SS and Police Leader Odilo Globocnik and His Staff in the Lublin District

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SS and Police Leader Odilo Globocnik and His Staff in the Lublin District The Austrian Connection: SS and Police Leader Odilo Globocnik and His Staff in the Lublin District Bertrand Perz Institute of Contemporary History, University of Vienna Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/hgs/article/29/3/400/2384537 by guest on 29 September 2021 The Office of the SS and Police Leader in the Lublin District under Odilo Globocnik contributed to two objectives of Nazi rule in Poland: the murder of the Jews and “Germanization.” Globocnik’s enormous activism is often explained by his socialization and the experience of failure as Gauleiter of Vienna. His staff in Lublin has received little attention. Austrians occupied almost all important positions on that staff. Decisive for their recruitment, however, was not their origin but their affiliation with Globocnik’s network when the Nazi movement had been illegal in Austria. These were not just any men, but a group of perpetrators with very close personal and ideologi- cal ties. “The Jews are now being pushed out of the Generalgouvernement, beginning near Lublin, to the East. A pretty barbaric procedure is being applied here and it is not to be described in any more detail, and not much is left of the Jews themselves. In general, one may conclude that 60% of them must be liquidated, while only 40% can be put to work. The former Gauleiter of Vienna, who is carrying out this action, is doing it pretty prudently and with a procedure that doesn’t work too conspicuously.”1 This diary entry by Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels on March 27, 1942, re- ferring to the “evacuation” of the Lublin ghetto in March 1942 and the deportations of the Lublin Jews to the extermination camp of Bełz˙ec, marks the beginning of “Operation Reinhard” in the Generalgouvernement (the largest portion of occupied Poland not incorporated into the Reich). More than 1.5 million Polish Jews were mur- dered in the extermination camps of Bełz˙ec, Sobibór, Treblinka, and Majdanek in the course of this operation. At the very beginning of this mass murder, Goebbels had nothing but praise for the “quite prudent” former Gauleiter of Vienna Odilo Globocnik, SS and Police Leader (SSPF) in the Lublin District since November 1939; the propaganda minister had in mind Globocnik’s organizational talent in mass murder as well as his skillful concealment of the process. The key role of Globocnik, one of the most important Austrian Nazis, is relatively well known. His SSPF Office can be described as well-nigh doi:10.1093/hgs/dcv046 Holocaust and Genocide Studies 29, no. 3 (Winter 2015): 400–430 400 prototypical as an institution seeking to expand its power by garnering new functions and expanding the scope of orders received from Berlin.2 In the scholarly literature, Globocnik’s enormous activity, his radicalism, and his constant transgression of rules and agreements are often explained by personal quali- ties, his socialization in Carinthia—a border region torn by ethnic conflicts—and his experience of failure in Vienna. Globocnik had been forced to step down as Gauleiter there in 1939, leaving behind financial and organizational chaos. This represented a clear career setback for the prominent Austrian, who had played a leading role in the Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/hgs/article/29/3/400/2384537 by guest on 29 September 2021 Anschluss, Germany’s 1938 annexation of Austria. Himmler, who had been very close to Globocnik at least since that time, soon opened up to him a second career opportu- nity in Lublin that Globocnik tried to exploit at all costs. The special status of the Lublin District (districts in occupied Poland were akin to regions elsewhere) for the Nazis’ Judenpolitik, and later as a staging ground and supply base for the war against the Soviet Union, provided Globocnik with a great deal of crea- tive leeway.3 The institution of an SSPF—conceived by Himmler not as a compact, stan- dardized administrative apparatus, but as a flexible instrument of control with open organizational structures—was to be linked to the aggressive personality of the holder of the Office4; it seems to have complemented to a great extent Globocnik’swayof working. Globocnik cast himself as a dynamic and ruthless “man of action” who believed one hundred percent in his mission, which matched what Himmler had in mind. Still, Globocnik had to rely to a large extent on personnel who executed the duties assigned to them. The staff of his SSPF Office was deeply involved in the murder of the European Jews and other ethnic cleansing programs. The role and ac- tivism of that staff deserve greater scholarly attention. Previous scholarly focus on Globocnik as an individual rests to a considerable degree on problematic contempo- rary assessments of him such as that of Maximillian von Herff, chief of the SS-Personalhauptamt (SS Main Personnel Office); per “the Führer principle” Herff praised the SSPF and ascribed to him virtues such as “fanaticism and obsession with his mission.”5 The Führer principle did not countenance the possibility that a group of underlings might shape decisions. But historians can and should recognize that actions ascribed to Globocnik definitely were carried out by a group, albeit a close-knit group who had long known one another and had more than ideological attitudes in common. Most importantly, they shared the experience of underground political ac- tivity while the Nazi Party was banned in Austria from 1933 to 1938. During his entire stay in Lublin (as afterwards), Globocnik moved among a group of close Austrian con- fidants, on both a professional and a private level. Their contribution to the dynamic drive of the Office cannot be underestimated. The objective here is to illuminate the network of personnel around Globocnik. Who were the decisive actors on the staff? How did they wind up in Lublin? What were their relationships to Globocnik? How real was the dominance of Austrians? All of this raises the general question of the selection criteria for the personnel involved The Austrian Connection: SS and Police Leader Odilo Globocnik 401 in the Germans’ crimes in Eastern Europe. Were the men (and women) in the SSPF Office ideologically driven? Or were they “ordinary men” (and women)?6 There are a number of brief biographical accounts of Globocnik, though in-depth monographs about him have flaws.7 Globocnik’s Salzburg-born associate Hermann Höfle, the staff member most responsible for Operation Reinhard, became the subject of scholarly studies when the transcripts of British wiretaps of German radio communications became available.8 One of Höfle’s staff members, Vienna-born Amon Leopold Göth, gained attention through Steven Spielberg’s film “Schindler’s Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/hgs/article/29/3/400/2384537 by guest on 29 September 2021 List” largely due to his later position as the cruel commander of the Plaszow forced labor, and later concentration, camp.9 Legal documents have permitted an awareness of the roles of Georg Michalsen, who was especially active under Höfle in ghetto evac- uations; Richard Thomalla, another Höfle staff associate; and the most important person on the staff, Ernst Lerch.10 Two groups closely connected to Globocnik’s SSPF Office have been thoroughly investigated: personnel from the T4 killing hospi- tals who later were assigned to Globocnik by the Chancellery of the Führer (a total of 120 persons who became core personnel of the extermination camps),11 and several thousand extermination camp guards trained in Trawniki near Lublin, recruited pri- marily from Soviet POWs.12 All in all, however, systematic study of the staff of the SSPF Office has not been carried out.13 Tasks, Structure, and Personnel From the onset of his activity in Lublin, Globocnik and his staff came up with radical measures, especially in the realm of “Jewish policy,” forced labor, and “Germanization.” Specific measures included the establishment of forced labor camps; the construction of fortifications—useless in military terms—on the Bug River; brutal repression by the Lublin Selbstschutz (Volksdeutsche [ethnic German] “self-defense” units);14 and the privileged resettlement of so-called Volksdeutsche, especially from Volhynia. Globocnik struggled with the civilian administration of the district from the beginning, in particular on the issue of competencies over “Jewish matters.”15 As a former Gauleiter, however, Globocnik also laid claim to leadership in the district generally, in principle belonging to the civilian governor, or gouverneur. Globocnik was appointed NSDAP (Nazi Party) district Standortführer in May 1940.16 Globocnik and his staff devised a convincing plan for the establishment of SS- und Polizeistützpunkte (SS and police bases) in the Lublin District, which met with Himmler’s approval. Himmler appointed Globocnik his commissioner for this task in November 1940. At the same time, Globocnik established an SS-Mannschaftshaus (a kind of SS research office) in Lublin, modeled after the ones in German university towns. The idea was to attract young SS academics to Lublin for concrete planning for the bases and later the entire settlement and Germanization projects; he would, thus, have at his disposal his own think tank.17 For the Germanization project, Globocnik relied not only on his role as authorized representative of the Reichskommissar für die Festigung deutschen Volkstums (RKFdV, Reich Commissioner for the Strengthening 402 Holocaust and Genocide Studies of Germandom, Himmler) for Lublin District (in conjunction with his position as SSPF); he also exercised sway over field offices of the Volksdeutsche Mittelstelle (VoMi, Ethnic German Liaison Office) and the Rasse- & Siedlungshauptamt (RuSHA, SS Race and Settlement Main Office) in Lublin, all with close ties to the Forschungsstelle für Ostunterkünfte (Research Center for Settlements in the East), which had emerged from the SS-Mannschaftshaus in March 1942.18 Following the June 22, 1941 attack on the Soviet Union, Himmler expanded Globocnik’s order for the establishment of bases to the entirety of the “new Ostraum Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/hgs/article/29/3/400/2384537 by guest on 29 September 2021 [Eastern territory]”; to this end, the Lublin Standort was to be expanded into a major SS base.
Recommended publications
  • "Justiz Und Erinnerung" 4 / Mai 2001
    Verein Verein zur Erforschung zur Förderung nationalsozialistischer justizgeschichtlicher Gewaltverbrechen und Forschungen ihrer Aufarbeitung A-1013 Wien, Pf. 298 A-1013 Wien, Pf. 298 Tel. 270 68 99, Fax 317 21 12 Tel. 315 4949, Fax 317 21 12 E-Mail: [email protected] oder E-Mail: [email protected] [email protected] Bankverbindung: Bank Austria 660 502 303 Bankverbindung: Bank Austria 660 501 909 JUSTIZ UND ERINNERUNG Hrsg. v. Verein zur Förderung justizgeschichtlicher Forschungen und Verein zur Erforschung nationalsozialistischer Gewaltverbrechen und ihrer Aufarbeitung vormals »Rundbrief« Nr. 4 / Mai 2001 Beiträge Gedenken an die Opfer von Engerau Claudia Kuretsidis-Haider Claudia Kuretsidis-Haider Am 25. Mai 1945 erging bei der Polizei im 3. Wiener Gedenken an die Opfer von Engerau .......... 1 Gemeindebezirk nachstehende »Anzeige gegen An- gehörige der SA im Judenlager Engerau«: Peter Gstettner »Als die SA das Judenlager in Engerau errich- Das KZ in der Lendorfer Kaserne tete, wurden ca. 2000 Juden (ungarische) in vor den Toren der Stadt Klagenfurt. das genannte Lager aufgenommen. An den Ju- Ein Vorschlag zur Geschichts- den wurden folgende Gewalttaten verübt: An- aufarbeitung und Erinnerung ................ 3 lässlich des Abmarsches Ende April 1945 aus dem Lager in der Richtung nach Deutsch Al- tenburg wurde ich als Wegführer bestimmt und Meinhard Brunner ging an der Spitze des Zuges. Hinter mir fand Ermittlungs- und Prozessakten eine wüste Schießerei statt bei der 102 Juden britischer Militärgerichte in Österreich den Tod fanden.« im Public Record Office ................... 12 Ein weiterer SA-Mann präzisierte diese Angaben: »Vom Ortskommandanten erhielt ich den Be- Sabine Loitfellner fehl alle Juden welche den Marsch nicht Arisierungen während der NS-Zeit durchhalten zu erschießen.
    [Show full text]
  • From Complaisance to Collaboration: Analyzing Citizensâ•Ž Motives Near
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Proceedings of the Tenth Annual MadRush MAD-RUSH Undergraduate Research Conference Conference: Best Papers, Spring 2019 From Complaisance to Collaboration: Analyzing Citizens’ Motives Near Concentration and Extermination Camps During the Holocaust Jordan Green Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/madrush Part of the European History Commons, and the Holocaust and Genocide Studies Commons Green, Jordan, "From Complaisance to Collaboration: Analyzing Citizens’ Motives Near Concentration and Extermination Camps During the Holocaust" (2019). MAD-RUSH Undergraduate Research Conference. 1. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/madrush/2019/holocaust/1 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conference Proceedings at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in MAD-RUSH Undergraduate Research Conference by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. From Complaisance to Collaboration: Analyzing Citizens’ Motives Near Concentration and Extermination Camps During the Holocaust Jordan Green History 395 James Madison University Spring 2018 Dr. Michael J. Galgano The Holocaust has raised difficult questions since its end in April 1945 including how could such an atrocity happen and how could ordinary people carry out a policy of extermination against a whole race? To answer these puzzling questions, most historians look inside the Nazi Party to discern the Holocaust’s inner-workings: official decrees and memos against the Jews and other untermenschen1, the role of the SS, and the organization and brutality within concentration and extermination camps. However, a vital question about the Holocaust is missing when examining these criteria: who was watching? Through research, the local inhabitants’ knowledge of a nearby concentration camp, extermination camp or mass shooting site and its purpose was evident and widespread.
    [Show full text]
  • Camilla Da Dalt, the Case of Morpurgo De Nilma's Art Collection in Trieste
    STUDI DI MEMOFONTE Rivista on-line semestrale Numero 22/2019 FONDAZIONE MEMOFONTE Studio per l’elaborazione informatica delle fonti storico-artistiche www.memofonte.it COMITATO REDAZIONALE Proprietario Fondazione Memofonte onlus Fondatrice Paola Barocchi Direzione scientifica Donata Levi Comitato scientifico Francesco Caglioti, Barbara Cinelli, Flavio Fergonzi, Margaret Haines, Donata Levi, Nicoletta Maraschio, Carmelo Occhipinti Cura scientifica Daria Brasca, Christian Fuhrmeister, Emanuele Pellegrini Cura redazionale Martina Nastasi, Laurence Connell Segreteria di redazione Fondazione Memofonte onlus, via de’ Coverelli 2/4, 50125 Firenze [email protected] ISSN 2038-0488 INDICE The Transfer of Jewish-owned Cultural Objects in the Alpe Adria Region DARIA BRASCA, CHRISTIAN FUHRMEISTER, EMANUELE PELLEGRINI Introduction p. 1 VICTORIA REED Museum Acquisitions in the Era of the Washington Principles: Porcelain from the Emma Budge Estate p. 9 GISÈLE LÉVY Looting Jewish Heritage in the Alpe Adria Region. Findings from the Union of the Italian Jewish Communities (UCEI) Historical Archives p. 28 IVA PASINI TRŽEC Contentious Musealisation Process(es) of Jewish Art Collections in Croatia p. 41 DARIJA ALUJEVIĆ Jewish-owned Art Collections in Zagreb: The Destiny of the Robert Deutsch Maceljski Collection p. 50 ANTONIJA MLIKOTA The Destiny of the Tilla Durieux Collection after its Transfer from Berlin to Zagreb p. 64 DARIA BRASCA The Dispossession of Italian Jews: the Fate of Cultural Property in the Alpe Adria Region during Second World War p. 79 CAMILLA DA DALT The Case of Morpurgo De Nilma’s Art Collection in Trieste: from a Jewish Legacy to a ‘German Donation’ p. 107 CRISTINA CUDICIO The Dissolution of a Jewish Collection: the Pincherle Family in Trieste p.
    [Show full text]
  • ALF LÜDTKE Explaining Forced Migration
    ALF LÜDTKE Explaining Forced Migration in RICHARD BESSEL AND CLAUDIA B. HAAKE (eds.), Removing Peoples. Forced Removal in the Modern World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009) pp. 13–32 ISBN: 978 0 199 56195 7 The following PDF is published under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND licence. Anyone may freely read, download, distribute, and make the work available to the public in printed or electronic form provided that appropriate credit is given. However, no commercial use is allowed and the work may not be altered or transformed, or serve as the basis for a derivative work. The publication rights for this volume have formally reverted from Oxford University Press to the German Historical Institute London. All reasonable effort has been made to contact any further copyright holders in this volume. Any objections to this material being published online under open access should be addressed to the German Historical Institute London. DOI: 2 Explaining Forced Migration ALF LODTKE Practices: 'How did (s)he do it?' The desire to find explanations for the 'doings' of historical actors apparently resonates with the 'extremes' that millions of people encountered during the twentieth century.' Such desire obviously sparks the continuous interest if not obsession both of the historical profession and the wider public in finding, for instance, 'the one and only' document that contains the order for exterminating European Jewry, signed by Hitler or one of his paladins. From here, so the internal logic seems to go, one could pursue the events down the 'line of command', not least the forced migration of the related deportations, and their fit to this man-made catastrophe.
    [Show full text]
  • Running Head: the TRAGEDY of DEPORTATION 1
    Running head: THE TRAGEDY OF DEPORTATION 1 The Tragedy of Deportation An Analysis of Jewish Survivor Testimony on Holocaust Train Deportations Connor Schonta A Senior Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation in the Honors Program Liberty University Spring 2016 THE TRAGEDY OF DEPORTATION 2 Acceptance of Senior Honors Thesis This Senior Honors Thesis is accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation from the Honors Program of Liberty University. ______________________________ David Snead, Ph.D. Thesis Chair ______________________________ Christopher Smith, Ph.D. Committee Member ______________________________ Mark Allen, Ph.D. Committee Member ______________________________ Brenda Ayres, Ph.D. Honors Director ______________________________ Date THE TRAGEDY OF DEPORTATION 3 Abstract Over the course of World War II, trains carried three million Jews to extermination centers. The deportation journey was an integral aspect of the Nazis’ Final Solution and the cause of insufferable torment to Jewish deportees. While on the trains, Jews endured an onslaught of physical and psychological misery. Though most Jews were immediately killed upon arriving at the death camps, a small number were chosen to work, and an even smaller number survived through liberation. The basis of this study comes from the testimonies of those who survived, specifically in regard to their recorded experiences and memories of the deportation journey. This study first provides a brief account of how the Nazi regime moved from methods of emigration and ghettoization to systematic deportation and genocide. Then, the deportation journey will be studied in detail, focusing on three major themes of survivor testimony: the physical conditions, the psychological turmoil, and the chaos of arrival.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Reinhard: Death Camps What’S Included
    World War Two Tours Operation Reinhard: Death Camps What’s included: Hotel Bed & Breakfast All transport from the official overseas start point Accompanied for the trip duration All Museum entrances All Expert Talks & Guidance Low Group Numbers “Amazing time, one of those ‘once in a life time trips’. WelI organised, very interesting and thoroughly enjoyable. I would recommend the trip to any enthusiast.” Operation Reinhard (German: Aktion Reinhard or Einsatz Reinhard) was the code name given to the Nazi plan to murder Polish Jews in the General Government, and marked the most deadly phase of the Holocaust, the use of extermination camps. During the operation, as many as two Military History Tours is all about the ‘experience’. Naturally we take million people were murdered in Bełżec, Sobibor and Treblinka, almost all of whom were Jews. care of all local accommodation, transport and entrances but what By 1942, the Nazis had decided to undertake the Final Solution. sets us aside is our on the ground knowledge and contacts, established This led to the establishment of camps such as Bełżec, over many, many years that enable you to really get under the surface of Sobibor and Treblinka which had the express purpose of killing your chosen subject matter. thousands of people quickly and efficiently. These sites differed By guiding guests around these from those such as Auschwitz-Birkenau and Majdanek because historic locations we feel we are contributing greatly towards ‘keeping they also operated as forced-labour camps, these were purely the spirit alive’ of some of the most killing factories. The organizational apparatus behind the memorable events in human history.
    [Show full text]
  • Guides to German Records Microfilmed at Alexandria, Va
    GUIDES TO GERMAN RECORDS MICROFILMED AT ALEXANDRIA, VA. No. 32. Records of the Reich Leader of the SS and Chief of the German Police (Part I) The National Archives National Archives and Records Service General Services Administration Washington: 1961 This finding aid has been prepared by the National Archives as part of its program of facilitating the use of records in its custody. The microfilm described in this guide may be consulted at the National Archives, where it is identified as RG 242, Microfilm Publication T175. To order microfilm, write to the Publications Sales Branch (NEPS), National Archives and Records Service (GSA), Washington, DC 20408. Some of the papers reproduced on the microfilm referred to in this and other guides of the same series may have been of private origin. The fact of their seizure is not believed to divest their original owners of any literary property rights in them. Anyone, therefore, who publishes them in whole or in part without permission of their authors may be held liable for infringement of such literary property rights. Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 58-9982 AMERICA! HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE fOR THE STUDY OP WAR DOCUMENTS GUIDES TO GERMAN RECOBDS MICROFILMED AT ALEXAM)RIA, VA. No* 32» Records of the Reich Leader of the SS aad Chief of the German Police (HeiehsMhrer SS und Chef der Deutschen Polizei) 1) THE AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION (AHA) COMMITTEE FOR THE STUDY OF WAE DOCUMENTS GUIDES TO GERMAN RECORDS MICROFILMED AT ALEXANDRIA, VA* This is part of a series of Guides prepared
    [Show full text]
  • The Germans: "An Antisemitic People” the Press Campaign After 9 November 1938 Herbert Obenhaus
    The Germans: "An Antisemitic People” The Press Campaign After 9 November 1938 Herbert Obenhaus The pogrom of 9-10 November 1938 gave rise to a variety of tactical and strategic considerations by the German government and National Socialist party offices. The discussions that took place in the Ministry of Propaganda - which in some respects played a pivotal role in the events, due largely to its minister, Josef Goebbels - were of particular significance. On the one hand, the ministry was obliged to document the "wrath of the people" following the assassination of Ernst vom Rath; on the other hand, it was also responsible for manipulating the population by influencing the press and molding opinion. Concerning the events themselves, the main issue was what kind of picture the press was conveying to both a national and an international readership. In the ministry, this prompted several questions: Could it be satisfied with the reactions of the population to vom Rath's murder? What explanation could be given for the people's obvious distance to the events surrounding 9 November? Should the press make greater efforts to influence the opinions prevalent among the population? Should special strategies for the press be developed and pursued after 9 November 1938? Moreover, since the pogrom proved to be a turning point in the regime's policies towards German Jews and marked the beginning of a qualitative change, how should the press react to these changes ? Press activity was also conducted on a second level, that of the NSDAP, which had its own press service, the Nationalsozialistische Partei- Korrespondenz (NSK).1 As was the case with Goebbels' ministry, the 1 It was published in 1938 with the publisher's information, "Commissioned by Wilhelm Weiss responsible for the reports from the Reichspressestelle: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Nurses and Midwives in Nazi Germany
    Downloaded by [New York University] at 03:18 04 October 2016 Nurses and Midwives in Nazi Germany This book is about the ethics of nursing and midwifery, and how these were abrogated during the Nazi era. Nurses and midwives actively killed their patients, many of whom were disabled children and infants and patients with mental (and other) illnesses or intellectual disabilities. The book gives the facts as well as theoretical perspectives as a lens through which these crimes can be viewed. It also provides a way to teach this history to nursing and midwifery students, and, for the first time, explains the role of one of the world’s most historically prominent midwifery leaders in the Nazi crimes. Downloaded by [New York University] at 03:18 04 October 2016 Susan Benedict is Professor of Nursing, Director of Global Health, and Co- Director of the Campus-Wide Ethics Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center School of Nursing in Houston. Linda Shields is Professor of Nursing—Tropical Health at James Cook Uni- versity, Townsville, Queensland, and Honorary Professor, School of Medi- cine, The University of Queensland. Routledge Studies in Modern European History 1 Facing Fascism 9 The Russian Revolution of 1905 The Conservative Party and the Centenary Perspectives European dictators 1935–1940 Edited by Anthony Heywood and Nick Crowson Jonathan D. Smele 2 French Foreign and Defence 10 Weimar Cities Policy, 1918–1940 The Challenge of Urban The Decline and Fall of a Great Modernity in Germany Power John Bingham Edited by Robert Boyce 11 The Nazi Party and the German 3 Britain and the Problem of Foreign Office International Disarmament Hans-Adolf Jacobsen and Arthur 1919–1934 L.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychiatry, Genocide and the National Socialist State: Lessons Learnt, Ignored and Forgotten
    This is the final peer-reviewed, accepted manuscript of a book chapter published in [Marczac N and Shields K (eds). Genocide Perspectives V] in 2017, available online at https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/books/genocide- perspectives-v Self-archived in the Sydney eScholarship Repository by Sydney Health Ethics (SHE), University of Sydney, Australia Please cite as: Robertson M., Light, E., Lipworth W, Walter, G. 2017. Psychiatry, genocide and the National Socialist State: lessons learnt, ignored and forgotten. In Marczac N and Shields K (eds). Genocide Perspectives V. pp69-89. Australia: UTS ePRESS. Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Non Derivatives License CC BY-NC-ND http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Psychiatry, genocide and the National Socialist State: lessons learnt, ignored and forgotten Robertson M., Light, E., Lipworth W, Walter, G. 2017 Authors: Associate Professor Michael Robertson, Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, [email protected] Dr Edwina Light, Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, [email protected] Dr Wendy Lipworth, Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, [email protected] Professor Garry Walter, Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, [email protected] Introduction The genocide of European Jews perpetrated by the National Socialist (Nazi) regime in Germany and its satellites was a distinctly modern event. The bureaucratised and industrialised nature of the Nazi plan (the Endlösung or Final Solution) is generally considered the defining characteristic of the Nazi regime’s genocide.
    [Show full text]
  • Nazi Concentration Camp Guard Service Equals "Good Moral Character"?: United States V
    American University International Law Review Volume 12 | Issue 1 Article 3 1997 Nazi Concentration Camp Guard Service Equals "Good Moral Character"?: United States v. Lindert K. Lesli Ligomer Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Ligorner, K. Lesli. "Nazi Concentration Camp Guard Service Equals "Good Moral Character"?: United States v. Lindert." American University International Law Review 12, no. 1 (1997): 145-193. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NAZI CONCENTRATION CAMP GUARD SERVICE EQUALS "GOODMORAL CHARACTER"?: UNITED STATES V. LINDERT By K Lesli Ligorner Fetching the newspaper from your porch, you look up and wave at your elderly neighbor across the street. This quiet man emigrated to the United States from Europe in the 1950s. Upon scanning the newspaper, you discover his picture on the front page and a story revealing that he guarded a notorious Nazi concen- tration camp. How would you react if you knew that this neighbor became a natu- ralized citizen in 1962 and that naturalization requires "good moral character"? The systematic persecution and destruction of innocent peoples from 1933 until 1945 remains a dark chapter in the annals of twentieth century history. Though the War Crimes Trials at Nilnberg' occurred over fifty years ago, the search for those who participated in Nazi-sponsored persecution has not ended.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NAZI ANTI-URBAN UTOPIA Generalplan Ost
    MONOGRAPH Mètode Science Studies Journal, 10 (2020): 165-171. University of Valencia. DOI: 10.7203/metode.10.13009 ISSN: 2174-3487. eISSN: 2174-9221. Submitted: 03/09/2018. Approved: 11/03/2019. THE NAZI ANTI-URBAN UTOPIA Generalplan Ost UNAI FERNÁNDEZ DE BETOÑO Nazi Germany saw Eastern Europe as an opportunity to expand its territory, its living space. Poland would become the laboratory for an inhumane colonisation plan, the Generalplan Ost (“General Plan for the East”), which involved replacement of the non-Aryan population with Germanic farmers. The anti-urban management of that lobotomised territory was scientifically drafted by a group of architects, geographers, and agronomists working under the orders of Heinrich Himmler. The urban planning aspects of this utopian plan, based on central place theory, self-sufficiency, and neighbourhood units, were of great technical interest and influenced the creation of new communities within Franco’s regime. However, we cannot overlook the fact that, had the Nazi plan been completed, it would have resulted in the forced relocation of 31 million Europeans. Keywords: Nazi Germany, Generalplan Ost, land management, colonisation, urban planning. ■ INTRODUCTION for the colonisation of the Eastern territories, mainly the land occupied in Poland between 1939 and 1945. The fields of urban planning and land management The Nazi colonisation of Poland, both in territories have historically focused on significantly different annexed by the Third Reich and those in the objectives depending on the authors of each plan and Generalgouvernement, was a testing ground for land when they were created. Some have given greater management and was understood as a scientific and prominence to the artistic components of urban technical discipline.
    [Show full text]