Explanatory Note Template for Word 8

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Explanatory Note Template for Word 8 These notes refer to the Co-operative and Community Benefit Societies and Credit Unions Bill as introduced in the House of Commons on 21 January 2009 [Bill 14] CO-OPERATIVE AND COMMUNITY BENEFIT SOCIETIES AND CREDIT UNIONS BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES INTRODUCTION 1. These explanatory notes relate to the Co-operative and Community Benefit Societies and Credit Unions Bill, as introduced in the House of Commons on 21 January 2009. They have been prepared by HM Treasury, with the consent of Malcolm Wicks MP, the Member sponsoring the Bill, in order to assist the reader of the Bill and to help inform debate on it. 2. These notes need to be read in conjunction with the Bill. They are not, and are not meant to be, a comprehensive description of the Bill. So where a clause or part of a clause does not seem to require any explanation or comment, none is given. TERRITORIAL EXTENT AND APPLICATION 3. The Bill extends to Great Britain only, with a power to extend certain provisions by Order in Council to the Channel Islands. HM Treasury have sought the consent of the authorities in the Channel Islands to the extension provision and final confirmation of the position is awaited. 4. There are no devolution issues affecting the Scottish Executive because the Bill covers matters reserved to Westminster under the Scotland Act 1998. 5. Industrial and provident societies in Northern Ireland are governed by their own legislation and the Bill does not extend to Northern Ireland. However, the Bill does contain a power to make consequential amendments to enactments, including those that extend to Northern Ireland. Bill 14─EN 54/4 1 These notes refer to the Co-operative and Community Benefit Societies and Credit Unions Bill as introduced in the House of Commons on 21 January 2009 [Bill 14] SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND 6. The Bill was introduced by Malcolm Wicks MP as a Private Member’s Bill on 21 January 2009. The clauses were prepared by the Government on Mr Wicks’ behalf. 7. The purpose of the Bill is to introduce certain reforms to the law of industrial and provident societies. 8. Industrial and provident societies are mutual societies. The main statute on industrial and provident societies is the Industrial and Provident Societies Act 1965 (the “1965 Act”). There are also a number of other Acts relevant to industrial and provident societies (together with the 1965 Act, the “Industrial and Provident Societies Acts”)1. 9. The reforms introduced by the Bill are: to require new industrial and provident societies (other than credit unions) to be registered as co-operative or community benefit societies; to re-name the Industrial and Provident Societies Acts; to apply the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 to industrial and provident societies; to give the Treasury powers to apply to industrial and provident societies, with appropriate modifications, company law on investigation of companies, company names and dissolution and restoration to the register; and to give the Treasury powers to make provisions for credit unions corresponding to any provisions applying to building societies. 10. A number of these reforms were consulted upon in a public consultation “Review of the GB cooperative and credit union legislation”, carried out by the Government from 21 June to 12 September 2007. The proposals received the support of the sector. The consultation, together with a summary of responses and the Government’s response, are published on HM Treasury’s website (www.hm- treasury.gov.uk). 1 The Acts are the Industrial and Provident Societies Acts 1965, 1967, 1975, 1978 and 2002; the Friendly and Industrial and Provident Societies Act 1968, and the Co-operatives and Community Benefit Societies Act 2003. 2 These notes refer to the Co-operative and Community Benefit Societies and Credit Unions Bill as introduced in the House of Commons on 21 January 2009 [Bill 14] 11. The Bill will introduce certain changes that will lead to the replacement of the expression “industrial and provident society” with the expression “co-operative society” in various parts of the statute book. The reason for this change is that the expression “industrial and provident society” is now widely perceived as old- fashioned whilst the expression “co-operative society” is more modern and more widely used. 12. At present, there is no statutory requirement for an industrial and provident society to register with the FSA (which is the registrar of such societies.) The 1965 Act states that societies “may” be registered. It should be noted that there is to be no change to the provisions governing registration of credit unions. The Bill will amend the 1965 Act so that new societies will be required to register as either a co-operative society or a community benefit society. The 1965 Act gives only limited recognition to the concepts of “co-operative society” and “community benefit society”, which together with credit unions are now commonly used to describe relevant descriptions of societies. 13. To reflect the new requirement to register as co-operative or community benefit societies, the Bill will change the name of the Industrial and Provident Societies Acts. The terms “co-operative and community benefit societies”, and where appropriate “credit unions”, will appear in the short titles of those Acts. 14. The Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 provides for the disqualification of officers of companies and various other bodies when such officers have seriously mismanaged those bodies. Disqualification means being prohibited for a period of time from being a director or otherwise being involved in the management of a company or other body or from acting as an insolvency practitioner. 15. The Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 does not currently apply to industrial and provident societies, although it applies to other mutuals, such as building societies and friendly societies, and to Northern Ireland industrial and provident societies. 16. The Bill will amend the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 to apply it to industrial and provident societies. The aim of this is to bring this aspect of the corporate governance of industrial and provident societies in line with companies and other mutual societies. 17. The Bill gives the Treasury powers to apply Parts 14 and 15 of the Companies Act 1985 and Parts 5 and 31 of the Companies Act 2006 to industrial and provident societies, with appropriate modifications. Those Parts concern investigations, company names, and dissolution and restoration to the register. The general aim of the application to industrial and provident societies of this company legislation is to modernise some aspects of the law of industrial and provident societies by bringing it in line with company law. This approach will enable the Treasury to consult 3 These notes refer to the Co-operative and Community Benefit Societies and Credit Unions Bill as introduced in the House of Commons on 21 January 2009 [Bill 14] industrial and provident societies and other interested parties on the detailed regulations that are likely to be required before making any substantive changes to the legislation. 18. The Bill gives the Treasury the power to apply to credit unions any enactment applying to building societies. This would allow changes to be made to bring credit union law in line with building society law on specific issues. A number of provisions of the Building Societies Act 1986 deal with issues specific to institutions which accept deposits and could be relevant to credit unions. These include requirements to provide a summary financial statement to members and depositors, audit and accounts requirements, rules on electronic voting, issues relating to directors and governance matters and duty to disclose interests, ownership of subsidiaries and prohibition on floating charges and restrictions on dealing in derivatives and certain other financial instruments. COMMENTARY ON CLAUSES Clause 1: Registration of societies as co-operative or community benefit societies 19. Subsection (1) replaces section 1 of the 1965 Act with revised provisions requiring all new societies registered under the Act, other than credit unions, to be registered by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) as co-operatives or community benefit societies. The FSA is the registrar for industrial and provident societies. Subsection (1) also sets out the basis on which societies may be registered, re- enacting the existing subsection (1). 20. Subsection (2) inserts into the 1965 Act a new section 4A, which deals with the treatment of those societies registered, or treated as registered, under the “old” section 1 of the 1965 Act (section 1 as it stands at present). These societies did not have to register as a particular type of society. 21. Subsections (3) and (4) amend section 16 of the 1965 Act, which deals with circumstances in which a society’s registration may be cancelled, so that it will reflect the registration provisions inserted into the 1965 Act by subsection (1). Subsection (4) inserts into Section 16 of the Act a new subsection (1A), permitting the FSA, as registrar, to cancel the registration of a society where it does not meet the statutory definitions set out in new section 1(2) and new 1(3) to be inserted by subsection (1). Again the status of societies registered, or treated as registered, under the “old” section 1 of the 1965 Act is dealt with, at new section 16(1A)(c). Pre-2009 Act societies are not to be affected by the definitions of “co-operative society” or “community benefit society” inserted by subsection (1) of this Bill. 4 These notes refer to the Co-operative and Community Benefit Societies and Credit Unions Bill as introduced in the House of Commons on 21 January 2009 [Bill 14] 22. Subsection (5) makes an additional amendment to the 1965 Act, ensuring that the definition of a “pre-2009 Act” society” reflects that inserted into the Act by clause 1(2).
Recommended publications
  • Companies Act 2006, Part 1 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 19 August 2021
    Changes to legislation: Companies Act 2006, Part 1 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 19 August 2021. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) View outstanding changes Companies Act 2006 2006 CHAPTER 46 PART 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Pts. 1-39 modified (31.12.2020) by Regulation (EC) No. 2157/2001, Art. AAA1(3) (as inserted by The European Public Limited-Liability Company (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1298), regs. 1, 97 (with regs. 140-145) (as amended by S.I. 2020/523, regs. 1(2), 5(a)-(f)); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)) C2 Pts. 1-39 (except for Pt. 7 and ss. 662-669), 45-47 extended (12.5.2011) by The Companies Act 2006 (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Order 2011 (S.I. 2011/1265), art. 5(1), Sch. 1 para. 2 Companies and Companies Acts 1 Companies (1) In the Companies Acts, unless the context otherwise requires— “company” means a company formed and registered under this Act, that is— (a) a company so formed and registered after the commencement of this Part, or (b) a company that immediately before the commencement of this Part— (i) was formed and registered under the Companies Act 1985 (c. 6) or the Companies (Northern Ireland) Order 1986 (S.I. 1986/1032 (N.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr Stephen Copp and Alison Cronin, 'The Failure of Criminal Law To
    Dr Stephen Copp and Alison Cronin, ‘The Failure of Criminal Law to Control the Use of Off Balance Sheet Finance During the Banking Crisis’ (2015) 36 The Company Lawyer, Issue 4, 99, reproduced with permission of Thomson Reuters (Professional) UK Ltd. This extract is taken from the author’s original manuscript and has not been edited. The definitive, published, version of record is available here: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad8289e0000014eca3cbb3f02 6cd4c4&docguid=I83C7BE20C70F11E48380F725F1B325FB&hitguid=I83C7BE20C70F11 E48380F725F1B325FB&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=25&crumb- action=append&context=6&resolvein=true THE FAILURE OF CRIMINAL LAW TO CONTROL THE USE OF OFF BALANCE SHEET FINANCE DURING THE BANKING CRISIS Dr Stephen Copp & Alison Cronin1 30th May 2014 Introduction A fundamental flaw at the heart of the corporate structure is the scope for fraud based on the provision of misinformation to investors, actual or potential. The scope for fraud arises because the separation of ownership and control in the company facilitates asymmetric information2 in two key circumstances: when a company seeks to raise capital from outside investors and when a company provides information to its owners for stewardship purposes.3 Corporate misinformation, such as the use of off balance sheet finance (OBSF), can distort the allocation of investment funding so that money gets attracted into less well performing enterprises (which may be highly geared and more risky, enhancing the risk of multiple failures). Insofar as it creates a market for lemons it risks damaging confidence in the stock markets themselves since the essence of a market for lemons is that bad drives out good from the market, since sellers of the good have less incentive to sell than sellers of the bad.4 The neo-classical model of perfect competition assumes that there will be perfect information.
    [Show full text]
  • The Companies Act 1985 and the Companies Act 2006 Nla
    THE COMPANIES ACT 1985 AND THE COMPANIES ACT 2006 NLA MEDIA ACCESS LIMITED ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION* *Amended by special resolution passed on 17 November 2009 TABLE A 1. The regulations contained in Table A in the Schedule to the Companies (Tables A to F) Regulations 1985 as amended at the date of adoption of these Articles ("Table A") shall, except where the same are excluded or varied by or inconsistent with these Articles, apply to the Company to the exclusion of all other regulations set out in any statute or statutory instrument concerning companies. INTERPRETATION 2. In these Articles unless the context otherwise requires: "2006 Act" means the Companies Act 2006; "these Articles" means these Articles of Association in their present form or as from time to time altered; "body corporate" shall bear the same meaning as in Section 740 of the Companies Act 1985; "the Companies Acts" means every statute from time to time in force concerning companies insofar as the same applies to the Company; a "director" includes an A director appointed as such under Article 16, a B director appointed as such pursuant to Article 17 and the special contributors' director appointed as such pursuant to Article 18 but does not include an alternate director unless specifically stated in these Articles or the Companies Acts; "eligible person" means a newspaper proprietor or such other company (as that expression is defined in section 735(1)(a) of the Companies Act 1985) as may be determined to be eligible by written consent of all members for the time being;
    [Show full text]
  • Company Law I 2008 - 2009
    1 COMPANY LAW I 2008 - 2009 SEMESTER ONE - LECTURE OUTLINE I AN OVERVIEW OF OUR COMPANY LAW COURSE Semester One: . Choice of Business Organisation & Company Registration . Separate Corporate Legal Personality . Corporate Governance: Distribution of power between board of directors and shareholders’ general meeting and executives and non executive directors . Directors’ Duties . Minority Shareholder Protection Semester Two . Agency and Company Capacity: Who can bind the Company to a Contract, or make it liable in Tort or Criminal Law? . Capital – shares, loans, and markets in shares. Take-overs and Mergers of PLC’s . Insolvency and Dissolution of Companies: especially liability of directors. Choice of Business Structure Aim: o To set the context and help you to understand the key features of the main structures and issues in choosing between business structures. Reading: Davies and Gower, Chapters 1 & 2 Hicks and Goo 6th edition pp 33-77 gives an idea of the development of a business – especially the story on pages 33-40. Pages 41-77 provide the relevant documents for the company in the story. Pages 91-94 outline some of the choices for those setting up a small business. See G. Morse, Partnership Law (Blackstone) 6th Edition (2006) chapters 1 and 9 for a little more detail on partnerships. Blackett Ord Partnership, Butterworths, 2002 Chapter 1 pp 1-5; Chap 2 pp 10-34 & Chapter 10, 11, 16, 20 & 21 is good for reference or if you are particularly interested in going more deeply into partnership law. NOTE: Companies Act 2006 changes the documentation of company constitutions. It makes the Memorandum of Association a document with few details in it which is lodged when the company is registered.
    [Show full text]
  • The Companies Act 1985 and the Companies Act 2006 ______
    THE COMPANIES ACT 1985 AND THE COMPANIES ACT 2006 __________ A COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE AND NOT HAVING A SHARE CAPITAL __________ ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF CAMBRIDGE WIRELESS LIMITED ___________ PRELIMINARY 1. The regulations contained in Table A in the Schedule to the Companies (Tables A to F) Regulations 1985 as amended by the Companies (Tables A to F) (Amendment) Regulations 1985, the Companies Act 1985 (Electronic Communications) Order 2000, the Companies (Tables A to F) (Amendment) Regulations 2007 and the Companies (Tables A to F) (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2007 do not apply to the company. 2. In these articles — “the Act” means the Companies Act 1985 including any statutory modification or re- enactment thereof for the time being in force and any provisions of the Companies Act 2006 for the time being in force. “the articles” means the articles of the company. "the Company" means Cambridge Wireless Limited. “clear days” in relation to the period of a notice means that period excluding the day when the notice is given or deemed to be given and the day for which it is given or on which it is to take effect. "communication" means the same as in the Electronic Communications Act 2000. "electronic communication" means the same as in the Electronic Communications Act 2000. “executed” includes any mode of execution. "guarantor" means those individuals, companies or organisations that have agreed in writing to contribute £1 towards the liabilities of the company. “office” means the registered office of the company. “secretary” means the secretary of the company or any other person appointed to perform the duties of the secretary of the company, including a joint, assistant or deputy secretary.
    [Show full text]
  • 99577 County Intro.Qxp
    THIS DOCUMENT IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. If you are in any doubt about the contents of this document or the action you should take, you should immediately consult a person authorised under FSMA who specialises in advising on the acquisition of shares and other securities. This document, which constitutes an AIM admission document, has been drawn up in accordance with the AIM Rules for Companies. Application will be made to London Stock Exchange plc for the whole of the issued share capital of Impellam to be admitted to trading on AIM. It is expected that Admission will become effective and that trading in Impellam Shares will commence on AIM at 8.00 a.m. on 7 May 2008. AIM is a market designed primarily for emerging or smaller companies to which a higher investment risk tends to be attached than to larger or more established companies. A prospective investor should be aware of the risks in investing in such companies and should make the decision to invest only after careful consideration and, if appropriate, consultation with an independent financial adviser. Each AIM company is required pursuant to the AIM Rules for Companies to have a nominated adviser. The nominated adviser is required to make a declaration to the London Stock Exchange on Admission in the form set out in Schedule Two to the AIM Rules for Nominated Advisers. The AIM Rules for Companies are less demanding than those of the Official List. AIM securities are not admitted to the Official List and it is emphasised that no application is being made for admission of Impellam Shares to the Official List or any other recognised investment exchange and no application has been or is being made for Impellam Shares to be admitted to trading on any such exchange.
    [Show full text]
  • Rise and Fall of the Ultra Vires Doctrine in United States, United Kingdom, and Commonwealth Caribbean Corporate Common Law: a Triumph of Experience Over Logic
    DePaul Business and Commercial Law Journal Volume 5 Issue 1 Fall 2006 Article 4 Rise and Fall of the Ultra Vires Doctrine in United States, United Kingdom, and Commonwealth Caribbean Corporate Common Law: A Triumph of Experience Over Logic Stephen J. Leacock Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/bclj Recommended Citation Stephen J. Leacock, Rise and Fall of the Ultra Vires Doctrine in United States, United Kingdom, and Commonwealth Caribbean Corporate Common Law: A Triumph of Experience Over Logic, 5 DePaul Bus. & Com. L.J. 67 (2006) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/bclj/vol5/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Business and Commercial Law Journal by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Rise and Fall of the Ultra Vires Doctrine in United States, United Kingdom, and Commonwealth Caribbean Corporate Common Law: A Triumph of Experience Over Logic Stephen J.Leacock* "Pure logical thinking cannot yield us any knowledge of the empiri- cal world; all knowledge of reality starts from experience and ends in it."1 2 I. INTRODUCTION In free market3 economies, corporate laws change over time. More- over, experience has taught us that some legislative enactments, when * Professor of Law, Barry University School of Law. Barrister (Hons.) 1972, Middle Temple, London; LL.M. 1971, London University, King's College; M.A. (Bus. Law) CNAA 1971, City of London Polytechnic (now London Guildhall University), London; Grad.
    [Show full text]
  • Companies Act 2006 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 20 August 2021
    Changes to legislation: Companies Act 2006 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 20 August 2021. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) View outstanding changes Companies Act 2006 CHAPTER 46 COMPANIES ACT 2006 PART 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS Companies and Companies Acts 1 Companies 2 The Companies Acts Types of company 3 Limited and unlimited companies 4 Private and public companies 5 Companies limited by guarantee and having share capital 6 Community interest companies PART 2 COMPANY FORMATION General 7 Method of forming company 8 Memorandum of association Requirements for registration 9 Registration documents 10 Statement of capital and initial shareholdings 11 Statement of guarantee 12 Statement of proposed officers ii Companies Act 2006 (c. 46) Document Generated: 2021-08-20 Changes to legislation: Companies Act 2006 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 20 August 2021. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) View outstanding changes 12A Statement of initial significant control 13 Statement of compliance Registration and its effect 14 Registration 15 Issue of certificate of incorporation 16 Effect of registration PART 3 A COMPANY'S CONSTITUTION CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTORY 17 A company's
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal Ontology of the Corporation As a Description of Its Goal, and Its Role in Society
    Social Innovation Centre The Legal Ontology of the Corporation as a Description of its Goal, And its Role in Society _______________ David RONNEGARD 2009/09/ISIC The Legal Ontology of the Corporation as a Description of its Goal, and its Role in Society by David Ronnegard* * Post -Doctoral Fellow of Ethics and Social Responsibility at INSEAD, P.O.Box: 48049, Abu Dhabi, U.A.E; Ph:+971 2 446 08 08; Email:, [email protected] A working paper in the INSEAD Working Paper Series is intended as a means whereby a faculty researcher's thoughts and findings may be communicated to interested readers. The paper should be considered preliminary in nature and may require revision. This working paper was developed using funds made available through the Abu Dhabi Education Council, whose support is gratefully acknowledged. Printed at INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France. Kindly do not reproduce or circulate without permission. ABSTRACT The purpose of the corporation in society has been an issue of contention ever since the Berle-Dodd debate in the 1930’s and still resonates as part of the “basic-debate” in the field of business ethics today. Prescriptions on the purpose of the corporation should be argued in relation to a robust description of the purpose it actually has so that we know what change is being argued for. As the corporation is a manifestation of law it provides a privileged perspective for describing the purpose of the corporation. This paper provides a description of the purpose (the goal and role) of the corporation in society through an analysis of four primary attributes of the corporate legal form.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in the Prosecution of Directors
    1 Trends in the prosecution of directors 05/02/2016 Corporate Crime analysis: Jason Mansell and Polly Dyer, barristers at QEB Hollis Whiteman Chambers, say directors should ensure that they are aware of their personal responsibilities under the Companies Acts and Insolvency Act 1986, particularly given the range of civil and criminal tools available. What are the key areas in which prosecutions are currently taking place? What are the reasons behind this? The Companies Acts and Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) create what some may consider to be a surprisingly large number of criminal offences. However, a large proportion are rarely prosecuted, with authorities generally preferring to pursue civil remedies as opposed to launching criminal proceedings. When prosecuted, prosecutions generally take place for fraudulent trading contrary to section 993 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) and offences contrary to IA 1986, s 262A (fraud in obtaining a voluntary arrangement) and IA 1986, ss 353–62 (offences concerning bankrupts). Failure to deliver accounts and annual returns also attracts criminal prosecutions, although it is again clear that criminal sanctions are far from the preferred option (more than 150,000 private and public companies in England and Wales were made subject to a civil penalty in connection with the late filing of accounts in 2014/15). In December 2015, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) unsuccessfully prosecuted three former directors of parcel delivery company City Link for allegedly failing to give statutory notice to the Secretary of State of plans to make staff redundant contrary to section 194(1) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULR(C)A 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Fraud Act 2006 (C
    10/23/2014 Fraud Act 2006 (c. 35) xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" Fraud Act 2006 2006 CHAPTER 35 An Act to make provision for, and in connection with, criminal liability for fraud and obtaining services dishonestly. [8th November 2006] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:—​ Fraud 1 Fraud (1) A person is guilty of fraud if he is in breach of any of the sections listed in subsection (2) (which provide for different ways of committing the offence). (2) The sections are— (a) section 2 (fraud by false representation), (b) section 3 (fraud by failing to disclose information), and (c) section 4 (fraud by abuse of position). (3) A person who is guilty of fraud is liable— (a) on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum (or to both); (b) on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years or to a fine (or to both). (4) Subsection (3)(a) applies in relation to Northern Ireland as if the reference to 12 months were a reference to 6 months. 2 Fraud by false representation (1) A person is in breach of this section if he— (a) dishonestly makes a false representation, and (b) intends, by making the representation— (i) to make a gain for himself or another, or (ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.
    [Show full text]
  • THE COMPANIES ACTS 1985, 1989 and 2006
    THE COMPANIES ACTS 1985, 1989 and 2006 A PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED BY SHARES ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF BIOME TECHNOLOGIES PLC (Adopted pursuant to Special Resolution passed on 17th December 1990, amended by a Special Resolution passed on 29th July 1991, amended by a Special Resolution passed on 13th March 1997, amended by a Special Resolution passed on 19th June 1998 and amended by a Special Resolution passed on 2 May 2003 and amended by a Special Resolution passed on 3 June 2004 and amended by a Special Resolution passed on 30 August 2005 and amended by a Special Resolution passed on 27 April 2007 and amended by a Special Resolution passed on 24 April 2009 and further amended by a Special Resolution passed on 14 June 2010) PRELIMINARY 1. The regulations contained In Table A in the Schedule to the Companies (Tables A to F) Regulations 1985 (as amended by the Companies (Tables A to F) (Amendment) Regulations 1985) and in any Table A applicable to the Company under any former or subsequent enactment relating to companies shall not apply to the Company except insofar as they are repeated or contained in these Articles. 2. In these Articles, unless the context otherwise requires:- "the Statutes" means the Companies Acts as defined in section 2 of the Companies Act 2006 and every statutory modification or re-enactment thereof for the time being in force and every other Act for the time being in force concerning companies and affecting the Company; "these Articles" means these Articles of Association, as originally adopted, or as from time to time altered in accordance with the Statutes; "the Auditors" means the Auditors for the time being of the Company; "Board" means the board of Directors for the time being of the Company or the Directors present at a duly convened meeting of Directors at which a quorum is present.
    [Show full text]