City of Cockburn District Traffic Study

2016 AND 2031 TRAFFIC FORECASTS

Prepared for CITY OF COCKBURN

Prepared by Uloth and Associates 24 May 2006 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Uloth and Associates was appointed by City of Cockburn to develop a regional and district level traffic model that will assist in determining the road infrastructure requirements to reflect the growth and needs within the City.

The specific study area is defined as the City of Cockburn municipal boundary. However, the overall model also includes the developing urban areas in Forrestdale and Mandogalup, the redevelopment of Hope Valley/Wattleup and the existing areas to the north.

Existing weekday traffic flows for the overall area are documented in Figures 2 and 3, showing that the most heavily trafficked roads within the City of Cockburn (apart from Kwinana Freeway) are currently Armadale Road and North Lake Road.

Traffic forecasts have then been prepared for both 2016 and 2031, both with and without the construction of Roe Highway Stage 8. The 2016 model has also been run both with and without the proposed North Lake Road bridge over Kwinana Freeway.

The future traffic forecasts, including differences between the various scenarios, are shown in Figure 5 to Figure 12, while Tables 4, 5 and 6 provide summaries of existing and future traffic flows on significant roads together with an indication of required infrastructure improvements and possible timing.

i TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Study Area and Traffic Zones 1 1.2 Study Objectives 1

2. EXISTING WEEKDAY TRAFFIC 2

3. FUTURE LAND USE DATA 3

4. DEVELOPMENT OF TRAFFIC MODEL 6 4.1 Sub-Area Data from Main Roads WA 6 4.2 Trip Generation and Trip Purposes 7 4.3 Overall ‘Self-Sufficiency’ 7 4.4 Distribution of External Trips to and from Overall Study Area 7 4.5 Future Road Networks 9

5. FUTURE TRAFFIC FORECASTS 10 5.1 North Lake Road Bridge in 2016 10 5.2 Roe Highway Stage 8 11 5.3 Summary of Existing and Future Traffic Flows and Timing of Required Improvements 12

TECHNICAL APPENDIX A-1

A.1 DETAILED LAND USE DATA A-2

ii LIST OF TABLES

Page

1. Comparison of 2016 Modelled Land Use Data versus Main Roads WA Data 4 for Overall Study Area

2. Comparisons of 2031 Modelled Land Use Data versus Main Roads WA Data 5 for Overall Study Area

3. Distribution of External Trips to and from Overall Study Area 8

4. Existing and Future Traffic Flows and Required Improvements (Without Roe Hwy Stage 8) 13 City of Cockburn – East/West Roads

5. Existing and Future Traffic Flows and Required Improvements (Without Roe Hwy Stage 8) 15 City of Cockburn – North/South Roads, West of Kwinana Freeway

6. Existing and Future Traffic Flows and Required Improvements (Without Roe Hwy Stage 8) 17 City of Cockburn – North/South Roads, East of Kwinana Freeway

TECHNICAL APPENDIX

A.1 2016 Land Use Data within City of Cockburn A-3

A.2 2031 Land Use Data within City of Cockburn A-8

iii LIST OF FIGURES

Follows Page

1. Overall Study Area and Future Traffic Zones – City of Cockburn District Traffic Study 1

2. Existing Weekday Traffic Flows 2 Inner Area - North of Beeliar Drive and West of Kwinana Freeway

3. Existing Weekday Traffic Flows – Outer Areas 2

4. Defined Sub-Area for Data from Main Roads WA – City of Cockburn Traffic Study 6

5. 2016 Weekday Traffic Flows 10 Without Roe Highway Stage 8 and Without North Lake Road Bridge

6. 2016 Weekday Traffic Flows 10 Without Roe Highway Stage 8 and With North Lake Road Bridge

7. 2016 Weekday Traffic Differences – With North Lake Road Bridge 10

8. 2016 Weekday Traffic Flows 11 With Roe Highway Stage 8 and Without North Lake Road Bridge

9. 2016 Weekday Traffic Differences – With Roe Highway Stage 8 11

10. 2031 Weekday Traffic Flows – Without Roe Highway Stage 8 11

11. 2031 Weekday Traffic Flows – With Roe Highway Stage 8 11

12. 2031 Weekday Traffic Differences – With Roe Highway Stage 8 11

iv 1. INTRODUCTION

As part of a review of its Strategic Plan, City of Cockburn is seeking to ensure that infrastructure provision reflects the growth and needs within the City. Since the road network is an essential part of these infrastructure requirements, Uloth and Associates has been appointed to develop a regional and district level traffic model that will assist in determining the required road characteristics and road reserves, as well as likely timing for inclusion within the road works programme and budget.

1.1 STUDY AREA AND TRAFFIC ZONES

The specific study area is defined as the City of Cockburn municipal boundary. However, it is also necessary to take into account the developing urban areas in Forrestdale and Mandogalup, the redevelopment of Hope Valley/Wattleup, and the existing urban areas to the north.

The Overall Study Area has therefore been identified as an area bounded generally by South Street in the north, Nicholson Road in the east and Anketell Road in the south, as reflected in the Future Traffic Zones plan shown in Figure 1.

It is important to note that the initial 3-digit traffic zone numbers shown in Figure 1 identify the Main Roads WA Traffic Zones as utilised within its regional traffic model. However, the additional hyphenated numbers show how some Main Road WA Traffic Zones were subdivided for the purposes of this study.

1.2 STUDY OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study are as follows: • Identify existing traffic volumes within the overall study area. • Develop a regional and district level traffic model for the Overall Study Area, for both 2016 and 2031. • Identify 2016 and 2031 traffic volumes for specified roads, both with and without Roe Highway Stage 8. • Identify alternative 2016 traffic flows, including the planned North Lake Road bridge over Kwinana Freeway • Identify deficiencies in the road network and provide advice on likely timing for road network improvements.

A separate report titled ‘City of Cockburn Local Traffic Study’ has also been prepared, to address various local traffic issues within Jandakot and Success.

2. EXISTING WEEKDAY TRAFFIC

Existing weekday traffic flows, as obtained from Main Roads WA and City of Cockburn, are shown in Figures 2 and 3.

Figure 2 shows existing traffic flows (prior to the opening of Roe Highway Stage 7) for an Inner Area to the north of Beeliar Drive and west of Kwinana Freeway, while Figure 3 shows traffic flows within the remaining Outer Areas.

It can be seen in Figure 2 that apart from Kwinana Freeway, the most heaviest trafficked road within the City of Cockburn is Armadale Road east of Kwinana Freeway, with 31,270 vehicles per day recorded in April 2003.

This is followed by North Lake Road, between Farrington Road and Forrest Road, which carried 29,510 vehicles per day in October 2004.

3. FUTURE LAND USE DATA

Land use data for the overall study area was initially obtained from Main Roads WA for 2006, 2016, 2021 and 2031.

City of Cockburn then reviewed this data and developed revised land use scenarios for the City of Cockburn for 2016 and 2031, based on a detailed analysis of the existing situation, current trends, and anticipated future growth.

Additional data was then also obtained from City of Armadale (for the Forrestdale development), and from Town of Kwinana (for the Mandogalup and Wandi developments) and this data was then integrated with the Main Roads WA data for the Outer Areas.

The detailed City of Cockburn land use data for 2016 and 2031 is shown in Tables A.1 and A.2 in the Technical Appendix. A summary of the overall land use data, together with a comparison against the initial data provided by Main Roads WA is shown in Tables 1 and 2.

Of particular interest, it should be noted that a significant level of development has been assumed to occur within Jandakot Airport, which is represented in Tables A.1 and A.2 as Zone 782-1. It can be seen that a total of 150,000 square metres of industrial floor space with 1,500 employees has been included for 2016, increasing to 400,000 square metres with 4,000 employees by 2031.

It should also be noted that the residential development assumed with the Town of Kwinana is consistent with the conservative lot yields identified as part of the Eastern Residential District Structure Plan currently being prepared by Town of Kwinana. It can be seen in Tables 1 and 2 that a total of 980 dwellings has been modelled for 2016, increasing to 3,917 dwellings in 2031.

However, it is important to note that since the traffic model only extends to Anketell Road, traffic flows south of Anketell Road are only based on data included within the Main Roads WA traffic model (which may be significantly lower than the current data within the District Structure Plan).

3 TABLE 1 COMPARISON OF 2016 MODELLED LAND USE DATA VERSUS MAIN ROADS WA DATA FOR OVERALL STUDY AREA

MODELLED LAND USE DATA MRWA LAND USE DATA Residential Employment Residential Employment AREA Pop. Dwell. Retail Non Retail Total Pop. Dwell. Retail Non Retail Total

Inner Area

• City of Cockburn 1) 105,156 40,772 5,190 30,161 35,351 95,127 37,777 5,131 18,615 23,745

Outer Areas

• City of Fremantle (part) 12,518 5,203 1,321 3,141 4,462 12,518 5,203 1,321 3,141 4,462

• City of Melville (part) 15,468 5,307 341 3,882 4,223 15,468 5,307 351 3,052 3,403

• City of Canning/Gosnells (part) 11,187 3,709 829 613 1,442 11,187 3,709 3,110 613 3,723

• City of Armadale (part) 9,757 3,770 284 240 524 3,102 1,135 83 212 296

• Town of Kwinana (part) 2,777 980 240 3,416 3,656 1,929 789 120 3,365 3,485

• Total Outer Areas 51,707 18,969 3,015 11,292 14,307 44,204 16,143 4,985 10,383 15,369

Grand Total 156,863 59,741 8,205 41,453 49,658 139,331 53,920 10,116 28,998 39,114

Notes: 1) Detailed land use data within City of Cockburn is shown in Table A.1 in the Technical Appendix.

Source: Compiled by Uloth and Associates from data provided by Main Roads WA, City of Cockburn, City of Armadale and Town of Kwinana.

4 TABLE 2 COMPARISON OF 2031 MODELLED LAND USE DATA VERSUS MAIN ROADS WA DATA FOR OVERALL STUDY AREA

MODELLED LAND USE DATA MRWA LAND USE DATA Residential Employment Residential Employment AREA Pop. Dwell. Retail Non Retail Total Pop. Dwell. Retail Non Retail Total

Inner Area

• City of Cockburn 1) 110,133 46,318 6,032 46,911 52,943 97,731 41,826 6,545 21,098 27,834

Outer Areas

• City of Fremantle (part) 13,375 5,482 1,583 3,512 5,095 13,375 5,482 1,583 3,512 5,095

• City of Melville (part) 17,096 6,322 402 4,503 4,905 17,096 6,322 412 3,569 3,981

• City of Canning/Gosnells (part) 10,735 4,073 857 624 1,481 10,735 4,073 3,603 624 4,227

• City of Armadale (part) 13,298 5,311 291 297 588 5,187 2,069 156 317 473

• Town of Kwinana (part) 9,709 3,917 678 4,079 4,757 3,010 1,189 139 3,992 4,131

• Total Outer Areas 64,213 25,105 3,811 13,015 16,826 49,403 19,135 5,893 12,014 17,907

Grand Total 174,346 71,423 9,843 59,926 69,769 147,134 60,961 12,438 33,112 45,741

Notes: 1) Detailed land use data within City of Cockburn is shown in Table A.2 in the Technical Appendix.

Source: Compiled by Uloth and Associates from data provided by Main Roads WA, City of Cockburn, City of Armadale and Town of Kwinana.

5 4. DEVELOPMENT OF TRAFFIC MODEL

The development of the overall traffic model is described in this section, together with the various assumptions made.

4.1 SUB-AREA DATA FROM MAIN ROADS WA

In order to ensure that the traffic model for City of Cockburn is accurately represented within the broader context of the metropolitan area, it is necessary to take into account the trips travelling both to and from the overall study area, as well as those trips travelling through the study area.

Data referred as a ‘Sub-Area Matrix’ was therefore obtained from the Main Roads WA regional traffic model for both 2016 and 2031. The ‘Sub-Area Matrix’ identifies all trips travelling to, from, through and within a specified ‘Sub-Area’ of the overall regional traffic model.

The ‘Sub-Area’ defined for this study is shown in Figure 4, and coincides with the overall study area shown in Figure 1.

The sub-area matrices were initially used to verify the overall ‘self-sufficiency’ calculations as discussed below in Section 4.3. They were also used to identify the distribution of external trips to and from the overall study area, as discussed in Section 4.4.

External traffic travelling through the overall study area was also identified, and this data was converted to PM peak hour trips on the basis of existing traffic patterns on major roads within the study area.

However, it is important to note that adjustments were made to reduce the external traffic travelling through the study area, on the basis that increased trip attractions within the study area would attract more of that through traffic to stop within the study area, rather than continue to travel through the study area to other attractions/destinations within the remainder of the metropolitan area.

6 2016 Network Plot South West Corridor Perth Metropolitan Network 1 649 Main Roads Western Australia 639 Transport Modelling Section 323 640 802

333 654 K E 647 646 N T

T 803 641 804 644 807 334 655 645

332 D MANNING R

806

656 336 335 657 812 680 642 643 805 681

794 799 674 658 682 675 696 796 800 695

683 797 677 692 659 686 795

801 676 792 678 684 660 693 791 687 694 679 714 790 715 798

697 713

688 661 A 698 708 671 R

E 793 721 685 670 700 709 717 722 L

701710 A 716 723 V

E 702 712 711718 669 705 704 725 706

703 707 719 662 720 724 726 789 788 673 785 699 689 672

E 786

730 E 787 668 729 727 728 690 822 691 667 664 663 665 731 S H R 732 E E V 783 E R D A 824 M 736 H B E 765 R 769 A D 766 R B S K I T N R 735 764 E C N R IA R O A D 770 H M 666 T MR R O R D L D IE D R R R E D 733 S A R F F ORRE ST RD 825 738 737 768 767 PHOENIX RD 771 784

D R R 739 E 827 740 S F A U R R F L R 760 A N 761 F 781 A O C R O D U R R T D 772 782 R D OCEAN RD

741 A C D O R 742 U N R O T T R R D D R 763 A T W H IG R W 762 CU 759 773 TL ER RD 734 754 D R R 780 E J 891 S AND A D 744 RA KO R 743 F T T RD H 755 774 IG R W K E A N D E R RD R MAYO R D

M O A S S O L

N O

R H

T 893 D C

756 892 N 758 D 757

A MYALL PL

746 E 745 D

776 N 775 O

T H S

A L

E Y

Y O E N T L H D S

O C N E I A R

R N

R S BARTRAM RD

O 752 D L

R R O

U D

S O S 751

RD 747 E R L L

A L O

R D M D 753 N

D M LMES R I HO A

L E

R SWAMP RD

779

R GIBBS RD GIBBS RD D GIBBS RD GIBBS RD

I LL WAY C QUI H

P P

P L

O H

S M R

L I

I A L

M L

R N

I Y

E S I

S R P

E R A S 749 778

D A

N R

748 D D E R D

OXLEY RD R P 750

P P RD GAEBLER D EY RD H GAEBLER RD OXL O

E O OXLEY RD

L Y 777 N

L R

A S

E N

A B O

V A

E RF S

N E

RD WATTLEUP RD E

RD ROWLEY RD ROWLEY RD 939 ROWLEY RD ROWLEY RD

SAYER RD A

BLAIR RD

942 L

941 BODEMAN RD C

T 938 O

937 N

N 940

P R LIONEL ST S O

D N 958 R Y D 943 P L RD R AE

A H E B D L

R T HOM R A 1146 O S RD D

B 944

R 1145 O D ETELL RD ANK L D

S R O S A N

ANKETELL RD

M R

D T O

U H T

946 R

A NG 896

N 945

D ABERNETHY RD ABERNETHY

959 RD

947 953 ORTON RD ORTON RD ORTON RD ORTON RD ORTON RD

949 A Centroid Connector

NDG

RE 1 Lane Each Direction

BE RD ACH 2 Lanes Each Direction ST 954 948 955 Wed 08 Jun 2005 TRIPS Project: TRIPCX00.PRJ 3 Lanes Each Direction

T:\ZONE1160\Y2016\ASSYR\Y2005\BASENETS\TRROA00C.NET CA

T:\ZONE1160\Y2016\ASSYR\Y2005\VIPER\SWCorridor_Network.VPR S 4 Lanes Each Direction MRWA Updated Base Network - Version Apr05 MRWA Transport Modelling Data as supplied to approved clients is confidential and is not to be made available to unauthorised persons or organisations . Licensed to Main Roads - Western Australia 4.2 TRIP GENERATION AND TRIP PURPOSES

By drawing on work previously carried out for the 2002 Cockburn Central Regional Centre Structure Plan traffic modelling (produced in conjunction with ERM), together with the latest available trip generation research, a series of PM peak hour trip generation rates have been adopted, including the following:

• Residential Dwellings 0.6 trips per dwelling (2031), and 0.7 trips per dwelling (2016).

• Regional and District Shopping Centres 4.5 trips to 8.5 trips per 100 square metres (depending on total floorspace)

• Neighbourhood and Local Shopping Centres 9.4 trips to 15.3 trips per 100 square metres (depending on total floorspace)

• Industrial Areas 0.6 trips to 1.2 trips per 100 square metres (depending on type of industry)

• Other Commercial 2.1 trips to 4.5 trips per 100 square metres (depending on type of development)

Trip productions at residential dwellings are broken down by trip purpose, as follows:

• Work Trips 43.4 percent

• Shopping Trips 34.9 percent

• Other Trips 21.7 percent

Work trips at the various attractions are calculated at 0.31 work trips per employee, while 30 percent of total trip attractions are classified as Non Home Based trips, and remaining trips are allocated as Shopping trips or Other trips as appropriate.

4.3 OVERALL ‘SELF-SUFFICIENCY’

An analysis of the 1996 Census Work Trip origin and destination matrix shows that approximately 26 percent of all trips originating within our overall study area also have their destination within the overall study area. However, it is expected that this figure will increase in the future, since a significantly increased number of work opportunities will be available within the study area.

It is therefore assumed that 30 percent (in 2016) and 35 percent (in 2031) of work trip productions generated within the study area will also have a destination within the study area, leaving 70 percent and 65 percent, respectively, travelling to and from an external destination. It is also assumed that approximately 90 percent of Shopping trips will remain within the overall study area, together with 90 percent of Other trips and 35 percent of Non Home Based trips.

The effect of these assumptions is that approximately 57 percent of all trip ends generated within the overall study area will remain within the study area. By comparison, the Main Roads WA sub-area matrices shows an overall ‘self-sufficiency’ of approximately 51 percent.

4.4 DISTRIBUTION OF EXTERNAL TRIPS TO AND FROM OVERALL STUDY AREA

The distribution of external trips travelling to and from the overall study area have been allocated on the basis of the total traffic flows at each of the external locations identified by the Main Roads WA sub-area. The percentage distribution at each external location is as shown in Table 3.

7 TABLE 3 DISTRIBUTION OF EXTERNAL TRIPS TO AND FROM OVERALL STUDY AREA

PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION EXTERNAL LOCATION 2016 2031

Northern Screenline: - Douro Rd, west of Hampton Rd 2.24 1.91 - Hampton Rd/Lefroy Rd 3.99 3.14 - South St/Wood St 3.47 3.37 - Carrington St, nth of South St 4.91 3.47 - Stock Rd, nth of South St 5.87 8.48 - North Lake Rd, nth of South St 2.98 2.31 - Gilbertson Rd & Prescott Dve nth of South St 2.27 1.95 - Murdoch Dve, nth of South St 2.89 2.41 - Kwinana Fwy, nth of South St 15.74 15.89

- Total Northern Screenline 44.36 42.93

North-Eastern Screenline: - Benningfield Rd, nth of South St 1.66 1.40 - Karel Ave, nth of South St 3.61 2.92 - Pinetree Gully Rd, nth of South St 3.02 2.51 - Vahland Ave, nth of South St 2.12 1.96 - Roe Hwy, nth of South St 8.29 8.57 - Bannister Rd, nth of South St 2.60 2.54 - Nicholson Rd, sth of Amherst Rd 3.67 3.22 - Ranford Rd, east of Nicholson Rd 4.88 4.64 - Warton Rd, nth of Nicholson Rd 1.12 0.94

- Total Nth-Eastern Screenline 30.97 28.70

South-Eastern Screenline: - Nicholson Rd, east of Warton Rd 1.33 1.75 - Armadale Rd, east of Warton Rd 3.72 3.99 - Rowley Rd, east of Liddlelow Rd 0.38 0.97 - Anketell Rd, east of Lyon Rd 0.07 0.06

- Total South Eastern Screenline 5.50 6.77

Southern Screenline: - Kwinana Freeway, sth of Anketell Rd 11.09 12.11 - Spectacles Dve, sth of Anketell Rd 0.08 0.13 - Abercrombie Rd, sth of Anketell Rd 1.65 1.32 - Fremantle - Rockingham CAH, sth of Anketell Rd - 6.17 - Rockingham Rd, sth of Anketell Rd 6.35 1.87

- Total Southern Screenline 19.17 21.60

• Grand Total 100.00 100.00

Source: Derived by Uloth and Associates from Main Roads WA Sub-Area Matrices.

8 4.5 FUTURE ROAD NETWORKS

The various assumptions made regarding the 2016 and 2031 road networks are documented in the following:

2016 Road Network • Roe Highway Stage 7 completed. • Karel Avenue/Berrigan Drive railway bridge constructed. • Farrington Street downgraded to 2 lanes between Karel Avenue and Kwinana Freeway. • Warton Road widened to 4 lanes divided between Armadale Road and Nicholson Road. • Railway station completed at Cockburn Central, with 470 parking spaces west of Kwinana Freeway and 1,036 parking spaces east of Kwinana Freeway. • Prinsep Road - Verde Drive link constructed around Jandakot Industrial Area. • Wentworth Avenue completed to Hammond Road. • Tapper Road completed and linked to extension of Gibbs Road. • Hammond Road - Frankland Avenue link constructed from Russell Road to Rowley Road and south into Mandogalup. • Rowley Road extended from Frankland Avenue to Rockingham Road. • Spearwood Avenue extended to Cockburn Road. • Spearwood Avenue completed between Sudlow Road and Barrington Street. • Construction of Spearwood Avenue - Henderson Road link between Beeliar Drive and Russell Road. • Beeliar Drive completed to Stock Road and extended through to Cockburn Road. • Cockburn Road realigned at Port Coogee development. • Ocean Road extended from Hamilton Road to Rockingham Road. • New Road constructed between Spearwood Avenue and North Lake Road within Bibra Lake Industrial Area.

An alternative forecast has also been carried out to include the extension of North Lake Road via a bridge over Kwinana Freeway to link with Prinsep Road - Verde Drive within the Jandakot Industrial Area.

2031 Road Network • Stock Road grade separated interchanges at Forrest Road, Spearwood Avenue, Barrington Street, Beeliar Drive, Russell Road and Rowley Road. • Indirect connection from Stock Road to Phoenix Road via new link to interchange at Forrest Road. • No connection of Rockingham Road to Stock Road south of Beeliar Drive. • Cockburn Road - Russell Road link constructed along western side of Lake Coogee. • Spearwood Avenue - Henderson Road link extended via Power Avenue to Rowley Road and then further south to Anketell Road as part of the Hope Valley/Wattleup redevelopment. • Rockingham Road realigned south of Rowley Road as part of Hope Valley/Wattleup redevelopment. • North Lake Road extended via bridge over Kwinana Freeway to link with Prinsep Road - Verde Drive within the Jandakot Industrial Area. • Bartram Road bridge constructed over Kwinana Freeway. • Additional railway stations constructed at Berrigan Drive, Russell Road and Rowley Road.

9 5. FUTURE TRAFFIC FORECASTS

The various traffic forecasts for both 2016 and 2031 are shown in Figure 5 to Figure 12, in Sections 5.1 and 5.2. The existing and future traffic flows on various road sections are then also presented in Tables 4 to 6 in Section 5.3, together with an indication of the required timing of road capacity improvements.

5.1 NORTH LAKE ROAD BRIDGE IN 2016

The initial traffic forecasts are based on the currently planned road network, which does not include the construction of Roe Highway Stage 8. However, an alternative forecast has also been prepared for 2016 to test the inclusion of the proposed North Lake Road bridge over Kwinana Freeway.

Figure 5 shows the 2016 weekday traffic flows without Roe Highway 8 and without the North Lake Road bridge, while Figure 6 shows 2016 weekday traffic flows without Roe Highway Stage 8 but with the North Lake Road bridge.

Figure 7 shows the 2016 traffic flow differences between the traffic shown in Figure 6 and that shown in Figure 5; that is the traffic flow differences resulting from the construction of the North Lake Road bridge.

It can be seen in Figure 7 that the main impact of the bridge will be a reduction of between 10,000 and 13,000 vehicles per day on Beeliar Drive and Armadale Road at the Kwinana Freeway interchange. However, smaller reductions will also occur on Berrigan Drive and Russell Road/Gibbs Road.

5.2 ROE HIGHWAY STAGE 8

Figure 8 shows the 2016 weekday traffic flows without the North Lake Road bridge but with Roe Highway Stage 8.

The 2016 traffic flow differences resulting from the construction of Roe Highway Stage 8 can therefore be identified by comparing Figure 8 with Figure 5, as shown in Figure 9.

It can be seen in Figure 9 that the construction of Roe Highway Stage 8 would increase traffic flows on both Stock Road and Forrest Road. However, significant reductions in traffic would also occur on Phoenix Road, North Lake Road, Farrington Street, Bibra Drive, Berrigan Drive, Beeliar Drive, Russell Road, and Rowley Road, together with a major decrease in traffic flows along South Street.

Figures 10, 11 and 12 show the corresponding traffic forecasts and traffic flow differences for 2031.

5.3 SUMMARY OF EXISTING AND FUTURE TRAFFIC FLOWS AND TIMING OF REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS

Tables 4, 5 and 6 provide a summary of existing and future traffic flows on selected road links throughout the study area (without Roe Highway Stage 8), together with an indication of timing for required improvements to road network capacity.

Table 4 includes all of the significant east-west roads within the City of Cockburn, while Tables 5 and 6 include the north-south roads west of Kwinana Freeway and east of Kwinana Freeway, respectively.

In addition to the information provided with the Tables, the following conclusions are also drawn:

• Warton Road will need to be widened to 4 lanes divided in the short term, as a direct result of the Forrestdale urban development immediately east of Warton Road.

• Armadale Road will also require widening to 4 lanes divided in the short term, and intersection controls particularly at Warton Road and Tapper Road will need to be investigated.

• Intersection treatments will also need to be investigated along North Lake Road, at Bibra Drive and the new access road to the industrial area.

• Hammond Road south of Beeliar Drive will not require widening to 4 lanes divided at least until after 2016. A high standard 2 lane road may even be sufficient in the long term.

• A high standard 2 lane road should also be sufficient for Henderson Avenue, between Beeliar Drive and Russell Road. Although its extension along Power Avenue, between Russell Road and Rowley Road may require 4 lanes divided in the long term.

• The construction of Roe Highway Stage 8 would reduce east-west traffic flows along various major roads including South Street, Beeliar Drive - Armadale Road, Russell Road, Rowley Road, and even Anketell Road. However, of more particular significance for this study it would also result in substantial reductions to traffic on the following roads, as shown in Figures 9 and 12: - Farrington Road, - Phoenix Road, - Bibra Drive, - North Lake Road, - Berrigan Drive, and - Osprey Drive.

12 TABLE 4 EXISTING AND FUTURE TRAFFIC FLOWS AND REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS (WITHOUT ROE HIGHWAY STAGE 8) CITY OF COCKBURN – EAST/WEST ROADS

EXISTING EXISTING 2016 2031 ROAD SECTION TRAFFIC 1) No of LANES TRAFFIC 2) TRAFFIC 3) REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS AND TIMING

Farrington Road - North Lake Rd to Bibra Dr 18,900 2L 14,170 17,210 No improvements required (2L). - Bibra Dr to Kwinana Freeway 25,120 4LD 32,770 42,290 No improvements required (4LD).

Forrest Road - West of Stock Rd 7,570 2L 9,200 9,940 No improvements required (2L). - East of Stock Rd 9,240 2L 13,060 13,510 No improvements required (2L).

Phoenix Road - West of Stock Rd 15,820 4LD 22,410 26,000 No improvements required (4LD). - East of Stock Rd 22,920 4LD 38,440 36,590 No improvements required (4LD).

Spearwood Avenue - Cockburn Rd to Hamilton Rd - - 6,390 7,400 2L, when needed for local access. - Hamilton Rd to Rockingham Rd 4,060 2LD 5,870 7,000 No improvements required (2LD). - Rockingham Rd to Stock Rd 5,590 2LD 10,280 13,860 No improvements required (2LD).

Ocean Road - West of Hamilton Rd - - 3,190 4,740 2L, when needed for local access. - East of Hamilton Rd - 2L 3,720 3,010 No improvements required (2L).

Barrington Street - West of Stock Rd 5,390 2L 10,140 8,450 No improvements required (2L). - East of Stock Rd 6,740 2L 12,540 17,100 No improvements required (2L).

Berrigan Drive - East of North Lake Rd 10,020 2LD 15,970 15,680 No improvements required (2LD). - West of Kwinana Freeway 13,580 4LD 35,500 39,390 No improvements required (4LD).

Jandakot Road - West of Solomon Rd - 2L 5,310 6,600 No improvements required (2L). - East of Solomon Rd 3,890 2L 11,800 15,950 No improvements required (2L).

Beeliar Drive - West of Rockingham Rd 5,070 2L 9,090 15,540 No improvements required (2L). - Rockingham Rd to Spearwood Ave 9,260 2L 16,440 30,140 Upgrade to 4LD soon after 2016. (…cont’d)

13 TABLE 4 (cont’d) EXISTING AND FUTURE TRAFFIC FLOWS AND REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS (WITHOUT ROE HIGHWAY STAGE 8) CITY OF COCKBURN – EAST/WEST ROADS

EXISTING EXISTING 2016 2031 ROAD SECTION TRAFFIC 1) No of LANES TRAFFIC 2) TRAFFIC 3) REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS AND TIMING

- Spearwood Ave to Hammond Rd 9,080 2L 28,670 34,970 Upgrade to 4LD by approximately 2011. - Hammond Rd to Wentworth Pde 15,110 4LD 32,370 35,520 No improvements required (4LD). - Wentworth Pde to Kwinana Fwy 28,600 4LD 58,990 53,190 Upgrade to 6LD before 2016.

Armadale Road - Kwinana Freeway to Solomon Rd 31,270 4LD 57,570 58,240 Upgrade to 6LD before 2016. - Solomon Rd to Warton Rd - 2L 42,940 57,780 Upgrade to 4LD in short term, the 6LD by 2031. - East of Warton Rd 15,880 2L 22,860 31,670 Upgrade to 4LD by 2016.

Russell Road - West of Rockingham Rd 12,370 2L 30,760 39,360 Upgrade to 4LD before 2016. - Rockingham Rd to Henderson Rd 6,170 2L 13,140 28,530 Upgrade to 4LD by approximately 2026. - Henderson Rd to Hammond Rd 7,030 2L 20,730 29,520 Upgrade to 4LD by 2016. - Hammond Rd to Kwinana Fwy 7,660 2L 24,430 31,420 Upgrade to 4LD by 2016.

Gibbs Road - Kwinana Freeway to Lyon Rd 5,050 2L 23,410 17,210 Upgrade to 4LD by 2016. - Lyon Rd to Liddelow Rd - 2L 8,620 6,040 No improvements required (2L).

Wattleup Road - Rockingham Rd to Power Ave 2,590 2L 9,150 11,980 No improvements required (2L). - Power Ave to Mandogalup Rd - 2L 10,000 13,520 No improvements required (2L). - East of Mandogalup Rd 1,450 2L 5,410 6,110 No improvements required (2L).

Rowley Road - Rockingham Rd to Power Ave - - 12,610 5,470 2L required. - Power Ave to Frankland Ave - - 12,770 29,590 2L required in 2016, upgraded to 4LD before 2031. - Frankland Ave to Kwinana Fwy 3,100 2L 17,510 34,650 Upgrade to 4LD before 2016. - Kwinana Freeway to Liddelow Rd 4,600 2L 14,130 17,030 No improvements required (2L).

Notes: 1) Existing Traffic flows from Figures 2 and 3. 2) 2016 Traffic Flows from Figure 5. 3) 2031 Traffic flows from Figure 10.

Source: Uloth and Associates

14 TABLE 5 EXISTING AND FUTURE TRAFFIC FLOWS AND REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS (WITHOUT ROE HIGHWAY STAGE 8) CITY OF COCKBURN – NORTH/SOUTH ROADS, WEST OF KWINANA FREEWAY

EXISTING EXISTING 2016 2031 ROAD SECTION TRAFFIC 1) No of LANES TRAFFIC 2) TRAFFIC 3) REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS AND TIMING

Cockburn Road - Rockingham Rd to Spearwood Ave 16,530 2L 13,340 18,280 No improvement required (2L). - Spearwood Ave to Beeliar Dr 14,940 2L 8,500 11,040 No improvement required (2L). - Beeliar Dr to Russell Rd - 2L 8,430 3,960 No improvement required (2L). - South of Russell Rd 11,570 2L 9,490 12,840 No improvement required (2L).

Hamilton Road - North of Rockingham Rd 13,570 2L 10,040 9,810 No improvement required (2L). - Rockingham Rd to Spearwood Ave 8,770 2L 9,870 12,260 No improvement required (2L). - Spearwood Ave to Beeliar Dr 8,500 2L 11,970 13,370 No improvement required (2L).

Rockingham Road - Cockburn Rd to Hamilton Rd 15,420 4L 24,060 25,490 No improvement required (4L). - Hamilton Rd to Spearwood Ave 18,990 4L 20,370 19,560 No improvement required (4L). - Spearwood Ave to Beeliar Dr 16,590 2L 14,540 15,690 No improvement required (2L).

Sudlow Road - Phoenix Rd to Spearwood Ave 6,600 2L 10,720 17,150 No improvement required (2L).

Spearwood Avenue (Miguel Road) - Stock Rd to Sudlow Rd 11,960 4LD 26,200 33,860 No improvement required (4LD). - Sudlow Rd to Beeliar Dr 7,970 2L 27,030 31,770 Upgrade to 4LD before 2016.

Henderson Road - Beeliar Dr to Russell Rd - - 10,590 14,600 2L for both 2016 and 2031.

Power Avenue - Russell Rd to Rowley Rd - - - 21,670 2L before 2026, then 4LD by 2031. - South of Rowley Rd - - - 21,260 2L before 2026, then 4LD by 2031.

North Lake Road - Farrington Rd to Forrest Rd 29,510 4LD 31,860 31,970 No improvement required (4LD). - Forrest Rd to Hammond Rd 28,310 4LD 41,030 43,630 No improvement required (4LD). - Hammond Rd to Kwinana Fwy 10,920 2L 22,750 33,100 Upgrade to 4LD before 2016. (…cont’d)

15 TABLE 5 (cont’d) EXISTING AND FUTURE TRAFFIC FLOWS AND REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS (WITHOUT ROE HIGHWAY STAGE 8) CITY OF COCKBURN – NORTH/SOUTH ROADS, WEST OF KWINANA FREEWAY

EXISTING EXISTING 2016 2031 ROAD SECTION TRAFFIC 1) No of LANES TRAFFIC 2) TRAFFIC 3) REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS AND TIMING

Bibra Drive - South of Farrington Rd 10,860 2L 16,320 18,190 No improvement required (2L). - North of North Lake Rd 6,520 2L 11,430 13,630 No improvement required (2L).

Osprey Drive - North Lake Rd to Beeliar Dr 7,710 2L 8,100 11,930 No improvement required (2L).

Semple Court - Berrigan Dr to North Lake Rd 3,010 2L 8,630 10,040 No improvement required (2L).

Poletti Road - North Lake Rd to Beeliar Dr - 2L 10,550 12,060 No improvement required (2L).

Hammond Road - North Lake Rd to Beeliar Dr 5,430 2L 10,410 15,240 No improvement required (2L). - Beeliar Dr to Russell Rd 5,800 2L 8,480 11,280 No improvement required (2L).

Frankland Avenue - Russell Rd to Rowley Rd - - 15,090 17,340 High standard 2L road required.

Wentworth Parade - North of Bartram Rd 1,740 4LD 18,970 20,310 No improvement required (4LD). - Bartram Rd to Hammond Rd 1,240 2L 10,290 9,970 No improvement required (2L).

Notes: 1) Existing Traffic flows from Figures 2 and 3. 2) 2016 Traffic Flows from Figure 5. 3) 2031 Traffic flows from Figure 10.

Source: Uloth and Associates

16 TABLE 6 EXISTING AND FUTURE TRAFFIC FLOWS AND REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS (WITHOUT ROE HIGHWAY STAGE 8) CITY OF COCKBURN – NORTH/SOUTH ROADS, EAST OF KWINANA FREEWAY

EXISTING EXISTING 2016 2031 ROAD SECTION TRAFFIC 1) No of LANES TRAFFIC 2) TRAFFIC 3) REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS AND TIMING

Karel Avenue - Farrington Rd to Hope Rd 12,700 2LD 16,280 19,140 No improvement required (2LD).

Berrigan Dr - Hope Rd to Prinsep Rd 11,300 2L 12,190 15,400 No improvement required (2L). - Prinsep Rd to Kwinana Freeway 15,530 2L 13,890 17,650 No improvement required (2L).

Prinsep Road - South of Berrigan Dr 2,030 2L 9,410 9,450 No improvement required (2L).

Solomon Road - South of Jandakot Rd - 2L 8,050 14,180 No improvement required (2L).

Warton Road - North of Jandakot Rd 11,450 2L 27,790 34,920 4LD in short term, with adjacent urban development. - Jandakot Rd to Armadale Rd - 2L 23,050 29,350 4LD in short term, with adjacent urban development.

Tapper Road - Armadale Rd to Bartram Rd 7,500 2L 7,730 6,220 No improvement required (2L). - Bartram Rd to Gibbs Rd - 2L 4,420 2,760 No improvement required (2L).

Lyon Road - Gibbs Rd to Rowley Rd - 2L 8,900 9,810 No improvement required (2L).

Liddelow Road - Armadale Rd to Gibbs Rd - 2L 9,620 8,990 No improvement required (2L). - Gibbs Rd to Rowley Rd 1,340 2L 6,050 6,300 No improvement required (2L).

Notes: 1) Existing Traffic flows from Figures 2 and 3. 2) 2016 Traffic Flows from Figure 5. 3) 2031 Traffic flows from Figure 10.

Source: Uloth and Associates

TECHNICAL APPENDIX

Detailed land use data within City of Cockburn is documented within this Technical Appendix.

A-1 A.1 DETAILED LAND USE DATA

Tables A.1 and A.2 show the detailed 2016 and 2031 land use data within City of Cockburn. The corresponding traffic zones are shown in Figure 1 in Section 1.1.

A-2 TABLE A.1 2016 LAND USE DATA WITHIN CITY OF COCKBURN

PRODUCTIONS ATTRACTIONS Industrial Shopping Centres Other Commercial TRAFFIC Floorspace Floorspace Floorspace ZONE 1) Population Dwellings (m2 GFA) Employees (m2 GFA) Employees (m2 GFA) Employees Other

666 2,860 985 ------

733 1,620 600 60,000 600 - - - - -

734 2,600 960 - - 7,500 214 - - -

735 2,759 1,360 - - 9,257 264 - - 1PS 2HS

736 1,989 1,004 - - 340 10 - - 1PS

737 1,679 814 - - 6,334 181 350 9 1PS

738 -1 730 322 - - 525 15 7,947 199 1PS -2 2,626 1,080 - - 485 14 2,340 58 1PS Total 738 3,356 1,402 - - 1,010 29 10,287 257 2PS

739 1,534 660 ------

740-1 1,055 455 - - 2,300 66 - - - -2 510 220 - - 32,937 941 - - 1PS Total 740 1,565 675 - - 35,237 1,007 - - 1PS

741 1,848 770 - - 725 21 - - -

742 -1 2,776 994 24,200 242 840 24 - - - -2 1,926 780 - - 5,542 158 - - 2PS -3 990 427 ------Total 742 5,692 2,201 24,200 242 6,382 182 - - 2PS

743 2,257 830 - - 150 4 - - 1PS

744-1 993 379 ------1 PS (…..cont’d) A-3 TABLE A.1 (cont’d) 2016 LAND USE DATA WITHIN CITY OF COCKBURN

-2 1,616 617 - - 120 3 - - - Total 744 2,609 996 - - 120 3 - - 1PS

745 5 2 60,000 600 - - - - -

746 1,491 700 55,000 550 930 27 - - TAFE

747 - - 120,000 1,200 - - - - -

748-1 - - 210,000 2,100 ------2 - - 210,000 2,100 - - - - - Total 748 - - 420,000 4,200 - - - - -

749-1 50 21 50,000 500 ------2 - - 83,000 830 1,595 46 - - - Total 749 50 21 133,000 1,330 1,595 46 - - -

750 1,716 650 50,000 500 - - - - -

751 344 134 ------

752 - - 38,924 389 - - - - -

753 74 30 ------

754-1 2,632 1,020 ------2 2,270 880 - - 4,675 134 - - 3PS Total 754 4,902 1,900 - - 4,675 134 - - 3PS

755 2,024 668 ------

756 1,357 585 - - 6,000 171 - - 1PS (….cont’d) A-4 TABLE A.1 (cont’d) 2016 LAND USE DATA WITHIN CITY OF COCKBURN

757 3,658 1,350 - - 3,000 86 - - 1PS

758 454 150 ------

760 - - 140,000 1,400 - - - - -

761 - - 300,000 3,000 - - - - -

762-1 - - 360,000 3,600 ------2 1,327 450 80,000 800 - - - - - Total 762 1,327 450 440,000 4,400 - - - - -

763 - - 220,000 2,200 - - - - -

764 2,811 1,385 - - 6,865 196 - - 1PS

765 697 280 ------

766 2,132 1,020 ------

767 1,094 410 - - 580 17 - - -

768 847 315 ------

769 ------

770 502 202 2,200 22 - - - - -

771-1 ------350 9 1PS + Adventure World -2 2,033 820 - - 1,610 46 - - 2 PS -3 2,137 862 ------Total 771 4,170 1,682 - - 1,610 46 350 9 3 PS +Adventure World (….cont’d)

A-5 TABLE A.1 (cont’d) 2016 LAND USE DATA WITHIN CITY OF COCKBURN

772-1 2,457 931 - - 13,964 399 - - 1PS -2 2,191 830 - - 100 3 - - 1HS Total 772 4,648 1,761 - - 14,064 402 - - 1PS 1 HS

773-1 1,272 480 - - - - 3,000 75 - -2 795 300 - - - - 570 14 - -3 - - - - 436 12 40,000 1,000 - -4 285 150 - - - - 9,000 225 - Total 773 2,352 930 - - 436 12 52,570 1,314 -

774-1 - - 170,000 1,700 ------2 668 281 30,000 300 400 11 - - - -3 ------4 950 500 - - - - 7,000 200 Station Car Park -5 - - - - 4,000 114 - - - -6 ------15,000 300 - -7 - - - - 3,500 100 - - - -8 - - - - 50,000 1,429 - - - Total 774 1,618 781 200,000 2,000 57,900 1,654 22,000 500 Station Car Park

775-1 ------15,000 300 Station Car Park -2 4,760 1,700 - - 3,350 96 - - 1PS 1HS -3 3,827 1,367 - - 6,000 171 - - 1PS 2PS 1HS Total 775 8,587 3,067 - - 9,350 267 15,000 300 Station Car Park

776-1 ------15,000 300 1HS -2 5,083 1,790 ------1PS -3 4,373 1,540 800 8 - - - - 1PS (….cont’d) A-6 TABLE A.1 (cont’d) 2016 LAND USE DATA WITHIN CITY OF COCKBURN

Total 776 9,456 3,330 800 8 - - 15,000 300 2PS 1HS

777 6,490 2,200 - - 4,000 114 - - 2PS

778 6,490 2,200 - - 2,000 57 - - 1PS

779-1 546 193 ------2 560 198 ------Total 779 1,106 391 ------

780 - - 160,000 1,600 - - - - -

781-1 - - 21,571 216 ------2 1,346 530 - - 1,625 46 - - - -3 317 125 ------Total 781 1,663 655 21,571 216 1,625 46 - - -

782-1 - - 150,000 1,500 ------2 217 80 16,688 167 ------3 136 50 ------4 163 60 3,920 39 ------5 204 75 ------6 3 1 ------Total 782 723 266 170,608 1,706 - - - - -

27PS 5HS + TAFE + Adventure World Grand Total 105,156 40,772 2,616,303 26,163 181,685 5,190 115,557 2,689 + 2 Station Car Parks

Note: 1) Traffic Zones are as shown in Figure 1.

Source: Uloth and Associates A-7 TABLE A.2 2031 LAND USE DATA WITHIN CITY OF COCKBURN

666 2,462 985 ------

733 5,900 2,360 60,000 600 4,500 129 - - 1PS

734 3,200 1,280 - - 11,700 334 - - -

735 2,657 1,377 - - 9,257 264 - - 1PS 2HS

736 1,897 1,004 - - 340 10 - - 1PS

737 1,773 900 - - 6,334 181 350 9 1PS

738 -1 709 327 - - 525 15 7,947 199 1PS -2 2,343 1,080 - - 485 14 2,340 59 1PS Total 738 3,052 1,407 - - 1,010 29 10,287 258 2PS

739 1,474 667 ------

740-1 914 455 - - 2,300 66 - - - -2 522 260 - - 32,937 941 - - 1PS Total 740 1,436 715 - - 35,237 1,007 - - 1PS

741 2,257 1,065 - - 725 21 - - -

742-1 2,607 1,124 - - 840 24 - - - -2 1,856 800 - - 5,542 158 - - 2PS -3 990 427 ------Total 742 5,453 2,351 - - 6,382 182 - - 2PS

743 2,024 840 - - 150 4 - - 1PS

744-1 1,180 480 ------1PS (…..cont’d) A-8 TABLE A.2 (cont’d) 2031 LAND USE DATA WITHIN CITY OF COCKBURN

-2 1,517 617 - - 120 3 - - - Total 744 2,697 1,097 - - 120 3 - - 1PS

745 5 2 93,000 930 - - - - -

746 1,555 814 138,600 1,386 930 27 - - TAFE

747 - - 150,000 1,500 - - - - -

748-1 - - 252,000 2,520 ------2 - - 255,000 2,550 - - - - - Total 748 - - 507,000 5,070 - - - - -

749-1 - - 297,200 2,972 ------2 - - 135,000 1,350 1,595 46 - - - Total 749 - - 432,200 4,322 1,595 46 - - -

750 1,976 800 400,000 4,000 1,250 36 - - 1PS

751 324 134 ------

752 - - 38,924 389 - - - - -

753 172 70 ------

754-1 2,636 1,030 ------2 2,278 890 - - 4,675 134 - - 3PS Total 754 4,914 1,920 - - 4,675 134 - - 3PS

755 2,024 728 - - 1,000 29 - - -

756 1,523 743 - - 6,000 171 - - 1PS (….cont’d) A-9 TABLE A.2 (cont’d) 2031 LAND USE DATA WITHIN CITY OF COCKBURN

757 3,718 1,430 - - 3,000 86 - - 1PS

758 1,588 643 ------

760 - - 230,000 2,300 - - - - -

761 - - 310,000 3,100 - - - - -

762-1 - - 480,000 4,800 ------2 1,280 512 115,000 1,150 - - - - - Total 762 1,280 512 595,000 5,950 - - - - -

763 - - 280,000 2,800 - - - - -

764 2,673 1,385 - - 6,865 196 - - 1PS

765 699 290 ------

766 2,048 1,040 ------

767 987 420 - - 580 17 - - -

768 768 315 ------

769 ------

770 588 270 2,200 22 - - - - -

771-1 ------350 9 1PS + Adventure Word -2 1,918 820 - - 1,610 46 - - 2PS -3 2,017 862 ------Total 771 3,935 1,682 - - 1,610 46 350 9 3PS + Adventure World (…..cont’d)

A-10 TABLE A.2 (cont’d) 2031 LAND USE DATA WITHIN CITY OF COCKBURN

772-1 2,327 931 - - 13,964 399 - - 1PS -2 2,175 870 - - 100 3 - - 1HS Total 772 4,502 1,801 - - 14,064 402 - - 1PS 1HS

773-1 1,190 494 - - - - 3,000 75 - -2 1,904 790 - - - - 14,000 350 - -3 - - - - 436 12 45,000 1,125 - -4 285 150 - - - - 9,000 225 - Total 773 3,379 1,434 - - 436 12 71,000 1,775 -

774-1 - - 186,000 1,860 ------2 652 281 49,000 490 400 11 - - - -3 ------4 1,159 610 - - - - 9,000 257 Station Car Park -5 - - - - 6,000 171 - - - -6 ------15,000 300 - -7 - - - - 5,000 143 - - - -8 - - - - 60,000 1,714 - - - Total 774 1,811 891 235,000 2,350 71,400 2,039 24,000 557 Station Car Park

775-1 ------15,000 300 Station Car Park -2 4,267 1,700 - - 3,350 96 - - 1PS 1HS -3 3,431 1,367 - - 6,000 171 - - 1PS 2PS 1HS Total 775 7,698 3,067 - - 9,350 267 15,000 300 Station Car Park

776-1 ------20,400 408 1HS -2 5,170 2,060 ------1PS -3 4,016 1,600 800 8 - - - - 1PS (…..cont’d) A-11 TABLE A.2 (cont’d) 2031 LAND USE DATA WITHIN CITY OF COCKBURN

Total 776 9,186 3,660 800 8 - - 20,400 408 2PS 1HS

777 6,600 2,500 - - 9,000 257 - - -

778 6,305 2,260 - - 2,000 57 - - 1PS

779-1 533 215 ------2 602 243 ------Total 779 1,135 458 ------

780 - - 300,000 3,000 - - - - -

781-1 - - 21,571 216 ------2 1,245 530 - - 1,625 46 - - - -3 293 103 ------Total 781 1,538 633 21,571 216 1,625 46 - - -

782-1 - - 400,000 4,000 ------2 215 86 16,688 167 ------3 162 65 ------4 325 130 3,920 39 ------5 215 86 ------6 3 1 ------Total 782 920 368 42008,6 4,206 - - - - -

27PS 5HS + TAFE + Adventure World Grand Total 110,133 46,318 4,214,903 42,149 211,135 6,032 141,387 3,316 + 2 Station Car Parks

Note: 1) Traffic Zones are as shown in Figure 1.

Source: Uloth and Associates A-12