{Replace with the Title of Your Dissertation}

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

{Replace with the Title of Your Dissertation} View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy ONLINE COLLABORATIVE CONSUMPTION: EXPLORING MEANINGS, MOTIVATIONS, COSTS, AND BENEFITS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY JUNG MEE MUN FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY KIM K. P. JOHNSON, ADVISOR JUNE 2013 Copyright © 2013 by Jung Mee Mun All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation would not have been possible without the support of many people. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisor, Dr. Kim K.P. Johnson for her guidance, generosity, and continuous support. She has been a source of inspiration and I feel grateful to have her as my advisor. I would also like to thank my committee members, Dr. Hye-Young Kim, Dr. Juanjuan Wu, and Dr. Marti Gonzales for their constant encouragement and valuable suggestions for this research. Finally, I wish to thank my parents for their patience, support, and endless love. i ABSTRACT This research aimed to provide an in-depth understanding of the experience of online collaborative consumption. Collaborative consumption encompasses the sharing, renting, or swapping of goods, information, and resources. This form of consumption is being reinvented as a result of the Internet. The specific research questions of this study were: (1) What is the nature of the lived experiences of collaborative consumers? (2) Who are collaborative consumers? (3) What motivates/deters engagement in collaborative consumption? (4) What criteria are used to assess collaborative consumption opportunities? (5) What limitations exist concerning the growth of collaborative consumption? (6) What does being an active collaborative consumer mean to these individuals? (7) How has participation in collaborative consumption impacted views or behaviors concerning consumption in general? This study was conducted in three different collaborative consumption contexts: product service system, redistribution market, and collaborative lifestyle, to gain a holistic understanding of collaborative consumption. Using a phenomenological approach, 30 collaborative consumers participated in in-depth interviews. A range of motivations, benefits, costs, and meanings associated with collaborative consumption were revealed. Participants’ primary motive to consume collaboratively was economic (e.g., to save and earn money), followed by social (e.g., to give or gain support), functional (e.g., reduce clutter), environmental, and personal (e.g., keep up with fashion trends) motivations. The majority of participants indicated that social benefits (i.e., forming relationships, socializing) were the most important benefits of collaborative consumption. The ii collaborative consumption website became a venue for participants to not only share possessions but also their knowledge, ideas, and concerns. Several participants identified trust concerns associated with collaborative consumption. To build trust, online reputation (e.g., reviews) was a significant criterion on which participants relied. A range of meanings for collaborative consumption emerged from personal (e.g., removing clutter, freedom) to broader meanings (e.g., community building, fostering social responsibility). Participation in collaborative consumption impacted changes in views and behaviors. Participants became sensitive to discounts and felt uncomfortable buying things new. Participants also shared that they increased or shifted to buying environmentally friendly or sustainable products. Discussion of the findings, limitations, and suggestions for future research were also provided. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................................................................................... ii List of Tables .................................................................................................................... vii List of Figures .................................................................................................................. viii CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 1 Context and Background................................................................................................. 1 Consumption Trendswithin the U.S. ......................................................................... 1 Consumerism. ...................................................................................................... 1 Anti-Consumerism. ............................................................................................. 6 Emerging Consumption Trend: Collaborative Consumption .................................... 7 Systems of Collaborative Consumption. ........................................................... 10 Statement of Purpose and Research Questions ............................................................. 12 Rationale and Significance of Study ............................................................................. 14 Definitions of Key Terminology used ......................................................................... 16 CHAPTER II. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE ......................................... 17 Sharing ......................................................................................................................... 17 Collaborative Consumption Characteristics ................................................................. 17 Detailed Discussion of the Three Systems of Collaborative Consumption .................. 23 Motivations for Collaborative Consumption ................................................................ 26 Benefits to Collaborative Consumption ........................................................................ 30 Impediments to Collaborative Consumption ................................................................ 32 CHAPTER III. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................. 37 Research Approach ....................................................................................................... 38 Research Sample ........................................................................................................... 39 Data Collection ............................................................................................................. 40 Data Analysis ................................................................................................................ 44 Ethical Consideration .................................................................................................... 45 Issues of Trustworthiness.............................................................................................. 46 CHAPTER IV. FINDINGS ........................................................................................... 49 Participants’ Characteristics.......................................................................................... 49 Collaborative Consumption Experience ....................................................................... 52 Collaborative Consumption Process....................................................................... 52 Product Service System. ................................................................................... 52 Redistribution Market....................................................................................... 57 iv Collaborative Lifestyle ..................................................................................... 62 Successful and Unsuccessful Experiences. ............................................................ 66 Successful Experiences. ................................................................................... 67 Unsuccessful Experiences. ............................................................................... 71 Motivations for Collaborative Consumption ................................................................ 73 Economical Motivation. ......................................................................................... 73 To Pay Less and Gain Value. ........................................................................... 74 Obligation to Save Money ................................................................................ 75 To Earn Money ................................................................................................. 76 Functional Motivation. ........................................................................................... 77 For Convenience............................................................................................... 77 To Reduce Clutter............................................................................................. 78 Environmental Motivation...................................................................................... 79 Social Motivation. .................................................................................................. 80 Give or Gain Social Support............................................................................. 80 Personal Motivation................................................................................................ 81 To Keep Up-to-Date with Fashion Trends. ...................................................... 82 To Gain Nostalgic Pleasure .............................................................................. 82 To Prepare for Future Needs
Recommended publications
  • How Sustainable Is the Sharing Economy? on the Sustainability Connotations of Sharing Economy Platforms
    Journal of Cleaner Production 206 (2019) 419e429 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Cleaner Production journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jclepro How sustainable is the sharing economy? On the sustainability connotations of sharing economy platforms Andrea Geissinger a, b, Christofer Laurell c, d, Christina Oberg€ a, b, *, Christian Sandstrom€ b, e a Orebro€ University, School of Business, SE-701 82, Orebro,€ Sweden b The Ratio Institute, P.O. Box 3203, SE-103 64, Stockholm, Sweden c Stockholm School of Economics, P.O. Box 6501, SE-113 83, Stockholm, Sweden d Jonk€ oping€ University, P.O. Box 1026, SE-551 11, Jonk€ oping,€ Sweden e Sciences and Technology Studies, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden article info abstract Article history: The sharing economy has evolved and spread to various sectors of the economy. Its early idea linked to Received 1 December 2017 the creation of more sustainable uses of resources. Since then, the development of the sharing economy Received in revised form has included a professionalization with self-employed suppliers rather than peers, and the question is 31 March 2018 whether the platforms following this development maintain the focus on sustainability. This paper Accepted 24 September 2018 describes and classifies the sustainability connotation of sharing economy platforms. It analyses 121 Available online 25 September 2018 platforms derived through social media analytics to figure out whether they describe themselves as sustainable. The findings suggest that the sustainability connotation closely connects to specific sectors Keywords: Platform such as fashion, on-demand services and logistics. Meanwhile, the dominant role model platforms do not fi Sharing economy communicate about being sustainable.
    [Show full text]
  • Reuse Explorations Guide Innovative Programs and Strategies
    Reuse Explorations Guide Innovative Programs and Strategies Written by Athena Lee Bradley and Mary Ann Remolador Northeast Recycling Council, Inc. (NERC) With funding from the Rural Utility Services, United States Department of Agriculture NERC is an equal opportunity provider and employer. August 2016 Acknowledgements The Northeast Recycling Council, Inc. (NERC) is a nonprofit organization that conducts projects in the eleven Northeast states, as well as around the country. Its mission is to promote sustainable materials management by supporting traditional and innovative solid waste best practices, focusing on waste prevention, toxics reduction, reuse, recycling and organics recovery. NERC received a grant from the United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Utility Services for “Innovative Strategies & Best Management Practices for Implementing Reuse Programs in Rural Communities in New York State & the St. Regis Mohawk Nation.” Through the project NERC provided webinars, trainings, resources, and technical assistance. The following individuals and organizations provided invaluable and generous assistance in the development and implementation of the project. NERC would like to extend its appreciation to and acknowledge the following people who worked with NERC on reuse: • Jan M. Oatman, Regional Recycling Coordinator, Development Authority of the North Country • St. Lawrence County Reuse Partnership: John Tenbusch, St. Lawrence County Environmental Management Council; Larry Legault, Operations/Recycling Manager, St. Lawrence County Solid Waste Operations; Chelle Lindahl, Co-Coordinator, Local Living Venture; and, Jennifer Lauzon, New York Department of Environmental Conservation, Region 6 • Larry Thompson, Recycling Coordinator, Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe (Akwesasne) • Catherine (Katie) Liendecker & others with Lyons Falls, New York and Lyons Falls Alive • MaryEllen Etienne, The Reuse Institute • Diane Cohen, Executive Director, Finger Lakes ReUse, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Motivating Collaborative Consumption in Fashion: Consumer Benefits, Perceived Risks, Service Trust, and Usage Intention of Online Fashion Rental Services
    sustainability Article Motivating Collaborative Consumption in Fashion: Consumer Benefits, Perceived Risks, Service Trust, and Usage Intention of Online Fashion Rental Services Sae Eun Lee 1, Hye Jung Jung 2,* and Kyu-Hye Lee 1,* 1 Human-Tech Convergence Program, Department of Clothing and Textiles, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea; [email protected] 2 Da Vinci College of General Education, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected] (H.J.J.); [email protected] (K.-H.L.) Abstract: This study explored the conceptual constructs of consumer benefits and perceived risks of online fashion rental services (Online FRS) and their impacts on usage intention towards Online FRS. The mediating roles of perceived risks and service trust were examined in this research. A survey was performed on female shoppers between the ages of 20–30 residing in a metropolitan area. Results of this research were as follows: (1) The results analyzing the sub-dimension of benefits (Reasonable cost, Wearing at right time, place and occasion (TPO), Space Saving, Entertaining, Product Variety, Style Conformity) and perceived risks (Financial, Performance, Social) clearly presented factorial structures. (2) Reasonable cost, Style Conformity, and Product Variety showed significantly positive influences on usage intentions towards online fashion rental services; in addition, Financial, Performance, and Social risks of rental services had a negative effect on usage intentions. (3) Service trust and consumer perceptions of Financial and Performance risks had important mediating roles in the relationship Citation: Lee, S.E.; Jung, H.J.; Lee, between consumer benefits and usage intentions towards Online FRS. This study highlighted that K.-H.
    [Show full text]
  • Embracing the Peer-Production Economy
    Embracing the Peer-Production Economy Eli Lehrer and Andrew Moylan nthusiasts of the growing “peer-production” or “sharing” Eeconomy are convinced that the new decentralized, technology-based approach to connecting consumers and providers of services is going to revolutionize commerce and transform modern life. The true promise of this emerging sector — which has taken the form of ride-sharing apps like Uber, space-sharing platforms like Airbnb, work-sharing businesses like TaskRabbit, and a host of other emerging digital services — remains to be seen. But it is already becoming apparent that the sharing economy could have some significant political implications. The key political questions are to what extent peer-production ser- vices should be regulated and how. These are particularly challenging questions for the left. Taking an accommodating, hands-off approach to such regulation would appeal to the educated, young, urban con- sumers of such services who tend to be liberals, but it would run the risk of alienating core liberal constituencies like unions, trade guilds, and trial lawyers — not to mention undercutting the default progressive faith in the wisdom of the regulatory state. For the right, there is more opportunity than risk, but making the most of it would require finding a way to shape a free-market message that would appeal to the largely young, wealthy city-dwellers who use sharing services and for whom the broader conservative agenda is largely anathema. Managing the peer-production economy in a prudent fashion and standing up for its interests has the potential to pay huge political divi- dends for the party that does it best, but it will not be easy.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Marketplaces in the 21St Century: Building Community Through Sharing Events
    Journal of Consumer Behaviour, J. Consumer Behav. 11: 303–315 (2012) Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/cb.1389 Alternative marketplaces in the 21st century: Building community through sharing events PIA A. ALBINSSON1* and B. YASANTHI PERERA2 1Appalachian State University, The Walker College of Business, Department of Marketing, Boone, NC, USA 2New Mexico State University, College of Business, Department of Management, Las Cruces, NM, USA ABSTRACT We examine alternative consumption including collaborative consumption, sharing, and unconsumption (i.e., postconsumption activities such as upcycling, reuse, recycling, etc.) at non-monetary-based private and public sharing events including Really Really Free Markets (RRFMs). These alternative marketplaces (RRFMs) were initially organized by the Anarchist Movement as a form of resistance to the capitalist economic model. However, many consumer groups now utilize this model to stage public sharing events as a means of raising awareness about various issues including sustainability and overconsumption. Participants bring, share, and take goods without any expectation of monetary or other exchange. There is limited research on collaborative consumption and sharing in non-monetary marketplaces. We address this gap by exploring alternative marketplaces, organized by consumers for consumers, utilizing qualitative research methods. Our findings indicate that a sense of community is both a driver of participation and an outcome of these events. Organizers and participants utilize these venues to share knowledge and possessions for various ideological and practical reasons. Our findings also indicate that these events challenge the entrenched notions of exchange and reciprocity. Our research contributes to the literature by highlighting the importance of community, collaboration, and changing consumer mindsets to the success of such sharing efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Hennepin County Zero Waste Guide
    Zero waste guide Tips and tricks for a low-waste lifestyle Welcome to the Zero Waste Challenge! This guide includes information about many actions you can take to reduce waste. The guide also includes planning worksheets, templates, and sample recipes to provide assistance and inspiration in setting goals, tracking your progress, and taking action. Developing low-waste habits is a gradual process. Start with actions that make sense for you and your family. Focus on what will motivate you and the others in your household – whether that be improving your health, saving money, or protecting the environment. Try different actions to find what works for you, and build on your successes to keep slashing your trash bit by bit. Contents Getting started: diverting waste . 3 Conduct a household waste sort ...........................................................................................4 Get everyone on board.....................................................................................................4 Recycling and compost everything you can ................................................................................4 Recycling 101 ..............................................................................................................5 Composting and organics recycling 101 ....................................................................................8 Backyard composting basics................................................................................................9 Organics recycling.........................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Collaborative Economy in NSW
    Review of the collaborative economy in NSW NSW Department of Finance, Services and Innovation October 2015 Review of the collaborative economy in NSW Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... i 1 What is the collaborative economy? ............................................................................... 8 1.1 Definition .......................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Features of the collaborative economy............................................................................ 10 1.3 Economics of the collaborative economy......................................................................... 11 1.4 The rise of the collaborative economy in Australia ........................................................... 12 2 Transportation and automotive..................................................................................... 16 2.1 Ridesharing ..................................................................................................................... 16 2.2 Car sharing ...................................................................................................................... 18 2.3 Peer-to-peer car sharing services .................................................................................... 19 3 Accommodation services .............................................................................................. 20 3.1
    [Show full text]
  • Moralessanchezpaulaximena20
    PRECYCLE THE ATTITUDE OF THE CONSUMER PAULA XIMENA MORALES SANCHEZ PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD JAVERIANA FACULTAD DE ARQUITECTURA Y DISEÑO CARRERA DE DISEÑO INDUSTRIAL Bogotá D.C. 2011 PRECYCLE THE ATTITUDE OF THE CONSUMER AUTOR PAULA XIMENA MORALES SANCHEZ Presentado para optar al título de Diseño Industrial DIRECTORES PIER PAOLO PERUCCIO ALESSANDRA RASETTI PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD JAVERIANA FACULTAD DE ARQUITECTURA Y DISEÑO CARRERA DE DISEÑO INDUSTRIAL Bogotá D.C. 2011 Nota de advertencia: Artículo 23 de la Resolución No. 13 de Julio 1946 “La universidad no se hace responsable por los conceptos emitidos por su s alumnos en sus trabajos de tesis. Solo velará por que no se publique nada contrario al dogma y a la moral católica y por qué las tesis no contengan ataques personales contra persona alguna, antes bien se ve en ellas el anhelo de buscar la verdad y la justicia.” Politecnico di Torino - I Facoltá di Architettura - a.a 2010/2011 Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Ecodesign Student: Paula Ximena Morales Sanchez Tutor: Pier Paolo Peruccio Co-tutor: Alessandra Rasetti Index Introduction 1 1. Consumption, brief story and actual situation 4 1.1 To consume 1.2 Modernism 1.2.1 Modern Consumption 1.3 Postmodern 1.3.1 Postmodern Consumption 1.3.2 Postmodern Consumer 1.4 Hypermodernism 1.4.1 Hypermodernism Consumption 1.4.2 Hypermodern Consumer 1.5 The big problem of consumption Summary 2. Collaborative Consumption 22 2.1 Collaborative Consumption, definition Consumer attitude and actions 2.2 New Economy Summary 3. Categories, activities and case studies
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting a Sharing Economy in a Small Town an Empirical Study Assessing Future Potential and Challenges in the Town of Norrtälje
    DEGREE PROJECT IN THE FIELD OF TECHNOLOGY CIVIL ENGINEERING AND URBAN MANAGEMENT AND THE MAIN FIELD OF STUDY THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, SECOND CYCLE, 30 CREDITS STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2020 Promoting a sharing economy in a small town An empirical study assessing future potential and challenges in the town of Norrtälje LISA LUNDSTRÖM KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT Title Swedish: Främja en delningsekonomi i en småstad: En empirisk studie som utvärderar framtida potential och utmaningar i Norrtälje stad Cover image: © Andrii Yalanskyi / Alamy Stock Photo Author: Lisa Lundström Supervisor: Åsa Callmer KTH - Division oF Urban and Regional Studies Date: 2020-06-25 Acknowledgements I would like to start by thanking my supervisor, Åsa Callmer, who, despite the very confusing times that the COVID-19 pandemic has presented this past spring, has ofFered great help and highly valued encouragements during this project. I would also like to thank all of the people who have taken their time to participate in this project in any shape or form, contributing with knowledge and insights crucial For the success of this study. Finally, I want to say thank you to my Friends and Family who always support me. Drawing on the Fact that this study marks the end oF five years oF studies at KTH for me, I would also like to acknowledge all of the wonderful people I’ve met on my journey and all of the valuable experiences I bring with me into the Future. I know that I leave KTH as a better, wiser and more confident person - and For that I am forever grateful.
    [Show full text]
  • DB Swiss Fundraising Bern 08-06-12.Pptx
    4. SwissFundraisingDay 2012, Bern «Zukunft Wirtschaft & Gesellschaft und Auswirkungen auf das Fundraising» Dr. David Bosshart I 855©GDI Freitag, 8. Juni 2012 Diese Präsentation ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Art des Vervielfältigens ist verboten. Wiedergaben sind nur mit schriftlicher Bewilligung des Autors erlaubt. This presentation is protected by copyright. Any form of copying is prohibited. Reproduction is permitted only subject to the written consent of the author. Die digitale Welt ist längst da . Können Sie: - Relevanter und bedeutungsvoller werden für mehr und mehr Kunden - Scale und Scope neu definieren - Sich anpassen an ein viel vernetzteres Umfeld und mit einem viel breiteren Set von Wettbewerbern umgehen, die Sie bislang noch nicht hatten - Definieren, wofür Sie stehen, weil klare substantielle Werte wichtiger denn je werden (Wofür stehen wir? Warum?) - Diversity managen, und zwar von Alter, Geschlecht, Nationen, Wünschen . - Kooperieren & mit neuen Partnerschaften umgehen (Frenemies, Freemium) - Flexibler werden bezüglich Kunden/Stakeholder Interaktion - Umgehen mit steigender Transparenz, Feedbackorientierung 1 GDI Gottlieb Duttweiler Institute Langhaldenstrasse 21 P.O. Box 531 CH-8803 Rüschlikon/Zurich Fon +41 44 724 61 11 www.gdi.ch [email protected] / photostream /o/in/ sizes /6246939024/ surisun / photos / www.flickr.com http:// 3 Welten, die sich heute überlappen 1. Industriekapitalismus + Wohlfahrtsstaat (Friedensraison – bis 1970er) 2. Finanzmärkte + Philanthrokapitalismus („Giving back“ – seit 80er) 3. Wissenskapitalismus + Social Networks (Sharing Economy, Fairness – ab 10er) 2 GDI Gottlieb Duttweiler Institute Langhaldenstrasse 21 P.O. Box 531 CH-8803 Rüschlikon/Zurich Fon +41 44 724 61 11 www.gdi.ch [email protected] Handlungsbedarf - 3 Ebenen der WS – wie weiter? - Bildungsinnovationen - Soziale Innovationen - Finanzmarktinnovationen - Demokratisierung Risk Management - Empathic Tech Was heisst “Social” in der digitalen Welt? Verliererbegriff der 90er & 00er wird Kultbegriff in den 10ern • Einsames Individuum vs.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2013 Reuse, Repair and Repurpose Strategy
    November 2013 Reuse, Repair and Repurpose Strategy Reuse, Repair and Repurpose Strategy The Regional Municipality of York Environmental Services Department 17250 Yonge Street, Newmarket, ON L3Y 6Z1 www.york.ca www.SM4RTLIVING.ca Accessible formats or communication supports are available upon request Contact: [email protected] or call 905-830-4444 Ext. 73000 Reuse, Repair and Repurpose Strategy Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 2.0 BACKGROUND AND TRENDS ........................................................................................ 1 2.1 TRADITIONAL APPROACHES TO REUSE ....................................................................................... 2 2.2 WHERE THE NEED REMAINS .................................................................................................... 4 2.3 INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO REUSE ......................................................................................... 7 3.0 REUSE STRATEGY ......................................................................................................... 8 3.1 NEW USES FOR OLD STUFF CAMPAIGN ...................................................................................... 8 3.1.1 New Uses for Old Stuff .................................................................................................. 9 3.1.2 Share your stuff........................................................................................................... 10
    [Show full text]
  • Flytenow's Petition for Writ of Certiorari
    No. _________ ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- FLYTENOW, INC., Petitioner, v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, Administrator, Respondent. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The District Of Columbia Circuit --------------------------------- --------------------------------- PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI --------------------------------- --------------------------------- JONATHAN RICHES* ADITYA DYNAR GOLDWATER INSTITUTE SCHARF-NORTON CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL LITIGATION 500 E. Coronado Rd. Phoenix, AZ 85004 (602) 462-5000 [email protected] *Counsel of Record Counsel for Petitioner ================================================================ COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964 WWW.COCKLELEGALBRIEFS.COM i QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. In deciding what level of deference is due an agency’s interpretation when it predominately inter- prets common law terms, five circuit courts of appeals have held no deference is due such an interpretation. Three others have held such an interpretation is “not entitled to great deference.” The D.C. Circuit here af- forded deference under Auer v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452 (1997) to the Federal Aviation Administration’s (“FAA”) legal interpretation predominately interpreting the common law term, “common carriage.” What, if any, def- erence is due
    [Show full text]