DOCSLIB.ORG

Old World Ruminant Morphophysiology, Life History, and Fossil Record: Exploring Key Innovations of a Diversification Sequence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Old World Ruminant Morphophysiology, Life History, and Fossil Record: Exploring Key Innovations of a Diversification Sequence Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2014 Old world ruminant morphophysiology, life history, and fossil record: exploring key innovations of a diversification sequence Clauss, Marcus ; Rössner, G E Abstract: The omasum of pecoran ruminants (which is absent in tragulids) and shorter gestation periods in non-giraffid crown pecorans (as opposed to giraffids) could represent cases of key innovations that caused disparity in species diversity in extant ruminants. Literature suggests that the different ruminant groups inhabited similar niche spectra at different times, supporting the ‘increased fitness’ interpretation where a key innovation does not mainly open new niches, but allows more efficient use of existing ones. In this respect, we explored data on fossil species diversity of Afro-Eurasian ruminants from the Neogene and Quaternary. Tragulid and giraffid diversity first increased during the Early/Middle Miocene with subsequent declines, whereas bovid and cervid diversity increased distinctively. Our resulting narrative, combining digestive physiology, life history and the fossil record, thus provides an explanation for the sequence of diversity patterns in Old-World ruminants. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5735/086.051.0210 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-94203 Journal Article Published Version Originally published at: Clauss, Marcus; Rössner, G E (2014). Old world ruminant morphophysiology, life history, and fossil record: exploring key innovations of a diversification sequence. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 51:80-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5735/086.051.0210 Ann. Zool. Fennici 51: 80–94 ISSN 0003-455X (print), ISSN 1797-2450 (online) Helsinki 7 April 2014 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 2014 Old world ruminant morphophysiology, life history, and fossil record: exploring key innovations of a diversification sequence Marcus Clauss1,* & Gertrud E. Rössner2,3,4 1) Clinic of Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstr. 260, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland (*corresponding author’s e-mail: mclauss@ vetclinics.uzh.ch) 2) SNSB-Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie, Richard-Wagner-Str. 10, D-80339 Munich, Germany 3) Department für Geo- und Umweltwissenschaften, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Richard-Wagner-Strasse 10, D-80333 München, Germany 4) GeoBio-Center LMU, Richard-Wagner-Strasse 10, D-80333 München, Germany Received 3 Apr. 2013, final version received 4 Sep. 2013, accepted 4 Sep. 2013 Clauss, M. & Rössner, G. E. 2014: Old world ruminant morphophysiology, life history, and fossil record: exploring key innovations of a diversification sequence. Ann.— Zool. Fennici 51: 80–94. The omasum of pecoran ruminants (which is absent in tragulids) and shorter gesta- tion periods in non-giraffid crown pecorans (as opposed to giraffids) could represent cases of key innovations that caused disparity in species diversity in extant ruminants. Literature suggests that the different ruminant groups inhabited similar niche spectra at different times, supporting the ‘increased fitness’ interpretation where a key innova- tion does not mainly open new niches, but allows more efficient use of existing ones. In this respect, we explored data on fossil species diversity of Afro-Eurasian ruminants from the Neogene and Quaternary. Tragulid and giraffid diversity first increased during the Early/Middle Miocene with subsequent declines, whereas bovid and cervid diver- sity increased distinctively. Our resulting narrative, combining digestive physiology, life history and the fossil record, thus provides an explanation for the sequence of diversity patterns in Old-World ruminants. Introduction from the structure of the first terrestrial tetra- pod’s limb to the unguligrade extremity of larger Evolutionary progress and key herbivores (Shubin et al. 2006, O’Leary et al. innovations 2013), from the addition of the hypocone to the molar morphology of therian mammals (Hunter That progress occurred during evolutionary his- & Jernvall 1995) — the concept of progress in tory at a macroevolutionary level is usually not functional morphology appears intuitive. What an issue of debate (e.g. Rosenzweig & McCord is often debated is progress at a microevolution- 1991). From the anatomy of the first multicel- ary level: why does a certain taxonomic group lular organisms to complex plants and animals, appear to be more successful in terms of spe- ANN. ZOOL. FENNICI Vol. 51 • Tragulid and pecoran diversity 81 ciation than another, like certain spider clades the plausibility of the argument is the major indi- (Bond & Opell 1998) or a certain clade among cator of its quality, but the underlying hypothesis phyllostomid bats (Dumont et al. 2012)? Can cannot be tested statistically. we explain this in terms of evolutionary progress Hence, phenotypic traits without a potential and a hypothetical, more efficient functionality, to fossilize such as soft tissue anatomy, physiol- maybe even linked to a certain (and potentially ogy and life history characteristics provide ideal new) niche, in the sense of ‘directional evolu- bases to explore key innovations, because they tion’ (Liem 1990), or do we choose to consider are usually not used to reconstruct phylogenetic morphophysiological variety at low taxonomic relationships. Under the assumption that those levels as random variety solving the same prob- traits observed in extant species are representa- lems in different ways (of similar efficiency) in tive for the entire clade including fossil spe- the sense of neutral evolution (ibid.)? cies, the adaptive value of such features can be The concept of key innovation plays an assessed in comparative and even experimental important role in the more general concept of studies on extant species. A prominent example evolutionary progress; key innovations may where soft tissue anatomy and physiology was explain competitive displacement (Nitecki 1990, used to explain the evolutionary diversification Rosenzweig & McCord 1991, Heard & Hauser is the digestive physiology of ungulate her- 1995, Hunter 1998). Morphophysiological, bivores. Using the concept of a difference in behavioural and life history peculiarities of a the digestive function of hindgut and foregut certain clade do not only help to define that cladefermenters (Janis 1976, Duncan et al. 1990), taxonomically, but represent potential candidates Janis et al. (1994) have explained the apparent for innovations that helped shape that clade’s displacement of equids by ruminants, conclud- evolutionary success. However, apart from rare ing a primarily digestion-driven evolutionary exceptions when fossils also reveal details, e.g. advantage for ruminants. Similarly, the differ- of copulation (Joyce et al. 2012), pregnancy, ence in species diversity between Tylopoda and precociality and birth (Gingerich et al. 2009), or Ruminantia was speculated to result from the sociality (Bibi et al. 2012), mostly only a certain differences in functionality of the sorting mecha- subset of morphological attributes fossilizes. The nism that prevents Tylopoda from achieving the emphasis in the concept of key innovations has higher food intakes observed in many Ruminan- therefore traditionally been on hard tissue mor- tia (Clauss et al. 2010a). This latter hypothesis phological aspects (Burggren & Bemis 1990). correlates well with the apparent replacement One perceived problem with the concept of of camelids by ruminants in Janis et al. (1994). key innovation is the tautology amounting from Because of their prominence in specimen and the likewise usage of morphological characters species number in the fossil record, and detailed to identify a (diverse) clade and as a reason knowledge about their comparative anatomy and for its success (diversity). The recent develop- physiology (Clauss et al. 2008), ungulate her- ment of deriving phylogenetic estimates from bivores appear as promising test cases for the genetic information alleviates this problem and exploration of evolutionary success and related facilitates statistical approaches to test for the key innovations. effect of certain morphological characteristics on diversification rates in extant species clusters (e.g. Dumont et al. 2012). For most fossil taxa, Tragulidae, Pecora, and ruminant however, the lack of genetic material means that stomach anatomy the problem is not readily alleviated. Another solution is to use a character considered to be Compelling evidence of extended comparative apomorphic or convergent in several different analyses including phenotypic as well as molec- taxa, which can be compared to closely related ular data (Janis & Scott 1987, Gentry & Hooker taxa in which it is absent (e.g. Hunter & Jernvall 1988, Hernández-Fernández & Vrba 2005, Has- 1995). Thus, studies of key innovations in the sanin et al. 2012) supports the view that Traguli- fossil record often represent narratives, in which dae are the sister group of Pecora, and the most 82 Clauss & Rössner • ANN. ZOOL. FENNICI Vol. 51 equator to subpolar regions (Wilson & Mitter- meier 2011), whereas all of the tragulids are of small size, and inhabit exclusively dense forest undergrowth or thickets within these forests in Africa and southeast Asia (Meijaard 2011). Although very few peer-reviewed reports on their natural diet exist (but see Dubost 1984), extant tragulids are commonly
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Investigating Sexual Dimorphism in Ceratopsid Horncores
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2013-01-25 Investigating Sexual Dimorphism in Ceratopsid Horncores Borkovic, Benjamin Borkovic, B. (2013). Investigating Sexual Dimorphism in Ceratopsid Horncores (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/26635 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/498 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Investigating Sexual Dimorphism in Ceratopsid Horncores by Benjamin Borkovic A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES CALGARY, ALBERTA JANUARY, 2013 © Benjamin Borkovic 2013 Abstract Evidence for sexual dimorphism was investigated in the horncores of two ceratopsid dinosaurs, Triceratops and Centrosaurus apertus. A review of studies of sexual dimorphism in the vertebrate fossil record revealed methods that were selected for use in ceratopsids. Mountain goats, bison, and pronghorn were selected as exemplar taxa for a proof of principle study that tested the selected methods, and informed and guided the investigation of sexual dimorphism in dinosaurs. Skulls of these exemplar taxa were measured in museum collections, and methods of analysing morphological variation were tested for their ability to demonstrate sexual dimorphism in their horns and horncores.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Animal Weapons
    The Evolution of Animal Weapons Douglas J. Emlen Division of Biological Sciences, The University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59812; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2008. 39:387-413 Key Words First published online as a Review in Advance on animal diversity, sexual selection, male competition, horns, antlers, tusks September 2, 2008 The Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Abstract Systematics is online at ecolsys.annualreviews.org Males in many species invest substantially in structures that are used in com- This article's doi: bat with rivals over access to females. These weapons can attain extreme 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173 502 proportions and have diversified in form repeatedly. I review empirical lit- Copyright © 2008 by Annual Reviews. erature on the function and evolution of sexually selected weapons to clarify All rights reserved important unanswered questions for future research. Despite their many 1543-592X/08/1201-0387$20.00 shapes and sizes, and the multitude of habitats within which they function, animal weapons share many properties: They evolve when males are able to defend spatially restricted critical resources, they are typically the most variable morphological structures of these species, and this variation hon- estly reflects among-individual differences in body size or quality. What is not clear is how, or why, these weapons diverge in form. The potential for male competition to drive rapid divergence in weapon morphology remains one of the most exciting and understudied topics in sexual selection research today. 3*7 INTRODUCTION Sexual selection is credited with the evolution of nature's most extravagant structures, and these include showy male adornments that are attractive to females (ornaments) and an arsenal of outgrowths that function in male-male combat (weapons) (Darwin 1871).
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of Prolibytherium Magnieri Arambourg, 1961 (Artiodactyla, Climacoceratidae) in Egypt
    Discovery of Prolibytherium magnieri Arambourg, 1961 (Artiodactyla, Climacoceratidae) in Egypt Martin PICKFORD Chaire de Paléoanthropologie et de Préhistoire, Collège de France, 11 place M. Berthelot, F-75005 Paris (France) Laboratoire de Paléontologie, UMR 8596 du CNRS, 8 rue Buffon, F-75231 Paris cedex 05 (France) [email protected] Yousri Saad ATTIA Medhat Said ABD EL GHANY Egyptian Geological Museum, EGSMA, Athar El Nabi, Misr El Kadima, Cairo (Egypt) [email protected] Pickford M., Attia Y. S. & Abd El Ghany M. S. 2001. — Discovery of Prolibytherium magnieri Arambourg, 1961 (Artiodactyla, Climacoceratidae) in Egypt. Geodiversitas 23 (4) : 647-652. ABSTRACT While searching for fossils from Wadi Moghara in the collections of the Egyptian Geological Museum, the authors came across some undescribed remains of Prolibytherium magnieri Arambourg, 1961. A brain case with attached frontal appendages (CGM 82975) has some matrix adhering to the bone which indicates that it is most probably from Wadi Moghara, although KEY WORDS Artiodactyla, there is no documentary evidence as to its discovery locus. Some mandible Ruminantia, fragments and postcranial elements which can be assigned to Prolibytherium Climacoceratidae, Arambourg, 1961 on the basis of their size were collected from Wadi early Miocene, Egypt, Moghara by R. Fourtau and others prior to 1920, but have remained undes- biochronology. cribed. The fossils are sufficiently interesting to warrant description. GEODIVERSITAS • 2001 • 23 (4) © Publications Scientifiques du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. www.mnhn.fr/publication/ 647 Pickford M., Attia Y. S. & Abd El Ghany M. S. RÉSUMÉ Découverte de Prolibytherium magnieri Arambourg, 1961 (Artiodactyla, Climacoceratidae) en Égypte. En recherchant des fossiles du Wadi Moghara dans les collections de l’Egyptian Geological Museum, les auteurs ont découvert des restes inédits de Prolibytherium magnieri Arambourg, 1961.
    [Show full text]
  • Liebe ID-Freunde
    [Back to internetlibrary.html] Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig 8 May 2007 (last update 16 October 2010), updates 27 Oct. 2007 with Appendix on Cameron & du Toit 2007: "Winning by a Neck…" pp .62-78; 5 Oct. 2008 some language corrections and a brief comment on Brown et al. 2007: "Extensive population genetic structure in the giraffe" on p. 79. The Evolution of the Long-Necked Giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis L.) What do we really know? (Part 2) As for Part 1, see http://www.weloennig.de/Giraffe.pdf Some Questions, Facts and Quotations to Supplement Part 1 Repetitio est mater studiorum –Repetition is the best teacher (literally: the mother of studies) Summary Introduction: the story which is commonly taught in high schools about the evolution of the long- necked giraffe by natural selection (feeding-competition-hypothesis) fails to explain, among other things, the size differences between males and females. Giraffe cows are up to 1.5 meters shorter than the giraffe bulls, not to mention the offspring. The wide migration range of the giraffe and the low heights of the most common plants in their diet likewise argue against the dominant selection hypothesis. Now to the main points: 1) The fossil „links“, which according to the theory should appear successively and replace each other, usually exist simultaneously for long periods of time. 2) Evolutionary derivations based on similarities rely on circular reasoning (to refer once more to Kuhn's statement) 3) The giraffe has eight cervical vertebrae. Although the 8th vertebra displays almost all the characteristics of a neck vertebra, as an exception to the rule the first rib pair is attached there.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article in PDF Format
    New stem giraffoid ruminants from the early and middle Miocene of Namibia Jorge MORALES Departamento de Paleobiologia, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, José Gutierrez Abascal 2, E-28006, Madrid (Spain) Dolores SORIA Departamento de Paleobiologia, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, José Gutierrez Abascal 2, E-28006, Madrid (Spain) Martin PICKFORD Chaire de Paléoanthropologie et de Préhistoire, Collège de France, 11 place Marcelin-Berthelot, F-75005, Paris (France) Laboratoire de Paléontologie, UMR 8569 du CNRS, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle 8 rue de Button, F-75231 Paris cedex 05 (France) Morales J., Soria D. & Pickford M. 1999. — New stem giraffoid ruminants from the early and middle Miocene of Namibia. Geodiversitas (21)2: 229-253. ABSTRACT At the early and middle Miocene localities of the Sperrgebiet, Namibia, new material of climacoceratid tuminants have been collected recently. From Elisabethfeld we describe new material belonging to Propalaeoryx austroafri- canus Stromer, 1926, together with a new genus and species of climacocera­ tid Sperrgebietomeryx wardi n. gen., n. sp., a species without frontal appendages close to Propalaeoryx and to primitive early Miocene European ruminants such as Andegameryx. From the locality of Arrisdrift, we define another new genus and species of climacoceratid with frontal appendages, KEYWORDS Ruminantia, Orangemeryx bendey n. gen., n. sp., characterized by its complex tined frontal Giraffoidea, apophyses. Comparison of the dentition and postcranial skeleton of this Climacoceratidae, genus and those of Sperrgebietomeryx suggests a close phylogenetic relation­ Miocene, Namibia. ships between them. 1999 • 21 (2) 229 Morales J., Soria D. & Pickford M. RESUME Nouveaux ruminants giraffoïdes du Miocène ancien et moyen de Namibie.
    [Show full text]
  • Wessels, W (2009). Miocene Rodent Evolution and Migration. Muroidea
    Miocene rodent evolution and migration Muroidea from Pakistan, Turkey and Northern Africa W. Wessels GEOLOGICA ULTRAIECTINA Mededelingen van de Faculteit Geowetenschappen departement Aardwetenschappen Universiteit Utrecht No. 307 ISBN 978-90-5744-170-7 Graphic design and figures: GeoMedia, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University (7497) Miocene rodent evolution and migration Muroidea from Pakistan, Turkey and Northern Africa Evolutie en migratie van Miocene knaagdieren Muroidea afkomstig uit Pakistan, Turkije en Noord Afrika (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof.dr. J.C. Stoof, ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op maandag 8 juni 2009 des middags te 4.15 uur door Wilma Wessels geboren op 9 december 1955 te Vriezenveen Promotor: Prof.dr. J.W.F. Reumer Contents Part 1 Introduction 1 Introduction 13 2 Correlation of some Miocene faunas from Northern Africa, Turkey and Pakistan 17 by means of Myocricetodontidae Published in Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen B 90(1): 65-82 (1987), Wessels W., Ünay. E. & Tobien H. 2.1 Abstract 17 2.2 Introduction 17 2.3 The Pakistani Myocricetodontinae 19 2.3.2 Taxonomy 19 2.3.3 Discussion of the Pakistani Myocricetodontinae 24 2.4 The Turkish Myocricetodontinae 24 2.4.2 Taxonomy 25 2.4.3 Discussion of the Turkish Myocricetodontinae 31 2.5 Conclusions 31 2.6 Acknowledgements 31 Part 2 Rodents from Europe, Turkey and Northern Africa 3 Gerbillidae from the Miocene and Pliocene of Europe 35 Published in Mitteilungen der Bayerischen Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Historische Geologie 38: 187-207 (1998), Wessels W.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammalia, Cetartiodactyla)
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Systematics and Evolution of the Miocene Three-Horned Palaeomerycid Ruminants (Mammalia, Cetartiodactyla) Israel M. Sánchez1*, Juan L. Cantalapiedra2, María Ríos1, Victoria Quiralte1, Jorge Morales1 1 Departamento de Paleobiología, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales-CSIC, Madrid, Spain, 2 Leibniz- Institut für Evolutions und Biodiversitätsforschung, Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany * [email protected] Abstract Palaeomerycids were strange three-horned Eurasian Miocene ruminants known through OPEN ACCESS fossils from Spain to China. We here study their systematics, offering the first cladistic phy- logeny of the best-known species of the group, and also reassess their phylogenetic posi- Citation: Sánchez IM, Cantalapiedra JL, Ríos M, Quiralte V, Morales J (2015) Systematics and tion among ruminants, which is currently disputed. The beautifully preserved remains of a Evolution of the Miocene Three-Horned new palaeomerycid from middle Miocene deposits of Spain, Xenokeryx amidalae gen. et sp. Palaeomerycid Ruminants (Mammalia, nov., helps us to better understand palaeomerycid anatomy, especially that of the nuchal Cetartiodactyla). PLoS ONE 10(12): e0143034. region in the skull, significantly improving our current knowledge on these enigmatic rumi- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143034 nants. Our results show two main lineages of palaeomerycids, one containing the genus Editor: Matthew C. Mihlbachler, NYIT College of Ampelomeryx diagnosed by a characteristic type of cranium / cranial appendages and Osteopathic Medicine, UNITED STATES some dental derived traits, and another one that clusters those forms more closely related Received: September 3, 2015 to Triceromeryx than to Ampelomeryx, characterized by a more derived dentition and a set Accepted: October 29, 2015 of apomorphic cranial features. Xenokeryx branches as a basal offshoot of this clade.
    [Show full text]
  • International Conference on Ruminant Phylogenetics Munich 03.-06
    Zitteliana An International Journal of Palaeontology and Geobiology Series B /Reihe B Abhandlung der Bayerischen Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie 31 International Conference on Ruminant Phylogenetics Munich 2013 03. – 06. September 2013 Programme and Abstracts nal Confe tio re a nc rn e e o t n n I • • R e k c 3 o u F e n i 1 t m r a M 0 G P i S B 2 n © a h n c ICRPM2013 i t n P u hy M logenetics Munich 2013 Zitteliana An International Journal of Palaeontology and Geobiology Series B/Reihe B Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie 31 International Conference on Ruminant Phylogenetics Munich 2013 he B 31 Rei Series B/ Zitteliana An International Journal of Palaeontology and Geobiology Series B /Reihe B Abhandlung der Bayerischen Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie 31 International Conference on Ruminant Phylogenetics Munich 2013 03. – 06. September 2013 Programme and Abstracts nal Confe tio re a nc rn e e o t n n I • • R e k c 3 o u F e n i 1 t m r a M 0 G P i S B 2 n © a h n c ICRPM2013 t i n P An International Journal of Palaeontology and Geobiology u hy M logenetics Zitteliana Munich 2013 03.-06. September 2013 Programme and Abstracts Paläontologie Bayerische GeoBio- & Geobiologie Staatssammlung Center LMU München für Paläontologie und Geologie LMU München Munich 2013 Zitteliana B 31 48 Seiten München, 01.09.2013 ISSN 1612-4138 2 Editors-in-Chief: Gert Wörheide, Michael Krings Guest-Editor: Gertrud Rössner Production and Layout: Martine Focke Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie Editorial Board A.
    [Show full text]
  • New Fossils of Giraffoidea (Mammalia: Artiodactyla) from the Lothidok Formation (Kalodirr Member, Early Miocene, West Turkana, K
    Zitteliana B 32 (2014) 63 New fossils of Giraffoidea (Mammalia: Artiodactyla) from the Lothidok Formation (Kalodirr Member, Early Miocene, West Turkana, Kenya) contribute to our understanding of early giraffoid diversity Ari Grossman1, 2* and Nikos Solounias3 Zitteliana B 32, 63 – 70 1Department of Anatomy, Midwestern University, 19555 N. 59th Avenue, Glendale, München, 31.12.2014 Arizona 85308. 2School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287; Manuscript received 3Department of Anatomy, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, 26.03.2014; revision 8000 Northern Boulevard, Old Westbury, NY 11568. accepted 03.06.2014 *Author for correspondence and reprint requests; E-mail: [email protected] ISSN 1612 - 4138 Abstract Excavations at Kalodirr and Moruorot from the Lothidok Formation (ca. 17 mya) in the West Turkana Region of Kenya have yielded several cranial appendages, dentitions and postcranial fossils that can be attributed to either Climacoceratidae or the Giraffidae. An additional unusual and unique fossil, we describe in this paper for the first time, is, in our opinion, a novel stem-giraffoid cranial appen- dage. The Climacoceras from Kalodirr is the oldest representative of the genus, extending Climacoceratidae into the Early Miocene. We establish that by the end of the Early Miocene in Africa the Giraffoidea included at least two families, Climacoceratidae and Giraffidae, distinguished by different types of cranial appendages. Furthermore, the Giraffidae include at least two distinct lineages, represented by distinctive ossicones found at Kalodirr and Moruorot. Thus, we recognize that unlike at older sites where only Canthumeryx is recognized, by the later part of the early Miocene, Giraffoidea communities in East Africa include as many as three genera, and perhaps even four.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Africa: a Cradle of Evolution
    Review Articles South African Journal of Science 100, March/April 2004 205 Southern Africa: a cradle of evolution Martin Pickford tended to sidetrack scientists into thinking that many lineages originated in that continental mass rather than in Africa, and in Thanks to recent palaeontological surveys in the Miocene of south- particular southern Africa. Fourth, many of the lineages that ern Africa, it has become evident that, like the endemic plants of the evolved in southern Africa have subsequently spread north- Cape Floristic Region, there are numerous lineages of animals that wards into the topics and beyond, their presence in the north has originated in southern Africa during the Neogene. The spread of been misinterpreted as supporting an equatorial or northern some of the plants and many hitherto endemic southern vertebrate origin for the group. lineages northwards into the tropics and beyond into Eurasia from It is now increasingly evident that many lineages of animals Middle Miocene times onwards, has watered down the appreciation have a longer history in southern Africa than anywhere else. of endemism among the vertebrates, because several of the Even though the ruminants and perissodactyls surely origi- lineages that used to be endemic to southern Africa have subse- nated in Eurasia, once they reached Africa they diversified and quently become pan-African or even cosmopolitan. Among these produced several endemic lineages. Among these the Bovidae, are the ostrich, the Nile crocodile, pliohyracids, bovids and other Climacoceratidae, and Dicerotinae (and perhaps Tragulidae) groups, which previously were thought to have originated in the seem to have evolved in southern Africa and then spread north- tropics or even in Eurasia.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Origin, Evolution and Phylogeny of Giraffes Giraffa Camelopardalis
    2003 Mitchell & Skinner: Origin, evolution and phylogeny of giraffes 51 On the origin, evolution and phylogeny of giraffes Giraffa camelopardalis G. MITCHELL1, 2 FRSSAf & J.D. SKINNER2 FRSSAf 1Department of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY82071, USA, e-mail: [email protected]; 2Veterinary Wildlife Unit, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort 0110, South Africa The origin, phylogeny, and evolution of modern giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis) is obscure. We review here the literature and conclude that the proximate ancestors of modern giraffes probably evolved in southern central Europe about 8 million years ago (Mya). These ancestors appear to have arisen from the gelocid ancestral assemblage of 20–25 Mya via the family Palaeomerycidae. From the palaeomerycids arose the Antilocaprinae (Pronghorns) via the subfamily Dromomerycinae, and two subfamilies of giraffids, the Climacoceratidae and Canthumerycidae. The terminal genus of the Climacoceratid line was the now extinct massive giraffid Sivatherium sp. The Canthumerycids gave rise to the okapi and giraffes via the intermediate forms of Giraffokeryx, Palaeotragus sp. (of which the okapi is the extant form), Samotherium sp. and Bohlinia sp. all of which are extinct. Stimulated by climate change, progeny of Bohlinia entered China and north India, evolved into typical Giraffa species and became extinct there about 4 Mya. Similarly, following their preferred habi- tat, African Giraffa entered Africa via Ethiopia about 7 Mya. Here, seemingly unaffected by the climate changes occurring to the east and causing extinction of its Asian counterparts, Giraffa radiated into several sequential and coeval species culminating with the evolution of G. camelopardalis in East Africa from where it dispersed to its modern range.
    [Show full text]
  • From Neogene Fissure Fillings in Gargano (Italy) Part 1: the Cranial Osteology of Hoplitomeryx Gen
    Leinders, Neogene Hoplitomerycidae from Gargano, Italy, Pt 1, Scripta Geol., 70 (1983) 1 Hoplitomerycidae fam. nov. (Ruminan• tia, Mammalia) from Neogene fissure fillings in Gargano (Italy) Part 1: The cranial osteology of Hoplitomeryx gen. nov. and a discussion on the classification of pecoran families J. Leinders Leinders, J. Hoplitomerycidae fam. nov. (Ruminantia, Mammalia) from Neogene fissure fillings in Gargano (Italy). Part 1: The cranial osteology of Hoplitomeryx gen. nov. and a discussion on the classification of pecoran families. — Scripta Geol., 70: 1-68, 4 figs., 10 pls, Leiden, April 1984. It is concluded that the endemic Ruminantia from the Late Miocene island-fauna of Monte Gargano (Italy) originated from antlerless Cervidae. This in spite of the fact that these Ruminantia from Gargano evidently had horncore-like cranial appendages. The presence of horncores, in combination with the presence of characters diagnostic for the Cervidae, justifies the classification of the Gargano ruminants in a separate family: Hoplitomerycidae fam. nov. which family is included in the Cervoidea. The classification of the pecoran families is discussed. The Giraffidae are more closely related to the Bovidae than to the Cervidae. It is proposed that the Giraffidae be transferred from the Cervoidea to the Bovoidea. Palaeomeryx is probably not closely related to the Giraffidae. Joseph Leinders, Institute for Earth Sciences, P.O. Box 80.021.3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands. Introduction 2 Taxonomy 4 Description of the holotype cranium (RGM 260 965)
    [Show full text]