DOCSLIB.ORG

An Autobiographical Essay

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

[CANCER RESEARCH 34, 3159—3164, December 1974J An Autobiographical Essay Alexander Haddow The Lodge, Pollards Wood, Chalfont St. Giles, Buckinghamshire, England “At'slongavita brevis, “—Hippocrates,Seneca was forced to confess it. Although it was late, my mother immediately sent for Dr. Scott who promptly diagnosed a Happy is the man whose occupation and career are decided perforated appendix and arranged for me to be taken to and determined in early life, and I have every reason for Edinburgh for surgery. I was taken to be operated on by the thankfulness in this regard. surgeon to a well-known nursing home (1 7 Ainslie Place) I was brought up in Broxburn, West Lothian, Scotland, and which, as I well knew, was far beyond my father's means. it may be of interest to record the beginnings of my attraction Thereafter, this being long before the advent of penicillin, I lay to biology and medicine, and especially to cancer research, in bed for a matter of some 6 weeks, and one of my main which began at a tender age in my career. recollections (before the use of the drip) was in the first few Broxburn is a small town lying about 10 miles west of days the torture of an almost intolerable thirst. Edinburgh, and in the course of a very happy childhood I was With this over, I had the marvelous opportunity to witness greatly influenced by the works of the great surgeon, Sir the daily visits of many great Edinburgh surgeons of the time, Frederick Treves, and by reading the life of the famous Sir several of whom I came to know in my student days. These James Young Simpson who was the first to apply the use of included the great Sir John Fraser and Mr. Quarrie Wood upon chloroform in surgery and obstetrics. Another telling factor whom, with others, the fame of the Edinburgh Medical School lay in the circumstance that our family doctor was the rested. On attaining full recovery I was discharged, although well-known Dr. Alexander Scott who, because of his striking from the remarks of friends and neighbors in Broxburn I must appearance and skill, became in my mind the absolute hero have remained rather pale and thin. Thereafter, I remember (7). Broxburn lies in the center of the Scottish shale field, and my mother took me for a short holiday to the lovely county in the course of his practice Dr. Scott carried out an excellent of Peeblesshire and to individual places such as West Linton, survey of the natural history of cancer of the skin and Romanno Bridge, and Lamancha, where I explored the especially cancer of the scrotum, which in those early days surrounding moors and made a list of no fewer than 72 bird was a formidable occupational disease among the workers species including the curlew, partridge, fieldiark, corncrake, engaged on the retorts and presses of the industry (8, 9) but kestrel, hawk, and plover. which has now been largely abolished following the institution On resuming school, while I must have been distinctly of pithead baths. Hence, early in life my motives were directed priggish and introverted, I can recall the actual day when it not merely to medicine and biology but also to cancer seemed to me I must be doing rather well in my class. Our research. At that time (1915 to 1918), public health and headmaster was Mr. William Brown, whom we nicknamed hygiene were far from being fully developed. For example, the “Squeak―becauseof the high pitch of his voice . Although town contained several open middens which every spring and Broxburn High School was merely a village seminary, we summer led to a great plague of the common housefly and to enjoyed a wonderful education and I can never pay tribute the appearance in every home of adhesive flypapers to counter enough to the band of teachers for their devotion and skill, the menace. One of the results was the annual occurrence of even though they worked in obscurity and on what must have a particularly virulent form of scarlatina. Like many others, I been, in those times, a very low salary. Mr. Brown and I contracted this disease (at about the age of 10) and have never, became great friends, and at the weekends he would often take before or since, felt so ill. I was removed for some weeks to an me on long country walks to find, examine, and identify the infectious diseases hospital where I learned, even in those flora of the district, on which he was a great authority. I have preantibiotic days, what a wonderful life and prospect lay in never known a man to handle a book with such loving care, the study and application of medicine. These feelings and and on our return from such rambles he would go through his ambitions were enhanced soon afterwards. library, which contained many volumes, to read of some One day, other schoolfellows and I were invited by the local species ofwhich we had not been sure. squire, Lord Cardross, to spend our time in dragging timber at At that time most of the boys leaving school at 12 (I myself his wonderful house, Almondell House, lying some miles away. stayed later) used to enter the mines as a matter of course. Early that day I was stricken with intense abdominal pain and However, I asked my father if I might enter medicine in general illness. How I got through the day I shall never know, Edinburgh and to my great relief he assented. I also remember but I eventually returned home with the others. The pain was asking him if I might enter for an award from the Carnegie so intense and the discomfort so great that I knew something Trust for the Universities of Scotland in Dunfermline. The must be seriously wrong. I had developed the art of concealing Trust expected such awards to be paid back in later life and ailments from my dear father and mother, but this particular this I would gladly have done, but I recall my admiration for illness proved too much, and on being put to bed that night I my father when he indicated that we could probably just DECEMBER 1974 3159 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 25, 2021. © 1974 American Association for Cancer Research. A. Haddow manage and that he did not feel he should make use of this demoralizing appearance with his black skull cap. Every 3 proposal. At the present time, most universities and medical months, each one of us had to present ourselves before him for schools have infmitely more applicants than they can examination in what was then called the Quarterly. I accommodate, but in 1924 things were much easier, and as I remember my first part was head and neck. I am afraid I did held the required Higher Grade Certificates I simply notified not know it at all well, and when I went up I performed the Dean's Office in Medicine (by postcard) that I would be miserably. At the end of this ordeal, Jamieson said, “Haddow, starting in October of that year. Then there began what were profoundly unsatisfactory—46%.― In part this awful experi possibly the happiest years of my life in “mineownromantic ence depressed me but it also galvanized me into real effort in town.―Even then, Edinburgh stifi revered the names of Lister, the following term. My part was then abdomen, and when I Liston, and Syme and their contributions to its surgical fame. went for the viva I felt full of knowledge and confidence. I was One of the great disadvantages of old Edinburgh was that we not surprised to fmd myself doing exceptionally well. At the lived not in community life but in digs mainly in Marchmont end, the same old Jamie reported to me, “Haddow, across the Meadows. This I did, going home each weekend. profoundly more satisfactory—92%.― I stifi retain most vivid memories of my first day in the New Although he did not know it, part of this satisfaction was Quadrangle of the Medical School, with its Florentine-based due to my attendance at an extramural course which was run architecture, and of signing the Sponsio Academica. Our first at the Surgeons' Hall by Professor (or as we called him, lecture was in anatomy from Professor Arthur Robinson “Daddy―)Whitaker.This was really a cramming course mainly (1862—1948), a great anatomist and embryologist whose run for poor fellows from Cambridge who had come down in knowledge was matched by his amazing modesty. On this first their examinations and who wished to get through next time. morning of our medical life he appeared at the appointed It consisted of mnemonics and rhymes and Daddy Whitaker hour—I think 9 a.m.—blushed rather shyly and simply said, beat out his instructions, with the aid of an old femur bone, to “Thisisyour first day in medicine. If in later life you don't the strains of the parietals in blue, the frontals in red, leading succeed, please don't blame anyone except yourself.―Then he in a great crescendo to “thesphenoids in faded heliotrope―; plunged into his subject and kept our noses to the grindstone but it certainly did the trick. A failure of mine, no doubt due for 2 further years. Of course the change was great, and to temperament, was my wish to do the things that appealed anatomy did not at that time appeal to me since it appeared to to me and to defer until the last moment those things that did be too mechanical a subject.
Recommended publications
  • History of the Chair of Clinical Surgery

    History of the Chair of Clinical Surgery

    History of the Chair of Clinical Surgery Eleven people have held the Chair of Clinical Surgery since its establishment in 1802. They are, in chronological order: • Professor James Russell • Professor James Syme • Lord Joseph Lister • Professor Thomas Annandale • Professor Francis Mitchell Caird • Sir Harold Stiles • Sir John Fraser • Sir James Learmonth • Sir John Bruce • Sir Patrick Forrest • Sir David Carter Introduction At the end of the 18th century surgeons had been advocating that the teaching of surgery in the University of Edinburgh was of sufficient importance to justify a chair in its own right. Resistance to this development was largely directed by Munro Secundus, who regarded this potentially as an infringement on his right to teach anatomy and surgery. James Russell petitioned the town council to establish a Chair of Clinical Surgery and, in 1802, he was appointed as the first Professor of Clinical Surgery. The chair was funded by a Crown endowment of £50 a year from George III in 1803. James Russell 1754-1836 James Russell followed his father of the same name into the surgical profession. His father had served as deacon of the Incorporation of Surgeons (Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh) in 1752.The younger James Russell was admitted into the Incorporation in 1774, the year before it became the Royal College of Surgeons of the City of Edinburgh. Prior to his appointment to the Regius Chair of Clinical Surgery, Russell was seen as a popular teacher attracting large classes in the extramural school. Though he was required by the regulations of the time to retire from practice at the Royal Infirmary at the age of 50, he continued to lecture and undertake tutorials in clinical surgery over the next 20 years.
  • Former Fellows Biographical Index Part

    Former Fellows Biographical Index Part

    Former Fellows of The Royal Society of Edinburgh 1783 – 2002 Biographical Index Part Two ISBN 0 902198 84 X Published July 2006 © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 22-26 George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 2PQ BIOGRAPHICAL INDEX OF FORMER FELLOWS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH 1783 – 2002 PART II K-Z C D Waterston and A Macmillan Shearer This is a print-out of the biographical index of over 4000 former Fellows of the Royal Society of Edinburgh as held on the Society’s computer system in October 2005. It lists former Fellows from the foundation of the Society in 1783 to October 2002. Most are deceased Fellows up to and including the list given in the RSE Directory 2003 (Session 2002-3) but some former Fellows who left the Society by resignation or were removed from the roll are still living. HISTORY OF THE PROJECT Information on the Fellowship has been kept by the Society in many ways – unpublished sources include Council and Committee Minutes, Card Indices, and correspondence; published sources such as Transactions, Proceedings, Year Books, Billets, Candidates Lists, etc. All have been examined by the compilers, who have found the Minutes, particularly Committee Minutes, to be of variable quality, and it is to be regretted that the Society’s holdings of published billets and candidates lists are incomplete. The late Professor Neil Campbell prepared from these sources a loose-leaf list of some 1500 Ordinary Fellows elected during the Society’s first hundred years. He listed name and forenames, title where applicable and national honours, profession or discipline, position held, some information on membership of the other societies, dates of birth, election to the Society and death or resignation from the Society and reference to a printed biography.

  • 126613790.23.Pdf

    I C,cs. sw^.6^ PUBLICATIONS OF THE SCOTTISH HISTORY SOCIETY THIRD SERIES VOLUME V PAPERS FROM THE COLLECTION OF SIR WILLIAM FRASER, K.C.B., LL.D. January 1924 This Volume is presented to the Members of the Scottish History Society of the year 1922-23 by the Trustees of the late Sir William Fraser, K.C.B., LL.D., in exercise of the authority which he conferred upon them to publish or print, for private circulation or otherwise, such documents as they might think proper, with the special object of illustrating the History and Antiquities of Scotland. January 1924. (Xvf&Mejm. WILLIAM FRASER, K.C.B., LL.D. at PAPERS FROM Tin < -H I ECTION OF SIR WH M FRASER . ■ ?' : ' n i - f \it, K,C. EDINBURGH Printed at the University Press by T. and A. Constahik I/n-, for the Scottish History Society 1924 PAPERS FROM THE COLLECTION OF SIR WILLIAM FRASER K.C.B., LL.D. Edited by J. R. N. MACPHAIL, K.C. EDINBURGH Printed at the University Press by T. and A. Constable Ltd. for the Scottish History Society 1924 Printed in Great Britain CONTENTS INTRODUCTION, ...... vii PAPERS RELATING TO SIMON LORD LOVAT— Introductory Note, . .2 A Short Account of the Process and Trial at the instance of His Majesty’s Advocat, by Special Order of His Majesty’s Privy Council, against Thomas Fraser of Beaufort and Capt. Simon Fraser his Son, and their Complices, for the crimes of treason. and other crimes, contained in their Indytment, . 6 Relative Documents, . .38 PAPERS RELATING TO THE MEARNS— Introductory Note, .
  • ASGBI Past Presidents

    ASGBI Past Presidents

    ASGBI Past Presidents Past President Annual Meeting 2018 Professor Rowan Parks Liverpool 2017 Professor Rowan Parks Glasgow 2016 Mr John Moorehead Belfast 2015 Mr John Moorehead Manchester 2014 Professor John Primrose Harrogate 2013 Professor John Primrose Glasgow 2012 Professor John MacFie Liverpool 2011 Professor John MacFie Bournemouth 2010 Professor Mike Horrocks Liverpool 2009 Professor Mike Horrocks Glasgow 2008 Professor Brian Rowlands Bournemouth 2007 Professor Brian Rowlands Manchester 2006 Mr Denis C Wilkins Edinburgh 2005 Mr R H S Lane Glasgow 2004 Mr T Bates Harrogate 2003 Mr R W G Johnson Manchester 2002 Mr R C G Russell Dublin 2001 Mr D F L Watkin Birmingham 2000 Lord B F Ribeiro, CBE Cardiff 1999 Professor R C N Williamson Brighton 1998 Mr A E B Giddings Edinburgh 1997 Professor Sir David Carter Bournemouth 1996 Professor Sir Miles Irving Glasgow 1995 Sir Barry Jackson London 1994 Professor A G Johnson Harrogate 1993 Professor Averil Mansfield, CBE Birmingham 1992 Professor T G Parks Jersey 1991 Mr M J Gough Oxford 1990 Professor Sir Herbert Duthie Cardiff 1989 Professor Sir Patrick Forrest Edinburgh 1988 Mr N V Addison Harrogate 1987 Professor Sir Robert Shields Liverpool 1986 Mr A Marston London 1985 Professor P G Bevan, CBE Birmingham 1984 Mr W F Walker Dundee 1983 Mr H H G Eastcott London 1982 Mr A R Anscombe Manchester 1981 Mr T Kennedy Belfast 1980 Professor G W Taylor Bournemouth 1979 Mr A B Birt, CBE Norwich 1978 Mr D H Randall Sheffield 1977 Mr G Blackburn, MBE London 1976 Mr A Innes, MBE Birmingham 1975 Mr J S H Wade, MC, TD Cardiff 1974 Mr R S Handley, OBE London 1973 Mr W Michie, MBE Aberdeen 1972 Professor J C Goligher Harrogate/Leeds 1971 Professor Sir Hedley Atkins, KBE London 1970 Professor W A Mackey Glasgow 1969 Mr A S Till Oxford 1968 Sir Clifford Naunton Morgan London 1967 Professor P Fitzgerald Dublin 1966 Professor Sir John Bruce, CBE, TD Edinburgh 1965 Sir Ralph Marnham, KCVO London 1964 Professor Sir Donald Douglas, MBE St.
  • From Left to Right, Captains John Fraser and A. N. Hooper, Royal Army Medical Corps, and Captain Walter B. Cannon, U.S. Army

    From Left to Right, Captains John Fraser and A. N. Hooper, Royal Army Medical Corps, and Captain Walter B. Cannon, U.S. Army

    .1-00 .i., ik "N --'. ... ..l j From left to right, Captains John Fraser and A. N. Hooper, Royal Army Medical Corps, and Captain Walter B. Cannon, U.S. Army Medical Service, at Casualty Clearing Station No. 33, Bethune, October 1917. (From the Cannon Papers, Countway Library of Medicine, Boston.) Medical History, 1991, 35: 217-249. WALTER B. CANNON AND THE MYSTERY OF SHOCK: A STUDY OF ANGLO-AMERICAN CO-OPERATION IN WORLD WAR I by SAUL BENISON, A. CLIFFORD BARGER, and ELIN L. WOLFE * The hospital is on a gentle slope, whence one can see far out along the avenue down which we have come. It is all gay and golden. The earth lies there, still and smooth and secure; even fields are to be seen, little, brown, tilled strips, right close by the hospital. And when the wind blows away the stench ofblood and ofgangrene, one can smell the pungent ploughed earth. The distance is blue and everywhere peaceful, for from here the view is away from the Front. -Erich Maria Remarque, Prologue to Der Weg Zuruck (The Road Back), 1931 The autumn of 1914 marked the beginning of an extraordinary transformation of the plains of northern France and Flanders. Fields where farmers had for centuries ploughed with horses, laid down seed, and set out livestock to graze in an effort to sustain life, in a relatively briefperiod oftime became a maiming and killing ground for British, French and German armies. At first, combatants on both sides believed the conflict would be a short one, crowned by a quick victory.
  • Teaching and Research

    Teaching and Research

    Teaching and research The origins of surgical teaching and research, both of which are now located at the Little France site in Edinburgh. Medical School The Medical School was established at the University of Edinburgh in 1726. The surgeon John Munro had considerable influence in ensuring that, in 1720, his son Alexander Munro Primus was appointed to the Chair of Anatomy which had been established extramurally by the town council in 1705. Alexander Munro's biography The teaching of surgery took place as a part of the anatomy course established by Munro Primus and was continued by the succeeding Munros Secundus and Tertius. Although these anatomist leaders made significant contributions, university anatomy was increasingly seen as being inappropriate for training of practical surgery. In the late 18th century there was a growth for extramural teaching of the subject and much of this was delivered from the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh. The College established its own professorship in 1804 and provided teaching in surgery right up until the University of Edinburgh established a surgical chair (in systematic surgery) in 1831. Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh Whilst a considerable amount of teaching took place within the Royal College of Surgeons and the University of Edinburgh, the opportunities for undergraduate teaching and postgraduate training escalated with the establishment of the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, which opened in 1741 at its original site in Infirmary Street. The hospital was vacated in 1789 (and demolished five years later) with the opening of the hospital at its site in Lauriston Place. This site was the focus of surgical teaching until its closure in May 2003, with the transfer of all services to its site at Little France.
  • Former Fellows Biographical Index Part

    Former Fellows Biographical Index Part

    Former Fellows of The Royal Society of Edinburgh 1783 – 2002 Biographical Index Part One ISBN 0 902 198 84 X Published July 2006 © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 22-26 George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 2PQ BIOGRAPHICAL INDEX OF FORMER FELLOWS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH 1783 – 2002 PART I A-J C D Waterston and A Macmillan Shearer This is a print-out of the biographical index of over 4000 former Fellows of the Royal Society of Edinburgh as held on the Society’s computer system in October 2005. It lists former Fellows from the foundation of the Society in 1783 to October 2002. Most are deceased Fellows up to and including the list given in the RSE Directory 2003 (Session 2002-3) but some former Fellows who left the Society by resignation or were removed from the roll are still living. HISTORY OF THE PROJECT Information on the Fellowship has been kept by the Society in many ways – unpublished sources include Council and Committee Minutes, Card Indices, and correspondence; published sources such as Transactions, Proceedings, Year Books, Billets, Candidates Lists, etc. All have been examined by the compilers, who have found the Minutes, particularly Committee Minutes, to be of variable quality, and it is to be regretted that the Society’s holdings of published billets and candidates lists are incomplete. The late Professor Neil Campbell prepared from these sources a loose-leaf list of some 1500 Ordinary Fellows elected during the Society’s first hundred years. He listed name and forenames, title where applicable and national honours, profession or discipline, position held, some information on membership of the other societies, dates of birth, election to the Society and death or resignation from the Society and reference to a printed biography.
  • Sir John Bruce Frcsed

    Sir John Bruce Frcsed

    Sir John Bruce Reference and contact details: GB 779 RCSEd GD/17 Location: RS Q5 Title: Sir John Bruce Dates of Creation: Held at: The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh Extent: Name of Creator: Language of Material: English. Level of Description: Date(s) of Description: 1981; revised March 2009; listed 2018 Administrative/Biographical History: John Bruce (1905‐1975) was born in Dalkeith. He graduated at Edinburgh University with Honours in 1928. After appointments at Edinburgh Royal Infirmary and the Royal Hospital for Sick Children, he worked for a time as assistant in general practice at Grimsby. When he returned to Edinburgh he ran with Ian Aird (later Professor Aird) a course for the final Fellowship examinations ‘of such excellence that few candidates felt they could appear for the exam without having attended it’. On the 17th May 1932 he became a Fellow of this College. In World War II, he served with distinction in the Royal Army Medical Corps, first in Orkney and then in Norway. Later, he was Brigadier and Consulting Surgeon with the XIVth Army in India and Burma. In 1951, at the Western General Hospital, he and Wilfred Card set up what was probably the first gastro‐intestinal unit in which a physician and a surgeon were in joint charge. In 1956 he was appointed Regius Professor of Surgery at Edinburgh University. Sir John was a sound general surgeon with a particular interest in carcinoma of the breast and in gastro‐intestinal disease. He was a consummate surgical pathologist, wrote notable papers and contributed many chapters in various textbooks.
  • Book of the Quarter

    Book of the Quarter

    Proc. R. Coll. Physicians Edinb. 1998; 28: 119-124 Book of the Quarter NOTHING VENTURE NOTHING WIN Professor Sir Michael Woodruff, Scottish Academic Press, 1996, pp 234 I.F. MACLAREN,* 3 MINTO STREET, EDINBURGH EH9 1RG Over the past 200 years, the two senior professorial Chairs of Surgery in the University of Edinburgh have been occupied by a remarkable series of brilliant surgeons and inspiring teachers, some of whom have also been clinical scientists of the highest distinction, such as Charles Bell, James Syme, Joseph Lister, John Chiene, Alexis Thomson, Harold Stiles, David Wilkie and James Learmonth. For a ten-year period after World War II, the Chair of Systematic Surgery and the Regius Chair of Clinical Surgery were jointly held by Sir James Learmonth but, upon his retirement in 1956, the University decided to separate the two Chairs again and to redefine their academic roles. Prime responsibility for the organisation of undergraduate surgical teaching was transferred to the Regius Chair of Clinical Surgery, and the Chair of Systematic Surgery was reborn under the new designation of the Chair of Surgical Science with an implicit orientation mainly, but by no means entirely, towards research. In his autobiography, Sir Michael Woodruff, who was appointed to this Chair in 1957, tells us that at the time he considered its new title to be ill-chosen, and he records his satisfaction at its reversion to its original designation before his retirement. This is but one of many insights into his academic and scientific philosophy afforded to us by the author of this fascinating book: Sir Michael’s major contributions to biomedical science have enhanced the illustrious reputation of the Edinburgh School of Surgery and have entitled him to a fame equal to that of the most distinguished of his predecessors.
  • The ￢ﾀﾜice Age￢ﾀﾝ of Anatomy and Obstetrics: Hand and Eye in The

    The ￢ﾀﾜice Age￢ﾀﾝ of Anatomy and Obstetrics: Hand and Eye in The

    The “Ice Age” of Anatomy and Obstetrics: Hand and Eye in the Promotion of Frozen Sections around 1900 Salim Al-Gailani Bulletin of the History of Medicine, Volume 90, Number 4, Winter 2016, pp. 611-642 (Article) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/bhm.2016.0101 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/642727 Access provided by Cambridge University Library (1 Sep 2017 16:17 GMT) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The “Ice Age” of Anatomy and Obstetrics: Hand and Eye in the Promotion of Frozen Sections around 1900 SALIM AL-GAILANI summary: In the late nineteenth century anatomists claimed a new technique— slicing frozen corpses into sections—translated the three-dimensional complex- ity of the human body into flat, visually striking, and unprecedentedly accurate images. Traditionally hostile to visual aids, elite anatomists controversially claimed frozen sections had replaced dissection as the “true anatomy.” Some obstetricians adopted frozen sectioning to challenge anatomists’ authority and reform how cli- nicians made and used pictures. To explain the successes and failures of the tech- nique, this article reconstructs the debates through which practitioners learned to make and interpret, to promote or denigrate frozen sections in teaching and research. Focusing on Britain, the author shows that attempts to introduce frozen sectioning into anatomy and obstetrics shaped and were shaped by negotiations over the epistemological standing of hand and eye in medicine. keywords: frozen sections, anatomy, obstetrics, visual aids, representation In March 1870, anatomist Wilhelm Braune received at his Leipzig insti- tute the body of a young woman who had hanged herself in the final month of pregnancy.
  • Contents I on Which I Have Felt Moved to Write an 'Editorial'

    Contents I on Which I Have Felt Moved to Write an 'Editorial'

    u tin 73 Association of For information on advertising, membership and distribution: February Art Historians Andrew Falconer, 70 Cowcross Street, London EC1M 6EJ; 2000 Registered Charity No. 282S79 Tel: 020 7490 3211; Fax: 020 7490 3277; <[email protected]> Editor: Jannet King, 48 Stafford Road, Brighton BN1 5PF; <[email protected]> www.aah.org.uk New Look - New Input? n six years as Editor of Bulletin this is the first occasion Contents I on which I have felt moved to write an 'editorial'. I have hitherto adopted the role of facilitator, providing a means Benefits for members 2 by which AAH members can give voice to their opinions. It has gradually dawned on me, however, that maybe you all AGM Agenda 2 need a bit more encouragement in this regard! Launch of the Artists' Papers Register 3 Independents News 3 Gabriele Neher, the Associate Editor, and I felt that the Bulletin was in need of a revamp - both in terms of design Election of New Chair 3 and content. We hope you find the redesign both more AAH Annual Conference 4 visually arresting and easier to read and digest. Art Historians and Digital Images 13 While working on the redesign I leafed through back Students News 16 issues and realised that contributions from ordinary Annual reports 18 members have decreased substantially over the last few CIHA Conference 24 years, to the extent that the Bulletin has become primarily a vehicle for informing members about the actions of the Independents' Symposium 25 Executive Committee. While Bulletin will continue to feed Conference News 24 back to the membership the activities of the EC (see pages Executive Committee 28 18-23 for news of the various activities that have occupied the Executive in 1999), what Gabriele and I are really hoping for is to increase contributions from ordinary Photographs members of the AAH.
  • Genetics in the United Kingdom — the Last Half-Century

    Genetics in the United Kingdom — the Last Half-Century

    Heredity7l (1993) 111—118 Genetical Society of Great Britain Genetics in the United Kingdom — The Last Half-Century J. R. S. FINCHAM Thisyear's 16th International Congress of Genetics in Birmingham is the first to be held in the United Kingdom since the 7th (Edinburgh) Congress in 1939, just before the outbreak of war. This historical essay is an attempt to chart the most important developments in U.K. genetics between these two Congresses or, more precisely, during the post-war period. I have tried to identify the institutions and schools that have had the greatest influence on the growth of our subject, and to trace the connections between them. I must to some extent be biased by my own partial view of the field, and I apologize for any serious omissions. University, and establishing the fungus Aspergillus The early post-war scene nidulans as a model microbial eukaryote for genetic In1945therewere only a few centres in the U.K. for studies. The Cambridge University Botany School was teaching and research in genetics. There was the John another growth point for fungal genetics; Harold Innes Horticultural Institution (now the John Innes Whitehouse had already completed his Ph.D. work on Institute), then located in Merton, South London, with Neurospora sitophila and David Catcheside was about C.D. Darlington as Director. There were three institu- to import Neurospora crassa from CalTech. In R. A. tions concerned with plant breeding: the Plant Breed- Fisher's Genetics Department, L. L. Cavalli-Sforza was ing Institute in Cambridge and the Welsh and Scottish starting the work on the genetics of E.