DOCSLIB.ORG

Groundwater Availability Model for the West Texas Bolsons (Red Light Draw, Green River Valley, and Eagle Flat) Aquifer in Texas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Groundwater Availability Model for the West Texas Bolsons (Red Light Draw, Green River Valley, and Eagle Flat) Aquifer in Texas Final Report Groundwater Availability Model for the West Texas Bolsons (Red Light Draw, Green River Valley, and Eagle Flat) Aquifer in Texas Texas Water Development Board Prepared for the P.O. Box 1321, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711-3231 November 2008 Prepared by: James A. Beach, P.G. Leigh Symank Yun Huang John B. Ashworth, P.G. Tyler Davidson, P.E. Eddie W. Collins, P.G. Barry J. Hibbs, Ph.D. Bruce K. Darling, Ph.D., P.G. Kevin Urbancyk, Ph.D., P.G. Kenny Calhoun Steve Finch, P.G. M e x T i c e o x a s R i o G r a n d e Hudspeth Co. J e P f r f e Culberson Co. D s i a d v i o i s Texas Water Development Board Final Report Groundwater Availability Model For the West Texas Bolsons (Red Light Draw, Green River Valley and Eagle Flat) Aquifer in Texas Prepared by: James A. Beach, P.G. Leigh Symank Yun Huang John B. Ashworth, P.G. Tyler Davidson, P.E. LBG-Guyton Associates Eddie W. Collins, P.G. Bureau of Economic Geology Barry J. Hibbs, Ph.D. University of California Bruce K. Darling, Ph.D., P.G. Southwest Groundwater Consulting, LLC Kevin Urbancyk, Ph.D, P.G. Sul Ross State University Kenny Calhoun Daniel B. Stephens and Associates, Inc. Steve Finch John Shomaker and Associates, Inc. November 2008 GEOSCIENTIST AND ENGINEERING SEAL This report documents the work of the following Licensed Texas Geoscientists or Licensed Texas Professional Engineers: James A. Beach, P.G. Mr. Beach was the Project Manager and was responsible for overseeing the development of the conceptual model, and for development and calibration of the numerical model. Tyler Davidson, P.E. Mr. Davidson was responsible for the evaluation of hydraulic properties and water quality in the conceptual model. John Ashworth, P.G. Mr. Ashworth was responsible for helping integrate the geologic structure into the numerical model. Eddie W. Collins, P.G. Mr. Collins was responsible for development of the conceptual geologic structure in the model area. iaJij Bruce K. Darling, Ph.D., P.G. Dr. Darling was responsible for geology sections in the report. /a261 Steven Finch, P.G. Mr. Finch was responsible for estimates for the model. Groundwater Availability Model for the West Texas Bolsons (Red Light Draw, Green River Valley, and Eagle Flat) Aquifer in Texas TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Location............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Physiography ..................................................................................................... 2-9 2.3 Climate ............................................................................................................ 2-15 2.4 Vegetation and Land Use ................................................................................ 2-23 2.5 Geology ........................................................................................................... 2-26 3.0 PREVIOUS WORK ........................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Hydrogeologic Framework................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Groundwater Models......................................................................................... 3-2 4.0 HYDROLOGIC SETTING ............................................................................ 4-1 4.1 Hydrostratigraphy.............................................................................................. 4-1 4.1.1 Red Light Draw........................................................................................ 4-2 4.1.2 Northwest Eagle Flat................................................................................ 4-3 4.1.3 Southeast Eagle Flat................................................................................. 4-4 4.1.4 Green River Valley .................................................................................. 4-4 4.2 Structure ............................................................................................................ 4-5 4.2.1 Data Sources............................................................................................ 4-5 4.2.2 Construction of the Structural Surfaces ................................................... 4-6 4.2.3 Discussion of Structure............................................................................ 4-6 4.3 Water Levels and Regional Groundwater Flow .............................................. 4-12 4.3.1 Hydrographs........................................................................................... 4-13 4.3.2 Groundwater Flow................................................................................. 4-13 4.3.3 Potentiometric Map................................................................................ 4-17 4.3.4 Flow Systems......................................................................................... 4-20 4.3.5 Vertical Flow......................................................................................... 4-23 4.4 Recharge.......................................................................................................... 4-25 4.4.1 Recharge Areas...................................................................................... 4-25 4.4.2 Recharge Estimates from Previous Work.............................................. 4-26 4.4.3 Summary of Recharge Method .............................................................. 4-28 4.4.4 Recharge Estimates................................................................................ 4-30 4.5 Rivers, Streams, Springs and Lakes ................................................................ 4-35 4.6 Hydraulic Properties........................................................................................ 4-38 4.6.1 Hydraulic Conductivity.......................................................................... 4-38 4.6.2 Storage Properties.................................................................................. 4-39 4.7 Discharge......................................................................................................... 4-42 4.8 Water Quality.................................................................................................. 4-50 i 5.0 CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF FLOW IN WEST TEXAS BOLSON AQUIFERS..................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Conceptual model.............................................................................................. 5-1 6.0 MODEL DESIGN............................................................................................ 6-1 6.1 Code and Processor ........................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Model Layers and Grid...................................................................................... 6-2 6.3 Model Parameters............................................................................................ 6-11 6.3.1 Hydraulic Conductivity.......................................................................... 6-11 6.3.2 Storage Coefficients............................................................................... 6-12 6.4 Model Boundaries........................................................................................... 6-13 6.4.1 Lateral Boundaries................................................................................. 6-13 6.4.2 Vertical Boundaries............................................................................... 6-18 6.4.3 Streams and Springs............................................................................... 6-18 6.4.4 Recharge and Evapotranspiration .......................................................... 6-18 6.4.5 Pumping Discharge................................................................................ 6-19 7.0 MODELING APPROACH............................................................................. 7-1 7.1 Calibration ......................................................................................................... 7-1 7.1.1 Approach.................................................................................................. 7-1 7.1.2 Calibration Targets and Measures ........................................................... 7-2 7.1.3 Calibration Target Uncertainty................................................................ 7-4 7.2 Sensitivity Analyses.......................................................................................... 7-5 8.0 STEADY-STATE MODEL ............................................................................ 8-1 8.1 Calibration ......................................................................................................... 8-1 8.1.1 Calibration Targets...................................................................................8-1 8.1.2 Horizontal and Vertical Hydraulic Conductivities .................................. 8-1 8.1.3 Recharge .................................................................................................. 8-8 8.1.4 Groundwater Evapotranspiration............................................................. 8-8 8.1.5 General Head Boundaries ........................................................................ 8-8 8.1.6 Calibration Results and Statistics..........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Salado Formation Followed
    GW -^SZ-i^ GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE YEAR(S): B. QUICK, Inc. 3340 Quail View Drive • Nashville, TN 37214 Phone: (615) 874-1077 • Fax: (615) 386-0110 Email: [email protected] November 12,2002 Mr Roger Anderson Environmental Bureau Chief New Mexico OCD 1220 S. ST. Francis Dr. 1 Santa Fe, NM 87507 Re: Class I Disposal Wells Dear Roger, I am still very interested in getting the disposal wells into salt caverns in Monument approved by OCD. It is my sincere belief that a Class I Disposal Well would be benefical to present and future industry in New Mexico. I suspect that one of my problems has been my distance from the property. I am hoping to find a local company or individuals who can be more on top of this project. In the past conditions have not justified the capital investment to permit, build and operate these wells and compete with surface disposal. Have there been any changes in OCD policy that might effect the permitting of these wells? If so, would you please send me any pretinent documents? Sincerely, Cc: Lori Wrotenbery i aoie or moments rage i uu Ctoraeferiz&MoiHi ©ff Bedded Satt fltoir Storage Caverns Case Stundy from the Midlamdl Basim Susan D. Hovorka Bureau of Economic Geology The University of Texas at Austin AUG1 0R9 9 Environmental Bureau Introduction to the Problem °" Conservation D/ws/on About solution-mined caverns l^Btg*** Geolojy_ofsalt Purpose, scope, and methods of our study Previous work: geologic setting of the bedded salt in the Permian Basin J^rV^W^' " Stratigraphic Units and Type Logs s Midland Basin stratigraphy
    [Show full text]
  • Dissolution of Permian Salado Salt During Salado Time in the Wink Area, Winkler County, Texas Kenneth S
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/44 Dissolution of Permian Salado salt during Salado time in the Wink area, Winkler County, Texas Kenneth S. Johnson, 1993, pp. 211-218 in: Carlsbad Region (New Mexico and West Texas), Love, D. W.; Hawley, J. W.; Kues, B. S.; Austin, G. S.; Lucas, S. G.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 44th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 357 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1993 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks.
    [Show full text]
  • Play Analysis and Digital Portfolio of Major Oil Reservoirs in the Permian Basin
    Play Analysis and Digital Portfolio of Major Oil Reservoirs in the Permian Basin: Application and Transfer of Advanced Geological and Engineering Technologies for Incremental Production Opportunities Final Report Reporting Period Start Date: January 14, 2002 Reporting Period End Date: May 13, 2004 Shirley P. Dutton, Eugene M. Kim, Ronald F. Broadhead, Caroline L. Breton, William D. Raatz, Stephen C. Ruppel, and Charles Kerans May 2004 Work Performed under DE-FC26-02NT15131 Prepared by Bureau of Economic Geology John A. and Katherine G. Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin University Station, P.O. Box X Austin, TX 78713-8924 and New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Socorro, NM 87801-4681 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability for responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. iii ABSTRACT The Permian Basin of west Texas and southeast New Mexico has produced >30 Bbbl (4.77 × 109 m3) of oil through 2000, most of it from 1,339 reservoirs having individual cumulative production >1 MMbbl (1.59 × 105 m3).
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Kitchen Cove 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Eddy County, New Mexico by Colin T
    Geologic Map of the Kitchen Cove 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Eddy County, New Mexico By Colin T. Cikoski1 1New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801 June 2019 New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Open-file Digital Geologic Map OF-GM 276 Scale 1:24,000 This work was supported by the U.S. Geological Survey, National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program (STATEMAP) under USGS Cooperative Agreement G18AC00201 and the New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources. New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, New Mexico, 87801-4796 The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the author and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government or the State of New Mexico. Executive Summary The Kitchen Cove quadrangle lies along the northwestern margin of the Guadalupian Delaware basin southwest of Carlsbad, New Mexico. The oldest rocks exposed are Guadalupian (upper Permian) carbonate rocks of the Seven Rivers Formation of the Artesia Group, which is sequentially overlain by similar strata of the Yates and Tansill Formations of the same Group. Each of these consists dominantly of dolomitic beds with lesser fine-grained siliciclastic intervals, which accumulated in a marine or marginal-marine backreef or shelf environment. These strata grade laterally basinward (here, eastward) either at the surface or in the subsurface into the Capitan Limestone, a massive fossiliferous “reef complex” that lay along the Guadalupian Delaware basin margin and is locally exposed on the quadrangle at the mouths of Dark Canyon and Kitchen Cove.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsurface Petroleum Geology of Santa Rosa Sandstone (Triassic), Northeast New Mexico
    COVER—Well-developed primary porosity in Santa Rosa sandstone, 800-810 ft, Husky Oil Co. and General Crude Oil Co. No. 1 Hanchett State, Sec. 16, T. 8 N., R. 24 E., Guadalupe County, New Mexico. Circular 193 New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources A DIVISION OF NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY Subsurface petroleum geology of Santa Rosa Sandstone (Triassic), northeast New Mexico by Ronald F. Broadhead New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources SOCORRO 1984 111 Contents A B S T R A C T 5 DOCKUM SEDIMENTOLOGY 13 INTRODUCTION 5 STRUCTURE 15 PETROLEUM METHODS OF INVESTIGATION 5 OCCURRENCES 17 STRATIGRAPHY 9 PETROGRAPHY AND RESERVOIR SAN ANDRES FORMATION (PERMIAN: GE OL O G Y 1 7 LEONARDIAN) 9 LOWER SANDSTONE UNIT OF SANTA ROSA ARTESIA GROUP (PERMIAN: GUADALUPIAN) 9 SANDSTONE 19 Grayburg-Queen unit 9 UPPER SANDSTONE UNIT OF SANTA ROSA Seven Rivers Formation 10 SANDSTONE 19 Yates-Tansill unit 10 CUERVO MEMBER OF CHINLE FORMATION 19 BERNAL FORMATION PETROLEUM POTENTIAL OF SANTA ROSA (PERMIAN: GUADALUPIAN) 10 SANDSTONE AND CUERVO MEMBER OF DOCKUM GROUP (TRIASSIC) 11 CHINLE FORMATION 20 Santa Rosa Sandstone 11 SANTA ROSA SANDSTONE 20 Lower sandstone unit 12 CUERVO MEMBER OF CHINLE Middle mudstone unit 12 FORMATION 21 REFERENCES 21 Upper sandstone unit 12 Chinle Formation 13 Lower shale member 13 Cuervo Sandstone Member 13 Upper shale member 13 Redonda Formation 13 Figures 1—Study area and locations of tar-sand deposits 6 2—Stratigraphic chart of Upper Permian and Triassic rocks in northeast New Mexico 9 3—(in pocket)—East-west
    [Show full text]
  • Capitan Reef Complex Structure and Stratigraphy
    Capitan Reef Complex Structure and Stratigraphy Report by Allan Standen, P.G. Steve Finch, P.G. Randy Williams, P.G., Beronica Lee-Brand, P.G. Assisted by Paul Kirby Texas Water Development Board Contract Number 0804830794 September 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive summary....................................................................................................................1 2. Introduction................................................................................................................................2 3. Study area geology.....................................................................................................................4 3.1 Stratigraphy ........................................................................................................................4 3.1.1 Bone Spring Limestone...........................................................................................9 3.1.2 San Andres Formation ............................................................................................9 3.1.3 Delaware Mountain Group .....................................................................................9 3.1.4 Capitan Reef Complex..........................................................................................10 3.1.5 Artesia Group........................................................................................................11 3.1.6 Castile and Salado Formations..............................................................................11 3.1.7 Rustler Formation
    [Show full text]
  • "Geology & Ground-Water Conditions in Southern Lea County, New
    ItI *1. I.4 GROUND-WTATER REPORT 6 an4 A.; Geology and Ground-Water 54 Conditions in Southern I Lea County, New Mexico by ALEXANDER NICHOLSON, Jr. C,'I and ALFRLD CLEBSCH, JR. UN!TED STATES GEOLOGICAL SUR'VEY i I I i i I i I' ;it it. STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES .t64 NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS STATION SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO Contents Page NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY ABSTRACT ............................................. 1 E. J. Workman, President INTRODUCTION ....................................... 2 Location and area ....................................... 2 History and scope of investigation ......................... 2 STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Previous investigations and acknowledgments ............... 4 Well-numbering system ................................. 5 Alvin J. Thompson, Direclor GEOGRAPHY ............... 7 Topography and drainage ................................ 7 Mescalero Ridge and High Plains ....................... 7 THE REGENTS Querecho Plains and Laguna Valley ..................... 9 Grama Ridge area ..................................... 11 MEEMBERS Ex OFFICIO Eunice Plain ......................................... 12 Monument Draw ................................... 12 TheHonorable Edwin L. Mechern ...... Governor of New Mexico Rattlesnake Ridge area ................................ 13 Tom Wiley ............. Superintendent of Public Instruction San Simon Swale ...................................... 13 Antelope Ridge area .................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Apache Mountains, Trans-Pecos Texas
    GEOLOGY OF APACHE MOUNTAINS, TRANS-PECOS TEXAS John William Wood University of Texas, Ph.D. thesis, 241 p., 10 sections, 6 diagrams, 40 photos, June, 1965. ABSTRACT The Apache Mountains of southeastern Culberson County, Texas, are com- posed of Permian marine rocks deposited over truncated Paleozoic formations along part of the southwest margin of the Delaware Basin. The western sector of the range, a broadly developed half-dome, is dominated by modified horst-and-graben structure superposed on shelf, shelf-margin, and basin facies ranging in age from Leonardian to Ochoan. The eastern two-thirds of the range is an exhumed Guadalupian reef complex, the surface structure of which is the elongate, southeast-plunging Apache anticline. The oldest exposed rocks are Leonardian in age and compose the upper part of the Victorio Peak Limestone. The VictorioPeakcrops out in an isolated ridge at the western end of the range. The siltstone, dolomite, and limestone within the unit probably formed as shallow-watershelf-margin deposits. In the same ridge, the Victorio Peak is conformably overlain by shale, silt stone, and lime- stone of the Cutoff Shale. The age of at least the upper part of the Cutoff is Guadalupian. As a result of uplift, erosion, and subsequent subsidence a tongue of Cherry Canyon basin- facies oversteps trucated Cutoff beds. The Munn Formationcrops out along the western base of the range and makes up the southwestern ridges. The two members of the Munn are composed of dolomite, siltstone, and limestone deposited as shelf and shelf-margin facies. The "backbone" of the Apache Mountains is a southeast trending, massive carbonate lithosome, the Capitan Limestone, which is flanked on the northeast by a fault-line scarp and on the southwest by ridges composed of bedded back- reef dolomite and siltstone of the Seven Rivers, Yates, and Tansill formations.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Carlsbad Caverns 7.5-Minute Quadrangle
    NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES A RESEARCH DIVISION OF NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING AND TECHNOLOGY NMBGMR Open-File Geologic Map 285 Last Modified June 2020 Correlation of Map Units Description of Map Units 104°30'0"W 104°27'30"W 104°25'0"W 104°22'30"W 490000 548000 549000 550000 500000 551000 552000 553000 510000 554000 A 555000 556000 520000 557000 558000 QUATERNARY PERMIAN Capitan Formation 32°15'0"N Py Qy 32°15'0"N Qy Py Qyc Capitan Formation—From a distance this unit exhibits a weekly Qy Py Qy Holocene Ochoan Pcp Pt Py Qyc Qy Py Holo. developed inclined layering that dips southeastward between ~15° and 000 Holocene Sedimentary Deposits Castile Formation Alluvial Alluvial Deposits 3568 Pt Qy Deposits Holocene 4 Holocene Psr Qyc Qyc 000 3568000 30°. This layering is more pronounced closer to the Delaware basin. In Qy Qy Pt Qy 0 Active channel deposits—Predominantly unconsolidated sand and Castile Formation—Composed of alternating regular laminae and thin Py 0 Qyc Pc Qy Pt 0 Qs outcrop, most exposures appear massive and structureless. A faint Qy 4 0 gravel dominated by clasts of carbonate surrounded by a silty to sandy beds of dark-colored and light- colored anhydrite. Layering is mostly 0 e Pt e Qy Psr 8 Qy 02 3 brecciated texture is visible locally where angular clasts of dolomite of n n carbonaceous matrix. Mostly devoid of vegetation though some low contorted and is rarely consistent for more than a few meters. Both 04 03 01 Qyc e 05 04 03 e Qss e e Pt c Py c terraces typically less than 1 m above the active channel contain weak stream-cut exposures and upper surface exposures show abundant all sizes are strongly cemented by different generations of carbonate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oil and Gas Resources of New Mexico SECOND EDITION
    NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MINES BULLETIN 18 STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES PLATE 1 Ship Rock, northwestern San Juan County. An igneous intrusion with radiating dikes. In the Rattle- snake pool, less than five miles away, oil and gas have accumulated in Cretaceous strata similar to those in the foreground. (Spence Air Photos.) NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MINES STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES RICHARD H. REECE President and Director BULLETIN NO. 18 The Oil and Gas Resources of New Mexico SECOND EDITION Compiled by ROBERT L. BATES Geologist, State Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO 1942 CONTENTS Page The State Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources ---------------------------------------------------- 12 Board of Regents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 Introduction, by Robert L. Bates -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 General statement ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 Purpose and scope of the report -------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 Acknowledgments -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------14 Geography and general geology, after D. E. Winchester ---------------------------------------------- 15 The Rocks ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 18 General statement, by Robert L. Bates ------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Distinctions Between Reefs and Bioherms
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1992 Distinctions Between Reefs and Bioherms Based on Studies of Fossil Algae: Mizzia, Permian Capitan Reef Complex (Guadalupe Mountains, Texas and New Mexico) and Eugonophyllum, Pennsylvanian Holder Formation (Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico). Brenda Kirkland George Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation George, Brenda Kirkland, "Distinctions Between Reefs and Bioherms Based on Studies of Fossil Algae: Mizzia, Permian Capitan Reef Complex (Guadalupe Mountains, Texas and New Mexico) and Eugonophyllum, Pennsylvanian Holder Formation (Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico)." (1992). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 5306. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/5306 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Facies, Environments of Deposition and Cyclicity of The
    THE FACIES, ENVIRONMENTS OF DEPOSITION AND CYCLICITY OF THE YATES FORMATION, NORTH WARD-ESTES FIELD, WARD COUNTY, TEXAS A Thesis by RONNIE DELANE JOHNSON Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE August 1997 Major Subject: Geology THE FACIES, ENVIRONMENTS OF DEPOSTITION AND CYCLICITY OF THE YATES FORMATION, NORTH WARD-ESTES FIELD, WARD COUNTY, TEXAS A Thesis by RONNIE DELANE JOHNSON Submitted to Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved as to style and content by James ullo Steven Dorobek (Chair of Commitee) (Member) Chi u illip Rabinowitz (Member) (Head of Department) August 1997 Major Subject: Geology ABSTRACT The Facies, Environments of Deposition and Cyclicity of the Yates Formation, North Ward-Estes Field, Ward County, Texas. (August 1997) Ronnie Delane Johnson, B.S. , Louisiana State University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. James Mazzullo The Yates Formation is part of the Artesia Group, a sequence of interbedded carbonates, clastics and evaporites that was deposited across the back-reef shelves of the Permian basin in Late Permian (Upper Guadalupian) time. The Artesia Group is the shelfal equivalent of the shelf-marginal Capitan and Goat Seep Reefs and deep-basinal Delaware Mountain Group. This study is based on the description of seven cores and twenty-two well logs from North Ward-Estes field along the western margin of the Central Basin Platform. The Yates Formation consists of sub-arkosic sandstones and siltstones and dolomitic mudstones and wackestones.
    [Show full text]