DOCSLIB.ORG

Lecture Notes on the Major Soils of the World

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lecture Notes on the Major Soils of the World World Soil Resources Reports 94 ISSN 0532-0488 LECTURE NOTES ON THE MAJOR SOILS OF THE WORLD Catholic University of Leuven World Soil Resources Reports 94 LECTURE NOTES ON THE MAJOR SOILS OF THE WORLD Edited by: Paul Driessen, Wageningen Agricultural University, International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences (ITC), Jozef Deckers, Catholic University of Leuven Otto Spaargaren, International Soil Reference and Information Centre Freddy Nachtergaele, FAO FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2001 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ISBN 925-104637-9 All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product for educational or other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of material in this information product for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the copyright holders. Applications for such permission should be addressed to the Chief, Publishing and Multimedia Service, Information Division, FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy or by e-mail to [email protected] © FAO 2001 Preface After endorsement of the World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB) as a universal soil correlation tool by the International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS), the Reference Base (RB) working group has endeavoured to promote, test and improve the system further . The aim of this publication is to make the WRB available to young scientists at an affordable price. This text is published in conjunction with a CD-ROM that contains additional sample profiles, analytical data and virtual field excursions. The document and the CD-ROM are produced jointly by the Wageningen Agricultural University (Wageningen, The Netherlands), the International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences (ITC, Enschede, The Netherlands), the International Soil Reference and Information Centre (ISRIC, Wageningen, The Netherlands), the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences of the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Belgium) and FAO. This publication succeeds the Lecture notes on the major soils of the world by P.M. Driessen and R. Dudal, eds. (1991) which were based on the Legend of the FAO Soil Map of the World. For convenience, all WRB Reference Soil Groups are assembled in ten ‘sets’, each characterized by ‘dominant identifiers’, i.e. soil forming factor(s) which most clearly condition soil formation. Each Reference Soil Group is discussed with due attention to diagnostics, regional distribution, association with other Reference Soil Groups, genesis, characteristics (morphological, hydrological, physical and chemical), land use and management. iv Acknowledgements The editors wish to acknowledge the invaluable help of all individuals who participated in WRB field testing or contributed critical comments and suggestions. The following persons contributed to the text of these Notes (in alphabetical order): Berding, F.R. Gleysols, Umbrisols, Arenosols, Regosols, Andosols, Gypsisols, Calcisols, Durisols, Podzols , Qualifyer categories and their ranking Blume, H.P. Gleysols Brahy, V. Alisols Buurman, P. Podzols Deckers, J. A. Vertisols, Luvisols, Albeluvisols Delvaux, B. Alisols Driessen, P.M. Introduction, Histosols, Arenosols, Leptosols, Regosols, Cambisols, Plinthosols, Ferralsols, Nitisols, Acrisols, Lixisols, Solonchaks, Solonetz, Gypsisols, Calcisols, Chernozems, Kastanozems, Phaeozems, Planosols, final editing of all chapters Dudal, R. Critical review of the entire text, with special attention for Luvisols Langohr, R. Albeluvisols Mensvoort, M. van Gleysols, Fluvisols Nachtergaele, F. O. Qualifyers, maps, critical review of the entire text Spaargaren, O. C. Anthrosols Tarnocai, C. Cryosols Tebbens, L. All chapter on Major Landforms Veldkamp, T. All chapters on Major Landforms. Messrs J. P. Lesschen and N. Witte produced the CD-ROM. These lecture notes will be progressively improved. Suggestions for amendments or additions are most welcome. Rome, June, 2001 Lecture Notes on the Major Soils of the World v Contents page PREFACE INTRODUCTION 1 THE WORLD REFERENCE BASE FOR SOIL RESOURCES 11 The WRB as a soil correlation system 13 Rules for identifying soil units 13 Ranking qualifiers in soil unit names 14 Polygenetic and buried soils 15 REFERENCE SOIL GROUPS 17 SET 1. ORGANIC SOILS 19 Histosols 21 SET 2. MINERAL SOILS CONDITIONED BY MAN 35 Anthrosols 37 SET 3. MINERAL SOILS CONDITIONED BY PARENT MATERIAL 43 Major landforms in volcanic landscapes 45 Andosols 51 Major landforms in landscapes with sands 59 Arenosols 65 Major landforms in landscapes with expanding clays 73 Vertisols 75 SET 4. MINERAL SOILS CONDITIONED BY TOPOGRAPHY 89 Major landforms in alluvial lowlands 91 Fluvisols 105 Gleysols 115 Major landforms in mountains and formerly glaciated regions 121 Leptosols 125 Regosols 131 SET 5. MINERAL SOILS CONDITIONED BY LIMITED AGE 135 Cambisols 137 vi SET 6. MINERAL SOILS CONDITIONED BY A WET (SUB)TROPICAL CLIMATE 141 Major landforms in the (sub-)humid tropics 143 Plinthosols 149 Ferralsols 155 Alisols 163 Nitisols 171 Acrisols 177 Lixisols 181 SET 7. MINERAL SOILS CONDITIONED BY A (SEMI-)ARID CLIMATE 185 Major landforms in (semi-)arid regions 187 Solonchaks 191 Solonetz 201 Gypsisols 207 Durisols 211 Calcisols 215 SET 8. MINERAL SOILS CONDITIONED BY A STEPPIC CLIMATE 221 Major landforms in steppe regions 223 Chernozems 227 Kastanozems 233 Phaeozems 237 SET 9. MINERAL SOILS CONDITIONED BY A (SUB)HUMID TEMPERATE CLIMATE 241 Major landforms in (sub-)humid temperate regions 243 Podzols 247 Planosols 253 Albeluvisols 259 Luvisols 265 Umbrisols 271 SET 10. MINERAL SOILS CONDITIONED BY PERMAFROST 275 Cryosols 277 REFERENCES 285 ANNEXES 291 Annex 1. Key to Reference Soil Groups 293 Annex 2. Diagnostic horizons, properties and materials 299 Annex 3. Qualifiers (formative elements for naming soil units) 317 Annex 4. Suggestions for ranking qualifiers in soil unit names 329 Lecture Notes on the Major Soils of the World 1 Introduction The FAO-Unesco Soil Classification System The World Reference Base for soil resources Diagnostic horizons, properties and materials Lecture Notes on the Major Soils of the World 3 Introduction Soil is a 3-dimensional body with properties that reflect the impact of (1) climate, (2) vegetation, fauna, Man and (3) topography on the soil’s (4) parent material over a variable (5) time span. The nature and relative importance of each of these five ‘soil forming factors’ vary in time and in space. With few exceptions, soils are still in a process of change; they show in their ‘soil profile’ signs of differentiation or alteration of the soil material incurred in a process of soil formation or ‘pedogenesis’. Unlike plants and animals, which can be identified as separate entities, the world’s soil cover is a continuum. Its components occur in temporal and/or spatial successions. In the early days of soil science, soil classification was based on the (surmised) genesis of the soils. Many ‘traditional’ soil names refer to the soil forming factor considered to be dominant in a particular pedogenetic history, for instance ‘desert soils’ (climate being the dominant factor), ‘plaggen soils’ (human interference), ‘prairie soils’ (vegetation), ‘mountain soils’ (topography), or ‘volcanic ash soils’ (parent material). Alternatively, soil names referred to a prominent single factor, for instance ‘Brown Soils’ (colour), ‘alkali soils’ (chemical characteristic), ‘hydromorphic soils’ (physical characteristic), ‘sandy soils’ (texture) or ‘lithosols’ (depth). The many soil classification schemes developed over the years reflect different views held on concepts of soil formation and mirror differences of opinion about the criteria to be used for classification. In the 1950’s, international communications intensified while the number of soil surveys increased sharply both in temperate regions and in the tropics. The experience gained in those years and the exchange of data between scientists rekindled interest in (the dynamics of) the world’s soil cover. Classification systems were developed, which aimed at embracing the full spectrum of the soil continuum. In addition, emphasis shifted away from the genetic approach, which often contained an element of conjecture, to the use of soil properties as differentiating criteria. By and large, consensus evolved as to the major soil bodies which needed to be distinguished in broad level soil classification although differences in definitions and terminology remained. THE FAO-UNESCO SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM In 1974, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) published its Soil Map of the World (SMW). Compilation of the SMW was a formidable task involving collection and correlation of soil information from all over the world. Initially, the Legend to the SMW consisted of 26 (‘first level’) “Major Soil Groupings” comprising a total of 106 (‘second level’) ‘Soil Units’. In 1990, a ‘Revised Legend’ was published and a third hierarchical level of ‘Soil Subunits’ was introduced to support soil inventory at larger scales. Soil Subunits were not
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eletrochemical Changes in Gleysol of the Amazon Estuary
    http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rca.1796 ORIGINAL ARTICLE George Rodrigues da Silva1* Paulo Augusto Lobato da Silva2 Sérgio Brazão e Silva1 Mário Lopes da Silva Junior1 Eletrochemical changes in Gleysol of the Marcos André Piedade Gama1 Antonio Rodrigues Fernandes1 Amazon estuary Alterações eletroquímicas em Gleissolo do estuário 1 Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia – UFRA, Instituto de Ciências Agrárias, Av. Presidente Tancredo Neves, 2501, 66077-830, Belém, PA, amazônico Brasil 2 Empresa de Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural do Estado do Pará – EMATER/PA, Rodovia BR- 316, km 12, s/n, 67105-970, Ananindeua, PA, ABSTRACT: Electrochemical reactions are intensified by soil flooding, which changes Brasil the dynamics of nutrients and negatively affects plant growth. In this work, we aimed to Corresponding Author: evaluate the changes in the redox potential (Eh), pH and nutrient availability in a Haplic E-mail: [email protected] Gleysol soil from a floodplain of the Guamá River, Belém, Pará State. During the period of floods (61 days), samples soils were collected on alternate days and analyzed in dry and wet conditions. Flooding resulted in higher pH values and decreased Eh, which stabilized after 32 days of flooding and did not affect the values of total nitrogen. An increase in the KEYWORDS Oxidation-reduction concentrations of phosphorus, sulfur, iron, manganese, copper and zinc were observed, and Availability of nutrients they were subsequently reduced with time of submergence. The reduction of sulfur occurred Waterlogged soils at low Eh and pH values near neutrality. The results show that nitrogen and sulfur do not limit agricultural production in the lowland soils of the Guamá River.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Properties, and Soil Organic Carbon Stocks of Tropical Andosol Under Different Land Uses
    Open Journal of Soil Science, 2013, 3, 153-162 153 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2013.33018 Published Online July 2013 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojss) Soil Properties, and Soil Organic Carbon Stocks of Tropical Andosol under Different Land Uses Girma Abera*, Endalkachew Wolde-Meskel School of Plant and Horticultural Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia. Email: *girmajibat2006 @yahoo.com Received December 21st, 2012; revised April 21st, 2013; accepted April 29th, 2013 Copyright © 2013 Girma Abera, Endalkachew Wolde-Meskel. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ABSTRACT Land use effect of tropical Andosol, with two from crop lands (Site 1 and Site 2) and one from Agroforestry coffee plantation (Site 3) was explored under laboratory conditions to understand their physical, chemical and biological prop- erties and soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks from the rift valley of Ethiopia. Site 3 that acquired less cultivation than others exhibited better aggregate size fraction (AF, 55%), higher aggregate stability (AS, 91%), and greater active mi- crobial biomass (AMB), reflecting better soil structure development. Comparatively, higher total carbon (TC), organic carbon (OC) and total nitrogen (TN) concentrations were recorded in bulk soils and microaggregate fractions of Site 2 and Site 3 than in intensively cultivated Site 1. As expected, microaggregate fractions displayed greater OC and TN than bulk soils across all land uses. Site 1 revealed higher metabolic quotient (qCO2) and lower SOC stock (2.1 Mg·ha−1), suggesting microbial stress, while micro nutrients deficiencies were observed with the alkaline soil (Site 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Soil Chiseling on Soil Structure and Root Growth for a Clayey Soil Under No-Tillage
    Geoderma 259–260 (2015) 149–155 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Geoderma journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geoderma Effect of soil chiseling on soil structure and root growth for a clayey soil under no-tillage Márcio Renato Nunes a,⁎, José Eloir Denardin b, Eloy Antônio Pauletto c, Antônio Faganello b, Luiz Fernando Spinelli Pinto c a University of São Paulo, “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture, Avenida Pádua Dias, 11, CEP 13418-900 Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil b Embrapa Trigo, Rodovia BR 285, km. 294, P.O. Box 451, CEP 99001-970 Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil c Federal University of Pelotas, Department of Soil Science, Campus Universitário s/n, P.O. Box 354, 96010-900 Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil article info abstract Article history: Soil chiseling under no-tillage (NT) promotes root growth in depth. This practice, however, might affect soil ag- Received 11 November 2014 gregation. This study evaluated the chiseling effects on the aggregation of a Ferralic Nitisol (Rhodic), under NT, in Received in revised form 2 June 2015 humid subtropical climate region. The treatments carried out consisted of the time that soil was kept under NT Accepted 3 June 2015 after chiseling: continuous NT for 24 months after chiseling in September 2009; continuous NT for 18 months Available online xxxx after chiseling in March 2010; continuous NT for 12 months after chiseling in September 2010; continuous NT for 6 months after chiseling in March 2011; NT in newly chiseling soil in September 2011; continuous NT without Keywords: Soil physical attributes chiseling (control).
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Loess-Derived Soil Along a Topo-Climatic Sequence in The
    European Journal of Soil Science, May 2017, 68, 270–280 doi: 10.1111/ejss.12425 Evolution of loess-derived soil along a climatic toposequence in the Qilian Mountains, NE Tibetan Plateau F. Yanga,c ,L.M.Huangb,c,D.G.Rossitera,d,F.Yanga,c,R.M.Yanga,c & G. L. Zhanga,c aState Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, NO. 71 East Beijing Road, Xuanwu District, Nanjing 210008, China, bKey Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 11(A), Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China, cUniversity of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.19(A) Yuquan Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing 100049, China, and dSchool of Integrative Plant Sciences, Section of Soil and Crop Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca NY 14853, USA Summary Holocene loess has been recognized as the primary source of the silty topsoil in the northeast Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. The processes through which these uniform loess sediments develop into diverse types of soil remain unclear. In this research, we examined 23 loess-derived soil samples from the Qilian Mountains with varying amounts of pedogenic modification. Soil particle-size distribution and non-calcareous mineralogy were changed only slightly because of the weak intensity of chemical weathering. Accumulation of soil organic carbon (SOC) and leaching of carbonate were both identified as predominant pedogenic responses to soil forming processes. Principal component analysis and structural analysis revealed the strong correlations between soil carbon (SOC and carbonate) and several soil properties related to soil functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiji)Iji) Uusingsing Tthehe UUSLESLE Mmodelodel Andand a GISGIS
    COMPONENT 1A - Project 1A4 Integrated Coastal Management - GERSA Project Spatial Approach - Remote Sensing September 2008 TECHNICAL REPORT MMappingapping PotentialPotential EErosionrosion RRisksisks iinn NNorthorth VVitiiti LLevuevu (FFiji)iji) uusingsing tthehe UUSLESLE MModelodel andand a GISGIS AAuthor:uthor: JJuliaulia PPRINTEMPSRINTEMPS Photo : Julia PRINTEMPS The CRISP programme is implemented as part of the policy developed by the Secretariat of the Pacifi c Regional Environment Programme for a contribution to conservation and sustainable development of coral reefs in the Pacifi c. he Initiative for the Protection and Management of Coral Reefs in the Pacifi c T (CRISP), sponsored by France and prepared by the French Development Agency (AFD) as part of an inter-ministerial project from 2002 onwards, aims to develop a vision for the future of these unique eco-systems and the communities that depend on them and to introduce strategies and projects to conserve their biodiversity, while developing the economic and environmental services that they provide both locally and globally. Also, it is designed as a factor for integration between developed countries (Australia, New Zealand, Japan and USA), French overseas territories and Pacifi c Island developing countries. The CRISP Programme comprises three major components, which are: Component 1A: Integrated Coastal Management and Watershed Management - 1A1: Marine biodiversity conservation planning - 1A2: Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) - 1A3: Institutional strengthening and networking -
    [Show full text]
  • Sorption and Desorption of Vanadate, Arsenate and Chromate by Two Volcanic Soils of Equatorial Africa
    Article Sorption and Desorption of Vanadate, Arsenate and Chromate by Two Volcanic Soils of Equatorial Africa Sara Gonzalez-Rodriguez 1 and Maria Luisa Fernandez-Marcos 1,2,* 1 Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain; [email protected] 2 Institute of Agricultural Biodiversity and Rural Development, University of Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Sorption of oxyanions by soils and mineral surfaces is of interest due to their role as nutrients or pollutants. Volcanic soils are variable charge soils, rich in active forms of aluminum and iron, and capable of sorbing anions. Sorption and desorption of vanadate, arsenate, and chromate by two African andosols was studied in laboratory experiments. Sorption isotherms were determined by equilibrating at 293 K soil samples with oxyanion solutions of concentrations between 0 and 100 mg L−1 V, As, or Cr, equivalent to 0−2.0 mmol V L−1, 0−1.3 mmol As L−1, and −1 0−1.9 mmol Cr L , in NaNO3; V, As, or Cr were determined by ICP-mass spectrometry in the equilibrium solution. After sorption, the soil samples were equilibrated with 0.02 M NaNO3 to study desorption. The isotherms were adjusted to mathematical models. After desorption with NaNO3, desorption experiments were carried out with a 1 mM phosphate. The sorption of vanadate and arsenate was greater than 90% of the amount added, while the chromate sorption was much lower (19–97%). The sorption by the Silandic Andosol is attributed to non-crystalline Fe and Al, while in Citation: Gonzalez-Rodriguez, S.; the Vitric Andosol, crystalline iron species play a relevant role.
    [Show full text]
  • Prairie Wetland Soils: Gleysolic and Organic Angela Bedard-Haughn Department of Soil Science, University of Saskatchewan
    PS&C Prairie Soils & Crops Journal Agricultural Soils of the Prairies Prairie Wetland Soils: Gleysolic and Organic Angela Bedard-Haughn Department of Soil Science, University of Saskatchewan Summary Gleysolic and Organic soils are collectively referred to as “wetland soils”. They are found in wet low-lying or level landscape positions. Gleysolic soils are found throughout the agricultural Prairies, in association with Chernozemic and Luvisolic soils. In semi-arid regions, they are frequently tilled in dry years and can be very productive due to their relatively high levels of soil moisture and nutrients. In the Prairie Provinces, Organic soils tend to be mostly associated with the Boreal transition zones at the northern and eastern perimeter of the Prairies. With proper management, these can also provide productive agricultural land, particularly for forages. Introduction Soils of the Gleysolic and Organic orders are collectively referred to as “wetland soils”. Soil maps of the agricultural region of the Canadian Prairies seldom have areas mapped as dominantly Gleysolic8 or Organic9; however, these soils are found throughout the region wherever climate and/or topography have led to persistent water-saturated conditions. Gleysols are mineral soils with colors that reflect intermittent or prolonged anaerobic (i.e., saturated, low oxygen) conditions (Fig. 1A). Organic soils reflect permanent anaerobic conditions, which lead to soils that are made up of variably decomposed plant residues, mostly from water-tolerant (i.e., hydrophytic) vegetation (Fig. 1B). Figure 1: A) Humic Luvic Gleysol, Saskatchewan and B) Typic Fibrisol (Organic), Manitoba7. Of the some 100,000,000 ha covered by the Canada Land Inventory (CLI) in the Prairie Provinces12, Gleysolic soils occupy less than 15% of the Prairie ecoregions and up to 40% in the Mid-Boreal (boreal = “northern”) Upland (Alberta) and Interlake Plain (Manitoba) ecoregions12.
    [Show full text]
  • World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014 International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps
    ISSN 0532-0488 WORLD SOIL RESOURCES REPORTS 106 World reference base for soil resources 2014 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps Update 2015 Cover photographs (left to right): Ekranic Technosol – Austria (©Erika Michéli) Reductaquic Cryosol – Russia (©Maria Gerasimova) Ferralic Nitisol – Australia (©Ben Harms) Pellic Vertisol – Bulgaria (©Erika Michéli) Albic Podzol – Czech Republic (©Erika Michéli) Hypercalcic Kastanozem – Mexico (©Carlos Cruz Gaistardo) Stagnic Luvisol – South Africa (©Márta Fuchs) Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: SALES AND MARKETING GROUP Information Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Fax: (+39) 06 57053360 Web site: http://www.fao.org WORLD SOIL World reference base RESOURCES REPORTS for soil resources 2014 106 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps Update 2015 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2015 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Management Requirements KSLA November 22, 2011
    Soil management requirements KSLA November 22, 2011 by Mats Olsson Department of Soil and Environment, SLU matlts.olsson@ @lslu.se Land use and land management must be sustainable That means e.g. • All ecosystem services have to be considered in a long term ppperspective Land use and land management must be sustainable That means e.g. • All ecosystem services has to be considered in a long term ppperspective • Use and management must be site adapted Soil is a diverse concept – and so is soil management Cryosols Leptosols Cambisols Arenosols Acrisols Calcisols Ferralsols Properties are set by: Gleyso ls Luvisols Podzols Kastanozems Lixisols 1. Topography Fluvisols Histosols 2. Climate Vertisols Albeluvisols Regosols 3. Geology Solonchaks Chernozems 4. Biota and land use Alisols Nitisols 5. Time Phaeozems Stagnosols Solonetz Planosols Andosols Gypsisols Umbrisols Global: 15 300 Mha Plinthosols Durisols Technosols From: World Reference Base for Anthrosols Soil Resources, 2006 Land use and land management must be sustainable That means e.g. • All ecosystem services has to be considered in a long term ppperspective • Use and management must be site adapted • A system analyses ppperspective should be applied Wheat production at different N fertilizing rates, SdSweden, k/h*kg/ha*yr From Lennart Mattsson, 2004 Wheat production at different N fertilizing rates, SdSweden, k/h*kg/ha*yr • Low margilinal impact on production • High negative environmental consequences From Lennart Mattsson, 2004 Fertilizer use, kg perha*yr Netherlands Vietnam Japan
    [Show full text]
  • Kaolinite Dating from Acrisol and Ferralsol
    Kaolinite dating from Acrisol and Ferralsol: A new key to understanding the landscape evolution in NW Amazonia (Brazil) Maximilien Mathian, Guilherme Taitson Bueno, Etienne Balan, Emmanuel Fritsch, Nádia Regina Do Nascimento, Madeleine Selo, Thierry Allard To cite this version: Maximilien Mathian, Guilherme Taitson Bueno, Etienne Balan, Emmanuel Fritsch, Nádia Regina Do Nascimento, et al.. Kaolinite dating from Acrisol and Ferralsol: A new key to understand- ing the landscape evolution in NW Amazonia (Brazil). Geoderma, Elsevier, 2020, 370, pp.114354. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114354. hal-03047287 HAL Id: hal-03047287 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03047287 Submitted on 14 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 Kaolinite dating from Acrisol and Ferralsol: a new key to 2 understanding the landscape evolution in NW Amazonia (Brazil) 3 4 Maximilien Mathian1, Guilherme Taitson Bueno2, Etienne Balan1, Emmanuel Fritsch1, Nádia 5 Regina do Nascimento3, Madeleine Selo1, Thierry Allard1 6 7 1Sorbonne Université, Institut de minéralogie, de physique des matériaux et de cosmochimie, UMR 8 CNRS 7590, IRD, MNHN, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 4 Place Jussieu, 75005, France 9 2Federal University of Goiás - UFG, Instituto de Estudos Socioambientais, Av.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Treated Wastewater Irrigation on Soil Salinity and Sodicity in Sfax (Tunisia): a Case Study"
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Érudit Article "Effects of treated wastewater irrigation on soil salinity and sodicity in Sfax (Tunisia): A case study" Nebil Belaid, Catherine Neel, Monem Kallel, Tarek Ayoub, Abdel Ayadi, et Michel Baudu Revue des sciences de l'eau / Journal of Water Science, vol. 23, n° 2, 2010, p. 133-146. Pour citer cet article, utiliser l'information suivante : URI: http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/039905ar DOI: 10.7202/039905ar Note : les règles d'écriture des références bibliographiques peuvent varier selon les différents domaines du savoir. Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d'auteur. L'utilisation des services d'Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d'utilisation que vous pouvez consulter à l'URI https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l'Université de Montréal, l'Université Laval et l'Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. Érudit offre des services d'édition numérique de documents scientifiques depuis 1998. Pour communiquer avec les responsables d'Érudit : [email protected] Document téléchargé le 13 février 2017 01:03 EFFECTS OF TREATED WASTEWATER IRRIGATION ON SOIL SALINITY AND SODICITY IN SFAX (TUNISIA): A CASE STUDY Effets de l’irrigation par les eaux usées traitées sur la salinité et la sodicité des sols de Sfax (Tunisie): Un cas d’étude Nebil belaid1,2 , CatheriNe Neel2*, MoNeM Kallel3,
    [Show full text]
  • Soils Diversity Iberian Peninsula
    SOILS DIVERSITY IN THE SOUTHWEST OF IBERIAN PENINSULA Beatriz Ramírez1; Luís Fernández-Pozo1; José Cabezas1; Rui Alexandre Castanho1*; Luís Loures2 1 Environmental Resources Analysis Research Group (ARAM). University of Extremadura. Badajoz. Spain. 2 ESAE – Portalegre Polytechnic School, Portugal and Research Centre for Spatial and Organizational Dynamics (CIEO), University of Algarve, Portugal. * Presenter | 28.04.2017 |Room 2.20 authors contacts: [email protected] | [email protected]| joca fer @unex.es | [email protected] | [email protected] INTRODUCTION An increase in the development of Digital Soil Cartography methods has been noticed in recent decades. The proposal put forward by the World Reference Base for Soil Resource (WRB) (FAO, 1998) establishes that, for the World Map Soils, a first level with 30 soils typologies and for the second 531. In Europe, the development of this mapping has been coordinated by European Soil Bureau Network (ESBN), the European Environment Agency (EEA) and also by Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), identifying 26 first level soils typologies and 134 from the second level. INTRODUCTION Taking as reference the mentioned soil map, the research group have been studied the pedodiversity in the Southwest of Iberian Peninsula (Euro region Alentejo-Centro- Extremadura, EUROACE) through the use of Geographical Information Systems and diversity algorithms. The pedodiversity concept, takes its origin in ecological measures and defines, according to Ibañez et al., (1998): “the soil variability in a specific area or region, determined by its constitution, types, attributes and the conditions in which the different types of soils were formed ". The edafodiversity analysis, using diversity indexes, has allowed to approach in a quantitative and rigorous way the soils geography, and also enable to classify to the edafo-rate according to their spatial distribution typologies.
    [Show full text]