DOCSLIB.ORG

22 3 267 306 Tanasevitch for Inet.P65

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
22 3 267 306 Tanasevitch for Inet.P65 Arthropoda Selecta 22(3): 267306 © ARTHROPODA SELECTA, 2013 The linyphiid spiders of the Altais, southern Siberia (Aranei: Linyphiidae) Ïàóêè-ëèíèôèèäû Àëòàÿ (Aranei: Linyphiidae) A.V. Tanasevitch À.Â. Òàíàñåâè÷ Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky prospect, 33, Moscow 119071, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Èíñòèòóò ïðîáëåì ýêîëîãèè è ýâîëþöèè ÐÀÍ, Ëåíèíñêèé ïðîñïåêò, 33, Ìîñêâà 119071, Ðîññèÿ. KEY WORDS: Spiders, southern Siberia, Altai, taxonomy, faunistics, new species, distribution. ÊËÞ×ÅÂÛÅ ÑËÎÂÀ: Ïàóêè, Þæíàÿ Ñèáèðü, Àëòàé, òàêñîíîìèÿ, ôàóíèñòèêà, íîâûå âèäû, ðàñïðîñò- ðàíåíèå. ABSTRACT. New data on linyphiid spiders from 1996. C ó÷åòîì íîâûõ äàííûõ ôàóíà ëèíèôèèä ðå- the Altais are presented: 52 species are recorded in ãèîíà íàñ÷èòûâàåò íå ìåíåå 210 âèäîâ, èìååò ÿâ- the area for the first time, including four described íûé ïåðåõîäíûé õàðàêòåð ìåæäó åâðîïåéñêîé è as new: Halorates altaicus sp.n., Hilaira meridiona- þæíîñèáèðñêîé ôàóíàìè, õàðàêòåðèçóåòñÿ âûñîêèì lis sp.n., Incestophantes brevilamellus sp.n. and ïðîöåíòîì øèðîêîàðåàëüíûõ âèäîâ (58.1%), íåâû- Mecynargus minutus sp.n. An unknown female of ñîêîé äîëåé ñèáèðñêèõ ýëåìåíòîâ (23.8%), à òàêæå Anguliphantes sibiricus (Tanasevitch, 1996) and the îòñóòñòâèåì ìíîãèõ òèïè÷íûõ «ñèáèðÿêîâ» è þæ- males of Mughiphantes sobrioides Tanasevitch, 2000 íîñèáèðñêèõ âèäîâ. Ïðèâåäåí ïîëíûé ñïèñîê ïàó- and Walckenaeria katanda Marusik, Hippa et Ko- êîâ-ëèíèôèèä Àëòàÿ è èõ ðàñïðåäåëåíèå ïî âûñîò- ponen, 1996 are described for the first time. Based íûì ïîÿñàì. Øèðîêîàðåàëüíûå âèäû ëó÷øå îñâàè- on the new data, the linyphiid fauna of the Altais âàþò âåñü âåðòèêàëüíûé ïðîôèëü è äîìèíèðóþò âî currently contains 210 species, obviously being tran- âñåõ âûñîòíûõ ïîÿñàõ, ñóùåñòâåííî ïðåîáëàäàÿ (â sitional in character between the European and South 4 ðàçà) â íèâàëüíîé çîíå. Âåðîÿòíûå ýíäåìèêè Siberian faunas. It is dominated by widespread spe- (3.8%) ÿâíî ñèáèðñêîãî ãåíåçèñà, îáèòàþò (çà åäèí- cies (58.1%), the proportion of Siberian elements ñòâåííûì èñêëþ÷åíèåì) â âûñîêîãîðüÿõ. Àðêòî- being low (23.8 %), while many typical Siberians àëüïèéöû íàéäåíû èñêëþ÷èòåëüíî â âûñîêîãîðüÿõ and South Siberian species absent. A checklist of the è ïîäíèìàþòñÿ âïëîòü äî ìàêñèìàëüíûõ (èçó÷åí- Altai linyphiids and their vertical distribution are íûõ) âûñîò (3100 ì). Scotinotylus eutypus (Cham- given. The widespread species dominate in all altitu- berlin, 1948) â ñìûñëå Saito & Yasuda [1988], îòìå- dinal belts, essentially prevailing (4 times) in the ÷åííûé â ßïîíèè, âåðîÿòíåå âñåãî ÿâëÿåòñÿ àëü- nival zone. Presumed endemics (3.8 %) are obvious- ïèéñêî-àëòàéñêèì S. antennatus (O. Pickard- ly of Siberian origins and live (with one exception) Cambridge, 1875). in highlands. Arcto-alpine elements occur exclusive- ly at high altitudes and all of them reach the maxi- Introduction mum elevations explored (3100 m a.s.l.). Scotinoty- lus eutypus (Chamberlin, 1948) in the sense of Saito The Altais, altyn meaning gold in Turkic lan- & Yasuda [1988], recorded from Japan, most likely guages, is accepted here, according to Gvozdetsky, belongs to the Alps-Altai S. antennatus (O. Pickard- Mikhailov [1987], as the westernmost mountain prov- Cambridge, 1875). ince of the South Siberian Mountain system. The Altais extend over the territory of Russia, Kazakhstan, China ÐÅÇÞÌÅ. Ïðèâåäåíû íîâûå ñâåäåíèÿ ïî ïàó- and Mongolia, the latter two parts being termed the êàì-ëèíèôèèäàì Àëòàÿ: 52 âèäà âïåðâûå îòìå÷åíû Mongolian Altais. This paper deals with the Russian â ðåãèîíå, èç íèõ 4 âèäà îïèñàíû êàê íîâûå äëÿ and Kazakhstan territories of the Altais, concluded by íàóêè: Halorates altaicus sp.n., Hilaira meridionalis a few words about the Mongolian Altais. sp.n., Incestophantes brevilamellus sp.n. è Mecynargus The Altai territory is considered here in a little minutus sp.n. Âïåðâûå îïèñàíà ñàìêà Anguliphantes more restricted sense than by some authors. Thus, spe- sibiricus (Tanasevitch, 1996), à òàêæå íåèçâåñòíûå cies recorded from the localities like Kosikha, Talmen- ñàìöû Mughiphantes sobrioides Tanasevitch, 2000 è ka [Eskov, 1992] or Akutikha [Marusik et al., 1996] Walckenaeria katanda Marusik, Hippa et Koponen, are omitted from the Altai list. 268 A.V. Tanasevitch Since the publication of the first larger paper on Notioscopus jamalensis Grese, 1909 [Marusik et the spiders of the Altais [Marusik et al., 1996], the al., 1996; Levina, Mikhailov, 2004] = Notioscopus Altai list which contained 95 linyphiids has been en- sibiricus Tanasevitch, 2007 riched by 65 species, 11 of which described directly Oreoneta uralensis Saaristo et Marusik, 2004 from this mountain country [Azarkina, Trilikauskas, [Saaristo, Marusik, 2004] = Oreoneta eskovi Saaristo 2013; Ermolajev, 1937; Fomichev, Marusik, 2011; et Marusik, 2004 Hippa, Oksala, 1985; Levina, Mikhailov, 2004; Panamomops mengei Simon, 1926 [Marusik et al., Marusik, Logunov, 2009; Tanasevitch, 2000a, b, 1996] = Panamomops tauricornis (Simon, 1881) 2005a, 2007, 2008, 2010, 2011b, 2012, 2013; Ta- Porrhomma montanum Jackson, 1913 [Marusik et nasevitch et al., 2012; Trilikauskas, 2012; Volynkin al., 1996; Levina, Mikhailov, 2004] = Porrhomma pyg- et al., 2011]. The information contained in Savelyeva maeum (Blackwall, 1834) [1970, 1976, 1979] on the spiders from East Kaza- Saloca diceros (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871) [Lev- khstan lacks specific localities and is thus mostly ina, Mikhailov, 2004] = Horcotes strandi (Sytschev- omitted. Only Savelyevas records found and checked skaya, 1935) in the collections have been considered. The species Thyreosthenius biovatus (O. Pickard-Cambridge, referred to by Volkovskij [2006] and Volkovskij, Ro- 1875) [Marusik et al., 1996; Levina, Mikhailov, 2004] manenko [2005a, b, c; 2010] for the Altais have been = Thyreosthenius parasiticus (Westring, 1851) omitted as well, because they seem to be dubious and Trichopterna mengei (Simon, 1884) [Levina, requiring confirmation. Mikhailov, 2004] = Pelecopsis palmgreni Marusik et The new data in this paper add another 52 linyphiid Esyunin, 1998 species to the Altai list. Four of them are described as new: Halorates altaicus sp.n., Hilaira meridionalis Material and methods sp.n., Incestophantes brevilamellus sp.n. and Mecy- nargus minutus sp.n. Besides the spider material collected by Sergei Golo- The paper first lists the most interesting records. vatch and Andrei Tanasevitch (Moscow) from the Al- Some of them are supplied with figures of the genitalia. tais in 1997, this paper is also based on extensive At the end, a checklist of the Altai Linyphiidae and spider collections kindly offered for study mostly by their vertical distribution patterns are given. Galina Azarkina (Novosibirsk). Spiders were also tak- The following 16 species are eliminated from the en by Andrei & Roman Dudko, Andrei Fedotov, Na- Altai list, representing either synonyms or misidentifi- dezhda Levina, Dmitry Logunov, Oleg Lyakhov, Ilia cations. The valid names are on the right: Lyubechansky, Sergei Ovtchinnikov, Alexander Ryvkin, Synonyms: Veryaskina and Vadim Zinchenko. All available mate- Agyneta parasaxatilis Marusik, Hippa et Koponen, rial, upon which the papers Marusik et al. [1996] and 1996 = Agyneta pseudosaxatilis Tanasevitch, 1984 [Ta- Levina, Mikhailov [2004] were based, kept at the Zoo- nasevitch, 2011b] logical Museum, University of Turku, Finland (ZMT) Lepthyphantes tes Marusik, Hippa et Koponen, 1996 and the Zoological Museum, Moscow State University = Oryphantes geminus (Tanasevitch, 1982) [Ta- (ZMMU), have been re-examined. nasevitch, 2011b] Type and non-type material is shared between the Misidentifications, re-examined: collections of the ZMMU and the Institute of System- Agyneta rurestris (C.L. Koch, 1836) [Savelyeva, atics and Ecology of Animals, Novosibirsk (ISEA); 1979] = Agyneta saaristoi Tanasevitch, 2000 some more samples used here are also housed in the Agyneta similis (Kulczyñski, 1926) [Marusik et al., Muséum dhistoire naturelle, Geneva, Switzerland 1996; Levina, Mikhailov, 2004] = Agyneta saaristoi (MHNG) and in the private collection of Andrei Ta- Tanasevitch, 2000 nasevitch (CAT). Agyneta subtilis (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1863) Distribution patterns of linyphiids are mainly giv- [Savelyeva 1970 1979] = Agyneta allosubtilis Loksa, en, based on the latest publications of Tanasevitch 1965 [2005b, 2006, 2008, etc]. Bolyphantes luteolus (Blackwall, 1833) [Levina, In the descriptions, the chaetotaxy of Erigoninae Mikhailov, 2004] = Bolyphantes alticeps (Sundevall, is given in a formula (e.g., 2.2.1.1) which refers to the 1832) number of dorsal spines on tibiae IIV. For Micronet- Hilaira tatrica Kulczyñski, 1915 [Levina, inae, the chaetotaxy is presented in a different formu- Mikhailov, 2004] = Oreoneta eskovi Saaristo et la, e.g., Ti I: 2-1-1-2(1), which means that tibia I has Marusik, 2004 two dorsal spines, one pro-, one retrolateral spine, Lepthyphantes bipilis (Kulczyñski, 1885) [Levina, and two or one ventral spine (the apical spines are Mikhailov, 2004] = Oryphantes geminus (Tanasevitch, disregarded). The sequence of leg segment measure- 1982) ments is as follows: femur + patella + tibia + metatar- Minicia uralensis Tanasevitch, 1983 [Levina, sus + tarsus. All measurements are in mm. All scale Mikhailov, 2004] = Silometopus uralensis Tanasevitch, lines in the figures correspond to 0.1 mm, unless 1985 indicated otherwise. The linyphiid spiders of the Altais 269 The terminology of genitalic structures in Micro- RECORDS FROM THE ALTAIS. RUSSIA: Arty- netinae follows that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gennadiy Y. Baryshnikov, Boris N. Luzgin, Valeriy S. Imaev 1
    PRACE GEOGRAFICZNE, zeszyt 116 Instytut Geografii i Gospodarki Przestrzennej UJ Kraków 2006 Gennadiy Y. Baryshnikov, Boris N. Luzgin, Valeriy S. Imaev CATASTROPHIC EARTHQUAKES IN THE ALTAI MTS, THEIR AFTERMATH AND IMPACT ON SLOPE AND FLUVIAL PROCESSES Abstract: The paper presents a study into a catastrophic seismic event rating 9-10 on the international scale MRS-64. The event took place on 27 September 2003 in the Altai Republic of the Russian Fede- ration. Immediately after the event, the authors studied its impact on slope and fluvial processes. Key words: catastrophic earthquakes, palaeoseismogenic structure, epicentre, palsas (bugors), permafrost. 1. Introduction On 27 September 2003, the Upper Altai (Russia) near the border with Mongolia, China and Kazakhstan, experienced one of the strongest earthquakes over the previous 300 years. This catastrophic event has been rated 7.3 in force and 9-10 in intensity of tremors on the international MSR-64 scale. Aftershocks continued for several months, but with progressively reduced power An earlier earthquake of the same strength was recorded in the Great Altai Mountains on 9 December 1761 in Mongolia, when the unloading of tension at the epicentre was ro- ughly estimated at eight units and the intensity of shocks was rated 11 at degrees. This earth- quake was linked with the Palaeoseismogenic structure of Ar-Khutel on the north-eastern slopes of the Mongolian Altai Mountains (Luzgin et al. 2003). A number of researchers regard Ar-Khutel as the largest discovered palaeoseismogenic structure on Earth. The earthquake reverberated causing shocks in the towns of Ust’-Kamenogorsk and Biysk rating six degrees in intensity and at Barnaul and Semipalatynsk rating ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Works of Chokan Valikhanov Selected Works of Chokan Valikhanov
    SELECTED WORKS OF CHOKAN VALIKHANOV CHOKAN OF WORKS SELECTED SELECTED WORKS OF CHOKAN VALIKHANOV Pioneering Ethnographer and Historian of the Great Steppe When Chokan Valikhanov died of tuberculosis in 1865, aged only 29, the Russian academician Nikolai Veselovsky described his short life as ‘a meteor flashing across the field of oriental studies’. Set against his remarkable output of official reports, articles and research into the history, culture and ethnology of Central Asia, and more important, his Kazakh people, it remains an entirely appropriate accolade. Born in 1835 into a wealthy and powerful Kazakh clan, he was one of the first ‘people of the steppe’ to receive a Russian education and military training. Soon after graduating from Siberian Cadet Corps at Omsk, he was taking part in reconnaissance missions deep into regions of Central Asia that had seldom been visited by outsiders. His famous mission to Kashgar in Chinese Turkestan, which began in June 1858 and lasted for more than a year, saw him in disguise as a Tashkent mer- chant, risking his life to gather vital information not just on current events, but also on the ethnic make-up, geography, flora and fauna of this unknown region. Journeys to Kuldzha, to Issyk-Kol and to other remote and unmapped places quickly established his reputation, even though he al- ways remained inorodets – an outsider to the Russian establishment. Nonetheless, he was elected to membership of the Imperial Russian Geographical Society and spent time in St Petersburg, where he was given a private audience by the Tsar. Wherever he went he made his mark, striking up strong and lasting friendships with the likes of the great Russian explorer and geographer Pyotr Petrovich Semyonov-Tian-Shansky and the writer Fyodor Dostoyevsky.
    [Show full text]
  • Arachnida, Araneae) Inventory of Hankoniemi, Finland
    Biodiversity Data Journal 5: e21010 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.5.e21010 Data Paper Standardized spider (Arachnida, Araneae) inventory of Hankoniemi, Finland Pedro Cardoso‡,§, Lea Heikkinen |, Joel Jalkanen¶, Minna Kohonen|, Matti Leponiemi|, Laura Mattila ¶, Joni Ollonen|, Jukka-Pekka Ranki|, Anni Virolainen |, Xuan Zhou|, Timo Pajunen ‡ ‡ Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland § IUCN SSC Spider & Scorpion Specialist Group, Helsinki, Finland | Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland ¶ Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Corresponding author: Pedro Cardoso (pedro.cardoso@helsinki.fi) Academic editor: Jeremy Miller Received: 15 Sep 2017 | Accepted: 14 Dec 2017 | Published: 18 Dec 2017 Citation: Cardoso P, Heikkinen L, Jalkanen J, Kohonen M, Leponiemi M, Mattila L, Ollonen J, Ranki J, Virolainen A, Zhou X, Pajunen T (2017) Standardized spider (Arachnida, Araneae) inventory of Hankoniemi, Finland. Biodiversity Data Journal 5: e21010. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e21010 Abstract Background During a field course on spider taxonomy and ecology at the University of Helsinki, the authors had the opportunity to sample four plots with a dual objective of both teaching on field methods, spider identification and behaviour and uncovering the spider diversity patterns found in the southern coastal forests of Hankoniemi, Finland. As an ultimate goal, this field course intended to contribute to a global project that intends to uncover spider diversity patterns worldwide. With that purpose, a set of standardised methods and procedures was followed that allow the comparability of obtained data with numerous other projects being conducted across all continents. New information A total of 104 species and 1997 adults was collected.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Conservation Report by The
    REPORT ON THE CURRENT STATE OF CONSERVATION OF THE WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTIES VOLCANOES OF KAMCHATKA, GOLDEN MOUNTAINS OF ALTAI, LAKE BAIKAL, VIRGIN KOMI FORESTS, WRANGEL ISLAND IN 2015 Report On the State of Conservation of the UNESCO World Heritage Property Golden Mountains of Altai (Russian Federation, No. 768rev) SUMMARY Project works on construction of the Altai gas pipeline are not kept now. According to the legislation of the Russian Federation, without obtaining the positive conclusion of the state environmental assessment for project documentation the corresponding construction cannot be started. Project documentation on construction of the gas pipeline “Altai” did not arrive to the state environmental assessment of federal level. The order of the Russian Federation Government of August 13, 2013 No. 1416-r become invalid. The Government of Altai Republic has no plans for construction and reconstruction of linear constructions and other capital construction projects in borders of the object of the world heritage. The object of the world heritage continues to work on recommendations of UNESCO 2012 mission. In the territory of the World Heritage, the main violations of special protection order are connected with illegal stay in the territories of the reserves. Monitoring researches of a snow leopard and argali groups are conducted, field researches on identification of a reindeer summer habitats, works on the project "The organization of long-term monitoring system of climate changes and ecosystems of the reserve "Altaisky" are continued in the territory of the World Heritage. The increase of a tourist stream at the territory of the World Heritage is noted. In territories of national parks and natural parks of regional value, informative tourism is dated to the developed ecological routes.
    [Show full text]
  • УДК 595.789 Dubatolov VV1, Korb SK2, Yakovlev RV3,4 a REVIEW
    Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University 445 УДК 595.789 Dubatolov V.V.1, Korb S.K.2, Yakovlev R.V.3,4 A REVIEW OF THE GENUS TRIPHYSA ZELLER, 1858 (LEPIDOPTERA, SATYRIDAE) 1Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Frunze str. 11, Novosibirsk 630091 Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2Russian Entomological Society, Nizhny Novgorod Division P.O.Box 97, Nizhny Novgorod 603009 Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 3Altai State University pr. Lenina 61, Barnaul, 656049, Russia, E-mail: [email protected] 4Tomsk State University, Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecology Lenina pr. 36, 634050 Tomsk, Russia A review of the genus Triphysa Zeller, 1858 is presented. One new species Triphysa issykkulica sp.n. (type locality: Kazakhstan, W of Almaty, 800 m) and 8 new subspecies are described: Triphysa phryne kasikoporana ssp. n. (type locality: Kasikoporan [NE Turkey, Agri prov.]), Triphysa striatula urumtchiensis ssp. n. (type locality: Urumtchi), Triphysa issykkulica pljustchi ssp. n. (type locality: W. Kirgiziya, Talasskii Mts., Manas), Triphysa nervosa tuvinica ssp. n. (type locality: N. Tuva, near Kyzyl, Tuge Mt.), Triphysa nervosa arturi ssp. n. (type locality: S. Tuva, 15 km WSW Erzin), Triphysa nervosa kobdoensis ssp. n. (type locality: W. Mongolia, Hovd aimak, 15 km S Khara-Us-Nuur lake, 1300 m), Triphysa nervosa mongolaltaica ssp. n. (type locality: Mongolia, Hovd aimak, Bulgan-Gol basin, middle stream of Ulyasutai- Gol river, 2500−3000 m) and Triphysa nervosa brinikhi ssp. n. (type locality: Russia, Chita Reg., Onon distr., 18 km WSW Nizhniy Zasuchey vill., Butyvken lake, Pinus forest, steppe) are described.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiders (Araneae) of Churchill, Manitoba: DNA Barcodes And
    Blagoev et al. BMC Ecology 2013, 13:44 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/13/44 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Spiders (Araneae) of Churchill, Manitoba: DNA barcodes and morphology reveal high species diversity and new Canadian records Gergin A Blagoev1*, Nadya I Nikolova1, Crystal N Sobel1, Paul DN Hebert1,2 and Sarah J Adamowicz1,2 Abstract Background: Arctic ecosystems, especially those near transition zones, are expected to be strongly impacted by climate change. Because it is positioned on the ecotone between tundra and boreal forest, the Churchill area is a strategic locality for the analysis of shifts in faunal composition. This fact has motivated the effort to develop a comprehensive biodiversity inventory for the Churchill region by coupling DNA barcoding with morphological studies. The present study represents one element of this effort; it focuses on analysis of the spider fauna at Churchill. Results: 198 species were detected among 2704 spiders analyzed, tripling the count for the Churchill region. Estimates of overall diversity suggest that another 10–20 species await detection. Most species displayed little intraspecific sequence variation (maximum <1%) in the barcode region of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene, but four species showed considerably higher values (maximum = 4.1-6.2%), suggesting cryptic species. All recognized species possessed a distinct haplotype array at COI with nearest-neighbour interspecific distances averaging 8.57%. Three species new to Canada were detected: Robertus lyrifer (Theridiidae), Baryphyma trifrons (Linyphiidae), and Satilatlas monticola (Linyphiidae). The first two species may represent human-mediated introductions linked to the port in Churchill, but the other species represents a range extension from the USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Spider Records from Caribou Mountains Wildland Provincial Park
    SPIDER RECORDS FROM CARIBOU MOUNTAINS WILDLAND PROVINCIAL PARK Xysticus emertoni Dolomedes triton (Photo: D. Buckle) (Photo: R. Holmberg) Prepared by Wayne R. Nordstrom1 and Donald J. Buckle2 March 2006 1Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre Parks and Protected Areas Division Alberta Community Development 2 620 Albert Avenue Saskatoon, SK S7N 1G7 Table of Contents 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................. 1 2. The Study Site.............................................................................................................................. 1 3. Methods ....................................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Survey Dates....................................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Collection of Spiders .......................................................................................................... 4 3.3 Identification of Spiders ..................................................................................................... 4 4. Results and Discussion................................................................................................................ 4 5. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 9 6. Acknowlegements.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy of the Steppe Eagle Conservation in the Russian Federation
    STRATEGY OF THE STEPPE EAGLE CONSERVATION IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION МОSCOW 2016 Strategy the Steppe Eagle Conservation in the Russian Federation. Moscow, 2016. 43 p. “Strategy of the Steppe Eagle Conservation in the Russian Federa- tion” was approved of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology of the Russian Federation. The strategy was developed by the Working Group consisting of I.V. Karyakin (Chairman of the Working Group), A.V. Kovalenko, A.N. Barashkova, I.E. Smelansky, E.G. Nikolenko. Preparing the Strategy the recommendations and proposals pro- vided by O.A. Goroshko, R.A. Medzidov, M.V. Pestov, V.N. Pimenov, A.V. Saltykov were taken into account. The Draft Strategy was approved by the participants of the interna- tional scientific-practical conference “The Eagles of the Palearctic: study and conservation” (Yelabuga, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia, September 20–22, 2013). ISBN 978-5-9908314-2-1 © Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology of the Russian Federation, 2016 © The Russian Raptor Reasearch and Conservation Network, 2016 © “Sibecocenter” LLC, 2016 © UNDP, 2016 Images in the brochure were made by I.V. Karyakin, A.N. Barashkova, A.V. Kovalenko. The publication is distributed free of charge. Strategy of the Steppe Eagle Conservation in the Russia Federation INTRODUCTION The Steppe Eagle (Aquila nipalensis) was broadly distributed from the Lower Danube, Bessarabia and eastern Ukraine, to East China and until recently, its status did not cause concern. Now, there is a global contraction of the species’ breeding range and it is splitting into isolated peripheral populations. In the European part of Russia, the population size has declined by 92 % in 30 years: from 15,000–25,000 pairs in the 1990s, to 1200–1900 pairs now.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Availability of Recreational Ecosystem Services on Rivers
    Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, August 2021, Vol. 16, No. 2, p. 445 – 456; DOI:10.26471/cjees/2021/016/189 MEASURING THE AVAILABILITY OF RECREATIONAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES ON RIVERS Irina ANDREEVA Laboratory of Water Resources and Water Management, Institute for Water and Environmental Problems, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1, Molodezhnaya St., 656038 Barnaul, Russia email: [email protected] Abstract: Management of recreational water development is based on knowledge of local recreational practices, resources and demand. Non-resort inland regions are very specific. In those of them, where the space is large and the sphere of recreation is underdeveloped, it is impossible to measure the real values of these indicators in situ and in monetary terms. In this study is shows how to conduct a non-monetary assessment of ecosystem services (ESs) in atypical conditions of recreational water use (RW). To solve the problem in Siberia, an approach is proposed to assess the degree of satisfaction of the demand for water recreation by ecosystem proposals of the territory from the point of view of donor capabilities of the environment and its sustainability. Demographic and economic statistics, sociological Analytics, standards of permissible anthropogenic load on ecosystems are used as initial quantitative data for the calculation of supply and demand. The availability of recreational ESs is estimated in relative terms (percent) and shows the share of the resource potentially used by consumers from the available ecosystem supply. In three river basins with different socio-economic conditions and ecosystem proposals, a wide diapason of availability was revealed: 0.3-72.0% – on the coast and 1.0-369.1% – on the water area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ground Beetle Fauna (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of Southeastern Altai R
    ISSN 0013-8738, Entomological Review, 2010, Vol. 90, No. 8, pp. ???–???. © Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2010. Original Russian Text © R.Yu. Dudko, A.V. Matalin, D.N. Fedorenko, 2010, published in Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 2010, Vol. 89, No. 11, pp. 1312–1330. The Ground Beetle Fauna (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of Southeastern Altai R. Yu. Dudkoa, A. V. Matalinb, and D. N. Fedorenkoc aInstitute of Animal Systematics and Ecology, Siberian Division, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 630091 Russia bMoscow Pedagogical State University, Moscow, 129243 Russia e-mail: [email protected] cInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119071 Russia Received October 1, 2009 Abstract—Long-term studies of the ground beetle fauna of Southeastern Altai (SEA) revealed 33 genera and 185 species; 3 and 15 species are reported for the first time from Russia and SEA, respectively. The following gen- era are the most diverse: Bembidion (47 species), Amara and Harpalus (21 each), Pterostichus (14), and Nebria (13). The subarid (35%) and boreal (32%) species prevail in the arealogical spectrum, while the mountain endem- ics comprise 13% of the fauna. The carabid fauna of SEA is heterogeneous in composition and differs significantly from that of the Western and Central Altai. The boreal mountain component mostly comprises tundra species with circum-boreal or circum-arctic ranges, while the subarid component (typical Mongolian together with Ancient Mediterranean species) forms more than one-half of the species diversity in the mountain basins. The species diver- sity increases from the nival mountain belt (15 species, predominantly Altai-Sayan endemics) to moss-lichen tun- dras (40, mostly boreal, species).
    [Show full text]
  • RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1
    RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1 No. 33 Summer 2003 Special issue: The Transformation of Protected Areas in Russia A Ten-Year Review PROMOTING BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN RUSSIA AND THROUGHOUT NORTHERN EURASIA RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS Voice from the Wild (Letter from the Editors)......................................1 Ten Years of Teaching and Learning in Bolshaya Kokshaga Zapovednik ...............................................................24 BY WAY OF AN INTRODUCTION The Formation of Regional Associations A Brief History of Modern Russian Nature Reserves..........................2 of Protected Areas........................................................................................................27 A Glossary of Russian Protected Areas...........................................................3 The Growth of Regional Nature Protection: A Case Study from the Orlovskaya Oblast ..............................................29 THE PAST TEN YEARS: Making Friends beyond Boundaries.............................................................30 TRENDS AND CASE STUDIES A Spotlight on Kerzhensky Zapovednik...................................................32 Geographic Development ........................................................................................5 Ecotourism in Protected Areas: Problems and Possibilities......34 Legal Developments in Nature Protection.................................................7 A LOOK TO THE FUTURE Financing Zapovedniks ...........................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Improving the Coverage and Management Efficiency of Protected Areas in the Steppe Biome of Russia
    Improving the coverage and management efficiency of protected areas in the Steppe Biome of Russia PIMS 4194 Terminal Evaluation, December 2016 Volume II (Annexes) Russian Federation GEF BD SO-1, SP-3 (GEF-4), Outcome 1.1 (GEF-5) Russian Federation Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment United National Development Program (UNDP) Table of Contents Annex 1 Terms of Reference ................................................................................... 2 Annex 2 Rating Scales ............................................................................................. 7 Annex 3 List of documents reviewed .................................................................... 8 Annex 4 MTR Itinerary & list of persons interviewed ....................................... 9 Annex 5 List of members of the ProJect Board (with active members in bold) 13 Annex 6 Maps of pilot sites .................................................................................. 15 Annex 7 The full PRF as it was submitted to the TE ......................................... 19 Annex 8 List of protected areas that were involved in the proJect ................. 57 Annex 9 List of proJect outputs and publications ............................................. 64 Annex 10 Example questionnaire used for data collection .............................. 96 Annex 11 Audit trail of comments on draft TE ................................................. 99 Annex 12 UNEG Code of Conduct Form ......................................................... 100 Annex 13 MTR Final
    [Show full text]