Ready Player Four: Waluigi and the Rainbow Road to the Alt-Right
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Ready Player Four: Waluigi and the Rainbow Road to the Alt-Right Michael Bodkin Panic at the Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Volume 1, Issue 2, July 2019, pp.62-76 (Article). Published by Panic at the Discourse. ISSN 2562-542X(Online) © The Author(s) and Panic at the Discourse, 2019. For additional information, reprints and permission: www.panicdiscourse.com Ready Player Four: Waluigi and the Rainbow Road to the Alt-Right Michael Bodkin Abstract: Nintendo’s mischievous fourth Mario brother, Waluigi, circulates in alternative online communities in a wild exchange of memes. This paper charts an online folkloric reception of Waluigi through an intertwining of controversial cultural politics with the critical theory of Jean Baudrillard and Mikhail Bakhtin. As an empty signifier whose carnivalesque elements imply the inversion of both the Marioverse and non-gaming worlds, Waluigi is situated as an apparatus for the realization of alternative politics. With contributions from the subcultural radar of Angela Nagle, this paper explores the fate of Nintendo’s nefarious avatar as a mascot for alt-light manipulation. Keywords: Waluigi, Nintendo, alt-right, Baudrillard, carnivalesque The internet has gone purple. Nintendo’s Waluigi, the lanky nemesis hailing from the Marioverse, envenoms the internet in the spread of toxic memes, infinitely looping “crotch- chopping” gifs, to eye-rolling and ironically sentimental (WAH)lentine’s Day cards written in Comic Sans font. From advertising Sham-Wahs to sprawling across Wal-Ouija boards, the spike in popularity of Waluigi proves that Nintendo’s fourth amusement plumber has infiltrated mainstream media quite unlike its classic red and green heroes. These hoodwinking memes seem to carry the nefarious tradition of the similar crimped-moustached and crooked-nosed caricature Dick Dastardly, whose quintessential archetype is known to somehow devilishly foil the world of Yogi Bear and his friends. Similarly, Waluigi sneaks up in popular media but to clown around in mainstream etiquette instead, and interrupt neoliberal divinations and capitalist prophecies. To many reddit and Facebook users uniting under the hashtag #justiceforwaluigi, there is an emergent “Wahmunism” that recognizes the induction of Waluigi as a ‘woke’ anti-hero into the memeverse along with other fictional characters such as Shaggy from Scooby-Doo, Thanos from the Avengers, Shrek, and Kramer from Seinfeld. Patrick Marlborough, a journalist who writes for Australian online magazine Junkee, discerns Wahmunism throughout many dark corners of the internet: “His persistent nastiness makes him stand out in the Marioverse. The internet is littered with videos of pop-songs as sung by Waluigi, Waluigi edited into other video games, Waluigi fan-films, even Waluigi hentai… Panic at the Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Volume 1, Issue 2 (2019): 62–76. © Panic at the Discourse Ready Player Four 63 The catchphrase ‘It’s Waluigi time’ is ubiquitous on Tumblr. Waluigi revisionism is very real, but ultimately harmless.”1 At face-value, #justiceforwaluigi, popularized after Waluigi’s exclusion from Nintendo’s Super Smash Bros. Ultimate, appears only to be an innocuous jamboree of memes as a visual—at times, sentimentally poetic— petition for the avatar to be a playable brawler. Scrolling through these memes might come to a crawling stop when a floating head of Waluigi appears superimposed onto a screenshot of Donald Trump during a presidential Figure 1 "Waluigi“We need as to Pepe build the a wah,” Frog," source: source: debate with the caption “We need to build a wah” https://i.imgur.comhttps://i.pinimg.com/ (figure 1). Suddenly, the symbolic function of Waluigi mutates. In another corner of the Internet, Waluigi can be seen shapeshifting into the likeness of an eternally weeping Pepe the Frog, whose popularity stems from Matt Furie’s 2005 comic Boy’s Club (figure 2). As Mike Wendling, author of Alt- Right: From 4chan to the White House observes, Pepe is none other than a “mascot of the alt- right movement” which saw its appropriation into alt- right groups by 2016.2 Could Nintendo’s seemingly harmless avatar be co-opted by neo-Nazism? Exploring the bait-and-switch of “alt-light”3 psychology, which according to Wendling may provide insight to Waluigi’s affiliation with Trump and Pepe, and perhaps alt-right sensibility. According to Wendling, the purpose is to slowly “draw people further towards [the alt-right] side.”4 The self-pitying and misunderstood Mario brother demonstrates a new face of authority in a toxic atmosphere of eccentric right-wing politics, obnoxious memes, and revolutionary platformers that question Marlborough’s claim of “harmless” Waluigi revisionism. The purple haze of Wahmunism as an Figure 2 "Waluigi as Pepe the Frog," source: ideology is an incubator for an alt-light sensibility, and https://i.imgur.com Waluigi stands proudly as its leader. To show how this inauguration unfolds, I situate Waluigi within a short analysis of Jean Baudrillard’s concept of the epidemic of value to demonstrate how Nintendo’s avatar is an exemplar for the modern condition of the effects of valueless simulation. Rendered as an empty signifier, Waluigi becomes the perfect meme on which layers of “memetic folklore”5 command Waluigi’s moral leverage. This discussion will dovetail with a brief look at Mikhail Bahktin’s Panic at the Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Journal 64 M. Bodkin reading of the carnivalesque to provide insight to Waluigi as an inversion of a political left (Mario). I develop these concepts in tandem with Angela Nagle’s examination of alt-right sensibility to situate Waluigi as a potential influencer of alt-light agendas. But before we dive into the theory, this paper turns toward a quick glance of Waluigi’s extraordinary technological heritage. Since his sudden inception in 2000 as a new contender in Mario Tennis, Nintendo has yet to provide any lore of his belonging in the Mario Brothers series alongside the digital heroes of the 80s and 90s. Neither have they provided a strong interpersonal history of the character to legitimize his belonging to the franchise. The idea of Waluigi was simply born out of a technical flaunting that filled the Nintendo 64’s infrequently used fourth controller, allowing the rare occasion of four players to compete in doubles tennis against each other. It would make sense, as Marlborough states, that “Mario had a decent rival in his stocky garlic-guzzling nemesis Wario, but what of his brother (and doubles partner) Luigi? And so [Fumihide Aoki of Camelot Games] created Waluigi.”6 Red with green; yellow with purple. The pairing makes some sense in basic colour theory; yet, as he rightly observes, the archetypal matching between Luigi and his rival is blatantly left unfinished. Quite possibly, the fact that Waluigi was cloned ex nihilo out of technological rather than mythological necessity has provided reason for the gaming community to give Waluigi some character development or “folklore,”7 in Lynne McNeill’s words, onto an otherwise silent and misshapen model. For McNeill, attaching folklore to an instance of internet media is an attempt to linguistically rescue its otherwise fading relevance. But Waluigi’s lack of narrative within the fantasy realm of the Marioverse has indeed led to stranger interpretations that have engendered him with a questionable sense of eeriness. Take for example, Marlborough’s recitation of a profound ontological analysis of Waluigi beginning with a brief etymology of his name: [I]n Japanese [it] is Waruīji: ‘warui’ meaning ‘bad’, ‘Luigi’ meaning, well, ‘Luigi’. But it’s also a pun on the Japanese word Ijiwaru, meaning ill-tempered or cruel. Waluigi is nothing but an alternate of Luigi, who is an alternate of Mario—created to be Wario’s (the perversion of Mario) partner in crime.8 Aside from piggybacking on the vague familial ties to other characters who already have a story established within the Marioverse, Waluigi’s only ties within the rivalling tennis quartet is through harmless cloning, palette swapping, and a quasi-inversion of protagonist semantics and branding.9 This recuperation makes some logical sense in terms of creating rivals out of more than the colour of their suspenders. Waluigi also grotesquely differs in likeness and attitude, which has consequentially given the character a doubly negative quality. Marlborough’s analysis continues, but in this instance to address his curious letter-branding: “His design (his cap bares Panic at the Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Journal Ready Player Four 65 an upside down ‘L’) denotes his role as a signifier created solely to reflect another signifier—a black-mirror, a shadow of a shadow. Waluigi is a triple negative, a man outside himself, a man built to fill a void by functioning as one.”10 Therefore, Waluigi is a distant derivative of the original formula but separated from it by two other layers of archetypal signifiers which can never be known to the other two brothers. While this mirroring analogy seems dark, Marlborough is perhaps using this cultural folklore to suggest that Waluigi is an isolated character and is branded as such by a doubly inverted symbol that is not read in the English alphabet. This means Waluigi is more easily dissociated from the script of the Marioverse. In other words, the avatar represents the appeal of total freedom and can vacillate between gaming and cultural politics more readily than the other brothers. This might explain the explosion of Waluigi-mania on the internet as the avatar is a magnetic tabula rasa for the absorption of a new cultural code—symbolized by none other than the upside-down L. It is not surprising that Marlborough’s echoing of Waluigi’s cultural folklore closely follows Baudrillard’s post-structural warning signs of simulation and simulated value, which is reminiscent of his critique of modernity in The Transparency of Evil: Essays on Extreme Phenomena.