DOCSLIB.ORG

Support Title X and Family Planning

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Support Title X and Family Planning Support Title X and Family Planning Betty A. Chewning, PhD, University of Wisconsin; Lawrence M. Leeman, MD, MPH, University of New Mexico; Sarah S. Brown, MSPH, National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy; and Ellen Wright Clayton, MD, JD, Vanderbilt University September 2012 Family planning is one of the 10 greatest The views expressed in this commentary are public health achievements of the 20th cen- those of the authors and not necessarily of the tury, according to the Centers for Disease authors’ organizations or of the Institute of Medi- cine. The commentary is intended to help inform Control and Prevention (1999). Nearly 75 and stimulate discussion. It has not been sub- percent of women of reproductive age in the jected to the review procedures of the Institute of United States (64 million) receive at least Medicine and is not a report of the Institute of one family planning or related medical ser- Medicine or of the National Research Council. vice annually (Mosher et al., 2004). A re- markable consensus has emerged within the These Title X funds support programs scientific and health care communities about that provide contraceptive services and the value of reproductive health care and broadly promote reproductive health by, for evidence-based guidelines to shape its deliv- example, providing cancer screening and ery. Three Institute of Medicine committees, treatment of sexually transmitted infections as well as many medical societies and other (STIs). By law, no Title X funds may be professional health associations, have en- used for abortion. dorsed the adoption of evidence-based In 2010, Title X grantees provided care guidelines for family planning care. to 5 million individuals, of whom 89 percent One of the most visible and important (4.7 million) were below 200 percent of the public-sector investments in family planning federal poverty level (FPL) and 69 percent is the federally funded Title X program, were at or below 100 percent of the FPL. which has a long history of providing evi- Two-thirds were uninsured; one-quarter dence-based, cost-effective family planning were under age 20, with another quarter be- care. Begun during the Nixon administration tween ages 20 and 24 (OPA, 2011). In inter- in 1970, Title X’s mission is to provide views with programs receiving Title X fund- grants to public or nonprofit private entities ing, staff members throughout the country to “assist in the establishment and operation reported that they use Title X funds to serve of voluntary family planning projects which clients who otherwise would not have been shall offer a broad range of acceptable and able to get care. Title X also provides educa- effective family planning methods and ser- tion and guidelines for clinicians about best vices (including natural family planning practices in the field (IOM, 2009).This key methods, infertility services and services for federal program is led by the Office of adolescents)”—primarily for the benefit of Family Planning within the Department of low-income individuals. Health and Human Services (HHS). This *Participants in the activities of the IOM Standing Com- mittee on Family Planning. Copyright 2012 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. office not only performs a range of adminis- things, requires new insurance plans to cov- trative tasks associated with the Title X pro- er, without copay or deductible, preventive gram, but is also a center of expertise and services including well-woman visits, wisdom within HHS and the nation on the screening for gestational diabetes, testing for rich and evolving field of family planning HPV (human papillomavirus), counseling care. for STIs, counseling and screening for HIV Despite its achievements and broad pub- (human immunodeficiency virus), contra- lic support for family planning (PAI, 2011), ceptive methods and counseling, breast feed- Title X has faced opposition and challenges ing support, supplies and counseling, and since its inception, coming under attack screening and counseling for domestic vio- from vocal members of the public and from lence. As important as these provisions are, members of Congress and the executive there is universal agreement that a subset of branch. Recently, some members of the the population will not be covered by the House of the Representatives have sought to ACA insurance provisions—that is, there defund or eliminate Title X (New York will still be a number of uninsured people— Times, 2012). Some have argued that tax which means that Title X will continue to be dollars should not be used to fund family important. For example, a study evaluating planning at all (Tamari, 2010). At times, po- Massachusetts’ sweeping health care reform, litical appointees who oversee the Title X which is quite similar to the ACA, found program have lacked relevant medical, pub- that while the Massachusetts plan enhanced lic health, or family planning experience family planning access for many women, (Lee, 2006, 2007). some had difficulty maintaining continuous Despite the criticisms, the mandated re- insurance enrollment, securing timely ap- sponsibilities of Title X programs have con- pointments, managing prescriptions and tinually expanded. Funding, however, has high costs, and determining which health lagged in the last 15 years, while the number care providers accepted the plan and had the of people who need care, the complexity of desired contraceptives (Dennis et al., 2012). their health problems, and the cost of care Title X’s decades of experience in deliv- have all grown significantly. Thanks to sci- ering high-quality family planning care of- entific advances, there have been dramatic fers the new systems supported by the ACA improvements in contraception (especially a wide range of expertise and many oppor- the current generation of long-acting re- tunities for learning. Evidence already sug- versible contraceptives) and in the preven- gests that many of the family planning ser- tion and detection of STIs—both of which vices provided in this country do not meet are needed by many of the clients served the high standards of care promoted by Title through Title X (Winner et al., 2012). The X (Park et al., 2012). For this reason, Title X initial costs of these newer methods are should be viewed not only as a key part of more than offset by their greater effective- the service delivery system but also as a cen- ness in helping to plan and space pregnan- ter of excellence in education and training cies and preventing infections (Chesson et that is well positioned to help other health al., 2012; Sonnenberg et al., 2004; Trussel et systems (especially those offering primary al., 2009). care) promote evidence-based family plan- Title X is complemented but not re- ning services. Together, these complemen- placed by the Patient Protection and Afford- tary programs can enhance access to the able Care Act (ACA). The ACA emphasizes health services needed to screen for and treat evidence-based care and, among other STIs, plan and space pregnancies, and ad- 2 dress health conditions such as gestational Fletcher, J., and B. L. Wolfe. 2009. Education and diabetes which may interfere with healthy labor market consequences of teenage childbear- ing: Evidence using the timing of pregnancy out- births. These efforts have the additional comes and community fixed effects. Journal of benefits of cost savings for the broader Human Resources 44(2). health care system as well as averting the Fletcher, J., and B. L. Wolfe. 2012. The effects of lasting consequences of unplanned and/or teenage fatherhood on young adult outcomes. adolescent pregnancies (Crissey, 2006; 2012. Economic Inquiry 50(1):182-201. IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2009. A review of the Fletcher and Wolfe, 2009, 2012; Joyce et al., HHS family planning program: Mission, man- 2000). agement and measurement of results. Washing- For these reasons, there should be a ton, DC: The National Academies Press. strong commitment to providing evidence- Joyce, T. J., R. Kaestner, and S. Korenman,. 2000. based family planning services for both The effect of pregnancy intention on child devel- opment. Demography 37(1):83-94. women and men. This commitment should Lee, C. 2006. Bush choice for family planning post include specific support for criticized. Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp- adequately funded Title X programs that dyn/content/article/2006/11/16/AR20061116019 promote state-of-the-art reproductive 29.html (accessed September 20, 2012) Lee, C. 2007. Birth-control foe to run office on fami- health care nationally and provide ser- ly planning. Washington Post. vices to those who remain uninsured, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp- have difficulty accessing needed contra- dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR20071016017 ception, and/or are uncomfortable re- 62.html (accessed September 20, 2012) ceiving family planning services through Mosher, W. D., G. M. Martinez, A. Chandra, J. C. Abma, and S. J. Willson. 2004. Use of contra- other sources; and ception and use of family planning services in insurance coverage for the delivery of the United States: 1982-2002. Advance Data key reproductive health services mandat- from Vital and Health Statistics 350:1-46. ed in the Affordable Care Act. New York Times. 2012. Republicans vs. women. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/30/opinion/rep ublicans-vs-women.html?_r=0 (accessed July 30, 2012). References: OPA (Office of Population Affairs). 2011. Family Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1999. planning annual report, 2010 national summary. Ten great public health achievements: United http://www.hhs.gov/opa/pdfs/fpar-2010-national- States, 1900-1999. Morbidity and Mortality summary.pdf (accessed August 20, 2012). Weekly Report 48(12):241-243. PAI (Population Action International). 2011. Review Chesson, H. W., D. U. Ekwueme, M. Saraiya, M. of polling on family planning. Watson, D.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Title X Family Planning Program
    Updated November 5, 2019 Title X Family Planning Program Overview fertility awareness-based methods) and services (including The Title X Family Planning Program (Title X) was infertility services, information about or referrals for enacted in 1970 as Title X of the Public Health Service Act adoption, and services for adolescents).” The 2019 rule also (PHS Act). It provides grants to public and nonprofit states that family planning methods and services include, agencies for family planning services, research, and for example, choosing not to have sex, preconception training. The U.S. Department of Health and Human counseling, general reproductive and fertility health care, Services (HHS) administers Title X, which is the only and “the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infections domestic federal program devoted solely to family planning and diseases which may threaten childbearing capability or and related preventive health services. the health of the individual, sexual partners, and potential future children.” Title X does not fund prenatal care In March 2019, HHS published in the Federal Register a directly, but the 2019 rule requires Title X projects to final rule that prohibits Title X projects from referring provide prenatal care referrals for all pregnant clients. clients for abortion as a method of family planning, and it requires physical and financial separation between Title X Does Title X Fund Abortions? Since the program’s projects and certain abortion-related activities, among other establishment in 1970, the PHS Act has prohibited using changes to Title X regulations. (CRS In Focus IF11142, Title X funds in projects where abortion is a method of Title X Family Planning Program: 2019 Final Rule.) family planning (42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Democrats From
    MEMORANDUM To: Senate Democrats From: Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, Democratic Staff Re: Public Comments in Opposition to the Trump-Pence Administration’s Title X Gag Rule Date: March 7, 2019 The Title X program, first implemented in 1970 by President Richard Nixon, has historically enjoyed bipartisan support in Congress. As recently as the 115th Congress, Republicans and Democrats in the Senate voted for appropriations language that ensured the Title X program would continue to operate as it did under the Obama Administration. In 2016 alone, Title X- funded health centers provided four million women, men, and adolescents with a wide range of basic health care including birth control, cancer screenings, sexually transmitted diseases (STD) tests, and more at nearly 4,000 health centers. It is a vital source of reproductive health care for women who may otherwise struggle to access and afford the care they need. Despite the critical role Title X plays in delivering wanted and needed care to millions of men and women, and despite the bipartisan support it regularly receives, Title X has been the target of the Trump-Pence Administration for nearly two years. In April 2017, President Trump signed legislation overturning important protections that limited states’ ability to block Title X funding for Planned Parenthood and other qualified providers that specialize in women’s health. The Trump-Pence Administration then delayed the funding announcement for the 2018-2019 program by nearly three months, causing significant uncertainty among providers about the future of the program and the ability to serve their patients. The funding announcement that was ultimately released in February 2018 threatened to limit access to the comprehensive, evidence-based family planning services that had been central to the Title X program.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol
    7714 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 42 / Monday, March 4, 2019 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND (8), 59.13, 59.14, 59.17, and 59.18 is 3. Removal of the Requirement for HUMAN SERVICES required by July 2, 2019. Consultation (42 CFR 59.5(a)(10)) Compliance for all other requirements 4. Promotion of Access to Comprehensive 42 CFR Part 59 of this final rule is required by the Primary Health Services (42 CFR effective date, that is, by May 3, 2019. 59.5(a)(12)) [HHS–OS–2018–0008] 5. Title X Transparency (42 CFR 59.5(a)(13) FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RIN 0937–ZA00 6. Encouragement of Family Participation Office of the Assistant Secretary for (42 CFR 59.5(a)(14)) Health (OASH) at (202) 690–7694, Compliance With Statutory Program 7. Provide for Medically Necessary [email protected], or by mail at 200 Integrity Requirements Services (42 CFR 59.5(b)(1)) Independence Avenue SW, Washington, 8. Provide for Coordination and Referral, AGENCY: Office of the Assistant DC 20201 Consistent With Prohibition on Referral Secretary for Health, Office of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: for Abortion (42 CFR 59.5(b)(1)) Secretary, HHS. Department of Health F. Criteria for Selection of Grantees (42 Table of Contents CFR 59.7) and Human Services. G. Confidentiality (42 CFR 59.11) ACTION: Final rule. I. Executive Summary and Background H. Standards of Compliance With A. Executive Summary Prohibition on Abortion (42 CFR 59.13) SUMMARY: The Office of Population 1. Purpose I. Requirements and Limitations With Affairs (OPA), in the Office of the 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Title X: Three Decades of Accomplishment
    Special Analysis sensus that improved access to contraception would further two important social goals—alleviating poverty Title X: Three Decades of and improving the health of women and children. Accomplishment The federal government made its first grants to support the provision of family planning services in 1965 as part Thirty years ago—with data showing that of the Johnson administration’s War on Poverty, a move that led to a patchwork of widely varying publicly subsi- many American women, and especially dized family planning programs across the country over low-income women, were having more chil- the next several years. Since states largely controlled dren than they wanted—Congress created the little funding available under these disparate pro- Title X, the nation’s first federal program grams, service availability, eligibility criteria and benefit levels varied widely. That uneven landscape changed dedicated to the provision of family plan- dramatically in 1970, when Congress enacted Title X of ning services. In the intervening three the Public Health Service Act, the only federal pro- decades, the Title X program has helped gram—then and now—devoted solely to the provision of build a national network of family planning family planning services nationwide. With strong bipar- tisan support, Title X sought to fulfill President Richard clinics, has established the standards used M. Nixon’s historical 1969 promise that “no American for the delivery of high-quality but low-cost woman should be denied access to family planning family planning services nationwide and assistance because of her economic condition.” has enabled millions of women to plan their In the years after its inception, Title X was the major pregnancies and prevent unintended births.
    [Show full text]
  • Title X (Public Health Service Act) Family Planning Program
    Title X (Public Health Service Act) Family Planning Program Angela Napili Information Research Specialist May 6, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33644 Title X (Public Health Service Act) Family Planning Program Summary The federal government provides grants for voluntary family planning services through the Family Planning Program, Title X of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. §§300 to 300a-6). Enacted in 1970, it is the only domestic federal program devoted solely to family planning and related preventive health services. In 2013, Title X-funded clinics served 4.6 million clients. Title X is administered through the Office of Population Affairs (OPA) in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Although the authorization of appropriations for Title X ended with FY1985, funding for the program has continued through appropriations bills for the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies (Labor- HHS-Education). The FY2015 Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act (P.L. 113-235) provides $286 million for Title X, the same as the FY2014 level. The FY2015 act continues previous years’ requirements that Title X funds not be spent on abortions, that all pregnancy counseling be nondirective, and that funds not be spent on promoting or opposing any legislative proposal or candidate for public office. Grantees continue to be required to certify that they encourage “family participation” when minors seek family planning services and to certify that they counsel minors on how to resist attempted coercion into sexual activity. The appropriations law also clarifies that family planning providers are not exempt from state notification and reporting laws on child abuse, child molestation, sexual abuse, rape, or incest.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 Years of Title X: a Timeline of Key Events
    50 Years of Title X: A Timeline of Key Events CELEBRATING TITLE X 1970–2020 1970 Congress creates and authorizes Title X with $6 million in funding. In 1970, Title X of the Public Health Service Act establishes the National Family Planning Program within the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS). The Title X program is the only federal program dedicated solely to providing family planning- related preventive healthcare. Congress makes clear that the primary goal of the Title X program is to decrease the adverse health and financial effects of inadequately spaced childbearing on children, women, and their families. 1972 1975 u In Eisenstadt v. Baird, the Supreme Court u Congress increases reporting requirements, broadens the extends the right to use birth control to definition of low-income, and requires providers to offer a unmarried individuals. broad range of family planning methods. u Congress mandates that Medicaid u Title X funds five family planning nurse practitioner cover the costs of family planning services programs to prepare nurse practitioners to serve patients ($62 million in funding). in Title X sites. 1973 1978 HHS develops Family Planning Regional Training Centers Amendment clarifies that Title X providers in each of the 10 HHS Regions. must address infertility and provide services to adolescents. 1980 1980 $ $ $ $ 1988 Title X service providers implement a The Reagan administration proposes new sliding fee scale. regulation mandating provision of prenatal care and social services to pregnant women and prohibiting Title X-funded providers from: 1981 u Counseling patients on pregnancy options that include abortion or referring patients to Congress legislates that Title X providers abortion providers encourage adolescents to talk with their u parents about family planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Changes to Title X: Implications for Women and Family Planning Providers
    November 2018 | Issue Brief Proposed Changes to Title X: Implications for Women and Family Planning Providers Laurie Sobel, Caroline Rosenzweig, and Alina Salganicoff Key Takeaways The Trump administration has issued new proposed regulations for the federal Title X family planning program that would make significant changes to the program and to the types of providers that qualify for funding. These proposed regulations would: o Block the availability of federal funds to family planning providers like Planned Parenthood that also offer abortion services; o Curtail counseling and referrals to abortion services by Title X funded providers; o Eliminate current requirements that Title X sites offer a broad range of medically approved family planning methods and non-directive pregnancy options counseling that includes information about prenatal care/delivery, adoption, and abortion; and o Direct new funds to faith-based and other organizations that promote fertility awareness and abstinence as methods of family planning. Sites that do not offer abortion services may still qualify for Title X funds, but may decide not to participate because of concerns about clinical standards of care, medical liability, and burdensome administrative requirements. If fully implemented, the proposed changes to Title X would shrink the network of participating providers and have major repercussions for low-income women across the country that rely on them for their family planning care. Introduction The Trump administration has taken numerous steps to alter significantly the Title X program, the federal grant program that supports family planning services to low-income women. These actions would block the availability of federal funds to family planning providers that also offer abortion services like Planned Parenthood, curtail counseling and referrals to abortion services by Title X funded providers, and direct new funds to faith-based and other organizations that promote fertility awareness and abstinence as methods of family planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Title X of the Public Health Service Act
    Family Planning Program Under Title X of the Public Health Service Act Angela Napili Senior Research Librarian Updated October 15, 2018 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R45181 SUMMARY R45181 Family Planning Program Under Title X of the October 15, 2018 Public Health Service Act Angela Napili The federal government provides grants for family planning services through the Family Senior Research Librarian Planning Program, Title X of the Public Health Service Act (PHSA; 42 U.S.C. §§300 to [email protected] 300a-6). Title X, enacted in 1970, is the only domestic federal program devoted solely to family planning and related preventive health services. In 2017, Title X-funded clinics For a copy of the full report, please call 7-5700 or visit served 4 million clients. www.crs.gov. Title X is administered through the Office of Population Affairs (OPA) in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Although the authorization of appropriations for Title X ended in FY1985, funding for the program has continued through appropriations bills for the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies (Labor-HHS-Education). Title X grantees can provide family planning services directly or subaward Title X monies to other public or nonprofit entities to provide services. In December 2016, OPA released a final rule to limit the criteria Title X grantees could use to restrict subawards by stating that “[n]o recipient making subawards for the provision of services as part of its Title X project may prohibit an entity from participating for reasons other than its ability to provide Title X services.” On April 13, 2017, the President signed P.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Title X Family-Planning Services: Fast Facts
    Title X Family-Planning Services: Fast Facts Title X of the Public Health Service Act is the cornerstone of the federal domestic family- planning program: it is the only federal program exclusively dedicated to family planning and reproductive-health services. It was enacted with broad bipartisan support in 1970: one of the chief co-sponsors of the bill was then-Rep. (subsequently President) George H.W. Bush,1 and it was signed into law by then-President Richard Nixon. What services does the Title X family-planning program provide? . Title X provides voluntary, confidential reproductive-health services, including educational services and nondirective counseling on abstinence and contraceptive methods.2 . Federal law prohibits any Title X money from being used for abortion care.3 . The Title X program requires clinics to provide services related to family planning and contraception, including physician exams, prescriptions, laboratory exams, and contraceptive supplies, as well as referrals to other facilities when medically needed.4 Title X services also include related preventive-health services, such as breast and cervical cancer screenings, and education, testing, and referral for treatment for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and HIV. The Title X program also sponsors continuing-education programs for family-planning clinicians each year. In addition, the program maintains a clearinghouse for information and educational materials on family planning and reproductive health, and supports a research program which focuses on family-planning service delivery improvements.5 Who receives care at Title X clinics? . Each year, approximately 4 million young and low-income women and men receive basic health care through the nearly 4,100 clinics nationwide receiving Title X funds.6 Grants are administrated through state health departments or regional umbrella agencies which subcontract to local agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Final Title X Regulation Disregards Expert Opinion and Evidence-Based Practices
    The Final Title X Regulation Disregards Expert Opinion and Evidence-Based Practices February 26, 2019 Washington, D.C. – The Department of Health and Human Services has released a final regulation that will significantly limit the health care available to patients under Title X of the Public Health Service Act (Title X). Leading women’s health care provider groups, medical organizations, and physician leaders representing more than 4.3 million health care providers are alarmed by the new regulation which disregards the expertise of the medical and scientific community and evidence-based standards. “As the only federal program exclusively dedicated to providing low-income patients, including adolescents, with access to family planning and preventive health services and information, Title X plays a vital role in the fabric of America’s family planning safety net. The final regulation is the latest of numerous recent decisions—from rolling back insurance coverage for contraceptives to attempting to eliminate funding for evidence-based teen pregnancy prevention programs—that unravel the threads of this safety net. Together, these decisions compound, leaving women and families with increasingly fewer options for obtaining medically accurate, affordable, and timely access to contraception and preventive care. “The new regulation weakens existing standards requiring that family planning programs funded through Title X offer a range of evidence-based contraception options. It also conditions federal funding for family planning services on a requirement that providers omit certain information in counseling patients and seeks to exclude qualified providers from Title X. “This regulation will do indelible harm to the health of Americans and to the relationship between patients and their providers.
    [Show full text]
  • SAMPLE Title X Grantee Compliance Plan for 2019 Title X Regulations
    MARYLAND LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT – BILLING MANUAL 2020 SAMPLE Title X Grantee Compliance Plan for 2019 Title X Regulations Assurance and Action Plan Documenting Steps to Come Into Compliance – due August 19, 2019 To demonstrate good-faith efforts to comply with the Final Rule, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Population Affairs (OPA) expects all Title X grantees to complete the following: • Assurance and Action Plan Documenting Steps to Come Into Compliance – Due by August 19, 2019 To support grantees in fulfilling this request, this document provides sample language for the assurance, action plan, statement, and supporting evidence. The written statements, planned action steps, completed action steps, and supporting evidence/documentation listed in this document are merely examples. They do not reflect an exhaustive list of statements, actions, and documentation that grantees may provide to demonstrate good-faith efforts to comply with the Final Rule. OPA does not plan to not use any rigid formula to assess compliance with the Final Rule and recognizes that compliance by each grantee warrants particularized evaluation. Accordingly, OPA plans to make an individualized determination in each case. While the statements, actions, and documentation set out in this document are examples of good-faith efforts that may be relevant in evaluating compliance with the Final Rule, they are not meant to be either a checklist or a formula for compliance. And, in any particular case, the examples may not all be relevant, and others may be more salient given the particular facts at issue. A grantee can use an alternative approach to demonstrating compliance if it satisfies the requirements of the Title X statutes and the Final Rule; if you want to discuss an alternative approach, please contact your HHS Project Officer.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSUE BRIEF Title X, the Domestic Gag Rule, and the HIV Response
    February 2019 The Foundation for AIDS Research ISSUE BRIEF Title X, the Domestic Gag Rule, and the HIV Response Title X: The National Family Planning Program Since unintended pregnancies are associated with greater health risks for the mother and child,6 reducing unintended pregnancies 7 The Title X National Family Planning Program is the only is a national priority. federal grant program dedicated to providing individuals with comprehensive family planning and related health services. Policies that restrict or enable the provision of information about Created in 1970, Title X offers care to low-income or uninsured contraceptives, or impede access to them, can impact pregnancy individuals through the provision of grants to public health rates. In one case, Delaware piloted a two-year program that departments, community health organizations, and other nonprofit provided quality improvement and technical assistance to Title agencies. By providing women, their partners, and their families X programs in order to ensure access to reliable contraceptive with a range of birth control methods, cancer screening, and other methods for all women. An evaluation of the program found that 8 reproductive health services, Title X funding reduces unintended unplanned pregnancies among Title X clients fell by 15%. In pregnancies, allows the early diagnosis of potentially deadly another case, when Texas excluded Planned Parenthood from its cancers including breast and cervical cancers, and promotes Medicaid program in 2013, the number of insurance claims for healthy child development. women receiving long-acting, reversible contraceptives declined by 35.5% and the proportion of childbirths reimbursed by Medicaid 9 On June 1, 2018, the Trump Administration proposed a rule change increased by 27.1%.
    [Show full text]