Genetics in the United Kingdom — the Last Half-Century

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Genetics in the United Kingdom — the Last Half-Century Heredity7l (1993) 111—118 Genetical Society of Great Britain Genetics in the United Kingdom — The Last Half-Century J. R. S. FINCHAM Thisyear's 16th International Congress of Genetics in Birmingham is the first to be held in the United Kingdom since the 7th (Edinburgh) Congress in 1939, just before the outbreak of war. This historical essay is an attempt to chart the most important developments in U.K. genetics between these two Congresses or, more precisely, during the post-war period. I have tried to identify the institutions and schools that have had the greatest influence on the growth of our subject, and to trace the connections between them. I must to some extent be biased by my own partial view of the field, and I apologize for any serious omissions. University, and establishing the fungus Aspergillus The early post-war scene nidulans as a model microbial eukaryote for genetic In1945therewere only a few centres in the U.K. for studies. The Cambridge University Botany School was teaching and research in genetics. There was the John another growth point for fungal genetics; Harold Innes Horticultural Institution (now the John Innes Whitehouse had already completed his Ph.D. work on Institute), then located in Merton, South London, with Neurospora sitophila and David Catcheside was about C.D. Darlington as Director. There were three institu- to import Neurospora crassa from CalTech. In R. A. tions concerned with plant breeding: the Plant Breed- Fisher's Genetics Department, L. L. Cavalli-Sforza was ing Institute in Cambridge and the Welsh and Scottish starting the work on the genetics of E. co/i that was to Plant Breeding Stations, near Aberystwyth and Edin- lead to his discovery of one of the first two high- burgh, respectively. In University College, London, frequency-recombination strains, HfrC. The other, there was the Galton Laboratory, with L. S. Penrose as HfrH, was found a little later by W. (Bill) Hayes, of the the Galton Professor of Eugenics, and the Department London Postgraduate Medical School in Hammer- of Biometry and Genetics with J. B. S. Haldane as smith. Hayes became the leader of the subsequent great Professor of Biometry. In Cambridge, R. A. Fisher expansion of bacterial genetics in the U.K. presided over a small Department of Genetics accommo- Two members of the John Innes Institution left to dated in an extension to his private house, while, on the seed genetics elsewhere. P. T. Thomas became Profes- other side of town in the Botany School, several young sor of Agricultural Botany in the University of Wales, geneticists and cytologists were working under the Aberystwyth to teach a generation of Welsh plant guidance of D. G. Catcheside. In the Oxford Zoology cytologists and geneticists, several of whom (H. J. Department, E. B. Ford, with his population studies on Evans, H. Rees, E. A. Bevan, K. W Jones) are Lepidoptera, was a pioneer in ecological genetics. mentioned below. And in 1948 Kenneth Mather The immediate post-war period was a time of new moved to Birmingham University to found a new departures. In 1945, C. H. Waddington was appointed Department of Genetics and a powerful school of head of the Genetics Section of the newly established biometrical genetics, the most notable member of Animal Breeding and Genetics Research Organization which, from the mid-1950s, was John L. Jinks, who (ABGRO —laterABRO), funded by the Agricultural succeeded Mather to the Chair in 1965. In 1950 Research Council (ARC). IN 1946, the Organization Darlington and the John Innes moved from Merton to moved from London to Edinburgh, where Waddington a fine country estate in Bayfordbury, Hertfordshire. had been appointed to the Chair of Genetics in succes- sion to F. A. E. Crew. This appointment led to many MRC initiatives further developments, of which more below. Early On the other side of Scotland, Guido Pontecorvo Someof the most significant early post-war develop- was starting a new Department of Genetics at Glasgow ments took place under the auspices of the Medical 111 112 J. R. S. FINCHAM Research Council (MRC). Most important of all, in that Western General Hospital under the direction of W. H. it was about to revolutionize our subject, was the MRC Court Brown. Since 1969 it has been headed by H. Molecular Biology Unit, established in Cambridge in JoIm Evans. Though modestly called a Unit, it became 1947 with Max Perutz as Director and John Kendrew a substantial Institute of international importance, with as his deputy. This Unit was concerned mainly with special strength in innovative chromosome technology, protein crystallography, but it also provided the venue characterization of human chromosome aberrations, for Jim Watson and Francis Crick's momentous eluci- and research on radiation effects, with extensive use of dation of DNA structure. A few years later it played the mouse as a model mammal. host for a while to Seymour Benzer, who was then engaged on his demolition of the classical concept of the gene. The Cambridge MRC Unit was the direct Theexpansion of genetics in the Universities precursor of the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, established in 1962 in a large new building on The earliest Genetics Departments Hills Road with an all-star staff including Francis Crick, Atthe end of the 1940s there were independent Fred Sanger and Sydney Brenner. Crick and Brenner Departments of Genetics in four Universities —the led the molecular genetics group and attacked the long-established departments in Cambridge and Edin- coding problem, with results too well-known to need burgh and the new ones in Birmingham and Glasgow. description here. Edinburgh was the first of these to undergo major Another MRC initiative was their establishment of development. Soon after its move to Edinburgh in the Radiobiology Research Unit in Harwell. The inter- 1947, ABGRO was divided into the Animal Breeding ests of this Unit were by no means confined to radia- Research Organization (ABRO), a free-standing Insti- tion. In the 1950s, C. E. Ford carried out the first tute under H. P. Donald, later accommodated on the definitive studies on human chromosomes in meiosis. University campus, and the Agricultural Research In 1961 Mary Lyon demonstrated X-chromosome Council ARC Unit of Animal Genetics, which was inactivation in female mice; she had started her work in assimilated into the University Department to form the Edinburgh where the Harwell Unit had an outpost in Institute of Animal Genetics with Waddington as Head. its early days. It was in Edinburgh that Charlotte This ARC Unit became famous for its work on the Auerbach had (during the war) discovered chemical theory and practice of selection, with Alan Robertson mutagenesis. In 1958 the MRC established a Muta- (Drosophila and cattle) and Douglas Falconer (mice) as genesis Unit there under her direction, which was the leading figures. This interest, combined with continued until her retirement. theoretical population genetics, continues to flourish in The 1950s saw the first flowering of bacterial and Edinburgh under the leadership of Robertson's student bacteriophage genetics in the U.K., and this too was and successor W. G. (Bill) Hill. It had, and still has, a largely funded by the MRC In 1957 an MRC Unit of strong teaching aspect in the form of a unique post- Molecular Genetics was set up under Bill Hayes at graduate course in animal breeding, run in collabora- Hammersmith Hospital. This soon became an tion with the ABRO staff. extremely strong international centre for the develop- With their emphasis on animals, random mating and ment of E. co/i genetics in all its aspects. At the same small populations, the Edinburgh quantitative geneti- time, Martin Pollock, at the MRC National Institute for cists differed from their Birmingham counterparts Medical Research (NIMR) at Mill Hill (North (who were also supported by the ARC) both in London), was working on bacterial enzyme induction, methodology and, to some extent, in philosophy. This interacting with Jacques Monod's group in Paris. difference at least partly accounts for our having two Pollock and Hayes and their respective colleagues general genetics journals, Heredity and Genetical (including almost the whole strong Hammersmith Research (the longer-established Journal of Genetics group) were later (1968) to join forces in a new, was taken by Haldane to India in 1957). Genetical impressively housed Molecular Biology Department in Research, which started in 1960, was edited from the the University of Edinburgh —asuccessful hybrid Institute of Animal Genetics by Eric Reeve, who has between an MRC Institute and a University teaching continued in the job to this day. department. Waddington's own interest included both selection In 1956, after the clarification by Tjio and Levan in and animal development. His experiments on selection Sweden of the human karyotype, the time was ripe for for response to temperature stress led to his concept of a new initiative in human cytogenetics, and the MRC genetic assimilation, and his thinking about develop- set up the Clinical and Population Cytogenetics Unit ment to his ideas about canalization —modelledas (now the Human Genetics Unit) at the Edinburgh epigenetic landscapes'. For support for these interests GENETICS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM 113 he turned to the MRC, and, from 1963, obtained fund- areas, notably cytology (Hubert Rees and later Gareth ing for an Epigenetics Unit, which obtained its own Jones) and bacterial genetics (Derek Smith, the Secre- building. The Edinburgh Epigenetics group, particu- tary of the present International Congress). larly Max Birnstiel, Ken Jones and John Bishop, made The Glasgow Department's great strength, derived a big mark in animal molecular biology, with from Pontecorvo, was always in Aspergillus genetics, pioneering work on such topics as rRNA genes, in situ which was important not only in itself but also for its hybridization of probes to chromosomes, and analysis impact on genetics in general.
Recommended publications
  • Sports Planners Guide
    SPORTS PLANNERS GUIDE SPORTS PLANNERS GUIDE | 1 2 | SPORTS PLANNERS GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS BASEBALL & SOFTBALL 06 BASKETBALL 10 BOWLING 14 CHEERLEADING 16 CROSS COUNTRY 18 DOG RACING 19 FENCING 20 FOOTBALL 22 GOLF 25 GYMNASTICS 29 ICE SKATING 31 LACROSSE 32 MOTORSPORTS 36 SOCCER 37 SWIMMING 42 TENNIS 44 TOURNAMENT FISHING 48 TRACK & FIELD 50 VOLLEYBALL 52 WHEELCHAIR SPORTS 56 WRESTLING 57 PARKS AND RECREATION 59 SPORTS MUSEUMS 60 FACILITY DIAGRAMS 62 REFERENCE GUIDE 74 SPORTS PLANNERS GUIDE | 3 4 | SPORTS PLANNERS GUIDE SPORTS PLANNERS GUIDE IT’S MORE THAN JUST A GAME IN BIRMINGHAM What’s in Birmingham? Everything. From a convenient location and state-of-the-art facilities to our easy-to-use planning resources, hosting your next sports event in Birmingham is a win-win. Birmingham’s four distinct seasons and beautiful facilities of the Southeastern Conference and Southwestern Athletic provide the backdrop for a range of competitions such Conference, Birmingham has long been a hub of all things as NCAA championships, SEC, SIAC, SWAC, and Gulf South athletic. Add to that the convenience of an international Conference championships, NASCAR and Indy Racing, the airport and the entertainment options that fill Alabama’s Davis Cup, the Bassmaster Classic and the Regions largest city, and it’s no wonder why Birmingham is fast Tradition golf tournament. And with more than 3.4 million becoming one of the nation’s favorite spots to play. people living within 100 miles, our population packs the house for some of the South’s best sporting events. Home to the Alabama Sports Hall of Fame and headquarters SPORTS PLANNERS GUIDE | 5 BASEBALL & SOFTBALL BIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGE HOMEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL SOFTBALL PARK (P) 205.871.9663 (F) 205.879.0879 1901 SOUTH LAKESHORE DRIVE (P) 205.226.4600 (F) 205.226.3049 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35309 900 ARKADELPHIA ROAD BIRMINGHAM, AL 35254 Facility is located on the campus of Homewood High (W) BSCSPORTS.NET/FACILITIES/SOFTBALL_PARK School.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming Eugenics
    Working Papers on the Nature of Evidence: How Well Do “Facts” Travel? No. 12/06 Confronting the Stigma of Perfection: Genetic Demography, Diversity and the Quest for a Democratic Eugenics in the Post-war United States Edmund Ramsden © Edmund Ramsden Department of Economic History London School of Economics August 2006 how ‘facts’ “The Nature of Evidence: How Well Do ‘Facts’ Travel?” is funded by The Leverhulme Trust and the E.S.R.C. at the Department of Economic History, London School of Economics. For further details about this project and additional copies of this, and other papers in the series, go to: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collection/economichistory/ Series Editor: Dr. Jon Adams Department of Economic History London School of Economics Houghton Street London WC2A 2AE Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0) 20 7955 6727 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7955 7730 Confronting the Stigma of Perfection: Genetic Demography, Diversity and the Quest for a Democratic Eugenics in the Post- war United States1 Edmund Ramsden Abstract Eugenics has played an important role in the relations between social and biological scientists of population through time. Having served as a site for the sharing of data and methods between disciplines in the early twentieth century, scientists and historians have tended to view its legacy in terms of reduction and division - contributing distrust, even antipathy, between communities in the social and the biological sciences. Following the work of Erving Goffman, this paper will explore how eugenics has, as the epitome of “bad” or “abnormal” science, served as a “stigma symbol” in the politics of boundary work.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Chromosomes: Evolution of Beneficial to Males but Harmful to Females, and the Other Has the the Weird and Wonderful Opposite Effect
    Dispatch R129 microtubule plus ends is coupled to of kinesin-mediated transport of Bik1 1The Scripps Research Institute, microtubule assembly. J. Cell Biol. 144, (CLIP-170) regulates microtubule Department of Cell Biology, 10550 99–112. stability and dynein activation. Dev. Cell 11. Arnal, I., Karsenti, E., and Hyman, A.A. 6, 815–829. North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, (2000). Structural transitions at 14. Andersen, S.S., and Karsenti, E. (1997). California 92037, USA. microtubule ends correlate with their XMAP310: a Xenopus rescue-promoting E-mail: [email protected] dynamic properties in Xenopus egg factor localized to the mitotic spindle. J. 2Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, extracts. J. Cell Biol. 149, 767–774. Cell Biol. 139, 975–983. Department of Cellular and Molecular 12. Busch, K.E., Hayles, J., Nurse, P., and 15. Schroer, T.A. (2004). Dynactin. Annu. Brunner, D. (2004). Tea2p kinesin is Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 20, 759–779. Medicine, CMM-E Rm 3052, 9500 involved in spatial microtubule 16. Vaughan, P.S., Miura, P., Henderson, M., Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92037, organization by transporting tip1p on Byrne, B., and Vaughan, K.T. (2002). A USA. E-mail: [email protected] microtubules. Dev. Cell 6, 831–843. role for regulated binding of p150(Glued) 13. Carvalho, P., Gupta, M.L., Jr., Hoyt, M.A., to microtubule plus ends in organelle and Pellman, D. (2004). Cell cycle control transport. J. Cell Biol. 158, 305–319. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.02.010 Sex Chromosomes: Evolution of beneficial to males but harmful to females, and the other has the the Weird and Wonderful opposite effect.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Draft Birmingham Design Guide
    Birmingham Design Guide Healthy Living and Working Places City Manual Draft • November 2020 1 Birmingham Design Guide Healthy Living and Working Places City Manual Draft • November 2020 Images by Tim Cornbill Photography, Simon Felton, Thomas Morris, Stuart Wiltshire, Javelin Block and Intervention Architecture birmingham design guide / healthy living and working places city manual healthy living and working places city manual / birmingham design guide 2 3 C Contents Neighbourhoods p6 CITY NOTE LW-8 CITY NOTE LW-17 Facade detailing p16 Extending dwellings in the green belt p28 Retaining quality at higher densities p6 CITY NOTE LW-9 CITY NOTE LW-18 CITY NOTE LW-1 Utilitarian infrastructure p16 Location of extensions p32 Layouts and architectural response p6 Designing high quality homes p18 CITY NOTE LW-19 CITY NOTE LW-2 Roof top extensions p30 Street environment - street width/building heights p9 CITY NOTE LW-10 Modern architecture p18 CITY NOTE LW-20 Basement extensions p30 Protecting resident amenity p9 CITY NOTE LW-11 CITY NOTE LW-3 Internal space p18 CITY NOTE LW-21 Residential privacy and overlooking p9 Garages, outbuildings and parking p30 CITY NOTE LW-12 CITY NOTE LW-4 Natural light and solar gain p23 CITY NOTE LW-22 45 degree code p10 Garden extensions p30 CITY NOTE LW-13 Outdoor amenity space for residents p23 Design details p33 Buildings and their uses p12 CITY NOTE LW-14 CITY NOTE LW-23 Adaptable and accessible homes p24 Layout p33 Architectural cohesion and quality p12 CITY NOTE LW-15 CITY NOTE LW-24 CITY NOTE LW-5 Consuderation
    [Show full text]
  • SOHASKY-DISSERTATION-2017.Pdf (2.074Mb)
    DIFFERENTIAL MINDS: MASS INTELLIGENCE TESTING AND RACE SCIENCE IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY by Kate E. Sohasky A dissertation submitted to the Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Baltimore, Maryland May 9, 2017 © Kate E. Sohasky All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Historians have argued that race science and eugenics retreated following their discrediting in the wake of the Second World War. Yet if race science and eugenics disappeared, how does one explain their sudden and unexpected reemergence in the form of the neohereditarian work of Arthur Jensen, Richard Herrnstein, and Charles Murray? This dissertation argues that race science and eugenics did not retreat following their discrediting. Rather, race science and eugenics adapted to changing political and social climes, at times entering into states of latency, throughout the twentieth century. The transnational history of mass intelligence testing in the twentieth century demonstrates the longevity of race science and eugenics long after their discrediting. Indeed, the tropes of race science and eugenics persist today in the modern I.Q. controversy, as the dissertation shows. By examining the history of mass intelligence testing in multiple nations, this dissertation presents narrative of the continuity of race science and eugenics throughout the twentieth century. Dissertation Committee: Advisors: Angus Burgin and Ronald G. Walters Readers: Louis Galambos, Nathaniel Comfort, and Adam Sheingate Alternates: François Furstenberg
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies and Experiences to Improve Research Uptake: the Royal Society and UK Science Funding
    Strategies and experiences to improve research uptake: The Royal Society and UK science funding Wider context Credit crunch UK Government Deficit New government Spending cuts The Royal Society Advisory Group Sir Martin Taylor FRS (Chair), Former Vice-President and Physical Secretary, The Royal Society Professor Glynis Breakwell, Vice-Chancellor, University of Bath Professor Ann Dowling DBE CBE FRS FREng, Professor of Engineering, University of Cambridge Sir Martin Evans FRS, Director, Cardiff School of Biosciences Sir Richard Friend FRS. Professor of Physics, University of Cambridge Professor Rachel Griffith FBA, Deputy Research Director, Institute for Fiscal Studies Professor Wendy Hall DBE FREng FRS, Professor of Computer Science, University of Southampton Dr Emily Holmes, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford Professor Richard Jones FRS, Professor of Physics, Sheffield University Professor Ben Martin, Science and Technology Policy Research Unit (SPRU) Paul Mountford, President, Emerging Markets, Cisco Professor Helga Nowotny, Vice-President, European Research Council Sir Paul Nurse FRS, President, Rockefeller University, New York City Dr David Roblin, Vice-President Global R&D, Pfizer Lord Sainsbury of Turville FRS, Gatsby Charitable Foundation Lord Waldegrave of North Hill, Provost, Eton College Sir Mark Walport, Director of the Wellcome Trust Sir Alan Wilson FRS FBA, Chairman, Arts and Humanities Research Council 7 Engagement across the political spectrum Lord Sainsbury of Turville FRS, Lord Waldegrave of North Hill, Conservative Labour Public R&D expenditure, 1970-2007 The UK punches above its weight The Cambridge phenomenon People in and outside science Global competition Average annual growth in R&D budgets, 1997-2007 ‘By the end of 2020…China will join the ranks of the world’s most innovative countries’ President Hu Jintao, Jan 2006 Investing in the downturn 0.60% 0.50% 0.40% Green technology R&D 0.30% GDP 0.20% 0.10% 0.00% Finland Norway Canada Portugal Germany Sweden USA Recommendations 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Biochemistry, Genetics, Molecular and Cell Biology) Hit the Newspaper Headlines on a Weekly Basis
    The Tenovus-Scotland Symposia and Medal Lectures Today medical advances as a result of discoveries in the Life Sciences (Biochemistry, Genetics, Molecular and Cell Biology) hit the newspaper headlines on a weekly basis. This was not the case at the time of the first Tenovus-Scotland Symposium nearly 35 years ago. Since the discovery of the structure of DNA twenty years earlier, great advances had been made in understanding, at the level of molecules, how genes work in the cell. From study of simple bacteria and viruses, it was known that the information for making all the different proteins in the cell was encoded in the sequence of nucleotides, the individual chemical units of DNA, but study of higher organisms seemed impossibly complex. The chromosomes in each human cell have about 23,000 genes in their DNA that contains a total of about three thousand million nucleotides - how would it be possible to study these genes individually? Three staff from the Biochemistry Department and the Beatson Institute planned a two day meeting at Glasgow University in 1974 to bring together scientists to discuss and learn about the new discoveries that were beginning to provide answers to that fundamental question. Sir Charles Illingworth, who had recently founded Tenovus- Scotland, saw the importance of these studies and their potential future application in medicine and agreed a grant towards the cost of the meeting, which we called the Tenovus-Scotland Symposium although the First Meeting was also jointly sponsored by the Nucleotide Group of the
    [Show full text]
  • The Mendel Newsletter
    THE MENDEL NEWSLETTER Archival Resources for the History of Genetics & Allied Sciences ISSUED BY THE LIBRARY OF THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY New Series, No. 20 June 2015 IN THIS ISSUE John Marius Opitz Papers at the American Philosophical Society — Charles Greifenstein 3 Animal Genetics Collections at Edinburgh University Library Special Collections — Clare Button 6 Rethinking Russian Studies on the Genetics of Natural Populations: Vassily Babkoff’s Papers and the History of the “Evolutionary Brigade,” 1934–1940 — Kirill Rossiianov and Tatiana Avrutskaya 15 Centrum Mendelianum: The Mendel Museum Moved to the Former Premises of Mendel’s Scientific Society — Anna Matalová and Eva Matalová 25 Resident Research Fellowships in Genetics, History of Medicine and Related Disciplines 36 THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY LIBRARY Philadelphia The Mendel Newsletter June 2015 The Mendel Newsletter American Philosophical Society Library 105 South Fifth Street Philadelphia PA 19106-3386 U.S.A. www.amphilsoc.org/library Editor Managing Editor Michael Dietrich Earle E. Spamer, American Philosophical Society Department of Biological Sciences [email protected] 215 Gilman Hall, HB 6044 Dartmouth College Hanover NH 03755 The Mendel Newsletter [email protected] [email protected] Editorial Board Mark B. Adams, University of Pennsylvania Barbara Kimmelman, Philadelphia University Garland E. Allen, Washington University Martin L. Levitt, American Philosophical Society John Beatty, University of Minnesota Jane Maienschein, Arizona State University Frederick B. Churchill, Indiana University Diane B. Paul, University of Massachusetts, Boston Michael R. Dietrich, Dartmouth College Jan Sapp, York University,Toronto Bernardino Fantini, Institut Louis Jantet d’Histoire Vassiliki Beatty Smocovitis, University of Florida de Medicine, Geneva The Mendel Newsletter, New Series, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Program Guide
    2011 C. elegans Meeting Organizing Committee Co-chairs: Oliver Hobert Columbia University Meera Sundaram University of Pennsylvania Organizing Committee: Raffi Aroian University of California, San Diego Ikue Mori Nagoya University Jean-Louis Bessereau INSERM Benjamin Podbilewicz Technion Israel Institute of Keith Blackwell Harvard Medical School Technology Andrew Chisholm University of California, San Diego Valerie Reinke Yale University Barbara Conradt Dartmouth Medical School Janet Richmond University of Illinois, Chicago Marie Anne Felix CNRS-Institut Jacques Monod Ann Rougvie University of Minnesota David Greenstein University of Minnesota Shai Shaham Rockefeller University Alla Grishok Columbia University Ahna Skop University of Wisconsin, Madison Craig Hunter Harvard University Ralf Sommer Max-Planck Institute for Bill Kelly Emory University Developmental Biology, Tuebingen Ed Kipreos University of Georgia Asako Sugimoto RIKEN, Kobe Todd Lamitina University of Pennsylvania Heidi Tissenbaum University of Massachusetts Chris Li City College of New York Medical School Sponsored by The Genetics Society of America 9650 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20814-3998 telephone: (301) 634-7300 fax: (301) 634-7079 e-mail: [email protected] Web site: http:/www.genetics-gsa.org Front cover design courtesy of Ahna Skop 1 Table of Contents Schedule of All Events.....................................................................................................................4 Maps University of California, Los Angeles, Campus .....................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Faith and Thought
    1981 Vol. 108 No. 3 Faith and Thought Journal of the Victoria Institute or Philosophical Society of Great Britain Published by THE VICTORIA INSTITUTE 29 QUEEN STREET, LONDON, EC4R IBH Tel: 01-248-3643 July 1982 ABOUT THIS JOURNAL FAITH AND THOUGHT, the continuation of the JOURNAL OF THE TRANSACTIONS OF THE VICTORIA INSTITUTE OR PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY OF GREAT BRITAIN, has been published regularly since the formation of the Society in 1865. The title was changed in 1958 (Vol. 90). FAITH AND THOUGHT is now published three times a year, price per issue £5.00 (post free) and is available from the Society's Address, 29 Queen Street, London, EC4R 1BH. Back issues are often available. For details of prices apply to the Secretary. FAITH AND THOUGHT is issued free to FELLOWS, MEMBERS AND ASSOCIATES of the Victoria Institute. Applications for membership should be accompanied by a remittance which will be returned in the event of non-election. (Subscriptions are: FELLOWS £10.00; MEMBERS £8.00; AS SOCIATES, full-time students, below the age of 25 years, full-time or retired clergy or other Christian workers on small incomes £5.00; LIBRARY SUBSCRIBERS £10.00. FELLOWS must be Christians and must be nominated by a FELLOW.) Subscriptions which may be paid by covenant are accepted by Inland Revenue Authorities as an allowable expense against income tax for ministers of religion, teachers of RI, etc. For further details, covenant forms, etc, apply to the Society. EDITORIAL ADDRESS 29 Almond Grove, Bar Hill, Cambridge, CB3 8DU. © Copyright by the Victoria Institute and Contributors, 1981 UK ISSN 0014-7028 FAITH 1981 AND Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Caenorhabditis Microbiota: Worm Guts Get Populated Laura C
    Clark and Hodgkin BMC Biology (2016) 14:37 DOI 10.1186/s12915-016-0260-7 COMMENTARY Open Access Caenorhabditis microbiota: worm guts get populated Laura C. Clark and Jonathan Hodgkin* Please see related Research article: The native microbiome of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: Gateway to a new host-microbiome model, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-016-0258-1 effects on the life history of the worm are often profound Abstract [2]. It has been increasingly recognized that the worm Until recently, almost nothing has been known about microbiota is an important consideration in achieving a the natural microbiota of the model nematode naturalistic experimental model in which to study, for Caenorhabditis elegans. Reporting their research in instance, host–pathogen interactions or worm behavior. BMC Biology, Dirksen and colleagues describe the first Dirksen et al [3] present the first step towards under- sequencing effort to characterize the gut microbiota standing understanding the complex interactions of the of environmentally isolated C. elegans and the related natural worm microbiota by reporting a 16S rDNA-based taxa Caenorhabditis briggsae and Caenorhabditis “head count” of the bacterial population present in wild remanei In contrast to the monoxenic, microbiota-free nematode isolates (Fig. 1). Interestingly, it appears that cultures that are studied in hundreds of laboratories, it nematodes isolated from diverse natural environment- appears that natural populations of Caenorhabditis s—and even those that have been maintained for a short harbor distinct microbiotas. time on E. coli following isolation—share a “core” host- defined microbiota. This finding is in agreement with work by Berg et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Fellows Biographical Index Part
    Former Fellows of The Royal Society of Edinburgh 1783 – 2002 Biographical Index Part Two ISBN 0 902198 84 X Published July 2006 © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 22-26 George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 2PQ BIOGRAPHICAL INDEX OF FORMER FELLOWS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH 1783 – 2002 PART II K-Z C D Waterston and A Macmillan Shearer This is a print-out of the biographical index of over 4000 former Fellows of the Royal Society of Edinburgh as held on the Society’s computer system in October 2005. It lists former Fellows from the foundation of the Society in 1783 to October 2002. Most are deceased Fellows up to and including the list given in the RSE Directory 2003 (Session 2002-3) but some former Fellows who left the Society by resignation or were removed from the roll are still living. HISTORY OF THE PROJECT Information on the Fellowship has been kept by the Society in many ways – unpublished sources include Council and Committee Minutes, Card Indices, and correspondence; published sources such as Transactions, Proceedings, Year Books, Billets, Candidates Lists, etc. All have been examined by the compilers, who have found the Minutes, particularly Committee Minutes, to be of variable quality, and it is to be regretted that the Society’s holdings of published billets and candidates lists are incomplete. The late Professor Neil Campbell prepared from these sources a loose-leaf list of some 1500 Ordinary Fellows elected during the Society’s first hundred years. He listed name and forenames, title where applicable and national honours, profession or discipline, position held, some information on membership of the other societies, dates of birth, election to the Society and death or resignation from the Society and reference to a printed biography.
    [Show full text]