Poweshiek Paradise Lost

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Poweshiek Paradise Lost Opposite page: A Poweshiek Skipperling. July 3, 2006. Puchyan Prairie SNA, Green Lake Co., WI. Left: Butterfly milkweed Asclepias( tuberosa) is one of many beautiful flowers found on Midwestern prairies. July 20, 2008. Stinson Prairie SP, Kossuth Co., IA. Frank Olsen in upland prairie, but that upland prairie is number of sites and number of individuals), typically adjacent to lowland prairie and even the Poweshiek, with its distinctive whirring wetlands. However, Poweshieks also occur in flight, is still my favorite, the memory of lowland prairie that has no upland prairie in 245 individuals (seemingly one or more on the habitat patch. every coneflower) in a single part of this same Many mysteries remain. Is the Michigan prairie still fresh in my mind from June 30, habitat (wetlands) an outlier, or just what’s left 1989. there of a more continuous occupation of wet to dry prairie seen farther west? Poweshieks Mike Reese The quintessential tallgrass prairie skipper, Poweshiek Skipperling inhabits the full range appear disinclined to disperse far, suggesting of prairie vegetation types from lowland that caterpillar rearing areas would not be (wet) to upland (dry). It is often found far away from areas used by adults. So do near wetlands Poweshieks and in rolling successfully topography, “Poweshiek Skipperling has experienced breed in both and is possibly tremendous decline in the last two upland and Poweshiek Paradise Lost more restricted centuries, and this continues up to today.” lowland, as the to moister smattering of egg prairie types at and caterpillar by Ann Swengel the western edge of its range. At the eastern plant observations suggest? Then is the extreme of its range, this skipper is known benefit of “up-low” (my term for the presence from sedgy meadows and fen wetlands in of both upland and lowland grassland of any Michigan. The main adult flight period type in a habitat patch) about varying success On a pleasantly warm and sunny day subspecies) were nectaring on coneflowers is typically in late June to mid-July, with of this breeding in up vs. low among years of with a remarkably light breeze, my husband too. Hundreds of Regal Fritillaries, both winter passed as a partially grown caterpillar. major climatic differences (hot vs. cool and Scott and I walked the slopes of Hole-in-the- males and females, chased about in their Documentations of egg-laying sites and wet vs. dry years)? What are the limiting Mountain Prairie in southwestern Minnesota. characteristic frenzy. Although the date caterpillar foodplants are relatively few: factors on its curious and narrow range? What Of the dozen Ottoe Skippers, one male (July 16, 1990) was very late in the flight of wetland species like spike-rush (Michigan) makes it possible for this species to attain departed its pale purple coneflower to chase Poweshiek Skipperling, over a dozen nectared and sedges (Dakotas), as well as dominant amazing densities, and therefore dramatic a lone female Dakota Skipper straggling at on coneflowers and lobelias and fluttered low prairie grasses: Indian grass in the wild and fluctuations in abundance? There is much yet the end of that species’ flight period. Several through the grasses, flashing black above and big bluestem in the lab (Iowa) and prairie to learn, but will we be able to? dozen Arogos Skippers (the midwestern ‘Iowa’ silver-gray below. Although the easiest of the dropseed and little bluestem (Wisconsin). By Poweshiek Skipperling has experienced mid-summer prairie skippers to find (both in far the highest densities of this species occur tremendous decline in the last two centuries, 16 American Butterflies,Winter 2008 17 and this continues up to today. Of course, the difference in landscape but instead only due vast destruction of tallgrass prairie (99% or to a difference in volume of data — decades more in most states) for agricultural use was and centuries of voluminous observation and catastrophic for prairie skippers. Numerous compilation. Since our European colleagues threats such as plowing, prolonged heavy have embraced their devastating conservation grazing, frequent mowings, quarrying, failures, they have been able to change course suburban sprawl, and so on beset prairie and help their particular butterflies and sites habitat in the unpreserved landscape. But obtain better outcomes. Their relentless in the last half century, thousands of acres candor has also given us the opportunity to of never-tilled prairie with wonderful flora learn from their experiences. supporting large Poweshiek populations In the spirit of this British precedent, I’d have been protected. Many tracts amount to like to examine the numerous factors that help hundreds or even a thousand acres or more, explain what makes Poweshiek populations and are managed for their natural value. Yet tick, although it’s unclear we’ll ever decipher stunning Poweshiek declines have continued it all. But we do know a lot about what on these preserves for many years, or even associates with bigger, stronger populations decades, after the habitat was protected, and and conversely with smaller, more localized, these dramatic declines continue up to the and declining populations. While Poweshiek present. Since extirpation (extinction of a inhabits the full range of prairie vegetation population) is hard to prove, I won’t use that (degraded, semi-degraded, and undegraded term about Poweshiek here; instead I call a types of never-tilled prairie), its abundance is population “subdetectable” when it goes from markedly higher in undegraded vegetation at reliably findable to only erratic hit and miss topographically diverse sites that support both records, if found at all. wet and dry grassland. Both subtle swales and This phenomenon is not new. Several rolling hills accomplish this. Large sites (75 decades ago, Jeremy Thomas reported that or more acres) tend to have higher Poweshiek conservation actions to manage for more densities but this pattern is not as strong. caterpillar foodplant led directly to the The factor affecting Poweshiek extinction of the Large Blue subspecies abundance that humans have the most control endemic to England. This butterfly had over, especially in preserves, is land use an obligatory relationship to a particular (management). After all, we can’t easily ant species that required a relatively change the topography of a site from uniform sparse vegetative structure. When the ant to having “up-low” in a way that benefits disappeared, and it did so even when the Poweshieks. Patch size is likewise hard to vegetation had only subtly altered, so did improve, since prairie plantings in previously the butterfly. Subsequently, Martin Warren’s tilled fields are unlikely to be used much landmark analysis in the early 1990s by Poweshieks. Management to improve documented losses of vulnerable butterfly vegetative quality (i.e., reduce non-native populations just as great on protected as on weeds) has, in my observation, rarely reduced unprotected land in central southern England. these weeds substantially for the long term, Frank Olsen (3) These British results have been dismissed and perversely, they may increase instead. as consequences of the highly altered and Even more rarely have I seen the methods Stinson Prairie still harbors many beautiful wildflowers, but sadly Poweshiek Skipperlings have fragmented “semi-natural” habitats on this used to improve vegetative quality tolerated not been seen here in the recent past. island long and densely populated by people, well by localized butterflies present at the site in contrast to our “natural” prairies not all at the outset. We can’t even predict annual Top: An area of Stinson Prairie filled with leadplants Amorpha( canescens). that many years removed from when they fluctuations in abundance (tell me now what Bottom left: Wild onion (Allium stellatum). existed undespoiled. But in actuality, these the next season’s weather will be like), much Bottom right: Plains tickseed (Coreopsis tinctoria). British outcomes are apparently not due to a less change Poweshiek responses to weather. 18 American Butterflies,Winter 2008 19 Frank Olsen (4) 20 American Butterflies,Winter 2008 21 had not previously been used in the area, is visited were preserves managed with fire on a usually started. While effects of these changes rotation of about 3-6 years. may occur quickly, it could take years, even “Idling” (doing virtually nothing for many decades, for the full impact on butterflies from years) has consistently associated with the these changes in management to become fully highest Poweshiek numbers. Furthermore, apparent, especially if this new management Poweshiek abundance also correlated is applied only to a portion of the habitat positively with increasing years since any patch per year. He also noted, in the context management action of any type. To the of Dakota Skipper, that concentration areas extent an area shows signs of brush or weeds for immature stages need to be protected from increasing, Poweshieks fared better when this fire, and the locations of these concentration is addressed in very localized treatments such areas can vary among years within a site. as mowing, brush-cutting, or spot-herbiciding About a decade later, Tim Orwig and only the problem plants. Rotational mowing Dennis Schlicht wrote that prairie-obligate (leaving the clippings lie) or haying (removing skippers are staggered in the timing of their the clippings) in a single cutting of only part life stages, so that no “safe” time exists when a of the site in a given year, especially in late fire can avoid incinerating immature skippers. summer or early fall, also came out on top for Likewise, any management action (burning, Poweshiek, and was well favored by Dakota mowing, haying, or grazing) can interfere and Arogos Skippers and Regal Fritillary with the availability of resources (possibly as well. Areas hayed annually fared more quite limited in location within a site) required poorly for Poweshiek, and heavy grazing at that time by the skippers, possibly in an was also poor.
Recommended publications
  • Butterflies and Moths of San Bernardino County, California
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • Field Checklist of the Butterflies of Sonora, Mexico
    Field Checklist Field Checklist of of the Butterfl ies of Sonora, Mexico The Butterfl ies of Sonora, Mexico List Compiled by Jim P. Brock Checklists available at Mexico Birding Website March 2009 http://MexicoBirding.com Kurt Radamaker Checklist Locality __________________________________ Observer(s) _______________________________ of the 1 Date __________Time ______ Total Species ____ Butterfl ies of Mexico Weather __________________________________ Remarks __________________________________ This checklist is a direct result of the work of Jim P. Brock's col- lecting and research in Sonora, Mexico since 1984. Locality __________________________________ Observer(s) _______________________________ 2 Date __________Time ______ Total Species ____ Weather __________________________________ Remarks __________________________________ Locality __________________________________ Observer(s) _______________________________ 3 Date __________Time ______ Total Species ____ Weather __________________________________ Remarks __________________________________ Locality __________________________________ Observer(s) _______________________________ 4 Date __________Time ______ Total Species ____ Weather __________________________________ Remarks __________________________________ Locality __________________________________ Observer(s) _______________________________ 5 Date __________Time ______ Total Species ____ Weather __________________________________ Booklet Design by Remarks __________________________________ Kurt and Cindy Radamaker March 2009 1 2
    [Show full text]
  • The Nectar Sources and Flower Preferences of the Poweshiek Skipperling (Oarisma Poweshiek) in Manitoba
    The nectar sources and flower preferences of the Poweshiek Skipperling (Oarisma poweshiek) in Manitoba. Sarah Jericho Semmler Supervisor: Dr. A. R. Westwood A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the Honours Thesis (BIOL 4111/6) Course Department of Biology University of Winnipeg 2010 Abstract The Poweshiek Skipperling, Oarisma poweshiek, is a threatened butterfly found within the 2300 ha Tall Grass Prairie Preserve in southern Manitoba. Land management practices to maintain prairie habitats in a natural state, primarily burning and grazing, have been linked to a reduction in Poweshiek Skipperling habitat. Management activities in prairie habitat can change flowering plant composition, which may reduce the amount or type of nectar sources available for adult butterflies. In this study nectar plant diversity and adult Poweshiek Skipperling flower utilization between two sites with different burn histories was assessed. Preferred nectar flower sources of the Poweshiek Skipperling included Rudbeckia hirta and Solidago ptarmicoides, with skipperlings showing a strong preference for a 2002 burn site versus a 2008 burn site. Flowering plant diversity increased in the 2002 burn over the Poweshiek Skipperling flight period in comparison to the 2008 burn. The 2002 burn had shorter, less dense grass cover as well as a greater number of flowering stems of R. hirta and S. ptarmicoides. The level of competition by arthropods for the nectar or basking area on R. hirta was similar between the 2002 and 2008 burn sites. Flower nectar analysis indicated that sugar concentrations in R. hirta and S. ptarmicoides were relatively low compared to other flowering species during the flight period. The nectar tube length was similar in R.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes from the Poweshiek Skipperling Workshop
    2011 Minutes from the Poweshiek Skipperling Workshop Photo: J. Dupont Winnipeg, Manitoba March 24th and 25th The minutes below represent the collective views captured and opinions of the experts who gathered to discuss the Poweshiek Skipperling. The views expressed in this document don’t represent the views of any one participant. The Workshop was led by the Nature Conservancy of Canada, Manitoba Region, and the minutes were summarized from audio recording and written notes by Jaimée Dupont. We would like to extend huge thank you to all of the individuals and organizations that attended and contributed to the workshop. We would also like to thank our sponsors: Abstract The objectives of this workshop were to bring together the Poweshiek Skipperling experts and those responsible for managing the species’ habitat from across its range, and open the lines of communication between them. Key goals of this workshop included identifying common trends amongst populations, discussing potential causes of these trends, identifying key research gaps and discussing how to fill these gaps. Workshop discussions provided immediate feedback and direction for National Recovery Planning and Implementation efforts that are currently underway in Canada and the USA. Conservation actions that should occur (range-wide and locally) were identified to ensure ongoing persistence of the species. The dramatic and seemingly concurrent declines seen locally were, unfortunately, echoed by participants from across the range (with the exception of Michigan). Workshop participants identified several potential causes of the species’ range- wide decline. Several potential factors that may be operating on a range-wide scale were discussed, and several lines of investigation were identified as critical research needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Lower Rio Grande Valley and Santa Ana National Wildlife
    Final Lower Rio Grande Valley and Santa Ana National Wildlife Refuges Comprehensive Conservation Plan September 1997 (Reprint March 1999) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cover Artwork by Brian Cobble Table of Contents VISION........................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary................................................................................................................... 6 1.0 Introduction and Regional Setting................................................................................. 8 1.1 LRGV Challenges............................................................................................... 8 2.0 Planning Perspectives and Considerations................................................................ 9 2.1 National Wildlife Refuge System ................................................................... 9 2.2 The Service & Ecosystem Management ...................................................... 9 2.3 Refuge Complex and Management Districts........................................... 10 2.4 Laguna Atascosa NWR -- A Partner with LRGV NWR............................ 10 2.5 Planning Perspectives.................................................................................... 10 2.6 The Issues.......................................................................................................... 11 2.7 The Need for Action........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North American Butterfly Association
    NORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLY ASSOCIATION 4 Delaware Road, Morristown, NJ 07960 tel. 973-285-0907 fax 973-285-0936 web: www.naba.org ANNUAL NABA BUTTERFLY COUNT - INSTRUCTIONS (USA) This printed count forms is for field use only. All counts must submit their results using the online data entry system. Please contact the NABA Count Program if you have questions or concerns. Please report your count results directly to NABA Timing/Requirements for United through our online count form at www.butterflycounts.org. Stated Counts The online form allows compilers to enter all data for their Count NABA 4th of July Butterfly Count: A minimum of four counts through the Web and also allows the regional editors adult observers AND 6 party-hours per count are Date of REQUIRED for all counts started after 2008; and, to review and edit the reports efficiently. Most importantly, June or except in extenuating circumstances, ALL counts should Butterfly Count information will be entered and stored in a July expend at least 6 party-hours of effort. database which in the future will allow it to be available Count online to NABA members and the public. If entering your Date other NABA Seasonal Butterfly Count: A minimum of four adult observers AND 6 party-hours per count is data through the online count form presents any difficulty, than June REQUIRED. please contact NABA for assistance. or July COUNT PROGRAM OVERVIEW DATE OF NEXT YEAR'S COUNT In order to encourage increased participation in the Please contact NABA (at address/phone above, or e-mail NABA Butterfly Count Program and to encourage even more to ) with the date of your next year's monitoring possibilities, the NABA Board of Directors [email protected] authorized the introduction of Seasonal Butterfly Counts in count and information on how to contact the compiler.
    [Show full text]
  • Aggregated Occurrence Records of the Federally Endangered Poweshiek Skipperling (Oarisma Poweshiek)
    Biodiversity Data Journal 6: e29081 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.6.e29081 Data Paper Aggregated occurrence records of the federally endangered Poweshiek skipperling (Oarisma poweshiek) Michael W Belitz‡, Lillian K Hendrick‡, Michael J Mon ls§, David L Cuthrell§, Christopher J Marshall|, Akito Y Kawahara¶#, Neil S Cobb , Jennifer M Zaspel¤, Andrew M Horton«¶, Stacey L Huber , Andrew D Warren¶, Grace A Forthaus‡‡, Anna K Mon ls ‡ Central Michigan University and Institute for Great Lakes Research, Mount Pleasant, United States of America § Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Michigan State University Extension, Lansing, United States of America | Oregon State Arthropod Collection, Department of Integrative Biology, Corvallis, United States of America ¶ McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States of America # Merriam-Powell Center for Environmental Research and Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagsta , United States of America ¤ Department of Zoology, Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee, United States of America « Minnesota-Wisconsin Ecological Services Field O ce, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bloomington, United States of America Corresponding author: Anna K Mon ls (mon [email protected]) Academic editor: Martin Wiemers Received: 14 Aug 2018 | Accepted: 07 Sep 2018 | Published: 27 Sep 2018 Citation: Belitz M, Hendrick L, Mon ls M, Cuthrell D, Marshall C, Kawahara A, Cobb N, Zaspel J, Horton A, Huber S, Warren A, Forthaus G, Mon ls A (2018) Aggregated occurrence records of the federally endangered powesheik skipperling (Oarisma powesheik). Biodiversity Data Journal 6: e29081. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.6.e29081 ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E2520F44-993A-4D8B-8E58-28D3D4F9BBD7 Abstract Background Primary biodiversity data records that are open access and available in a standardised format are essential for conservation planning and research on policy-relevant time-scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Illustration Sources
    APPENDIX ONE ILLUSTRATION SOURCES REF. CODE ABR Abrams, L. 1923–1960. Illustrated flora of the Pacific states. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. ADD Addisonia. 1916–1964. New York Botanical Garden, New York. Reprinted with permission from Addisonia, vol. 18, plate 579, Copyright © 1933, The New York Botanical Garden. ANDAnderson, E. and Woodson, R.E. 1935. The species of Tradescantia indigenous to the United States. Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Reprinted with permission of the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University. ANN Hollingworth A. 2005. Original illustrations. Published herein by the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, Fort Worth. Artist: Anne Hollingworth. ANO Anonymous. 1821. Medical botany. E. Cox and Sons, London. ARM Annual Rep. Missouri Bot. Gard. 1889–1912. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis. BA1 Bailey, L.H. 1914–1917. The standard cyclopedia of horticulture. The Macmillan Company, New York. BA2 Bailey, L.H. and Bailey, E.Z. 1976. Hortus third: A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada. Revised and expanded by the staff of the Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. Reprinted with permission from William Crepet and the L.H. Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. BA3 Bailey, L.H. 1900–1902. Cyclopedia of American horticulture. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. BB2 Britton, N.L. and Brown, A. 1913. An illustrated flora of the northern United States, Canada and the British posses- sions. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York. BEA Beal, E.O. and Thieret, J.W. 1986. Aquatic and wetland plants of Kentucky. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort. Reprinted with permission of Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Asylum Lake Property
    WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: ASYLUM LAKE PROPERTY HISTORICAL USES AND LAND COVER, NATURAL FEATURES INVENTORY, AND HABITAT ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Submitted by Kalamazoo Nature Center October 2001 (Revised February 2002) WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: ASYLUM LAKE PROPERTY HISTORICAL USES AND LAND COVER, NATURAL FEATURES INVENTORY, AND HABITAT ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Submitted by Kalamazoo Nature Center (Research Department—Ray Adams, Tyler Bassett, Tricia Benson, Leslie Brown, Caroline Causey, Monica Evans, Megan Faurot, Connie Ferguson, Rob Klein, Theresa Mau-Crimmins, Katie Miller, Torrey Moss, Doug Powless, Michele Richards, Jason Schmidt, Jody Simoes; Community Wildlife Department—Steve Allen) October 2001 (Revised February 2002) Table of Contents Title # of Pages Executive Summary 3 History of the Property 3 Land Cover 7 Aquatic Ecosystem 6 Non-vascular Plants 3 Vascular Plants Vegetation Survey 8 Terrestrial Insects 7 Amphibians and Reptiles 3 Birds 4 Mammals 1 Habitat Enhancement Recommendations 17 Bibliography 5 Sources of Additional Information 5 Appendices Fieldwork Plan 2 Maps Map 1. Land Cover circa 1800 at the Asylum Lake Preserve and Adjacent Properties, Kalamazoo, Michigan Map 2. Current Land Cover at the Asylum Lake Preserve and Adjacent Properties, Kalamazoo, Michigan C:\asylum\03_Table of Contents.doc 3/1/02 Page 1 of 6 Map 3. Soils at the Asylum Lake Preserve and Adjacent Properties, Kalamazoo, Michigan Map 4. National Wetlands Inventory, Asylum Lake Preserve and Adjacent Properties, Kalamazoo, Michigan Map 5. Topographic Map of the Asylum Lake Preserve and Adjacent Properties, Kalamazoo, Michigan Map 6. Asylum Lake Bird Census Route Spring 2000 Map 7. Asylum Lake Property Small Mammal Live-Trapping Points Map 8. Suggested Future Land Cover at the Asylum Lake Preserve Emphasizing an Increase in Forested Acreage Map 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of Dallas County, Texas, United States
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS the Michigan Department of Natural Resources
    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Michigan Department of Natural Resources appreciates the valuable contributions made by many agencies, organizations and individuals during the development of this plan. In particular, we thank the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for providing funding and technical support. We also thank the Michigan Natural Features Inventory, who helped draft this Habitat Conservation Plan. Finally, we thank the members of the public who helped shape the content of this plan by offering input during public meetings and public-comment periods. lll A contribution of the Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund Grants Program, Michigan Project E-17-HCP and State Wildlife Grant F12AF01114. Equal Rights for Natural Resource Users The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) provides equal opportunities for employment and access to Michigan’s natural resources. Both State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, disability, age, sex, height, weight or marital status under the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, as amended (MI PA 453 and MI PA 220, Title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act). If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility, or if you desire additional information, please write the MDNR, HUMAN RESOURCES, PO BOX 30028, LANSING MI 48909-7528, or the MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS, STATE OF MICHIGAN PLAZA BUILDING, 1200 6TH STREET, DETROIT MI 48226, or the OFFICE FOR DIVERSITY AND CIVIL RIGHTS, US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, 4040 NORTH FAIRFAX DRIVE, ARLINGTON VA 22203. For information or assistance on this publication, contact: MDNR, WILDLIFE DIVISION, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Cypress Butterflies Harmonize with the Plants of the Swamp by Distributing Pollen on Their Bodies As They Fly from Plant to Plant in Search of Nectar
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Big Cypress National Preserve Florida Butterflies of the Swamp... The word “Butterfly” translated in most languages showcases beautiful rhythimic words that echo Big Cypress the beauty of the insect and its repetitive wing beats. For example, in Spanish: Mar-i-po’-sa, French: Papillon, German: Shmetterling, and Tamil: Butterflies Vannathi poochi to name a few. In Big Cypress butterflies harmonize with the plants of the swamp by distributing pollen on their bodies as they fly from plant to plant in search of nectar. Recommended Butterfly Sites Within the Preserve check out the Fire Prairie Trail Watching wildlife the off of Turner River Road, Gator Hook Trail, Florida responsible way... National Scenic Trail. Or take a stroll through The thrill of watching a wild animal in the Oasis Visitor Center native plant garden and observe butterflies fluttering from plant to plant. its native surroundings is spectacular and awe inspiring. While visiting Big The best time to see butterflies in the Preserve is Cypress National Preserve, or any other in the late summer and autumn months from late natural area, remember: August to mid-October. At this time there is a wide variety and abundance of butterflies. The winter months from November through February are • All wildlife is wild and unpredictable. more limited. In early spring the first generation Stay a safe distance from any wild of Gray Hairstreaks and swallowtails are first animal —15 feet is recommended. to appear. In late spring into summer butterfly • View wildlife with respect. numbers increase with new generatons.
    [Show full text]