DOCSLIB.ORG

Snake River Skies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Snake River Skies Snake River Skies A Publication of the Magic Valley Astronomical Society February 2009 Monthly Newsletter Mighty Orion: The Mythology resolved in good binoculars and small gazing is noticing and enjoying the telescopes as a bright gray-green various colors that stars display in The most brilliant of all the mist enveloping the star. In larger dark skies. These hues offer direct constellations dominates our evening telescopes it appears as a great glow- visual evidence of how stellar tem- sky this week, climbing well up in the ing irregular cloud. A sort of auroral peratures vary. south around 9 p.m. local time. It is, glow is induced in this nebula by fluo- of course, Orion, the Hunter. But just rescence from the strong ultraviolet In Orion, ruddy Betelgeuse exactly who was he? radiation of four hot stars entangled and bluish Rigel provide an excellent within it. Edward Emerson Barnard color contrast but we can easily find (1857-1923), for many years an as- other colors as well. Look at orangish As is also the case with the tronomer at Yerkes Observatory, mighty Hercules, the figure of Orion Aldebaran and yellowish Pollux. And once remarked that it reminded him of considerably removed from the winter has been associated in virtually all- a great ghostly bat and that he always ancient cultures with great national groupings, is brilliant topaz Arcturus, experienced a feeling of surprise usually regarded as a spring star, but heroes, warriors, or demigods. Yet, in when he saw it. contrast to Hercules, who was cred- now, in the dead of midwinter, rises ited with a detailed series of exploits, this week between 10:30 and 11 p.m. Orion seems to us a vague and shad- The Great Orion Nebula is a and quickly holds forth in solitary owy figure. The ancient mythological vast cloud of extremely tenuous glow- splendor in the east-northeast. stories of Orion are so many and so confused that it is almost impossible Even as you observe these to choose among all of them. Even stellar colors, do you notice that the origin of the name Orion is ob- they're recognizable only for the scure, though some scholars have brightest stars? This is due to the suggested a connection with the physiology of the eye, more specifi- Greek "Arion," meaning simply war- cally, the fact that the color sensors rior. All, however, agree that he was on the retina – the cones – are insen- the mightiest hunter in the world and sitive to faint light. Under dim illumi- he is always pictured in the stars with nation the retinal rods take over. But his club upraised in his right hand. their greater light sensitivity is offset by their color blindness. This is why Hanging from his upraised left we see all faint stars as white How- hand is the skin of a great lion he has ever, if we look at them through bin- killed and which he is brandishing in oculars or a telescope, their amplified the face of Taurus, the Bull, who is brightness stimulates the cones, which can detect their color. charging down upon him. ing gas and dust, approximately 1,600 light-years away and about 30 light Joe Rao serves as an instructor and Where stars are born years across (or more than 20,000 guest lecturer at New York's Hayden times the diameter of the entire solar Planetarium. He writes about astron- system). Astrophysicists now believe Below Orion's famous three- omy for The New York Times and that this nebulous stuff is a stellar in- star belt is undoubtedly one of the other publications, and he is also an cubator; the primeval chaos from most wonderfully beautiful objects in on-camera meteorologist for News 12 which star formation is presently un- the sky: the Great Orion Nebula. It Westchester, New York. © 1/30/2009 appears to surround the middle star of derway. by Joe Rao and Imaginova Corp., All a fainter trio of stars in a line that rights reserved. marks the hunter's sword. The nebula In living color is invisible to the unaided eye, though the star itself appears a bit fuzzy. It is One of the pleasures of star- PAGE 2 MVAS MONTHLY NEWSLETTER FEBRUARY 2009 A Preacher's Thought’s Editor’s Note on this article: As we of troublesome facts if the parties in- tronomy, the physical life we live is celebrate the 400th Anniversary of volved do not share a common regard the result of science – from the clothes Galileo Galilei, who looked to the to different sources of knowledge. we wear, the food we eat, the homes “Heavens;” we should be reminded Setting aside for the moment the is- in which we live, the cities that we that “Faith” is a personal matter. sue of faith, there are two sources of build, the cars that we drive, the com- Galileo literally was accused of heresy knowledge – Science and History, and puter this article is typed on – all by the Catholic Church. As many of the process of obtaining knowledge these exist because of science. you may be aware, the Vatican has its through these disciplines is as differ- own observatory: “The Vatican Ob- ent as night and day. The historical method re- servatory,” which is one of the oldest quires the gathering of sources and astronomical research institutions Webster's gives the definition developing a confidence in the accu- of science as “1. A branch of knowl- racy of those sources. Unlike the sci- in the world. Read this article from edge or study dealing with a body of entific method, which should yield society member Pastor Jim Tubbs as facts or truths systematically ar- results that can be repeated and veri- he relates his own personal reflec- ranged and showing the operation of fied by others, historical sources are tions on the cosmos. There is no in- general laws 2. Systematic knowledge often spotty, not providing the level tent for any argument only a view of the physical or material world.” of detail our western scientific mind point to be shared. Likewise, history is defined as “1. craves. Multiple conflicting sources The branch of knowledge dealing with must be weighed, with judgments Many months ago, I was past events.....4. The record of past made concerning their value. Even asked by one of our society members events, especially in connection with with sources that are regarded as “How does a preacher even get inter- the human race.” having a high degree of accuracy, we ested in astronomy?” It was an hon- find ourselves wanting greater exact- est question of genuine curiosity, but ness. As an example, in studying the I did not give an answer at the time. history of ancient Egypt, I was struck Frankly I was a bit stunned. How by the varying dates given the dynas- could a preacher not be interested in ties and events of Egypt. In many astronomy? A line in one of ancient cases, all we have are names...nothing Israel's hymns of praise says “The else. To make matters worse, the heavens declare the glory of God, and Egyptians tended to memorialize only the sky proclaims the work of His those things which tended to elevate hands.” Since that question, I have them. Trying to fit in other current been thinking how I would answer. I events of the surrounding nations is spoke with V.P. David Olsen and told difficult because of all the gaps. The him I thought it would be fun to write modern mind is not comfortable with an article for our newsletter that The acquisition of knowledge these deficiencies. However, this is would answer that question without is its method. The scientific method the nature of knowledge for most of being preachy (hopefully). The arti- is “a method of research in which a mankind's existence, and therefore cle was supposed to be ready for the problem is identified, relevant data cannot be ignored. One might wonder December newsletter, but due to a are gathered, a hypothesis is formu- why we even need to concern our- busy month, I was unable to get it lated from this data, and the hypothe- selves with historical knowledge, ready (read this as, I put it on the sis is empirically tested” (again, Web- given its deficiencies. Scientific back burner and then forgot about it). ster’s). This is the method of choice in knowledge can tell us much about And that was just as well, for that our modern age. By this our knowl- what we are, but it takes historical gave me time to reconsider my origi- edge of this physical world and the knowledge to inform us who and why nal plan. universe has advanced impressively. we are. Among other benefits, his- As recent as my birth (1956), it was What I propose to do is set torical knowledge provides the frame- believed our galaxy was the sum total forth the very basic assumptions work of wisdom to guide our steps in of the universe. Our ability to meas- which lead any person to particular a scientific world where virtually any- ure distance is constantly being re- conclusions. Our views of this world thing is possible. fined. Using creative techniques and are determined by what we consider new types of telescopes we are able to There is one other term which to be valid sources of knowledge. It see objects behind other objects. And must be defined, if for no other reason is of no value to argue pros and cons just this past year we have obtained than that it is often misused.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Galileo and the Telescope
    Galileo and the Telescope A Discussion of Galileo Galilei and the Beginning of Modern Observational Astronomy ___________________________ Billy Teets, Ph.D. Acting Director and Outreach Astronomer, Vanderbilt University Dyer Observatory Tuesday, October 20, 2020 Image Credit: Giuseppe Bertini General Outline • Telescopes/Galileo’s Telescopes • Observations of the Moon • Observations of Jupiter • Observations of Other Planets • The Milky Way • Sunspots Brief History of the Telescope – Hans Lippershey • Dutch Spectacle Maker • Invention credited to Hans Lippershey (c. 1608 - refracting telescope) • Late 1608 – Dutch gov’t: “ a device by means of which all things at a very great distance can be seen as if they were nearby” • Is said he observed two children playing with lenses • Patent not awarded Image Source: Wikipedia Galileo and the Telescope • Created his own – 3x magnification. • Similar to what was peddled in Europe. • Learned magnification depended on the ratio of lens focal lengths. • Had to learn to grind his own lenses. Image Source: Britannica.com Image Source: Wikipedia Refracting Telescopes Bend Light Refracting Telescopes Chromatic Aberration Chromatic aberration limits ability to distinguish details Dealing with Chromatic Aberration - Stop Down Aperture Galileo used cardboard rings to limit aperture – Results were dimmer views but less chromatic aberration Galileo and the Telescope • Created his own (3x, 8-9x, 20x, etc.) • Noted by many for its military advantages August 1609 Galileo and the Telescope • First observed the
    [Show full text]
  • E F L E C T I O N S a Man Not Known to Sleep E
    s u m m e r . q u a r t e r / j u n e . 2 0 1 4 r e f l e c t i o n s a man not known to sleep E. E. Barnard on Mount Wilson According to Allan Sandage, Edward Emerson Barnard was “the last of the great visual observers and the first of the long line of photo- graphic atlas makers with wide-angle telescopes.” William Sheehan, Barnard’s biographer, wrote that he deserves special recognition as “one of the most versatile astronomers of the 19th century, perhaps the last to master the entire field of observational astronomy, and a marvelous visual and photographic observer as well.” Yet Barnard is little known today outside of astronomical circles. Barnard worked on Mount Wilson for about 8 months in 1905. He at mount wilson observatory in 1905 From left: H. L. Miller, Charles G. Abbot, George Ellery Hale, Leonard Ingersoll, Ferdinand Ellerman, was on leave from Yerkes Observatory, along with a Yerkes telescope. Walter S. Adams, Edward Emerson Barnard, Charles Backus. Only Hale, This brief period yielded 40 of the 50 fields of Barnard’s magnificent Adams, Ellerman, and Backus were permanent staff members. star atlas — An Atlas of Selected Regions of the Milky Way — published in 1927. The Milky Way atlas represents the first use of a photographic observations of the night sky and became fascinated with comets, telescope, an unusual instrument sponsored by (and named after) which he began hunting on a methodical basis. Finding that a patron Catherine Wolfe Bruce.
    [Show full text]
  • E. E. Barnard and His Dark Nebula!
    Visible throughout our galaxy are clouds of interstellar matter, thin but widespread wisps of gas and dust. Some of the stars near nebulae are often very massive and their high-energy radiation can excite the gas of the nebula to shine; such nebula is called emission nebula. If the stars are dimmer or further away, their light is reflected by the dust in the nebula and can be seen as reflection nebula. Some nebulae are only visible by the absorption of the light from objects behind them. These are called dark nebula Edward Emerson Barnard was a professor of astronomy at the University of Chicago Yerkes Observatory. As a pioneer in astrophotography, he cataloged a series of dark nebula of the Milky Way. Through this work of studying the structure of the Milky Way, Barnard discovered that certain dark regions of our galaxy are actually clouds of gas and dust that obscured the more distant stars in the background. Today, we’re going to look-back on his life and accomplishments. We’ll also review several of my observations of his dark nebula. Barnard’s Early Years: A: Childhood, Work, and Stargazing Edward Emerson Barnard was born on December 16th, 1857 in Nashville Tennessee, at the cusp of the Civil War. His mother, Elizabeth, (at the age of 42), had moved the family from Cincinnati to Nashville a few months prior to Edward’s birth, when his father, Reuben Barnard had passed away. The family lived in near poverty, with Elizabeth as the sole provider working several small jobs, the most profitable being that of her making wax flowers, which she had a skill at creating.
    [Show full text]
  • 'This Is Not a Pipe': Curious Dark Nebula Seen As Never Before 15 August 2012
    'This is not a pipe': Curious dark nebula seen as never before 15 August 2012 were areas in space where there were no stars. But it was later discovered that dark nebulae actually consist of clouds of interstellar dust so thick it can block out the light from the stars beyond. The Pipe Nebula appears silhouetted against the rich star clouds close to the centre of the Milky Way in the constellation of Ophiuchus (The Serpent Bearer). Barnard 59 forms the mouthpiece of the Pipe Nebula and is the subject of this new image from the Wide Field Imager on the MPG/ESO 2.2-metre telescope. This strange and complex dark nebula lies about 600-700 light-years away from Earth. The nebula is named after the American astronomer Edward Emerson Barnard who was the first to systematically record dark nebulae using long-exposure photography and one of those who recognised their dusty nature. Barnard catalogued a total of 370 dark nebulae all over the sky. A self- This picture shows Barnard 59, part of a vast dark cloud made man, he bought his first house with the prize of interstellar dust called the Pipe Nebula. This new and money from discovering several comets. Barnard very detailed image of what is known as a dark nebula was an extraordinary observer with exceptional was captured by the Wide Field Imager on the eyesight who made contributions in many fields of MPG/ESO 2.2-meter telescope at ESO's La Silla astronomy in the late 19th and early 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Josef Petzval (1807-1891) and the Early Development of Astrophotography
    Josef Petzval (1807-1891) and the early development of astrophotography GUDRUN WOLFSCHMIDT ½ ½ Institute for the History of Science, Hamburg University, Bundesstr. 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany ([email protected]) In 1839, the invention of photography was made public. Immediately astronomical applications were attempted. First “daguerreotypes” of Moon, Sun, and bright fixed stars were made. The first fifty years of photography are characterized by the search for suitable methods of obtaining the most stable and lifelike image. The first successful attempt to develop and fix a photographic image – on a silver-coated copper plate (daguerreotypye) – was in 1839. In 1840, Josef Petzval (1807–1891), professor of mathematics at Vienna University, developed a portrait objective, a dublet system. Compared to Daguerre’s lens, this “Petzval objective” was 22 times faster, had a larger field of view and had less aberrations. The optician Peter Wilhelm Friedrich Voigtländer (1812–1878) used it in 1841 for the first metallic camera. Also in 1839, another process was announced which allowed prints to be made from paper negatives (calotype). From 1851 a new method gained acceptance in which a glass plate was coated with a light-sensitive layer imme- diately before exposure (collodion wet plate process). This reduced the required exposure time to a few seconds. The new medium quickly became established in many areas of application, including especially portrait pho- tography. But until the invention of the gelatine dry plate process (1871), photography remained a complicated business which could only be carried out by specialists. In the 1880s this “dry plate” allowed much shorter exposure times, hence photography became widely known.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Presentations: [email protected]
    Larry McHenry: List of presentations: [email protected] The following are suitable for starparty/conventions: (~35 to 50 minutes in length) "The Local Group of Galaxies (What are they, and How to Observe Them)". Today, we’ll discuss what I’ve learned during my observing 'journey' among the Local Group. We'll review what are galaxies in general and what is the Local Group and its place in the universe, along with some of the people, both historical and modern, behind these objects, and how to go about observing them. "Planetary Nebula: From Messier to Abell (What are they, and How to Observe Them)" Planetary Nebula,,,,,, Colorful ephemeral ghosts, luminescent wispy shells of dying stars. Little crystal ball gems in the night sky, delighting amateur astronomers using small or large telescopes.,,, So today, I would like to bring these ethereal objects ‘down to Earth’ by discussing what they are, why we call them that, some of the people, both historical and modern, behind these objects, and how to go about observing them. "Halton Arp and his Peculiar Galaxies" In 1966 American astrophysicist Halton Arp published a paper titled "Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies", which list 338 ‘interesting’ photographs of galaxies that didn’t fit into the normal Hubble classification scheme. Through his work of studying these types of unusual galaxies, Arp broke new ground in our understanding the universe, and along the way sparked a debate that challenged the basics of the Big Band Theory. Today, we’re going to look-back on his life and accomplishments, talk a little bit about the redshift controversy, and his Atlas.
    [Show full text]
  • Barnard Decided to Erect the Bruce Telescope on a Small Hillock on the Trail Midway Between the Monastery and the Observatory Shop
    340 DISAPPOINTMENTS AND TRIUMPHS Occasionally the Smithsonian challenged all comers to a game of duplicate whist, but more often the group would gather around the fireplace for discussions of plans of work or of the state of the world in general. Hale's amazing breadth of interests, his great personal charm, and his stories of important figures in science and national and international affairs make these evenings stand out in memory.53 Barnard decided to erect the Bruce telescope on a small hillock on the trail midway between the Monastery and the observatory shop. By the end of his first month on Mt. Wilson, he had mounted together on the cement pier on this site four telescopes -the 10-inch and 6¼ " photographic telescopes, and a 3½" doublet and a lantern lens. Barnard made his first exposures on the night of January 27, and over the next seven months set himself a feverish pace of work. For many years he had been used to getting along with less than four hours of sleep a night. On Mt. Wilson he often gave up sleep altogether. As Adams later recalled: Barnard's hours of work would have horrified any medical man. Sleep he considered a sheer waste of time, and for long intervals would forget it altogether. After observing until midnight, he would drink a large quantity of coffee, work the remainder of the night, develop his photographs, and then join the solar observers at breakfast. The morning he would spend in washing his plates, which was done by successive changes of water, since running water was not yet available.
    [Show full text]
  • Newton's Great… Oversight
    NEWTON’S GREAT… OVERSIGHT Michael Hugh Knowles 1 of 152 Newton’s Great… Oversight [This page intentionally left blank.] 2 of 152 [email protected] NEWTON’S GREAT… OVERSIGHT Galileo’s Falling Bodies, Newton’s Theory of Gravity, and Lagrange’s Trojan Points and Trojan Asteroids with Their Tadpole and Horseshoe Orbits Michael Hugh Knowles November 7, 2011 3 of 152 Newton’s Great… Oversight Copyright © 1995–2011, Michael Hugh Knowles. All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. Cover image: Contour plot of a simple function of the falling rate difference of lighter and heavier bodies (a static, 2-dimensional case). One can see regions relating to the stabilities and instabilities associated with Lagrangian points L1-5. The plot suggests that there might be more to the Lagrangian point story than Lagrange discovered, even more than we currently think. (Plotted with MathCAD 2000.) The basic material for this book—“Newton’s Great… Oversight” (NGO)—was first posted on the Internet in 1995. It has been subsequently revised a number of times, with the contour plots finally added in 2000. Since then the technical content has had no major revisions and only a few minor revisions updating Trojan asteroid info. But the overall presentation has been revamped several times; and the philosophical analyses and other maunderings have been extended and reworked a number of times. This (pre-publication, informal peer review version) ebook is intended for and dedicated to “stoutly gifted children of any age” who will see it as a challenging opportunity for the future evolution of science: “Science, right or wrong; when right, to be kept right; when wrong, to be put right.” FAIR WARNING: this ebook contains much that some people will find provocative, controversial, polemical, even obstreperous, one way and/or another, e.g.: “… Science is still evolving in the direction of ‘Religious’ intolerance… … Science is greatly in need of ‘to be put right’…” FEEDBACK: I am hoping very much for high-quality informal peer review FEEDBACK.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Emerson Barnard by Florence M. Kelleher
    Edward Emerson Barnard by Florence M. Kelleher Edward Emerson Barnard was born in Nashville, Tennessee, on December 16, 1857 to a life of poverty and hardship. His father died before he was born. He spent only two months of his early life in school, receiving all of his education from his mother. Forced to help support her, Barnard took a job in a photog- raphy gallery when he was nine. In charge of the solar enlarger, a device that tracked the sun to make photographic prints, he became an expert in the techniques of photography. Barnard's first telescope, a simple lens in a cardboard tube, was made for him by one of his coworkers from the small objective of a broken spyglass found in the street. With it he began observing the stars, but was unable to identify any of them. In exchange for a favor, a friend gave him a copy of Thomas Dick's book, the Practical Astronomer, in 1876. Finding a star map in the book, Barnard was able to learn the conventional names of the objects with which he was already so familiar. From these humble beginnings, he went on to become the greatest astronomical observer of his time. In 1876, Barnard purchased a 5-inch refracting telescope for $380, two-thirds his annual earnings, and read extensively on astronomy. When a scientific meeting was held in Nashville in 1887, Barnard met Simon Newcomb, the dean of American astronomers. Newcomb, an expert in celestial mechanics, ad- vised the eager young man to improve his mathematical skills and search for comets.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Emerson Barnard – Nashville Astronomer Extraordinaire
    Edward Emerson Barnard – Nashville Astronomer Extraordinaire A Brief Look at the Life and Accomplishments of One of Nashville’s Own Dr. Billy Teets Vanderbilt University Dyer Observatory Osher Lifelong Learning Institute Friday, November 13, 2020 The Immortal Fire Within William Sheehan Barnard – The Beginning • Born December 16, 1857 - Nashville, TN • Born into an impoverished family • Son of Reuben and Elizabeth Barnard • Father died before his birth • Mother had constant health issues, both mentally and physically • Only one sibling – brother Charles • Despite free public school, Edward only attended two months Astronomy Began Early for Barnard Witnessed a comet when very young – likely Great Comet of 1861. The stars “often helped soothe the sadness of childhood.” John H. Van Stavoren & the Jupiter Camera • Elizabeth Barnard gets Edward a job a Van Stavoren Portait Studio (now where Union Street and Fourth Avenue are located). • Would run errands and guide the Jupiter camera. John H. Van Stavoren & the Jupiter Camera • Young boys were often hired to track the Jupiter camera. • Elizabeth Barnard insisted that her son would not fall asleep. • Took great pride in any job and having it done well. • Barnard made observations of Sun’s motion with the camera – discovered the equation of time on his own. The Equation of Time & Analemma • Due to inclination of Earth’s rotational axis and elliptical orbit around the Sun. • Causes sundials to run fast or slow. Image Credit: Anthony Ayiomamitis (TWAN) His Companion Star • Would walk home two miles every night from the studio • Noticed a yellowish star that would accompany him. • Noted that it wandered over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep-Sky Companions: the Messier Objects,Second Edition
    Deep-Sky Companions Stephen James O’Meara Proof stage “Do not Distribute” DEEP-SKY COMPANIONS The Messier Objects, Second Edition The bright galaxies, star clusters, and nebulae cata- engaging and informative writing style and for his logued in the late 1700s by the famous comet hunter remarkable skills as a visual observer. O’Meara Charles Messier are still the most widely observed spent much of his early career on the editorial staff celestial wonders in the sky. The second edition of of Sky & Telescope before joining Astronomy mag- Stephen James O’Meara’s acclaimed observing guide azine as its Secret Sky columnist and a contribut- to the Messier objects features improved star charts ing editor. An award-winning visual observer, he for helping you find the objects, a much more robust was the first person to sight Halley’s comet upon telling of the history behind their discovery – includ- its return in 1985 and the first to determine visu- ing a glimpse into Messier’s fascinating life – and ally the rotation period of Uranus. One of his most updated astrophysical facts to put it all into con- distinguished feats was the visual detection of text. These additions, along with new photos taken the mysterious spokes in Saturn’s B-ring before with the most advanced amateur telescopes, bring spacecraft imaged them. Among his achieve- O’Meara’s first edition more than a decade into the ments, O’Meara has received the prestigious Lone twenty-first century. Expand your universe and test Stargazer Award, the Omega Centauri Award, and your viewing skills with this truly modern Messier the Caroline Herschel Award.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Astrophotography Timeline
    History of Astrophotography Timeline Pedro Ré http://www.astrosurf.com/re 1800- Thomas Wedgwood (1771-1805) produces "sun pictures" by placing opaque objects on leather treated with silver nitrate; resulting images deteriorated rapidly. 1816- Joseph Nicéphore Niépce (1765-1833) combines the camera obscura with photosensitive paper. 1826- Joseph Niépce produces the first permanent image (Heliograph) using a camera obscura and white bitumen (Figure 1). 1829- Niépce and Louis Daguerre (1787-1851) sign a ten year agreement to work in partnership developing their new recording medium. 1834- Henry Fox Talbot (1800-1877) creates permanent (negative) images using paper soaked in silver chloride and fixed with a salt solution. Talbot created positive images by contact printing onto another sheet of paper. Talbot’s The Pencil of Nature, published in six installments between 1844 and 1846 was the first book to be illustrated entirely with photographs. 1837- Louis Daguerre creates images on silver-plated copper, coated with silver iodide and "developed" with warmed mercury (daguerreotype). 1839- Louis Daguerre patents the daguerreotype. The daguerreotype process is released for general use in return for annual state pensions given to Daguerre and Isidore Niépce (Louis Daguerre’s son): 6000 and 4000 francs respectively. 1939- John Frederick William Herschel (1792-1871) uses for the first time the term Photography (meaning writing with light). 1939- First unsuccessful daguerreotype of the moon obtained by Daguerre (blurred image – long exposure). 1839- François Jean Dominique Arago (1786-1853) announces the daguerreotype process at the French Academy of Sciences (January, 7 and August, 19). Arago predicts the future use of the photographic technique in the fields of selenography, photometry and spectroscopy.
    [Show full text]