb field of the detection), in high-energy collisions (collider searches), charged nucleus [15]. For example, semiconductor de- or via their annihilation into normal particle-antiparticle tectors can detect the electrons from the ionization of pairs (indirect detection) [9]. In recent years, significant a heavy ion, and when operating at very low tempera- arXiv:1709.00688v1 [astro-ph.CO] 3 Sep 2017 experimental progress has been made in the direct detec- tures, the same detector can be used as a bolometer to tion of WIMPs, which is the focus of this short review. measure the phonons produced by atomic collisions. Ex- Direct detection experiments are designed to detect periments that simultaneously detect two types of signals the nuclear recoil in the scattering of galactic WIMPs are typically more powerful in differentiating nuclear re- off target nuclei. The signal rate depends on the lo- coil signals against electron recoil backgrounds from ra- cal density and velocity distribution of WIMPs in the dioactivity. Other features of the signals, such as the Milky Way (astrophysical inputs with non-negligible sys- timing shape, can sometimes also be used for background tematic uncertainties), the WIMP mass, and the interac- discriminations. To compare the results from different tion cross-section of the target nuclei [10]. Most theoret- experiments, the standard assumption is that WIMPs scatter coherently and elastically off all nucleons in the nucleus, and the interaction has neither nuclear spin nor a proton-neutron dependence. To date, apart from a few ∗ Corresponding author: [email protected] controversial claims [16–19], no solid WIMP signal has 2

been observed in a direct detection experiment. How- -37 10 ever, these placed tight constraints on various theoreti- 10-38 cal models. Figure1 summarizes the current leading di- PandaX-II 2016 10-39 LUX 2016

rect detection limits on spin-independent WIMP-nucleon ) 2 cross-section versus the mass of the WIMPs. Overlaid in 10-40 CDMSLite 2015 CRESST-II 2015 the figure are the WIMP search sensitivity limited by the -41 10 neutrino background [20], and the representative minimal -42 supersymmetric model contours (2σ) constrained by Run 10 1 at the Large Hadron Collider [21]. In what follows, we 10-43 Post LHC1 mSUSY constraint review some of the progress made by a few representative 10-44 experiments. 10-45

Detectors made of noble liquids are spearheading 10-46 WIMP searches in the ∼100 GeV/c2 mass range. The 10-47

so-called dual-phase XENON10 collaboration [22], have SI WIMP-nucleon cross section (cm developed into the state-of-the-art detection technol- 10-48 ogy and have been pushing the elastic spin-independent 10-49 Neutrino coherent scattering

WIMP-nucleon scattering sensitivity in a wide range of 10-50 WIMP masses above 5 GeV/c2 (refs [23–26]). Natural 1 10 102 103 WIMP mass (GeV/c2) xenon does not have long-lived radioactive isotopes, ex- cept for 136Xe, whose double-beta decay has a negligible contribution to the current generation of experiments. FIG. 1. Upper limits on the spin-independent (SI) WIMP- Liquid-xenon targets allow for a relatively straightfor- nucleon scattering cross-section set by current leading exper- ward scaling-up to large monolithic detectors. In a liquid- iments. The limit curves are from PandaX-II[26], LUX [30], xenon time-projection chamber, with two arrays of pho- SuperCDMS (CDMSLite) [48] and CRESST-II [55]. The neu- tomultiplier tubes located at its top and bottom and with trino coherent scattering background curve data is from ref. a large electrical field across the liquid-gas interface, the [20] and the post-LHC-Run1 minimal-SUSY model allowed prompt scintillation photons can be detected along with contours are from ref. [21]. the electroluminescence in the gas, produced by the ion- ization electrons drifted to and extracted from the liquid surface. This technique provides excellent vertex recon- detectors at the hundreds-kilogram level, the background struction, enabling a powerful target fiducialization and due to uniformly distributed sources such as 85Kr, 222Rn a good discrimination between the nuclear recoil signals and 220Rn already becomes prominent, and the effective and the electron recoil background [27]. suppression of such a background for the next generation At present, there is a tight ongoing race between a of experiments is under intensive research and develop- few xenon experiments. LUX [28], a 250-kg xenon ex- ment. Looking into the near future, the XENON1T [34] periment, located in the Sanford Underground Research experiment, the successor of XENON100, is commission- Facility (SURF) [29], USA, started taking physics data in ing its dual-phase detector with a 2-ton liquid-xenon tar- 2013, and recently concluded in May 2016. By combining get. The minimum projected sensitivity on the WIMP- the 95 live days of data taken in 2013 and another 332 nucleon cross-section can reach 2.0 × 10−47 cm2 at 50 live days of data taken from 2014 to 2016, the collabora- GeV/c2 with an exposure of 2.2 ton-year [34]. The tion reported a minimum of 1.1 × 10−46 cm2 upper limit upgrade experiment XENONnT, with a 6.5-ton liquid- at a WIMP mass of 50 GeV/c2 on the WIMP-nucleon xenon target, is in planning. The successor of LUX, cross-section [30]. This is the strongest reported limit to LZ [35], will contain a 7-ton liquid-xenon target, and is date. The best published WIMP search limit is set by the expected to start operation in 2020 to achieve a sensi- half-ton scale PandaX-II [31] experiment located in the tivity of 3 × 10−48 cm2 at 40 GeV/c2 with 1,000 live JinPing underground Laboratory (CJPL) [32] in China. days of data. In China, a future 4-ton scale experiment, This is also the largest running dual-phase xenon detector PandaX-4T, and its follow-up PandaX-30T are planned in the world. The results were obtained with an exposure in the second phase of CJPL. Another future large direct of 3.3 × 104 kg-day, with an unprecedented background detection project, DARWIN, is aiming at a target mass level of 2×10−3 events kg−1d−1keV−1 within the electron up to 40-ton [36]. equivalent energy region between 1.3 and 8.7 keV. The The XMASS [37] experiment, in the Kamiokamine in lowest limit for the cross-section was set at 2.5 × 10−46 Japan, uses an alternative single-phase liquid-xenon de- cm2 at a WIMP mass of 40 GeV/c2 (ref. [26]). PandaX- tector to search for WIMPs by detecting only the scintil- II will continue data taking until 2018. The XENON100 lation photons [29]. The detector has an approximately experiment located in the Gran Sasso National Labora- spherical shape with a nearly 4π photodetector cover- tory (LNGS) in Italy recently reported their final WIMP age. One major challenge for such a detector is to cor- results using a total of 477 live days of data with a limit rectly reconstruct event vertices to have an unambigu- of 1.1 × 10−45 cm2 at 50 GeV/c2 (ref. [33]). For these ous fiducial volume selection. After discovering a signif- 3 icant background from the photodetectors, which could leading limits published on low-mass WIMPs between 1.6 ‘leak’ into the central region due to mis-reconstruction, and 5.5 GeV/c2 (ref. [48]). The CDEX [49] experiment the photodetector array was replaced and the experiment located in CJPL used point-contact germanium detectors resumed data taking in 2014 [38]. The next stage for operating at liquid nitrogen temperature. These detec- XMASS is XMASS 1.5 (ref. [39]), a detector with 5 tons tors have also the advantage of a low threshold and a of xenon in the full volume. The projected sensitivity good rejection power to surface background, and hence will reach 10−46 cm2 for 100GeV/c2 WIMPs. are suitable for low-mass WIMP searches. The first stage Argon is another type of noble element widely used in CDEX-I experiment was completed with a 915-g detec- direct detection experiments with a primary focus on the tor at 475 eV threshold with final exposure of 335.6 kg- high-mass WIMPs. In comparison to xenon, due to its days [50]. With no sign of unusual events, the CDEX-I low cost, even a few hundred-ton future detector is fore- results challenged the WIMP interpretation of the event seeable. The DarkSide-50 (ref. [40]) experiment located excess from the CoGENT experiment which pioneered in LNGS is running a dual-phase argon detector. The the technology [51]. An improved 1-kg CDEX detector first physical result of DarkSide-50 with atmospheric ar- with an even lower threshold is currently taking data. gon was reported in 2015 [41]. It demonstrated excellent The DAMIC [52] experiment is another direct dark pulseshape discrimination of the background electron re- matter search at SNOLAB. It uses high-resistivity coil events. For detectors using natural argon, 39Ar is an charge-coupled detectors (silicon) to record both the am- irreducible long-lived cosmogenic background. To tame plitude and position of the ionization signal created by this background, DarkSide collaboration pioneered the the nuclear recoil. The experiment is particularly sensi- underground argon extraction and showed that the 39Ar tive to WIMPs with low mass in the range 1∼20 GeV/c2. levels can be reduced by a factor of 1.4 × 103 (ref. [42]). Results from the 0.6 kg-day exposure data taken in At the next stage, DarkSide-20k (ref. [43]), a detector 2016 [53] provided an upper limit for the elastic spin- with 20-ton of argon, is expected to reach a sensitivity independent WIMP-nucleon cross-section below 10−39 of 9 × 10−48 cm2 at 1 TeV/c2 with a 100 ton-year ex- cm2 for WIMPs with masses larger than 3 GeV/c2. posure. DEAP-3600 (ref. [44]) at SNOLAB [29] in Sud- Another low-mass WIMP search experiment is bury, Canada is another argon-based experiment with a CRESST [54], located in LNGS. CRESST uses CaWO4 1-ton target. It is operating in the single-liquid phase crystal modules operated at an extremely low temper- by detecting scintillation photons. Pulseshape discrimi- ature (10 mK) to detect both thermal excitations and nation will be used to identify the electron recoil back- scintillations resulting from the nuclear recoils. The ground, which from a smaller prototype detector [45] CRESST-II experiment, which concluded in 2015, is cur- has been proven to have less than 2.7 × 10−8 back- rently leading the exclusion limit below a mass of 1.5 ground contamination. Presently, DEAP-3600 is being GeV/c2, and has extended below 1 GeV/c2 for the first commissioned [46]. Like DarkSide, DEAP-3600 aims to time [55]. eventually use underground argon extraction to suppress Most of the projects discussed above have planned up- 39Ar. The projected sensitivity on the spin-independent grades to improve their sensitivities,. At the next stage WIMP-nucleon scattering cross-section can reach 10−46 SuperCDMS will be moved to SNOLAB, and it is pro- cm2 for WIMP masses of 100 GeV/c2 with a 3 ton-year jected to start operation in 2020. With an exposure of exposure [44]. 100 kg-year of Ge and 14.4 kg-year of Si with mixed An important frontier is the search for lighter WIMPs iZIP and HV mode, the SuperCDMS experiment is an- in the range of a few GeV/c2 which would produce a ticipated to approach the ultimate neutrino background lower recoil energy. Aside from the standard background for WIMP masses in the range between 0.5 and 7 GeV/c2 issues common to all direct searches, a key issue in such (ref. [56]). Also at SNOLAB, the upgraded DAMIC100 experiments is the operation of the detectors at a very experiment with 100 g of target mass is upcoming. In low threshold, hundreds of eV or lower. The Super- China, the CDEX-10 with a total target mass of 10 kg is CDMS [47] experiment located in the Soudan [29] mine in being prepared with an improved low-energy threshold. Minnesota, USA uses cryogenic semiconductor detectors, At LNGS, the newly designed CRESST-III experiment armed with the so-called interleaved Z-sensitive ioniza- started commissioning in June 2016, and a low thresh- tion phonon (iZIP) technique to detect both the phonon old below 100 eV is expected [57]. In fact, such lower and ionization signals at a low temperature of ∼40-50 threshold experiments are opening up new opportunities mK. The technology provides a factor of greater than to detect sub-GeV WIMPs via the very low energy elec- 106 rejection of the electron recoil background relative to tron recoil signals in addition to the nuclear recoil signals. the nuclear recoil background. The collaboration pub- Besides existing technologies, new experimental concepts lished results in 2014 with 15 iZIP modules, each with a are being discussed and developed [58]. mass of 0.6 kg (ref. [47]). To reach a lower threshold, one Despite the heated competition in searching for signs of the iZIP detectors was operated with a relatively high of spin-independent (scalar) WIMP-nucleon scattering, bias voltage (HV) to convert the ionization signal into WIMPs could well carry spin and interact with nucle- phonons, which reached an electron recoil threshold of 56 ons through spin-dependent interactions. At SNOLAB, eV. With a 70 kg-day exposure, the experiment set the the PICO [59] experiment is looking for spin-dependent 4

WIMPs signals with the bubble chamber technique. In such superheated liquid detectors, only nuclear recoil -38 10 events with large enough stopping power can produce PandaX-II 2016 nucleation to critically sized bubbles, which can then be ) photographed. Currently, PICO is operating two cham- 2 LUX 2016 bers. One is called PICO-2L with 2.9 kg of C3F8. An- other one, PICO-60 (ref. [60]), is the largest bubble cham- -39 ber used in dark matter search to date, and was filled 10 with 36.8 kg of CF3I in run 1 and C3F8 in run 2. Due to the odd number of protons in 19F and the fact that the last unpaired proton dominates the overall spin of 19F, PICO has excellent sensitivity to spin-dependent WIMP-proton scattering. In fact, the most recent result 10-40 of PICO-2L provided the most stringent direct detection constraints on such cross-sections for WIMP masses of less than 50 GeV/c2(ref. [61]). The leading experiments SD WIMP-neutron cross section (cm searching for the WIMP-neutron interaction are again using liquid xenon, relying on the fact that two of its 10-41 129 131 10 102 103 natural isotopes, Xe and Xe, carry odd numbers WIMP mass (GeV/c2) of neutrons. The lowest published cross-section limit is 9.4×10−41 cm2 at 33 GeV/c2 from the LUX collaboration with a total of 1.14 × 104 kg-day exposure [62]. More re- FIG. 3. Upper limits on the spin-dependent WIMP-neutron scattering cross-section set by diferent xenon-based experi- cently, the PandaX-II experiment reported a record limit ments. Limit curves from LUX [62] and PandaX-II [63]. of 4.1 × 10−41 cm2 at 40 GeV/c2 in a preprint [63]. The current limits set on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon scat- tering cross-sections by different experiments are shown in Fig.2 (proton) and Fig.3 (neutron).

or even break the ultimate neutrino background limit.

10-36 Active research and development is being pursued glob- PandaX-II 2016 ally in the direction of solid and gaseous detectors, to

LUX 2016 demonstrate their ability to identify recoil tracks and the )

2 scalability to a significant target mass [64]. PICO 10-37 To summarize, we presented a non-exhaustive survey PICO-2L of the recent progress in direct detection WIMP exper- iments. Although there has been no solid evidence of a 10-38 real event yet, the currently operating experiments are expected to enhance their search sensitivity, and may have the opportunity to first detect a real WIMP signal. In the next decade or so, future experiments are plan- -39 10 PICO-60 ning to push the search sensitivity in spin-independent SD WIMP-proton cross section (cm WIMP-nucleon interaction to the irreducible neutrino background in almost the entire WIMP range. The present status and future reach of this very competitive 10-40 10 102 103 field is illustrated in Fig.4. Should a future observation WIMP mass (GeV/c2) be made in one experiment, a robust discovery would require confirmation from other experiments, preferably FIG. 2. Upper limits on the spin-dependent (SD) WIMP- with different experimental techniques and different tar- proton scattering cross-section set by diferent experiments. get materials, as well as cross checks from indirect and The limit curves are from LUX [62], PandaX-II [63], and collider searches (for example, see SUSY contours from PICO [60, 61]. Figs1 and4). This calls strongly for a worldwide multi- faceted programme for dark matter detection. Finally, Finally, to prove the astrophysical nature of the one cannot ignore the importance of those null searches WIMPs requires measurements of the angular correlation which have been setting tighter constraints to many the- between the recoil signals and the galactic rotation. Rel- oretical models and which may eventually direct us on evant experimental techniques can also be applied to fur- a completely different path towards understanding this ther reject both electron and nuclear recoil backgrounds, mysterious component of our Universe. 5

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 10-37

-38 10 PandaX-II 2016 10-39 LUX 2016 ) 2 10-40 CDMSLite 2015 CRESST-II 2015 10-41

10-42

-43 10 SuperCDMS Post LHC1 mSUSY constraint 1700 kg-days 10-44

10-45

10-46 PandaX-4T 6 t-y 10-47 XENON1T 2 t-y LZ 15.6 t-y

SI WIMP-nucleon cross section (cm XENONnT 20 t-y 10-48 200 t-y xenon (DARWIN or PandaX-30T) 10-49 Neutrino coherent scattering

10-50 1 10 102 103 WIMP mass (GeV/c2)

This work is supported by grants from the Na- FIG. 4. The projected sensitivity (dashed curves) on the spin- tional Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11435008, independent WIMP-nucleon cross-sections of a selected num- ber of upcoming and planned direct detection experiments, 11455001, 11505112 and 11525522), a grant from the including XENON1T [34], PandaX-4T, XENONnT [34], Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. LZ [35], DARWIN [36] or PandaX-30T, and SuperCDMS [56]. 2016YFA0400301), and in part by the Chinese Academy Currently leading limits in Fig.1 (see legend), the neutrino of Sciences Center for Excellence in Particle Physics ‘floor’ [20], and the post-LHC-Run1 minimal-SUSY allowed (CCEPP), the Key Laboratory for Particle Physics, As- contours [21] are overlaid in solid curves for comparison. The trophysics and Cosmology, Ministry of Education, and different crossings of the experimental sensitivities and the Shanghai Key Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cos- 2 neutrino floor at around a few GeV/c are primarily due to mology (SKLPPC). Finally, we thank the Hong Kong different threshold assumptions. Hongwen Foundation for financial support.

[1] G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, Phys. Rept. 405, [14] A. Dedes, I. Giomataris, K. Suxho, and J. D. Vergados, 279 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0404175 [hep-ph]. Nucl. Phys. B826, 148 (2010), arXiv:0907.0758 [hep-ph]. [2] C. Savage, K. Freese, and P. Gondolo, Phys. Rev. D74, [15] R. J. Gaitskell, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 54, 315 (2004). 043531 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0607121 [astro-ph]. [16] R. Bernabei et al., Eur. Phys. J. C73, 2648 (2013), [3] G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski, and K. Griest, Phys. arXiv:1308.5109 [astro-ph.GA]. Rept. 267, 195 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9506380 [hep-ph]. [17] C. E. Aalseth et al. (CoGeNT), Phys. Rev. D88, 012002 [4] M. C. Smith et al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 379, 755 (2013), arXiv:1208.5737 [astro-ph.CO]. (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0611671 [astro-ph]. [18] G. Angloher et al., Eur. Phys. J. C72, 1971 (2012), [5] R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 arXiv:1109.0702 [astro-ph.CO]. (1977). [19] R. Agnese et al. (CDMS), Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 251301 [6] F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 279 (1978). (2013), arXiv:1304.4279 [hep-ex]. [7] J. E. Kim, Phys. Rept. 150, 1 (1987). [20] J. Billard, L. Strigari, and E. Figueroa-Feliciano, Phys. [8] D. J. E. Marsh, Phys. Rept. 643, 1 (2016), Rev. D89, 023524 (2014), arXiv:1307.5458 [hep-ph]. arXiv:1510.07633 [astro-ph.CO]. [21] E. A. Bagnaschi et al., Eur. Phys. J. C75, 500 (2015), [9] J. M. Gaskins, Contemp. Phys. 57, 496 (2016), arXiv:1508.01173 [hep-ph]. arXiv:1604.00014 [astro-ph.HE]. [22] J. Angle et al. (XENON), Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 021303 [10] J. D. Lewin and P. F. Smith, Astropart. Phys. 6, 87 (2008), arXiv:0706.0039 [astro-ph]. (1996). [23] E. Aprile et al. (XENON100), Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, [11] L. E. Strigari, New J. Phys. 11, 105011 (2009), 021301 (2013), arXiv:1301.6620 [astro-ph.CO]. arXiv:0903.3630 [astro-ph.CO]. [24] D. S. Akerib et al. (LUX), Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 091303 [12] A. Gutlein et al., Astropart. Phys. 34, 90 (2010), (2014), arXiv:1310.8214 [astro-ph.CO]. arXiv:1003.5530 [hep-ph]. [25] D. S. Akerib et al. (LUX), (2015), arXiv:1512.03506 [13] F. Ruppin, J. Billard, E. Figueroa-Feliciano, and L. Stri- [astro-ph.CO]. gari, Phys. Rev. D90, 083510 (2014), arXiv:1408.3581 [26] A. Tan et al. (PandaX-II), Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 121303 [hep-ph]. (2016), arXiv:1607.07400 [hep-ex]. 6

[27] E. Aprile and T. Doke, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2053 (2010), Torino, Italy, September 7-11, 2015, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. arXiv:0910.4956 [physics.ins-det]. 718, 042016 (2016). [28] D. S. Akerib et al. (LUX), Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A704, [44] P. A. Amaudruz et al. (DEAP), Proceedings, 37th In- 111 (2013), arXiv:1211.3788 [physics.ins-det]. ternational Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP [29] D. Mei and A. Hime, Phys. Rev. D73, 053004 (2006), 2014): Valencia, Spain, July 2-9, 2014, Nucl. Part. Phys. arXiv:astro-ph/0512125 [astro-ph]. Proc. 273-275, 340 (2016), arXiv:1410.7673 [physics.ins- [30] D. S. Akerib et al. (LUX), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 021303 det]. (2017), arXiv:1608.07648 [astro-ph.CO]. [45] P. A. Amaudruz et al. (DEAP), Astropart. Phys. 85, 1 [31] A. Tan et al. (PandaX), Phys. Rev. D93, 122009 (2016), (2016), arXiv:0904.2930 [astro-ph.IM]. arXiv:1602.06563 [hep-ex]. [46] N. Fatemighomi (DEAP-3600), in 35th International [32] K. J. Kang, J. P. Cheng, Y. H. Chen, Y. J. Li, M. B. Symposium on Physics in Collision (PIC 2015) Coven- Shen, S. Y. Wu, and Q. Yue, Proceedings, 11th Inter- try, United Kingdom, September 15-19, 2015 (2016) national Conference on Topics in astroparticle and un- arXiv:1609.07990 [physics.ins-det]. derground physics in Memory of Julio Morales (TAUP [47] R. Agnese et al. (SuperCDMS), Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 2009): Rome, Italy, July 1-5, 2009, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 241302 (2014), arXiv:1402.7137 [hep-ex]. 203, 012028 (2010). [48] R. Agnese et al. (SuperCDMS), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, [33] E. Aprile et al. (XENON100), Phys. Rev. D94, 122001 071301 (2016), arXiv:1509.02448 [astro-ph.CO]. (2016), arXiv:1609.06154 [astro-ph.CO]. [49] K.-J. Kang et al. (CDEX), Front. Phys.(Beijing) 8, 412 [34] E. Aprile et al. (XENON), JCAP 1604, 027 (2016), (2013), arXiv:1303.0601 [physics.ins-det]. arXiv:1512.07501 [physics.ins-det]. [50] W. Zhao et al. (CDEX), Phys. Rev. D93, 092003 (2016), [35] D. S. Akerib et al. (LZ), (2015), arXiv:1509.02910 arXiv:1601.04581 [hep-ex]. [physics.ins-det]. [51] C. E. Aalseth et al. (CoGeNT), Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, [36] J. Aalbers et al. (DARWIN), JCAP 1611, 017 (2016), 131301 (2011), arXiv:1002.4703 [astro-ph.CO]. arXiv:1606.07001 [astro-ph.IM]. [52] J. Barreto et al. (DAMIC), Phys. Lett. B711, 264 (2012), [37] A. Minamino (XMASS), Technology and instrumentation arXiv:1105.5191 [astro-ph.IM]. in particle physics. Proceedings, 1st International Con- [53] A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (DAMIC), Phys. Rev. D94, ference, TIPP09, Tsukuba, Japan, March 12-17, 2009, 082006 (2016), arXiv:1607.07410 [astro-ph.CO]. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A623, 448 (2010). [54] M. Bravin et al. (CRESST), Astropart. Phys. 12, 107 [38] K. Abe (XMASS), Proceedings, Workshop on Neutrino (1999), arXiv:hep-ex/9904005 [hep-ex]. Physics : Session of CETUP* 2015 and 9th Interna- [55] G. Angloher et al. (CRESST), Eur. Phys. J. C76, 25 tional Conference on Interconnections between Particle (2016), arXiv:1509.01515 [astro-ph.CO]. Physics and Cosmology (PPC2015): Lead/Deadwood, [56] R. Agnese et al. (SuperCDMS), Phys. Rev. D95, 082002 South Dakota, USA, July 6-17, 2015, AIP Conf. Proc. (2017), arXiv:1610.00006 [physics.ins-det]. 1743, 050001 (2016). [57] R. Strauss et al., Proceedings, 14th International Confer- [39] K. Ichimura, Proceedings, 34th International Cosmic Ray ence on Topics in Astroparticle and Underground Physics Conference (ICRC 2015): The Hague, The Netherlands, (TAUP 2015): Torino, Italy, September 7-11, 2015,J. July 30-August 6, 2015, PoS ICRC2015, 1223 (2016). Phys. Conf. Ser. 718, 042048 (2016). [40] A. Wright (DarkSide), in Proceedings, 13th ICATPP [58] J. Alexander et al. (2016) arXiv:1608.08632 [hep-ph]. Conference on Astroparticle, Particle, Space Physics [59] C. Amole et al. (PICO), Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 231302 and Detectors for Physics Applications (ICATPP 2011): (2015), arXiv:1503.00008 [astro-ph.CO]. Como, Italy, October 3-7, 2011 (2012) pp. 414–420. [60] C. Amole et al. (PICO), Phys. Rev. D93, 052014 (2016), [41] P. Agnes et al. (DarkSide), Phys. Lett. B743, 456 (2015), arXiv:1510.07754 [hep-ex]. arXiv:1410.0653 [astro-ph.CO]. [61] C. Amole et al. (PICO), Phys. Rev. D93, 061101 (2016), [42] P. Agnes et al. (DarkSide), Phys. Rev. D93, 081101 arXiv:1601.03729 [astro-ph.CO]. (2016), [Addendum: Phys. Rev.D95,no.6,069901(2017)], [62] D. S. Akerib et al. (LUX), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 161302 arXiv:1510.00702 [astro-ph.CO]. (2016), arXiv:1602.03489 [hep-ex]. [43] S. Davini, P. Agnes, and D. Franco (DarkSide), Pro- [63] C. Fu et al. (PandaX-II), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 071301 ceedings, 14th International Conference on Topics in (2017), arXiv:1611.06553 [hep-ex]. Astroparticle and Underground Physics (TAUP 2015): [64] F. Mayet et al., Phys. Rept. 627, 1 (2016), arXiv:1602.03781 [astro-ph.CO].