VILLAGE OF MORTON GROVE Plan Commission Agenda
July 20, 2020 - 7:00 P.M. Flickinger Municipal Center, 6101 Capulina Avenue, Morton Grove, IL 60053
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF: June 15, 2020
III. ITEMS TO BE CONTINUED
CASE: PC 20-03*
APPLICANT: Village of Morton Grove 6101 Capulina Avenue Morton Grove, IL 60053
LOCATION: 6101 Capulina Avenue Morton Grove, IL 60053
PETITION: Request for amendments to Sections 12-3-6 and 12-17-1 of the Morton Grove Unified Development Code regarding the regulation of telecommunications antennas, support structures, and ancillary equipment
* Staff requests a continuation of PC 20-03 to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Plan Commission (August 17, 2020) to allow further preparation
CASE: PC 20-07
APPLICANT: Medina Gardens LLC 6037 Lincoln Avenue Morton Grove, IL 60053
LOCATION: 6037 Lincoln Avenue Morton Grove, IL 60053
PETITION: Request for approval of a Preliminary Plat of Subdivision to create eight (8) new lots of record for the development of four (4) attached single-family dwellings and six (6) detached single-family dwellings, and a Planned Unit Development (PUD) with waivers to Sections 12-2-5, 12-2-6, 12-3-5, and 12-4-2 for lot width, floor area ratio, front yard, impervious lot and rear yard coverage, fencing, and driveway setback, waivers to Section 12-8-4 for lot standards, and waivers to Chapter 12-9 for accessway design, for the property commonly known as 6037 Lincoln Avenue (10 20-122-076-0000)
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
CASE: PC 20-08
APPLICANT: Morton Grove Park District 6834 Dempster Street Morton Grove, IL 60053
LOCATION: 6250 Dempster Street Morton Grove, IL 60053
PETITION: Request for approval of a Special Use Permit for a Recreation Facility to allow improvement of the Harrer aquatic facility, with a waiver to Section 12-2-2 for maximum number of accessory structures permitted on a zoning lot for the property commonly known as 6250 Lincoln Avenue (10-17-305-007-0000)
CASE: PC 20-09*
APPLICANT: MedTec Healthcare & Private Duty, LLC 9242 Waukegan Road Morton Grove, IL 60053
LOCATION: 6101 Capulina Avenue Morton Grove, IL 60053
PETITION: Request for approval of a Text Amendment to Sections 12-4-4:E and Chapter 12-5 of the Morton Grove Unified Development Code (Title 12) to list “Daycare, Adult” as a Special Use in the M-O/R Office/Research Manufacturing District and establish development standards for the use of “Daycare, Adult”
* The Applicant requests a continuation of PC 20-09 to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Plan Commission (August 17, 2020) to allow further preparation
CASE: PC 20-10*
APPLICANT: MedTec Healthcare & Private Duty, LLC 9242 Waukegan Road Morton Grove, IL 60053
LOCATION: 8145 River Drive, Suite 100 Morton Grove, IL 60053
PETITION: Request for approval of a Special Use Permit to operate a “Daycare, Adult” in the M- O/R Office/Research Manufacturing District for the property commonly known as 8145 River Drive, Suite 100 (10-20-303-001-0000).
* The Applicant requests a continuation of PC 20-10 to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Plan Commission (August 17, 2020) to allow further preparation
V. OTHER BUSINESS
None
VI. CLOSE MEETING
All interested parties are invited to attend. Social distancing measures will be in place to ensure the safety of the public and Village staff. All persons attending the meeting in-person must wear a face covering. All persons in attendance will have the opportunity to be heard during periods of public comment.
If you feel sick, please stay home.
Comments relating to the above cases may be submitted to the ZBA in advance, and will be read aloud at the public meeting by Village staff. Please send comments, along with your name and address, to [email protected] no later than 5:00 PM on Monday, July 20, 2020.
2 of 2
MINUTES OF THE JUNE 15, 2020 MEETING OF THE PLAN COMMISSION VILLAGE HALL 6101 CAPULINA, MORTON GROVE, IL 60053 AND VIRTUAL VIA ZOOM
Pursuant to proper notice in accordance with the Open Meetings Act, the regular meeting of the Plan Commission was called to order at 7:34 by Chairperson Blonz. Secretary Sheehan called the role. Members of the Commission Present: Blonz, Dorgan, Gabriel, Gillespie, Khan, Kintner, Mohr Village Staff Present: Zoe Heidorn, Zoning Administrator/Land Use Planner, Rick Dobrowski, Fire Prevention Bureau, Jim English, Manager Building and Inspectional Services, Teresa Liston, Corporation Council, Ralph Czerwinski, Village Administer
Trustees Present: Grear, Minx, Thill
Chairperson Blonz described the procedures for the meeting. The Village and the applicant will present the case and the commission may ask questions of the applicant. Then anyone from the audience will be allowed to speak. Chairperson Blonz proceeded to seek approval of the May 18, 2020 minutes. Commissioner Kintner moved to approve the minutes of May 18, 2020 with an amendment to note that the meeting took place over zoom. Commissioner Khan seconded the motion. Chairperson Blonz called for the vote. Commissioner Kintner voting aye Commissioner Dorgan voting aye Commissioner Gillespie voting aye Commissioner Gabriel voting aye Commissioner Khan voting aye Commissioner Mohr voting aye Chairperson Blonz voting aye Minutes approved. Chairperson Blonz called for the first case.
CASE: PC 20-03* APPLICANT: Village of Morton Grove 6101 Capulina Avenue Morton Grove, IL 60053 LOCATION: 6101 Capulina Avenue Morton Grove, IL 60053 PETITION: Request for amendments to Sections 12-3-6 and 12-17-1 of the Morton Grove Unified Development Code regarding the regulation of telecommunications antennas, support structures, and ancillary equipment * Staff requests a continuation of PC 20-03 to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Plan Commission (July 20, 2020) to allow further review and preparation by staff.
There were no questions or comments from the commission.
Chairperson Blonz called for a motion to continue Case PC 20-03.
Commissioner Gabriel moved to continue Case PC 20-03. Commissioner Gillespie seconded the motion and approved unanimously pursuant to a roll call vote of 7-0.
CASE: PC 20-05
APPLICANT: Nick Boyle, President Ampler Development LLC 4700 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 400 Raleigh, NC 27609
LOCATION: 8840 Waukegan Road Morton Grove, IL 60053
PETITION: Request for approval of a Special Use Permit for a restaurant with a drive-through facility (Taco Bell), pursuant to Section 12-4-3:D of the Morton Gove Unified Development Code for the property commonly known as 8840 Waukegan Road (10-18-320-012-0000, 10-18-320-013-0000, 10-18-320-014-0000, 10-18-320-015-0000, 10- 18-320-016-0000)
At the Plan Commission hearing for PC 20-05, Zoe Heidorn, Land Use Planner, provided a brief introduction to the application. She stated that Ampler Development LLC is requesting approval of a Special Use Permit in order to develop a 1,778-square –foot restaurant with a drive-through facility at the southwest corner of Waukegan Road and Greenwood Avenue. The submitted independent traffic and parking impact study establishes a peak parking demand of 11 spaces, where 15 are proposed on the site. She explained that the development complies with all dimensional requirements of the C1 District and the minimum drive-through stacking length requirement of 100 feet. Recent changes to the site plan in response to comments issued by IDOT resulted in changes to the landscape plan approved at the June 1 Appearance Commission hearing and new non-conformities with the Village’s landscape requirements. She noted that the Applicant will present a conforming landscape plan at tonight’s meeting. She added that staff is recommending a series of conditions of Special Use Permit approval relating to pedestrian access, bicycle storage facilities, hours of operation, maximum number of employees on-site, and location of employee parking and snow storage.
Mario Valentini (MRV Architects), Alfred Teleron (MRV Architects), Dan Peyton (Director of Development, Ampler Development), and William Grieve (GHA Engineers) introduced themselves to the Plan Commission and were sworn in.
Mr. Valentini thanked the Plan Commission for the opportunity to present. He stated that the development team has worked through a lot of issues since the beginning of the project and that they appreciate staff’s assistance throughout the process. He added that they have made every effort to make this a safe, attractive, and desirable development for the community. The development has been vetted by the Appearance Commission and reviewed by the Traffic Safety Commission. He noted that some site plan changes have come at the last minute, but that staff and the Applicant have worked through these changes. He added that he is aware of staff comments in relation to changes and will be accommodating in addressing outstanding concerns.
Mr. Valentini stated that Ampler Development operates over 350 fast service restaurants, though not are all Taco Bell stores. He explained that the developer operates stores with a strong attention to detail and maintains a high level of quality across all locations.
Mr. Valentini explained that they have been working closely with IDOT and feel comfortable that the development will not cause any negative impact on traffic along Greenwood or Waukegan.
Chairperson Blonz asked for questions or comments from the Commissioners.
Commissioner Dorgan asked if the public alley to the west of the site will be maintained as an open alley so that Leading Edge Automotive will continue to have access. Mr. Valentini responded that no changes will be made to the existing public alley. He added that the trash enclosure is proposed to face the alley, but that trash pick-up will only occur two times per week and should not cause any issue with the alley’s continued use. He explained that a fence and landscaping will also provide buffering between the site and the alley.
Commissioner Dorgan asked how employees will access the trash enclosure if the gate will face the alley. Mr. Valentini explained that an opening in the fence will provide direct access to the trash enclosure from the site.
Commissioner Dorgan asked if the Village has considered limiting parking along Greenwood Street, explaining that the company across the street uses the street for employee parking.
Ms. Heidorn responded that staff has recommended prohibiting parking along Greenwood Street between the public alley and Waukegan Road, and that compliance with the recommendation has been recommended as a condition of Special Use Permit approval, although the Village has every right to establish this prohibition independently. She added that Greenwood Street should also be restriped to accommodate a dedicated left-turn lane and a dedicated right-turn lane.
Commissioner Dorgan asked if parking permits should be considered within a one- to two-block radius from the development to protect residential parking availability. Ms. Heidorn responded that this was not included as a recommendation from the Village Engineer or herself, but that the Commissioners are welcome to add the permit consideration as a condition of Special Use Permit approval.
Commissioner Dorgan asked how many parking spaces will be used for employee parking. Mr. Valentini responded that three to four spaces would be used for employees. He anticipates that some employees will drive together, some will be hired locally and walk or bike, and some will take public transit. He noted that they are providing a buffer between the parking demand and parking availability. Except for times of shift changes, employee parking demand will be limited.
Commissioner Dorgan asked if spaces will be designated for employees. Mr. Valentini responded no, but that the operators could require employees to park in the less convenient spaces, such as in the parallel spaces along Greenwood Street. The operators understand that leaving the most convenient spaces available for guests is beneficial to business.
Commissioner Kintner asked Mr. Grieve to speak to the consideration taken for the current COVID-19 pandemic, explaining that conditions may have shifted since its onset. Mr. Grieve responded that the restaurant considers the rule of “65s,” explaining that 65% of customer traffic is expected to be drive-through traffic. He added that all traffic counts were taken at the onset of the pandemic, but that historic data was also incorporated. He noted that traffic dropped about 40% between years, so that looking at historic data was important.
Commissioner Kintner asked if increased traffic associated with the Sawmill Station development was considered. Mr. Grieve responded that about 65% of customer traffic is anticipated to be pass-by, meaning guests would already be on their way to a secondary destination when stopping at the restaurant. He added that the study incorporates broader traffic projections provided by the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP), a regional planning agency.
Commissioner Mohr asked how high the fence along the alley will be. Mr. Valentini responded that the fence will be six feet in height. He asked if the fence will be a solid privacy fence. Mr. Valentini responded that it will be a wooden board-on-board fence.
Commissioner Mohr asked if consideration has been given to vehicles coming in and out of Leading Edge Automotive and for additional information on turning into the development from Waukegan Road.
Mr. Valentini responded that they worked with IDOT to move the Waukegan Road driveway south to eliminate traffic conflict for vehicles turning right onto Waukegan Road. He added that the modified driveway design
increases the area for maneuvering. The one-way counter-clockwise circulation will provide a clear direction for traffic coming off of Waukegan Road, with little room for error by drivers. Progressing through a pattern and limiting options keeps drivers safe in the path of travel.
Mr. Grieve responded that most drivers want to turn right-in and right-out. He estimates that 45% will be turning right-in and turning right-out, and that 20% will be coming from the south and heading north, making a left into the site.
Commissioner Mohr asked if the driveway median along Waukegan Road would be striped or structural. Mr. Valentini responded that the median is a structural barrier and will help control traffic flow. He explained that regular guests will quickly come to understand traffic flow on the site.
Commissioner Gabriel commented that traffic flow on the property is well designed and that noise from the drive- through will be limited to the east side of the property. Commissioner Gabriel also asked for hours of operation. Mr. Valentini answered that the store will be open until midnight, and possibly 2:00 AM on weekends. He added that the site design was adjusted to reduce noise heard by residents to the west. Ordering at the window is expected to cause the greatest noise, and was intentionally kept on the east side of the building. Similar to noise pollution, Mr. Valentini added that light pollution will also be limited to the property line. Chairperson Blonz noted that some spillover does occur across the property line.
Commissioner Dorgan asked for the revised landscape plan noted in the staff report. Ms. Heidorn pulled the revised landscape plan up on the shared Zoom screen and on the projector located in the Council Chambers. She explained that two major changes are proposed: (1) two trees are proposed to be preserved within the public right-of-way along Waukegan Road and (2) one tree is proposed to be planted along the south lot line. As presented, the plan complies with the Village’s landscape requirements.
Chairperson Blonz asked for the revised site plan. Ms. Heidorn shared the revised site plan, noting that it is very similar to the plan included in the hearing packet. Two changes include: (1) the addition of an accessible path connecting the public sidewalk to the internal pedestrian system and (2) the addition of a bicycle rack, as recommended by staff.
Commissioner Kahn asked how the store’s traffic volumes will work in conjunction with traffic from the nearby elementary school. She asked if drive-through traffic will conflict with school traffic. Mr. Greive responded that school hours are 8:30 AM to 2:55 PM, and that most traffic will occur outside of the store’s higher traffic volumes. School letting out at 2:55 PM is approximately two hours before the store’s peak traffic time starting at 5:00 PM.
Commissioner Kahn asked the applicant to confirm the maximum number of employees working on the site. Mr. Peyton responded that the shifts typically run with one manager and four employees, varying by time of day. The breakfast shift is very light. Lighter shifts may run with only three employees.
Chairperson Blonz asked Ms. Heidorn to ensure that future plan review forms include a printed name from staff person issuing the comments. Ms. Heidorn responded that she would make sure a clearly printed name will be included in the future.
Chairperson Blonz asked for clarification on the proposed hours of operation. Ms. Heidorn responded that staff is recommending limiting hours of operation to 7:00 AM to 12:00 AM, but that the Plan Commission is welcome to extend those hours to 2:00 AM, as desired by the applicant. Mr. Peyton responded that the developer is requesting a closing time of 12:00 AM Sunday through Thursday, and a closing time of 2:00 AM on Friday and Saturday.
Chairperson Blonz asked for clarification that the landscape plan complies with all requirements, as currently presented. Ms. Heidorn responded that it does, and that the plan will be subject to final approval by the Appearance Commission Chairperson. If he finds the plan to be inconsistent with the approved plan, he may require full Commission review.
Chairperson Blonz asked for clarification of the waiver to the setback requirement for the pylon sign. Ms. Heidorn provided confirmation of the approved setback waiver.
Chairperson Blonz asked for an explanation as to Appearance Commissioner Zimmer’s objection to the proposed development, as noted in the staff report. Ms. Heidorn explained that Commissioner Zimmer did not find the development to be in keeping with the Sawmill Station development at Waukegan and Dempster. She added that Commissioner Zimmer finds the Sawmill Station development to be of a higher quality than the proposed Taco Bell development, but that no more detail as to the differences in quality was provided at the meeting.
Chairperson Blonz asked for confirmation of the final Appearance Commission vote. Ms. Heidorn responded that the final vote was 6-1.
Chairperson Blonz asked if signage will be installed at the driveways and drive-through to direct traffic. Mr. Valentini responded that signage will be installed as needed to ensure traffic flow occurs as needed. A no-left-turn sign will be installed for traffic turning onto Waukegan Road.
Chairperson Blonz asked for the number of accessible parking spaces proposed. Mr. Valentini responded that one space is provided and clarified that it is located along Waukegan Road, closest to the pedestrian entrance. Chairperson Blonz asked for clarification of the projected traffic volumes to the site, as provided in the traffic study. Mr. Grieve explained that the study compares how much traffic is currently along Waukegan Road, and provides a projection of how many cars the store will add to that volume. Those projections are divided by time of day and were based on transaction data taken from across forty stores in the Chicago area. Chairperson Blonz expressed disbelief that so many vehicles would enter the site within an hour.
Chairperson Blonz asked for clarification of the peak drive-through hours. Mr. Grieve confirmed the hours and noted that the numbers were based on transaction data from other stores. He explained that drive-through numbers may be a bit lower based on the smaller store footprint but is confident that the transaction numbers used to generate the trip counts are solid.
Chairperson Blonz asked for several additional points of clarification of the units and data incorporated into the study. Mr. Grieve explained that survey data is separated into 15-minute units and that the longest queue measured along Waukegan Road waiting for a left turn is about two vehicles, indicating that drivers are finding a way onto Waukegan Road. One vehicle is anticipated per six or seven minutes, meaning that vehicles may have to wait for a gap in traffic, but that they will find an opening based on queuing data. Mr. Grieve explained that staff’s recommendation for a dedicated left-turn lane along Greenwood Street would benefit these vehicles. Mr. Grieve also spoke to past traffic volumes associated with the former Produce World.
Chairperson Blonz asked if the applicant has reviewed the comments issued by the Village Engineer. Mr. Valentini explained that the applicant is open to restriping Greenwood Street to provide a dedicated left-turn lane but asks that staff reconsiders asking for a widening of the street. Mr. Valentini reviewed the comments issued to the Traffic Safety Commission and noted that they are understanding of the comments.
Chairperson Blonz asked if the applicant has reviewed and is amenable to complying with all 42 comments issued by the Village Engineer in his plan review comment form. Ms. Heidorn responded that the comments have not yet been forwarded to the applicant, as they were provided later in the week. She clarified that as a recommended condition of approval, compliance will all comments issued by staff will be required. However, alternative compliance, as deemed appropriate by the reviewing staff member, may be approved in lieu of strict compliance with the comment or recommendation. The applicant will be required to respond to each comment and demonstrate compliance, alternative compliance, or that the issue has been adequately addressed by supporting information.
Chairperson Blonz stated that the comments should be reviewed one-by-one. He reviewed the comments with the applicant. He noted that the Village Engineer, Chris Tomich, did an excellent job in providing detailed comment on the proposed development.
Mr. Peyton explained that the store hours requested are desired by the applicant, but that Ampler Development wants to be a good neighbor and only asks that Taco Bell is provided the same hours of operation as other quick- service restaurants. Mr. Valentini explained that the operator has strong control over when trash pick-up and product
delivery occur, and can ensure that times do not interfere with site circulation. He added that access to the trash enclosure can be modified as requested.
Mr. Valentini acknowledged that the applicant intends to comply with all comments issued by the Village Engineer.
Chairperson Blonz asked for comment from members of the public.
Dave Carl, 8910 Sayre Avenue, commented that the high number of vehicles parked along Greenwood Street, whether from the business to the north or to the south, causes a traffic hazard. He stated that the street often becomes congested, especially with buses from the elementary school. If parking will be further limited along Greenwood Street, he anticipates that those businesses will begin parking on other nearby residential streets. He suggested adding permit parking along Sayre Avenue to eliminate this concern. He also asked the Commissioners to consider limiting hours of operation to earlier than 2:00 AM due to the abutting residential neighborhood.
Chairperson Blonz asked if the question of permit parking would be considered by Public Works. Ms. Heidorn responded that the Village has full jurisdiction over public parking restrictions and that comments from tonight’s meeting will be forwarded to the Village Engineer and Public Works Department for consideration.
Antonio Lacorte of Leading Edge Automotive, 8832 Waukegan Road, commented that his business does not park vehicles on the street. He explained that since Safelite AutoGlass moved into the property north of Greenwood Street, they have regularly allowed employees to park on the street. He stated that his business is not responsible for the on-street parking issues.
No other members of the public came forward to provide comment.
Ms. Heidorn commented that while discussions were occurring, Rick Dobrowski looked up the hours of operation of nearby drive-through He found that Dunking Donuts operates no later than 11:00 PM, McDonald’s operates no later than 12:00 Am, and Culver’s operates no later than 11:00 PM on the weekends. Chairperson Blonz asked the Commissioners to keep these hours of operation in mind.
Chairperson Blonz called for a motion to approve Case PC 20-05.
Plan Commission Motion and Approval Commissioner Kintner moved to approve Case PC 20-05, a motion to recommend approval of a Special Use Permit for a restaurant with a drive-through facility (Taco Bell), pursuant to Section 12-4-3:D of the Morton Gove Unified Development Code for the property commonly known as 8840 Waukegan Road, subject to the following conditions:
1. A minimum of one accessible dedicated pedestrian path shall be provided that connects the building entrances with the public sidewalk system located within public right-of-way. 2. A minimum of one bicycle rack with a minimum short-term storage capacity of four bicycles shall be installed on the property. 3. All delivery service and refuse pick-up serving the use shall occur between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM. 4. Hours of restaurant operation shall be limited to between 7:00 AM and 12:00 AM, specifically aligning with other quick-service restaurant in Morton Grove. No after-hours use of the restaurant is authorized other than for routine cleaning and maintenance. 5. The maximum number of on-site employees at any given time shall be limited to five, except for during shift changes. 6. All employee parking shall occur on the property. 7. Snow storage shall not obstruct sight distances at access points and shall not be located within accessory parking spaces. 8. The site and building shall be developed and operated consistent with the plans and supporting documents in the application, amended, as necessary, to comply with conditions from the Traffic Safety Commission, Plan Commission and/or Village staff, identified in this report and/or presented at the Plan Commission public hearing.
9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall have complied with all recommendations provided by the Traffic Safety Commission in the plan review comment form dated June 5, 2020. 10. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall submit final engineering plans in accordance with Village requirements and standards, for review and approval by the Village Engineer, and shall comply with all recommendations provided by the Village Engineer in the plan review comment form dated June 8, 2020. 11. The Applicant shall advise the Department of Community and Economic Development of any proposed change in ownership or operation of the commercial property. Such changes may subject the owners, lessees, occupants, and users to additional conditions and may serve as the basis for amendment to the Special Use Permit.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Gillespie and approved unanimously pursuant to a roll call vote of 7-0.
CASE: PC 20-06
APPLICANT: Medina Gardens LLC 6037 Lincoln Avenue Morton Grove, IL 60053
LOCATION: 6037 Lincoln Avenue Morton Grove, IL 60053
PETITION: Request for approval of a Map Amendment to zone a portion of the property commonly known as 6037 Lincoln Avenue in Morton Grove, Illinois, specifically Lot 7 and Outlot A of the Medina Gardens Preliminary Plat of Subdivision, within the R3 General Residence District (10-20-122-076-0000)
At the Plan Commission hearing for PC 20-06, Zoe Heidorn, Land Use Planner, provided a brief introduction to the application. The property is currently split zoned R2 single family residence and R3 general residence with the R3 district extending 116 feet south of the northeast corner of the property. The amendment will rezone an additional 5,689 square feet of the subject property from R2 to R3 with the remainder of property remaining in the R2 district. Approval of the amendment will allow for the development of 4 townhomes on Lot 7 and Outlot A as requested in the subdivision application to be heard under case PC 20-07.
Paul Kolpak, Kolpak & Grcic, LLC / Abdul Mohsi, Medina Gardens LLC / Beata Kociuba, BK Architect / Kasia Kociuba, BK Architect / Bernie Bono, Bono Consulting, Inc. / Frank Gallagher, Legacy Designs, Inc. / William Grieve, GHA Engineers were sworn in.
Mr. Kolpak state the request was because of a split lot. The purpose of this development would be for townhomes which are not allowed within the R2 district. Lincoln Avenue is a mixed-use area with a mixture of single-family homes and general residences. There would a buffer of landscaping between Lincoln Avenue and the property and a driveway on the east side. The townhomes will each have a 2-car garage and there will be 4 parking spaces on the east-rear of the property for guests. Both the Appearance and Traffic Safety Commissions have voted unanimously in favor. The applicants believe the proposal is compatible with the current usage in the area and with the comprehensive plan for the Lincoln Avenue corridor.
Chairperson Blonz asked if all testimony could be given at once for both cases PC 20-06 and PC 20-07 with the commission then voting on them separately. Ms. Heidorn stated that was fine.
Chairperson Blonz asked for clarification as to why the application stated that a dead-end street separated this property from a shopping center. Mr. Kolpak stated this was just a comment as a comparison and not in reference to the trend of the development.
Ms. Kociuba then added that there has been a current trend toward townhouses, as this corridor is an ideal location near public transit and the library. The applicant hopes to see this property do very well.
Chairperson Blonz asked for questions or comments from the Commissioners.
Commissioner Dorgan asked if there would be a private drive in front of the town houses. Mr. Kolpak stated that the applicant was working with the village to dedicate the portion of Elm Street and the private drive in front of the townhouses and the village would provide snow removal. Ms. Heidorn confirmed these would be dedicated streets and the village would be responsible for continued maintenance.
Commissioner Dorgan asked what the basis of the detention area would be and if there was any possibility for freezing. Mr. Bono stated that the detention would be underground in a large vault feeding directly from storm drains. Any melted snow would be in the cul-de-sac are and now reach the detention pond. Commissioner Dorgan stated that on the current drawing it appeared landscaping would be in the way of snow removal vehicles. Mr. Bono noted this would be addressed further into the design phase. Ms. Kociuba stated that the drawings the commission was viewing may not have been the most up to date. Mr. Kolpak stated there would be a fee charged to all residents of both the townhome and the single-family homes to maintain the detention area.
Commissioner Dorgan asked how the applicant why the townhome sign needs to be so big for such a small area, especially in comparison to other housing developments in the village. Ms. Kociuba state the applicant can adjust the size of the sign as the village wishes so long as it is visible above landscaping.
Commissioner Dorgan asked if there were any plans for guest parking for the single-family homes. Mr. Kolpak stated the applicant was working with the village engineer on these parking requirements. Mr. Bono added that no parking would be allowed on the cul-de-sac for fire safety.
Commissioner Mohr asked if there was a setback requirement for a driveway. Ms. Heidorn stated it is 3 feet and the applicant is requesting a waiver of the 3 feet for the property located on outlot A. Ms. Kociuba stated the plans showed hypothetical driveway situations and the future homeowners would make these decisions.
Chairperson Blonz asked why these plans were not previously approved. Ms. Kociuba stated originally cluster homes were considered but the current proposal would be a more reasonable use.
Plan Commission Motion and Approval Commissioner Dorgan moved to approve Case PC 20-06, a motion to recommend approval of a Map Amendment to zone a portion of the property commonly known as 6037 Lincoln Avenue in Morton Grove, Illinois, specifically Lot 7 and Outlot A of the Medina Gardens Preliminary Plat of Subdivision, within the R3 General Residence District (10-20-122-076-0000). Commissioner Gabriel seconded. Chairperson Blonz called for the vote. Commissioner Kintner voting aye Commissioner Dorgan voting aye Commissioner Gillespie voting aye Commissioner Gabriel voting no Commissioner Khan voting aye Commissioner Mohr voting aye Chairperson Blonz voting aye
The motion passes.
CASE: PC 20-07
APPLICANT: Medina Gardens LLC 6037 Lincoln Avenue Morton Grove, IL 60053
LOCATION: 6037 Lincoln Avenue Morton Grove, IL 60053 PETITION: Request for approval of a Preliminary Plat of Subdivision to create eight (8) new lots of record for the development of four (4) attached single-family dwellings and six (6) detached single-family dwellings, with waivers to Sections 12-2-5, 12-2-6, and 12-4- 2 for lot width, floor area ratio, front yard, impervious lot and rear yard coverage, and driveway setback, waivers to Section 12-8-4 for lot standards, and waivers to Chapter 12-9 for accessway design, for the property commonly known as 6037 Lincoln Avenue (10-20-122-076- 0000) At the Plan Commission hearing for PC 20-07, Zoe Heidorn, Land Use Planner, provided a brief introduction to the application. Approval of the subdivision as presented must be contingent on approval of the map amendment proposed under PC 20-06. Lots 1-6 will be improved with 6 single family residences. Staff is supportive of the requested waiver due to the pattern of development in the surrounding neighborhood. The six single family homes will be accessed by a cul-de-sac and an extension of Elm Street westward. Outlot A will be improved with 4 townhomes including an access drive and 4 parking areas. Staff notes that a waiver to the three-foot minimum setback of a driveway to a townhome must be granted to allow the site plan as presented.
Chairperson Blonz stated concerns over overflow parking as there is limited place in both the single family and townhome residences if any residents were to have a large gathering. He noted the potential for parking to them spill over onto McVicker. Mr. Grieve stated that both the single-family homes and the townhomes meet code and the applicant feels comfortable that there is available parking.
Chairperson Blonz noted that the traffic study was done three years prior. Mr. Grieve noted that village engineer Chris Tomich stated at the Traffic Safety Commission meeting that this was a reasonable way to look at traffic.
Commissioner Kintner asked if the townhome bylaws could address requirements from the village. Ms. Heidorn stated that this could be added as a condition of approval.
Commissioner Kintner asked if the designated snow storage area could be made into additional parking spaces. Ms. Heidorn stated this could be reviewed further but there may be some limitations. Mr. Bono stated that the design for the center of the cul-de-sac has been changed to open greenspace which could become snow storage allowing for additional parking.
Chairperson Blonz then called for public comment.
Miriam Vochemko of 6045 Elm Street stated the biggest concern for her as the owner of the neighboring property is the limited amount of street parking.
Ron Gannon of 8412 McVicker stated that parking will be a huge problem with the addition of these properties as it is currently vary limited.
Jacob Akgul of 6049 Elm Street stated his agreement with Ms. Vochemko and Mr. Gannon and noted he did not agree with the stated trends of the neighborhood and the proposed single family homes are too close to each other which will create street parking issues.
Janet Porcaro of Elm Street stated there are currently not enough spots in this neighborhood. She asked if a fence would be put up behind the townhomes facing McVicker. She also asked if the proposed properties would have basements, noting that there is an underground spring.
Mr. Kolpak stated that there is no way to not inconvenience neighbors when there is a large gathering and the applicant can only comply with code on the parking issue. Mr. Grieve stated that the cul-de-sac could be reconfigured to allow for more parking.
Commissioner Gabriel asked if there was any consideration to reduce the number of single-family homes from 6 to 4 or to eliminate the cul-de-sac and have Elm Street dead end. Mr. Kolpak stated reducing the number of homes
would create lot sized that were not characteristic of the neighborhood. Mr. Grieve stated the cul-de-sac was part of village staff requests for emergency vehicle clearance.
Rick Dobrowski spoke on behalf of the Fire Prevention Bureau. He stated that anything over 150 feet needs space for a dedicated turnaround and there are several types that are allowed in addition to a cul-de-sac.
Commissioner Gallespie noted that he was concerned about the sight lines as well as the parking issues.
Commissioner Khan stated that the applicants are following village code and being flexible.
Chairperson Blonz called for a motion to continue Case 20-07.
Commissioner Dorgan moved to approve continuation of Case 20-07. Seconded by Commissioner Kintner and approved unanimously pursuant to a roll call vote of 7-0. Chairperson Blonz asked for any other business or discussion. Hearing none, Commissioner Dorgan moved to adjourn the meeting and seconded by Commissioner Gabriel. The motion approved unanimously pursuant to a voice vote at 11:13 pm.
Minutes by: Jacqueline Meracle Village of Morton Grove Department of Community & Economic Development
To: Chairperson Blonz and Members of the Plan Commission
From: Zoe Heidorn, Land Use Planner/Coordinator
Date: June 15, 2020
Re: PC 20-07 – 6037 Lincoln Avenue (10-20-122-076-0000) Request for approval of a Preliminary Plat of Subdivision to create eight (8) new lots of record for the development of four (4) attached single-family dwellings and six (6) detached single-family dwellings, and a Planned Unit Development (PUD) with waivers to Sections 12-2-5, 12-2-6, 12-3-5, and 12-4-2 for lot width, floor area ratio, front yard, impervious lot and rear yard coverage, fencing, and driveway setback, waivers to Section 12-8-4 for lot standards, and waivers to Chapter 12-9 for accessway design, for the property commonly known as 6037 Lincoln Avenue
STAFF REPORT
Continuation of Hearing The Village of Morton Grove provided public notice for the June 15, 2020, Plan Commission public hearing for PC 20-07 in accordance with the Unified Development Code. The Morton Grove Champion published a public notice on May 28, 2020. The Village mailed letters on May 27, 2020, notifying surrounding property owners, and placed a public notice sign on the subject property on May 21, 2020. The mailed letters notified surrounding property owners of the opportunity to attend the June 15 public hearing for PC 20-07 by Zoom as an alternative to in- person attendance, provided due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
At the June 15, 2020, public hearing for PC 20-07, the Plan Commission heard testimony from the Applicant and members of the public. After considering all testimony and discussing the case, the Commissioners voted to continue the hearing to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Plan Commission, to be held on July 20, 2020. The continuation was to provide the Applicant with an opportunity address comments and concerns from the public and members of the Plan Commission.
Due to changes in the submitted applications, the Village of Morton Grove provided a revised public notice for the July 20, 2020, Plan Commission public hearing for PC 20-07 in accordance with the Unified Development Code. The Morton Grove Champion published a public notice on July 2, 2020. The Village mailed letters on June 30, 2020, notifying surrounding property owners. The sign placed on the property in May remains on the property.
A request for a Map Amendment for the same subject property, submitted concurrent to the request for a Subdivision, was reviewed under case PC 20-06 and considered at the same June 15, 2020, Plan Commission hearing. The Commissioners voted to recommend approval of the Map Amendment, but the case has not yet been presented to the Board of Trustees for final approval.
Application Feedback At the June 15, 2020, public hearing, Morton Grove residents and members of the Plan Commission expressed concern with the following aspects of the proposed Medina Gardens development:
Lack of overflow parking for detached single-family lots: The original submitted site plan proposes six single-family lots fronting on an Elm Street cul-de-sac. On-street parking was to be prohibited within the cul-de-sac to allow for unobstructed emergency vehicle access, providing the six single-family residences with no on-street parking facilities. While the homes comply with the off-street parking requirement set PC 20-07 - 6037 Lincoln Avenue July 15, 2020
forth in Section 12-7-3:I of two spaces per dwelling unit, Commissioners and members of the public expressed concern that overflow parking would occur within existing on-street parking spaces along Elm Street. Residents currently rely on these existing on-street parking spaces for personal and guest use, and expressed fear that existing available spaces would be used by new residents and guests associated with the proposed development. Variation of front building lines along Elm Street: The proposed cul-de- sac at the end of Elm Street creates a roadway widening that pushes the lots and buildable areas of the six new single-family lots away from Elm Street, resulting in a significant difference in front building lines between existing properties along Elm Street and the proposed properties along the Elm Street cul-de-sac. Residents of property along Elm Street expressed a desire to see the new single-family homes better align with existing single-family homes along Elm Street. Density of detached single-family development: Some residents and Commissioners expressed concern that the narrow lot widths would result in a higher density than appropriate for the neighborhood. There was Front Building Line Variation disagreement with staff that wider lots would result in larger building (Lot 1 & 6045 Elm) footprints. Desire to consider alternative street configurations for Elm Street: Residents and Commissioners discussed alternative design configurations for Elm Street within the development site. A dead-end street and a connection to Medina Terrace, the private driveway serving the townhome development, were included in the discussion. Application Changes
Original Site Plan for Detached Single-Family Development
Revised Site Plan for Detached Single- Family Development
2 PC 20-07 - 6037 Lincoln Avenue July 15, 2020
Site Design In response to comments and recommendations heard at the June 15, 2020, public hearing, the Applicant submitted a revised plan for the detached single-family development that features the following changes:
The Applicant reduced the number of single-family lots from six lots to five lots. Three narrower single- family lots are proposed to the south of the cul-de-sac and two conforming single-family lots are proposed to the north of the cul-de-sac. The proposed cul-de-sac has been aligned with Elm Street to provide greater roadway symmetry and bring the front building lines of the three southern lots closer in line with the existing front building lines along Elm Street. The elimination of one lot to the north of the cul-de-sac allows for the alignment without jeopardizing the lot areas of Lots 4 and 5. A five-space guest parking area has been added to the east of the cul-de-sac. This area, to be designated as “Outlot B,” will be a privately owned common area to be used and maintained by the homeowners’ association (HOA). Restrictions on duration of use are recommended to ensure the spaces are maintained as temporary guest parking spaces. Staff recommends restrictions on duration of use to ensure the stalls are maintained as temporary guest parking spaces and time of use during the winter months to ensure Village snow removal along Elm Street does not bury parked vehicles. Site Design Alternatives The Applicant and staff reviewed several alternative roadway configurations along Elm Street, as discussed at the June 15 hearing for PC 20-07. The alternatives discussed were as follows:
1. Medina Terrace & Elm Street Connection: The Commissioners and members of the public discussed connecting Medina Terrace and Elm Street. After further review, staff determined that this would be acceptable if Medina Terrace access were to be limited. If 24 feet of unobstructed clearance from Elm Street to Medina Terrace, to Lincoln Avenue could be maintained, a hammerhead or alternative turn- around for emergency vehicles would not be required. The Village would seek public dedication of Elm Street, but require Medina Terrace to be maintained as private property due to its extreme non- conformity with public street standards. An emergency access barrier would be required to be installed to the south of Medina Terrace to allow through emergency vehicle access but prevent public traffic from using Medina Terrace as a through street. The issues that arise with this concept are as follows: a. The townhome guest parking would have to be relocated north, further reducing the amount of permeable surface area within the development site. b. Providing 24 feet of unobstructed clearance along Elm Street will require parking to be limited to one side of Elm Street. At most, only three to four on-street parking spaces could be provided. By contrast, the current proposal includes five dedicated spaces. c. The extended Medina Terrace results in a long stretch of relatively unused paved area. To design Medina Terrace in accordance with public right-of-way standards to allow dedication and through public traffic would require a right-of-way width that renders the northern portion of the site unbuildable. Staff believes that a standard street in this location adds unnecessary public infrastructure and pavement area, demands too large of a portion of the development site area, and provides little tangible benefit to the development and the surrounding neighborhood. Another option that was not discussed at the meeting, but was considered by staff, is connecting Elm Street to Medina Terrace and widening Elm to provide 24 feet of unobstructed clearance and while providing on-street parking on both sides of the street. However, this would not be consistent with the current roadway configuration, would conflict with existing parking currently allowed along Elm, and would likely provide only five or six on-street parking spaces depending on driveway placement.
2. Elm Street Turn-Around Design: The Commissioners and members of the public also discussed terminating Elm Street in a design configuration alternative to the proposed cul-de-sac. Village Code
3 PC 20-07 - 6037 Lincoln Avenue July 15, 2020
establishes four acceptable turn-around configurations suitable for emergency vehicle use. If Elm Street were to terminate in a hammerhead or acceptable alternative (see figure to right), as opposed to the cul-de-sac, parking will still be limited to one side of Elm Street so as to provide emergency vehicles with 24 feet of unobstructed clearance, as required by Code. Staff notes that the stretch of Elm Street just west of the subject property allows for parking on both sides of the street. However, the Fire Department maintains that this is not a desirable situation and would not be supportive Acceptable Turn-Around Designs of new development that mirrors this roadway (Section 12-9-1:B.) configuration. All recent development projects in Morton Grove have been required to provide 24-foot clearance.
In any of the alternative configurations, to provide 24 feet of unobstructed clearance along Elm Street will require that parking is limited to one side Elm Street. At most, only three to four on-street parking spaces could be provided. The current site plan proposes five dedicated spaces.
An alternative design configuration may better align the proposed single-family homes with existing single-family homes along Elm Street. However, the alternatives would result in irregular lot shapes and conflict with driveway access in areas. Staff prefers the cul-de-sac design because it mirrors the existing roadway design, allows for a landscape island that also serves as a snow removal area, and is generally more aesthetically pleasing.
Preliminary Plat of Subdivision The Applicant submitted a new eight-lot preliminary plat of subdivision for the Plan Commission’s consideration. The original plat proposes Lots 1 through 7 and Outlot A, whereas the revised plat proposes Lots 1 through 6 and Outlots A and B. The following table provides an overview of the eight new proposed lots against applicable dimensional controls and assumes the rezoning of Lot 6 (formerly Lot 7) and Outlot A within the R3 District is approved, as recommended for approval by the Plan Commission under PC 20-06. The review was conducted by staff and is based on the submitted preliminary plat of subdivision. Figures provided in the Applicant’s zoning overview tables were found to be erroneous in some areas.
Min. Lot Min. Lot Proposed Proposed Lot Lot Area Compliance Width Lot Compliance Area (12-4-2:D.1) (12-4-2:D.2) Width 5,900 sq. Waiver of 6.16 ft. 1 7,358 sq. ft. Compliant 50 ft. 43.84 ft. ft. requested 5,900 sq. Waiver of 6.16 ft. 2 6,918 sq. ft. Compliant 50 ft. 43.84 ft. ft. requested 5,900 sq. Waiver of 6.16 ft. 3 7,990 sq. ft. Compliant 50 ft. 43.84 ft. ft. requested 5,900 sq. 4 8,110 sq. ft. Compliant 50 ft. 65.81 ft. Compliant ft. 5,900 sq. 5 8,876 sq. ft. Compliant 50 ft. 65.81 ft. Compliant ft. 5,900 sq. 6 6,774 sq. ft. Compliant 50 ft. 54.63 ft. Compliant ft. Outlot 5,900 sq. 10,815 sq. ft. Compliant 50 ft. 81.82 ft. Compliant A ft. Waiver of Outlot 5,900 sq. Waiver of 4.00 ft. 998 sq. ft. 4,902 sq. ft. 50 ft. 46.00 ft. B ft. requested requested
4 PC 20-07 - 6037 Lincoln Avenue July 15, 2020
As shown in the table on the previous page, waivers for lot width are still requested for Lots 1 through 3. Lots 4 and 5 are now compliant as to lot width due to elimination of the sixth single-family lot. Technical waivers are required for Outlot B in order to allow its dedication to the HOA as a shared five-stall parking area. Due to The future maintenance and operation of Lots 1 through 5 and Outlot B will be privately governed by the proposed Medina Gardens Single Family Homeowner Association. The four-unit townhome development will be privately controlled by the Medina Gardens Condominium Association. All townhome and single-family owners will be required to participate in a shared stormwater facility easement and maintenance agreement, which guarantees the future maintenance and operation of stormwater facilities serving the entire Medina Gardens Subdivision.
Section 12-8-4:B requires that all lots abut on a publicly dedicated street. A waiver to this requirement is still requested for Lot 6, which will be improved with townhomes. Access from Lot 6 to Lincoln Avenue will be provided through Outlot A, which will be dedicated to the condominium association for the owners’ use in perpetuity, or until Outlot A and Lot 6 are brought under unified ownership and redeveloped in the future. Any change in the future use of Outlot A will require a new or modified Subdivision Ordinance.
Single-Family Development Review - Zoning Because no physical changes are proposed to the four-unit townhome development on Lot 6 and Outlot A, only a detached single-family development review for Lots 1 through 5 and Outlot B is provided in this staff report. Please refer to the previous staff report for PC 20-07 for a detailed review of the townhome portion of the development.
The Applicant is now proposing the future development of five detached single-family residences on Lots 1 through 5, the designs of which will be finalized by their future buyers. The Applicant continues to request a waiver to the driveway setback requirement for Lots 1 through 3, to be permitted only if the garage door does not face the street. Three new requested waivers will allow for the following:
1) A reduced setback for open accessory parking spaces is requested to allow for a zero-lot-line on Outlot B. 2) Up to 100% impervious coverage of Outlot B is requested to allow zero-lot-line open accessory parking spaces. 3) The approval of 6-foot privacy fencing within front yards for Lots 3 and 5 is requested to allow full screening of open paved areas and single-family residences from abutting property to the east. The installation of fencing along the side lot line of the entire development site will effectively screen all open paved ground surface areas from view of property to the east, as required by Section 12-11-3:B. Staff does not oppose the request for waiver, as six-foot full privacy fences are permitted within the abutting rear yards of property located along McVicker Avenue.
The Applicant plans for the future single-family residences to comply with all other dimensional controls. The following table provides an overview of the proposed detached single-family residential development against applicable dimensional controls.
Dimensional Control Requirement Proposed Compliance
Front Setback (12-4-2:D) Min. 25 ft. ≥ 25 ft. Compliant
Side Setback (12-4-2:D) Min. 5 ft. ≥ 5 ft. Compliant
Rear Setback (12-4-2:D) Min. 30 ft. ≥ 30 ft. Compliant
Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Max. 0.6 ≤ 0.6 Compliant (12-4-2:D)
Total Lot Impervious Coverage Up to 100% impervious Outlot B: Wavier to allow 100% Max. 60% (12-4-2:D) for Outlot B only impervious coverage
Rear Yard Impervious Coverage Max. 50% ≤ 50% Compliant (12-4-2:D)
5 PC 20-07 - 6037 Lincoln Avenue July 15, 2020
Building Height (12-4-2:D) Max. 28 ft. ≤ 28 ft. Compliant
0 ft. to 3 ft. depending Lots 1-3: Waiver of 3 ft. only if Driveway Setback (12-2-6:G) Min. 3 ft. on garage orientation garage door is not oriented to for Lots 1-3 only the street Outlot B: Waiver of 3 ft. to allow Open Accessory Parking Min. 3 ft. ≤ 3 ft. for Outlot B only for zero-lot-line open accessory Setback (12-2-6:G) parking spaces Permitted within 6 ft. privacy fencing Lots 3 & 5: Waiver to allow 6- side and rear Fencing (12-3-5) within front yard for foot privacy fencing within a yards only, up to Lots 3 and 5 only front yard 6 ft. in height
If the variation in front building line is still considered to be problematic, staff recommends that the Plan Commission considers reducing the minimum front yard setback for all lots, or just Lot 1 and 4, to 20 feet with the condition that a rear yard no Lots 1 and 4 with 20-foot Front Yards less than 35 feet must be provided. This will bring future front building lines into closer alignment with existing Elm Street residences.
Single-Family Development Review - Parking The proposed detached single-family dwellings provide two conforming parking spaces within each residence’s attached garage, for a total of ten enclosed off-street parking spaces. While guest parking is not a requirement for single-family detached development, due to comments heard at the June 15 Plan Commission meeting, the Applicant is proposing the construction of five guest parking spaces on Outlot B. These spaces will be maintained by the HOA and limited to use by the guests of subdivision residents. To ensure the spaces are maintained as guest parking spaces, staff recommends limiting the duration of guest parking by incorporating restrictions in the declaration or bylaws and requiring signage. In order to avoid conflict with parked vehicles during snow removal, staff also recommends restricting parking to align with snow route restrictions. Parking restrictions should be subject to final review and approval by the Public Works Department.
Single-Family Development Review – Landscape A revised landscape plan was submitted to reflect the revised site plan. Changes include the preservation of additional trees on Lot 5, the installation of a fence along the eastern lot lines of Lot 3, Lot 5, and Outlot B, and the installation of landscaping to the north and south of the five-stall guest parking area. Because the guest parking area and single-family residences are part of the same development, the landscape screening requirement for parking lots abutting residential uses does not apply.
Lots 1 through 5 will still be required to submit a final landscape plan to the Appearance Commission for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. No changes to the tree preservation plan may be made without prior amendment to the PUD and subdivision ordinance.
Planned Unit Development (PUD) Application Standard subdivisions are intended to support largely by-right development. Based on the quantity of waivers requested to the dimensional requirements of the Unified Development Code for the proposed development, staff determined that the application for PC 20-07 should be amended to request approval of the development as a Planned Unit Development (PUD). PUDs are intended to allow flexibility in the development of land, facilitate the more efficient arrangement of buildings and traffic networks, promote a higher standard of site and building design, and provide for the development of unique land areas and sites that may not otherwise be possible under the strict application of Village requirements. In addition to providing a cleaner mechanism of development approval, a PUD provides the following benefits and protections to the Village:
6 PC 20-07 - 6037 Lincoln Avenue July 15, 2020
The PUD requires unified ownership until all aspects of the approved development are completed. In this case, construction of the townhomes and site improvements must be completed prior to the sale of the individual single-family lots. The ownership of any lots associated with the PUD may not change without express approval of the Village Board until the approved development has been completed. Construction of a development under a PUD permit must commence within twelve months from the date of passage of the authorizing ordinance. If no substantial development has begun or progressed, then the PUD may lapse upon written notice to the Applicant from the Board of Trustees and will be deemed null and void. The Village Board may extend the time for either the commencement of construction or the progression of construction if the PUD is to be constructed in phases in accordance with an approved development and construction schedule. Except as otherwise noted in the application, the PUD will be required to comply with all regulations and standards of site development. No variations may be approved for the detached single-family residences without amendment to the PUD ordinance. In accordance with staff’s determination, the Applicant submitted a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Application as an amendment to the application for PC 20-07. The application is included in the revised hearing packet for PC 20-07. No additional materials are required for a PUD application beyond those that have already been submitted by the Applicant.
Departmental Review The Building Department reviewed the revised application and had no comments to relay to the Plan Commission regarding the proposed development. The Fire Prevention Bureau Coordinator reviewed the revised site plan and stated that the Fire Department supports the plan. The Village Engineer provided a site mock-up and the Fire Department was able to maneuver its quintuple combination pumper, a fire-fighting apparatus, around the proposed cul-de-sac.
The Village Engineer issued 61 comments after review of the revised site plan. These comments are intended to replace the previously issued comments, even though many of the comments are unchanged. These are included in the plan review comment form dated July 10, 2020, which is included as an attachment. A recommended condition of approval is compliance with all comments and recommendations provided by the Village Engineer, whether by strict compliance or alternative compliance, subject to the Village Engineer’s final approval.
Standards for Subdivision Section 12-16-4:D.3 establishes the following standards for evaluating subdivision applications:
12-16-4:D.3. Standards for Subdivisions: The following standards for evaluating subdivisions shall be applied in a reasonable manner, taking into consideration the restrictions and/or limitations which exist for the site being considered for development: a. Orderly Development: The proposed subdivision will encourage orderly and harmonious development within the Village. b. Coordination of Streets: The streets within the proposed subdivision will coordinate with other existing and planned streets within the Village. c. Coordination of Utilities: The utilities within the proposed subdivision will coordinate with existing and planned utilities, and create a uniform system of utilities within the Village. d. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: The proposed subdivision will be evaluated based on its consistency with the overall land use policies of the Village as may be expressed in the Village's comprehensive plan.
The Applicant should be prepared to discuss how they believe the proposed subdivision and development meets the above standards at the public hearing.
Standards for Planned Unit Development (PUD) Section 12-6-4 establishes the following standards for evaluating PUD applications:
7 PC 20-07 - 6037 Lincoln Avenue July 15, 2020
a. Comprehensive Plan: The planned unit development shall be consistent with the general policies of the Village as may be expressed in the comprehensive plan. b. Public Welfare: The planned unit development should be so located, designed, operated and maintained in a manner that will not only protect, but promote the public health, safety, and welfare of the Village. c. Impact On Adjoining Properties: The proposed planned unit development will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of adjoining property and that the exceptions to the underlying district regulations are for the purpose of promoting development which is beneficial to the residents or occupants of the surrounding properties with and adjoining the proposed development. d. Drives, Parking And Circulation: Principal vehicular access to the planned unit development shall be designed to encourage smooth traffic flow with controlled turning movements and minimum hazards to vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Adequate provision should be made to provide ingress and egress in a manner that minimizes traffic congestion in the public streets. e. Impact On Public Facilities: The planned unit development shall be so designed that adequate utilities, road access, drainage, and other necessary facilities will be provided to serve it, and not negatively impact the existing public infrastructure. Surface water in all paved access areas shall be collected in a manner that will not obstruct the flow of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. f. Adequate Buffering And Landscaping: Adequate fencing, screening, and landscaping shall be provided to protect the enjoyment of surrounding properties, or provide for public safety, or to screen parking areas or other visually incompatible uses. The existing landscape should be preserved in its natural state, to the extent as practicable, minimizing tree and soil removal, and any grade changes shall be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed area. g. Integrated Design: The planned unit development shall be laid out and developed as a unit in accordance with an integrated overall design. This design shall provide for safe, efficient, convenient and harmonious groupings of structures, uses, and facilities, including common open space and storm water detention areas, and for appropriate relationship of space between buildings and site. Any common open space shall be integrated into the design in a manner which has a direct or visual relationship to the main building(s) and not be of an isolated or leftover character. h. Appearance: The design of all buildings, structures, and facilities on the site of the planned unit development shall be subject to the approval of the appearance review commission, and shall be of quality as good, if not better, than the surrounding neighborhood. Higher or denser buildings shall be located in such a way as to dissipate any adverse impact on adjoining lower buildings within the development or on surrounding properties. i. Relationship To Adjoining Land And Neighborhood: All planned unit developments shall encourage designs that emphasize accessibility, open views and connections to the larger community as a whole, discouraging new development which may divide neighborhoods and restrict access to adjacent property. In order to achieve this objective, the design of lots, streets, sidewalks, and accessways within the planned unit development, the continuation of such existing or proposed features to adjoining areas shall be encouraged. When a proposed planned unit development adjoins land susceptible of being subdivided, resubdivided, or redeveloped, new streets, sidewalks, and accessways may be carried to the boundaries of the proposed planned unit development. Recommendation After review of the application, staff report, and as a result of the testimony, should the Plan Commission recommend approval of this application, staff suggests the following initial motion and conditions:
Motion to recommend approval of a PC 20-07, a request for approval of a Preliminary Plat of Subdivision to create eight (8) new lots of record for the development of four (4) attached single-family dwellings and six (6) detached single-family dwellings, and a Planned Unit Development (PUD) with waivers to Sections 12-2-5, 12-2-6, 12-3-5, and 12-4-2 for lot width, floor area ratio, front yard, impervious lot and rear yard coverage, fencing, and driveway setback, waivers to Section 12-8-4 for lot standards, and
8 PC 20-07 - 6037 Lincoln Avenue July 15, 2020 waivers to Chapter 12-9 for accessway design, for the property commonly known as 6037 Lincoln Avenue (10-20-122-076-0000), subject to the following conditions:
1. Approval of the preliminary plat of subdivision shall be contingent on approval of the proposed map amendment for the subject property, presented as Case PC 20-06. 2. Parking shall be prohibited within the cul-de-sac and Medina Terrace access drive. 3. Parking within Outlot B shall be limited to temporary and guest parking only, and shall be limited by time and duration as established by the HOA declaration/bylaws and noticed by corresponding signage. Temporary and guest parking restrictions shall be subject to final review and approval by the Village Engineer and Director of Public Works. 4. Prior to the removal of any tree on the property included in the tree survey, the Village shall work with the Applicant to mark each tree authorized for removal prior to its removal. All tree markings must be made prior to issuance of a sitework permit. 5. Deciduous trees designated for preservation which are removed, destroyed, or severely damaged, other than by natural forces or events, shall be replaced with a new tree at a rate of three inches (3") in caliper to each one inch (1") of removed tree. Coniferous trees designated for preservation which are removed, destroyed, or severely damaged, other than by natural forces or events, shall be replaced with a new tree at a rate of three (3) vertical feet for each one foot of removed tree. All fractions of an inch shall be rounded up. In the event that no appropriate planting location for a replacement tree can be identified on the property, the Village Administrator may approve alternative planting locations on private or public property, with preference given to locations closest in proximity to the development. Species of replacement trees shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. 6. Final building elevations, materials, and a landscape plan shall be required for the future development of Lots 1 through 5, and an Appearance Certificate shall be granted by the Appearance Commission prior to the issuance of a building permit. 7. The site and buildings shall be developed and operated consistent with the plans and supporting documents in the application, amended, as necessary, to comply with conditions from the Traffic Safety Commission, Plan Commission and/or Village staff, identified in this report and/or presented at the Plan Commission public hearing. 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall have complied with all recommendations provided by the Traffic Safety Commission in the plan review comment form dated June 5, 2020. 9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall submit final engineering plans in accordance with Village requirements and standards, for review and approval by the Village Engineer, and shall comply with all recommendations provided by the Village Engineer in the plan review comment form dated July 10, 2020. 10. The Applicant shall advise the Department of Community and Economic Development of any proposed change in ownership or operation of the commercial property. Such changes may subject the owners, lessees, occupants, and users to additional conditions and may serve as the basis for amendment to the Special Use Permit. 11. Within one year after receiving the approval of the preliminary plat by the Village Board of Trustees, or any such extension of time, the Applicant shall submit a final plat substantially conforming to the approved preliminary plat, together with the supporting documentation. 12. The subdivision shall be recorded in accordance with all materials submitted with the subdivision application and in accordance with the requirements of Title 12, Chapter 8. 13. The planned unit development shall be recorded with all materials submitted with the planned unit development application and in accordance with the requirements of Section 12-6-6. 14. (Any additional conditions recommended by the Plan Commission)
9
REVIEWING: BUILDING FIRE POLICE PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING TSC
VILLAGE OF MORTON GROVE, ILLINOIS PLAN REVIEW COMMENT FORM
DATE DISTRIBUTED: 6/24/2020
CASE NUMBER: PC 20-06 & PC 20-07
APPLICATION: Medina Gardens, LLC, is requesting approval of a Map Amendment (PC 20-06) to zone Lot 7 and Outlot A of the Medina Gardens Preliminary Plat of Subdivision within the R3 General Residence District and approval of a Preliminary Plat of Subdivision (PC 20-07) to divide the subject property into eight (8) new lots of record for the development of four (4) attached single-family dwellings and six (6) detached single-family dwellings, with waivers to lot width, floor area ratio, impervious lot and rear yard coverage, and driveway setback. The property is zoned in the R3 General Residence District and R2 Single Family Residence District, and is commonly known as 6037 Lincoln Avenue in Morton Grove, Illinois.
A Map Amendment and Subdivision Application have been submitted for Plan Commission action. Please return your review to the Department of Community Development by Friday, July 10, 2020. Thank you, Zoe Heidorn, Land Use Planner
COMMENTS OR CONCERNS
PLAN COMMISSION – REVISED PLAN 1. PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN AND GEOMTRIC PLAN was submitted on June 24, 2020 and supersedes the same plan originally submitted with the Plan Commission application. PLAT OF SURVEY / PRELIMINARY PLAT 2. There is a discrepancy on Plat of Survey site dimensions when compared roughly to the Sidwell Maps. a. The north property line is estimated to be 88 feet on Sidwell Maps and is labeled 81.82 feet on the plat. b. The recorded distance of Lot 32 (abutting the west property line) is 88.56 feet on the Sidwell Maps and is labeled as 88.50 feet on the plat. c. The recorded distance of Lot 32 (abutting the west property line) is 88 feet on the Sidwell Maps and is labeled as 87 feet on the plat. 3. Label the excepted parcels on the Plat of Survey and Preliminary Plat of Subdivision (e.g. “NOT INCLUDED”), so the areas are easier to verify. 4. Revise label on Preliminary Plat of Subdivision Page 1 of 2 to read, “Preliminary Plat of Subdivision Medina Gardens”. 5. Modify Area Table on Preliminary Plat of Subdivision Page 1 of 2 to revise “Dedication” to “ROW” and “Outlot B” to “Outlot A”. 6. Add field work date to Surveyor’s Certificate to Preliminary Plat of Subdivision Page 2 of 2 as required by Plat Act. 7. Add Operation and Maintenance General Practice Notes section on Preliminary Plat of Subdivision Page 2 fo 2 that will be poplulated after MWRD WMO permit is approved. 8. Add Engineer’s Acceptance Certificate to Preliminary Plat of Subdivision Page 2 of 2 9. Add Covenants and Declarations Certificate to Preliminary Plat of Subdivision Page 2 of 2. 10. Add Protective Covenant to Preliminary Plat of Subdivision Page 2 of 2: “Without prior written consent of the Village of Morton Grove, no lot owner shall take nor permit any action with respect to such owner's lot, the effect of which shall affect the drainage of water pursuant to the drainage plan approved by the Village of Morton Grove.”
13. Revise Village Finance Director’s Certificate to Village Clerk’s Certificate to Preliminary Plat of Subdivision Page 2 of 2. 14. Add names and addresses of owner of Medina Gardens LLC to Preliminary Plat of Subdivision. Page 2 of 2 15. The north point needs to reference true north on Preliminary Plat of Subdivision Page 1 of 2. 16. Add the approximate acreage of the subdivision. TRAFFIC STUDY 17. Recommendations; Site Access Medina Terrace: It is anticipated that on-street parking would need to be prohibited on the south side of Lincoln Avenue between the south leg of Morton Avenue and McVicker Avenue, removing approximately eight parking spaces. Village staff is aware there is high demand for parking along the Lincoln Avenue corridor. Intersection sight distance studies and other supporting evidence should be provided to support the removal of any parking. 18. Appropriate site distance studies should be provided at Lincoln Avenue with the landscaping plan. PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN & GEOMETRIC PLAN 19. Comments below are based on PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN AND GEOMTRIC PLAN was submitted on June 24, 2020. 20. The village desires significant changes to the cul-de-sac layout to decrease the impervious area. d. The location and width of sidewalk is acceptable and may remain as proposed. e. The distance between the curb and gutter should not be less than 3 feet and, based upon ordinary elevation differences should not be less than 5 feet. f. The width from the face of the curb to the edge of the island should not be less than 24 feet. g. The cul-de-sac center island should include a flush 2-foot concrete section to stabilize the asphalt pavement edge. Alternatively, concrete pavement could be constructed at the developer’s option. h. This layout is predicated upon having no-on-street parking on the outside perimeter of the cul-de-sac. i. The drainage pattern of the cul-de-sac right-of-way should be changed to direct runoff toward the center of the cul-de-sac. Drainage structures will need to be install in the concrete section in order to provide wintertime drainage collection points as well as at least one structure to drain the center median. j. The village desires the property owners (or homeowner’s association) maintain the center island and wants this commitment to be included in the recorded declarations. 21. Design plans will need to include 2-1/4-inch hot-mix asphalt binder course for standard duty pavement. 22. The alignment of townhome driveway approach to Lincoln Avenue is skewed and the purpose of the skew is not addressed in the application. If the offset is needed, there may be other options that provide a more intuitive guidance for users than what is proposed. 23. The feasibility of lot dimensions has been evaluated for compatibility with required utilities for the subdivision and have been found to not be compatible. The village desires no less than 5 feet of on either side of an existing or a proposed village utility. The village desires at least 10 feet of separation from a building and a water main. If the storm water storage facility remains as originally proposed relative to Lots 4 & 5, then it is anticipated the runoff from the south end of the subdivision would be routed to the storm water detention facility between Lots 4 & 5 and the discharge from the storm water detention facility would be routed to the village’s storm sewer between Lots 4 & 5. The village requires the water main to be separated from the storm water detention facility. It is anticipated the only available location to align the water main would be between Lot 5 and the property line. Based on these assumptions, we offer the following suggestions. a. There should be at least a 10-foot utility and drainage easement between Lots 4 & 5. b. There should be at least a 15-foot utility and drainage easement between Lot 5 and the property line. TREE IDENTIFICATION SURVEY AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 24. Design plans will need to include pre-developed and post-developed erosion control measures conforming to IEPA requirements and Municipal Code Chapter 7-10. 25. Disturbance area will require MWRD and IEPA permit for erosion control. PRELIMINARY STORM WATER MANAGEMENT, UTILITY, AND GRADING PLAN Storm water Comments 26. It is recognized the proposed drainage plan lacks detail. This is acceptable to the extent that it is understood the engineer has performed a feasibility analysis for the proposed drainage plan to ensure the storage and conveyance sizing is appropriate and that the alignment includes reasonable flexibility during the plan approval process. More information will be required before plan approval can be issued and design plans can be developed. 27. Disturbance area will require MWRD permit for volume control.
PRELIMINARY STORM WATER MANAGEMENT, UTILITY, AND GRADING PLAN Storm water Comments 26. It is recognized the proposed drainage plan lacks detail. This is acceptable to the extent that it is understood the engineer has performed a feasibility analysis for the proposed drainage plan to ensure the storage and conveyance sizing is appropriate and that the alignment includes reasonable flexibility during the plan approval process. More information will be required before plan approval can be issued and design plans can be developed. 27. Disturbance area will require MWRD permit for volume control. 28. A drainage area exhibit needs to be provided that supports the hydrologic calculations. The existing contours show the drainage from the properties in Mohan Subdivision to the east naturally flows onto the existing parcel. Contour information shared with the development team indicates residential development to the west drains onto the existing parcel via a depressional storage area (discussed with BCI). These areas and any others draining onto this site needs to be shown on a drainage area exhibit. 29. Submit structure and pipe information for all proposed drainage work, along with hydrologic and hydraulic sewer flow calculations showing design criteria. Several structures and pipes are not labeled. 30. Proposed drainage and water structure symbols look similar. Differentiate with new symbol. Unclear whether dark arrows are overland flow paths. Add a legend. 31. Proposed control structure is shown in the proposed right-of-way area and also consolidates many different sewers. It is not acceptable to have the control structure in the right-of-way. 32. Submit volume control and detention calculations and supporting documentation for the storm water management summary volumes shown. These need to include but not be limited to the release rate and restrictor flow calculations. The calculations must show how depressional storage area volume and 100-year water surface elevation in the detention system were calculated. 33. Hydraulic calculations are needed to show the 100-year water surface elevation does not surcharge open lid structures upstream of restrictor manhole and required freeboard is achieved. 34. Hydraulic calculations should include stage-storage information and detail for underground detention tank from manufacturer showing that all live storage is used. 35. The village desires all proposed storm sewer drainage is directed through the detention basin. 36. Storm sewer located less than 10 feet from a building should be include water-tight construction materials. 37. Angled storm sewers behind lots 1 and 3 are located outside of the easements. Either the storm sewer alignment will need to change or plat of subdivision needs to change. 38. Existing drain flow directions east of development area are unclear. CB-12, for example, has a sewer coming from the west but no connecting structure. Show how existing infrastructure is connected. 39. It is noted that runoff from the east is directed toward the buildings on Lots 3 and 6. The proposed swale is the minimum required. Special consideration should be provided to assess whether additional measures should be provided to protect the building from storm water damages. 40. Submit a control structure detail showing restrictor type, all incoming and outgoing pipes, and restrictor calculations with labeled elevations. 41. Design plans will need to include clearer representation of proposed grading and drainage patterns. Existing spot grades are overlaid on development. Proposed grading needs to clearly show that open grate structures will capture all tributary flow and are not on grade. 42. Design plans will need to add drainage structure where sewers change direction instead of a bend. 43. Design plans should revise the open grate structure located along the interface of a pervious and impervious surface, such as a driveway away from the impervious surface. Presence of water due to the structure could cause erosion along the pavement edge in the long term. 44. There appears to be two locations where overland concentrated flow enters what may be an open lid structure on top of the detention tank. Design plans should consider having overland flow enter a catch basin prior to the structure to settle out any sediment before entering basin in order to reduce maintain within the detention tank.
S 89°12'39" W 131.53' W 89°12'39" S
7,357 SF. 7,357 6,918 SF. 6,918
7,990 SF. 7,990
10,153 SF. 10,153 N 00°00'55" W 383.95'
FOR PUBLIC STREET PUBLIC FOR
OF MORTON GROVE MORTON OF DEDICATED TO VILLAGE TO DEDICATED 4 TOWNHOUSES PUD ELIGIBILITY IMPERVIOUS LOT DEVELOPMENT AT CONTROL LOT SIZE FOR DIMENSION OPEN SPACE
RESIDENTIAL 997 SF. COVERAGE COVERAGE MAXIMUM MAXIMUM DENSITY ZONING OVERALL ANALYSIS PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS LOT 6 & OUTLOT A USE 5 LOT LOT NO. PROPOSED SUBDIVIDED LOTS CUL-DE-SAC TOTAL OUTLOT B LOT 5 LOT 4 LOT 3 LOT 2 LOT 1
S 00°00'00" E 600.07' (M) 600.30' (R) 2 SPACES PER 1 DWELLING 2 SPACES PER 1 DWELLING 1 ACRE MINIMUM PURCHASED. BUILDING SHOWN ARE EXACT BUILDING FOOT PRINT FOR LOT 1, 2, 3, 4, (Sec.12-6-3 ) CONCEPTUAL PLANS. & 5 TO BE DETERMINED ONCE LOTS ARE REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENTS ORDINANCE UNIT UNIT 65% MAXIMUM 35% MINIMUM AREA SQ. FT. / 67,988.95 10,153 17,588 8,876 8,109 7,990 6,918 7,357 997 TOTAL REQUIRED: 18 SPACES / / / / / / / / / ACRE 5 x 2= 10 SPACES 4 x 2= 8 SPACES PARKING DEMAND 1.561 0.233 0.023 0.404 0.204 0.186 0.183 0.159 0.169 ...... CALCULATED 4 TOWNHOUSES plus 9 DWELLING UNIT PER 1 ACRE
38.90% 61.10%
1.56081 acres
PROPOSED
8,109 SF. 8,109 8,876 SF. 8,876 TOTAL PROPOSED: 32 SPACES TOWNHOUSE PROPOSAL POARKING PROVIDED 10 VISITOR SPACES 10 GARAGE SPACES MEDINA GARDENS 4 VISITOR SPACES 8 GARAGE SPACES 5 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES No of UNITS / LOT
9 4 1 1 1 1 1 - - N 89°59'05" E 50.01' E 89°59'05" N MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS LOT AREA 7,357 sq.ft. LOT AREA 6,918 sq.ft. MAX. BUILDING MAX. BUILDING DIMENSIONAL DIMENSIONAL MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT REAR YARD REAR YARD MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) FRONT YARD FRONT YARD COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY REAR YARD REAR YARD SIDEYARD SIDEYARD ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #1 (R2) EACH SIDE EACH SIDE SETBACK SETBACK CONTROL CONTROL SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK HEIGHT HEIGHT WIDTH WIDTH AREA AREA ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #2 PROPOSED PROPOSED MAX 28 FT MAX 28 FT 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH MAX 60 % MAX 50 % MIN 30 FT MAX 60 % MAX 50 % MIN 30 FT 25 FT 25 FT 43.84 FT 43.84 FT 6,918 SQ.FT. 7,357 SQ.FT. 0 FT 0 FT
N 00°00'55" W 213.00' (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH 5,900 SQ.FT. 5,900 SQ.FT. PER 1 INIT PER 1 INIT REQUIRED REQUIRED 30 FT 30 FT 3 FT 3 FT 50 FT 50 FT 28 FT 25 FT 28 FT 25 FT 60% 50% 60% 50% (0.159 ACRES) (0.169 ACRES) N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant
Waiver of 6.16' Waiver of 6.16'
Waiver of 3' Waiver of 3' REQUEST FOR LOT #2 REQUEST FOR LOT #2 WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ 6,774.12 SF. 6,774.12
10,105 SF. T/F 628.75 T/F MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS LOT AREA 8,109 sq.ft. LOT AREA 7,990 sq.ft. MAX. BUILDING MAX. BUILDING DIMENSIONAL DIMENSIONAL MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT REAR YARD REAR YARD MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) FRONT YARD FRONT YARD COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY REAR YARD REAR YARD SIDEYARD SIDEYARD EACH SIDE EACH SIDE SETBACK SETBACK CONTROL CONTROL SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK HEIGHT HEIGHT
WIDTH WIDTH
AREA AREA ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #4 ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #3 PROPOSED PROPOSED 81.82' E 86°33'14" N 8,109 SQ.FT. MAX 28 FT MAX 28 FT 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH MAX 60 % MAX 50 % MIN 30 FT MAX 60 % MAX 50 % MIN 30 FT 25 FT 25 FT 43.84 FT 7,990 SQ.FT.
0 FT 0 FT 65 FT LINCOLN AVENUE LINCOLN (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH
5,900 SQ.FT. 5,900 SQ.FT. PER 1 INIT PER 1 INIT
REQUIRED REQUIRED 30 FT 30 FT 3 FT 3 FT 50 FT 50 FT 28 FT 25 FT 28 FT 25 FT 60% 50% 60% 50% (0.186 ACRES) (0.183 ACRES) N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N N/A - compliant Waiver of 6.16' Waiver of 3' Waiver of 3' REQUEST FOR LOT #2 REQUEST FOR LOT #2 WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #6 & OUTLOT A (R3) ( 4-UNIT TOWNHOUSE BUILDING) MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS LOT AREA 8,876 sq.ft. MAX. BUILDING DIMENSIONAL MINIMUM LOT FRONT YARD MAX. BUILDING FLOOR AREA REAR YARD IMPERVIOUS SIDE (WEST) DIMENSIONAL MINIMUM LOT COVERAGE SIDE (EAST) REAR YARD REAR YARD MINIMUM LOT (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) FRONT YARD COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE CONTROL MAXIMUM PERMITTED DRIVEWAY REAR YARD SIDEYARD EACH SIDE SETBACK CONTROL SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK DENSITY HEIGHT SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK WIDTH LOT AREA 17,588 sq.ft. ( 0.404 acres) HEIGHT WIDTH AREA ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #5 0.652(11460 SF) 27.6 FT 13.6 FT PROPOSED 0.404 acres lot 69.8 FT PROPOSED 4 units on 20 FT MAX 28 FT 81.61 FT 5 FT EACH MAX 60 % MAX 50 % MIN 30 FT 25 FT 30 FT 8,876 SQ.FT. 51.84 % 73.73 % 0 FT 65 FT 16 units per acre (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 0.6 (10,553 SF) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 5 FT EACH 5,900 SQ.FT. REQUIRED PER 1 INIT 60 FT REQUIRED 35 FT 30 FT 25 FT 30 FT 50% 65% 3 FT 50 FT 28 FT 25 FT 5 FT 5 FT 60% 50% (0.204 ACRES) N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant Waiver of 907 SF N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant Waiver of 1.84% Waiver of 8.73% REQUEST FOR LOT #1 WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ Waiver of 3' REQUEST FOR LOT #2 WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ Waiver of 5' 14 PROJECT NUMBER: REPRODUCED, MODIFIED OR SOLD EITHER SCALE: START DATE: COPYRIGHT: AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER. WHOLLY OR IN PART, EXCEPT WHEN THIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE USED, PROJECT STAFF ISSUE REVISIONS DATE
PROJECT MANAGER: B. BONO P.E. 1A PRELIMINARY PLAN 12-10-2018 SHEET NUMBER
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN & GEOMETRIC PLAN ENGINEER: A. VEER P.E. 1A PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW 08-30-2019
B C I ENGINEER: W. HEPBURN 1B PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW 05-11-2019 OF BONO CONSULTING, INC. TECHNICIAN: 1C PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW 06-24-2020
JUN. 10, 2017 CIVIL ENGINEERS MEDINA GARDENS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 1"=30'-0 1018 BUSSE HIGHWAY PH : (847) 823-3300 - 17239 6021-6037 LINCOLN, MORTON GROVE, COOK COUNTY, IL PARK RIDGE, IL 60068 FAX: (847) 823-3303 [email protected] PC 20-07 06/24/2020
6037 Lincoln Avenue
See attached APPLICANT’S REQUEST (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NECESSARY):
1. Applicant is requesting a PUD (Planned Unit Development) permit for the following: ______, which is being requested as a PUD (Planned Unit Development) in the ______zoning district of the Village of Morton Grove.
2. Provide responses to the Performance Standards for PUD (Planned Unit Development) as listed in Section 12-6-4 of the Village of Morton Grove Unified Development Code. The applicant must present this information for the official record of the Zoning & Planning Commission. The PUD (Planned Unit Development) Performance standards are as follows: a. Comprehensive Plan: The planned unit development shall be consistent with the general policies of the village as may be expressed in the comprehensive plan; ______b. Public Welfare: The planned unit development should be so located, designed, operated and maintained in a manner that will not only protect, but promote the public health, safety, and welfare of the village; ______c. Impact On Adjoining Properties: The proposed planned unit development will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of adjoining property and that the exceptions to the underlying district regulations are for the purpose of promoting development which is beneficial to the residents or occupants of the surrounding properties with and adjoining the proposed development; ______d. Drives, Parking and Circulation: Principal vehicular access to the planned unit development shall be designed to encourage smooth traffic flow with controlled turning movements and minimum hazards to vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Adequate provision should be made to provide ingress and egress in a manner that minimizes traffic congestion in the public streets; ______e. Impact on Public Facilities: The planned unit development shall be so designed that adequate utilities, road access, drainage, and other necessary facilities will be provided to serve it, and not negatively impact the existing public infrastructure. Surface water in all paved access areas shall be collected in a manner that will not obstruct the flow of vehicular and pedestrian traffic; ______f. Adequate Buffering and Landscaping: Adequate fencing, screening, and landscaping shall be provided to protect the enjoyment of surrounding properties, or provide for public safety, or to screen parking areas or other visually incompatible uses. The existing landscape should be preserved in its natural state, to the extent as practicable, minimizing tree and soil removal, and any grade changes shall be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed area; ______g. Integrated Design: The planned unit development shall be laid out and developed as a unit in accordance with an integrated overall design. This design shall provide for safe, efficient, convenient and harmonious groupings of structures, uses, and facilities, including common open space and storm water detention areas, and for appropriate relationship of space between buildings and site. Any common open space shall be integrated into the design in a manner which has a direct or visual relationship to the main building(s) and not be of an isolated or leftover character; ______h. Appearance: The design of all buildings, structures, and facilities on the site of the planned unit development shall be subject to the approval of the appearance review commission, and shall be of quality as good, if not better, than the surrounding neighborhood. Higher or denser buildings shall be located in such a way as to dissipate any adverse impact on adjoining lower buildings within the development or on surrounding properties; ______i. Relationship to Adjoining Land and Neighborhood: All planned unit developments shall encourage designs that emphasize accessibility, open views and connections to the larger community as a whole, discouraging new development which may divide neighborhoods and restrict access to adjacent property. In order to achieve this objective, the design of lots, streets, sidewalks, and access ways within the planned unit development, the continuation of such existing or proposed features to adjoining areas shall be encouraged. When a proposed planned unit development adjoins land susceptible of being subdivided, resubdivided, or redeveloped, new streets, sidewalks, and access ways may be carried to the boundaries of the proposed planned unit development. ______
6021-6037 LINCOLN, MORTON GROVE, COOK COUNTY, IL COUNTY, COOK GROVE, MORTON LINCOLN, 6021-6037
PARK RIDGE, IL 60068 IL RIDGE, PARK (847) 823-3303 (847) FAX:
17239 - 1018 BUSSE HIGHWAY BUSSE 1018 PH : (847) 823-3300 (847) : PH
1"=30'-0 MEDINA GARDENS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLANNED GARDENS MEDINA
CIVIL ENGINEERS CIVIL
JUN. 10, 2017
PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW VILLAGE FOR PLAN PRELIMINARY 1C 06-24-2020 BONO CONSULTING, INC. CONSULTING, BONO TECHNICIAN: OF
I B
1B C PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW VILLAGE FOR PLAN PRELIMINARY 05-11-2019 W. HEPBURN W.
ENGINEER:
PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW VILLAGE FOR PLAN PRELIMINARY 1A 08-30-2019 A. VEER P.E. VEER A. PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN & GEOMETRIC PLAN GEOMETRIC & PLAN SITE PRELIMINARY ENGINEER:
SHEET NUMBER
PRELIMINARY PLAN PRELIMINARY 1A 12-10-2018 B. BONO P.E. BONO B. PROJECT MANAGER: PROJECT
REVISIONS ISSUE STAFF PROJECT DATE THIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE USED, WHOLLY OR IN PART, EXCEPT WHEN AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER. COPYRIGHT: START DATE: SCALE: REPRODUCED, MODIFIED OR SOLD EITHER PROJECT NUMBER: 14 Waiver of 5' WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ REQUEST FOR LOT #2 Waiver of 3' WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ REQUEST FOR LOT #1 Waiver of 8.73% Waiver of 1.84% N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant Waiver of 907 SF N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant (0.204 ACRES) 50% 60% 5 FT 5 FT 28 FT 25 FT 50 FT 3 FT 65% 50% 30 FT 35 FT 30 FT 25 FT 60 FT REQUIRED PER 1 INIT REQUIRED 5,900 SQ.FT. 5 FT EACH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 0.6 (10,553 SF) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 16 units per acre 65 FT 0 FT 73.73 % 51.84 % 8,876 SQ.FT. 30 FT 25 FT MAX 60 % MIN 30 FT MAX 50 % 5 FT EACH 81.61 FT MAX 28 FT 20 FT 4 units on PROPOSED 69.8 FT 0.404 acres lot PROPOSED 13.6 FT 27.6 FT 0.652(11460 SF) ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #5 AREA WIDTH HEIGHT WIDTH LOT AREA 17,588 sq.ft. ( 0.404 acres) SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK HEIGHT DENSITY SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK CONTROL SETBACK EACH SIDE SIDEYARD REAR YARD PERMITTED DRIVEWAY MAXIMUM CONTROL
COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE FRONT YARD (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) MINIMUM LOT REAR YARD REAR YARD SIDE (EAST) COVERAGE MINIMUM LOT SIDE (WEST) DIMENSIONAL IMPERVIOUS REAR YARD FLOOR AREA MAX. BUILDING FRONT YARD MINIMUM LOT
DIMENSIONAL MAX. BUILDING LOT AREA 8,876 sq.ft.
MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS [email protected]
( 4-UNIT TOWNHOUSE BUILDING) IL COUNTY, COOK GROVE, MORTON LINCOLN, 6021-6037
ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #6 & OUTLOT A (R3) PARK RIDGE, IL 60068 IL RIDGE, PARK (847) 823-3303 (847) FAX:
17239 - 1018 BUSSE HIGHWAY BUSSE 1018 PH : (847) 823-3300 (847) : PH
1"=30'-0 MEDINA GARDENS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLANNED GARDENS MEDINA
CIVIL ENGINEERS CIVIL
JUN. 10, 2017
PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW VILLAGE FOR PLAN PRELIMINARY 1C 06-24-2020 BONO CONSULTING, INC. CONSULTING, BONO TECHNICIAN: OF
I B
1B C PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW VILLAGE FOR PLAN PRELIMINARY 05-11-2019 W. HEPBURN W.
ENGINEER:
PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW VILLAGE FOR PLAN PRELIMINARY 1A
08-30-2019 A. VEER P.E. VEER A.
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN & GEOMETRIC PLAN GEOMETRIC & PLAN SITE PRELIMINARY ENGINEER:
[email protected] SHEET NUMBER
PRELIMINARY PLAN PRELIMINARY 1A
12-10-2018 6021-6037 LINCOLN, MORTON GROVE, COOK COUNTY, IL COUNTY, COOK GROVE, MORTON LINCOLN, 6021-6037 B. BONO P.E. BONO B. PROJECT MANAGER: PROJECT
PARK RIDGE, IL 60068 IL RIDGE, PARK (847) 823-3303 (847) FAX:
17239
- 1018 BUSSE HIGHWAY BUSSE 1018 PH : (847) 823-3300 (847) : PH
REVISIONS ISSUE STAFF PROJECT DATE 1"=30'-0 WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ DEVELOPMENT PLANNED GARDENS MEDINA WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ REQUEST FOR LOT #2 REQUEST FOR LOT #2 Waiver of 3' Waiver of 3' THIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE USED, WHOLLY OR IN PART, EXCEPT WHEN AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER. COPYRIGHT: START DATE: SCALE: REPRODUCED, MODIFIED OR SOLD EITHER Waiver of 6.16' PROJECT NUMBER: N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant
N 14 CIVIL ENGINEERS CIVIL
JUN. 10, 2017
BONO CONSULTING, INC. CONSULTING, BONO TECHNICIAN: (0.183 ACRES) (0.186 ACRES) 60% 50% 60% 50% 28 FT 25 FT 28 FT 25 FT 50 FT 50 FT 3 FT 3 FT OF
30 FT 30 FT REQUIRED REQUIRED
PER 1 INIT PER 1 INIT I B
1B C 5,900 SQ.FT. 5,900 SQ.FT. PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW VILLAGE FOR PLAN PRELIMINARY 05-11-2019
W. HEPBURN W.
ENGINEER: 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D)
PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW VILLAGE FOR PLAN PRELIMINARY 1A 08-30-2019 A. VEER P.E. VEER A. PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN & GEOMETRIC PLAN GEOMETRIC & PLAN SITE PRELIMINARY ENGINEER:
SHEET NUMBER PRELIMINARY PLAN PRELIMINARY 1A 12-10-2018
B. BONO P.E. BONO B. LINCOLN AVENUEMANAGER: PROJECT 65 FT 0 FT 0 FT
7,990 SQ.FT. 43.84 FT 25 FT 25 FT MAX 60 % MIN 30 FT MAX 50 % MAX 60 % MIN 30 FT MAX 50 %
5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH
MAX 28 FT MAX 28 FT 8,109 SQ.FT.
PROPOSED PROPOSED REVISIONS ISSUE STAFF PROJECT DATE N 86°33'14" E 81.82' THIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE USED, WHOLLY OR IN PART, EXCEPT WHEN AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER. COPYRIGHT: START DATE: SCALE: REPRODUCED, MODIFIED OR SOLD EITHER PROJECT NUMBER: 14 ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #3 ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #4 AREA AREA WIDTH WIDTH HEIGHT HEIGHT SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK CONTROL CONTROL SETBACK SETBACK EACH SIDE EACH SIDE SIDEYARD SIDEYARD REAR YARD REAR YARD DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE FRONT YARD FRONT YARD (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT REAR YARD REAR YARD MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONAL DIMENSIONAL MAX. BUILDING MAX. BUILDING LOT AREA 7,990 sq.ft. LOT AREA 8,109 sq.ft. MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS Waiver of 5' WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ REQUEST FOR LOT #2 Waiver of 3' WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ T/F 628.75 REQUEST FOR LOT #1 Waiver of 8.73% Waiver of 1.84% N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant Waiver of 907 SF
N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant 10,105 SF. 10,105
6,774.12 SF. WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ REQUEST FOR LOT #2 REQUEST FOR LOT #2 Waiver of 3' Waiver of 3' (0.204 ACRES) 60% 50% 5 FT 5 FT 25 FT 28 FT 50 FT Waiver of 6.16' Waiver of 6.16' 3 FT 50% 65% N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant 30 FT 35 FT 30 FT 25 FT 60 FT REQUIRED PER 1 INIT REQUIRED 5,900 SQ.FT. 5 FT EACH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 0.6 (10,553 SF) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 16 units per acre (0.169 ACRES) (0.159 ACRES) 50% 60% 50% 60% 28 FT 25 FT 28 FT 25 FT 50 FT 50 FT 3 FT 3 FT 30 FT 30 FT REQUIRED REQUIRED PER 1 INIT PER 1 INIT Waiver of 5' 5,900 SQ.FT. 5,900 SQ.FT. WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ REQUEST FOR LOT #2 REQUEST FOR LOT #2 Waiver of 3' Waiver of 3' 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ REQUEST FOR LOT #1
(Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N 00°00'55" W 213.00' W 00°00'55" N Waiver of 6.16' Waiver of 6.16' Waiver of 8.73% Waiver of 1.84% N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant Waiver of 907 SF N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant 65 FT 0 FT 51.84 % 73.73 % 8,876 SQ.FT. 30 FT 25 FT MAX 60 % MAX 50 % MIN 30 FT 5 FT EACH 81.61 FT MAX 28 FT 20 FT 0 FT 0 FT 4 units on PROPOSED 7,357 SQ.FT. 6,918 SQ.FT. 69.8 FT 43.84 FT 43.84 FT 0.404 acres lot 25 FT 25 FT MAX 60 % MIN 30 FT MAX 50 % MAX 60 % MIN 30 FT PROPOSED MAX 50 % 13.6 FT 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH MAX 28 FT MAX 28 FT 27.6 FT 0.652(11460 SF) PROPOSED PROPOSED (0.136 ACRES) (0.173 ACRES) 60% 50% 60% 50% 5 FT 5 FT 28 FT 25 FT 28 FT 25 FT 50 FT 50 FT 3 FT 3 FT 65% 50% 30 FT 30 FT 35 FT 30 FT 25 FT 60 FT REQUIRED REQUIRED PER 1 INIT PER 1 INIT REQUIRED 5,900 SQ.FT. 5,900 SQ.FT. 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 0.6 (10,553 SF) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #2 AREA AREA 16 units per acre WIDTH WIDTH HEIGHT HEIGHT SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #5 AREA CONTROL CONTROL SETBACK SETBACK EACH SIDE EACH SIDE ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #1 (R2) SIDEYARD SIDEYARD REAR YARD REAR YARD WIDTH DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE FRONT YARD FRONT YARD (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT HEIGHT REAR YARD REAR YARD MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONAL DIMENSIONAL WIDTH LOT AREA 17,588 sq.ft. ( 0.404 acres) MAX. BUILDING MAX. BUILDING SETBACK LOT AREA 6,918 sq.ft. SETBACK SETBACK HEIGHT LOT AREA 7,357 sq.ft. DENSITY SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS CONTROL SETBACK EACH SIDE SIDEYARD REAR YARD PERMITTED DRIVEWAY MAXIMUM CONTROL COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE FRONT YARD (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) MINIMUM LOT REAR YARD REAR YARD SIDE (EAST) COVERAGE MINIMUM LOT SIDE (WEST) DIMENSIONAL IMPERVIOUS REAR YARD FLOOR AREA MAX. BUILDING FRONT YARD MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONAL MAX. BUILDING LOT AREA 8,876 sq.ft. MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS 0 FT 0 FT 73.73 % 51.84 % 30 FT 43.84 FT 43.84 FT 25 FT 25 FT MAX 60 % MAX 50 % MIN 30 FT MAX 60 % MAX 50 % MIN 30 FT 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH 81.61 FT ( 4-UNIT TOWNHOUSE BUILDING) MAX 28 FT N 89°59'05" E 50.01' MAX 28 FT 20 FT 4 units on PROPOSED PROPOSED ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #6 & OUTLOT A (R3) 69.8 FT 5,931.85 SQ.FT. 7,526.38 SQ.FT. 0.404 acres lot PROPOSED 13.6 FT 27.6 FT 0.652(11460 SF) ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #5 ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #6 AREA AREA WIDTH WIDTH HEIGHT HEIGHT WIDTH LOT AREA 17,589 sq.ft. ( 0.404 acres) SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK HEIGHT DENSITY SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK CONTROL CONTROL SETBACK SETBACK EACH SIDE EACH SIDE SIDEYARD SIDEYARD REAR YARD REAR YARD PERMITTED DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY MAXIMUM CONTROL - - COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE 1 1 1 1 1 4 9 FRONT YARD FRONT YARD (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT REAR YARD REAR YARD REAR YARD SIDE (EAST) COVERAGE MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT SIDE (WEST) DIMENSIONAL DIMENSIONAL IMPERVIOUS REAR YARD FLOOR AREA MAX. BUILDING MAX. BUILDING FRONT YARD MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONAL MAX. BUILDING No of UNITS / LOT MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS 5 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES LOT AREA 5,931.85 sq.ft. LOT AREA 7,526.38 sq.ft. 8 GARAGE SPACES 4 VISITOR SPACES MEDINA GARDENS 10 GARAGE SPACES 10 VISITOR SPACES POARKING PROVIDED TOWNHOUSE PROPOSAL ( 4-UNIT TOWNHOUSE BUILDING) TOTAL PROPOSED: 32 SPACES ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #7 & OUTLOT A (R3)
8,109 SF. 8,876 SF. PROPOSED 1.56081 acres 61.10% 38.90% 9 DWELLING UNIT PER 1 ACRE N N 4 TOWNHOUSES plus CALCULATED ...... 0.233 0.169 0.159 0.183 0.186 0.204 0.404 0.023 1.561 PARKING DEMAND 4 x 2= 8 SPACES 5 x 2= 10 SPACES ACRE / EXACT BUILDING FOOT PRINT FOR LOT 1, 2, 3, 4, EXACT BUILDING FOOT PRINT FOR / / / / / LOT / / / 1, 2, 3, 4, DATE DATE 08-30-2019 05-11-2019 06-24-2020 08-30-2019 05-11-2019 12-10-2018 12-10-2018 WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ REQUEST FOR LOT #2 REQUEST FOR LOT #2 Waiver of 3' Waiver of 3' TOTAL REQUIRED: 18 SPACES Waiver of 6.16' 997 & 5 TO BE DETERMINED ONCE LOTS ARE 5, & 6 TO BE DETERMINED ONCE LOTS IS N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant 7,357 6,918 7,990 8,109 8,876 10,153 17,588
N 67,988.95 PURCHASED. BUILDING SHOWN ARE PURCHASED. BUILDING SHOWNAREA SQ. FT. / ARE 35% MINIMUM 65% MAXIMUM UNIT UNIT ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENTS & 5 TO BE DETERMINED ONCE LOTS ARE CONCEPTUAL PLANS. (Sec.12-6-3 ) EXACT BUILDING FOOT PRINT FOR LOT 1, 2, 3, 4, PURCHASED. BUILDING SHOWN ARE CONCEPTUAL PLANS. CONCEPTUAL1 ACRE MINIMUM PLANS. (0.183 ACRES) (0.186 ACRES) 60% 50% 60% 50% 2 SPACES PER 1 DWELLING 28 FT 25 FT 28 FT 25 FT 2 SPACES PER 1 DWELLING 50 FT 50 FT 3 FT 3 FT 30 FT 30 FT
REQUIRED REQUIRED S 00°00'00" E 600.07' (M) 600.30' (R) 600.30' (M) 600.07' E 00°00'00" S PER 1 INIT PER 1 INIT 5,900 SQ.FT. 5,900 SQ.FT. 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 5 OUTLOT B TOTAL CUL-DE-SAC PROPOSED SUBDIVIDED LOTS LOT NO. 5 LOT USE LOT 6 & OUTLOT A PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS ZONING OVERALL ANALYSIS DENSITY MAXIMUM MAXIMUM
COVERAGE COVERAGE 997 SF. 997 RESIDENTIAL WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ REQUEST FOR LOT #2 REQUEST FOR LOT #2 Waiver of 3' Waiver of 3' OPEN SPACE ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #5 DIMENSION ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #5 LOT SIZE FOR AT CONTROL DEVELOPMENT Waiver of 6.16' Waiver of 6.16' IMPERVIOUS LOT PUD ELIGIBILITY 4 TOWNHOUSES N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N LINCOLN AVENUE N/A - compliant (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) 65 FT (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) 0 FT DEDICATED TO VILLAGE 0 FT 7,990 SQ.FT. 43.84 FT 25 FT 25 FT MAX 60 % MIN 30 FT MIN 30 FT MAX 60 % MAX 50 % MAX 50 % 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH MAX 28 FT OF MORTON GROVE MAX 28 FT 8,109 SQ.FT. PROPOSED
N 86°33'14"FORLOT PUBLIC AREA ESTREET 81.82' 8,876 sq.ft. (0.204 ACRES) PROPOSED LOT AREA 5,931.85 sq.ft. (0.136 ACRES) N 00°00'55" W 383.95' W 00°00'55" N
10,153 SF. REVISIONS REVISIONS (0.177 ACRES) (0.139 ACRES) 60% 50% 60% 50% 28 FT 25 FT 28 FT 25 FT 50 FT 50 FT 3 FT 3 FT 30 FT 30 FT REQUIRED REQUIRED PER 1 INIT DIMENSIONAL PER 1 INIT DIMENSIONAL 5,900 SQ.FT. WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ 5,900 SQ.FT. WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ 5 FT EACH CONTROL PROPOSED REQUIRED 5 FT EACH CONTROL PROPOSED REQUIRED (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) REQUEST FOR LOT #2 (Sec; 12-4-2-D) REQUEST FOR LOT #2
LINCOLN AVENUE LINCOLN AVENUE ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #3 ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #4 AREA AREA WIDTH WIDTH HEIGHT HEIGHT SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK CONTROL CONTROL SETBACK SETBACK EACH SIDE EACH SIDE SIDEYARD SIDEYARD REAR YARD REAR YARD DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE FRONT YARD FRONT YARD (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT REAR YARD REAR YARD MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONAL DIMENSIONAL MAX. BUILDING MINIMUM LOT MAX. BUILDING MINIMUM LOT LINCOLN AVENUE 5,900 SQ.FT. LOT AREA 7,990 sq.ft. LOT AREA 8,109 sq.ft. 5,900 SQ.FT. MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS AREA 8,876 SQ.FT. MAX. IMPERVIOUS AREA 5,931.85 SQ.FT. 0 FT PER 1 INIT N/A - compliant 0 FT PER 1 INIT N/A - compliant PRELIMINARY PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW 43.84 FT 43.84 FT 25 FT 25 FT MAX 60 % MIN 30 FT MIN 30 FT MAX 60 % MAX 50 % MAX 50 % 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH MAX 28 FT MAX 28 FT PROPOSED PROPOSED N 86°33'14"MINIMUM E 81.82'LOT 50 FT 7,704.99 SQ.FT. 6,137.63 SQ.FT. MINIMUM LOT 50 FT 65 FT N/A - compliant 43.84 FT Waiver of 6.16' N 00°00'55" W 383.95' N 89°59'05" E 50.01' WIDTH N 00°00'55"(Sec; 12-4-2-D)W 383.95' N 89°59'05" E 50.01' WIDTH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 1B 1B 1A 1A 1A 1C 1A FRONT YARD 25 FT FRONT YARD 25 FT
25 FT N/A - compliant ISSUE 25 FT N/A - compliant ISSUE SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #3 ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #4 AREA 6,063.15 SF. AREA WIDTH WIDTH HEIGHT HEIGHT EACH SIDE DEDICATED TO VILLAGE OF MORTON GROVE EACH SIDE SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH N/A - compliant SETBACK 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH N/A - compliant CONTROL CONTROL SETBACK SETBACK EACH SIDE EACH SIDE SIDEYARD SIDEYARD REAR YARD REAR YARD DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY 6,661.44 SF. SETBACK SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) COVERAGE COVERAGE
(Sec; 12-4-2-D) COVERAGE COVERAGE FRONT YARD FRONT YARD (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT REAR YARD REAR YARD MINIMUM LOT 7,990 SF. MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONAL DIMENSIONAL MAX. BUILDING MAX. BUILDING
7,357 SF.
8,109 SF. MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS
REAR YARD A. VEER P.E. REAR YARD A. VEER P.E. LOT AREA 7,704.99 sq.ft. LOT AREA 6,137.63 sq.ft. 6,918 SF. B. BONO P.E. B. BONO P.E. 7,357 SF. MIN 30 FT 30 FT N/A - compliant W. HEPBURN MIN 30 FT 30 FT N/A - compliant W. HEPBURN T/F 628.75SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) MAX. BUILDING MAX. BUILDING DEDICATED TO VILLAGE MAX 28 FTSF. 10,105 28 FT N/A - compliant MAX 28 FT 28 FT N/A - compliant
FOR PUBLIC STREET OF MORTON GROVE HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D)
FOR PUBLIC STREET 6,774.12MAX. SF. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 50 % 50% N/A - compliant MAX 50 % 50% N/A - compliant N 00°00'55" W 213.00' REAR YARD N 00°00'55" W 213.00' REAR YARD S 89°12'39" W 131.53' S 89°12'39" W 131.53' (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 10,153 SF. COVERAGE COVERAGE PROJECT STAFF PROJECT STAFF
5,931.85 SF. 10,374.62 SF. 60% 60% N 86°33'14" E 81.82' N 86°33'14" E 81.82' WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ REQUEST FOR LOT #2 N/A - compliant REQUEST FOR LOT #2 N/A - compliant Waiver of 3' MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 60 % Waiver of 3' MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 60 % Waiver of 6.16' 6,774.12 SF. Waiver of 6.16' 6,774.12 SF. N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant 6,137.63 SF. COVERAGE (Sec; 12-4-2-D) COVERAGE (Sec; 12-4-2-D)
6,918 SF. TECHNICIAN: TECHNICIAN: PROJECT MANAGER: ENGINEER: ENGINEER: PROJECT MANAGER: ENGINEER: ENGINEER: T/F 628.75 T/F 628.75 T/F 628.75 0 FT 3 FT 0 FT 3 FT DRIVEWAYS 89°12'39" W 131.53' SF. 10,814.80 Waiver of 3' DRIVEWAY Waiver of 3' SIDEYARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) SIDEYARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (0.169 ACRES) (0.159 ACRES) 50% 60% 50% 60% 28 FT 25 FT 28 FT 25 FT 50 FT 50 FT 3 FT 6,774.12 SF. 3 FT 30 FT 30 FT REQUIRED REQUIRED PER 1 INIT SETBACK PER 1 INIT SETBACK 5,900 SQ.FT. 5,900 SQ.FT. 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH
(Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N 00°00'55" W 213.00' W 00°00'55" N
8,876 SF. WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ REQUEST FOR LOT #2 REQUEST FOR LOT #2 Waiver of 3' Waiver of 3' Waiver of 6.16' Waiver of 6.16'
7,526.38 SF. N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #6 I I 7,704.99 SF. 0 FT 0 FT
7,990 SF. 7,357 SQ.FT. 6,918 SQ.FT. 43.84 FT 43.84 FT 25 FT 25 FT MAX 60 % MIN 30 FT MAX 50 % MAX 60 % MIN 30 FT MAX 50 % 5 FT EACH
5 FT EACH (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) MAX 28 FT MAX 28 FT PROPOSED PROPOSED ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #6 & OUTLOT A (R3) (847) 823-3303 LOT AREA 7,526.38 sq.ft. (0.173 ACRES) (847) 823-3303 (0.153 ACRES) (0.141 ACRES) 50% 60% 50% 60% 28 FT 25 FT 28 FT 25 FT 50 FT 50 FT 3 FT 3 FT 30 FT 30 FT REQUIRED REQUIRED PER 1 INIT PER 1 INIT 5,900 SQ.FT. 10,105 SF. ( 4-UNIT TOWNHOUSE BUILDING) 5,900 SQ.FT. 10,814.80 SF. 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH [email protected] [email protected] PH : (847) 823-3300 FAX: PH : (847) 823-3300 FAX: (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N 00°00'55" W 213.00' W 00°00'55" N DIMENSIONAL PROPOSED REQUIRED WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ C CONTROL C ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #2 AREA 997 SF. AREA WIDTH LOT AREA 17,588 sq.ft. ( 0.404 acres) WIDTH REQUEST FOR LOT #2 HEIGHT HEIGHT SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK CONTROL CONTROL SETBACK SETBACK EACH SIDE EACH SIDE ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #1 (R2) SIDEYARD SIDEYARD REAR YARD REAR YARD DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE FRONT YARD FRONT YARD (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT REAR YARD REAR YARD MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONAL DIMENSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEERS CIVIL ENGINEERS MAX. BUILDING MAX. BUILDING LOT AREA 6,918 sq.ft.
DIMENSIONAL LOT AREA 7,357 sq.ft. MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS PROPOSED REQUIRED WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ MAX. IMPERVIOUS 0 FT 0 FT MINIMUM LOT S 00°00'00" E 600.07' (M) 600.30' (R) CONTROL REQUESTS 00°00'00" FOR LOT E#1 600.07' (M) 600.30' (R) 5,900 SQ.FT. 43.84 FT 43.84 FT 25 FT 25 FT MAX 60 % MIN 30 FT MAX 50 % MAX 60 % MIN 30 FT MAX 50 % 7,526.38 SQ.FT. B B 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH AREA MAX 28 FT MAX 28 FT PER 1 INIT N/A - compliant PROPOSED PROPOSED 6,661.44 SQ.FT. 6,137.63 SQ.FT.
MINIMUM LOT 50 FT MAXIMUM BONO CONSULTING, INC. 43.84 FT Waiver of 6.16' BONO CONSULTING, INC. 4 units on 16 units per acre WIDTH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N 89°59'05" E 50.01' PERMITTED (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliant DENSITY 0.404 acres lot FRONT YARD 25 FT ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #2 25 FT N/A - compliant AREA AREA WIDTH ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #1 (R2) ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #3 WIDTH ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #1 (R2) ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #3 HEIGHT HEIGHT SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK MINIMUM LOT 60 FT SETBACK PARK RIDGE, IL 60068 PARK RIDGE, IL 60068 1018 BUSSE HIGHWAY 1018 BUSSE HIGHWAY CONTROL CONTROL SETBACK SETBACK EACH SIDE EACH SIDE ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #1 (R2) SIDEYARD SIDEYARD REAR YARD 81.61 FT N/A - compliant REAR YARD DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE FRONT YARD FRONT YARD
(Sec; 12-4-2-D) (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) EACH SIDE MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT REAR YARD REAR YARD 5 FT EACH MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONAL WIDTH DIMENSIONAL MAX. BUILDING (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) MAX. BUILDING (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) 5 FT EACH N/A - compliant SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS
FRONT YARD LOT AREA 6,661.44 sq.ft. LOT AREA 6,137.63 sq.ft. 20 FT 25 FT LOT AREA 7,357 sq.ft. (0.169 ACRES) LOT AREA 7,990 sq.ft. (0.183 ACRES) SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) Waiver of 5' LOT AREA 6,661.44 sq.ft. (0.153 ACRES) LOT AREA 7,704.99 sq.ft. (0.177 ACRES) REAR YARD ZONING OVERALL ANALYSIS ZONING OVERALL ANALYSIS MIN 30 FT 30 FT SETBACK N/A - compliant SIDE (WEST) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 13.6 FT 5 FT N/A - compliant DIMENSIONAL DIMENSIONAL SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) DIMENSIONAL DIMENSIONAL MAX. BUILDING CONTROL PROPOSED REQUIRED WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ CONTROL PROPOSED REQUIRED WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ CONTROL PROPOSED REQUIRED WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ CONTROL PROPOSED REQUIRED WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ MAX 28 FT 28 FT ORDINANCE ORDINANCE HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliant REQUEST FOR LOT #2 REQUEST FOR LOT #2 SIDE (EAST) 5 FT REQUEST FOR LOT #2 REQUEST FOR LOT #2 DIMENSION REQUIREMENTS PROPOSED N 89°59'05" E 50.01' 27.6 FT DIMENSION N/A - compliantREQUIREMENTS PROPOSED - -
(Sec; 12-4-2-D) 1 1 1 1 1 4 9 AT CONTROL SETBACK AT CONTROL MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 50 % 50% N/A - compliant REAR YARD REAR YARD 30 FT No of UNITS / LOT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT 69.8 FT N/A - compliant MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 5 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES COVERAGE SETBACK 8 GARAGE SPACES 4 VISITOR SPACES MEDINA GARDENS 5,900 SQ.FT. 5,900 SQ.FT. 10 GARAGE SPACES 10 VISITOR SPACES 5,900 SQ.FT. 5,900 SQ.FT. 7,357 SQ.FT. 7,990 SQ.FT. 6,661.44 SQ.FT. 7,704.99 SQ.FT.
LOT SIZE FOR 1 ACRE MINIMUM AREA AREA LOT SIZE FOR 1 ACRE MINIMUM POARKING PROVIDED AREA AREA 1.56081 acres N/A - compliant N/A - compliant 1.56081 acres TOWNHOUSE PROPOSAL N/A - compliant N/A - compliant PER 1 INIT PER 1 INIT MAX. BUILDING 30 FT 35 FT PER 1 INIT PER 1 INIT (Sec.12-6-3 ) (Sec.12-6-3 ) TOTAL PROPOSED: 32 SPACES 60% PUD ELIGIBILITY (Sec;PUD 12-4-2-D) ELIGIBILITYN/A - compliant MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 60 % N/A - compliant HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) MINIMUM LOT 50 FT MINIMUM LOT 50 FT MINIMUM LOT 50 FT MINIMUM LOT 50 FT COVERAGE 43.84 FT Waiver of 6.16' 43.84 FT Waiver of 6.16' 0.6 (10,553 SF) 43.84 FT Waiver of 6.16' 43.84 FT Waiver of 6.16' WIDTH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) WIDTH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) FLOOR AREA 0.652(11460 SF) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) Waiver of 907 SF WIDTH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) WIDTH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) MAXIMUM 9 DWELLING UNIT PER 1 ACRE 8,876 SF. MAXIMUM 9 DWELLING UNIT PER 1 ACRE FRONT YARD 25 FT FRONT YARD 25 FT 8,109 SF. FRONT YARD 25 FT FRONT YARD 25 FT 25 FT N/A - compliant 25 FT N/A - compliant PROPOSED 25 FT N/A - compliant 25 FT N/A - compliant 0 FT 3 FT
1.56081 acres Waiver of 3' DENSITY 4 TOWNHOUSES plus SETBACK SETBACK IMPERVIOUS DENSITY 4 TOWNHOUSES61.10% plus38.90% SETBACK SETBACK DRIVEWAY 5 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 73.73 % 65% Waiver of 8.73% 6 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 9 DWELLING UNIT PER 1 ACRE - COVERAGE 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 SIDEYARD EACH SIDE 5 FT EACH EACH SIDE 5 FT EACH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) EACH SIDE 5 FT EACH10 EACH SIDE 5 FT EACH MAXIMUM 5 FT EACH N/A - compliant 5 FT EACH N/A - compliant MAXIMUM 5 FT EACH N/A - compliant 5 FT EACH N/A - compliant SETBACK 4 TOWNHOUSES plus SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) SETBACKNo of UNITS / LOT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) CALCULATED ...... 65% MAXIMUM 61.10% MAX. IMPERVIOUS 50% 65% MAXIMUM 61.10% ...... 0.233 0.169 0.159 0.183 0.186 0.204 0.404 0.023 1.561 IMPERVIOUS LOT IMPERVIOUS LOTWaiver of 1.84% 6 VISITOR SPACES ...... 51.84 % ...... 6 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 8 GARAGE SPACES 4 VISITOR SPACES MEDINA GARDENS PARKING DEMAND 12 GARAGE SPACES COVERAGE REAR YARD REAR YARD REAR YARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D)COVERAGE 4 x 2= 8 SPACES REAR YARD REAR YARD 5 x 2= 10 SPACES POARKING PROVIDED TOWNHOUSE PROPOSAL MIN 30 FT 30 FT MIN 30 FT 30 FT ACRE MIN 30 FT 30 FT MIN 30 FT 30 FT SETBACK N/A - compliant SETBACK N/A - compliant COVERAGE SETBACK N/A - compliant SETBACK N/A - compliant ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #7 & OUTLOT A (R3)
(Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) TOTAL PROPOSED: 30 SPACES (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) / OPEN SPACE MAX. BUILDING MAX. BUILDING OPEN SPACE MAX. BUILDING / / / / / / / / MAX. BUILDING 35% MINIMUM 38.90% MAX 28 FT 28 FT MAX 28 FT 28 FT 35% MINIMUM 38.90% MAX 28 FT 28 FT MAX 28 FT 28 FT N/A - compliant ( 4-UNIT TOWNHOUSE BUILDING) COVERAGE ...... HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliant HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliant COVERAGE ...... HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliant HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS LOT AREA 17,589 sq.ft. ( 0.404 acres) 50% N/A - compliant 50% N/A - compliant PROPOSED 50% N/A - compliant 50% N/A - compliant TOTAL REQUIRED: 18 SPACES 1.56081 acres
MAX 50 % MAX 50 % MAX 50 % 997 MAX 50 % REAR YARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) REAR YARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 61.10% 38.90% REAR YARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) REAR YARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 7,357 6,918 7,990 8,109 8,876 9 DWELLING UNIT PER 1 ACRE 10,153 COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE 17,588 COVERAGE DIMENSIONAL 67,988.95 PROPOSED REQUIRED WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ 4 TOWNHOUSES plus AREA SQ. FT. /
CALCULATED CONTROL 0404 ...... 60% 60% ...... 60% 60% REQUEST FOR LOT #1 0.153 0.141 0.177 0.140 0.136 0.173 1.561 MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 60 % N/A - compliant MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 60 % N/A - compliant MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 60 % 0.238 N/A - compliant MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 60 % N/A - compliant PARKING DEMAND 4 x 2= 8 SPACES PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS 35% MINIMUM
(Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 65% MAXIMUM (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 6 x 2= 12 SPACES
COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGEACRE COVERAGE UNIT UNIT 5,931.85 SF. 7,526.38 SF. ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS 6,063.15 SF. REQUIREMENTS & 5 TO BE DETERMINED ONCE LOTS ARE CONCEPTUAL PLANS. (Sec.12-6-3 ) EXACT BUILDING FOOT PRINT FOR LOT 1, 2, 3, 4, PURCHASED. BUILDING SHOWN ARE / / / / / / / / / 1 ACRE MINIMUM MAXIMUM CALCULATED POARKING PROVIDED CALCULATED POARKING PROVIDED 4 units on 16 units per acre REQUIREMENTS 0 FT 3 FT 0 FT 3 FT REQUIREMENTS 0 FT 3 FT 0 FT 3 FT PERMITTED Waiver of 3' Waiver of 3' 2 SPACES PER 1 DWELLING Waiver of 3' Waiver of 3' PARKING DEMAND MEDINA GARDENS PARKING DEMAND MEDINA GARDENS 2 SPACES PER 1 DWELLING DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY 0.404 acres lot (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliant
(Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (R) 600.30' (M) 600.07' E 00°00'00" S (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) DENSITY USE TOWNHOUSE PROPOSAL SIDEYARD SIDEYARD USE TOWNHOUSE PROPOSAL SIDEYARD SIDEYARD
SETBACK SETBACK TOTAL REQUIRED: 20 SPACES SETBACK SETBACK MINIMUM LOT 81.61 FT 60 FT N/A - compliant WIDTH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 5 OUTLOT B 2 SPACES PER 1 DWELLING 4 x 2= 8 SPACES 2 SPACES PER 1 DWELLING 4 x 2= 8 SPACES TOTAL 8 GARAGE SPACES 8 GARAGE SPACES CUL-DE-SAC 67,988.95 PROPOSED SUBDIVIDED LOTS 6,661.44 6,137.63 7,704.99 6,063.15 5,931.85 7,526.38 4 TOWNHOUSES 4 TOWNHOUSES LOT NO. FRONT YARD 25 FT AREA SQ. FT. / 10,374.62 17,588.92
5 LOT 20 FT UNIT 4 VISITOR SPACES UNIT 4 VISITOR SPACES USE LOT 6 & OUTLOT A PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS Waiver of 5' ZONING OVERALL ANALYSIS DENSITY SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) MAXIMUM MAXIMUM
COVERAGE COVERAGE 997 SF. 997 RESIDENTIAL 35% MINIMUM OPEN SPACE DIMENSION 65% MAXIMUM
ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #2 ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #4 LOT SIZE FOR ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #2 ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #4
5 LOT 6 LOT AT CONTROL UNIT DEVELOPMENT
UNIT SIDE (WEST)
IMPERVIOUS LOT 5 FT PUD ELIGIBILITY ORDINANCE 2 SPACES PER 1 DWELLING 2 SPACES PER 1 DWELLING 4 TOWNHOUSES RESIDENTIAL 5 x 2= 10 SPACES 10 GARAGE SPACES RESIDENTIAL 6 x 2= 12 SPACES 12 GARAGE SPACES 13.6 FT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliant REQUIREMENTS
REQUIREMENTS SETBACK 5, & 6 TO BE DETERMINED ONCE LOTS IS CONCEPTUAL PLANS. (Sec.12-6-3 ) UNIT 10 VISITOR SPACES EXACT BUILDING FOOT PRINT FOR LOT 1, 2, 3, 4, PURCHASED. BUILDING SHOWN ARE UNIT 6 VISITOR SPACES DEVELOPMENT (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) DEVELOPMENT 1 ACRE MINIMUM (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) SIDE (EAST) 5 FT
2 SPACES PER 1 DWELLING 27.6 FT N/A - compliant TOTAL PROPOSED: 32 SPACES TOTAL PROPOSED: 30 SPACES 2 SPACES PER 1 DWELLING SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) TOTAL REQUIRED: 18 SPACES LOT AREA 6,918 sq.ft. (0.159 ACRES) LOT AREA 8,109 sq.ft. (0.186 ACRES) DEDICATED TO VILLAGE (R) 600.30' (M) 600.07' E 00°00'00" S TOTAL REQUIRED: 20 SPACES LOT AREA 6,137.63 sq.ft. (0.141 ACRES) LOT AREA 6,137.63 sq.ft. (0.139 ACRES) OF MORTON GROVE REAR YARD 30 FT 69.8 FT N/A - compliant DIMENSIONAL DIMENSIONAL FOR PUBLIC STREET DIMENSIONAL DIMENSIONAL SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D)
REQUIRED WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ REQUIRED WAIVER/SPECIAL383.95' W 00°00'55" N USE/ REQUIRED WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ REQUIRED WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ CONTROL PROPOSED CONTROL PROPOSED 10,153 SF. CONTROL LOT 1 LOT 2 PROPOSEDLOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 5 LOT 6 CONTROL PROPOSED TOTAL
CUL-DE-SAC MAX. BUILDING 35 FT
PROPOSED SUBDIVIDED LOTS 30 FT REQUEST FOR LOT #2 REQUEST FOR LOT #2 LOT NO. REQUEST FOR LOT #2 REQUEST FOR LOT #2 N/A - compliant 6 LOT
USE (Sec; 12-4-2-D) PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS LOT 7 & OUTLOT
ZONING OVERALL ANALYSIS HEIGHT DENSITY MAXIMUM PROPOSED SUBDIVIDED LOTS PROPOSED SUBDIVIDEDMAXIMUM LOTS COVERAGE COVERAGE RESIDENTIAL OPEN SPACE DIMENSION 0.6 (10,553 SF) LOT SIZE FOR AT CONTROL LOT NO. AREA SQ. FT. / ACRE No of UNITS / LOT LOT NO. AREA SQ. FT. / ACRE No of UNITS / LOT DEVELOPMENT IMPERVIOUS LOT PUD ELIGIBILITY 4 TOWNHOUSES FLOOR AREA 0.652(11460 SF) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) Waiver of 907 SF MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT / 5,900 SQ.FT. 5,900 SQ.FT. / 5,900 SQ.FT. 5,900 SQ.FT. LOT 1 7,357 0.169 1 AREA 6,918 SQ.FT. AREA 8,109 SQ.FT. LOT 1 6,661.44 0.153 1 AREA 6,137.63 SQ.FT. AREA 6,137.63 SQ.FT. PER 1 INIT N/A - compliant PER 1 INIT N/A - compliant PER 1 INIT N/A - compliant PER 1 INIT N/A - compliant IMPERVIOUS LOT 2 6,918 / 0.159 1 LOT 2 6,137.63 / 0.141 1 73.73 % 65% Waiver of 8.73% COVERAGE (Sec; 12-4-2-D) MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT 50 FT MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT LOT 3 7,990 / 0.183 1 43.84 FT 50 FT Waiver of 6.16' 65 FT N/A - compliant LOT 3 7,704.99 / 0.177 1 43.84 FT 50 FT Waiver of 6.16' 43.84 FT 50 FT Waiver of 6.16' WIDTH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) WIDTH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) WIDTH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) WIDTH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) MAX. IMPERVIOUS 51.84 % 50% Waiver of 1.84% LOT 4 8,109 / 0.186 1 10,374.62 SF. LOT 4 6,063.15 / 0.140 1 REAR YARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) FRONT YARD FRONT YARD 383.95' W 00°00'55" N FRONT YARD FRONT YARD 25 FT 25 FT N/A - compliant 25 FT 25 FT N/A - compliant 25 FT 25 FT N/A - compliant 25 FT 25 FT N/A - compliant COVERAGE LOT 5 8,876 / 0.204 1 SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) LOT 5 5,931.85 / 0.136 1 SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) LOT 6 & OUTLOT A 17,588 / 0.404 4 EACH SIDE EACH SIDE LOT 6 7,526.38 / 0.173 1 EACH SIDE EACH SIDE 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH N/A - compliant 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH N/A - compliant DEDICATED TO VILLAGE OF MORTON GROVE 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH N/A - compliant 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH N/A - compliant OUTLOT B 997 / 0.023 - SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) FOR PUBLIC STREET LOT 7 & OUTLOT 17,588.92 / 0404 4 SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) REAR YARD REAR YARD REAR YARD REAR YARD CUL-DE-SAC 10,153 / 0.233 - MIN 30 FT 30 FT MIN 30 FT 30 FT CUL-DE-SAC 10,374.62 / 0.238 - MIN 30 FT 30 FT MIN 30 FT 30 FT SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliant SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliant SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliant SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliant TOTAL 67,988.95 / 1.561 9 TOTAL 67,988.95 / 1.561 10 MAX. BUILDING MAX. BUILDING MAX. BUILDING MAX. BUILDING MAX 28 FT 28 FT N/A - compliant MAX 28 FT 28 FT N/A - compliant MAX 28 FT 28 FT N/A - compliant MAX 28 FT 28 FT N/A - compliant HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 50 % 50% N/A - compliant MAX 50 % 50% N/A - compliant MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 50 % 50% N/A - compliant MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 50 % 50% N/A - compliant REAR YARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) REAR YARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) REAR YARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) REAR YARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE
60% 60% 60% 60% MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 60 % N/A - compliant MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 60 % N/A - compliant 7,990 SF. MEDINA GARDENS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 60 % N/A - compliant MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 60 % N/A - compliant MEDINA GARDENS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (Sec; 12-4-2-D) COVERAGE (Sec; 12-4-2-D) PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN & GEOMETRIC COVERAGE (Sec; 12-4-2-D) COVERAGE (Sec; 12-4-2-D) PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN & GEOMETRIC 7,357 SF. 6,918 SF.
0 FT 3 FT 0 FT 3 FT 0 FT 3 FT 0 FT 3 FT DRIVEWAY Waiver of 3' DRIVEWAY Waiver of 3' DRIVEWAY Waiver of 3' DRIVEWAY Waiver of 3' SIDEYARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) SIDEYARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) SIDEYARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) SIDEYARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D)
SETBACK SETBACK 6021-6037 LINCOLN, MORTON GROVE, COOK COUNTY, IL SETBACK SETBACK 6021-6037 LINCOLN, MORTON GROVE, COOK COUNTY, IL
COPYRIGHT: COPYRIGHT: THIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE USED, THIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE USED, REPRODUCED, MODIFIED OR SOLD EITHER REPRODUCED, MODIFIED OR SOLD EITHER WHOLLY OR IN PART, EXCEPT WHEN WHOLLY OR IN PART, EXCEPT WHEN AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER. AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER.
7,704.99 SF. PROJECT NUMBER: 17239 PROJECT NUMBER: 17239 6,661.44 SF. 6,137.63 SF. START DATE: JUN. 10, 2017 START DATE: JUN. 10, 2017
S 89°12'39" W 131.53' SCALE: 1"=30'-0 SCALE: 1"=30'-0 SHEET NUMBER SHEET NUMBER 14 OF - 14 OF -
S 89°12'39" W 131.53'
6021-6037 LINCOLN, MORTON GROVE, COOK COUNTY, IL COUNTY, COOK GROVE, MORTON LINCOLN, 6021-6037
PARK RIDGE, IL 60068 IL RIDGE, PARK (847) 823-3303 (847) FAX: [email protected]
6021-6037 LINCOLN, MORTON GROVE, COOK COUNTY, IL COUNTY, COOK GROVE, MORTON LINCOLN, 17239 6021-6037 - 1018 BUSSE HIGHWAY BUSSE 1018
PH : (847) 823-3300 (847) : PH
PARK RIDGE, IL 60068 IL RIDGE, PARK (847) 823-3303 (847) FAX: FAX: 1"=30'-0
MEDINA GARDENS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLANNED GARDENS MEDINA 17239 - 1018 BUSSE HIGHWAY BUSSE 1018 PH : (847) 823-3300 (847) : PH
1"=30'-0 MEDINA GARDENS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLANNED GARDENS MEDINA CIVIL ENGINEERS CIVIL
JUN. 10, 2017
PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW VILLAGE FOR PLAN PRELIMINARY 1C 06-24-2020 BONO CONSULTING, INC. CONSULTING, BONO TECHNICIAN: CIVIL ENGINEERS CIVIL
JUN. 10, 2017 OF
I B
1B C PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW VILLAGE FOR PLAN PRELIMINARY
05-11-2019 W. HEPBURN W. PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW VILLAGE FOR PLAN PRELIMINARY 1C 06-24-2020 ENGINEER: BONO CONSULTING, INC. CONSULTING, BONO
TECHNICIAN:
OF
PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW VILLAGE FOR PLAN PRELIMINARY 1A 08-30-2019 I B A. VEER P.E. VEER A. C 1B PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN & GEOMETRIC PLAN GEOMETRIC & PLAN SITE PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW VILLAGE FOR PLAN PRELIMINARY 05-11-2019 ENGINEER: W. HEPBURN W.
ENGINEER:
SHEET NUMBER
PRELIMINARY PLAN PRELIMINARY 1A 12-10-2018
PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW VILLAGE FOR PLAN PRELIMINARY 1A 08-30-2019 A. VEER P.E. VEER A. B. BONO P.E. BONO B. MANAGER: PROJECT PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN & GEOMETRIC PLAN GEOMETRIC & PLAN SITE PRELIMINARY ENGINEER:
SHEET NUMBER
PRELIMINARY PLAN PRELIMINARY 1A 12-10-2018
B. BONO P.E. BONO B. MANAGER: PROJECT
REVISIONS ISSUE STAFF PROJECT DATE
THIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE USED, WHOLLY OR IN PART, EXCEPT WHEN AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER. COPYRIGHT: START DATE: SCALE: REPRODUCED, MODIFIED OR SOLD EITHER PROJECT NUMBER:
14
REVISIONS ISSUE STAFF PROJECT DATE THIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE USED, WHOLLY OR IN PART, EXCEPT WHEN AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER. COPYRIGHT: START DATE: SCALE: REPRODUCED, MODIFIED OR SOLD EITHER PROJECT NUMBER: 14 N N EXACT BUILDING FOOT PRINT FOR LOT 1, 2, 3, 4, EXACT BUILDING FOOT PRINT FOR LOT 1, 2, 3, 4, DATE DATE 08-30-2019 05-11-2019 06-24-2020 08-30-2019 05-11-2019 & 5 TO BE DETERMINED ONCE LOTS ARE 5, & 6 TO BE DETERMINED12-10-2018 ONCE LOTS IS 12-10-2018 PURCHASED. BUILDING SHOWN ARE PURCHASED. BUILDING SHOWN ARE CONCEPTUAL PLANS. CONCEPTUAL PLANS. Waiver of 5' WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ REQUEST FOR LOT #2 Waiver of 3' WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ REQUEST FOR LOT #1 ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #5 ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #5 Waiver of 8.73% Waiver of 1.84% N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant Waiver of 907 SF N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant Waiver of 5' WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ REQUEST FOR LOT #2 Waiver of 3' WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ REQUEST FOR LOT #1 Waiver of 8.73% Waiver of 1.84% N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) Waiver of 907 SF N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant LOT AREA 8,876 sq.ft. (0.204 ACRES) LOT AREA 5,931.85 sq.ft. (0.136 ACRES) REVISIONS REVISIONS (0.204 ACRES) 50% 60% 5 FT 5 FT 25 FT 28 FT 50 FT 3 FT 65% 50% 30 FT 35 FT 30 FT 25 FT 60 FT REQUIRED PER 1 INIT
REQUIRED DIMENSIONAL DIMENSIONAL 5,900 SQ.FT. 5 FT EACH (0.204 ACRES) WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ 50% 60% 5 FT 5 FT
25 FT 28 FT REQUIRED REQUIRED 50 FT
(Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) PROPOSED (Sec; 12-4-2-D) CONTROL PROPOSED CONTROL 3 FT 65% 50% 30 FT 0.6 (10,553 SF) 35 FT 30 FT 25 FT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 60 FT REQUIRED (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) PER 1 INIT REQUIRED 16 units per acre
5,900 SQ.FT. REQUEST FOR LOT #2 REQUEST FOR LOT #2
LINCOLN AVENUE LINCOLN AVENUE 5 FT EACH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 0.6 (10,553 SF) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 16 units per acre
MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT 5,900 SQ.FT. 5,900 SQ.FT.
65 FT AREA 8,876 SQ.FT. AREA 5,931.85 SQ.FT. 0 FT 73.73 % 51.84 % PER 1 INIT N/A - compliant PER 1 INIT N/A - compliant 8,876 SQ.FT. 30 FT PRELIMINARY PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR VILLAGE REVIEW 25 FT MAX 60 % MIN 30 FT MAX 50 % 5 FT EACH 81.61 FT MAX 28 FT 65 FT 20 FT 4 units on PROPOSED 0 FT 73.73 % 51.84 % 69.8 FT 0.404 acres lot PROPOSED 13.6 FT 27.6 FT 8,876 SQ.FT. MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT 0.652(11460 SF) 30 FT 50 FT 50 FT 25 FT MAX 60 % MIN 30 FT MAX 50 % 5 FT EACH 81.61 FT MAX 28 FT 65 FT 43.84 FT Waiver of 6.16' 20 FT N/A - compliant
N 89°59'05" E 50.01' 4 units on N 00°00'55" W 383.95' PROPOSED WIDTH N 00°00'55"(Sec; 12-4-2-D)W 383.95' N 89°59'05" E 50.01' WIDTH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 69.8 FT 0.404 acres lot PROPOSED 13.6 FT 27.6 FT 1B 1B 1A 1A 1A 1C 1A 0.652(11460 SF) FRONT YARD 25 FT FRONT YARD 25 FT
25 FT N/A - compliant ISSUE 25 FT N/A - compliant ISSUE SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #5
6,063.15 SF. AREA WIDTH
DEDICATED TO VILLAGE OF MORTON GROVE HEIGHT EACH SIDE EACH SIDE WIDTH LOT AREA 17,588 sq.ft. ( 0.404 acres) 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK HEIGHT N/A - compliant N/A - compliant DENSITY
SETBACK 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #5 CONTROL SETBACK EACH SIDE
6,661.44 SF. SETBACK SETBACK SIDEYARD AREA REAR YARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) PERMITTED DRIVEWAY MAXIMUM CONTROL COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE WIDTH FRONT YARD (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) MINIMUM LOT REAR YARD REAR YARD SIDE (EAST) HEIGHT COVERAGE MINIMUM LOT SIDE (WEST) DIMENSIONAL
7,357 SF. IMPERVIOUS WIDTH LOT AREA 17,588 sq.ft. ( 0.404 acres) REAR YARD FLOOR AREA MAX. BUILDING FRONT YARD SETBACK MINIMUM LOT SETBACK SETBACK HEIGHT DIMENSIONAL DENSITY MAX. BUILDING SETBACK LOT AREA 8,876 sq.ft. SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK
8,109 SF. CONTROL SETBACK EACH SIDE
REAR YARD A. VEER P.E. REAR YARD A. VEER P.E. SIDEYARD REAR YARD PERMITTED DRIVEWAY MAXIMUM MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS B. BONO P.E. B. BONO P.E. CONTROL COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE MAX. IMPERVIOUS FRONT YARD (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) W. HEPBURN W. HEPBURN MINIMUM LOT REAR YARD REAR YARD
SIDE (EAST) 30 FT 30 FT COVERAGE MIN 30 FT MIN 30 FT MINIMUM LOT SIDE (WEST) DIMENSIONAL IMPERVIOUS REAR YARD FLOOR AREA MAX. BUILDING
FRONT YARD N/A - compliant N/A - compliant MINIMUM LOT
DIMENSIONAL SETBACK SETBACK MAX. BUILDING
LOT AREA 8,876 sq.ft. (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) ( 4-UNIT TOWNHOUSE BUILDING) MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #6 & OUTLOT A (R3) MAX. BUILDING MAX. BUILDING DEDICATED TO VILLAGE MAX 28 FT 28 FT N/A - compliant MAX 28 FT 28 FT N/A - compliant ( 4-UNIT TOWNHOUSE BUILDING)
FOR PUBLIC STREET OF MORTON GROVE HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #6 & OUTLOT A (R3)
FOR PUBLIC STREET MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 50 % 50% N/A - compliant MAX 50 % 50% N/A - compliant N 00°00'55" W 213.00' REAR YARD N 00°00'55" W 213.00' REAR YARD S 89°12'39" W 131.53' S 89°12'39" W 131.53' (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 10,153 SF. COVERAGE COVERAGE PROJECT STAFF PROJECT STAFF
5,931.85 SF. 10,374.62 SF. 60% 60% N 86°33'14" E 81.82' MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 60 % N/A - compliant N 86°33'14" E 81.82' MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 60 % N/A - compliant
6,774.12 SF. 6,774.12 SF. 6,137.63 SF. COVERAGE (Sec; 12-4-2-D) COVERAGE (Sec; 12-4-2-D)
6,918 SF. TECHNICIAN: TECHNICIAN: PROJECT MANAGER: ENGINEER: ENGINEER: PROJECT MANAGER: ENGINEER: ENGINEER:
T/F 628.75 T/F 628.75
0 FT 3 FT 0 FT 3 FT DRIVEWAY Waiver of 3' DRIVEWAY Waiver of 3' SIDEYARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) SIDEYARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) SETBACK SETBACK
8,876 SF.
7,526.38 SF. ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #6 WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ REQUEST FOR LOT #2 REQUEST FOR LOT #2 Waiver of 3' Waiver of 3' I I 7,704.99 SF. Waiver of 6.16' N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant 7,990 SF. (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ REQUEST FOR LOT #2 REQUEST FOR LOT #2 Waiver of 3' Waiver of 3'
N Waiver of 6.16' (847) 823-3303 (847) 823-3303 N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N N/A - compliant ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #6 & OUTLOT A (R3) LOT AREA 7,526.38 sq.ft. (0.173 ACRES) 10,105 SF. ( 4-UNIT TOWNHOUSE BUILDING) 10,814.80 SF. [email protected] [email protected] PH : (847) 823-3300 FAX: DIMENSIONAL PH : (847) 823-3300 FAX: (0.183 ACRES) (0.186 ACRES) 60% 60% 50% 50% 28 FT 28 FT 25 FT 25 FT 50 FT 50 FT
3 FT 3 FT WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ 30 FT 30 FT REQUIRED
REQUIRED REQUIRED PROPOSED C CONTROL C PER 1 INIT PER 1 INIT 5,900 SQ.FT. 997 SF. LOT AREA 17,588 sq.ft.5,900 SQ.FT. ( 0.404 acres) REQUEST FOR LOT #2 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH (0.183 ACRES) (0.186 ACRES) 60% 50% 60% 50% 28 FT 25 FT 28 FT 25 FT 50 FT 50 FT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 3 FT 3 FT 30 FT 30 FT REQUIRED REQUIRED PER 1 INIT PER 1 INIT 5,900 SQ.FT. 5,900 SQ.FT. 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH CIVIL ENGINEERS CIVIL ENGINEERS (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) DIMENSIONAL(Sec; 12-4-2-D) PROPOSED REQUIRED WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ MINIMUM LOT S 00°00'00" E 600.07' (M) 600.30' (R) S 00°00'00" E 600.07' (M) 600.30' (R) 5,900 SQ.FT. CONTROL REQUEST FOR LOT #1 7,526.38 SQ.FT. LINCOLN AVENUE B AREA PER 1 INIT N/A - compliant B 65 FT 0 FT 0 FT
LINCOLN AVENUE 7,990 SQ.FT. 43.84 FT 25 FT 25 FT MAX 60 % MAX 60 % MAX 50 % MAX 50 % MIN 30 FT MIN 30 FT
5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH MINIMUM LOT MAX 28 FT MAX 28 FT 50 FT BONO CONSULTING, INC. BONO CONSULTING, INC. 65 FT 8,109 SQ.FT. 43.84 FT
PROPOSED PROPOSED Waiver of 6.16' 0 FT MAXIMUM 0 FT N 86°33'14" E 81.82' 4 units on 16 units per acre WIDTH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 7,990 SQ.FT. 43.84 FT 25 FT 25 FT MIN 30 FT MAX 60 % MAX 50 % MIN 30 FT MAX 60 % MAX 50 % 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH PERMITTED MAX 28 FT MAX 28 FT
(Sec; 12-4-2-D) 8,109 SQ.FT. PROPOSED PROPOSED 0.404 acres lot N/A - compliant FRONT YARD N 86°33'14" E 81.82' DENSITY 25 FT 25 FT N/A - compliant ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #1 (R2) ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #3 ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #1 (R2) ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #3 SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) MINIMUM LOT 60 FT PARK RIDGE, IL 60068 PARK RIDGE, IL 60068 81.61 FT N/A - compliant 1018 BUSSE HIGHWAY 1018 BUSSE HIGHWAY WIDTH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) EACH SIDE 5 FT EACH (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) (LOTZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #3 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #4 (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) 5 FT EACH N/A - compliant AREA AREA
WIDTH WIDTH SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) HEIGHT HEIGHT SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK FRONT YARD SETBACK 25 FT SETBACK
ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #3 20 FT ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #4 CONTROL CONTROL SETBACK SETBACK EACH SIDE EACH SIDE SIDEYARD SIDEYARD AREA AREA Waiver of 5' REAR YARD REAR YARD LOT AREA 7,357 sq.ft. (0.169 ACRES) LOT AREA 7,990 sq.ft. (0.183 ACRES) DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY LOT AREA 6,661.44 sq.ft. (0.153 ACRES) LOT AREA 7,704.99 sq.ft. (0.177 ACRES) COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE WIDTH WIDTH
FRONT YARD (Sec;FRONT YARD 12-4-2-D) REAR YARD
(LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) SETBACK
ZONING OVERALL ANALYSIS MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT ZONING OVERALL ANALYSIS REAR YARD REAR YARD HEIGHT HEIGHT MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONAL DIMENSIONAL MAX. BUILDING MAX. BUILDING SETBACK SETBACK MIN 30 FT 30 FT SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK N/A - compliant LOT AREA 7,990 sq.ft. LOT AREA 8,109 sq.ft. SETBACK CONTROL CONTROL SETBACK SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) EACH SIDE EACH SIDE SIDEYARD SIDEYARD REAR YARD REAR YARD DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS SIDE (WEST) MAX. IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE FRONT YARD FRONT YARD 5 FT (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT REAR YARD REAR YARD MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONAL DIMENSIONAL 13.6 FT N/A - compliant MAX. BUILDING DIMENSIONAL DIMENSIONAL MAX. BUILDING (Sec; 12-4-2-D) DIMENSIONAL DIMENSIONAL
LOT AREA 7,990 sq.ft. SETBACK LOT AREA 8,109 sq.ft. MAX. BUILDING PROPOSED REQUIRED WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ PROPOSED REQUIRED WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ PROPOSED REQUIRED WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ PROPOSED REQUIRED WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ MAX 28 FT 28 FT MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS CONTROL CONTROL MAX. IMPERVIOUS CONTROL CONTROL ORDINANCE ORDINANCE HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliant DIMENSION REQUEST FOR LOT #2 REQUEST FOR LOT #2 SIDE (EAST) DIMENSION5 FT REQUEST FOR LOT #2 REQUEST FOR LOT #2 REQUIREMENTS PROPOSED 27.6 FT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliantREQUIREMENTS PROPOSED AT CONTROL SETBACK AT CONTROL MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 50 % 50% N/A - compliant REAR YARD 30 FT REAR YARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT 69.8 FT N/A - compliant MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT 5,900 SQ.FT. 5,900 SQ.FT. SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 5,900 SQ.FT. 5,900 SQ.FT. COVERAGE LOT SIZE FOR 1 ACRE MINIMUM 1.56081 acres AREA 7,357 SQ.FT. AREA 7,990 SQ.FT. LOT SIZE FOR 1 ACRE MINIMUM 1.56081 acres AREA 6,661.44 SQ.FT. AREA 7,704.99 SQ.FT. PER 1 INIT N/A - compliant PER 1 INIT N/A - compliant 35 FT PER 1 INIT N/A - compliant PER 1 INIT N/A - compliant (Sec.12-6-3 ) MAX. BUILDING 30 FT (Sec.12-6-3 ) 60% PUD ELIGIBILITY (Sec;PUD 12-4-2-D) ELIGIBILITYN/A - compliant MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 60 % N/A - compliant HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) MINIMUM LOT 50 FT MINIMUM LOT 50 FT MINIMUM LOT 50 FT MINIMUM LOT 50 FT COVERAGE 43.84 FT Waiver of 6.16' 43.84 FT Waiver of 6.16' 0.6 (10,553 SF) 43.84 FT Waiver of 6.16' 43.84 FT Waiver of 6.16' WIDTH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) WIDTH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) FLOOR AREA 0.652(11460 SF) Waiver of 907 SF WIDTH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) WIDTH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 9 DWELLING UNIT PER 1 ACRE (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 9 DWELLING UNIT PER 1 ACRE MAXIMUM FRONT YARD FRONT YARD MAXIMUM FRONT YARD FRONT YARD 25 FT 25 FT T/F 628.75N/A - compliant 25 FT 25 FT N/A - compliant 25 FT 25 FT N/A - compliant 25 FT 25 FT N/A - compliant 0 FT 3 FT DENSITY 4 TOWNHOUSES plus SETBACK SETBACK IMPERVIOUS DENSITY 4 TOWNHOUSES plus SETBACK SETBACK DRIVEWAY Waiver of 3' 5 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 73.73 % 65% Waiver of 8.73% 6 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 10,105 SF. 10,105 COVERAGE SIDEYARD EACH SIDE T/F 628.75 EACH SIDE (Sec; 12-4-2-D) EACH SIDE EACH SIDE 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH N/A - compliant 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH N/A - compliant 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH N/A - compliant 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH N/A - compliant SETBACK
MAXIMUM SF. 10,105 MAXIMUM SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) MAX. IMPERVIOUS SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) IMPERVIOUS LOT 65% MAXIMUM ...... 61.10% 6,774.12 SF. 51.84 % IMPERVIOUS50% LOTWaiver of 65%1.84% MAXIMUM ...... 61.10% REAR YARD REAR YARD REAR YARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) REAR YARD REAR YARD COVERAGE MIN 30 FT 30 FT 6,774.12 SF. MIN 30 FT 30 FT COVERAGE MIN 30 FT 30 FT MIN 30 FT 30 FT SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliant SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliant COVERAGE SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliant SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliant ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #7 & OUTLOT A (R3) OPEN SPACE MAX. BUILDING MAX. BUILDING OPEN SPACE MAX. BUILDING MAX. BUILDING ( 4-UNIT TOWNHOUSE BUILDING) COVERAGE 35% MINIMUM ...... 38.90% MAX 28 FT 28 FT N/A - compliant MAX 28 FT 28 FT N/A - compliant COVERAGE 35% MINIMUM ...... 38.90% MAX 28 FT 28 FT N/A - compliant MAX 28 FT 28 FT N/A - compliant WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ REQUEST FOR LOT #2 REQUEST FOR LOT #2 Waiver of 3' HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) Waiver of 3' HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) Waiver of 6.16' Waiver of 6.16' N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ REQUEST FOR LOT #2 REQUEST FOR LOT #2 Waiver of 3' MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS Waiver of 3' MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS LOT AREA 17,589 sq.ft. ( 0.404 acres) Waiver of 6.16' 50% N/A - compliant 50% N/A - compliant Waiver of 6.16' 50% N/A - compliant 50% N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant N/A - compliant MAX 50 % MAX 50 % N/A - compliant MAX 50 % MAX 50 % REAR YARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) REAR YARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) REAR YARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) REAR YARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE DIMENSIONAL PROPOSED REQUIRED WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ CONTROL
(0.169 ACRES) (0.159 ACRES) REQUEST FOR LOT #1 60% 50% 60% 60% 60% 50% 60% 60% N/A - compliant 28 FT 28 FT
N/A - compliant 25 FT N/A - compliant 25 FT N/A - compliant 50 FT MAX 60 % MAX 60 % 50 FT MAX 60 % MAX 60 % 3 FT MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS 3 FT MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS 30 FT 30 FT REQUIRED REQUIRED PER 1 INIT PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS PER 1 INIT PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS 5,900 SQ.FT. COVERAGE (Sec; 12-4-2-D) COVERAGE 5,900 SQ.FT. (Sec; 12-4-2-D) COVERAGE (Sec; 12-4-2-D) COVERAGE (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH (0.169 ACRES) (0.159 ACRES) 60% 50% 60% 50% 28 FT 25 FT 28 FT 25 FT 50 FT 50 FT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D)
3 FT 3 FT N 00°00'55" W 213.00' W 00°00'55" N 30 FT 30 FT REQUIRED REQUIRED PER 1 INIT PER 1 INIT 5,900 SQ.FT. 5,900 SQ.FT. 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH MAXIMUM (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) CALCULATED POARKING PROVIDED 213.00' W 00°00'55" N CALCULATED POARKING PROVIDED 4 units on 16 units per acre REQUIREMENTS 0 FT 3 FT 0 FT 3 FT REQUIREMENTS 0 FT 3 FT 0 FT 3 FT PERMITTED PARKING DEMAND MEDINA GARDENS DRIVEWAY Waiver of 3' DRIVEWAY Waiver of 3' PARKING DEMAND MEDINA GARDENS DRIVEWAY Waiver of 3' DRIVEWAY Waiver of 3' (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliant (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) DENSITY 0.404 acres lot USE TOWNHOUSE PROPOSAL SIDEYARD SIDEYARD USE TOWNHOUSE PROPOSAL SIDEYARD SIDEYARD SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK MINIMUM LOT 60 FT 0 FT 0 FT 81.61 FT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliant
7,357 SQ.FT. 6,918 SQ.FT. WIDTH 43.84 FT 43.84 FT 25 FT 25 FT MAX 60 % MAX 60 % MIN 30 FT MIN 30 FT MAX 50 % MAX 50 % 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH MAX 28 FT MAX 28 FT
4 x 2= 8 SPACES PROPOSED PROPOSED 4 x 2= 8 SPACES 0 FT 2 SPACES PER 1 DWELLING 8 GARAGE SPACES 2 SPACES PER 1 DWELLING 0 FT 8 GARAGE SPACES 4 TOWNHOUSES 4 TOWNHOUSES FRONT YARD
7,357 SQ.FT. 6,918 SQ.FT. 25 FT 43.84 FT 43.84 FT 25 FT 25 FT MAX 60 % MAX 50 % MIN 30 FT MIN 30 FT MAX 60 % MAX 50 % 20 FT 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH MAX 28 FT UNIT MAX 28 FT UNIT 4 VISITOR SPACES 4 VISITOR SPACES SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) Waiver of 5' PROPOSED PROPOSED 5 LOT ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #2 ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #4 6 LOT ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #2 ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #4 SIDE (WEST) 2 SPACES PER 1 DWELLING 10 GARAGE SPACES 2 SPACES PER 1 DWELLING 12 GARAGE SPACES 13.6 FT 5 FT N/A - compliant RESIDENTIAL 5 x 2= 10 SPACES RESIDENTIAL 6 x 2= 12 SPACES SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) UNIT 10 VISITOR SPACES UNIT 6 VISITOR SPACES
DEVELOPMENT (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #2 DEVELOPMENT (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) AREA AREA
WIDTH WIDTH SIDE (EAST)
HEIGHT HEIGHT 5 FT SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK 27.6 FT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliant ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #2 CONTROL CONTROL SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK EACH SIDE EACH SIDE ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #1 (R2) SIDEYARD TOTAL PROPOSED: 32 SPACES SIDEYARD TOTAL PROPOSED: 30 SPACES REAR YARD REAR YARD AREA TOTAL REQUIRED: 18 SPACES (0.159 ACRES) (0.186 ACRES) AREA TOTAL REQUIRED: 20 SPACES (0.141 ACRES) (0.139 ACRES) DRIVEWAY LOT AREA 6,918 sq.ft. LOT AREA 8,109 sq.ft. DRIVEWAY LOT AREA 6,137.63 sq.ft. LOT AREA 6,137.63 sq.ft. COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE WIDTH WIDTH FRONT YARD FRONT YARD (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT REAR YARD REAR YARD HEIGHT HEIGHT MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONAL DIMENSIONAL MAX. BUILDING MAX. BUILDING SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK LOT AREA 6,918 sq.ft.
LOT AREA 7,357 sq.ft. REAR YARD 30 FT CONTROL CONTROL SETBACK SETBACK EACH SIDE EACH SIDE ZONING OVERVIEW - LOT #1 (R2) SIDEYARD SIDEYARD REAR YARD REAR YARD 69.8 FT DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE N/A - compliant FRONT YARD FRONT YARD (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) (LOT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT REAR YARD REAR YARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT SETBACK DIMENSIONAL DIMENSIONAL MAX. BUILDING DIMENSIONAL DIMENSIONAL MAX. BUILDING DIMENSIONAL DIMENSIONAL LOT AREA 6,918 sq.ft. CONTROL PROPOSED REQUIRED WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ CONTROL PROPOSED REQUIREDLOT AREA 7,357 sq.ft. WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ CONTROL PROPOSED REQUIRED WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ CONTROL PROPOSED REQUIRED WAIVER/SPECIAL USE/ MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX. BUILDING 30 FT 35 FT REQUEST FOR LOT #2 REQUEST FOR LOT #2 REQUEST FOR LOT #2 REQUEST FOR LOT #2 N/A - compliant PROPOSED SUBDIVIDED LOTS PROPOSED SUBDIVIDED LOTS HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 0.6 (10,553 SF) LOT NO. AREA SQ. FT. / ACRE No of UNITS / LOT LOT NO. AREA SQ. FT. / ACRE No of UNITS / LOT FLOOR AREA 0.652(11460 SF) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) Waiver of 907 SF MINIMUMN 89°59'05" LOT E 50.01' MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT / 5,900 SQ.FT. 5,900 SQ.FT. / 5,900 SQ.FT. 5,900 SQ.FT. LOT 1 7,357 0.169 1 AREA 6,918 SQ.FT. AREA 8,109 SQ.FT. LOT 1 6,661.44 0.153 1 AREA 6,137.63 SQ.FT. AREA 6,137.63 SQ.FT. NPER 89°59'05" 1 INIT N/A E- compliant 50.01' PER 1 INIT N/A - compliant PER 1 INIT N/A - compliant PER 1 INIT N/A - compliant IMPERVIOUS LOT 2 6,918 / 0.159 1 LOT 2 6,137.63 / 0.141 1 73.73 % 65% Waiver of 8.73% COVERAGE (Sec; 12-4-2-D) MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT 50 FT MINIMUM LOT MINIMUM LOT LOT 3 7,990 / 0.183 1 43.84 FT 50 FT Waiver of 6.16' 65 FT N/A - compliant LOT 3 7,704.99 / 0.177 1 43.84 FT 50 FT Waiver of 6.16' 43.84 FT 50 FT Waiver of 6.16' WIDTH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) WIDTH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) WIDTH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) WIDTH (Sec; 12-4-2-D) MAX. IMPERVIOUS 51.84 % 50% Waiver of 1.84% LOT 4 8,109 / 0.186 1 LOT 4 6,063.15 / 0.140 1 REAR YARD FRONT YARD FRONT YARD FRONT YARD FRONT YARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 25 FT 25 FT N/A - compliant 25 FT 25 FT N/A - compliant 25 FT 25 FT N/A - compliant 25 FT 25 FT N/A - compliant COVERAGE LOT 5 8,876 / 0.204 1 SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) LOT 5 5,931.85 / 0.136 1 SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) LOT 6 & OUTLOT A 17,588 / 0.404 4 EACH SIDE EACH SIDE LOT 6 7,526.38 / 0.173 1 EACH SIDE EACH SIDE 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH N/A - compliant 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH N/A - compliant 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH N/A - compliant 5 FT EACH 5 FT EACH N/A - compliant OUTLOT B 997 / 0.023 - SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) LOT 7 & OUTLOT 17,588.92 / 0404 4 SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) - - REAR YARD REAR YARD 1 1 1 1 1 4 9 REAR YARD REAR YARD CUL-DE-SAC 10,153 / 0.233 - MIN 30 FT 30 FT MIN 30 FT 30 FT CUL-DE-SAC 10,374.62 / 0.238 - MIN 30 FT 30 FT MIN 30 FT 30 FT SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliant SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliant SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliant SETBACK (Sec; 12-4-2-D) N/A - compliant - - 1 1 1 1 1 4 9 TOTAL 67,988.95 / 1.561 9 No of UNITS / LOT TOTAL 67,988.95 / 1.561 10
MAX. BUILDING 5 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES MAX. BUILDING
MAX. BUILDING 8 GARAGE SPACES 4 VISITOR SPACES MAX. BUILDING MEDINA GARDENS MAX 28 FT 28 FT MAX 28 FT 28 FT 10 GARAGE SPACES 10 VISITOR SPACES MAX 28 FT 28 FT MAX 28 FT 28 FT
N/A - compliant N/A - compliant No of UNITS / LOT N/A - compliant N/A - compliant POARKING PROVIDED HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) TOWNHOUSE PROPOSAL HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) HEIGHT (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 5 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 8 GARAGE SPACES 4 VISITOR SPACES MEDINA GARDENS TOTAL PROPOSED: 32 SPACES 10 GARAGE SPACES 10 VISITOR SPACES POARKING PROVIDED MAX. IMPERVIOUS TOWNHOUSE PROPOSAL MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 50 % 50% N/A - compliant MAX 50 % 50% N/A - compliant MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 50 % 50% N/A - compliant MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 50 % 50% N/A - compliant REAR YARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) REAR YARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) TOTAL PROPOSED: 32 SPACES REAR YARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) REAR YARD (Sec; 12-4-2-D) COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE COVERAGE 8,109 SF. 8,876 SF. PROPOSED 1.56081 acres
60% 60% 61.10% 38.90% 60% 60% MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 60 % N/A - compliant 8,876MAX. SF. IMPERVIOUS MAX 60 % N/A - compliant MEDINA GARDENS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 60 % N/A - compliant MAX. IMPERVIOUS MAX 60 % N/A - compliant MEDINA GARDENS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
8,109 SF. PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN & GEOMETRIC PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN & GEOMETRIC
(Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D)9 DWELLING UNIT PER 1 ACRE (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) COVERAGE COVERAGE PROPOSED COVERAGE COVERAGE 1.56081 acres 61.10% 38.90% 9 DWELLING UNIT PER 1 ACRE 4 TOWNHOUSES plus CALCULATED ...... 0.233 0.169 0.159 0.183 0.186 0.204 0.404 0.023 1.561 PARKING DEMAND 4 x 2= 8 SPACES 0 FT 3 FT Waiver of 3' 0 FT 3 FT Waiver of 3' 4 TOWNHOUSES plus 0 FT 3 FT Waiver of 3' 0 FT 3 FT Waiver of 3' 5 x 2= 10 SPACES CALCULATED
DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY ACRE DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY ...... 0.233 (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D) 0.169 0.159 0.183 0.186 0.204 0.404 0.023 1.561 (Sec; 12-4-2-D) (Sec; 12-4-2-D)
SIDEYARD SIDEYARD PARKING DEMAND SIDEYARD SIDEYARD 4 x 2= 8 SPACES 5 x 2= 10 SPACES ACRE 6021-6037 LINCOLN, MORTON GROVE, COOK COUNTY, IL 6021-6037 LINCOLN, MORTON GROVE, COOK COUNTY, IL / SETBACK SETBACK / / / / / / / / SETBACK SETBACK / / / / / / / / / COPYRIGHT: COPYRIGHT: THIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE USED, THIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE USED, TOTAL REQUIRED: 18 SPACES 997 REPRODUCED, MODIFIED OR SOLD EITHER REPRODUCED, MODIFIED OR SOLD EITHER 7,357 6,918 7,990 8,109 8,876 WHOLLY OR IN PART, EXCEPT WHEN WHOLLY OR IN PART, EXCEPT WHEN 10,153 17,588 TOTAL REQUIRED: 18 SPACES 997 AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER. AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER. 67,988.95 7,357 6,918 7,990 8,109 8,876 AREA SQ. FT. / 10,153 17,588 67,988.95 35% MINIMUM AREA SQ. FT. / 65% MAXIMUM PROJECT NUMBER: 17239 PROJECT NUMBER: 17239 UNIT UNIT ORDINANCE 35% MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENTS 65% MAXIMUM & 5 TO BE DETERMINED ONCE LOTS ARE CONCEPTUAL PLANS. (Sec.12-6-3 ) EXACT BUILDING FOOT PRINT FOR LOT 1, 2, 3, 4, PURCHASED. BUILDING SHOWN ARE UNIT UNIT
1 ACRE MINIMUM START DATE: JUN. 10, 2017 START DATE: JUN. 10, 2017 ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENTS & 5 TO BE DETERMINED ONCE LOTS ARE CONCEPTUAL PLANS. (Sec.12-6-3 ) EXACT BUILDING FOOT PRINT FOR LOT 1, 2, 3, 4, PURCHASED. BUILDING SHOWN ARE 2 SPACES PER 1 DWELLING 2 SPACES PER 1 DWELLING
1 ACRE MINIMUM S 00°00'00" E 600.07' (M) 600.30' (R) 600.30' (M) 600.07' E 00°00'00" S 2 SPACES PER 1 DWELLING
2 SPACES PER 1 DWELLING S 00°00'00" E 600.07' (M) 600.30' (R) 600.30' (M) 600.07' E 00°00'00" S LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 5 OUTLOT B TOTAL CUL-DE-SAC PROPOSED SUBDIVIDED LOTS LOT NO. SCALE: 1"=30'-0 SCALE: 1"=30'-0 5 LOT USE LOT 6 & OUTLOT A PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 5 ZONING OVERALL ANALYSIS OUTLOT B DENSITY TOTAL MAXIMUM MAXIMUM CUL-DE-SAC PROPOSED SUBDIVIDED LOTS LOT NO.
COVERAGE COVERAGE 997 SF. 997
RESIDENTIAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET NUMBER OPEN SPACE DIMENSION 5 LOT USE LOT SIZE FOR AT CONTROL LOT 6 & OUTLOT A PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS DEVELOPMENT ZONING OVERALL ANALYSIS DENSITY IMPERVIOUS LOT MAXIMUM PUD ELIGIBILITY MAXIMUM 4 TOWNHOUSES
COVERAGE COVERAGE 997 SF. 997 RESIDENTIAL OPEN SPACE DIMENSION LOT SIZE FOR AT CONTROL DEVELOPMENT IMPERVIOUS LOT PUD ELIGIBILITY 4 TOWNHOUSES OF OF DEDICATED TO VILLAGE 14 - 14 - OF MORTON GROVE DEDICATED TO VILLAGE FOR PUBLIC STREET OF MORTON GROVE N 00°00'55" W 383.95' W 00°00'55" N 10,153 SF. FOR PUBLIC STREET
N 00°00'55" W 383.95' W 00°00'55" N 10,153 SF.
7,990 SF. 7,990 SF. 7,357 SF. 6,918 SF. 7,357 SF. 6,918 SF.
S 89°12'39" W 131.53' S 89°12'39" W 131.53'
Village of Morton Grove Department of Community & Economic Development
To: Chairperson Blonz and Members of the Plan Commission
From: Zoe Heidorn, Land Use Planner/Coordinator
Date: July 15, 2020
Re: PC 20-08 - 6250 Dempster Street (10-17-305-007-0000) Request for approval of a Special Use Permit for a Recreation Facility to allow improvement of the Harrer aquatic facility, with a waiver to Section 12-2-2 for maximum number of accessory structures permitted on a zoning lot
STAFF REPORT
Public Notice The Village of Morton Grove provided public notice for the July 20, 2020, Plan Commission public hearing for PC 20-08 in accordance with the Unified Development Code. The Morton Grove Champion published a public notice on July 2, 2020. The Village mailed letters on June 30, 2020, notifying surrounding property owners, and placed a public notice sign on the subject property on June 22, 2020.
Application Summary On June 8, 2020, the Morton Grove Park District submitted a complete application to the Department of Community and Economic Development requesting approval of a Special Use Permit to authorize the planned reconstruction and alteration of a not-for-profit recreation facility, in accordance with Section 12-4-2:C of the Morton Grove Unified Development Code (Title 12). The recreation facility is the existing Harrer Park Pool, which is located within a 12.8-acre lot at 6250 Dempster Street and is zoned within an R1 Single Family Residence District. The subject property is outlined in the location map provided below.
The subject property is part of a larger property owned and operated by the Morton Grove Park District, which also contains Harrer Park, the Morton Grove Historical Museum, and accessory parking areas. The subject property is currently improved with a gazebo, the Harrer Park Pool and bathhouse, a parks service center, and the Harrer Park shelter, a playground, sports fields, open lawns, and various landscape areas.
The existing Harrer Park Pool was constructed in 1962 and renovated in 1995. In 2017, the Park District conducted a structural assessment and determined the existing facility to be beyond repair. Following the 2019 summer swimming season, the pool in its existing state was permanently closed to the public. In May of 2020, taxpayers to the Morton Grove Park Subject Property Location Map District voted by referendum to approve a limiting rate increase to fund the renovation, redevelopment, PC 20-08 – 6250 Dempster Street July 15, 2020 operation, and maintenance of Harrer Park Pool. The Park District is now requesting a Special Use Permit from the Village to allow for the reconstruction and alteration of Harrer Park Pool, the bathhouse, surrounding grounds, and associated parking facilities.
Per Section 12-4-2:C, A Special Use Permit is required for not-for-profit recreation facilities in an R1 Single Family Residence District. Because the site development predates the Unified Development Code, the current use has been operating without a Special Use Permit. While operation of the non-conforming use has been legally protected by Chapter 12-15, Nonconformities, the proposed structural alternation of the use will terminate its protected status. As such, the Morton Grove Park District is seeking approval of a Special Use Permit for the recreation facility, after-the-fact. An identical process of approval was required for reconstruction of the Oriole Park Pool, approved in 2013 under Case PC 13-06.
The Applicant is proposing full reconstruction of Harrer Park Pool and associated facilities. The proposed site plan includes a 6-lane, 50-meter lap pool, a deep pool, a plunge pool, a spray ground, a tot pool, a concessions deck, a bathhouse, a filtration building, and an enclosed trash area. The 6,370-square-foot bathhouse will include a concessions stand, party room, and main entrance. The proposed structures comply with all dimensional requirements of the R1 District. New landscaping and the repavement of existing parking facilities located within the subject property and to the immediate east are also proposed.
Surrounding Properties Properties to the south of the subject property, across Dempster Street, are zoned in a C1 General Commercial District. These properties are improved with commercial structures occupied by Seoul Barbershop, 5000 Years Carom Billiards, and Simkins Funeral Home. Two lots abut the subject property to the east: (1) a lot zoned in the R1 District, under Park District ownership, and operated as a Park District parking lot and the Morton Grove Historical Museum, and (2) a lot zoned in a C1 District, under Park District ownership, and operated as a Park District parking lot and open space. To the north of the subject property is Park View Elementary School, located on property also zoned within the R1 District. To the west is R1-zoned property owned and operated by the Cook County Forest Preserve District.
Development Review The development review considers the Harrer Park Pool redevelopment area to be within a separate zoning lot as Harrer Park to the north. Per Section 12-17-1, a zoning lot is defined as a parcel of land composed of whole or partial lots of record used for a principal building or principal use. The principal use of the Harrer Park Pool zoning lot is a recreational facility, whereas the principal use of Harrer Park is a publicly owned park and playground, a Permitted Use within the R1 District. For the purpose of providing delineation between the two zoning lots, staff determined the northern boundary of the subject zoning lot to be the southern edge of the existing path located just north of the Harrer Park Pool site, projected due west to the western side lot line. The principal structure is considered to be the bathhouse, including both north and south wings, which are connected by a canopy and trellis. All other structures on the zoning lot are deemed accessory, including the gazebo, filtration building, plunge pool slides, and deep pool platform and diving boards.
The proposed development meets all dimensional standards of the R1 Single Family Residence District. The following table provides a comparison of proposed development on the residential zoning lot against applicable dimensional controls:
Dimensional Control Requirement Proposed Compliance R1 District Requirements Front Yard (Dempster Street) Min. 25 ft. 147.25 ft. Compliant (12-4-2:D) East: 81.42 ft. Interior Side Yard Min. 6 ft. West: 84.08 ft. Compliant (12-4-2:D) Min. 14 ft. combined Combined: 165.50 ft. Rear Yard Min. 30 ft. Approx. 98 ft. Compliant (12-4-2:D) Floor Area Ratio Max. 0.60 0.04 Compliant
2 PC 20-08 – 6250 Dempster Street July 15, 2020
(12-4-2:D) Building Height Max. 35 ft. 18.5 ft. Compliant (12-4-2:D) Impermeable Lot Coverage Max. 55% 47.2% Compliant (12-4-2:D) Accessory Structure Requirements Waiver requested to eliminate restriction on > 2 detached accessory Max. 2 per zoning lot number of detached structures accessory structures Permitted within side Gazebo located within front allowed and rear yards Detached Accessory yard, filtration building located Existing gazebo protected Structures Min. 3 ft. from side within rear yard as legal-nonconforming (12-2-2:B; 12-2-5) and rear lot lines > 3 ft. from side and rear lot structure, all other Min. 10 ft. from lines structures compliant
principal structure > 10 ft. from principal structure Compliant
Compliant Permitted within side Fencing Fencing located within side and and rear yards, max. Compliant (12-3-5) rear yards, will not exceed 6 ft. height 6 ft.
As shown in the table above, the only waiver required to approve the plan as presented is as follows:
• Section 12-2-2:B: Waiver to eliminate the restriction on number of detached accessory structures allowed on a zoning lot.
Considering the size of the zoning lot and the nature of the use as a recreational facility, staff does not believe limiting the number of detached accessory structures on the site will provide any advantage. Eliminating the restriction on quantity of detached accessory structures permitted will allow the Applicant greater flexibility in facility design as the site plan is finalized. Currently, detached accessory structures include the filtration building, existing gazebo, and all above-ground pool features, including slides, diving boards, platforms, and various permanent fixtures. Final design and quantity of pool features must be substantially consistent with the site plan approved under the Special Use Permit, and will be subject to staff review and approval.
Building Appearance & Landscape Plan On July 6, the Appearance Commission unanimously approved an Appearance Certificate for the proposed building elevations, site plan, and landscape plan with one associated waiver, and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the Plan Commission. A staff report to the Appearance Commission is included in the hearing packet for PC 20-08.
At the July 6 meeting, Williams Architects/Aquatics presented colored elevations, renderings, and material specifications for buildings proposed as part of the Harrer Park Pool reconstruction project. The Applicant’s consultants explained that the building and materials palette were designed to provide a modern and open feel, while complementing existing structures within the Park District and Village complex. Material and design cues were taken from both the Morton Grove Historical Museum and the Morton Grove Civic Center.
The consultants noted that in lieu of the metal standing seam roof proposed in the submitted elevations, a PVC roof in the same color and designed to provide the appearance of a standing seam roof is being proposed. The consultants discussed the durability and maintenance of the proposed roof, and of other proposed materials.
Upland Design presented the landscape plan to the Appearance Commission and discussed the Applicant’s request for a waiver of six tree required to be planted within the adjacent public right-of-way. Per Section 12-11- 1:B.4, trees are required to be planted no less than 40 feet apart within any adjacent public right-of-way. With a frontage of 443 feet along Dempster Street, a total of 11 trees are required within the public parkway, where only
3 PC 20-08 – 6250 Dempster Street July 15, 2020 five trees currently. The Applicant explained that because existing trees located within the parkway and abutting front yard are mature, the planting of new trees in the same location might result in crowded planting conditions and threaten the viability of new tree plantings. The Appearance Commission approved the waiver, with the condition that six trees must be planted at alternative locations on the subject property.
Following the Appearance Commission meeting, the Applicant provided a revised landscape plan to staff that includes the six additional tree plantings, four of which will be located on the subject property and two of which will be located within the abutting public parkway. The final landscape plan will be subject to review by the Appearance Commission Chairperson. If he deems the plan to be inconsistent with the original landscape plan or the Appearance Commission’s conditions of approval, he may require full Commission review. The revised Proposed Locations of Six Additional Tree Plantings landscape plan is not included in the hearing packet for PC 20-08.
Parking Analysis Per Section 12-7-3:B of the Unified Development Code, proposed parking standards identified in the code as “Required Spaces By Use” shall be advisory for Special Use Permit applications, as required parking will be reviewed and established as part of the Special Use Permit. The final number of required parking spaces for Special Use Permits is determined by the Village Board based on the submitted, independent traffic and parking study and any recommendations made by the Traffic Safety Commission, Plan Commissions, and staff.
Based on square footage of all proposed uses associated with the Harrer Park Pool redevelopment project, the advisory parking requirement per Section 12-7-3:I of the Unified Development Code is 77 spaces. The table below provides an overview of the base parking requirement.
Use Size Parking Required Parking Requirement Lockers 1,725 sq. ft. 11.50 Pool Equipment 1,655 sq. ft. 11.03 Concessions 585 sq. ft. 1 space per 150 sq. ft. gross floor area 3.90 Family Toilets 140 sq. ft. 0.93 Circulation 2,275 sq. ft. 15.17 1 space per 3 persons at maximum occupancy Party Room 1,530 sq. ft. 34.00 (15 sq. ft. per person) Total Advisory Parking Requirement 77 spaces
In accordance with ordinance requirements for a Special Use Permit application (Section 12-7-3:B), the Applicant submitted a traffic and parking study prepared by Eriksson Engineering Associates, Ltd. Based on pool staffing, 2019 pool attendance data, and a projection of 21% growth in attendance, the study estimates a peak parking demand of 79 vehicles at 1:00 PM in the afternoon. For all uses at Harrer Park and Harrer Park Pool, the study estimates a peak demand of 287 spaces.
The Park District-owned parking lot to the immediate east of the Harrer Park Pool site will include 99 parking spaces after proposed restriping occurs, exceeding the peak parking demand of the pool use by 20 spaces. According to the Applicant, Harrer Park Pool users will also have access to several nearby parking areas operated by the Morton Grove Park District (MGPD), Village of Morton Grove (VMG), and Park View Elementary (PVE), including:
4 PC 20-08 – 6250 Dempster Street July 15, 2020
• MGPD - Harrer Park Pool lot located to the east of the development site – 99 spaces (to be increased from 79 after proposed restriping) • VMG - Village-owned parking lot – 66 spaces • MGPD - West service road parking – 75 spaces • MGPD - Harrer Park parking lot – 84 spaces • PVE - Lake Street parking row – 9 spaces • PVE - Park View Elementary School lot – 59 spaces
The various parking areas available to Harrer Park and Pool users are identified in the map to the right. Per the Applicant, Harrer Park and Pool users will have access to a total of 392 parking spaces, exceeding the total peak demand of 287 spaces by 105 spaces. The Lake Street public right-of-way dead-ends at the entrance of the Park View Elementary School lot, meaning all parking spaces identified above are considered off-street parking spaces.
An agreement executed in 2001 between the Village of Morton Grove and the Morton Grove Park District allows unrestricted cross- access and shared parking between parking lots serving the Harrer Park Pool, Morton Grove Historical Museum, and Morton Grove Civic Center. The agreement remains in effect for a period of 20 years and will renew for successive 20-year periods unless either party decides to terminate the agreement. The Village anticipates renewal of the agreement in 2021.
It is unclear whether the Morton Grove Park District has a similar agreement in place with Park View Elementary School. If the school-operated spaces are to be included in the overall available parking count, the Applicant should provide evidence of such an agreement, whether proposed or existing. If the Applicant is incorporating all shared parking into the parking analysis, the Applicant should also incorporate the parking requirements of all uses sharing these parking facilities, including the Morton Grove Historical Museum, the Morton Grove Civic Center, and Park View Elementary School.
While the Applicant has sufficient parking to meet the peak demand of 79 spaces, the traffic and parking impact study will need to be updated to clarify how parking spaces are shared between adjacent public uses.
Access & Circulation Vehicular access to Harrer Park Pool is provided at four locations: (1) a driveway at a signalized intersection along Dempster Street at Fernald Avenue, (2) a driveway along Dempster Street at Georgiana Avenue, which provides vehicular access through the abutting Village-owned property, (3) a driveway along Dempster Street at Lake Street (a private service drive), and (4) Lake Street access from the north, which wraps around Harrer Park and becomes a public east-west roadway at the northeast corner of the property. No significant changes are being proposed to the existing vehicular access points.
Pedestrian access to Harrer Park Pool is expected to improve as a result of the proposed site plan. Unlike the existing bathhouse, which is oriented along an east-west axis to the north of the zoning lot, the proposed bathhouse is oriented along a north-south axis and will be situated between aquatic features to the west and the parking lot to the east. The Harrer Park Pool pedestrian entrance and bathhouse will be located much closer to the adjacent parking lot located to the east.
Trash Enclosure A trash enclosure is located just west of the proposed filtration building, with vehicular access provided along the existing service drive and an extension of the service drive leading to the filtration building. The enclosure will be landscaped and will meet the minimum requirements for screening established by Section 12-11-4.
5 PC 20-08 – 6250 Dempster Street July 15, 2020
Stormwater Management The proposed development is subject to Metropolitan Water Reclamation District (MWRD) and Village stormwater detention and volume control requirements. The Applicant submitted a stormwater report prepared by Eriksson Engineering Associates, Ltd. The report calculates an area of disturbance measuring 2.85 acres, which includes the Harrer Park Pool site and much of the Park District-owned parking area to the east. A detention basin located to the south of the pool grounds will provide volume control in accordance with MWRD and Village requirements. Volume control will capture a volume equal to one inch of stormwater runoff from all impervious surfaces of the area of disturbance. According to the stormwater report, the basin is calculated to store nearly 300,000 gallons of stormwater, which will be released to the public sewer system at a restricted rate.
Departmental Review Fire Department The Fire Prevention Bureau Coordinator found no issues with the proposed project. The final development design will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable life safety requirements through the permitting process.
Building Department The Manager of Building and Inspectional Services found no issues with the proposed project. The final development design will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable building code requirements through the permitting process.
Public Works/Engineering The Village Engineer provided a list of 11 comments in review of the proposed development, dated June 15, 2020, and included in the hearing packet for PC 20-08. A proposed condition of Special Use Permit approval is compliance with all comments and recommendations provided by the Village Engineer, whether by strict compliance or alternative compliance, subject to the Village Engineer’s final approval.
Commission Review Traffic Safety Commission On July 2, 2020, the Applicant appeared before the Traffic Safety Commission (TSC) to provide testimony and respond to staff comments issued to the TSC. At the meeting, the TSC and Applicant discussed the following:
• The Applicant responded to the Village Engineer’s comment that the enhanced pool facility and recent closure of the Leaning Tower YMCA may contribute to increased pool attendance. The Applicant stated that the study includes an anticipated increase of 21% in pool attendance, by comparison with attendance data collected in recent years. The Applicant also explained that because the YMCA is membership based and attracts year-round indoor users, impact from the facility’s closure is expected to be minimal. • The Applicant responded to the Engineer’s comment that an estimated four persons per vehicle seems to be a generous figure. The Applicant explained that the number was based on attendance data and parking counts, and might actually be higher than four persons in some cases. The presenters noted that the high figure is indicative of the fact that many pool users walk or ride their bicycles to the pool, which are feasible modes of transportation to a neighborhood pool that abuts residential districts.
After hearing the Applicant’s presentation and testimony, the TSC voted unanimously to forward a recommendation of approval of case PC 20-08 to the Plan Commission. The TSC forwarded no comments to the Plan Commission.
Appearance Commission On July 6, 2020, the Appearance Commission unanimously approved an Appearance Certificate with one landscape waiver and forwarded a recommendation of approval of case PC 20-08 to the Plan Commission. The following comments were forwarded to the Plan Commission by the Appearance Commission Chairperson:
1. Landscaping should be limited to native and non-invasive species. No invasive species should be permitted, especially considering the site’s proximity to the Cook County Forest Preserve. 2. Window glass should be minimally reflective and designed to deter birds.
Staff recommends incorporating the above comments into the following conditions of approval:
6 PC 20-08 – 6250 Dempster Street July 15, 2020
• Plant and tree species installed on the site shall be limited to native and non-invasive species, with a preference for native species. No invasive species shall be permitted. • Window glass shall be designed and installed in accordance with the Bird-Friendly Building Design manual published by the American Bird Conservancy (https://abcbirds.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Bird- Friendly-Building-Design_Updated-April-2019.pdf).
Standards for Special Uses Section 12-16-4:C.5 of the Unified Development Code establishes Standards for Special Uses, which are intended to be used for evaluating Special Use Permit requests.
Standards for Special Uses: The following standards for evaluating special uses shall be applied in a reasonable manner, taking into consideration the restrictions and/or limitations which exist for the site being considered for development:
a. Preservation of Health, Safety, Morals, And Welfare: The establishment, maintenance and operation of the special use will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or general welfare. b. Adjacent Properties: The special use should not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the uses permitted in the zoning district. c. Orderly Development: The establishment of the special use will not impede normal and orderly development or impede the utilization of surrounding property for uses permitted in the zoning district. d. Adequate Facilities: Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and other necessary facilities are in existence or are being provided. e. Traffic Control: Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress designed to minimize traffic congestion on the public streets. The proposed use of the subject site should not draw substantial amounts of traffic on local residential streets. f. Adequate Buffering: Adequate fencing and/or screening shall be provided to ensure the right of enjoyment of surrounding properties to provide for the public safety or to screen parking areas and other visually incompatible uses. g. Conformance to Other Regulations: The special use shall, in all other respects, conform to applicable provisions of this title or amendments thereto. Variation from provisions of this title as provided for in subsection 12-16-3A, "Variations", of this chapter, may be considered by the plan commission and the Village board of trustees as a part of the special use permit.
The Applicant should be prepared to discuss how they believe the proposed Special Use Permit and project meet the above standards at the public hearing.
Recommendation After review of the application, staff report, and as a result of the testimony, should the Plan Commission recommend approval of this application, staff suggests the following initial motion and conditions:
Motion to recommend approval of a Special Use Permit for a Recreation Facility to allow improvement of the Harrer aquatic facility, with a waiver to Section 12-2-2 for maximum number of accessory structures permitted on a zoning lot, for the property commonly known as 6250 Dempster Street in Morton Grove, Illinois (10-17-305-007-0000), subject to the following conditions:
1. Plant and tree species installed on the site shall be limited to native and non-invasive species, with a preference for native species. No invasive species shall be permitted.
7 PC 20-08 – 6250 Dempster Street July 15, 2020
2. Window glass shall be designed and installed in accordance with the Bird-Friendly Building Design manual published by the American Bird Conservancy (https://abcbirds.org/wp- content/uploads/2019/04/Bird-Friendly-Building-Design_Updated-April-2019.pdf). 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall submit a revised traffic and parking impact study for review and approval by the Land Use Planner and Village Engineer, and shall comply with all comments and recommendations provided by the Land Use Planner in the staff report to the Plan Commission dated July 15, 2020, and all comments and recommendations provided by the Village Engineer in the plan review comment form dated July 15, 2020. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall submit a final engineering plans in accordance with Village requirements and standards, for review and approval by the Village Engineer, and shall comply with all recommendations provided by the Village Engineer in the plan review comment form dated July 15, 2020. 5. The Applicant shall advise the Department of Community and Economic Development of any proposed change in ownership or operation of the commercial property. Such changes may subject the owners, lessees, occupants, and users to additional conditions and may serve as the basis for amendment to the Special Use Permit. 6. (Any additional conditions recommended by the Plan Commission)
8 REVIEWING: BUILDING FIRE POLICE PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING TSC
VILLAGE OF MORTON GROVE, ILLINOIS PLAN REVIEW COMMENT FORM
DATE DISTRIBUTED: 6/22/2020
CASE NUMBER: PC 20-08
APPLICATION: The Morton Grove Park District is requesting a Special Use Permit for a Recreation Facility to allow improvement of the Harrer Park Pool at the property commonly known as 6250 Dempster Street in Morton Grove, Illinois.
A Special Use Application has been submitted for Plan Commission action. Please return your review to the Department of Community Development by Wednesday, July 15, 2020. Thank you, Zoe Heidorn, Land Use Planner
COMMENTS OR CONCERNS
1. The Village and the Park District have an intergovernmental agreement to share parking spaces at the Village’s civic center and the Park District’s park facilities. Municipal Code Section 12-7-3:H. provides a procedure for shared parking spaces in off-street facilities. These shared facilities have worked satisfactorily for both agencies since 2001 and the agreement is expected to be renewed when it expires in 2021. The parking supply analysis included in the Traffic Study should follow this procedure. 2. A map identifying the various parking supply areas noted in Table 5 with various ownership (i.e.-Park District, Village, School District) and existing/proposed counts would be useful to clarify the narrative. 3. It would be useful for the Traffic Study to include the maximum number of people allowed in the existing and proposed facility. 4. Public Works’ staff believes the 18 additionally proposed parking spaces are feasible to install, but evidence of the feasibility has not been submitted with the application. At a minimum, the design plans will need to include dimensioned layout of the 18 parking spaces. 5. Traffic Study, 2019 Daily and Hourly Attendance: It appears that the data shown in Table 4 is from June 27, 2019 and not June 26, 2019 as indicated by footnote 1 based on the table 2019 Harrer Pool Visits by Day and Hour provided in the Appendix. The Traffic Study should be corrected or the information clarified. 6. Traffic Study, Parking Supply: Park View School is identified in Table 5 about parking supply. There is no reference to any shared parking with Park View School in the narrative. Any Parkview School parking supply should not be included in the parking supply count unless there is an existing or proposed agreement and then the shared parking spaces procedure should be used to determine the parking supply. 7. Disturbance area will require Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago Watershed Management Ordinance (MWRD WMO) permit for volume control, building sewer construction and erosion control. 8. Public pool will require Illinois Department of Public Health permit. 9. Storm Water Report is satisfactory for planned improvements, but the details of the site could not be verified. Storm water management of the site included in the design plans will need to meet village and MWRD WMO requirements.