DOCSLIB.ORG

Eastern Suburbs Banksia Scrub Endangered Ecological Community Recovery Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eastern Suburbs Banksia Scrub Endangered Ecological Community Recovery Plan Approved Recovery Plan Eastern Suburbs Banksia Scrub Endangered Ecological Community Recovery Plan February 2004 Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) © Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW), 2004. This work is copyright, however material presented in this plan may be copied for personal use or published for educational purposes, providing that any extracts are fully acknowledged. Apart from this and any other use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced without prior written permission from the DEC. The NPWS is part of the Department of Environment and Conservation Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) 43 Bridge Street (PO Box 1967) Hurstville NSW 2220 Ph: (02) 9585 6444 www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au Requests for information or comments regarding this recovery plan should be directed to:- The Director-General, Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) c/- Eastern Suburbs Banksia Scrub Recovery Program Coordinator Conservation Programs and Planning, Metropolitan Region Environment Protection and Regulation Division Department of Environment and Conservation PO Box 1967 HURSTVILLE NSW 2220 Ph: (02) 9585 6678 Cover photo: P.H. Glass, Jennifer St. La Perouse This plan should be cited as the following NSW Department of Environment and Conservation (2004) Eastern Suburbs Banksia Scrub Endangered Ecological Community Recovery Plan. NSW Department of Environment and Conservation, Hurstville. ISBN 0 7313 6763 4 Recovery Plan for the Eastern Suburbs Banksia Scrub endangered ecological community Eastern Suburbs Banksia Scrub Recovery Plan Executive Summary This document constitutes the formal Commonwealth and New South Wales Recovery Plan for the Eastern Suburbs Banksia Scrub endangered ecological community. It identifies the actions to be taken to ensure the long-term viability of Eastern Suburbs Banksia Scrub in nature and the parties who will carry these out. Eastern Suburbs Banksia Scrub (ESBS) is listed as endangered on Schedule 1 Part 3 of the NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 and as endangered under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. It is a sclerophyllous heath/scrub community that once occupied approximately 5,300 hectares between North Head and Botany Bay in the Sydney Basin Bioregion. Today, only 146 hectares of ESBS remains in small, isolated remnants on a range of tenures including private, Local, State and Commonwealth Government land. ESBS occurs on disjunct patches of nutrient poor, aeolian dune sand and may contain small patches of woodland, low forest or limited wetter areas, depending on site topography and hydrology. Commonly recorded species of the community include Banksia aemula, Banksia ericifolia, Banksia serrata, Eriostemon australasius, Lepidosperma laterale, Leptospermum laevigatum, Monotoca elliptica, Pteridium esculentum, Ricinocarpos pinifolius and Xanthorrhoea resinifera. A major threat to ESBS is the further loss and fragmentation of habitat as a consequence of clearing and development. Other known threats include: altered nutrient flows and hydrological regimes; weed invasion; inappropriate fire regimes; mowing, slashing and the inappropriate use of herbicides; grazing by horses and rabbits; over shading; infection by Phytophthora cinnamomi; erosion and physical damage from surface water run-off, bicycles, motor vehicles, horses, rabbits and excessive pedestrian use; inappropriate plantings; factors affecting pollination and seed dispersal processes; seed and wildflower collection; and the dumping of rubbish (including construction materials and green waste). This recovery plan describes our current understanding of ESBS, documents the management actions undertaken to date, and outlines a recovery program over the next five years. To provide for the future recovery of ESBS, this plan advocates a recovery program that: • maps, assesses and monitors the condition of all ESBS remnants; • ensures that ESBS remnants are not destroyed and that an increased level of legislative protection is provided over land that provides habitat for ESBS; • favours in-situ protection and the management of threats at ESBS sites; • raises public awareness of ESBS and encourages active community participation in its conservation; and • examines the ecological aspects of ESBS which will inform management decisions regarding the long- term conservation of the community. It is intended that this recovery plan will be implemented over a five-year period. Recovery actions will largely be implemented using existing resources of various NSW government agencies and community groups. The total cost to implement the plan is $98,000 over five years, however this does not include the cost of preparing and implementing plans of management. Tony Fleming Bob Debus MP A/Director-General Minister for the Environment Recovery Plan for the Eastern Suburbs Banksia Scrub endangered ecological community Acknowledgments This recovery plan was prepared through joint funding from the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (which is now part of the NSW Department of Environment and Conservation) and Environment Australia (Commonwealth Endangered Species Project No. 20761). The NSW Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) would like to thank the following people and organisations for their assistance during the preparation of the plan: Paul Ibbetson, Bronwyn Conyers and Dionne Coburn (DEC); Daniel Hirschfeld, Tina Digby and Tony Watson (Randwick Council); Michael Buckley (Waverley Council); Dannielle Kirton (Botany Council); Woollahra Council and Manly Council; Michael Mathias, Sonya Dare, Anthony Fitzsimmons and Andrew Freeman (Department of Defence); Robyn Sim and Nick Stroinovsky (Sydney Water Corporation); Nicole Wilmot (Eastern Beaches/Botany Bay CMC); Associate Professor Paul Adam (University of NSW); Judith Peters and Nicola Bryden (Centennial Park and Moore Park Trust); Ken Turner (previously Department of Land and Water Conservation); Energy Australia, Enerserve and Telstra; and the Commonwealth Department of Finance and Administration. Suzanne O’Neil and Martin Bremner (DEC) are acknowledged for editing the draft and final versions of the plan respectively. The DEC would also like to acknowledge the members of the local Randwick community who have been, and continue to be, actively involved in the conservation of ESBS. Recovery Plan for the Eastern Suburbs Banksia Scrub endangered ecological community Table of Contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Legislative Context.......................................................................................................................................... 1 2.1 LEGAL STATUS ......................................................................................................................................... 1 2.2 RECOVERY PLAN PREPARATION................................................................................................................ 1 2.3 RECOVERY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ......................................................................................................... 1 2.4 CRITICAL HABITAT .................................................................................................................................. 2 2.5 KEY THREATENING PROCESSES................................................................................................................ 2 2.6 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................... 3 3 Conservation Status......................................................................................................................................... 3 4 Distribution and habitat................................................................................................................................... 3 4.1 HISTORICAL DISTRIBUTION....................................................................................................................... 3 4.2 CURRENT DISTRIBUTION........................................................................................................................... 4 4.3 HABITAT .................................................................................................................................................. 4 4.3.1 Landform and geology ........................................................................................................................... 4 4.3.2 Climate ................................................................................................................................................... 4 4.4 TENURE AND ZONING ............................................................................................................................... 4 5 Description ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 5.1 SCIENTIFIC DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................................... 4 5.2 DISTINGUISHING THE ESBS COMMUNITY................................................................................................. 7 6 Ecological Processes ......................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Native Orchid Society South Australia
    Journal of the Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc PRINT POST APPROVED VOLUME 25 NO. 11 PP 54366200018 DECEMBER 2001 NATIVE ORCHID SOCIETY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA POST OFFICE BOX 565 UNLEY SOUTH AUSTRALIA 5061 The Native Orchid Society of South Australia promotes the conservation of orchids through the preservation of natural habitat and through cultivation. Except with the documented official representation from the Management Committee no person is authorised to represent the society on any matter. All native orchids are protected plants in the wild. Their collection without written Government permit is illegal. PRESIDENT: SECRETARY: Bill Dear Cathy Houston Telephone: 82962111 Telephone: 8356 7356 VICE-PRESIDENT David Pettifor Tel. 014095457 COMMITTEE David Hirst Thelma Bridle Bob Bates Malcolm Guy EDITOR: TREASURER Gerry Carne Iris Freeman 118 Hewitt Avenue Toorak Gardens SA 5061 Telephone/Fax 8332 7730 E-mail [email protected] LIFE MEMBERS Mr R. Hargreaves Mr G. Carne Mr L. Nesbitt Mr R. Bates Mr R. Robjohns Mr R Shooter Mr D. Wells Registrar of Judges: Reg Shooter Trading Table: Judy Penney Field Trips & Conservation: Thelma Bridle Tel. 83844174 Tuber Bank Coordinator: Malcolm Guy Tel. 82767350 New Members Coordinator David Pettifor Tel. 0416 095 095 PATRON: Mr T.R.N. Lothian The Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc. while taking all due care, take no responsibility for the loss, destruction or damage to any plants whether at shows, meetings or exhibits. Views or opinions expressed by authors of articles within this Journal do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the Management. We condones the reprint of any articles if acknowledgement is given.
    [Show full text]
  • Conospermum Hookeri Hookeri (Tasmanian Smokebush)
    Listing Statement for Conospermum hookeri (tasmanian smokebush) Conospermum hookeri tasmanian smokebush FAMILY: Proteaceae T A S M A N I A N T H R E A T E N E D S P E C I E S L I S T I N G S T A T E M E N T GROUP: Dicotyledon Photos: Naomi Lawrence Scientific name: Conospermum hookeri (Meisn.) E.M.Benn., Fl. Australia 16: 485 (1995) (Meisn.) Common name: tasmanian smokebush Name history: previously known in Tasmania as Conospermum taxifolium. Group: vascular plant, dicotyledon, family Proteaceae Status: Threatened Species Protection Act 1995: vulnerable Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999: Vulnerable Distribution: Biogeographic origin: endemic to Tasmania Tasmanian NRM regions: North, South Tasmanian IBRA Bioregions (V6): South East, Northern Midlands, Ben Lomond, Flinders Figure 1. Distribution of Conospermum hookeri Plate 1. Conospermum hookeri in flower. showing IBRA (V6) bioregions 1 Threatened Species Section – Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Listing Statement for Conospermum hookeri (tasmanian smokebush) Conospermum hookeri may be limited by low seed SUMMARY: Conospermum hookeri (tasmanian production rates. Other species of Conospermum smokebush) is a small shrub in the Proteaceae are known to have low reproductive outputs. family. It is endemic to Tasmania, occurring Approximately 50% of flowers of Conospermum along the East Coast from Bruny Island to species form fruit though only a small Cape Barren Island in 10 locations, two proportion of these produce viable seed presumed locally extinct and another of (Morrison et al. 1994). uncertain status. The number of subpopulations is estimated to be 40, with five Conospermum hookeri makes a highly significant presumed locally extinct or of uncertain status.
    [Show full text]
  • Variation of Physical Seed Dormancy and Its Ecological Role in Fire-Prone Ecosystems
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection 1954-2016 University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2016 Variation of physical seed dormancy and its ecological role in fire-prone ecosystems Ganesha Sanjeewani Liyanage Borala Liyanage University of Wollongong Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses University of Wollongong Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorise you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this work may be reproduced by any process, nor may any other exclusive right be exercised, without the permission of the author. Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the University of Wollongong. Recommended Citation Borala Liyanage, Ganesha Sanjeewani Liyanage, Variation of physical seed dormancy and its ecological role in fire-prone ecosystems, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, School of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Floral Presentation and Bee-Pollination in Two Sprengelia Species (Ericaceae)
    Comparative floral presentation and bee-pollination in two Sprengelia species (Ericaceae) Karen A. Johnson* and Peter B. McQuillan School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 78, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia. *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Pollination by sonication is unusual in the Styphelioideae, family Ericaceae. Sprengelia incarnata and Sprengelia propinqua have floral characteristics that suggested they might be adapted to buzz pollination.Both species have florally similar nectarless flowers except that the stamens ofSprengelia propinqua spread widely after the flower opens, while those of Sprengelia incarnata cohere in the centre of the flower. To test whether sonication occurs, we observed bee behaviour at the flowers of both plant species, documented potential pollinators, and examined their floral and pollen attributes. We found that Sprengelia incarnata had smaller and drier pollen than Sprengelia propinqua. We found that Sprengelia incarnata was sonicated by native bees in the families Apidae (Exoneura), Halictidae (Lasioglossum) and Colletidae (Leioproctus, Euryglossa). Sprengelia propinqua was also visited by bees from the Apidae (Exoneura) and Halictidae (Lasioglossum), but pollen was collected by scraping. The introduced Apis mellifera (Apidae) foraged at Sprengelia propinqua but ignored Sprengelia incarnata. The two Sprengelia species shared some genera of potential pollinators, but appeared to have diverged enough in their floral and pollen characters to elicit different behaviours from the native and introduced bees. Cunninghamia (2011) 12 (1): 45–51 Introduction species, some Leucopogon species, Richea milliganii (Hook.f.) F.Muell., and Sprengelia incarnata Sm. (Houston The interactions between plants and pollinators are thought & Ladd, 2002; Ladd, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • March Meeting and Excursion What’S Inside: Page for Our First Excursion This Year We Will Meet at 9.30Am
    WALLUM AND COASTAL HEATHLAND STUDY GROUP NEWSLETTER No 46 February 2020 ISSN 1038-7889 Leader: Barbara Henderson 36 Railway Terrace MOORE QLD 4306 Ph: 07 5424 7073 Mob: 0438 989 108 Editor: Allan Carr PO Box 541 BRIBIE ISLAND QLD 4507 Ph: 07 3408 7234 Mob: 0424 322 242 [email protected] All photos by Allan Carr unless otherwise indicated March Meeting and Excursion What’s inside: page For our first excursion this year we will meet at 9.30am Sunday, 15 March at Mill Park in Beerwah (UBD SC Map Barbara’s Ramble 2 106:C19). Then we will walk at Beerwah Scientific Area No 1, Feature Plant 3 Mawson Road (UBD SC Map 116:N5). For your Diary 3 The Department of Environment and Science oversees a large Bonni’s Wallum Garden plantation area between Caboolture and Caloundra, and to the west. Due to the foresight of some far-sighted foresters back in at Nerang 4 the 1930s and 1940s, sections of native forest were set aside as More on Bonni’s Garden 5 the pine forests were established. After the Forestry Act of 1959 Vale Betty Sykes 5 was passed, there was provision for such sections to become Quote 6 "Scientific Areas", to be used for scientific purposes, other than Wallum Hotspot 6 pine plantations. Reminders 6 Being the first such area officially declared in Queensland after 1959, the Beerwah section was therefore named "Beerwah State Forest Scientific Area No. 1". Since then it has been gazetted as a National Park. It is divided into blocks of varying size, which are burnt at different intervals and times according to season and weather.
    [Show full text]
  • Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids
    Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids by Karen A. Johnson BSc (Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania February 2012 ii Declaration of originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. Karen A. Johnson Statement of authority of access This thesis may be made available for copying. Copying of any part of this thesis is prohibited for two years from the date this statement was signed; after that time limited copying is permitted in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Karen A. Johnson iii iv Abstract Relationships between plants and their pollinators are thought to have played a major role in the morphological diversification of angiosperms. The epacrids (subfamily Styphelioideae) comprise more than 550 species of woody plants ranging from small prostrate shrubs to temperate rainforest emergents. Their range extends from SE Asia through Oceania to Tierra del Fuego with their highest diversity in Australia. The overall aim of the thesis is to determine the relationships between epacrid floral features and potential pollinators, and assess the evolutionary status of any pollination syndromes. The main hypotheses were that flower characteristics relate to pollinators in predictable ways; and that there is convergent evolution in the development of pollination syndromes.
    [Show full text]
  • Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar Site: Ecological Character Description in Good Faith, Exercising All Due Care and Attention
    Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar site Ecological character description Disclaimer The Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW (DECCW) has compiled the Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar site: Ecological character description in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. DECCW does not accept responsibility for any inaccurate or incomplete information supplied by third parties. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. Readers should seek appropriate advice about the suitability of the information to their needs. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or of the Minister for Environment Protection, Heritage and the Arts. Acknowledgements Phil Straw, Australasian Wader Studies Group; Bob Creese, Bruce Pease, Trudy Walford and Rob Williams, Department of Primary Industries (NSW); Simon Annabel and Rob Lea, NSW Maritime; Geoff Doret, Ian Drinnan and Brendan Graham, Sutherland Shire Council; John Dahlenburg, Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority. Symbols for conceptual diagrams are courtesy of the Integration and Application Network (ian.umces.edu/symbols), University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science. This publication has been prepared with funding provided by the Australian Government to the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority through the Coastal Catchments Initiative Program. © State of NSW, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW, and Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority DECCW and SMCMA are pleased to allow the reproduction of material from this publication on the condition that the source, publisher and authorship are appropriately acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytophthora Resistance and Susceptibility Stock List
    Currently known status of the following plants to Phytophthora species - pathogenic water moulds from the Agricultural Pathology & Kingdom Protista. Biological Farming Service C ompiled by Dr Mary Cole, Agpath P/L. Agricultural Consultants since 1980 S=susceptible; MS=moderately susceptible; T= tolerant; MT=moderately tolerant; ?=no information available. Phytophthora status Life Form Botanical Name Family Common Name Susceptible (S) Tolerant (T) Unknown (UnK) Shrub Acacia brownii Mimosaceae Heath Wattle MS Tree Acacia dealbata Mimosaceae Silver Wattle T Shrub Acacia genistifolia Mimosaceae Spreading Wattle MS Tree Acacia implexa Mimosaceae Lightwood MT Tree Acacia leprosa Mimosaceae Cinnamon Wattle ? Tree Acacia mearnsii Mimosaceae Black Wattle MS Tree Acacia melanoxylon Mimosaceae Blackwood MT Tree Acacia mucronata Mimosaceae Narrow Leaf Wattle S Tree Acacia myrtifolia Mimosaceae Myrtle Wattle S Shrub Acacia myrtifolia Mimosaceae Myrtle Wattle S Tree Acacia obliquinervia Mimosaceae Mountain Hickory Wattle ? Shrub Acacia oxycedrus Mimosaceae Spike Wattle S Shrub Acacia paradoxa Mimosaceae Hedge Wattle MT Tree Acacia pycnantha Mimosaceae Golden Wattle S Shrub Acacia sophorae Mimosaceae Coast Wattle S Shrub Acacia stricta Mimosaceae Hop Wattle ? Shrubs Acacia suaveolens Mimosaceae Sweet Wattle S Tree Acacia ulicifolia Mimosaceae Juniper Wattle S Shrub Acacia verniciflua Mimosaceae Varnish wattle S Shrub Acacia verticillata Mimosaceae Prickly Moses ? Groundcover Acaena novae-zelandiae Rosaceae Bidgee-Widgee T Tree Allocasuarina littoralis Casuarinaceae Black Sheoke S Tree Allocasuarina paludosa Casuarinaceae Swamp Sheoke S Tree Allocasuarina verticillata Casuarinaceae Drooping Sheoak S Sedge Amperea xipchoclada Euphorbaceae Broom Spurge S Grass Amphibromus neesii Poaceae Swamp Wallaby Grass ? Shrub Aotus ericoides Papillionaceae Common Aotus S Groundcover Apium prostratum Apiaceae Sea Celery MS Herb Arthropodium milleflorum Asparagaceae Pale Vanilla Lily S? Herb Arthropodium strictum Asparagaceae Chocolate Lily S? Shrub Atriplex paludosa ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of Moreton Island
    Flora of Moreton Island Mangroves & Mangroves Saltmarsh Foredunes Seepage Areas Headland communities & Melaleuca swamp assoc. communities Sedgelands heath Wet & closed Dry heath scrubs woodlands Grassy and Open forests woodlands shrubby sites Disturbed Growth form Dicotyledons . Aizoaceae C Carpobrotus glaucescens pigface herb C Sesuvium portulacastrum sea purslane herb C Tetragonia tetragonioides New Zealand spinach herb Amaranthaceae C Achyranthes aspera chaff-flower herb * Alternanthera pungens khaki weed, bindi herb * Amaranthus viridis green amaranth herb Anacardiaceae * Schinus terebinthifolius broad-leaved pepper low tree Apiaceae C Apium prostratum var. sea celery herb prostratum C Centella asiatica pennywort herb 1 Flora of Moreton Island Mangroves & Mangroves Saltmarsh Foredunes Seepage Areas Headland communities & Melaleuca swamp assoc. communities Sedgelands heath Wet & closed Dry heath scrubs woodlands Grassy and Open forests woodlands shrubby sites Disturbed Growth form C Hydrocotyle acutiloba pennywort herb * Hydrocotyle bonariensis pennywort herb C Platysace ericoides heath platysace herb C Xanthosia pilosa woolly xanthosia herb Apocynaceae * Catharanthus roseus pink periwinkle shrub * Nerium oleander oleander tall shrub C Parsonsia straminea monkey rope climber Araliaceae C Astrotricha glabra low shrub C Astrotricha longifolia star hair bush low shrub * Schefflera actinophylla umbrella tree low tree Asclepiadaceae * Asclepias curassavica red head cotton bush low shrub C Cynanchum carnosum
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Or Threatened Vascular Plant Species of Wollemi National Park, Central Eastern New South Wales
    Rare or threatened vascular plant species of Wollemi National Park, central eastern New South Wales. Stephen A.J. Bell Eastcoast Flora Survey PO Box 216 Kotara Fair, NSW 2289, AUSTRALIA Abstract: Wollemi National Park (c. 32o 20’– 33o 30’S, 150o– 151oE), approximately 100 km north-west of Sydney, conserves over 500 000 ha of the Triassic sandstone environments of the Central Coast and Tablelands of New South Wales, and occupies approximately 25% of the Sydney Basin biogeographical region. 94 taxa of conservation signiicance have been recorded and Wollemi is recognised as an important reservoir of rare and uncommon plant taxa, conserving more than 20% of all listed threatened species for the Central Coast, Central Tablelands and Central Western Slopes botanical divisions. For a land area occupying only 0.05% of these divisions, Wollemi is of paramount importance in regional conservation. Surveys within Wollemi National Park over the last decade have recorded several new populations of signiicant vascular plant species, including some sizeable range extensions. This paper summarises the current status of all rare or threatened taxa, describes habitat and associated species for many of these and proposes IUCN (2001) codes for all, as well as suggesting revisions to current conservation risk codes for some species. For Wollemi National Park 37 species are currently listed as Endangered (15 species) or Vulnerable (22 species) under the New South Wales Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995. An additional 50 species are currently listed as nationally rare under the Briggs and Leigh (1996) classiication, or have been suggested as such by various workers. Seven species are awaiting further taxonomic investigation, including Eucalyptus sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Pea Plants Walkabout KWG
    Native Pea Plants Walkabout KWG standard (petal) wing wing (petal) (petal) keel (2 petals) Pea plants and wattles (botanically, members of the Fabaceae family) both possess root nodules containing nitrogen-fixing bacteria and have pods as their fruit. We classify the pea plants as Fabaceae, Subfamily Faboideae, the wattles as Fabaceae, Subfamily Mimosoideae. Many native pea plants grow in Ku-ring-gai Wildflower Garden, most of them with yellow–coloured flowers. Take a walk through the garden and see if you can find them. To help with their identification pictures of these species are shown below and underneath each picture a few key features are noted. Fuller descriptions of these plants can be found on Australian Plants Society – North Shore Group Blandfordia website: https://austplants.com.au/North-Shore/ in “Notes” on the Walks & Talks page. Excellent pictures can be found on the Hornsby Library website: www.hornsby.nsw.gov.au/library under: eLibrary, Learning and Research, Hornsby Herbarium. Detailed botanical descriptions are given on the PlantNET website: http://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/ Dillwynias – all have ‘ear-like’ standards Phyllota phylicoides: standard Pultenaea stipularis: slight dip in Dillwynia floribunda (topmost picture): cathedral-shaped, new growth standard, stem densely covered with flowers dense towards end of branches extends beyond inflorescence, brown stipules Dillwynia retorta: twisted leaves green leaf-like bracteoles Bossiaea heterophylla: large dip in Bossiaea obcordata: large dip in Bossiaea scolopendria:
    [Show full text]