Mark 10:2-12 God's Commands and Promises Concerning Your

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mark 10:2-12 God's Commands and Promises Concerning Your Mark 10:2-12 God’s Commands and Promises Concerning Your Marriage October 14, 2012 Some Pharisees came and tested him by asking, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife?” “What did Moses command you?” he replied. They said, “Moses permitted a man to write a certificate of divorce and send her away.” “It was because your hearts were hard that Moses wrote you this law,” Jesus replied. “But at the beginning of creation God ‘made them male and female.’ ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh.’ So they are no longer two, but one. Therefore, what God has joined together, let man not separate.” When they were in the house again, the disciples asked Jesus about this. He answered, “Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her. And if she divorces her husband and marries another man, she commits adultery.” (NIV) During the summer we often drop Dish Network for a few months and save quite a bit of money. However, they continue to give you whatever the free preview channels are at a certain time. This summer one of the channels had frequent reruns of Frasier. I was reintroduced to the storyline of Niles Crane's secret attraction to Daphne Moon, the housekeeper of Niles’ brother Frasier. Over time, Daphne had a secret attraction to Niles as well. After a number of seasons of this, Niles married a plastic surgeon named Melanie, while Daphne was about to get married to a lawyer named Donny. Frasier decided to get involved by revealing to Niles and Daphne their attraction for one another. The show ended with Daphne leaving Donny at the altar and running away with Niles in his father’s Winnebago. That is, the show ends with basically two divorces. The show ends with two people destroying their marriages, breaking the lifelong promises they had made to others. The original storyline aired 12 years ago, so perhaps I have forgotten--but I certainly don't recall any societal outcry concerning this episode. And while perhaps memory has become somewhat hazy, I highly doubt there was one. I don’t know percentages--and they differ according to who you talk to--but in a nation in which a high percentage of adults have gotten a divorce, you wouldn’t have expected there to be a wailing that the show Frasier would soon cause a decline in the nation’s morals. And the fact is that the show probably didn’t cause a decline in the nation’s morals. It was probably too late for that. If the producers of Frasier had intended to be cutting-edge trend-setters, they didn’t choose their subject matter very well. Far from setting the standard for the nation’s morals, attitudes, and beliefs concerning marriage and divorce, the show simply reflected them. But what I did find interesting is that there is one area in which the writers of the show were cutting-edge, one area in which they stepped outside of the usual pattern for sitcoms. And the fact that they felt free to do so is, I think, instructive of the attitude of American society. Since the people who produce television tend to be shameless manipulators of our emotions, you would have expected that Niles and Daphne would have been married (or, in Daphne’s case, engaged to be married) to tyrannical, overemotional, uncaring, completely dislikeable people. TV writers typically do this so that we waste no energy mourning for the other parties in the broken marriages, instead spending our emotion on rejoicing at the fact that the two are finally free of their brutish (or shrewish) spouses and have finally found each other. The writers of Frasier didn’t bother with that. While Melanie and Donny both had their flaws as human beings, they were not the monstrous caricatures that we have come to expect in such situations. It appears that the show’s writers decided the American public no longer needed to have divorce justified by having the characters being treated unfairly in their current marriage. It appears that now it is no longer necessary for the characters to be involved in a marriage that “can’t work” in order for them to be justified in getting a divorce. Now the American public simply needs to suspect that those characters might come closer to “finding themselves” and “self-actualizing” in another marriage. Let’s say it. In the land of television, the mere possibility that an individual might be happier in another marriage is now good enough reason to break off the current marriage. That’s the case in the land of television, it is more and more becoming the case in the land of what we call “real life”, and it is, I fear, becoming more and more the case in the minds and the thoughts of those who call themselves Christians. Test yourself. When Daphne showed up in that Winnebago, did you find it to be a happy ending? Were you pleased that the show had ended with these two people whom destiny had been trying to bring together for years--finally together? Or, if you’re unfamiliar with Frasier, how about this–when you saw the movie Titanic, did your heart feel as though all was right with the world when Kate Winslet and Leonardo Dicaprio finally had sex? Was there just something that felt “so right that it couldn’t be wrong” when Kate Winslet cheated on her fiancee’, the one to whom she had made a solemn promise to get married, with someone she had known for all of a couple days? More to the point, how many of you have a friend that you have thought should dump their spouse because they were being “held back”, their “spirit was being restrained”, or a whole host of other phrases which are often used? In fact, have you sometimes wondered if you wouldn’t be happier in a different marriage than the one you are in? Have you even perhaps considered pursuing “outside interests” with an eye open towards the possibility of abandoning your current marriage? Have you even told yourself that something that feels so right and makes you so happy can’t possibly be wrong? Whatever your thoughts and plans are in this area, you ought to clear them first with the one who is in charge of your marriage. That’s not you. That’s not your spouse. No, the person who is in charge of your marriage is God. Let’s hear what he has to say about your marriage. We read that the Pharisees came up to test Jesus by asking him whether it was OK to get a divorce. If Jesus were to say that it was OK, I suppose that people could have responded in 2 ways. They could have immediately marched home, kicked their wife out, and told her that the prophet Jesus said it was OK. Or, perhaps the more likely of the two with this group, they would have declared him a false prophet for speaking contradictory to the words of God in Malachi: “I hate divorce.” (2:16) But at the same time, if he were to say that it was not OK to get a divorce, they could then accuse him of opposing Moses, someone very near and dear to the heart of every Israelite. For in Deuteronomy 24 Moses had indeed made provisions for a man divorcing his wife. Jesus anticipates all this and answers with a question of his own : “What did Moses command you?” Perhaps twisting the question a bit, they don’t speak about what Moses commanded. Rather, they tell what Moses permitted , saying, “Moses permitted a man to write a certificate of divorce and send her away.” Indeed Moses had, but Jesus answers tells them why Moses had done that. He says, “It was because your hearts were hard that Moses wrote you this law.” In other words, “Moses saw that in the past you had chosen to get divorces, and he knew that you were going to continue to do so in the future. Therefore, in order to keep things orderly and in order to limit the damage that could be caused by such divorces, God had Moses institute some rules and regulations by which this would be done.” Our government takes a similar approach today, offering “no-fault divorces” in which both parties agree to simply end the marriage, without needing to provide any justification for doing so. But was that ever OK in God’s eyes? Was that ever God’s plan for marriage? Not at all! Jesus goes back to the beginning of marriage, back to the Garden of Eden when God set up marriage and said, “For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh.” Jesus then goes on to say, “So they are no longer two, but one. Therefore what God has joined together, let man not separate.” Jesus is clear. It does not matter if you get divorced with the intention of marrying the “true” love of your life. If you choose to get a divorce for any reason other than the two reasons permitted in Scripture--marital unfaithfulness and desertion--you...are...sinning. Keep this in mind as you counsel friends whose marriages are struggling. Ponder this carefully if you yourself begin to even consider a divorce.
Recommended publications
  • Off Campus Students Question Safety October Is Alcohol Awareness Month
    •-" --NEWS- -SPORTS^ Sorfiestudents^questioh • The Red Foxes were. whether the food quality blanked for the second has gone up in the hew- game in a! row on Satur­ lcx>kMaristdininghall, day, falling 31-0 to Pg-3 Duquesne, pg. 16 THE CIRCLE the student newspaper of N|arist College VOLUME #53 ISSUE #2 HTTP://WWW.ACADEMIC.MARIST.EDV/C1RCLE SEPTEMBER 23, 1999 Off campus students question safety byJAIMETOMEO thorities must be published for who were mugged walking back Asst. News Editor the past three calendar years. to Marist at night: It is enough Mother always said to go ev­ During the 1998 school year to make students ask the ques­ erywhere with a buddy and look there were three reported bur­ tion, "Am 1 really safe off-cam­ both ways before crossing the glaries reported and one weap­ pus?" street to be safe. ons possession. This is a de­ It is a question all students Under the federal law entitled cline from the two proceeding should take into consideration "Student Right to Know and school years. • before walking past the new Campus Security Act", statis­ Yet students still hear repeated black metal fence. Unfortunately tics regarding certain crimes re­ stories of the student who was for many, becoming a statistic of ported to campus security au­ dragged by a cab and of people ...please see CRIME, pg. 4 Circle photo/Megan Williams Multiple crimes have occured near the Palace Diner recently. Parents to take jawexthe cahipus . arpund;-carnpus,~and .various r byKATEREILLY sporting events, there is also the '"; ' Staff Writer opportunity for parents and The sight of students clean­ students to take a boat cruise ing^ their rooms.for the past on the Hudson River.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Vue Chicago
    January 2006 Re-Vue Chicago Happy New Year!! Pre-Vues: Guitar geek festival Ponderosa Stomp Re-Vues: DVD — Nightcourt USA CDs— Spo-Dee-O-Dee "The Many Sides Of…" The Round Up Boys “Good Lookin' Daddy" Saying Goodbye Closings: Passings: Berghoff Candy Barr Tiny Lounge James Austin Marshall Fields Trader vics City news James Dean Gallery As always News, reviews, Event Notices, Calendar And morE Inside this issue Re-Vue Another new year! The Re-Vue staff were primed and ready at the end of 2005 to start the fourth year for Re-Vue… then the Holidays struck and some of us did a little too much celebrating! So, the Re-Vue gang are EASING our way into 2006 with a no-frills issue. This month our most dedicated writers went forth into the farthest reaches of the city to bring you a look at what will be missing in Chicago this year. So many great places shuttered their doors in December and we wanted to do a little something to mourn their passing. Time-honored favorites like Marshall Fields, the fabulous Berghoff Restaurant (the oldest restaurant in the city will close its doors in February!!), and Trader Vics. We also felt that the time was right to take a woeful look back over all the celebrities that we lost in the last year. Col. Dan Sorenson started his own version of (pardon the expression) “death watch 2005” early last year. He complied a very comprehensive list of celebrities, has-beens, and the almost never-weres that passed on to the great beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Tv Land Signs Wendy Malick and Jane Leeves to Star In
    PRODUCTION TO BEGIN MAY 10 ON TV LAND’S FIRST ORIGINAL SITCOM “HOT IN CLEVELAND” STARRING VALERIE BERTINELLI, JANE LEEVES, WENDIE MALICK AND BETTY WHITE Series Premieres on TV Land on June 16 New York, NY, May 6, 2010 – TV Land announced today that production on the network’s first original sitcom, “Hot in Cleveland” starring Valerie Bertinelli, Jane Leeves, Wendie Malick and Betty White will begin on Monday, May 10. The 10 episode series premieres June 16 at 10pm on TV Land. The sitcom is TV Land’s first foray into scripted comedy series and is a TV Land PRIME presentation. “Hot in Cleveland” is executive produced by Emmy® Award-winner Sean Hayes and Todd Milliner of Hazy Mills Productions and is helmed by Emmy® Award-winning Suzanne Martin (“Frasier,” “Ellen”) serving as executive producer, show runner and writer. “Hot In Cleveland” revolves around three fabulous best friends from LA – novelist Melanie Moretti (Bertinelli), eye-brow archer to the stars Joy Scroggs (Leeves) and former soap star Victoria Chase (Malick) – who find their lives changed forever when their plane, headed for Paris, makes an unexpected landing. When the friends discover that they are hot in Cleveland, they decide to stay. Starting over, they rent a house that happens to come with a very feisty caretaker (White). About the “Hot in Cleveland” cast: Popular actress Valerie Bertinelli is best-remembered for her role as “Barbara Jean Cooper” on the beloved Norman Lear sitcom “One Day At A Time.” She also starred in “Touched By An Angel” for the show’s final two seasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Pierce, David Hyde (B
    Pierce, David Hyde (b. 1959) by Linda Rapp Encyclopedia Copyright © 2015, glbtq, Inc. Entry Copyright © 2007 glbtq, Inc. Reprinted from http://www.glbtq.com David Hyde Pierce at the Emmy Awards in 1994. Award-winning stage and screen actor David Hyde Pierce is best known for his Photo by Alan Light. portrayal of the effete and sometimes pompous but always lovable Dr. Niles Crane on the long-running hit comedy television series Frasier. Closeted for decades, Pierce came out in 2007 and publicly acknowledged his partner, Brian Hargrove, in his acceptance speech at the Tony Awards ceremony. David Hyde Pierce comes from a middle-class family. His father, George Pierce, was an insurance agent in Saratoga Springs, New York, and his mother, Laura Pierce, was a homemaker. David, the youngest of their four children, was born April 3, 1959. Pierce showed a flair for acting early on, writing little plays that he put on with friends from school. On the one hand, he favored dramatic death scenes--succumbing both as Julius Caesar and John Dillinger--but he also had an instinct for comedy, realizing as a second-grader, he recalled, that "a joke was funnier if I didn't laugh. I've been deadpan ever since." Pierce is also a talented musician and aspired to a career as a concert pianist. When, as a youngster, he announced this ambition to his parents, they showed him an encyclopedia entry about Albert Schweitzer, an accomplished musician as well as a Nobel Peace laureate, in order to encourage him not to "narrow his focus" too soon.
    [Show full text]
  • Discourses of Care: Media, Medicine and Society University of Glasgow, 5 Th – 7Th September 2016 Care and Televisual Spectator
    Accepted for publication in Discourses of Care: Care in Media, Medicine and Society, Bloomsbury, 2020 Discourses of Care: Media, Medicine and Society University of Glasgow, 5th – 7th September 2016 Care and Televisual Spectatorship As the abstract to my paper indicates, I wish to make a contribution to this conference by reflecting on the significance of televisual viewing as a form of care as lived through by myself and my late wife, Antonella, after she became ill with a rare, highly aggressive and ultimately terminal form of endometrial cancer (papillary serous carcinoma). As such this paper will in many ways be highly personal – how could it not be given that today, the 6th of September, would have been our 19th wedding anniversary – but I hope that in exploring our joint experience of her illness there may be more general observations about the relationship between care and various forms of media that might prove valuable.1 I’m not a TV specialist, so I am very aware that there will be all sorts of deficiencies in terms of history and theory in this paper; however, I felt that a personal intervention, inflected with my broader background in Film and Critical Theory might prove productive; I hope that this might be the case here today! So, as I have just suggested this paper is seeking to explore the relationship between care, illness and (televisual) spectatorship from a primarily autobiographical perspective and it is with the autobiographical that I wish to begin, taking my cue from Amy Holdsworth’s compelling Screen article ‘Televisual Memory’ (2010), which resonated, as I read it, with many aspects of my own work on Afterwardsness in film, and which has proved instructive in my reflections on television viewing, memory, mourning but also, importantly, care.
    [Show full text]
  • Representing British Working Class at the Turn of the New Millennium: a Study of the Royle Family
    Representing British Working Class at the Turn of the New Millennium: A Study of The Royle Family University of Tampere Department of English Pro Gradu Thesis Autumn 2005 Henna Ala-Kutsi 1 Tampereen yliopisto Englantilainen filologia Kieli- ja käännöstieteiden laitos Henna Ala-Kutsi: ”Representing British Working Class at the Turn of the New Millennium: A Study of The Royle Family” Pro Gradu –tutkielma, 102 sivua. Elokuu 2005 ______________________________________________________________________ Tässä Pro Gradu –tutkielmassani tutkin työväenluokan representaatioita brittiläisessä komediasarjassa The Royle Family (suom. Sohvanvaltaajat, 1998–2000), joka nimensä mukaisesti kertoo manchesterilaisesta Roylen perheestä. Sarjan suomenkielinen nimi juontunee siitä, että Roylen perhe todellakin suurimmaksi osaksi istuu olohuoneensa sohvalla, kommentoiden televisio-ohjelmien lomassa sekä itse ohjelmia että elämänmenoa. Aluksi selvitän mitä tarkoitan käsitteillä työväenluokka sekä representaatio. Sen jälkeen tarkastelen yleisesti representaatioita, joita työväenluokasta on esitetty. Esimerkkini ovat lähinnä television komediasarjoista, kuuluuhan The Royle Familykin samaan genreen. Työväenluokka on usein esitetty hyvin negatiivisten kuvien kautta: heidät on representoitu mm. lihavina, likaisina, tyylittöminä, räävittöminä, tyhminä, vanhanaikaisina sekä passiivisina. Kolmannessa luvussa tarkastelen tilannekomedioiden historiaa Britanniassa. Keskityn erityisesti komediasarjoihin joissa on työväenluokkaisia hahmoja selvittääkseni kontekstin, johon
    [Show full text]
  • Frasier Crane Niles Crane Daphne Moon Cam Winston Sherry
    HOST HOST HOST Frasier Crane Niles Crane Daphne Moon Once per turn, Frasier may Niles begins the game with an Once during the game, discard two cards from his extra card in his hand. Daphne may choose an hand to draw one card from opponent and look at their the main deck. hand. HOST FAVOR FAVOR Cam Winston Sherry Champagne Whenever Cam completes a Take up to two guests from the Take the top Guest from the Tangent, he gets an extra Lobby, then discard Sherry. Guest Deck. Shuffle any Guest from the Guest deck. Tangents revealed back into the deck, then discard Champagne. FAVOR FAVOR FAVOR Château Pétrus Russian Caviar The Minister’s Cat Take a Fancy character from the Take a Villain from the Lobby Choose a Guest. That Guest Lobby or another party, then or another party, then cannot leave your party as discard Château Pétrus. discard Russian Caviar. long as The Minister’s Cat is in play. FAVOR FAVOR FAVOR Christmas Carols Costume Contest Passionate Tango Turn all your guests upside down. You may Guests won’t leave your party look at them but other players may not. You Choose a Guest at your party. until your next turn. Then may rearrange them as often as you like. If That guest will remain at your an opponent has a card that would affect one Christmas Carols is discarded. of your guests, the guest they choose is party for the rest of the game, revealed, but is only affected if the card would affect them normally. Guests turn face even if Passionate Tango is -up again if Costume Contest is discarded.
    [Show full text]
  • GPDF149-BT-WAF.Pdf
    1 2 “Our bones only ache while the flesh is on them. Stretch it thin as the temple flesh of an ailing woman and still it serves to ache the bone and to move the bone about; and in like manner the night is a skin pulled over the head of day that the day may be in a torment. We will find no comfort until the night melts away; until the fury of the night rots out its fire.” - Djuna Barnes, Nightwood 3 Table of Contents: DRAMATIS PERSONAE - 6 Seductive Intellect - 7 The Devil w/o a Clause - 16 Cultural Acceptance - 18 Playing Squash in 20 Minutes - 21 Someone So Young - 22 "I Prefer Not To." - 23 Nothing Changes - 26 Frasier As Voyeur - 27 Frasier Is An Asshole - 28 Goodnight, Seattle - 29 Rebound (Part I) - 30 Narrative Beyond Roz - 31 Late Night w/Frasier - 32 "You look pale Bartleby!" - 33 How To Not Look Like Frasier - 34 Never Be Anti-Frasier/Never Be Anti-Cheers - 35 4 Caught In The Act - 36 How Much To Renew - 37 Since I Finally Figured Out How To Plug It In - 38 It Was A Dark & Stormy Day - 39 Madrigal Inconsequence - 40 Antique Scout - 41 5 DRAMATIS PERSONAE: Frasier Crane — A respected doctor in Seattle, WA who has his own psychiatry radio show. Niles Crane — Excitable younger brother of Frasier, A.K.A: "Nervous Little Niles". Marty Crane — Father of the Crane family, who comes to live in Frasier's apartment. Daphne Moon — Hired servant of the household who becomes Niles' wife in Season 10.
    [Show full text]
  • [7.1] Momma Mia
    1 of 16 [7.1] Momma Mia Momma Mia Written by Rob Hanning Directed by Kelsey Grammer ===================================================================== Production Code: 7.1. Episode Number In Production Order: 147. Original Airdate on NBC: 23rd September 1998 Original Airdare on Channel 4: 7th January 2000 Episode filmed on 31st August 1999 Synopsis written on 23rd September 1999 Transcript written on 10th January 2000 Transcript Revised First on 2nd August 2000 Transcript Revised Second on 26th May 2001 Cast List [ in order of appearance ] FRASIER CRANE..........................................KELSEY GRAMMER ROZ DOYLE.................................................PERI GILPIN FRANCESCA..............................................GEORGIA EMELIN MIA PRESTON/HESTER CRANE..................................RITA WILSON JESSICA..............................................DELAINA MITCHELL MARTIN CRANE.............................................JOHN MAHONEY DAPHNE MOON...............................................JANE LEEVES NILES CRANE.........................................DAVID HYDE PIERCE YOUNG NILES.................................................SEAN CAST YOUNG FRASIER........................................DUSTIN TRAGETHON Transcript {nick hartley} Skyline: Above the Seattle skyline flies a plane trailing behind it a banner reading "KACL." Act One. Scene One - Café Nervosa. Roz and Frasier are seated by the window. Frasier is waiting for his blind date. Frasier: This is exactly why I hate fix-ups, she's not coming. Roz: Just give her a few more minutes. Come on, tell me about the cabin. Frasier: Oh, all right. Well, Mom and Dad used to take us up there when we were kids. Niles and I thought it might be a nice birthday gift for Dad if we took him up there again. [ then ] Oh, this is ridiculous! I'm being stood up on a blind date - 2 of 16 I'm pathetic. Roz: You are so insecure. God! Where does that come from? Jessica will be here.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections of Legal Culture in Television Comedy: Social Critique And
    Reflections of legal culture in television comedy: Social critique and ANGOR UNIVERSITY Schadenfreude in the US series Frasier“ Machura, Stefan; Litvinova, Olga International Journal of the Semiotics of Law DOI: 10.1007/s11196-020-09749-y PRIFYSGOL BANGOR / B Published: 01/02/2021 Peer reviewed version Cyswllt i'r cyhoeddiad / Link to publication Dyfyniad o'r fersiwn a gyhoeddwyd / Citation for published version (APA): Machura, S., & Litvinova, O. (2021). Reflections of legal culture in television comedy: Social critique and Schadenfreude in the US series Frasier“. International Journal of the Semiotics of Law, 34(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09749-y Hawliau Cyffredinol / General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. 02. Oct. 2021 Professor Stefan Machura, Dr Olga Litvinova Reflections of legal culture in television comedy: Social critique and Schadenfreude in the US series ‟Frasier“ Bangor University, School of History, Philosophy and Social Sciences, Gwynedd LL57 2DG, United Kingdom Contact: [email protected], 0044-1248-382214 ORCID Stefan Machura: 0000-0001-7619-2529 Abstract Traces of law can be found in all aspects of life, law is ubiquitous.
    [Show full text]
  • Television Performances by Pregnant Actresses
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-23-2018 Labor and Delivery: Television Performances By Pregnant Actresses From 1948-2016 Evleen Michelle Nasir Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Other Film and Media Studies Commons, Television Commons, Theatre and Performance Studies Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Nasir, Evleen Michelle, "Labor and Delivery: Television Performances By Pregnant Actresses From 1948-2016" (2018). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 4598. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/4598 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. LABOR AND DELIVERY: TELEVISION PERFORMANCES BY PREGNANT ACTRESSES FROM 1948-2016 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The School of Theatre by Evleen Michelle Nasir B.A., Texas A&M University M.A., Texas A&M University August 2018 to my parents for their love and support, to Kirsten for convincing me & to Kevin for everything ii Acknowledgements This project came out of a research trip in 2011. While working in the Ronald L. Davis Oral History Collection as a research assistant for my then mentor and now friend Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Av-Kääntämisen Olennaisuudet Ja Olemattomuudet – Tiivistäminen Komediasarja Frasierin Tekstityksissä
    Av-kääntämisen olennaisuudet ja olemattomuudet – tiivistäminen komediasarja Frasierin tekstityksissä Sinikka Jauhiainen Tampereen yliopisto Kieli- ja käännöstieteiden laitos Käännöstiede (englanti) Pro gradu -tutkielma Toukokuu 2009 Tampereen yliopisto Käännöstiede (englanti) Kieli- ja käännöstieteiden laitos JAUHIAINEN, SINIKKA: Av-kääntämisen olennaisuudet ja olemattomuudet – tiivistäminen komediasarja Frasierin tekstityksissä Pro gradu -tutkielma, 83 sivua + englanninkielinen tiivistelmä 7 sivua Kevät 2009 Tässä tutkimuksessa käsittelin tiivistämistä tekstityksissä. Tiivistämistä tapahtuu tekstittämi- sessä aina, sillä kaikkea alkuperäisen ohjelman puhetta ei voida kääntää tekstityksiin tilan ja ajan asettamien rajoitusten vuoksi. Minua kiinnostikin pohtia, mitkä lähtökielen piirteet ovat kääntäjän kannalta olennaisimpia ja mitä piirteitä kääntäjä taas voi jättää tekstityksistä pois. Lähtöhypoteesina tutkimuksessa oli, että aineistoni tekstityksissä tapahtuu tiivistämistä pal- jon, minkä seurauksena tapahtuisi myös sisällöllistä menetystä ja tekstityksien kieli olisi huomattavasti köyhempi kuin lähtöteoksen kieli. Oletin myös, että lähtöteoksen sisältämä huumori olisi lieventynyt tai jopa hävinnyt tekstityksistä kokonaan. Aineistona tutkimuksessa käytin yhdysvaltalaista komediasarjaa Frasier, josta analysoin kol- mea jaksoa. Frasierista tekee kiehtovan tutkimusmateriaalin se, että siinä esiintyy paljon no- peatempoista puhetta, ja lisäksi sarjan huumori on useimmiten moniulotteista ja kulttuu- risidonnaista. Tutkimusmetodini oli empiirinen
    [Show full text]