DOCSLIB.ORG

The Way of Peace Between India and Pakistan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Way of Peace Between India and Pakistan Vol.10(3), pp. 19-24, July-December 2019 DOI: 10.5897/IJPDS2019.0360 Article Number: 698862A62682 ISSN 2141–6621 Copyright © 2019 International Journal of Peace and Development Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/IJPDS Studies Review Trust relationship: The way of peace between India and Pakistan Anindya Sinha A/179, Central Road, H.B. Town, P.O. Sodepur, North 24 Pgs, Kolkata – 700110, West Bengal, India. Received 18 October, 2019; Accepted 30 December, 2019 This article investigates the root cause of conflict between India and Pakistan and ways to mitigate it. Following ‘Trust Relationship’ theory, both countries can send a number of their citizens to the neighbour country for some useful purposes. But as they come to the other country as a part of Trust Relationship pact, they need not to be harassed by long process of Passport and Visa processing, instead they can identify themselves by an identity card issued by their own country. Their background check would be done by their own country and will not get harassed unnecessarily by the long verification process by the other country. If the two governments trust each other, they will accept the people from other country who are sent by the government bodies of the neighbour country only. If this pact is signed and succeeded, as a direct impact of this, both countries can open some Trust Corridors like ‘Kartarpur Corridor’ through which they can send their citizens to the other country. Key words: Trust relationship, trust corridor, Kartarpur Corridor, belt, road. INTRODUCTION Ever since the partition of the Indian sub-continent more hostility between the two countries could spark a major than 60 years ago as the British dismantled their Indian conflagration in the region and beyond. Many analysts empire, India and Pakistan have been arch rivals and believe that the animosity between the two nuclear- tense neighbours Their animosities have roots in religion capable powers is preventing the region from realizing its and history, and have recently escalated to a dangerous full potential (https://news.bbc.co.uk › south_asia). arms race. Since gaining independence from Britain in In order to find the way of resolution, passport and visa 1947, India and Pakistan have gone to war three times free travel through „Trust Corridors‟ from each country to (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_of_India). There the other country can be taken as pact and as a footstep was also a threat of war again in December 2001, after a through the simple theory of „Trust Relationship‟, which terrorist attack on the Indian Parliament and also after the can open the door of peace movement surely and firmly if terrorist attack on 2008 by Pakistani militants in Mumbai materialized as this will create people to people city. Despite attempts to establish a regular dialogue and exchange, culture exchange and economical uplift resolve outstanding issues, relations remain tense. There through smooth export and import causing win-win is increasing international concern that the continuing situation for both countries. E-mail: [email protected]. Author(s) agree that this article remain permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License 20 Int. J. Peace and Dev. Stud. A BRIEF HISTORY OF CONFLICT RELATIONSHIP then India has constantly maintained that Pakistan has BETWEEN INDIA AND PAKISTAN been training and supplying weapons to militant separatists while Pakistan insists it only offers them moral When India gained its independence from Britain on 15th support. However, proofs establish the fact that Kashmiri August 1947, the Asian sub-continent was partitioned into extremists were cherished by Pakistan and in Pakistan Hindu-dominated India and the newly created Muslim (https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › India–Pakistan_relations). country of Pakistan. But with partition came massive rioting and population flows as Muslims and Hindus found themselves on the PEACE ATTEMPTS wrong sides of the newly-drawn border. Around fifty thousand people died in extensive violence and In spite of three major wars and numerous armed communal rioting. The death toll was highest in Punjab, conflicts as well as military standoffs, there have been which was split in two. Part of it became an Indian state several attempts to improve the relationship like Shimla and part of it became a Pakistani province. India summit, Agra summit and Lahore summit. There were emerged as a secular nation with a Hindu majority some confidence building measures by both countries. population but with a large Muslim people, while Pakistan For example, 2003 ceasefire agreement and the Delhi- emerged also as a secular nation with Muslim majority Lahore bus service inaugurated by Indian Prime Minister and later becoming an Islamic republic. Atal Bihari Vajpayee and his counterpart Parvez The most problematic region was largely Muslim Musharaff. However, 2001 India Parliament attack, the Kashmir. The Pakistanis argue that Kashmir should have 2007 Samjhauta Express bombings and recent Pulwama become part of Pakistan in 1947 because the majority of and Balakot incidents and Indian surgical strikes were its population are Muslims as British divided India and responsible for sustaining tensions between both Pakistan on the basis of religion. They say that numerous countries. During the tenure of Indian PM Narendra Modi United Nations resolutions mean that Kashmiris should and Pakistani PM Nawaz Shariff, bilateral discussions be allowed to vote in a plebiscite to decide between India again stalled after the 2016 Pathankot attack. Further, the or Pakistan. attack on an Indian military base in Indian administered The instrument of accession is a legal document Kashmir sparked a military confrontation across the Line executed by Maharaja Hari Singh, ruler of the princely of Control (LOC) with an escalation of tension and state of Jammu and Kashmir, on 26 October 1947. By ceasefire violation by both sides and further militant executing this document under the provisions of attack on Indian security forces. the Indian Independence Act 1947, Maharaja Hari Singh During the turmoil in Kashmir and during attacks and agreed to accede to the Dominion of India. Kashmir‟s counter attacks, Indian military troops killed Hizbul special status within the Indian constitution was commander Burhan Wani (who was also a resident of confirmed in 1950, allowing it more autonomy than other Indian Kashmir) resulted to mass agitation by Kashmiri Indian states. Under the Indian constitution, Jammu and people. Pakistan‟s Imran Khan elected as PM of Pakistan Kashmir is a state, and went to the poll as a state. Delhi following general election there on 2018 and offered says that both countries will "settle their differences by dialogue with India, but India turned down the proposal of peaceful means through bilateral negotiations". India has, peace talks saying that terrorism and peace talks cannot many a times, maintained that Kashmir dispute is a be done simultaneously. bilateral issue and must be settled through bilateral Recently, India's BJP government abolished Article 370 negotiations as per Simla Agreement, 1972 and thus, had from Kashmir which previously provided Kashmir a high denied any third party intervention even that of United degree of autonomy status and made Kasmir a union Nations. territory. This decision of India draws agitation of India and Pakistan have thrice gone to war over the Kashmiris and a new matter of conflict between India and territory, in 1947, 1965 and 1971. In 1971, India and Pakistan and resulted conflict of the two neighbour Pakistan fought again over Bangladeshi independence, countries at every international forum and during this time there was also some conflict (https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Indo- between the two sides in Kashmir. Pakistani_wars_and_conflicts). And in the summer of 1999, the two countries came to brink of another war after Pakistani-backed forces infiltrated Indian-controlled Kashmir. A bitter two-month THE NUCLEAR RACE conflict along the line of control only ended when Pakistani forces withdrew. India first began building its own nuclear weapons in the Presently, roughly one third of the Western part of mid-1960s, after China began nuclear tests. In 1974, Kashmir is administered by Pakistan. Most of the India conducted its first nuclear test-the so called “Smiling remainder is under Indian control. The insurgency in Buddha” in the Rajasthan desert. Indian-administered Kashmir began around 1989. Since A few years later, Pakistan began to develop its own Sinha 21 programme of Nuclear weapons. Both countries were (6) On 5th August 2019, Indian Home Minister Amit Shah also developing and testing both short-range and announced abolition of article 370 from Kashmir and intermediate-range missiles. withdrew its special status as a state. This sparked a In April 1998, Pakistan finally tested its new Ghauri major point of conflict between India and Pakistan as intermediate-range nuclear missile, named after a 12th Pakistan mentioned to extend their moral support to century Muslim warrior who conquered part of India. This Kashmir. test is thought to have prompted India‟s nuclear tests the (7) Other than the mentioned major events, firing and following month. killing of soldiers of both India and Pakistan by both sides On May 11 1998, India announced it had conducted seems to be a daily news at India-Pakistan border of three underground tests at Pokhran in the northern state Kashmir (https://www.aljazeera.com › of Rajasthan. Two days later it announced that another kashmirtheforgottenconflict › 2011/06). two explosions had taken place. India‟s actions were widely condemned by the international community and Pakistan was urged not to retaliate. But on May 28, TRUST RELATIONSHIP: HOW IT CAN WORK Pakistan announced that it had conducted five nuclear BETWEEN INDIA AND PAKISTAN OR ANY OTHER tests of its own in south-western Baluchistan.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Responsible for Deaths of Involvement in Major Terrorist Attacks Designation Hafiz Mohammed Saeed, Amir, Lashkar-E-Taiba And
    Responsible Involvement in major terrorist Designation for deaths of attacks . January 1998 Wandhama . Declared as terrorist by India under massacre (23) the amended Unlawful Activities . March 2000 Chittisinghpura (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in Hafiz Mohammed 625 people massacre (35) September 2019; Saeed, Amir, . December 2000 Red Fort attack . Designated as a global terrorist by Lashkar-e-Taiba (3) the UN in December 2008; and Jamaat-ud- . May 2002 Kaluchak massacre . Designated by the US Treasury in Daawa (31) May 2008; . March 2003 Nandimarg . Carries reward up to $10 million massacre (24) from the US Government. Zaki-ur-Rahman . October 2005 Delhi Diwali blasts . Declared as terrorist by India under Lakhvi, (62) the amended UAPA in September Operational . March 2006 Varanasi blasts (28) 2019; Commander, . April 2006 Doda massacre (34) . Designated as a global terrorist by Lashkar-e-Taiba . July 2006 Mumbai train blasts the UN in December 2008; (211) . Designated by the US Treasury in . January 2008 Rampur CRPF May 2008. camp attack (8) . November 2008 Mumbai attack (166) Masood Azhar, 125 people . October 2001 Srinagar Assembly . Declared as terrorist under the Amir, Jaish-e- attack (38) December 2001 amended UAPA in September 2019; Mohammed Parliament attack (9) . Designated by the UN as a global . January 2016 Pathankot attack terrorist in May 2019; (7) . Designated by the US Treasury in . September 2016 Uri attack (19) November 2010. October 2017 Humhama BSF camp attack (1) . December 2017 Lethpora CRPF camp attack (4) . February 2018 Sunjawan attack (7) . February 2019 Lethpora suicide attack (40) Dawood Ibrahim 257 people March 1993 Mumbai serial blasts .
    [Show full text]
  • Kartarpur Corridor November 2019 | Edition 1
    NOVEMBER 2019 | EDITION 1 ECONOMIC SOCIAL POLICY REGIONAL GOVERNANCE POLICY INTEGRATION KARTARPUR CORRIDOR (written by Amisha) Kartarpur marks the most significant and constructive phase in the life of Guru Nanak Dev JI. The name Kartarpur means “Place of God”. During the 1947 partition of India the region got divided across India and Pakistan. The Radcliff line awarded the shakargarh tehsil on the right bank of the river including Kartarpur to Pakistan and the Gurdaspur tehsil on the left bank of Ravi to India. The wait is now over, pilgrims who used to stand on platforms with folded hands and binoculars to catch a clear view of the holy Kartarpur Gurudwara can literally now cross the border and visit the shrine. This is the first time since partition in 1947 that the border between the two Punjabis, apart from the crossing at wagah-Attari, is being breached in peacetime. NOVEMBER 1, 2019 CPRG NEWSLETTER EDITION 1 The India and Pakistan open Kartarpur corridor on the occasion of Guru Nanak Dev ji’s Parkash Purab. This has fulfilled long waited wish of more than 6 million Sikhs. This corridor has been designed to facilitate easy access for the pilgrims visiting the shrine. It includes hotels, commercial areas, apartments, parking lots, border facility area, power grid station and an information center. A bridge over the Ravi connects the Indian side at Dera, Baba Nanak with kartarpur on Pakistani side. The Indians visiting the shrine wouldn’t require any visa but their passport and would undergo some security and obtain special permission. On a daily basis 5000 pilgrims can register and get a chance to visit their holy place.
    [Show full text]
  • Pashaura Singh Chair Professor and Saini Chair in Sikh Studies Department of Religious Studies 2026 CHASS INTN Building 900 University Avenue Riverside, CA 92521
    Pashaura Singh Chair Professor and Saini Chair in Sikh Studies Department of Religious Studies 2026 CHASS INTN Building 900 University Avenue Riverside, CA 92521 6th Dr. Jasbir Singh Saini Endowed Chair in Sikh and Punjabi Studies Conference (May 3-4, 2019) Celebrating Guru Nanak: New Perspectives, Reassessments and Revivification ABSTRACTS 1. “No-Man’s-Land: Fluidity between Sikhism and Islam in Partition Literature and Film” Dr. Sara Grewal, Assistant Professor, Department of English Faculty of Arts & Science MacEwan University Room 6-292 10700 – 104 Ave NW Edmonton, AB T5J 4S2 Canada While the logic of (religious) nationalism operative during Partition resulted in horrific, widespread violence, many of the aesthetic responses to Partition have focused on the linkages between religious communities that predated Partition, and in many cases, even continued on after the fact. Indeed, Sikhism and Islam continue to be recognized by many artists as mutually imbricated traditions in the Indian Subcontinent—a tradition cultivated from Mardana’s discipleship with Guru Nanak to the present day—despite the communalism that has prevailed since the colonial interventions of the nineteenth century. By focusing on the fluidity of religious and national identity, artistic works featuring Sikh and Muslim characters in 1947 highlight the madness of Partition violence in a society previously characterized by interwoven religious traditions and practices, as well as the fundamentally violent, exclusionary logic that undergirds nationalism. In my paper, I will focus particularly on two texts that explore these themes: Saadat Hasan Manto’s short story Phone 951-827-1251 Fax 951-827-3324 “Toba Tek Singh” and Sabiha Sumar’s Khamosh Pani.
    [Show full text]
  • TERRORISM HAS BECOME EXTENSIVE in INDIA Asim K
    Volume 1. No. 1 page 50-54 TERRORISM HAS BECOME EXTENSIVE IN INDIA Asim K. Karmakar1 Abstract Terrorism is, in the broadest sense, the use of intentionally indiscriminate violence as a means to create terror, or fear, to achieve a political, religious or ideological aim. The impact of terrorism in maintaining law and order, in assuring peace and tranquillity to law-abiding citizenry and in harnessing growth and development, both at the national and international level, is quite grave, gloomy and alarming. In is in this context the paper first of all gives workable definition of terrorism, international law against terrorism to minimize the impact of terrorism, the scale and magnitude of global terrorism and India’s hard wrestling with the terrorism Keywords: Global terrorism; International law; major terrorist activities; Al-Qaida attacks, Cross-border terrorism Received on August05, 2018; Revision received: November 26, 2018, Accepted: December 15, 2018 Introduction Terrorism is, in the broadest sense, the use of intentionally indiscriminate violence as a means to create terror, or fear, to achieve a political, religious or ideological aim (Fortna, 2015). A mini definition of terrorism as provided by the United Nations runs thus: “Any other act intended to cause death or serious bodily injury to a civilian, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities in a situation of an armed conflict, when the purpose of such act, by its nature and context is to intimidate a population, or to compel a government or an international organization to do or abstain from doing any act” But this mini-definition serves only the purpose of convention.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kartarpur Pilgrimage Corridor: Negotiating the ‘Line of Mutual Hatred’
    International Journal of Religious Tourism and Pilgrimage Volume 9 Issue 2 Sacred Journeys 7: Pilgrimage and Article 5 Beyond: Going Places, Far and Away 2021 The Kartarpur Pilgrimage Corridor: Negotiating the ‘Line of Mutual Hatred’ Anna V. Bochkovskaya Lomonosov Moscow State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://arrow.tudublin.ie/ijrtp Part of the Tourism and Travel Commons Recommended Citation Bochkovskaya, Anna V. (2021) "The Kartarpur Pilgrimage Corridor: Negotiating the ‘Line of Mutual Hatred’," International Journal of Religious Tourism and Pilgrimage: Vol. 9: Iss. 2, Article 5. doi:https://doi.org/10.21427/2qad-kw05 Available at: https://arrow.tudublin.ie/ijrtp/vol9/iss2/5 Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License. © International Journal of Religious Tourism and Pilgrimage ISSN : 2009-7379 Available at: http://arrow.tudublin.ie/ijrtp/ Volume 9(ii) 2021 The Kartarpur Pilgrimage Corridor: Negotiating the ‘Line of Mutual Hatred’ Anna Bochkovskaya Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia [email protected] After the partition of British India in 1947, many pilgrimage sites important for the Sikhs – followers of a medieval poet-mystic and philosopher Guru Nanak (1469-1539) – turned out to be at different sides of the Indian-Pakistani border. The towns of Nankana Sahib and Kartarpur (Guru Nanak’s birthplace, and residence for the last 18 years of his life, respectively) remained within Pakistani territory. Gurdwaras located there represent utmost pilgrimage destinations, the Sikhs’ ‘Mecca and Medina’. Owing to Indian-Pakistani relations that have deteriorated throughout seven decades, pilgrimage to Kartarpur has been extremely difficult for India’s citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan 2019 International Religious Freedom Report
    PAKISTAN 2019 INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT Executive Summary The constitution establishes Islam as the state religion and requires all provisions of the law to be consistent with Islam. The constitution states, “Subject to law, public order, and morality, every citizen shall have the right to profess, practice, and propagate his religion.” It also states, “A person of the Qadiani group or the Lahori group (who call themselves Ahmadis), is a non-Muslim.” The courts continued to enforce blasphemy laws, punishment for which ranges from life in prison to execution for a range of charges, including “defiling the Prophet Muhammad.” According to civil society reports, there were at least 84 individuals imprisoned on blasphemy charges, at least 29 of whom had received death sentences, as compared with 77 and 28, respectively, in 2018. The government has never executed anyone specifically for blasphemy. According to data provided by nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), police registered new blasphemy cases against at least 10 individuals. Christian advocacy organizations and media outlets stated that four Christians were tortured or mistreated by police in August and September, resulting in the death of one of them. On January 29, the Supreme Court upheld its 2018 judgment overturning the conviction of Asia Bibi, a Christian woman sentenced to death for blasphemy in 2010. Bibi left the country on May 7, after death threats made it unsafe for her to remain. On September 25, the Supreme Court overturned the conviction of a man who had spent 18 years in prison for blasphemy. On December 21, a Multan court sentenced English literature lecturer Junaid Hafeez to death for insulting the Prophet Muhammad after he had spent nearly seven years awaiting trial and verdict.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Issues & Current Affairs February 2019
    UPSC Contemporary Issues & Current Affairs February 2019 By Jawwad Kazi Published by 'Unique Academy Publications Pvt. Ltd.' 1202/39, Vastu Chambers, Opp. Fergusson College Main Gate Shirole Rasta, Pune 4. Ph. 020-25530950 Email. : [email protected] Website : www.theuniqueacademy.com UPSC Contemporary Issues & Current Affairs February 2019 (Study Material) By Jawwad Kazi https://t.me/jawwadkazicurrentaffairs © Unique Aademy Publications Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. Year 2019 Cover Design : Unique Academy Publications Team Typesetter :Unique Academy Publications Team Printed By : M. S. Process, Sadashiv Peth, Pune. The Unique Academy Contemporary Issues INDEX Sr. Page No No Propriety of Judges taking up post retirement government 1 8 assignments 2 Forest Right Act 2006 10 3 Education qualification criteria for civic polls 13 4 Minimum Income Guarantee 15 5 Employment Data 18 6 USA - Taliban Talks 20 7 India-Saudi Arabia relations 24 8 Pulwama terror attack 27 9 Need for strategic security doctrine 30 10 India-South Africa relations 33 11 India and UN convention against torture 36 12 Railway Accidents in India 39 13 Banning unregulated deposit scheme ordinance 42 14 India's Looming Water Crisis: 44 15 Leprosy 47 16 National Policy on Electronics 2019 50 17 E-waste Management 52 18 E-Commerce 55 Pradhan Mantri AnnadataAaySanraksHan Abhiyan (PM- 19 58 AASHA) 20 Aspirational Districts Program 61 21 Angel Tax 63 22 e-Pharmacy status in India 65 Contemporary Issues & Current Affairs February - 2019 (Study Material) 3 The Unique Academy Current Affairs INDEX Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • Indo-Pak Relations
    Dr. Debjani Ghosal, Assistant Professor of Political Science, Surendranath College (Study Materials) Indo-Pak Relations Since their independence as new nations in 1947, India and Pakistan have followed a path of mutual animosity. Pakistan was created as a national homeland for the Muslim-majority areas of the subcontinent, while India proposed to become a secular nation that included about 85 percent Hindus, but also more than ten percent Muslims as well as large numbers of Sikhs, Christians and members of other religions. Soon after the partition of the sub-continent into the two nations, about 17 million people fled their homes and journeyed to either Pakistan or India. In one of the largest exchanges of populations in history, violence soon broke out with Muslims on one side and Sikhs and Hindus on the other. The resulting blood shed in the Punjab and West Bengal regions left more than one million people dead in its wake. In the midst of this refugee movement and open violence, the governments of India and Pakistan hastily tried to divide the assets of British India between the two new countries. From weapons and money, down to paper clips and archaeological treasures, all had to be divided.The British had left behind, besides about half of the subcontinent that it directly governed, some 562 independent or "princely" states. The provision was that each state could remain independent, join Pakistan or accede to India. A violent competition soon resulted as the two new nations sought to win to their own nations the largest and most strategically located states, such as Hyderabad and Kashmir.
    [Show full text]
  • 7Th November 2016 Dear Member, India-UK Joint Statement During
    7th November 2016 Dear Member, India-UK Joint Statement during the visit of Prime Minister of the United Kingdom to India The Prime Minister Theresa May visited India during 6-8 November 2016 at the invitation of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. This was her first bilateral visit outside Europe after taking over as the Prime Minister of the UK. The visit was designed to further strengthen the India–UK Strategic Partnership, guided by a shared vision for the future and supported by a concrete and comprehensive roadmap of bilateral and global engagement. Prime Minister Modi welcomed Prime Minister May and discussed all aspects of India-UK relations. The two leaders recalled the strong bonds of friendship that exist between the two countries characterised by extensive political engagement, deep economic cooperation, and ever expanding scientific and technological collaboration. The two states enjoy vibrant people to people relations supported by the 1.5 million strong Indian diaspora in the UK and an increasing convergence on the way forward on key global challenges of the 21st century. Our shared history, our shared connections and our shared values make this a natural partnership. They form the foundation of a unique friendship. The two Prime Ministers emphasized working together on a contemporary and forward-looking global partnership to promote peace, security and prosperity of the two countries and act as a force for good in the world. During Prime Minister Modi’s visit to the UK last year, the two countries set out a bold vision for the UK-India Strategic Partnership. Both countries today commit to turn this vision into reality through closer, practical cooperation that delivers real benefits to both the countries.
    [Show full text]
  • China and Crisis Management in South Asia
    Investigating Crises: South Asia’s Lessons, Evolving Dynamics, and Trajectories CHINA AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT IN SOUTH ASIA Yun Sun & Hannah Haegeland China’s growing role as a regional and global power may translate to greater Chinese third-party involvement in the management of future interstate crises. The nature of this involvement is uncertain, but historical trajectories of China’s approach to the subcontinent offer some insight. In South Asia, despite shared borders and historic relations with both India and Pakistan, China has played a minimal role in the actual and near-wars between its southern neighbors, instead leaving any third-party management largely in the hands of the United States and European powers. China does not yet view itself as either a military or political global superpower, and thus the incentive to adopt U.S.-style leadership in crisis management is low. Moreover, even as China rises as a global leader, it approaches third-party crisis management differently than the United States and views its interests and exposure to risks abroad through a distinct prism. Yet, as a part of China’s immediate periphery, the peace and stability of the subcontinent constitutes a key area for China’s national security — particularly after the 1998 nuclear tests by India and Pakistan. Crises between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan could have catastrophic implications for China’s critical national interests. Further, as the global geography of China’s economy expands, Beijing’s risk exposure as a third party in emerging bilateral crises increases. Historically, when India-Pakistan crises have emerged, the United States has intervened in a third-party manager role.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Ground Hog Da Din' for the Sikh Insurgency?
    Small Wars & Insurgencies ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fswi20 ‘Ground Hog Da Din’ for the Sikh insurgency? C. Christine Fair , Kerry Ashkenaze & Scott Batchelder To cite this article: C. Christine Fair , Kerry Ashkenaze & Scott Batchelder (2020): ‘Ground Hog Da Din’ for the Sikh insurgency?, Small Wars & Insurgencies, DOI: 10.1080/09592318.2020.1786920 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2020.1786920 Published online: 03 Jul 2020. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 84 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=fswi20 SMALL WARS & INSURGENCIES https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2020.1786920 ‘Ground Hog Da Din’ for the Sikh insurgency? C. Christine Fair, Kerry Ashkenaze and Scott Batchelder Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA ABSTRACT Between 1978 and 1992, Sikh militants rampaged across the northern Indian state of the Punjab demanding that a homeland for Sikhs, called Khalistan, be carved from that state. The so-called Khalistanis, with Pakistan’s extensive support, waged a brutal campaign of violence that killed tens of thousands. While Indian security forces eviscerated the various Khalistani groups by 1992, support for the movement remained strong in pockets of the global Sikh diaspora. Pakistan’s intelligence agency, the ISI, also worked to keep the move­ ment alive wherever possible. Pakistan’s efforts have paid off: in recent years, the Khalistan movement has rehabilitated itself even within India. We con­ structed a novel dataset of Khalistani terror incidents perpetrated in the last decade.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSUE BRIEF Phone: +92-920-4423, 24 Fax: +92-920-4658
    INSTITUTE OF STRATEGIC STUDIES ISLAMABAD Web: www.issi.org.pk ISSUE BRIEF Phone: +92-920-4423, 24 Fax: +92-920-4658 KARTARPUR CORRIDOR: A HOPE FOR PEACE By Shahroo Malik Research Associate & Kamran Khan, Intern Edited by Najam Rafique March 7, 2019 (Views expressed in the brief are those of the author, and do not represent those of ISSI) The Pakistan Government has announced to open the 4.7 kilometer long, visa free Kartarpur Corridor on the 550th birth anniversary of Baba Guru Nanak in November 2019. While inaugurating the project in November 2018, Prime Minister Imran Khan stated, “There have been mistakes on both sides [in the past], but we will not be able to move forward until we break the chains of the past. The past is there only to teach us, not for us to live in.”1 Every year thousands of Sikh devotees come from India to Kartarpur to celebrate Baba Guru Nanak’s birth anniversary. Kartarpur is located in Narowal district of Pakistan’s Punjab province. About three kilometers away from the border with India, Kartarpur Sahib Gurdwara is located on the banks of River Ravi in Pakistan and is the site where founder of Sikhism, Baba Guru Nanak spent his life’s last 18 years before dying in 1539. Kartarpur Corridor will provide visa free access to Indian Sikh pilgrims to visit Gurdwara Kartarpur Sahib (the final resting place of Baba Guru Nanak) in Pakistan. Since 1947 when India and Pakistan gained independence from Britain, this is the first time that Indian Sikh pilgrims would be able to travel to Pakistan without a visa.
    [Show full text]