DOCSLIB.ORG

Obstetrical Ultrasound Training of and Practise by General Practitioners In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Obstetrical Ultrasound Training of and Practise by General Practitioners In Original Research Obstetrical ultrasound training of and practise by general practitioners in the private sector, Free State Foulkes S, MBChB, MFamMed Department of Family Medicine, University of the Free State Joubert G, BA, MSc Department of Biostatistics, University of the Free State Faber BL, MBChB, MMed (O+G) Hiemstra LA, MBChB, MPraxMed Department of Family Medicine, University of the Free State Correspondence: Prof. Gina Joubert, Department of Biostatistics, University of the Free State, PO Box 339 (G31), 9300, Bloemfontein. Fax: 051-4012939, Tel: 051-4013117, E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: general practitioners, ultrasound ABSTRACT Background: The aim of the study was to determine the level of obstetrical ultrasound training and practice of general practitioners in the Free State private sector. Methods: In this descriptive study, questionnaires were mailed to all general practitioners in the Free State private sector. The questionnaire included demographic information about the practitioner, the ultrasound profile of the practice, and the type of machine used. Results: Four hundred and eighty-one questionnaires were sent to general practitioners and 229 (47.6%) were returned. Of the 176 practising respondents, 47 (26.8%) used ultrasound. The majority of ultrasound examinations done per month were obstetrical. Eight practitioners had relevant qualifications for using ultrasound and more than a third (18, 38.3%) had no training in ultrasound use. Less than half (19, 40.4%) of the practitioners that use ultrasound were aware of the South African Association of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynaecology (SASUOG). Conclusions: The response to the questionnaire was low and may have influenced the results. The study indicates that there are general practitioners who perform ultrasound examinations without training. As general practitioners mainly do obstetrical ultrasound, it is recommended that the SASUOG play a bigger role in their training. A diploma course in ultrasound and support from medical aid organisations to only pay full fees to doctors who can prove that they have sufficient ultrasound training and competence will be ideal. (SA Fam Pract 2004;46(6): 25-27) Introduction of health care. obstetrics. The patient is intensely Prof. Ian Donald (1910-1987), an Ultrasound is often used in ob- involved in the ultrasound investiga- obstetrician from Scotland, intro- stetrics and gynaecology. A detailed tion and has the right to know the duced the diagnostic use of ultra- investigation of the developing foetus qualification level of the practitioner sound in clinical medicine. He pio- can be done long before birth, in- concerned. It is imperative to be neered the use of ultrasound in cluding the determination of multiple aware of the limitations of ultrasound. obstetrics and gynaecology to eval- pregnancies, foetal abnormalities, For example, if the patient presents uate the foetus without exposure to confirmation of gestational age and for the first time in the third trimester the dangers of X-ray. The idea was foetal well-being, and ectopic preg- of pregnancy, it is impossible to de- conceived from the use of ultrasound nancy can be diagnosed. Ultrasound termine foetal age.3 Results must to identify submarines during the equipment is sophisticated and ex- always be interpreted in conjunction Second World War.1 Prof. Donald’s pensive and the interpretation of with clinical data. first publication in the Lancet, in results is often difficult and uncertain. Rumours of missed diagnoses of 1958, included the use of ultrasound Since the procedure is so easy, mis- gross abnormalities and incorrect to identify pelvic tumours, molas and use by health care professionals treatment of patients by inadequately multiple pregnancies.2 Ultrasound without adequate training is possible. trained or inexperienced practition- has since become an integral part Ultrasound is a dynamic part of ers are common. There are docu- SA Fam Pract 2004;46(6) 25 Original Research mented cases of missed diagnoses had emigrated) were thus excluded training in ultrasound during their of hydrocephalus and anencephalus from the study. postgraduate studies (MFamMed 5, in pregnant women during the ultra- Practitioners who did not respond diploma 3). The median number of sound investigation.4 Ultrasound in- were contacted telephonically. The years that the general practitioners vestigations may be done for finan- questionnaire was again faxed to had used ultrasound was six (range cial gain, which has important the practitioner if he/she used ultra- 0 to 20 years). financial implications for medical aid sound. A record was also kept of The majority of ultrasound companies, added to the patient practitioners who are in the private examinations done per month were suffering financially and emotionally sector but who do not use ultra- obstetrical (median 20, range 0 to from the incorrect or unnecessary sound. 150), followed by gynaecological use of ultrasound. A pilot study to test the question- (median 3, range 0 to 30). Most prac- Accreditation of the ultrasound naire was done with the help of titioners (34, 72.3%) did all their practitioner before the service may registrars at the Department of ultrasound investigations them- be rendered is a prerequisite in Obstetrics and Gynaecology and selves, and only one of them did not various countries.5 Accreditation is the Department of Radiology at the sign the reports personally. Those not, however, a prerequisite in South University of the Free State. Unclear who indicated that the investigations Africa. There is concern that health questions were modified and addi- were done by someone else (13, care professionals without the tional questions were added, where 27.7%) included practitioners who necessary training misuse ultrasound necessary. The Ethics Committee of referred to other doctors for further as a diagnostic tool in this country. the Faculty of Health Sciences of the management or for a second opin- The aim of the study was to University of the Free State approved ion. Most practitioners (43, 93.5%) determine the level of obstetrical the protocol. All information was did not experience a problem when ultrasound training and practise of confidential and participation was they wanted to refer a patient. Prac- general practitioners in the Free State voluntary. titioners referred their patients for a private practice sector. second opinion to the following: gen- Results eral practitioner (3, 6.4%), gynaecol- Methods Four hundred and eighty-one ogist (35, 74.5%), and radiologist This was a descriptive study. Ques- questionnaires were sent to general (26, 55.3%). tionnaires were mailed to general practitioners and 229 (47.6%) were The practitioners’ awareness of practitioners in the private practice returned. Of these, 53 practitioners the South African Society for Ultra- sector of the Free State. The were not in private practice (despite sound in Obstetrics and Gynae- questionnaire included demographic the careful checking of name lists). cology (SASUOG) (40.4%) and information about the practitioner, Forty-seven (26.7%) of the 176 participation in SASUOG workshops the ultrasound profile of the practice, responding doctors in private prac- and/or courses (10.6%) are given in and the type of machine used. The tice used ultrasound. Table I. The type of training received questionnaire and accompanying The following results only include by practitioners using ultrasound is letter were available in English and the practitioners who answered the given in Table II. More than a third Afrikaans. questionnaire and used ultrasound. (18, 38.3%) had no training. Names and addresses of practi- The practitioners’ ages ranged from The majority of general practi- tioners were obtained from the Health 29 to 82 years (median 40 years), tioners (44, 93.6%) had one ultra- Professions Council. Many practi- six (12.8%) were female and 41 sound machine and three (6.4%) tioners listed were not, however, (87.2%) were male. had two machines. Forty-two per- working in the private sector. Thus, Approximately half of the practi- cent of the machines were bought the names on the list were compared tioners (26, 55.3%) had only one more than five years before the sur- to those on a list obtained from a qualification (MBChB), 16 (34.0%) vey was done, and one machine medical representative from a had two qualifications and five was 16 years old. The age of the pharmaceutical company that (10.6%) had three qualifications. machine plays a definite role in the serves the Free State, a list from Only eight (18.6%) practitioners had quality of the ultrasound investiga- Oranjemed (Independent Practice Table I: General practitioners’ awareness of SASUOG (n = 47 practitioners) Organisation of the Free State), and the telephone directory of the Free Frequency Percentage State. Practitioners not in the private Aware of Society 19 40.4% sector (medical officers and doctors Member of Society 5 10.6% who were specialising, retired, or SASUOG course participation 5 10.6% 26 SA Fam Pract 2004;46(6) Original Research Table II: Type of ultrasound training (n = 47 practitioners) Number of practitioners Percentage Short courses 19 40.4% Practical courses 7 14.9% Self-study 3 6.4% In-service training 1 2.1% No training 18 38.3% Table III: Type of ultrasound transducer (n = 46 machines) Head type Number Percentage Sector 15 30% Curvilinear 23 46% Sector and Linear 1 2% Curvilinear and Vaginal 5 10% Curvilinear and Sector 1 2% Curvilinear, Sector and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Looking at the Unborn: Hi S to R I Ca L As P E C T S of Ob S T E T R I C Ult R a S O U N D
    Wellcome Witnesses to Twentieth Century Medicine LOOKING AT THE UNBORN: HI S TO R I CA L AS P E C T S OF OB S T E T R I C ULT R A S O U N D Volume 5 – January 2000 A Witness Seminar held at the Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, London, on 10 March 1998 Witness Seminar Transcript edited by E M Tansey and D A Christie ©The Trustee of the Wellcome Trust, London, 2000 First published by the Wellcome Trust, 2000 The Wellcome Trust is a registered charity, no. 210183. ISBN 978 184129 011 9 All volumes are freely available online at: www.history.qmul.ac.uk/research/modbiomed/wellcome_witnesses/ Please cite as: Tansey E M, Christie D A. (eds) (2000) Looking at the Unborn: Historical aspects of obstetric ultrasound. Wellcome Witnesses to Twentieth Century Medicine, vol. 5. London: Wellcome Trust. Key Front cover photographs, L to R from the top: Dr Tony Whittingham Mr Usama Abdulla, Mr Thomas Brown, Mr Demetrios Economides Professor Charles Whitfield, Dr Margaret McNay Dr James Willocks, Mrs Lois Reynolds Dr Marcolm Nicolson, Professor Norman McDicken Mr John Fleming, Dr Angus Hall (chair) Mr Thomas Brown, Dr Tony Whittingham Mr Usama Abdulla, Professor Peter Wells Back cover photographs, L to R from the top: Mr Thomas Brown Audience Dr Malcolm Nicolson, Dr Angus Hall (chair) : Professor Norman McDicken, Mrs Alix Donald Dr Norman Slark Professor John MacVicar Dr Angus Hall (chair) CONTENTS Introduction E M Tansey i Transcript 1 List of plates Figure 1. Ian Donald. 6 Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership of Ian Donald School
    LEADERSHIP OF IAN DONALD SCHOOL DIRECTORS, REGIONAL DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE BOARD, ADVISORY BOARD NATIONAL BRANCHES AND DIRECTORS 1 IAN DONALD SCHOOL OFFICERS DIRECTORS, REGIONAL DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE BOARD, ADVISORY BOARD Founder and Director Asim Kurjak Croatia [email protected] Vice-Director Ivica Zalud USA [email protected] Co-Directors Frank A. Chervenak USA [email protected] Eberhard Merz Germany [email protected] Executive Director Milan Stanojevic Croatia [email protected] Regional Directors Jaideep Malhotra (Indian subcontinent) India [email protected] Toshiyuki Hata (Asia and Oceania) Japan [email protected] Giovanni Monni (Europe) Italy [email protected] Ana Bianchi (Latin America) Uruguay [email protected] Abdallah Adra (Arabic World) Lebanon [email protected] Syed Amir Gilani (Central Asia) Pakistan [email protected] Miroslaw Wielgos (Eastern Europe) Poland [email protected] Executive Board Sanja Kupesic Plavsic USA [email protected] Ritsuko K. Pooh Japan [email protected] Panagiotis Antsaklis Greece [email protected] Waldo Sepulveda Chile [email protected] Tuangsit Wataganara Thailand [email protected] Sonal Panchal India [email protected] Advisory Board Giampaolo Mandruzzato Italy [email protected] Jose Maria Carrera Spain [email protected] Joachim Dudenhausen Germany [email protected] Kazuo Maeda Japan [email protected] 2 Director of Ian Donald School specialist fellowship programs
    [Show full text]
  • Final Obster Paper 2008.P65
    J Obstet Gynecol India Vol. 58, No. 6 : November/December 2008 pg 482-483 Milestones Ian Donald : the pioneer of ultrasound in medicine Dastur Adi E 1, Tank PD 2 Honorary Professor Emeritus, Seth G S Medical College & Dean, Nowrosjee Wadia Maternity Hospital, Mumbai, India 1 Honorary Clinical Associate, Nowrosjee Wadia Maternity Hospital, Mumbai, India 2 Obstetric ultrasound is a multidisciplinary subject. This the 1940s, work was being done in applying the principles is its strength and its weakness. The contribution of of sonar detection to medical sciences in Austria by radiologists and radiographers, obstetricians, Karl Dussik, Japan by Tanaka and Wagai and in the neonatologists, pediatricians, geneticists, physicists and United States by Wild and Howry. The clinical scientists have expressed their skills in the development application of their techniques was limited by and made this a rich and exciting subject. Indeed, the impracticalities and very poor image production. In this one who can lead such a team of highly skilled, disparate background emerged Ian Donald, who in later years, professionals, would be a giant in the field. Professor came to be known as the founder father of ultrasound in Ian Donald was such a persona. obstetrics, gynecology and much of clinical medicine. It was his vision, persistence and eloquent advocacy that The history of ultrasound is quite short. The first brought ultrasound to the important place it occupies in practical application of ultrasound was the effort of the diagnostic armamentarium. French physicist Paul Langevin, to detect submarines during the First World War. Results were not achieved Ian Donald (Figure 1) was born in Cornwall, UK in 1910, in time for the war but his work formed the basis of the son and grandson of Scottish doctors.
    [Show full text]
  • History of The
    HISTORY OF THE AMERICAN GYNECOLOGICAL SOCIETY 1876-1981 AND AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS 1888-1981 EDWARD STEWART TAYLOR Denver, Colorado The C. V. Mosby Company ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI 1985 Copyright © 1985 by The C. V. Mosby Company All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or trans- mitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America The C. V. Mosby Company 11830 Westline Industrial Drive, St. Louis, Missouri 63146 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Taylor, E. Stewart (Edward Stewart), 1911- History of the American Gynecological Society, 1876- 1981, and the American Associate of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1888-1981. Includes index. 1. American Gynecological Society—History. 2. American Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists—History. I. American Gynecological Society. II. American Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. III. Title. [DNLM: Gynecology—history—United States. 2. Obstetrics— history—United States. 3. Societies, Medical—history— United States, WP 1 A512T] RG1.A567T39 1985 618'.06’073 85-4768 ISBN 0-8016-5101-8 GW/OB/RR 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 01/C/088 Contents Preface. ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction. ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Looking at the Unborn Christie, DA; Tansey, EM
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Queen Mary Research Online Looking at the unborn Christie, DA; Tansey, EM For additional information about this publication click this link. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/2799 Information about this research object was correct at the time of download; we occasionally make corrections to records, please therefore check the published record when citing. For more information contact [email protected] Wellcome Witnesses to Twentieth Century Medicine LOOKING AT THE UNBORN: HI S TO R I CA L AS P E C T S OF OB S T E T R I C ULT R A S O U N D Volume 5 – January 2000 A Witness Seminar held at the Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, London, on 10 March 1998 Witness Seminar Transcript edited by E M Tansey and D A Christie ©The Trustee of the Wellcome Trust, London, 2000 First published by the Wellcome Trust, 2000 The Wellcome Trust is a registered charity, no. 210183. ISBN 978 184129 011 9 All volumes are freely available online at: www.history.qmul.ac.uk/research/modbiomed/wellcome_witnesses/ Please cite as: Tansey E M, Christie D A. (eds) (2000) Looking at the Unborn: Historical aspects of obstetric ultrasound. Wellcome Witnesses to Twentieth Century Medicine, vol. 5. London: Wellcome Trust. Key Front cover photographs, L to R from the top: Dr Tony Whittingham Mr Usama Abdulla, Mr Thomas Brown, Mr Demetrios Economides Professor Charles Whitfield, Dr Margaret McNay Dr James Willocks, Mrs Lois Reynolds Dr Marcolm Nicolson, Professor Norman McDicken Mr John Fleming, Dr Angus Hall (chair) Mr Thomas Brown, Dr Tony Whittingham Mr Usama Abdulla, Professor Peter Wells Back cover photographs, L to R from the top: Mr Thomas Brown Audience Dr Malcolm Nicolson, Dr Angus Hall (chair) : Professor Norman McDicken, Mrs Alix Donald Dr Norman Slark Professor John MacVicar Dr Angus Hall (chair) CONTENTS Introduction E M Tansey i Transcript 1 List of plates Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Misc 198978.Pdf
    Frank A. Chervenak, MD Frank A. Chervenak, MD currently serves as Chair of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lenox Hill Hospital; Chair of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Associate Dean of International Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell. He received his Bachelor of Science degree from Pennsylvania State University with highest distinction, and his medical degree from Thomas Jefferson University where he was elected a member of Alpha Omega Alpha Medical Honor Society. Dr. Chervenak served his internship in Internal Medicine at New York Medical College, residency in Obstetrics and Gynecology at New York Medical College in St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital Center, and a fellowship in Maternal Fetal Medicine at Yale University School of Medicine. He was Assistant Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Mt. Sinai Medical Center, where he was also Director of Perinatal Research and received the Dr. Solomon Silver Award for application of advances in research to the practice of Clinical Medicine. He had served as the Given Foundation Professor and Chairman of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, as well as Obstetrician and Gynecologist-in-Chief and the Director of Maternal Fetal Medicine at the New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Medical College of Cornell University from 1999 to 2018. Dr. Chervenak was appointed Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Director of Obstetric Ultrasound and Ethics at New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center in 1987. In 1991 he was named Director of Maternal Fetal Medicine and Director of Obstetrics. In 1992 he was made Full Professor with tenure, in 1998 he was named Vice Chairman of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and in 1999 was named Acting Chairman of that department.
    [Show full text]
  • Ian Donald (1910–1987) [1]
    Published on The Embryo Project Encyclopedia (https://embryo.asu.edu) Ian Donald (1910–1987) [1] By: Erjavic, Nicole Keywords: Neonatal Medicine [2] Ian Donald [3] was an obstetrician who developed ultrasound [4] diagnostics during the twentieth century in Europe. Ultrasound is a medical diagnostic technique that uses sound waves to produce images of the inside of the body. During the early 1900s, physicians had no way to see inside a woman’s uterus [5] during pregnancy [6]. Donald developed the first method of scanning human internal anatomy in real time, which enabled doctors to diagnose potentially fatal tumors and cysts. Donald’s development of ultrasound [4] imaging enabled doctors and midwives to more accurately track fetal development and prevent potential health problems. Donald was born on 27 December 1910 in Cornwall, England, to Helen Wilson and John Donald. His mother was a concert pianist, and his father was a medical doctor. Donald was the eldest of four children, with younger siblings Margaret, Alison, and Malcolm. While Donald grew up in rural England, his father emphasized the importance of a broad education, including conversing in French at the dinner table and memorizing the works of Shakespeare. Donald began his formal education at Warriston Preparatory School in Moffat, Scotland, and continued his secondary education at Fettes College in Edinburgh, Scotland. In 1925, at the age of fourteen, Donald moved with his family to Cape Town, South Africa. He attended Diocesan College in Cape Town, where he studied Greco-Roman literature, music, philosophy, and language. Two years later, Donald, two of his siblings, and their mother contracted diphtheria.
    [Show full text]
  • Forty Years of Obstetric Ultrasound 1957-1997
    Ultrasound in Med. & Biol., Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 3–56, 1999 Copyright © 0 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology Printed in the USA. All rights reserved 0301-5629/99/$–see front matter PII S0301-5629(98)00129-X c Historical Review FORTY YEARS OF OBSTETRIC ULTRASOUND 1957–1997: FROM A-SCOPE TO THREE DIMENSIONS † MARGARET B. MCNAY* and JOHN E. E. FLEMING *Yorkhill NHS Trust and †Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK (Received 7 July 1998; in final form 14 July 1998) Fig. 1. (a) An A-scan trace of fetal biparietal diameter. (Courtesy of Dr. J. Willocks.) (b) Three-dimensional image of a fetal head, taken in 1998. (Courtesy of Sonotron Ltd.) “For thee....to whom No sound is dissonant which tells of Life” —Coleridge Abstract—In this article, we record the history of obstetric ultrasound as it developed worldwide in the second half of the twentieth century. The technological advances during this period saw the evolution of equipment from the original adapted metal flaw detectors producing a simple A-scan to the modern, purpose built, real-time colour flow machines with three-dimensional capability (Fig. 1). Clinically, ultrasound began as a research tool, but the poor quality of the images led to the ridicule of many of the early investigators. However, because of their perseverance, ultrasound developed into an imaging modality providing immense diagnostic capabilities and facilitating with precision many invasive procedures, diagnostic and therapeutic, both of which have made significant contributions to patient care. In this history, we recall the people, the personalities, and the problems they encountered during the development of ultrasound and how these problems were resolved, so that 3 4 Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Volume 25, Number 1, 1999 ultrasound now is available for use in the care of pregnant women throughout the developed world.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Cv Here
    CURRICULUM VITAE PERSONAL DETAILS Name: Edin Međedović Title: MD, Gynecologist-obstetrician, Master of Ultrasound in Gyn/Ob Date/place of birth: September 4th 1974, Novi Pazar, Serbia Foreign languages: English E-mail: [email protected] ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2357-9580 Telephone: +387 62 340 044 Current employment: physician, a specialist in gynecology and obstetrics - Clinical Center of the University of Sarajevo (KCUS), Obstetrics Clinic; assistant - subject "Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine", School of Medicine, Sarajevo School of Science and Technology, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina EDUCATION AND QUALIFICATIONS 2006 graduated from the Medical Faculty in Belgrade 2006 participated as a researcher in an international multicenter study (CIBIS-ELD study) under the auspices of the Charité Clinic in Berlin, which dealt with the use of beta-blockers in elderly patients with heart failure 2007-2012 residency in Gynecology and Obstetrics at the Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo 2009 postgraduate studies at the Faculty of Medicine in Sarajevo 2010 education in the field of ultrasound diagnostics in gynecology and obstetrics at the Sveti Duh Clinical Hospital in Zagreb under the patronage of professor Asim Kurjak MD; completed training in the field of fetal echocardiography at the University Hospital Rebro in Zagreb, under the supervision of the doyen professor Ivan Malcic MD 2012 passed the specialist exam in Gynecology and Obstetrics; education in the field of
    [Show full text]
  • 1. a Short History of the Developments of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
    1. A SHORT HISTORY OF THE DEVELOPMENTS OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY Dr. Joseph Woo The term SONAR refers to Sound Navigation and Ranging. As early as 1822, Daniel Colladen, a Swiss physicist, had used an underwater bell in an attempt to calculate the speed of sound in the waters of Lake Geneva. Other early attempts at mapping the ocean-floor basing on simple echo-sounding methods were nevertheless unrewarding. Lord Rayleigh in England published in 1877 the famous treatise "The Theory of Sound" in which the fundamental physics of sound vibrations (waves), transmission and refraction were clearly delineated. The breakthrough in echo-sounding techniques came when the piezoelectric effect in certain crystals was discovered by Pierre Curie and his brother Jacques Curie in France in 1880. They observed that an electric potential would be produced when mechanical pressure was exerted on a quartz crystal such as the Rochelle salt (sodium potassium tartrate tetrahydrate) and conversely, the application of an electric charge would produce deformation in the crystal and causing it to vibrate. It was then possible for the generation and reception of 'ultra'-sounds that are in the frequency range of millions of cycles per second (megahertz) which could be employed in echo sounding devices. Underwater detection systems were developed after the Titanic sank in 1912 and for the purpose of underwater navigation by submarines in World war I. The first patent for an under-water echo ranging sonar was filed at the British Patent Office by LF Richardson, one month after the sinking of the Titanic. The first working sonar system was designed and built in the United States by Canadian Reginald A Fessenden in 1914.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking at the Unborn: Hi S to R I Ca L As P E C T S of Ob S T E T R I C Ult R a S O U N D
    Wellcome Witnesses to Twentieth Century Medicine LOOKING AT THE UNBORN: HI S TO R I CA L AS P E C T S OF OB S T E T R I C ULT R A S O U N D Volume 5 – January 2000 A Witness Seminar held at the Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, London, on 10 March 1998 Witness Seminar Transcript edited by E M Tansey and D A Christie CONTENTS Introduction E M Tansey i Transcript 1 List of plates Figure 1. Ian Donald. 6 Figure 2. Henry Hughes ‘Mark IIB’ Supersonic Flaw Detector. 7 Figure 3. A Kelvin & Hughes Mark IV flaw detector. 8 Figure 4. An A-scan from about 1956, showing the presence of a large simple ovarian cyst. 8 Figure 5. Image from the first contact B-scanner, a large simple ovarian cyst. 9 Figure 6. Tom Brown, standing in front of the newly built contact scanner, c. 1957. 9 Figure 7. The first contact scanner in clinical use in the Western Infirmary. 12 Figure 8. The first automatic scanner, designed by Tom Brown. 12 Figure 9. Dugald Cameron’s sketch ideas on an original proposal for the Lund machine. 24 Figure 10. The re-designed Lund machine as it was actually built and delivered. Drawing by Dugald Cameron. 24 Figure 11. The Lund machine. 25 Figure 12. A newly assembled Diasonograph shown at Smiths (Kelvin & Hughes Ltd) Hillington works, Glasgow. 25 Figure 13. The Diasonograph showing the electronics console and mechanical assembly. 26 Figure 14. Control panel of the Diasonograph.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DIASONOGRAPH STORY Tony Whittingham
    MEDICAL PHYSICS INTERNATIONAL Journal, Special Issue, History of Medical Physics 6, 2021 THE DIASONOGRAPH STORY Tony Whittingham Formerly Regional Medical Physics Department, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Trust, UK and Newcastle University I. BACKGROUND. Up to the time when Ian Donald started to experiment with ultrasound in Glasgow there had already been many significant developments in diagnostic applications of ultrasound around the world. A number of researchers had managed to acquire industrial flaw detectors and publish the results of their A-mode investigations of tissues. In 1949, R P McLaughlin and G N Guastavino at the Argentinian laboratory of the American electronics company RCA, published a paper describing their own pulse echo instrument for detecting foreign objects in tissue, including the example of a stone embedded in an excised kidney [1]. In the same year, George Ludwig, a medical officer, and Francis Struthers, a physicist, both at the Naval Medical Research Institute in Bethseda, Maryland, measured the acoustic properties of a range of tissues and demonstrated gallstones implanted in dogs [2]. Also in 1949, John Wild, an English surgeon working at the University of Minnesota in the USA, measured changes in bowel wall thickness [3]. In 1953, cardiologist Inge Edler and physicist Hellmuth Hertz, in Lund, Sweden, experimented with an industrial flaw detector, borrowed from a shipyard, and interpreted moving echoes from within the heart. By 1954, they had invented the M-mode technique for recording and measuring echo movements and had published M-mode echo recordings of the hearts of living patients, establishing what was to become the diagnostic technique of echocardiography [4].
    [Show full text]