The Leningrad Dutch
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Batsford Chess Library The Leningrad Dutch Jaan Ehlvest An Owl Book Henry Holt and Company '\..._ . ' New York Henry Holt andCmnpany , Inc. Publishers since1866 115 West 18th Street New York, New York 10011 Henry Holt® is a registered trademark of Henry Holt and Company, Inc. Copyright© 1993 by jaan Ehlvest All rights reserved. First published in the Unjted States in 1993 by Henry Holt and Company, Inc. Originally published in Great Britainin 1993 by B. T. Batsford Ltd. Ubrary of Congress Catalog Card Number: 93-77841 ISBN G-8050-2944-3 (An Owl Book: pbk.) FirstAmerican Edition-1993 Printed in the United Kingdom All first editions are printed on acid-free paper. a::l 10 9 8 7 6 s 4 3 2 Adviser: R D. Keene, GM, OBE Technical Editor: Andrew Kinsman Contents Symbols 6 Introduction 7 1 Main line with 7 ... �e8 9 2 Main line with 7 ... c6 42 3 Main line with 7 ... � 61 4 Avoiding the Main lines 79 s Systems with an early b3 89 6 Systems with 4Jh3 m 7 Systems with c3 123 Index of Variations 135 Syn1bols + Check ++ Double check mate Checkmate Good move !! Excellent move ? Bad move ?? Blunder !? Interesting move ?! Dubious move ± Small advantage for White + Small advantage for Black ± Clear advantage for White + Clear advantage for Black +- Winning advantage for White -+ Winning advantage for Black The position is equal co The position is unclear co With counterplay 1-0 White wins G-1 Black wins 1 f24 Draw ol Olympiad izt Interzonal zt Zonal Ch Championship corr Correspondence Introduction The Dutch Leningrad system (1 d4 fS 2 g3 4::f6 3 .Qg2 g6) was first regularly studied and played in Leningrad during the mid 1930s. For a long time it was quite unpopular, although some top players occasionally used it as a reserve opening. However, the Dutch Defence, and particularly the Leningrad system, appeared more and more often in tournaments in the 1980s. This was due to the fact that, compared to many classical openings, the Dutch Defence in general, and the Leningrad system in particular, are much less heavily analysed. Unlike many other openings, the Leningrad rarely results in symmetrical positions leading to drawish endgames; play instead revolves around strategic situations in which creative solutions are required from both sides. This book has taken into account the opinion and practice of Mikhail Botvinnik and Mark Taimanov who greatly influeneced the development of the Leningrad system. A great deal of attention has also been paid to the games of grandmasters Mikhail Gurevich and Vladimir Malaniuk - the modem innovators of the Leningrad variation. Naturally all the important games of recent years are included. How should you read this book? Dear chess-friend, you should not take the analysis presented here as the final word but learning these ideas will help to develop your skills in understanding irregular positions. One should not concentrate on memorising every variation, although their importance should not be under estimated, but should instead learn the meaning of plans, themes and manoeuvres. After careful study the Leningrad system will be an invaluable addition to your repertoire, leading to dynamic positions with plenty of scope for original ideas. 1 Main Line with 7 ... tye8 1 d4 fS A 2 g3 4:)£6 8 dS (2) 3 ,Og2 g6 4 4:13 ,Og7 s o-o o-o 2 6 c4 d6 B !! 7 4Jc3 �e8 (f) 1 � J.��� � ?��f!:J�}--� w �.L·m.. w Il-L � w �.L�.. � � �1:� �:it�� -� � � �. N.."� �.r.--,. ·m. "'"�� � �. ��� · .. 9 "'� ""� � 9 · "'� ""� � ?'F '". Here Black has: 8 �. 8 �:;a.�. . ���ttm. · A1 8 ... 4Ja6 The system characterised by A2 8 ... aS 7 ... �e8 began to appear regu- larly in tournaments at the A1 startof the 1980s and has been 8 4Ja6 used often and successfully by Grandmaster Vladimir Malan- Now White usually chooses iuk. We will explore the fol- between: lowing lines for White: A11 9 4Jd4 A 8dS A12 9 Wl1 B 8b3 A13 9 �e3 and others C 8 �e1 D 8 4JdS A11 E 8�b3 9 4Jd4 (3) F 8 e4 In recent years 9 c£Jd4 has 10 Main line with 7 ... �e8 been seen relatively infrequent fxg3 17 fxg3 cxd5 18 cxd5 .Qg4 ly, as 9 frb1 has become the 19 '/tid2 and Black has difficul standard choice. ties in defending his pawn weaknesses; Sveshnikov - Gab 3 darkhmanov, USSR 1984. B b) 10 e3 c6 11 b3 (More active seems 11 ;gb1!? ;gb8 {11 ... cfJc7 12 b4 cxd5 13 cxd5 lJ.cB 14 a4 cf)aB 15 �b3t Gavrilov - Gurevich, USSR19 82} 12 a3 {12 b4 c5} 12 ... {F5 13b4 4jce4 14 {Jxe4 {Jxe4 15 '/tid3 c5 16 � .Q.xe6 17 dxe6 cxb4 18 axb4 '/ticS 19 .Q.xe4 fxe4 20 '/tixe4 gf6 21 �b 2 '/tixe6 22 9 .Q.d7 '/tid3 gff8 and Black has suc Instead of thls move there ceeded in maintaining the has also occurred 9 . c£jc5 10 balance; Knaak - Espig, East b3 (10 b4!?) 10 ... .Q.d7 11 .Q.b 2 a6 Germany 1984) 11 . 4jc7 12 .O.b 2 12 '/tic2 ;gb8 13 gael � 4 14 e3 c5 13 4)le2? (Better would be 13 g5 15 b4 @4 16 {Jxa4 .Q.xa4 17 c£Jf3 bS 14 '/tic2 with the idea of '/tie2 �d7 18 f4 with a slight 4)l2, f4, gael, e4 - Malaniuk) 13 advantagefor White; Uebert - ... b5 14 '/tic2 ;gb8. Already it is Okhotnik, Halle 1987. White who has problems and 10 e4 after 15 gael? bxc4 16 bxc4 This position has been much �4 Black gained the advan played and deeply analysed. tage in Beliavsky - Malaniuk, Instead of 10 e4, Botvinnik has USSR Ch 1983. suggested 10 c£jb3. In practice c) 10 b3 c6 (10 ... c5!? 11 4Jc2?! four more variations have been {11dxc6 bxc6 121J.b2 J1c8 13 !fb1 tried: cf'F5 14 b4 c£'Fe4 15 c£Jb3 �f7= a) 10 ge14jc5 (If 10 ... c6 11 e4 Magai - Petelin, USSR 1988} 11 fxe4 12 {Jxe4 {Jxe4 13 .O.xe4 ... 4:Je4 {11 ... bS!} 12 {Jxe4 �xa1 t;J::-7 14 ;gbt c5 15 4:Je2 with 13 c£jxa1 fxe4 14 -'lxe4 and equal chances, Kindermann - White has a slight initiative - Wegner, Hamburg 1991) 11 b3 (11 Tukmakov) 11 .Q.b2 {F7 12 '/tid2 '/tic2 c6 12 c£jb3? 4jce4! 13 {Jxe4 (12 gd ;gb8 13 '/tid2 c5 14 c£Jf3 a6 fxe4 14 .Q.xe4 '/tif7! 15 �e3 cxd5 {Dubious is the immediate 14 ... 16 cxd5 gfc8 17 '/tid3 {Jxe4 18 bS 15 cxbS cfJxbS16 cfJxbS !1xb5 '/tixe4 ,O_f5 19 '/tih4 .O.xb2+ Prak 17 1J.xf61J.xf6 18 �c2 with the hov - Bertholdt, Bad Salzungen idea of cfJi2 - c4 with a slight 1960) 11 . .. c6 12 .Q.b2 aS 13 ;gb1 g5 advantage for White according 14 e3 f4 15 exf4 gxf4 164jce2 to Kremenietsky} 15 '/tic2 bS 16 Main linewith 7 ... �eB 11 012 e5!? 17 dxe6 .O,xe6 18 .O,a1 {13 t£1;2?! b5 14 cxb5 fjxbS 15 {18 e4? is not suitable, e.g. 18 ... f)xb5 1J.xb5 16 f)a3 aS+ Larsen bxc4 19 bxc4 fxe4 20 cfjcxe4 - Yrjola, Espoo zt 1989 or 13 !!xb2+ - Kremenietsky} 18 ... fy61J.xe6 14 dxe6 [fbB= Cvet tt;Je7and a complicated position kovic - Malaniuk, Vmjacka with equal chances has arisen; Banja 1991} 13 ... �8 14 � b5 F. Lengyel - Kremenletsky, 15 cxb5 4JxbS 16 4Jc4 g5 17 Satu-Mare 1983) 12 ... cS 13 4Jf3 {jxbS�xbS 18 tt;Jc2 f 4 19 tt:;f5 h6 a6 14 gael bS 15 tt;Jd3 �8 16 .O,a1 20 gxf4 �d7 and Black has h6 17 � �4 18 e3 (Stefanov good prospects of counter - Marasescu, Romania 1983) play; Ry shk.ov - Zarubin, Lenin and White has an opportunity grad 1983) 12 .. e5 13 dxe6 (13 to obtain a dominating position dxc6 {13 cfjb3cxdS} 13 ... exd4 14 in the centre with the plan h3, cxd7 tt;Jxd7 15 4ja4 4Je4 16 �b 2 f4 and e4. bS+ - Tukmakov) 13 ... 4Jxe6 14 d) 10 �1!? (Apart from the 4Jh3!? (14 e3) 14 ... �4 15 �b 2 main line, this is the most 4]25 16 4Jd2 with an unclear logical plan, preparing action position; Tukmakov - Gurevich, on the queenside) 10 .. c6 (4) USSR 1982. (Not 10 ... c5? 11 4Je6!±) and d2) After 11 b4 Black found now: the interesting 11 .. 4Jxb4 and after 12 gxb4 c5 13 {)::b5 cxb4 14 4Jc 7 tt;Jc8 15 4Jxa8 4]24 16 �xe4 fxe4 17 �5 gf7 18 4Jc2 tt;Jxa8 19 4Jxb4 .O,h3 achieved a superior position in Karasev - Cherepkov, Leningrad 1984. Other games with 11 b4 show Black is able to achieve an active position, e.g. 11 ... c5 12 4Je6 cxb4 13 4Jxf8�8 14 4Jb5 .O,xbS 15 cxbS tt;JxbS 16 tt;;d2 gc8, as in Boguslawsky - Beim, Voskresensk 1992, where Black had very active play for the exchange and went on to win. d1) 11 b3 {[j::. 7 12 b4!? (Serious Or 11 b4 gc8 12 .O,a3 �f7 13 e3 attention should be paid to 12 cxd5 14 4Jxd5 gxc4 15 4Jxf6+ dxc6!? bxc6 13 b4 e5 14 4Jb3tt;Je7 Roder - Santo Roman, Lyon 15 e4!? with a somewhat better Open 1990, with complications. position for White. Dubious, d3) 11 a3 gc8 (11 ... 4Jc 7 12 e4 however, is 12 .Q.b2?! c5 13 4Jf3 e5 - Meulders) 12 b4 c5 13 4Je6 12 Main Line with 7 .. �eB �xe6 14 dxe6 cxb4 15 axb4 gxc4 16 �xb7 gxc3 17 �xa6 6 with an unclear position; Shvid- B ler - van Mil, Belgiwn 1987.