Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation and Drainage District Pumping

Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation and Drainage District

Pumping Efficiency Project - Infrastructure Modernization and SCADA Upgrades

Pinal AMA Cover Page

1 2 Project Map

3 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 MSIDD 2019 WELL ACRE FEET PUMPED

Legend 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12

Ú[ Pumps

Hwy 347 Hwy

Green Rd Green

Porter Rd Porter

Fuqua Rd Fuqua

White Rd White

Ralston Rd Ralston

Amarillo Valley Rd Valley Amarillo

Murphy Rd Murphy

Warren Rd Warren

Smith Rd Smith Rd Parker & White

Table Top Rd Top Table &1

Hartman Rd MSIDD_Gates

Anderson Rd Anderson

Russell Rd Russell

Sage St Sage Hidden Valley Rd Valley Hidden Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[

18 17 16 15 14 Lateral13 Canal 18 17 Ú[ 13 Ú[ 18 18 17 16 15 Ú[ 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 17 16 15 14 13 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ E13-7#4 Main Canal Smith Enke Rd Ú[ Ú[ Smith Enke Rd Ú[WR-7#1 200 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ 320 Ú[ WR-7#2 Ú[ E13-7#3 733 1132 Ak-Chin Boundary

- TURNOUT FOR MACE METER WR-6#1 Ú[ 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 19 Ú[ Ú[ WR-6#2 24 Ú[ 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 Ú[ 19 20 21 22 23 24 78 1102 Ú[E13-8#4 SP - SPILLWAY MONITORING POINT Ú[ 50 McDavid Rd Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Honeycutt Rd Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ - WELLSITES FOR MAG METERING Ú[ Ú[ Ú[

Ú[ 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 30 Ú[ E10-14#1 Ú[ 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 Ú[ 26 25 30 Ú[ 29 28 27 26 25 253 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Bowlin Rd Ú[ 0 0.5 1 2 Miles Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Bowlin Rd Ú[ Ú[ Ú[E13-3#1 754 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[

31 Ú[ E12-3#3 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ [ Ú[ 32 33 34 35 Ú[ 36 31 32 33Ú[ 34 Ú 35 36 31 32 Ú[ 33 166 Ú[ 34 35 36 Ú[ Farrell Rd Ú[ Farrell Rd Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ E10-8#2 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ E12-3#2 499 Ú[ 994 Ú[

Ú[ 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 6 5 4 3 Ú[ 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 Ú[3 2 Ú[ 1 Ú[ Ú[ E11-1#2 Ú[ Steen Rd E10-6#1 1147 WRA-1#1 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Steen Rd Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ 147 Ú[ Ú[ 1015 Ú[

Ú[ WR-1#3 Ú[ 1005 Ú[ WR-1#2 7 8 9 10 11 Ú[ 12 8 9 10 11 EMC-8#5 7 Ú[ Ú[ 12E10-5#5 8 Ú[ 697 Ú[ 7 E10A-1#19 1441 Ú[10 11 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 308 Ú[ 12 Ú[ Ú[ 643 Ú[ Ú[ E10-5#1 Peters & Nall Rd SP Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ 2198 E10-4#3 Ú[ EMC-8#4 Ú[ Ú[ E10-2#1 Ú[ Ú[ 934 1320 1013 Ú[

Ú[ 18 17 16 15 SP14 13 Ú[ WM-9P#3 18 17 16 15 14 555 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17

Bianco Rd Bianco Papago Rd Ú[ Rd Corrales WM-9P#2 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Rd Midway Ú[ 512 SP Rd Valley Indian Rd Montgomery Trading Post Rd

19 20 21 22 23 24 Ú[WMB-1#2 21 22 23 20 24 Ú[ 19 667 19 20 21 22 23 WLB-1#2 24 Ú[ WM-7P#2 Ú[ Val Vista Rd 308 550 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 WO-1#5 WLB-1#1 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ 1109 N/A Ú[ Val Vista Rd Ú[WL-4#4 Ú[ Ú[ 602 30 29 28 27 Ú[ Ú[ WO-1#4 26 25 28 27 26 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ 25 193 30 Ú[ 29 30 29 28 27 Ú[ 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 Teel Rd Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ WH-12#1 Ú[WN-3#4 WM-6#2 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ E9-6#1 Ú[ SP Ú[ 297 1380 Ú[ 286 WH-7#4 E7-6#5 16 Ú[ Ú[ E9A-1#1Ú[ Ú[ E9B-1#3 Teel Rd 369 15 Ú[ 1674 819 31 32 33 34 35 36Ú[ Ú[ 34 35 Ú[ 31 32 33 36 31 32 33 E9B-1#2 E9B-1#134 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ 35 36 Ú[ 1200 244 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 Miller Rd Ú[ Ú[ EMC-5P#2 SP Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ E9-5#3 Ú[ 1365 Ú[ E9-1#2Ú[Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ 487 Ú[ Ú[ E9-3#2Ú[ E9-3#1 Miller Rd WNB-1#1 885 22 1164 1635 6 5 4 3 2 Ú[ E7-6#4 1 Ú[ Ú[ 20 Ú[ E7A-1#2 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 Ú[ 5 4 3 2 Ú[ Ú[ E7-6#3Ú[ 358 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 Ú[ 206 Barnes Rd Ú[ Ú[ Ú[

WM-4#1 WMA-1#1 WMA-1#2 E7-5#2 Ú[ E7-1#3 Barnes Rd Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ 1503 1035 1395 245 878 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ú[ SRC-10#3 Ú[ WM-3#1 WL-2#2 Ú[ Ú[ E7-1#2 557 Ú[ 1123 Ú[ 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 7 1963 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 1117 10 11 Meadow Green Rd Ú[ WM-1#3 E7-4#1 Ú[ 2109 N/A WH-8#2 WG-5#4 Ú[ WK-2#1 Ú[ WH-8#1 WG-6#2 Ú[ WM-1#2 WL-1#2 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ WI-2#8 749 Ú[ Ú[Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ E7-2#1 Ú[ E7-1#1 Ú[ Ú[ 542 473 232 Kortsen Rd 1599 1788 734 905 575 1515 Ú[ Ú[ 18 17 16 15 14 13 WI-2#6 599 WG-5#2 Ú[ [ [ Ú[ Ú[ WG-5#1 WG-4#3 18 WL-1#117 16 Ú 15Ú[ Ú 14 13 594 Ú[18 17 16 Ú[ 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 Ú[ 1125 474 601 Ú[ WI-2#5 Century Rd SRC-8A#3 Ú[ 731 1476 WG-4#2 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[Ú[Ú[ Ú[Ú[ WK-1#1 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ WI-2#3 898 Ú[ WG-4#1 E6-1#1 864 Ú[ Clayton Rd SRC-8A#4 489 113 2371 19 20 21 22 23 24 733 WG-2#4 Ú[ WG-3P#2 E5-5#3 E5-5#1 Ú[ Ú[WH-7#3 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ E5-2#2 19 20 21 22 23 24 747 19 644 20 583 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 Ú[ 1472 834 1359 Dune Shadow Rd WH-7#1 WG-2#2 WG-2#1 Ú[ E5-1#1 Ú[ 1280 1020 Ú[ 730 Ú[ WG-3P#1 Ú[E5-3#1 Ú[ 1023 WH-7#2 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ 761 728 Hwy 84 1284 30 29 28 27 26 25

30 29 28 27 Ú[WH-4#4 26Ú[WH-4#3 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 Fresno Rd 858 981 WJ-1#1 WJ-1#2 E4-4#2 E4-4#1 1059 WI-1#3 WH-4#2 WGA-3#3 WGA-3#1 Ú[ E4-3#2 E4-2#1 E4-1#1 Ú[ Ú[ 1328 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ 757 844 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ 1026 793 WH-5#1 WH-5#2 639 686 1390 648 642Ú[ Peters Rd 453 31 32 847 WC-4#5 33 34 35 36 Ú[SRC-7P#2 Ú[ 1805 103 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[WI-1#2 WH-4#1 Ú[ WD-7#4 Ú[ WC-4#4 31 32 33 34 35 Ú[ 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 Ú[31 Ú[ 32 33 34 35 36 31 Ú[ 1396 10 464 80 Robin Rd Ú[WGA-2#2 WH-2#1 1002 1468 EMC-2#1 Ú[ Ú[ WH-3#1 WG-1#3 EMC-2#4 EMC-2#2 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ 1152 1460 WGA-2#3 1035 448 258 Selma Hwy WGA-2#1 690 6 5 4 3 2 1 WG-1#2 6 Ú[ 881 EMC-2#3 WH-1#1 122 E3A-1#1 Ú[ 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 WGA-1#14 3 2 547 Ú[ 1 Ú[ 1057 Ú[ 1744 594 WG-1#1 Ú[ 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 Ú[ WD-7#1 E3A-2#1 E3A-1#2 965 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Carranza Rd 1017 546 1170 Cornman Rd Ú[ 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 EMC-1P#3 Ú[ WD-6#2Ú[ Ú[ 488 Ú[ 550 Ú[ EMC-1P#27 8 9 10 11 12 7 338 Beggs Rd Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ WE-1#2 EMC-1P#1 Ú[ 1561 573 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ WE-1#1 Hanna Rd SRC-6P#2 Ú[ 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 Ú[ 17 16 15 14 13 18 17Ú[ 549 16 15 884 14 13

E2-1#2 Ú[ 18 Ú[ 17 16 15 14 13 18 527 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[WD-5#1 Connelley Rd 1084 WC-2#2 Ú[E2-2#2 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[E2-1#1 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ N/A 478 1021 Ú[WD-4#2 Arica Rd 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 1011 24 SRC-2#2 Ú[ 390 WC-1#1 Ú[ 23 24 19SRC-2#1 669 20 21 22 19 Ú[ WD-4#1 Ú[ Marsh Rd 1037 256 Ú[ SRC-3P#2 421 SP 30 29 28 27 26 Ú[ 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 FLOW MONITORING Shedd Rd

30 29 28 27 26 25 30 SRC-4#2 Ú[ Ú[ Ú[ Joaquin Rd 924

31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 Houser Rd

31 32 33 34 35 36 31

6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 Battaglia Rd 5 4 3 2 1 6

Sage Rd Sage

White Rd

Amarillo Valley Rd Amarillo Valley

Hidden Valley Rd Hidden Valley

Green Rd Green

Hwy347

SmithRd

Warren Rd Warren

Ralston Ralston Rd

· RdPorter

White & Parker Rd White Parker &

Fuqua Rd

Murphy Murphy Rd

7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 Rd Press 7 8 9 10 11 12

Russell Rd Russell

Stanfield Rd Corrales Rd Corrales

Anderson RdAnderson

Midway Rd Midway

Montgomery Rd 4 Bianco Rd 7 Executive Summary

5 The Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation and Drainage District (MSIDD, District) is a political subdivision and municipal corporation of the State. The overall system consists of 75 miles of main canal, 200 miles of laterals and about 20 miles of pipelines. The groundwater system consists of 160 ADWR registered wells. A SCADA control system was implemented on the Main Stem Canals and there is no off-line storage to help regulate mismatched flows, emergencies, or rain events, therefore operational challenges are managed within the canal. The canal delivery system is about 33 years old, and original SCADA elements are about 28 years old.

Irrigation and agronomic cultural practices evolve to meet resource limitations and challenges to remain economically viable. This includes conversion of irrigation systems from gravity flood irrigation to micro-sprinklers, center pivot, linear move systems, or drip irrigation. These modern methods tend to use more advanced inputs and operate efficiently when water supply is accurate, onand demand shut needed.off when New irrigation technologies in surface irrigation have similar operational requirements. These irrigation systems create complex operational challenges and flow mismatches. If these flows cannot be redistributed to other delivery points, they are carried downstream and spilled.

The subject MSIDD modernization project is in response to the aging and deficient flow measurement equipment, infrastructure and associated SCADA that are needed to modernize and better operate the large network of canals, pipelines, and well pumps efficiently. In addition, support requested is in Phase I and part of a larger multi-phased Modernization Project to help the District, and the end users be good stewards of natural resources, including groundwater in an effort to support long term sustainability. Into response regional drought, and help support the mitigation of future risk of shortage, impacts to operations by changing irrigation systems to precision application systems, increased reduction in future surface water supplies, and an increased dependence on groundwater in the future it is critical to move forward with a system modernization that will optimize overall water use, especially groundwater. Again, the project is planned to be Phased and this funding request is associated with Phase I involving SCADA upgrades and improved flow measurement. Subsequent Phases of modernization will include a system optimization study, installation of pipelines and integration of wells, regulation storage, SCADA, on-farm pump backs, introduction of new technologies, as well as training.

Stakeholders and financial partners include the Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage, Ak-Chin Indian Community, and the US Bureau of Reclamation. Further, the entire project area is within the Pinal AMA and in keeping with the goals of the AMA. The District economy is primarily agricultural and the modernization project will help preserve this economy for as long as feasible, and preserve groundwater resources for future use. The overall project emphasizes water innovation and technologies to improve canal operations and irrigation efficiencies. It also has an educational component to educate end uses on tools available to better manage on-farm irrigation all of which may contribute to long term sustainability by reducing groundwater pumping. 6 Project Overview

7 PROJECT OVERVIEW:

Pumping Efficiency Project – Infrastructure Modernization and SCADA Upgrades

A) The Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation and Drainage District (MSIDD, District) is a political subdivision and municipal corporation of the State which was formed in 1962 for the purposes of providing a supply of irrigation water for agricultural use by means of constructing and operating irrigation works.

The District is entirely within the boundaries of Pinal County which is located in the south- central portion of Arizona. The county encompasses about 5,370 square miles and has two distinct regions; a mountainous eastern region where copper mining is established, and a western region (where the district is located) consisting of desert valleys, irrigated agricultural lands, and some mining activity. The leading industries in the County are farming, ranching, copper mining, tourism, urban growth, and manufacturing.

The center of the District is located approximately 30 miles south of Phoenix and 12 miles northwest of Casa Grande. The District encompasses the City of Maricopa and the Town of Stanfield. Approximately 9,000 acres are owned by the State and leased to farming operations. In the northern portion, the District surrounds the 21,840-acre Ak-Chin Indian Reservation which is an independent governing entity not included in the District.

The District is rural in nature and, at present, consists of approximately 82,000 acres developed for irrigated agriculture. The economy of the District is almost entirely agricultural, although recent years has seen the Town of Maricopa grow to cover about 12,000 acres of land previously farmed in the District. The principal crops produced in the District are cotton, grains, alfalfa, feed grain for dairies, nursery trees, and vegetables. Irrigation to meet project demands within the District is dependent upon groundwater pumped from District operated wells and surface water provided from the Central Arizona Project (CAP) facilities. The surface water from CAP is delivered through a system of canals, laterals, pipelines and appurtenances beginning at the Santa Rosa Canal turnout off the CAP Canal east of the City of Eloy. The District operates and maintains the Santa Rosa Canal as part of its total District operations and is the main recipient of water delivered through the canal; however, it also serves as the watermaster and delivers water

8 through the canal to the Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage District and the Ak-Chin Indian Community.

The overall system consists of 75 miles of open channel main stem canal, 200 miles of open channel laterals and about 20 miles of pipelines. The associated groundwater system consists of a network of 160 wells and appurtenant features. A SCADA control system was implemented on the Main Stem Santa Rosa Canal and the East Main in about 1992. There is no off-line regulatory storage on the project to help regulate operational mismatched flows, emergencies, rain events, or other operational challenges have to be managed within the canal pools available storage. The canal system received its first water in 1987 so the irrigation facilities are about 33 years or older, and original SCADA elements are about 28 years old, therefore aging infrastructure needs to be addressed by the District.

Irrigation and agronomic cultural practices evolve to meet resource limitations and production challenges in order to remain economically viable. Irrigation water management including improved measurement accuracy, control, and application on the farm units is becoming increasingly more sophisticated. This includes the conversion of irrigation systems from gravity applied flood irrigation to other forms of irrigation like micro-sprinklers, center pivot, linear move systems, or drip irrigation. The modern methods tend to use more advanced sensing of inputs and operate most efficiently when water supply is accurate and on demand and can also be shut off when needed. There are also new irrigation technologies being applied on the farm level with surface irrigation, again for these to function optimally water supply needs to be accurate and on demand and also shut off when needed. Due to the installation of these irrigation systems is random throughout the District, they create complex operational challenges and flow mismatches. If these mismatched flows cannot be redistributed to other delivery points in the system are carried downstream and spilled.

Aging infrastructure including leaking gates, deteriorated canal liners, and conveyance of groundwater in these open channels all contribute to additional pumping to make up for conveyance losses. In addition, the lack of flow measurement in the canal system, laterals, and spills, as well as aged and poorly functioning meters on wells and turnouts add to the challenges of good water management and delivery in the District.

9 The subject MSIDD modernization project is in response to the aging and deficient flow measurement equipment, infrastructure and associated SCADA management tools that are needed to modernize and better operate the large network of canals, laterals, pipelines, well pumps and appurtenant features in the most efficient manner. In addition, the support that is requested in this grant application is in Phase I and part of a larger multi-phased Modernization Project to help the district and the end users in being good stewards of natural resources including soil health, surface and groundwater resources in an effort to support long term sustainability of these resources. In response to regional drought and to help support the mitigation of future risk of shortage, impacts to operations by changing irrigation systems from flood to drip and other precision application systems, increased reduction in future surface water supplies, and an increased dependence on groundwater in the future it is critical to move forward with a system modernization that will optimize overall water use, especially groundwater. Again, the project is planned to be Phased and this funding request is associated with Phase I involving SCADA upgrades and improved flow measurement. Subsequent Phases of modernization will include a system optimization study, installation of pipelines and additional integration of wells, regulation storage, SCADA integration, on-farm pump back systems, introduction of new technologies, as well as education and training of District staff and farmers.

Stakeholders in addition to MSIDD include farmers and customers in the District, the Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage (CAIDD), Ak-Chin Indian Community (Ak-Chin) and the US Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation). Further, the entire project area is within the Pinal AMA and is in keeping with the goals of the AMA. The District economy is primarily agricultural and the modernization project will help preserve this economy for as long as feasible, and preserve groundwater resources for future use.

B) The project when completed will allow the District to utilize an upgraded SCADA system that will provide a more robust and responsive irrigation water delivery system. This will include accurate metering at wells integrated into the SCADA system that will be remotely monitored and operated to better match demands. Improved measurement within the main stem canal system and at system spill locations and delivery points integrated into the SCADA and operational system will improve system efficiencies.

10 Adaptation to better serve the changing landscape of irrigations systems that requires an on- demand delivery as well as autonomy to shut off when needed will provide for better on farm efficiencies. This includes traditional surface irrigation that is more efficient if deliveries are not varied and can be shut off when needed. These improved efficiencies translate to less consumptive use and hence less pumped groundwater. In addition, a more responsive canal delivery system will better address any flow mismatches due to operations, weather events, emergencies, or other events. Monitored outfalls at spills will allow for quicker reaction upstream again reducing spills and allowing more efficient use of system flows.

The use of accurate spot flow measurements in the field by ditch tenders (zanjeros) will allow for better in-system flow adjustments and feedback to operations and integration in the SCADA operational system. Farmers also using accurate spot measurements will assist on-farm water management. Again, this will result in more efficient use of system flows resulting in better on farm efficiencies and reduced mismatch outfalls.

The project will result in lower water use due to an improved on-farm and overall operational efficiency. Therefore, the percentage of water use from wells will be directly reduced proportionately. The main canals and laterals in the District remain in service year-round, therefore reductions in flow volumes also result in less evaporative surface area conserving that water resulting in less water pumped. Reference is made to Chart 1 located at the end of this section of the grant application which illustrates the last 10 years of water delivered in acre-feet. From the information there is over 100,000 acre-feet of water being pumped annually in 2019 there was about 125,000 acre-feet pumped. Assuming the project can conserve 5 percent of this pumped water that will yield about 6,250 acre-feet of water annually for future uses.

C) Several metrics can be used to measure and monitor pre and post project water use and reductions in pumping. They include a comparison of historical district and farm delivery water orders adjusted and calibrated to acreage and cropping patterns. Comparison of well operations, power consumption, and upgraded volumetric data. Measurement and comparison of flow mismatches at system outfall locations.

The District based on the final Phase I improvements implemented will develop a water savings measurement approach and groundwater use reduction determination collaboratively with our engineering consultant.

11 D) The 1980 Arizona Groundwater Code established the five Active Management Areas (AMA) including the Pinal AMA with the general goal of the AMA’s being to achieve safe yield of groundwater. Specifically, the Pinal AMA goal is to allow development of non-irrigation uses and to preserve existing agricultural economies in the AMA for as long as feasible, consistent with the necessity to preserve future water supplies for non-irrigation uses.

The proposed project will upon implementation provide advanced technology, strategies, and resources that will help reduce pumping and protect groundwater resources for current and future generations. With the subsequent Phases of the modernization project coupled with the work associated with this grant the Districts ability to support long term efficient use of groundwater will be further enhanced. The result will be improved and on-farm, irrigation district, and groundwater pumping efficiencies. Further, education and training of District personnel, local farmers, and irrigators to use accurate remote flow measurement will help promote a better understanding and respect for the finite groundwater resources in the AMA, and in line with the goals of the AMA.

E) The project will benefit multiple Stakeholders as hydrologically the District, Pinal County and the Lower Colorado River Basin are all interconnected due to the drought and the basin wide approach to conserving Colorado River Water placing added demands directly on the local groundwater resources. The District is a participant in the Drought Contingency Plan (DCP) and therefore is playing a role and wants to ensure the preservation of existing agricultural economies in a sustainable manner. There is an on-going paradigm shift at the District witnessed by the expenditures of financial resources to modernize the project and the collaboration associated stakeholders.

In addition to the MSIDD stakeholders include local farmers, dairies, and other water customers in the District. The Central Arizona Project (CAP) which delivers water delivers water to the system is currently challenged to assist with storing system fluctuations in their canal pools because of the lack of regulatory storage in MSIDD, the project will help mitigate. The Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage District receives their water from the Santa Rosa Canal therefore, improved canal operations from the overall project will ensure steady and accurate deliveries to this large turnout allowing them to better manage irrigation water. The Ak-Chin Indian Community is at the terminus of the project and receives their water allocation wheeled

12 through the District. The overall modernization project will help them receive steady and accurate flows, reduced pumping, and help mitigate on-going water quality issues. The US Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) owns the Ak-Chin lateral system that serves the Indian Community. Further, the entire project area is within the Pinal AMA and is in keeping with the goals of the AMA.

F) The proposed grant request is part of Phase I of a larger multi-phased system modernization project. The goal of the modernization is to upgrade the district to be able to better operate and manage the long-term transition from surface water to groundwater in a responsible and sustainable manner. The District has initiated the Phase I SCADA system upgrade that includes cost sharing from stakeholders like the Ak-Chin Indian Community through the Bureau of Reclamation, and the Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage District please refer to the budget section of this grant application.

The District has initiated a groundwater well integration and optimization study what will evaluate, model and recommend how to interconnect and plumb existing and future wells to meet demands in the most efficient cost-effective manner. This includes accurate flow measurement, pipelines or sealing of canals to reduce water losses, regulatory storage to handle mismatched flows to reduce pumping, all tied into an updated SCADA system. The study will identify the best locations for installation of the grant requested measurement devices.

The District is also active in seeking opportunities and competing for other grants including NRCS, USBR, State and Federal that are applicable in addition to self-funding projects.

G) The grant request is to support part of the larger multi-phased District modernization project. Further, it is also part of the high priority groundwater well meter replacement and upgrade to SCADA integration for improved water management. Existing meters even in ideal hydraulic installations because of age, deterioration and design have flow accuracies that are outside the range of modern state of the art flow meters that can measure within plus or minus a .05 percent. Existing installations have demonstrated the cumulative effects of these inaccuracies and highlighted the opportunity to reduce energy costs and reduce pumping. The District is also looking for a demonstration site to add a variable frequency drive along with the improved measurement in areas that serve drip irrigation filtration stations to reduced mismatched flows and conserve water reducing energy consumption and pumping of groundwater.

13 H) This is a new project required because of the age and deterioration of the existing irrigation delivery and groundwater system that cannot meet the flexibility demands of modern irrigation systems efficiently and the increasing needs to be more efficient on a project wide scale. Therefore, there is no duplication of work product that has been previously performed.

I) The overall modernization project of which this grant proposal request is part of Phase I will remain effective and sustainable over time. The life cycle for the design and implementation of any components is 10 to 20 years for mechanical features and 50 years for structural features. The overall project is designed and built to federal Bureau of Reclamation Standards and therefore any modifications to the system will also meet that design criteria.

Further because the future focus is on flow measurement, operations and management, and optimization of groundwater use; thus, all goals are in-line with AMA, regional and District long term planning for sustainability.

J) Historically irrigation projects locally known as irrigation districts like MSIDD and others in Arizona were all designed and built based on flow capacities. Meaning facilities were designed to control and convey capacities to meet estimated demands. Water control was manually operated and some districts have integrated some form of SCADA and operational control using predictive science, but none are true volumetric control, meaning every drop is accounted for with the goal of zero spill.

Current state of the art design is operations based, meaning that instead of designing and building a system that you try and force to operate how you need it too, you establish operational criteria and with the use of unsteady-state hydraulic models that can work through many scenarios arriving at the most cost effective concepts for a particular project. Recent design completed by George Cairo Engineering, Inc. (GCE) on the Gila River Indian Community Pima-Maricopa Irrigation Project is the first to use this approach in the United States. There is actually one 16- mile canal that will be the first Total Channel Control zero spill designed canal in Arizona more sophisticated than the CAP canal with all structures and turnouts automated and all inputs and outputs measured.

Modernization of irrigation projects like the MSIDD involves taking an older system that is based on flow design and in this case integrated with wells and modifying it to be flexible and

14 operate efficiently to meet demands thereby conserving water and energy, and in this case reduce groundwater pumping.

This translates directly to virtually all irrigation districts, water projects, Native Nation water projects in Arizona within the Pinal AMA and the balance of the state. The limiting factor becomes generally acceptance of concepts meaning a change in culture, and secondly lack of financial resources. There has been a sharp increase in the regional interest in system optimization studies and introduction of flow measurement and other operational improvements because of the impending drought, competing interest for water resources, and the availability of grant funding.

CHART 1: MSIDD TOTAL ACRE FEET DELIVERED IN THE LAST 10 YEARS 350,000

300,000

250,000 204,288

200,000 195,041 165,909 142,708 150,921 155,721 140,182 158,229 118,882 166,009

150,000 182,107 ACRE FEET

100,000

50,000 127,960 125,026 123,717 122,778 121,523 119,186 118,312 115,244 113,722 98,318 80,942 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 YEAR

Well Water CAP Water

15 Scope of Work

16 SCOPE OF WORK:

The following is the general scope of work associated with the grant application. Note Task 1 is summarized as part of the overall work in Phase I, however there is no funding request associated with it. All funding is requested as parts of Tasks 2 and 3. The overall general scope is as presented below:

TASK 1 SCADA System Upgrade

a) Task 1 b) SCADA System Upgrade c) The Purpose of this task is to upgrade the original SCADA system for the main stem canal that was developed primarily in-house between 1987 and completed in 1992. The objective is to upgrade the SCADA system to better operate the main stem canal system, reduce flow mismatches, and deliver constant steady flows resulting in water savings and reduced groundwater pumping. d) The system works but parts and equipment are no longer available and system sites have been failing. Now, there is much more robust and reliable sensors, radios, telemetry, and irrigation system compatible SCADA ready software. Task 1 activities will include the following: • Upgrade the District’s approximately 28 years old existing Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition system (SCADA). Upgrades include ignition software, PC stations, radio system, remote terminal units (RTU) panels, electrical work, power supply, encoder, inclinometer, potentiometer, level sensors, and other appurtenances. • Provide engineering, programming, and startup of an updated SCADA system. • Provide training on the use of the operating system, as well as operation and maintenance manuals. e) Consultant and District personnel. f) Upgraded SCADA System is the final deliverable to include: • Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition system (SCADA). Including ignition software, PC stations, radio system, remote terminal units (RTU) panels, electrical

17 work, power supply, encoder, inclinometer, potentiometer, level sensors, and other appurtenances for each main canal check structure. • Engineering, programming, and startup of the updated SCADA system. • Provision of training on the use of the operating system, as well as provision of operation and maintenance manuals. g) Deliverable due date is December 15, 2020.

TASK 2 Well Flow Meter Replacements

a) Task 2 b) Well Flow Meter Replacements c) The primary purpose of Task 2 will be to purchase and install accurate flow measurement devices for 38 well sites (out of 160 active well sites within the District). The objective is to study and determine the 38 most poorly performing wells with respect to metering, output volume, demands on the wells, and location in the system to prioritize to obtain maximum benefit and water savings. Improve reporting of well data to ADWR. d) Purchase and install accurate flow measurement for selected 38 well sites (out of 160 active well sites within the District). Task 2 activities will include the following: • Purchase 38 promag meters to replace the existing inaccurate flow meters. • Remove the existing meters and install new meters. • Test and commission new meters and miscellaneous work. e) MSIDD personnel will plan, coordinate and complete the installation of the units. As needed their engineering consultant will perform certification, performance testing and commissioning. f) The deliverable is 38 installed and commissioned well flow measurement installations. g) Deliverable due date is December 15, 2020 meaning all meters would be purchased and installed.

18 TASK 3 Turnout Flow Measurement and Manual Measurement Probes

a) Task 3 b) Turnout Flow Measurement and Manual Measurement Probes c) The primary purpose of Task 3 will be to purchase and install accurate flow measurement for 51 turnouts off of the main canal and lateral system, purchase 27 flow measurement probes for system operation, design of two new turnouts with flow measurements, design for an accurate flow measurement system at the main canal bifurcation, design for an accurate flow measurement at 5 spill locations. The objective will be to obtain better flow data at lateral headings that can be incorporated into the main stem canal operations to reduce mismatches and system losses. In addition, with the use of accurate manual measurement probes the water supply carried down system laterals can be bifurcated and delivered accurately to provide better service to end users resulting in better on-farm water management and less tail end mismatched flows and system losses. Spill measurement data will provide feedback to operations that will be able to better react and cutback flows to reduce system losses. Design and installation of flow measurement at the main stem bifurcations is critical to better divide the in-flows into the 2 main stems that serve the district, this will reduce pumping because less make up water will be needed to address error in the flow split. All activities in the task will work in concert along with other tasks to operate more efficiently and reduce groundwater pumping. d) Task 3 activities will include the following: • Purchase and install 51 flow measurement units for lateral heading turnouts off the main canal system. 40 obsolete old badger meters on the turnouts will be replaced with new state of the art MACE meters, 2 new turnouts will require MACE meters, 9 existing turnouts have inadequate impeller meters that constantly plugs up and will need to be replaced with MACE meters or an alternative meter. • Purchase 27 state of the art manual flow measurement probe for system operation water balancing (15 units for District zanjeros, 10 units for farmers, 2 spare units). • Design two new lateral heading turnouts with flow accurate flow measurement. Construction shall be in future Phase II. • Design flow measurement system at the main canal bifurcation. Construction shall be in future Phase II.

19 • Design for flow measurement at 5 spill locations to monitor outfalls at the spills to allow feedback for quicker reaction upstream to reduce mismatches and system spills. Construction shall be in future Phase II. e) MSIDD personnel will plan, coordinate and complete the installation of all the units. As needed their engineering consultant will perform certification, performance testing and commissioning. Design of flow measurement stations at lateral headings and main canal bifurcations shall be completed by outside consultant. f) Project deliverables will be as follows: • The deliverable is 51 installed and commissioned lateral heading flow measurement installations. • The deliverable will be delivery of 27 flow measurement probes and on-site hands on training for ditch tenders and local farmers by consultant or vendor. • The design deliverable will be 30, 75, and 100 percent design plans, specifications and engineers estimate for the design of flow measurement at the main stem bifurcation. • The design deliverable will be 30, 75, and 100 percent design plans, specifications and engineers estimate for the design of flow measurement at two new lateral heading turnouts. • The design deliverable will be 30, 75, and 100 percent design plans, specifications and engineers estimate for the design of flow measurement at 5 system spill locations. g) Deliverable due date is December 15, 2020 meaning all lateral heading flow meters would be purchased and installed, all flow measurement probes will be supplied and training completed, and flow measurement design plans, specifications and estimates shall be completed.

20 Budget Breakdown

21 APPENDIX 4: Budget Breakdown & Narrative Budget Breakdown Sheet Pumping Efficiency Project - Phase I Infrastructure Modernization & SCADA Upgrades Task 1: Task 2: Task 3: Budget Categories Total SCADA System Upgrades SCADA Ready Flow SCADA Ready Flow Measurement for Well Measurement for Turnouts Pumps and Spills a. Personnel $ 12,119.20 $ 9,196.40 $ 14,310.80 $ 35,626.40 b. Fringe Benefits c. Travel $ 220.80 $ 218.50 $ 940.13 $ 1,379.43 d. Equipment $ 162,991.27 $ 438,651.61 $ 601,642.88 e. Supplies $ 125.00 $ 187.50 $ 250.00 $ 562.50 f. Contractual $ 460,529.20 $ 5,000.00 $ 143,500.00 $ 609,029.20 g. Construction $ 4,922.40 $ 5,553.32 $ 8,562.84 $ 19,038.56 h. Other i. Total Direct Charges $ 477,916.60 $ 183,146.99 $ 606,215.38 $ 1,267,278.97 (sum of a-h) j. Total Indirect Charges (10% of $ 47,791.66 $ 18,314.70 $ 60,621.54 $ 126,727.90 Direct Costs) k. Overall Project Totals $ 525,708.26 $ 201,461.69 $ 666,836.91 $ 1,394,006.87 (sum of i and j) l. Cost Share/Contribution by $ 399,708.26 $ 101,461.69 $ 616,836.91 $ 1,118,006.87 MSIDD m. Cost Share/Contribution by $ 120,000.00 $ 120,000.00 US BOR (Ak-Chin) n. Cost Share/Contribution by $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 CAIDD o. Total Project Budget Requests from ADWR Grant $ 100,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 150,000.00 (Only Part d. Equipment, Partial Costs of Part d.)

22 Budget Narrative

23 MARICOPA-STANFIELD MARICOPA IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE DISTRICT

PUMPING REDUCTION PROJECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND SCADA UPGRADES

BUDGET NARRATIVE FY2020

24 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The MSIDD modernization project is in response to aging and deficient equipment, infrastructure and associated SCADA management tools that need to be upgraded to better operate the large network of canals, laterals, pipelines, well pumps and appurtenant features. The project is part of a larger Multi-Phased project and this funding request is associated with parts of Phase I involving SCADA upgrades and improved flow measurement to reduce mismatched flows resulting in reduced groundwater pumping.

TOTAL MONEY REQUEST: $150,000.00 The total award is proposed to be spent between the tasks as follows, note no funds are being requested for Task 1 that is being paid by MSIDD and other contributing stakeholders: 1) Task 1: SCADA System Upgrades 2) Task 2: SCADA Ready Flow Measurement for Well Pumps 3) Task 3: SCADA Ready Flow Measurement for Turnouts and Spills

Task 1: The primary purpose of Task 1 will be to upgrade the District’s SCADA system. Task 1 activities will include the following:

• Upgrade the District’s approximately 28 years old existing Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition system (SCADA). Upgrades include ignition software, PC stations, radio system, remote terminal units (RTU) panels, electrical work, power supply, encoder, inclinometer, potentiometer, level sensors, and other appurtenances. • Provide engineering, programming, and startup of an updated SCADA system. • Provide training on the use of the operating system, as well as operation and maintenance manuals.

Cost Narrative for Task 1 (see attached table):

a. Personnel 1. The project will require an estimated 40 hours of work performed by MSIDD staff Metering Supervisor at the hourly rate of $27.62.

25 2. The project will require an estimated 160 hours of work performed by MSIDD staff System Operator at the hourly rate of $17.13. 3. The project will require an estimated 100 hours of work performed by MSIDD staff Maintenance Operator at the hourly rate of $18.18. 4. The project will require an estimated 80 hours of work performed by MSIDD staff Maintenance Supervisor at the hourly rate of $29.71. 5. The project will require an estimated 80 hours of work performed by MSIDD staff Water Operator Supervisor at the hourly rate of $27.93. 6. The project will require an estimated 120 hours of work performed by MSIDD staff Water Operator at the hourly rate of $15.37. b. Fringe Benefits: N/A c. Travel 1. The project will require an estimated of 3 meetings with the SCADA Consultant, IPT at the acceptable IRS mileage rate of $0.575 per mile. Travel distance for round trip is approximately 68 miles multiplied by 3 trips. 2. The project will require an estimated of 2 meetings with the Technical Consultant, GCE at the acceptable IRS mileage rate of $0.575 per mile. Travel distance for round trip is approximately 90 miles multiplied by 2 trips. d. Equipment: Equipment will be included under f. Contractual with IPT Co. e. Supplies: 1. The project will require an estimated of 500 sheets for design data, equipment specifications, operation manuals, etc. at the District’s cost of $0.25 per sheet. f. Contractual with Consultant (the following cost are quotes from the Supplier and Consultant) 1. The project will include updating the radio system, 902-928 MHz licensed system to provide reliable long-range data transportation, transparent data communications for SCADA/Telemetry, and EFM protocols including MODBUS. The radio system will cost $132,000. 2. The project will include updating remote terminal units (RTU) panels and installation, including Nema 4 enclosures, power supply, radio transceiver, and related appurtenances. The cost for this portion is $189098.80.

26 3. The cost for replacing the inclinometer is $19,410.60. 4. The cost for replacing the potentiometer is $9,391.80. 5. The engineer/development/configuration cost will be approximately $20,328.00. 6. The project startup/testing/training cost will be approximately $70,840.000 7. The work will include technical assistance for SCADA support, approximately $9,460.00. 8. The project will require Technical Consultation for Operation and Engineering and the assumption is to not exceed $10,000. g. Construction: 1. The project will require MSIDD staff Maintenance Operator to work with IPT Co. for the SCADA equipment installation and testing. An estimated 120 hours of work will be required at the hourly rate of $18.18. 2. The project will require MSIDD staff System Operator to work with IPT Co. for the SCADA equipment installation and testing. An estimated 160 hours of work will be required at the hourly rate of $17.13. h. Other: N/A

27 Budget Breakdown Sheet Task 1: SCADA System Upgrades Budget Categories Total Rate Quantity a. Personnel $ 12,119.20 1. MSIDD Metering Supervisor $ 27.62 40 $ 1,104.80 2. MSIDD System Operator $ 17.13 160 $ 2,740.80 3. MSIDD Maintenance Operator $ 18.18 100 $ 1,818.00 4. MSIDD Maintenance Supervisor $ 29.71 80 $ 2,376.80 5. MSIDD Water Operator Supervisor $ 27.93 80 $ 2,234.40 6. MSIDD Water Operator $ 15.37 120 $ 1,844.40 b. Fringe Benefits $ - N/A $ - c. Travel $ 220.80 1. Meeting with IPT, Co. $ 0.575 204 $ 117.30 2. Meetings with Consultants $ 0.575 180 $ 103.50 d. Equipment $ - Included in IPT Co. Contract e. Supplies $ 125.00 1. Reproduction $ 0.25 500 $ 125.00 f. Contractual w/ IPT Co. $ 460,529.20 1. Radios $ 132,000.00 1 $ 132,000.00

2. Panels (RTU's+Install) $ 189,098.80 1 $ 189,098.80 3. Inclinometer $ 19,410.60 1 $ 19,410.60 4. Potentiometer $ 9,391.80 1 $ 9,391.80 5. Engrs/Dvlpmt/Config $ 20,328.00 1 $ 20,328.00 6. Startup/Testing/Training $ 70,840.00 1 $ 70,840.00 7. Tech Asistance for SCADA $ 9,460.00 1 $ 9,460.00 8. Technical Consultation Operations/Engineering $ 10,000.00 1 $ 10,000.00 g. Construction $ 4,922.40 1. MSIDD Maintenance Operator $ 18.18 120 $ 2,181.60

2. MSIDD System Operator $ 17.13 160 $ 2,740.80

h. Other $ - $ - i. Total Direct Charges (sum of a-h) $ 477,916.60 j. Total Indirect Charges (10% of Direct Charges) $ 47,791.66 k. Overal Project Totals (sum of i and j) $ 525,708.26 l. Cost Share/Contribution by MSIDD $ 399,708.26 m. Cost Share/Contribution by US BOR (Ak-Chin Indian $ 120,000.00 Community) n. Cost Share/Contribution by CAIDD $ 6,000.00 o. Total Project Budget Requests from ADWR Grant $ 0.00 (None)

28 Task 2: The primary purpose of Task 2 will be to purchase and install accurate flow measurement for 38 selected well sites (out of 160 active well sites within the District). Task 2 activities will include the following:

• Purchase 38 promag meters to replace the existing inaccurate flow meters. • Remove the existing meters and install new meters. • Test new meters and miscellaneous work.

Cost Narrative for Task 2 (see attached table):

a. Personnel 1. The project will require an estimated 160 hours of work performed by MSIDD staff System Operator at the hourly rate of $17.13. 2. The project will require an estimated 80 hours of work performed by MSIDD staff Maintenance Supervisor at the hourly rate of $29.71. 3. The project will require an estimated 80 hours of work performed by MSIDD staff Water Operator Supervisor at the hourly rate of $27.93. 4. The project will require an estimated 120 hours of work performed by MSIDD staff Water Operator at the hourly rate of $15.37. b. Fringe Benefits: N/A c. Travel 1. The project will require an estimated of 1 round trip to each site for the meter installation at the acceptable IRS mileage rate of $0.575 per mile. Travel distance for round trip is approximately 10 miles per site multiplied by 38 sites. d. Equipment: 1. The project will require purchasing 38 Endress+Hauser Promag Meters for each of the well site location at the rate of approximately $4,289.24 per Supplier quote submitted to the District. e. Supplies: 1. The project will require an estimated of 750 sheets for design data, equipment specifications, operation manuals, etc. at the District’s cost of $0.25 per sheet. f. Contractual with Consultant.

29 1. The project will require Technical Consultation for Operation and Engineering and the assumption is to not exceed $5,000. g. Construction: 1. The project will require MSIDD staff Maintenance Operator to install the Promag Meter at the hourly rate of $18.18. An estimated 5 hours per site multiplied by 38 sites. 2. The project will require MSIDD staff Metering Supervisor to oversee the installation of the Promag Meter at the hourly rate of $27.62. An estimated 2 hours per site multiplied by 38 sites. h. Other: N/A

30 Budget Breakdown Sheet Task 2: Flow Measurement for Well Budget Categories Pumps Total Rate Quantity a. Personnel $ 9,196.40 1. MSIDD System Operator $ 17.13 160 $ 2,740.80 2. MSIDD Maintenance Supervisor $ 29.71 80 $ 2,376.80 3. MSIDD Water Operator Supervisor $ 27.93 80 $ 2,234.40 4. MSIDD Water Operator $ 15.37 120 $ 1,844.40 $ - $ - b. Fringe Benefits $ - N/A $ - c. Travel $ 218.50 1. Avg Round Trip to Each Site (10mi/site* 38 sites) $ 0.575 380 $ 218.50 d. Equipment $ 162,991.27 1. Endress+Hauser ProMag Meter for Well Pumps $ 4,289.24 38 $ 162,991.27 e. Supplies $ 187.50 1. Reproduction $ 0.25 750 $ 187.50 f. Contractual $ 5,000.00 1. Technical Consultation $ 5,000.00 1 $ 5,000.00

g. Construction $ 5,553.32 1. MSIDD Maintenance Operator - ProMag Meter $ 18.18 190 $ 3,454.20 Installation (5hr/site*38) 2. MSIDD Metering Supervisor - ProMag Meter $ 27.62 76 $ 2,099.12 Installation (2hr/site*38)

h. Other $ - $ - i. Total Direct Charges (sum of a-h) $ 183,146.99 j. Total Indirect Charges (10% of Direct Charges) $ 18,314.70 k. Overal Project Totals (sum of i and j) $ 201,461.69 l. Cost Share/Contribution by MSIDD $ 101,461.69 m. Cost Share/Contribution by US BOR (Ak-Chin Indian Community) n. Cost Share/Contribution by CAIDD o. Total Project Budget Requests from ADWR Grant $ 100,000.00 (Only Part d. Equipment)

31 Task 3: The primary purpose of Task 3 will be to purchase and install accurate flow measurement for 51 turnouts off of the main canal system, purchase 27 flow measurement probes for system operation, design of two new turnouts with flow measurements, design for an accurate flow measurement system at the main canal bifurcation, design for an accurate flow measurement at 5 spill locations. Task 3 activities will include the following:

• Purchase and install 51 flow measurements for turnouts off the main canal system. 40 obsolete old badger meters on the turnouts will be replaced with MACE meters, 2 new turnouts will require MACE meters, 9 existing turnouts have inadequate impeller meters that constantly plugs up and will need to be replaced with MACE meters or an alternative meter. • Purchase 27 flow measurement probe for system operation (15 for zanjeros, 10 for farmers, 2 spares). • Design two new turnouts with flow measurements. • Design to improve flow measurement system at the main canal bifurcation. • Design for flow measurement at 5 spill locations to monitor outfalls at the spills to allow quicker reaction upstream and reduce spills.

Cost Narrative for Task 3 (see attached table):

i. Personnel 1. The project will require an estimated 120 hours of work performed by MSIDD staff System Operator at the hourly rate of $17.13. 2. The project will require an estimated 200 hours of work performed by MSIDD staff Maintenance Supervisor at the hourly rate of $29.71. 3. The project will require an estimated 160 hours of work performed by MSIDD staff Water Operator Supervisor at the hourly rate of $27.93. 4. The project will require an estimated 120 hours of work performed by MSIDD staff Water Operator at the hourly rate of $15.37. j. Fringe Benefits: N/A k. Travel 1. The project will require an estimated of 1 round trip to each site for the meter installation at the acceptable IRS mileage rate of $0.575 per mile. Travel

32 distance for round trip is approximately 25 miles per site multiplied by 51 sites. 2. The project will require an estimated of 4 meetings with the Technical Consultant, GCE at the acceptable IRS mileage rate of $0.575 per mile. Travel distance for round trip is approximately 90 miles multiplied by 4 trips. l. Equipment: 1. The project will require purchasing 42 MACE meters for each of the turnout site location at the rate of approximately $7,835.03 per Supplier quote submitted to the District. 2. The project will require purchasing 9 flow meters for each of the turnout site location at the rate of approximately $8,000.00 per MACE meter or equivalent alternative meter. 3. The project will require purchasing 27 flow measurement probes at the rate of approximately $1,391.87 per Supplier quote submitted to the District. m. Supplies: 1. The project will require an estimated of 1000 sheets for design data, equipment specifications, operation manuals, etc. at the District’s cost of $0.25 per sheet. n. Contractual with GCE, Inc. 1. The project will require designing two main canal turnouts with flow measurements at the estimated lump sum cost of $15,000.00 per turnout. 2. The project will require designing an accurate flow measurement at the main canal bifurcation at the estimated lump sum cost $40,000.00. 3. The project will require designing for an accurate flow measurement at 5 spill locations at the estimated lump sum cost of $10,000.00 per spill site. 4. The project will require Technical Consultation for System Optimization and Engineering and the assumption is to not exceed $23,500. o. Construction: 1. The project will require MSIDD staff Maintenance Operator to install the MACE Meter at the hourly rate of $18.18. An estimated 6 hours per site multiplied by 42 sites.

33 2. The project will require MSIDD staff Metering Supervisor to oversee the installation of the MACE Meter at the hourly rate of $27.62. An estimated 4 hours per site multiplied by 42 sites. 3. The project will require MSIDD staff Maintenance Operator to install the Flow Meter at the hourly rate of $18.18. An estimated 6 hours per site multiplied by 9 sites. 4. The project will require MSIDD staff Metering Supervisor to oversee the installation of the Flow Meter at the hourly rate of $27.62. An estimated 4 hours per site multiplied by 9 sites. p. Other: N/A

34 Budget Breakdown Sheet Task 3: Flow Measurement for Budget Categories Turnouts & Spills Total Rate Quantity a. Personnel $ 14,310.80 1. MSIDD System Operator $ 17.13 120 $ 2,055.60 2. MSIDD Maintenance Supervisor $ 29.71 200 $ 5,942.00 3. MSIDD Water Operator Supervisor $ 27.93 160 $ 4,468.80 4. MSIDD Water Operator $ 15.37 120 $ 1,844.40 b. Fringe Benefits $ - N/A $ - c. Travel $ 940.13 1. Avg Round Trip to Each Site (25mi/site* 51 sites) $ 0.575 1275 $ 733.13 2. Meeting with Consultants $ 0.575 360 $ 207.00 d. Equipment $ 438,651.61 1. MACE Meter for Turnouts (42 sites) $ 7,835.03 42 $ 329,071.18 2. Flow Meter for Turnouts (9 sites) $ 8,000.00 9 $ 72,000.00 3. Probe Flow Measurement $ 1,391.87 27 $ 37,580.44 e. Supplies $ 250.00 1. Reproduction $ 0.25 1000 $ 250.00 f. Contractual w/ GCE, Inc. $ 143,500.00 1. Design of Main Lateral Turnout with Flow $ 15,000.00 2 $ 30,000.00 Measurement (2 Sites) 2. Design of Flow Measurement at Main Canal Split (1 $ 40,000.00 1 $ 40,000.00 Site) 3. Design of Flow Measurement for Spill Sites (5 Sites) $ 10,000.00 5 $ 50,000.00 4. Technical Consultation $ 23,500.00 1 $ 23,500.00

g. Construction $ 8,562.84 1. MSIDD Maintenance Operator - MACE Meter $ 18.18 180 $ 3,272.40 Installation (6hr/site*42 sites) 2. MSIDD Metering Supervisor - MACE Meter $ 27.62 120 $ 3,314.40 Installation (4hr/site*42 sites) 3. MSIDD Maintenance Operator - Flow Meter $ 18.18 54 $ 981.72 Installation (6hr/site*9 sites) 4. MSIDD Metering Supervisor - Flow Meter Installation $ 27.62 36 $ 994.32 (4hr/site*9 sites) h. Other $ - i. Total Direct Charges (sum of a-h) $ 606,215.38 j. Total Indirect Charges (10% of Direct Charges) $ 60,621.54 k. Overal Project Totals (sum of i and j) $ 666,836.91 l. Cost Share/Contribution by MSIDD $ 616,836.91 m. Cost Share/Contribution by US BOR (Ak-Chin Indian Community) n. Cost Share/Contribution by CAIDD o. Total Project Budget Requests from ADWR Grant $ 50,000.00 (Only Part d. Equipment)

35 Additional Contribution Breakdown

36 Budget Breakdown Sheet Task 1: SCADA System Upgrades Budget Categories Total Rate Quantity a. Personnel $ 12,119.20 1. MSIDD Metering Supervisor $ 27.62 40 $ 1,104.80 2. MSIDD System Operator $ 17.13 160 $ 2,740.80 3. MSIDD Maintenance Operator $ 18.18 100 $ 1,818.00 4. MSIDD Maintenance Supervisor $ 29.71 80 $ 2,376.80 5. MSIDD Water Operator Supervisor $ 27.93 80 $ 2,234.40 6. MSIDD Water Operator $ 15.37 120 $ 1,844.40 b. Fringe Benefits $ - N/A $ - c. Travel $ 220.80 1. Meeting with IPT, Co. $ 0.575 204 $ 117.30 2. Meetings with Consultants $ 0.575 180 $ 103.50 d. Equipment $ - Included in IPT Co. Contract e. Supplies $ 125.00 1. Reproduction $ 0.25 500 $ 125.00 f. Contractual w/ IPT Co. $ 460,529.20 1. Radios $ 132,000.00 1 $ 132,000.00

2. MSIDD System Operator $ 17.13 160 $ 2,740.80

37 Budget Breakdown Sheet Task 2: Flow Measurement for Well Budget Categories Pumps Total Rate Quantity a. Personnel $ 9,196.40 1. MSIDD System Operator $ 17.13 160 $ 2,740.80 2. MSIDD Maintenance Supervisor $ 29.71 80 $ 2,376.80 3. MSIDD Water Operator Supervisor $ 27.93 80 $ 2,234.40 4. MSIDD Water Operator $ 15.37 120 $ 1,844.40 $ - $ - b. Fringe Benefits $ - N/A $ - c. Travel $ 218.50 1. Avg Round Trip to Each Site (10mi/site* 38 sites) $ 0.575 380 $ 218.50 d. Equipment $ 162,991.27 1. Endress+Hauser ProMag Meter for Well Pumps $ 4,289.24 38 $ 162,991.27 e. Supplies $ 187.50 1. Reproduction $ 0.25 750 $ 187.50 f. Contractual $ 5,000.00 1. Technical Consultation $ 5,000.00 1 $ 5,000.00

38 Budget Breakdown Sheet Task 3: Flow Measurement for Budget Categories Turnouts & Spills Total Rate Quantity a. Personnel $ 14,310.80 1. MSIDD System Operator $ 17.13 120 $ 2,055.60 2. MSIDD Maintenance Supervisor $ 29.71 200 $ 5,942.00 3. MSIDD Water Operator Supervisor $ 27.93 160 $ 4,468.80 4. MSIDD Water Operator $ 15.37 120 $ 1,844.40 b. Fringe Benefits $ - N/A $ - c. Travel $ 940.13 1. Avg Round Trip to Each Site (25mi/site* 51 sites) $ 0.575 1275 $ 733.13 2. Meeting with Consultants $ 0.575 360 $ 207.00 d. Equipment $ 438,651.61 1. MACE Meter for Turnouts (42 sites) $ 7,835.03 42 $ 329,071.18 2. Flow Meter for Turnouts (9 sites) $ 8,000.00 9 $ 72,000.00 3. Probe Flow Measurement $ 1,391.87 27 $ 37,580.44 e. Supplies $ 250.00 1. Reproduction $ 0.25 1000 $ 250.00 f. Contractual w/ GCE, Inc. $ 143,500.00 1. Design of Main Lateral Turnout with Flow $ 15,000.00 2 $ 30,000.00 Measurement (2 Sites) 2. Design of Flow Measurement at Main Canal Split (1 $ 40,000.00 1 $ 40,000.00 Site) 3. Design of Flow Measurement for Spill Sites (5 Sites) $ 10,000.00 5 $ 50,000.00 4. Technical Consultation $ 23,500.00 1 $ 23,500.00

39 Supplemental Information:

Evidence of Physical and Legal Availability of Water

40 The Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage District (“District”) is a political subdivision and municipal corporation of the State of Arizona which was formed on July 23, 1962, by an order of the Board of Supervisors of Pinal County, for the purpose of providing a supply of surface water and ground water (irrigation water) for agricultural use by means of constructing and operating irrigation works. See, Excess Water Contract with CAWCD, Attachment A; and Attachment B, and Attachment C Well Lease Agreement.

The Maricopa Stanfield-Irrigation & Drainage District Board of Directors is authorized to acquire water rights, real estate and personal property; construct or acquire canals, water, water rights, rights-of-way and other irrigation works; provide for the construction, operation, leasing and control of electrical generation and distribution plants; establish charges for water or electricity; defend and prosecute legal proceedings; enter into construction contracts after solicitation of sealed bids; acquire by purchase or condemnation, existing irrigation systems or rights-of-way necessary for irrigation works; levy taxes and assessments on real property in the District; provide the District with water and electricity; and engage in all activities, enterprises and occupations within the powers and privileges of municipalities generally under State law. After obtaining the approval of the District’s voters in a duly held election, the District is authorized to issue bonds and to enter into obligations to, or contracts with, the United States Government for the purpose of constructing irrigation works or supplying water for the District. Certain District property, including irrigation works and water rights, is exempt from the State and municipal taxes; however, the District is liable to the State for the groundwater withdrawal fee imposed pursuant to the Arizona Groundwater Management Act.

In the late 1980s, in addition to the anticipated introduction of surface water from the establishment of the Central Arizona Project, the District entered into Well Lease Agreements (Attachment B) with District landowners, providing the District with operational control of the subject wells to pump groundwater for irrigation purposes attributable to the corresponding irrigation grandfathered water right (IFGR). See, Attachment C list of IGFR numbers corresponding to the District’s Well Lease Agreements.

“Landowner does hereby authorize District to exclusively use all of Landowner's rights to pump ground water for irrigation purposes attributable to the irrigation grandfathered water right described in Exhibit 1 and, in order to accomplish the foregoing, does hereby lease to the District the exclusive control of the Wells and appurtenant equipment and facilities and does further lease to District a well site of sufficient size to allow for the operation and maintenance, repairs and replacement but not to exceed a 75-foot radius centered on each well described in Exhibit 2, subject to existing uses within said site.”

The District currently has operational control of over 350 wells within the District.

The District provides a combination of surface and groundwater to its customers through over 200 miles of canals, laterals, pipelines and appurtenances beginning at the “Santa Rosa” turnout on the CAP Canal east of the town of Eloy. Although the District operates and maintains the Project and is the main recipient of CAP water, deliveries are also made through the Project to the Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage District and the Ak-Chin Indian Community.

41 MSIDD - Attachment A

42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 Evidence of Control and Tenure of Land

56 MSIDD - Attachment B

57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 MSIDD - Attachment C

List of IGFR Numbers Associated with the Wells MSIDD Has Operational Control Over

IGFR Number IGFR Number IGFR Number IGFR Number IGFR Number IGFR Number

58- 100025.0010 58- 102333.0021 58- 103655.0036 58- 107311.0000 58- 109254.0022 58- 113181.00011 58- 100140.0013 58- 102336.0003 58- 103655.0037 58- 107312.0001 58- 109708.0013 58- 113181.0007 58- 100159.0002 58- 102336.0006 58- 103655.0038 58- 107312.0002 58- 109708.0014 58- 113337.0007 58- 100159.0003 58- 102336.0007 58- 103655.0039 58- 107313.0001 58- 109708.0016 58- 113338.0006 58- 100182.0007 58- 102337.0001 58- 103655.0040 58- 107313.0002 58- 109708.0018 58- 113338.0007 58- 100182.0008 58- 102339.0003 58- 103655.0041 58- 107313.0003 58- 109708.0022 58- 113560.0002 58- 100189.0010 58- 102342.0017 58- 103655.0042 58- 107314.0000 58- 109709.0010 58- 113560.0008 58- 100743.0002 58- 102342.0018 58- 103655.0043 58- 107322.0001 58- 109709.0011 58- 113560.0014 58- 100940.0003 58- 102342.0021 58- 103655.0044 58- 107768.0005 58- 109710.0007 58- 113560.0015 58- 100951.0000 58- 102342.0022 58- 103655.0045 58- 107813.0003 58- 109710.0009 58- 113560.0016 58- 100964.0001 58- 102342.0023 58- 103655.0046 58- 107813.0004 58- 109710.0010 58- 113560.0017 58- 101082.0006 58- 102342.0028 58- 103655.0047 58- 107813.0005 58- 109711.0012 58- 113560.0018 58- 101082.0007 58- 102342.0029 58- 103655.0048 58- 107813.0005 58- 109711.0013 58- 115521.0006 58- 101082.0008 58- 102342.0036 58- 103658.0001 58- 107827.0001 58- 109711.0014 58- 115521.0007 58- 101083.0001 58- 102342.0037 58- 103674.0001 58- 107828.0001 58- 109711.0015 58- 150002.0002 58- 101083.0002 58- 102342.0038 58- 103674.0002 58- 107830.0008 58- 109711.0016 58- 150005.0001 58- 101084.0004 58- 102342.0039 58- 103674.0003 58- 107830.0009 58- 109711.0017 58- 150006.0002 58- 101084.0005 58- 102342.0041 58- 103674.0004 58- 107830.0010 58- 109711.0018 58- 150007.0001 58- 101084.0006 58- 102399.0004 58- 103675.0000 58- 107830.0011 58- 109711.0019 58- 150008.0002 58- 101085.0004 58- 102399.0005 58- 103676.0001 58- 107830.0012 58- 109711.0020 58- 150009.0001 58- 101085.0007 58- 102399.0008 58- 103947.0003 58- 107830.0013 58- 109711.0021 58- 150010.0001 58- 101085.0008 58- 102399.0009 58- 103979.0010 58- 107830.0014 58- 109711.0022 58- 150011.0003 58- 101085.0009 58- 102399.0010 58- 104151.0002 58- 107830.0015 58- 109711.0024 58- 150011.0004 58- 101199.0005 58- 102399.0011 58- 104158.0003 58- 108292.0006 58- 109711.0025 58- 150012.0002 58- 101199.0006 58- 102399.0014 58- 104171.0004 58- 108292.0012 58- 109711.0026 58- 150013.0002 58- 101357.0009 58- 102625.0004 58- 104171.0005 58- 108292.0014 58- 109711.0027 58- 150014.0002 58- 101357.0010 58- 102653.0000 58- 104171.0006 58- 109250.0003 58- 109937.0013 58- 150015.0003 58- 101357.0011 58- 102654.0001 58- 104172.0003 58- 109250.0009 58- 109937.0014 58- 150016.0001 58- 101357.0016 58- 102655.0000 58- 104174.0007 58- 109250.0013 58- 109937.0015 58- 150016.0003 58- 101553.0005 58- 102665.0015 58- 104174.0008 58- 109250.0092 58- 109937.0020 58- 150017.0002

K:\MSIDD\1. ADMIN\Grant Applications\Attachment C - List of IGFR Numbers66 Page 1 of 3 IGFR Number IGFR Number IGFR Number IGFR Number IGFR Number IGFR Number 58- 101553.0006 58- 102665.0016 58- 104174.0009 58- 109250.0094 58- 109937.0021 58- 150017.0003 58- 101553.0007 58- 102665.0017 58- 104410.0003 58- 109250.0095 58- 109937.0022 58- 150018.0002 58- 101553.0017 58- 102665.0018 58- 104650.0001 58- 109250.0107 58- 109937.0023 58- 150018.0003 58- 101553.0018 58- 102716.0005 58- 104814.0001 58- 109250.0110 58- 109937.0024 58- 150019.0001 58- 101553.0019 58- 102716.0007 58- 104815.0002 58- 109250.0111 58- 110078.0000 58- 150020.0005 58- 101553.0022 58- 102740.0014 58- 105167.0006 58- 109250.0112 58- 110744.0003 58- 150020.0007 58- 101553.0023 58- 102740.0015 58- 105167.0007 58- 109250.0115 58- 111197.0003 58- 150020.0008 58- 101553.0024 58- 102847.0000 58- 105167.0008 58- 109250.0116 58- 111198.0000 58- 150020.0010 58- 101553.0025 58- 102991.0003 58- 105553.0004 58- 109250.0118 58- 111199.0000 58- 150020.0011 58- 101553.0027 58- 102992.0008 58- 106549.0011 58- 109250.0121 58- 111744.0001 58- 150020.0012 58- 101553.0028 58- 102992.0009 58- 106549.0012 58- 109250.0122 58- 111747.0001 58- 150024.0002 58- 101553.0029 58- 103026.0006 58- 106549.0013 58- 109250.0123 58- 111774.0004 58- 150024.0003 58- 101553.0030 58- 103026.0007 58- 106549.0015 58- 109250.0124 58- 111839.0006 58- 150024.0004 58- 101553.0031 58- 103034.0003 58- 106549.0016 58- 109250.0125 58- 111863.0004 58- 150030.0005 58- 101553.0032 58- 103178.0015 58- 106549.0017 58- 109250.0129 58- 111863.0005 58- 150030.0007 58- 101553.0033 58- 103178.0016 58- 107287.0000 58- 109250.0130 58- 111941.0008 58- 150030.0009 58- 101553.0035 58- 103178.0017 58- 107288.0000 58- 109250.0140 58- 111949.0005 58- 150030.0010 58- 101553.0036 58- 103178.0018 58- 107289.0000 58- 109250.0141 58- 112095.0006 58- 150035.0004 58- 101553.0037 58- 103239.0008 58- 107290.0000 58- 109250.0142 58- 112095.0007 58- 150047.0001 58- 101553.0038 58- 103239.0009 58- 107292.0002 58- 109250.0143 58- 112095.0008 58- 150047.0002 58- 101601.0010 58- 103239.0012 58- 107292.0003 58- 109250.0145 58- 112699.0003 58- 150047.0010 58- 101601.0012 58- 103239.0013 58- 107292.0004 58- 109250.0146 58- 112699.0006 58- 150047.0011 58- 101601.0013 58- 103240.0009 58- 107293.0001 58- 109250.0148 58- 112699.0007 58- 150047.0013 58- 101601.0014 58- 103616.0011 58- 107294.0000 58- 109250.0149 58- 112700.0008 58- 150047.0016 58- 101666.0016 58- 103616.0012 58- 107295.0000 58- 109250.0150 58- 112700.0009 58- 150047.0017 58- 101666.0017 58- 103616.0015 58- 107296.0001 58- 109250.0151 58- 112700.0010 58- 150047.0018 58- 101666.0018 58- 103616.0016 58- 107297.0000 58- 109251.0007 58- 112700.0011 58- 150066.0003 58- 101666.0019 58- 103655.0005 58- 107298.0000 58- 109251.0008 58- 112700.0012 58- 150079.0017 58- 101962.0009 58- 103655.0008 58- 107299.0000 58- 109251.0012 58- 112700.0013 58- 150079.0018 58- 101962.0018 58- 103655.0009 58- 107300.0000 58- 109251.0017 58- 112701.0004 58- 150079.0019 58- 102219.0000 58- 103655.0010 58- 107301.0000 58- 109251.0021 58- 112701.0005 58- 150079.0020 58- 102320.0005 58- 103655.0018 58- 107302.0000 58- 109251.0022 58- 112701.0006 58- 150080.0001 58- 102320.0006 58- 103655.0019 58- 107303.0001 58- 109252.0000 58- 112701.0007 58- 150080.0002

K:\MSIDD\1. ADMIN\Grant Applications\Attachment C - List of IGFR Numbers67 Page 2 of 3 IGFR Number IGFR Number IGFR Number IGFR Number IGFR Number IGFR Number 58- 102327.0001 58- 103655.0020 58- 107303.0002 58- 109254.0004 58- 112721.0004 58- 150080.0003 58- 102329.0002 58- 103655.0021 58- 107306.0000 58- 109254.0008 58- 112721.0006 58- 150110.0002 58- 102333.0015 58- 103655.0029 58- 107307.0001 58- 109254.0010 58- 112764.0007 58- 102333.0017 58- 103655.0031 58- 107307.0002 58- 109254.0016 58- 112765.0008 58- 102333.0018 58- 103655.0033 58- 107308.0000 58- 109254.0017 58- 113076.0003 58- 102333.0018 58- 103655.0034 58- 107309.0000 58- 109254.0020 58- 113076.0004 58- 102333.0020 58- 103655.0035 58- 107310.0000 58- 109254.0021 58- 113181.0010

K:\MSIDD\1. ADMIN\Grant Applications\Attachment C - List of IGFR Numbers68 Page 3 of 3 State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Review Form

69 70 STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE Review Form

In accordance with the State Historic Preservation Act (SHPO), A.R.S. 41-861 et seq, effective July 24, 1982, each State agency must consider the potential of activities or projects to impact significant cultural resources. Also, each State agency is required to consult with the State Historic Preservation Officer with regard to those activities or projects that may impact cultural resources. Therefore, it is understood that recipients of state funds are required to comply with this law throughout the project period. All projects that affect the ground-surface that are funded by AWPF require SHPO clearance, including those on private and federal lands.

The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) must review each grant application recommended for funding in order to determine the effect, if any, a proposed project may have on archaeological or cultural resources. To assist the SHPO in this review, the following information MUST be submitted with each application for funding assistance:

• A completed copy of this form, and • A United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute map • A copy of the cultural resources survey report if a survey of the property has been conducted, and • A copy of any comments of the land managing agency/landowner (i.e., state, federal, county, municipal) on potential impacts of the project on historic properties. NOTE: If a federal agency is involved, the agency must consult with SHPO pursuant to the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA); a state agency must consult with SHPO pursuant to the State Historic Preservation Act (SHPA), OR • A copy of SHPO comments if the survey report has already been reviewed by SHPO.

Please answer the following questions:

1. Grant Program: ADWR Groundwater Conservation Grant

2. Project Title: Pumping Efficiency Project - Infrastructure Modernization and SCADA Upgrades

3. Applicant Name and Address: Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation and Drainage District 41630 W. Louis Johnson Dr., Maricopa, AZ 85138-5402 4. Current Landowner/Manager(s): Tony Solano, Director of Water Operations

5. Project Location, including Township, Range, Section: Center of the District is located approx. 30 mi south of Phx and 12 mi northwest of Casa Grande 6. Total Project Area in Acres (or total miles if trail): Various areas throughout the District, approx. 100,000 ac 7. Does the proposed project have the potential to disturb the surface and/or subsurface of the ground? YES NO 8. Please provide a brief description of the proposed project and specifically identify any surface or subsurface impacts that are expected: The project is to update the District's existing SCADA system, replacememt of flow meters on 51 turnouts in various locations of the District, replacement of 38 flow measurement meters for well pumps on various locations of the District, 27 flow measurement probes, and design work. The District is confident that everything has been cleared within the District’s federal easements. If needed, we will work with US BOR to provide additional information regarding original consultation.

71 72 STATE OF ARIZONA HISTORIC PROPERTY INVENTORY FORM

Please type or print clearly. Fill out each applicable space accurately and with as much information as is known about the property. – Not Applicable for MSIDD Project within the cleared federal system easements.

PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION For properties identified through survey: Site No. Survey Area:

Historic Names (enter the name(s), if any that best reflect the property’s historic importance):

Address:

City or Town: Vicinity County: Tax Parcel No.:

Township: Range: Section: Quarters: Acreage:

Block: Lot(s): Plat (Addition): Year of plat (addition):

UTM Reference – Zone: Easting: Northing:

USGS 7.5’ quadrangle map:

ARCHITECT: not determined known Source:

BUILDER: not determined known Source:

CONSTRUCTION DATE: known estimated Source:

STRUCTURAL CONDITION Good (well maintained; no serious problems apparent) Fair (some problems apparent) Describe: Poor (major problems; imminent threat) Describe: Ruin/Uninhabitable

USES/FUNCTIONS Describe how the property has been used over time, Attach a recent photograph of property in this space. beginning with the original use: Additional photographs may be appended.

Sources:

PHOTO INFORMATION Date of photo: View Direction (looking towards):

SIGNIFICANCE

73 To be eligible for the National Register, a property must represent an important part of the history or architecture of an area. The significance of a property is evaluated within its historic context, which are those patterns, themes, or trends in history by which a property occurred or gained importance. Describe the historic and architectural contexts of the property that may make it worthy of preservation.

A. HISTORIC EVENTS/TRENDS – Describe any historic events/trends associated with the property:

B. PERSONS – List and describe persons with an important association with the building:

C. ARCHITECTURE – Style: no style

Stories: Basement Roof Form:

Describe other character-defining features of its massing, size and scale:

INTEGRITY To be eligible for the National Register, a property must have integrity (i.e. it must be able to visually convey its importance). The outline below lists some important aspects of integrity. Fill in the blanks with as detailed a description of the property as possible.

Location - Original Site Moved: Date: Original Site:

DESIGN Describe alterations from the original design, including dates:

MATERIALS Describe the materials used in the following elements of the property:

Walls (structure):

Walls (sheathing):

Windows:

Roof:

Foundation:

SETTING Describe the natural and/or built environment around the property:

How has the environment changed since the property was constructed?

WORKMANSHIP Describe the distinctive elements, if any, of craftsmanship or method of construction:

NATIONAL REGISTER STATUS (if listed, check the appropriate box) Individually Listed; Contributor; Non-contributor to Historic District

Date Listed: Determined eligible by Keeper of National Register (date: )

74 RECOMMENDATIONS ON NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBILITY (opinion of SHPO staff or survey consultant)

Property is is not eligible individually.

Property is is not eligible as a contributor to a listed or potential historic district.

More information needed to evaluate.

If not considered eligible, state reason:

75 Application Checklist

76 ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES WMAP Groundwater Conservation Grant Application Checklist

Project Proposal Cover Letter Executive Summary Project Overview Scope of Work Budget Breakdown & Narrative Additional Contribution Breakdown (if applicable) Project Map Supplemental Information Evidence of physical and legal availability of water Evidence of Control and Tenure of Land State Historic Preservation Office Review Form