DOCSLIB.ORG

Big Benefits for the Mohawk River

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Big Benefits for the Mohawk River SIMPLE STEPS: BIG BENEFITS FOR THE MOHAWK RIVER Oneida County Sewer District Overflow Mitigation Project 2015 Progress Report 2 1 R y iv w e r H R e d t R ta om S e Ninemile Creek O 2 r 1 isk y a w ny R S H d ta e t t e ta R reek S o ne C u Cra te 2 9 8 1 oute State R d R 2 t 3 r y o w p r H i Reservoir S y A t t a n t C e u R o O r a o C ld Airport Oriskany u n te R e M i 6 t v C Interceptor 9 S o e r r MARCY r h e a R e v w d e i k R k R Creek iv Reall e Oriskany r 8 y d w k R H rt e o e e S r t irp t a C DEERFIELD A ate t H S Ju wy s d 49 k d c R e d k D e e r k C e Utica Reservoir e s r e n C Whitesboro Oriskany o y 8 J e l y d i w Interceptor r t H G O S te r k i a s t w k S S WHITESTOWN a a ta n h te y o H w B M y Marcy l 4 West v 9 d Erie Canal Interceptor reek I 90 Interceptor ny C iska Or reek Sauquoit C Whitesboro Deerfield Deans Creek I Interceptor Sauquoit Creek 0 90 9 I Pump Station Barnes Ave. 7 7 )" I 90 t Pump Station S East n I 7 e to 90 v in A Interceptor l d C n O la H Yorkville ri M e erk sk 0 Mohawk River im an oh L er R y S )" 9 a d t 7 w Interceptor Yorkville W k I R iv S e t d r at R k e e R n e o r to u C te in E 5 l d Mohawk River We C u st A rteria North Utica M Interceptor l Hwy wy Interceptor Harts Hill l H ia WPCP ter Interceptor New York Mills Ar uth So UTICA S rth ta No te H S w tat y e R 8 ou 4 te 5 r 0 Railroad Bleec S l D ker cia St S er Interceptor eneca Tp m ke om 5 C wy ek te H re wy S Grace Creek ta C al H a S S d ri Mu Arte u t th q a S u Starch Factory tate Route 5 So u Interceptor t N o e i t R Interceptor Lim d C o ber Reservoir 2 lost R d R r u d R s e i e t n r e to a k Reservoir 5 lin P 2 C 3 w e 3 N New Hartford Mud Creek k e Interceptor e O r Oriskany Creek C x f H n o ig le r b Legend d y G R R n d a d d lv R y Manhole a S tic U Laterals NEW HARTFORD St tica ts Rd U M Tibbit Interceptors S u h d e r C College St m r Yorkville Interceptora e n e t B k S ro w o oGrace Creek Interceptork d a Sauquoit Creek P e al M me Railroad Interceptor Interceptor r C ree Approximate Divide Approximate Divide k W between the h i t e )"Pump Station Sauquoit Creek and C d Hill Rd r Re e Starch Factory e )"k Pump Station Interceptor R WPCP S ob G t e l a rt e t s n e Cr County Roads C H ee re w k e k y State Roads 8 S a u Interstate q u G o l i e t n Water Bodies C C r r e e e Streams e k k E S l City of Utica t e a k y te Finger Cree B R r o o u VILLAGEo te k 1 2 k S o Clayville E a o i r e u y B q B u y New Hartford r o e o i i o t E k C New York Mills r e e Oriskany k Whitesboro PARIS Yorkville TOWN Clayville y Creek Deerfield Turke Marcy Oneida County S a u New Hartford q u o it Sewer District C Paris S r t e 2 a e 1 te k Whitestown te R u o o Service Area u R t e e Oneida County Boundary t Sau 8 ta quoit C S reek Scale: ONEIDA COUNTY, NY 1 inch equals 6,000 feet OCSD Service Area 0 3,000 6,000 12,000 Feet November 2007 J:/GIS/OneidaCounty/Maps/Figure1-1_12-3-07-Interceptor and Laterals _11x17_Portrait.mxd ± FIGURE 1-1 FROM THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE What a journey this has been. For more than eight years, we’ve researched, studied, mapped, negotiated and, most importantly, progressed a project that aims to redefine our County’s wastewater system. Why? The Oneida County Sewer District (OCSD) Sanitary Sewer Overflow Mitigation Project is vital to restoring and maintaining our aging conveyance system. This critical infrastructure is key to future economic development within our region. Without enhancement, progress within the OCSD simply cannot advance. Guided by the input and collaboration of our project steering committee, a group consisting of representatives from each District municipality, we’re proud to share with you the significant accomplishments outlined in the following pages. Our achievements include advancing critical rehabilitation and repair projects, establishing standard processes to ensure the continued and consistent maintenance of our District’s system, the start of data collection with the final installation of flow meters, and expanding public and resident awareness and support. While our work is far from over, let’s take a step back and appreciate what can be accomplished when we work together. Anthony J. Picente Jr. County Executive Oneida County SIMPLE STEPS: BIG BENEFITS FOR THE MOHAWK RIVER Operation Ripple Effect™ is Normally, our sanitary sewer system has a significant rainfall, that same sewer enough capacity to operate properly. line can become overloaded with excess an Oneida County initiative But heavy rains or snowmelts can cause water from only 36 homes if downspouts stormwater to overwhelm the system and are connected to it. that acts as a guide to result in overflows into the Mohawk River. Sump pumps that discharge to the provide simple steps to help National studies have shown that as sanitary sewer can also be significant much as 50% of the excess stormwater in private property contributors of excess keep the Mohawk River clean. sanitary sewer system comes from private flow through the system. Discharge from property. One big source is rainwater that as few as 10 sump pumps can overload This program highlights how is captured in roof gutters that then flows that same 8-inch sewer line. through a downspout that is connected individual actions add up to into a sanitary sewer. Another significant By discharging diluted raw sewage into source is the discharge from sump the Mohawk River, we are potentially widespread improvements pumps. damaging the natural ecosystem and limiting our future generation’s ability to for the system. Operation Ripple Effect is an Oneida enjoy the resource that helped develop County initiative that acts as a guide the Mohawk Valley. In addition to to provide simple steps to help keep impacting the river, if these overflows are the Mohawk River clean. This program not reduced, Oneida County faces harsh highlights how individual actions add fines that would place a severe burden on up to widespread improvements for the local residents and hinder future regional system. economic development. A standard 8-inch sanitary sewer line can service as many as 456 homes. Yet, during In addition to impacting the river, if these overflows are not reduced, Oneida County faces harsh fines that would place a severe burden on local residents and hinder future regional economic development. v OCSD Sanitary Sewer Overflow Mitigation Project Performing engineering Operation Ripple Effect™ is an outcome of the OCSD Sanitary 1investigations to Sewer Overflow Mitigation Project. Initiated in 2007, this project is a multi-year initiative designed to reduce sanitary determine sanitary sewer overflows. With the guidance of a Steering Committee sewer problems, composed of representatives from each city, town, and repairs and upgrades village within the district, the project is comprised of three major components that will reduce overflows: 2Identifying funding to enable repairs Completing sewer 3system repairs and upgrades to reduce infiltration and inflow (I/I), and increasing pumping and treatment capacity Rehabilitation& Repair Progress From 2014 to 2015, approximately 60 miles of additional sewer lines have benefited from rehabilitation or repairs. Since implementing repair and rehabilitation work, 1,345 manholes and 103.5 miles of pipe have been rehabilitated – an accomplishment to be celebrated! CONTRACT 6 CONTRACT 7 CONTRACT 8 CONTRACT 10 Location: Location: Location: Location: The towns of New Hartford, Towns of Whitestown Town of New Hartford Village of Whitesboro and Paris and Whitestown, and and New Hartford Description: Town of Whitestown the villages of Clayville and Description: Pipe grouting, lateral grouting, Status: New Hartford. Pipe lining, pipe grouting, open cut and spot repair liners; Bids were received on Description: lateral grouting, lateral lining, small amount of pipe lining.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mohawk River Watershed – HUC-12
    ID Number Name of Mohawk Watershed 1 Switz Kill 2 Flat Creek 3 Headwaters West Creek 4 Kayaderosseras Creek 5 Little Schoharie Creek 6 Headwaters Mohawk River 7 Headwaters Cayadutta Creek 8 Lansing Kill 9 North Creek 10 Little West Kill 11 Irish Creek 12 Auries Creek 13 Panther Creek 14 Hinckley Reservoir 15 Nowadaga Creek 16 Wheelers Creek 17 Middle Canajoharie Creek 18 Honnedaga 19 Roberts Creek 20 Headwaters Otsquago Creek 21 Mill Creek 22 Lewis Creek 23 Upper East Canada Creek 24 Shakers Creek 25 King Creek 26 Crane Creek 27 South Chuctanunda Creek 28 Middle Sprite Creek 29 Crum Creek 30 Upper Canajoharie Creek 31 Manor Kill 32 Vly Brook 33 West Kill 34 Headwaters Batavia Kill 35 Headwaters Flat Creek 36 Sterling Creek 37 Lower Ninemile Creek 38 Moyer Creek 39 Sixmile Creek 40 Cincinnati Creek 41 Reall Creek 42 Fourmile Brook 43 Poentic Kill 44 Wilsey Creek 45 Lower East Canada Creek 46 Middle Ninemile Creek 47 Gooseberry Creek 48 Mother Creek 49 Mud Creek 50 North Chuctanunda Creek 51 Wharton Hollow Creek 52 Wells Creek 53 Sandsea Kill 54 Middle East Canada Creek 55 Beaver Brook 56 Ferguson Creek 57 West Creek 58 Fort Plain 59 Ox Kill 60 Huntersfield Creek 61 Platter Kill 62 Headwaters Oriskany Creek 63 West Kill 64 Headwaters South Branch West Canada Creek 65 Fly Creek 66 Headwaters Alplaus Kill 67 Punch Kill 68 Schenevus Creek 69 Deans Creek 70 Evas Kill 71 Cripplebush Creek 72 Zimmerman Creek 73 Big Brook 74 North Creek 75 Upper Ninemile Creek 76 Yatesville Creek 77 Concklin Brook 78 Peck Lake-Caroga Creek 79 Metcalf Brook 80 Indian
    [Show full text]
  • Stateofnewyork 9054--Binasse
    S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 9054--B I N A S S E M B L Y January 17, 2012 ___________ A BUDGET BILL, submitted by the Governor pursuant to article seven of the Constitution -- read once and referred to the Committee on Ways and Means -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee -- again reported from said committee with amendments, ordered reprinted as amended and recommit- ted to said committee AN ACT making appropriations for the support of government CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: 1 Section 1. a) The several amounts specified in this chapter for capi- 2 tal projects, or so much thereof as shall be necessary to accomplish the 3 purpose of the appropriations, are appropriated by comprehensive 4 construction programs (hereinafter referred to by the abbreviation CCP), 5 purposes, and projects designated by the appropriations, and authorized 6 to be made available as hereinafter provided to the respective public 7 officers; such appropriations shall be deemed to provide all costs 8 necessary and pertinent to accomplish the intent of the appropriations 9 and are appropriated in accordance with the provisions of section 93 of 10 the state finance law. 11 b) Any amounts specified in this chapter for advances for capital 12 projects, or so much thereof as shall be necessary to accomplish the 13 purpose of the appropriations, are appropriated by comprehensive 14 construction programs (hereinafter referred to by the abbreviation CCP), 15 purposes and projects designated by the appropriations as advances from 16 the capital projects fund in accordance with the provisions of sections 17 40-a and 93 of the state finance law, and are authorized to be paid as 18 hereinafter provided as an advance for a share, part or whole of the 19 cost for such programs, purposes and projects hereinafter specified.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress of Stream Measurements
    Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 166 Series P, Hydrographic Progress Reports, 42 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIKECTOK REPORT PROGRESS OF STREAM MEASUREMENTS FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1905 PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF F. H. NEWELL PART II. Hudson, Passaic, Raritan, and Delaware River Drainages BY R. E. HORTON, N. C. GROVER, and JOHN C. HOYT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1906 Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 166 Series P, HydwgrapMe Progress Reporte, 42 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DlKECTOK REPORT PROGRESS OF STREAM MEASUREMENTS THE CALENDAR YEAR 1905 PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF F. H. NEWELL PART II. Hudson, Passaic, Raritan, and Delaware River Drainages » BY R. E. HORTON, N. C. GROVER, and JOHN C. HOYT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1906 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction......-...-...................___......_.....-.---...-----.-.-- 5 Organization and scope of work.........____...__...-...--....----------- 5 Definitions............................................................ 7 Explanation of tables...............................-..--...------.----- 8 Convenient equivalents.....-......._....____...'.--------.----.--------- 9 Field methods of measuring stream flow................................... 10 Office methods of computing run-off...................................... 14 Cooperation and acknowledgments................--..-...--..-.-....-..- 16 Hudson River drainage basin...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nyrcr Oneida County Recovery
    Page i NY Rising Community Reconstruction Oneida County Committee Name Committee Role Representation/Affiliation Roger Cleveland Co-Chair Retired, Town of New Hartford Cary Flack Co-Chair Retired, Oneida County Planning Department Dave Babowicz (Dennis Committee Oneida County Department of Public Works Davis) Member Nelson Blau Committee Marshall/Oriskany Basin Member Kristin Campbell (John Committee Oneida County Department of Planning Kent) Member Dave Corr Committee Oneida County Sportsmen Club Member Debbie Day Committee City of Utica Member Jim Dowd Committee Town of Augusta Member Chuck Gibbs Committee Town of Whitestown Member Kevin Lewis Committee Oneida County Soil and Water Conservation Member District Gerald Pederson (Kevin Committee Oneida County Emergency Services Revere) Member Jon Scott Committee Town of Kirkland Member Page i Rick Sherman Committee Town of New Hartford Member Matt Wolf Committee Trout Unlimited Member Travis Wright Committee Town of Augusta Member This document was developed by the NYRCR Oneida County Planning Committee as part of the NY Rising Community Reconstruction (NYRCR) Program and is supported by NYS Department of State. The document was prepared by the following consulting firms: Page ii Foreword The NY Rising Community Reconstruction (NYRCR) program was established by Governor Andrew Cuomo to provide additional rebuilding and revitalization assistance to communities severely impacted by Superstorm Sandy, Hurricane Irene, Tropical Storm Lee, and the severe summer storms of 2013. With assistance from the State, communities have been empowered to create and implement local strategies for rebuilding and strengthening their communities against future extreme weather events. By July 2014, plans will be completed in the five upstate counties impacted by severe flooding in 2013: Niagara, Madison, Herkimer, Oneida, and Montgomery counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress of Stream Measurements
    Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 125 Series P, Hydrographic Progress Reports, 30 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR REPORT PROGRESS OF STREAM MEASUREMENTS THE CALENDAR YEAR 1904 PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF F. H. NEWELL BY R. E. HORTON, N. C. GROVER, and JOHN C. HOYT PART II. Hudson, Passaic, Raritan, and Delaware River Drainages WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1905 Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 125 Series P, Hydrographic Progress Reports, 30 i DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR REPORT PROGRESS OF STREAM MEASUREMENTS THE CALENDAR YEAR 1904 PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF F. H. NEWELL BY R. E. HORTON, N. C. GROVER, and JOHN C. HOYT PART II. Hudson, Passaic, Raritan, and Delaware River Drainages WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1905 CONTENTS. Letter of transmittal...................................................... 7 Introduction............................................................. 9 Cooperation and acknowledgments ...... ...^.............................. 18 Hudson Eiver drainage basin. ............................................ 19 Hudson Eiver at Fort Edward, N. Y .............................. 19 Hudson Eiver at Mechanicsville, N. Y............................. 22 Indian Eiver at Indian Lake, Hamilton County, N. Y.............. 24 Hoosic Eiver at Buskirk, N. Y .................................... 24 Mohawk River at Little Falls, N. Y................................ 26 Mohawk Eiver at Dunsbach Ferry Bridge, N. Y.................... 29 Oriskany Creek near Oriskany, N. Y .............................. 32 Starch Factory Creek near New Hartford, N. Y.................... 35 Sylvan Glen Creek near New Hartford, N. Y....................... 37 Graefenberg Creek near New Hartford, N. Y....................... 39 Eeels Creek and Johnston Brook near Deer-field, N. Y.............. 41 Nail Creek at Utica, N. Y......................................... 45 West Canada Creek at Twin Eock Bridge, N. Y...................
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fishing: a Driver for Ecotourism
    New York FRESHWATER April 2019 FISHINGDigest Fishing: A Sport For Everyone NY Fishing 101 page 10 A Female's Guide to Fishing page 30 A summary of 2019–2020 regulations and useful information for New York anglers www.dec.ny.gov Message from the Governor Freshwater Fishing: A Driver for Ecotourism New York State is committed to increasing and supporting a wide array of ecotourism initiatives, including freshwater fishing. Our approach is simple—we are strengthening our commitment to protect New York State’s vast natural resources while seeking compelling ways for people to enjoy the great outdoors in a socially and environmentally responsible manner. The result is sustainable economic activity based on a sincere appreciation of our state’s natural resources and the values they provide. We invite New Yorkers and visitors alike to enjoy our high-quality water resources. New York is blessed with fisheries resources across the state. Every day, we manage and protect these fisheries with an eye to the future. To date, New York has made substantial investments in our fishing access sites to ensure that boaters and anglers have safe and well-maintained parking areas, access points, and boat launch sites. In addition, we are currently investing an additional $3.2 million in waterway access in 2019, including: • New or renovated boat launch sites on Cayuga, Oneida, and Otisco lakes • Upgrades to existing launch sites on Cranberry Lake, Delaware River, Lake Placid, Lake Champlain, Lake Ontario, Chautauqua Lake and Fourth Lake. New York continues to improve and modernize our fish hatcheries. As Governor, I have committed $17 million to hatchery improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the New York State 2010 Section 303(D
    Library Reference 1.2 Summary of the New York State 2010 Section 303(d) List of Impaired Waters Requiring a TMDL/Other Strategy (June, 2010) for Onondaga Lake, Tributaries, and Seneca River. Complete 303(d) list is attached. (Changes from the 2008 List are noted as: Blue = additions; Red = deletions) Water body Type Class Cause/Pollutant Source Year Waterbodies for which TMDL Development May be Deferred (Requiring Verification of Cause/Pollutant): * Seneca River, Lower, Main Stem River C D.O./Oxygen Demand InvSpp, Agric. 1998 (0701-0001) Seneca River, Lower, Main Stem River C D.O./Oxygen Demand InvSpp, Agric. 1998 (0701-0008) Multiple Segment/Categorical Impaired Waterbody Segments (fish consumption): Onondaga Lake, northern end Lake B Dioxin Contam. Sed. 1998 (0702-0003) Mercury Contam. Sed. 1998 PCBs, other toxics Contam. Sed. 1998 Onondaga Lake, southern end Lake C Dioxin Contam. Sed. 1998 (0702-0021)84 Mercury Contam. Sed. 1998 PCBs, other toxics Contam. Sed. 1998 Waterbodies for which TMDL Development May be Deferred (Requiring Verification of Impairment): Seneca River River C Pathogens On-site WTS 1998 (0701-0008) Onondaga Creek, Middle, River B Turbidity Streambank 2008 and tribs (0702-0004) Erosion Onondaga Creek, Upper, and tribs River C Turbidity Streambank 2008 (0702-0024) Erosion Waterbodies for which TMDL Development May be Deferred (Pending Implementation/Evaluation of Other Restoration Measures): Onondaga Lake Outlet102 River B D.O./Oxygen Muni, Urban 2008 (0702-0020) Demand Onondaga Lake, southern end102 Lake C Pathogens
    [Show full text]
  • Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications
    Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Waterbody Type Segment ID Waterbody Index Number (WIN) Streams 0202-0047 Pa-63-30 Streams 0202-0048 Pa-63-33 Streams 0801-0419 Ont 19- 94- 1-P922- Streams 0201-0034 Pa-53-21 Streams 0801-0422 Ont 19- 98 Streams 0801-0423 Ont 19- 99 Streams 0801-0424 Ont 19-103 Streams 0801-0429 Ont 19-104- 3 Streams 0801-0442 Ont 19-105 thru 112 Streams 0801-0445 Ont 19-114 Streams 0801-0447 Ont 19-119 Streams 0801-0452 Ont 19-P1007- Streams 1001-0017 C- 86 Streams 1001-0018 C- 5 thru 13 Streams 1001-0019 C- 14 Streams 1001-0022 C- 57 thru 95 (selected) Streams 1001-0023 C- 73 Streams 1001-0024 C- 80 Streams 1001-0025 C- 86-3 Streams 1001-0026 C- 86-5 Page 1 of 464 09/28/2021 Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Name Description Clear Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Mud Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Tribs to Long Lake total length of all tribs to lake Little Valley Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Elkdale Kents Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Crystal Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Forestport Alder Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Bear Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Minor Tribs to Kayuta Lake total length of select tribs to the lake Little Black Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Wheelertown Twin Lakes Stream and tribs entire stream and tribs Tribs to North Lake total length of all tribs to lake Mill Brook and minor tribs entire stream and selected tribs Riley Brook
    [Show full text]
  • New York State Department of State
    November 25, 2020 DEPARTMENT OF STATE Vol. XLII Division of Administrative Rules Issue 47 NEW YORK STATE REGISTER INSIDE THIS ISSUE: D Inland Trout Stream Fishing Regulations D Minimum Standards for Form, Content, and Sale of Health Insurance, Including Standards of Full and Fair Disclosure D Surge and Flex Health Coordination System Availability of State and Federal Funds Executive Orders Financial Reports State agencies must specify in each notice which proposes a rule the last date on which they will accept public comment. Agencies must always accept public comment: for a minimum of 60 days following publication in the Register of a Notice of Proposed Rule Making, or a Notice of Emergency Adoption and Proposed Rule Making; and for 45 days after publication of a Notice of Revised Rule Making, or a Notice of Emergency Adoption and Revised Rule Making in the Register. When a public hearing is required by statute, the hearing cannot be held until 60 days after publication of the notice, and comments must be accepted for at least 5 days after the last required hearing. When the public comment period ends on a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, agencies must accept comment through the close of business on the next succeeding workday. For notices published in this issue: – the 60-day period expires on January 24, 2021 – the 45-day period expires on January 9, 2021 – the 30-day period expires on December 5, 2020 ANDREW M. CUOMO GOVERNOR ROSSANA ROSADO SECRETARY OF STATE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE For press and media inquiries call: (518) 474-0050 For State Register production, scheduling and subscription information call: (518) 474-6957 E-mail: [email protected] For legal assistance with State Register filing requirements call: (518) 474-6740 E-mail: [email protected] The New York State Register is now available on-line at: www.dos.ny.gov/info/register.htm The New York State Register (ISSN 0197 2472) is published weekly.
    [Show full text]
  • Mud Creek Basin Assessment
    EMERGENCY TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE RECOVERY WATER BASIN ASSESSMENT AND FLOOD HAZARD MITIGATION ALTERNATIVES MUD CREEK ONEIDA COUNTY, NEW YORK April 2014 MMI #5231-01 Photo Source: Milone & MacBroom, Inc. (2013) This document was prepared for the New York State Department of Transportation, in cooperation with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Prepared by: MILONE & MACBROOM, INC. 134 Main Street, Suite A1 New Paltz, NY 12561 (845) 633-8153 www.miloneandmacbroom.com Copyright 2014 Milone & MacBroom, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background .................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Nomenclature ............................................................................................................................ 3 2.0 DATA COLLECTION ....................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Initial Data Collection ............................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Public Outreach ........................................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Field Assessment .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Mohawk River Coliform Bacteria Monitoring Project Report
    New York State DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Division of Water Upper Mohawk River Coliform Bacteria Monitoring Project Portions 12 and 13 in the Utica-Rome Area June 2012 - September 2012 November 2013 (Revised January 2014) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the results of coliform bacteria monitoring conducted by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) from June through September 2012 in portions 12 and 13 of the Mohawk River (see Figure 2). Water sampling was conducted at two stations: Mohawk River in West Schuyler (Portion 12) and Mohawk River near Oriskany (Portion 13). Twenty-two samples per station were collected and analyzed for total and fecal coliform bacteria. Field parameters of dissolved oxygen, specific conductance, pH and temperature were also measured at each station during sampling. Portions 12 and 13 of the Mohawk River are listed in the Final 2012 Section 303(d) List, Part 1 - Individual Waterbody Segments with Impairment Requiring Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development. Pollutants and water quality indicators listed in the Section 303(d) list include floatables (aesthetics), pathogens and dissolved oxygen/oxygen demand. Pollution sources contributing to impairment include Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs), Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSOs), and urban stormwater runoff. The goal of the project was to collect and test samples for coliform frequently enough to satisfy the requirements of New York State Water Quality Standards (at least five samples per month). NYSDEC uses coliform bacteria as an indicator of pathogens. The water quality standard for coliform is based on a minimum of five examinations within a calendar month for Class B and C waterbodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Surface-Water Records
    ~EOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 138 July 1951 INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PART I.-NORTH ATLANTIC SLOPE BASINS TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1950 Prepared by Boston District UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director Washington, 'J. C. Free on application to the Geological Survey, Washington 26, D. C. INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PART 1.-NORTH ATLANTIC SLOPE BASINS TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1950 EXPLANATION The index lists the stream-flow and reservoir stations in the North Atlantic Slope Basins for which records have been or are to be published for periods prior to Sept. 30, 1950. The stations are listed in downstream order. Tributary streams are indicated by indention. Station names are given in their most recently published forms. Parentheses around part of a station name indicate that the inclosed word or words were used in an earlier published name of the station or in a name under which records were published by some agency other than the Geological Survey. The drainage areas, in square miles, are the latest figures pu~lished or otherwise available at this time. Drainage areas that were obviously inconsistent with other drainage areas on the same stream have been omitted. Under "period of record" breaks of less than a 12-month period are not shown. A dash not followed immediately by a closing date shows that the station was in operation on September 30, 1950. The years given are calendar years. Periods·of records published by agencies other than the Geological Survey are listed in parentheses only when they contain more detailed information or are for periods not reported in publications of the Geological Survey.
    [Show full text]