Texas Electronics Industry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Texas Electronics Industry Texas electronics industry www.BusinessInTexas.com The Texas Electronics Industry 2013 Contents Electronics Industry Overview 2 Semiconductors 11 Computer Equipment 19 Communications Equipment 22 Electronic Instruments 26 Texas High Tech Headlines Apple breaks ground on $300 million expansion at Austin campus, plans to hire 3,600 See Page 9 Ericsson begins $54 million Samsung Semiconductor expansion of U.S headquarters continues construction on $4 in Plano billion expansion at Austin fab See Page 11 See Page 24 Texas ranks #2 in Austin-based Texas public electronics National universitiesaward employment Instruments to add more than 26,000 nationwide 1,000 jobs at HQ high tech- related degrees since 2009 See Page 27 See Page 5 See Page 7 Texas-based Dell Inc. to go Semiconductor firmsCirrus private in $24 billion buyout Logic and Maxim Integrated Products build new corporate Dell operations info: facilities in Texas See Page 19 See Page 12 The Electronics Industry in Texas Top Three Texas Electronics Giants Dell Texas Freescale Sem- Instruments iconductor HQ: Round HQ: Austin Rock HQ: Dallas Semiconductors Computers, Semiconductors he electronics industry is an important and IT Services $13.7 billion $3.2 billion annual sales annual sales growing part of the diverse Texas economy, $62.1 billion T directly employing over 196,000 across the annual sales state. Nationally, Texas ranks No. 2 in electronics employment and No. 3 in output. And, for the first time in 2012, Texas ranks No. 1 nationally in electron- ics exports. Texas Electronics Employment Texas has been an electronics leader ever since the Second Quarter 2012, by Sector industry took off globally in the 1950s and Texas Instruments (TI) and other high tech companies established the state as a key tech hub. In fact, a TI engineer invented the integrated circuit in Dallas in Semiconductors 43,886 1958. Since then, the high tech electronics industry Electronic has spread its roots across the state with advances in Instruments 23,531 Computer semiconductors, computers, telecommunications, and, Manufacturing more recently, computer services. 16,037 Texas is an ideal location for Communications 13,028 Texas Electronics electronics design and Computer manufacturing firms, with a Systems Design State Rankings: diverse and highly skilled 58,718 Computer No. 1 in Exports workforce, a low-tax, Wholesale 41,082 No. 2 in Workforce business friendly environ- ment, a large consumer No. 3 in Value Added market, access to leading research universities, and a rich history of technological innovation. Electronics Source: Texas Workforce Commission firms in Texas also benefit from proximity to custom- Data note: This report covers activities categorized in the North American Industry Classi- ers in related industries, including aerospace & fication System (NAICS): Computers & Peripheral Equipment Mfg. (3341); Communica- defense, oil & gas, and automotive manufacturing. tions Equipment Mfg. (3342); Semiconductor & Electronic Components Mfg. (3344); Semiconductor Machinery Mfg. (333242); Electronic Instrument Mfg. (3345); Computer Wholesalers (423430); and Computer Systems Design (541512). 2 OVERVIEW State of the Industry Electronics Exports from Texas Total value of shipments from Texas to international In 2010, Texas ranked No. 3 nationally for electronics markets (in billions of U.S. dollars) by Sector manufacturing output, accounting for nearly 10% of the Semiconductors and Electronic Components U.S. total electronics manufacturing value, as measured$15.0 $15.0 by gross domestic product (GDP). $10.0 $10.0 $12.6 B $13.2 B $14.0 B $5.0 $9.8 B $5.0 Output of the Texas Electronics Industry $0.0 $0.0 From 2000-2010, the (GDP) of the Texas electronics man- 2009 2010 2011 2012 ufacturing industry grew from $16.4 billion to $24.1 bil- lion, a 47% increase. $15.0 Computers and Related Equipment $15.0 $10.0 $10.0 $12.8 B $5.0 $10.0 B $10.5 B $5.0 $21.7 B $24.1 B $8.7 B $16.4 B $0.0 $0.0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2000 2005 2010 $15.0 $15.0 Telecom Equipment Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis$10.0 $10.0 $5.0 $9.5 B $5.0 $6.9 B $8.2 B $8.9 B $0.0 $0.0 Texas Claims Spot as 2009 2010 2011 2012 Nation’s No. 1 Electronics Source: U.S. Census Bureau Exporting State In 2012, Texas ranked No. 1 in the U.S. Top Five Texas Ports for Electronics Exports for electronics exports, with over $42.4 By total value of international shipments (in billions, 2012) billion in electronic products shipped internationally. Texas electronics exports rose 9% in 2012 to edge out California DFW INT’L AIRPORT for this top spot. Mexico is the top $11.4 B destination for these goods, with nearly half of all Texas electronics exports heading to its southern neighbor. HOUSTON BUSH Electronics was the third largest export INT’L AIRPORT sector for Texas, behind petroleum $3.7 B EL PASO products and chemicals. Overall, Texas $11.0 B has been the top exporting state for 11 straight years. LAREDO $9.9 B HIDALGO $2.9 B 3 OVERVIEW Major Electronics Companies in Texas Select firms with corporate, research, or manufacturing facilities in the state Representative sample only. Map does not include all company locations. 4 OVERVIEW Texas Electronics Workforce Texas Ranks No. 2 in the U.S. in Total Electronics Employment Texas’ electronics workforce is the second largest in California the nation, with more than 137,500 professionals California 373,438 employed directly in hardware manufacturing and sales, and an additional 58,700 employed in computerTexas Texas 196,282 systems design. The second largest electronics sector in the state is semiconductor and electronic compo-Virginia Virginia 115,808 nent manufacturing, which includes integrated circuits, microprocessors, memory chips, andNew printed York New York 110,970 circuit boards and assemblies. This sector accounts for nearly 22% of electronics employment Massachusettsin Texas (see Massachusetts 90,910 table below). Florida Florida 81,265 The Texas workforce is significantly more specialized in electronics manufacturing than other U.S. states,Illinois Illinois 68,557 measured by electronics workers per capita. The percentage of Texas workers employed in semicon- Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics ductor, computer, and telecom manufacturing is 30%- 40% greater than the national average. Electronics-Related Employment in Texas Second Quarter 2012 Average Sector (Industry Code) Employees Firms Annual Wage Computers and Peripheral Equipment Mfg. (3341) 16,037 95 $122,148 Communications Equipment Manufacturing (3342) 13,028 154 $109,252 Semiconductor and Electronic Components Mfg. (3344) 43,236 346 $95,212 Semiconductor Machinery Manufacturing (333242) 650 24 $82,316 Electronic Instrument Manufacturing (3345) 23,531 493 $84,604 Computers, Peripheral Equip. & Software Wholesale (423430) 41,082 765 $103,064 Computer Systems Design Services (541512) 58,718 6,800 $88,660 TOTAL 196,282 8,677 $96,714 Source: Texas Workforce Commission 5 OVERVIEW Texas 5-Year Employment Trends by Sector, 2007 to 2012 60,000 Semiconductors Computer Systems Design 45,000 Computer Wholesale 30,000 Electronic Instruments Computer Manufacturing 15,000 Communications Equipment 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Source: Texas Workforce Commission. Q1 2007 to Q2 2012 Mirroring national trends, electronics manufacturing employment in Texas decreased by roughly 15% from 2007- Patents and Venture Capital 2012. As shown in the above chart, jobs in the state’s semiconductor sector were most affected, declining by 24%, Texas’ continued strength in the electronics as the industry continued to undergo significant consolidation industry is due in large part to the growing pipeline of electronics-related patents and globally. Although electronics production employment venture capital in the state. contracted statewide, significant employment Texas’ annual high-tech patent output increased by 37% from 2001-2011, gains were seen in non- and Texas ranked No. 2 nationally in manufacturing sectors of 2011 for total high-tech patents, the industry during this according to the U.S. Patent and period. The computer Trademark Office (USPTO). systems design sector, In July 2012, Dallas was selected as a which includes hardware location for one of four new USPTO and software design, as satellite locations. Dallas was chosen in well as the computer part because of the state’s growing equipment wholesale output of high-tech innovations. The sector, which includes office is expected to open in 2013. post-assembly distribu- From 2002-2012, venture capital firms tion and services, both added significant numbers of Texas invested nearly $5 billion in Texas jobs, particularly starting in late 2009. Additionally, despite electronics companies, according to declining head counts at Texas electronics firms, the state’s PricewaterhouseCoopers. electronics industry output increased by 47% from 2000-2010, due to productivity gains (see output chart on page 3). 6 OVERVIEW Electronics Education in Texas Number of Electronics-Related Degrees Awarded, 2009-2012 All Texas Public Universities, All Degree Levels Electrical, Electronics and Telecom Engineering 7,639 Computer and Software Engineering 1,951 Computer Science 8,048 Information Science & Technology 2,064 Mathematics and Physics 6,470 TOTAL 26,172 Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Top Ten Texas Universities for Electronics-Related R&D by FY 2011 Expenditures Total R&D Institution (Millions) Texas in Top Tier for Tech-Related Doctorates University of Texas (UT) at Austin $63.2 Texas A&M University $49.1 In 2011, the National Science Foundation Rice University (Houston) $41.9 ranked Texas among the top tier of U.S. states for number of doctorates awarded in UT at Arlington $12.4 tech-related fields: Texas Tech University (Lubbock) $12.0 No. 3 for All Doctorates Awarded UT at El Paso $9.7 No. 2 for All Engineering University of Houston $9.0 No. 2 for Electrical Engineering UT at Dallas $5.3 No.
Recommended publications
  • OMAP2430 Applications Processor
    TM Technology for Innovators OMAP2430 applications processor All-in-One Key features entertainment • Advanced Imaging, Video and Audio Accelerator (IVA™ 2) boosts video for 3G mobile performance in mobile phones by up to 4X and imaging performance by up to 1.5X phones • Delivering a multimedia experience with consumer electronics quality to the handset • Multi-engine parallel processing architecture for supporting complex usage scenarios • Built-in M-Shield™ mobile security technology enables value-added services and terminal security • Support for all major High Level Operating Systems (HLOS) aids applications development PRODUCT BULLETIN Leading imaging The new OMAP2430 processor from Texas Instruments (TI) delivers a new and video level of multimedia performance to third-generation (3G) mobile phones and performance other handheld systems. Leveraging TI’s proven OMAP™ 2 architecture, the OMAP2430 features an advanced imaging, video and audio accelerator (IVA™ 2) that provides a 4X improvement in video processing and 1.5X improvement in image processing over previously available solutions for mobile phones. The processor’s high video performance enables advanced codec algorithms that promote higher compression ratios allowing networks to support more data, bringing down costs for service providers and allowing them to deploy revenue- generating services such as mobile digital TV and mobile-to-mobile gaming. Support for these services, plus high-resolution, high-speed decode of standard video compression algorithms, brings a TV-like viewing quality and the familiar features of consumer electronics to mobile communications. The OMAP2430 is optimized for the complex applications characteristic of 3G wireless communications. Offering even higher performance than first-generation OMAP 2 processors while at a lower cost, the OMAP2430 processor provides the ultimate balance between multimedia performance, flexibility, power and cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Imaging for Semiconductor Industry
    Quantum Imaging for Semiconductor Industry Anna V. Paterova1,*, Hongzhi Yang1, Zi S. D. Toa1, Leonid A. Krivitsky1, ** 1Institute of Materials Research and Engineering, Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*STAR), 138634 Singapore *[email protected] **[email protected] Abstract Infrared (IR) imaging is one of the significant tools for the quality control measurements of fabricated samples. Standard IR imaging techniques use direct measurements, where light sources and detectors operate at IR range. Due to the limited choices of IR light sources or detectors, challenges in reaching specific IR wavelengths may arise. In our work, we perform indirect IR microscopy based on the quantum imaging technique. This method allows us to probe the sample with IR light, while the detection is shifted into the visible or near-IR range. Thus, we demonstrate IR quantum imaging of the silicon chips at different magnifications, wherein a sample is probed at 1550 nm wavelength, but the detection is performed at 810 nm. We also analyze the possible measurement conditions of the technique and estimate the time needed to perform quality control checks of samples. Infrared (IR) metrology plays a significant role in areas ranging from biological imaging1-5 to materials characterisation6 and microelectronics7. For example, the semiconductor industry utilizes IR radiation for non-destructive microscopy of silicon-based devices. However, IR optical components, such as synchrotrons8, quantum cascade lasers, and HgCdTe (also known as MCT) photodetectors, are expensive. Some of these components, in order to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio, may require cryogenic cooling, which further increases costs over the operational lifetime.
    [Show full text]
  • OBS Transforming CX
    Winning the Global Consumer Electronics Industry A checklist for global, consistent and secure CX "The Age of Experience will be defined by personalized technology that meets your needs… the devices you use will understand you as an individual, blurring the boundaries between the digital and physical worlds." HS KIM President and CEO of Consumer Electronics Division Samsung Electronics Smartphones, smart TVs, laptops and tablets, The global electrical appliances, wearable devices – the US$1 trillion consumer electronics industry permeates every aspect consumer of our lives. It is a proof of the incredible pace of Global consumer electronics innovation around us. electronics market The intense competition especially from many of the size in 2019 industry industry’s Asian leaders such as Samsung, Huawei, Sony, Xiaomi and LG, renders differentiation around product and pricing difficult. COVID-19 has accelerated competition as consumer behaviours shift from purchasing and in-person browsing to their digital equivalents. Companies are looking to create unique personalized Key trends: experiences that optimize every stage of the customer journey across each interaction, be it in-store, or via a Increased demand in website, a mobile app, social media, smartphones, or the emerging markets e-mail, to deliver the right experiences at the right Growing dominance time. Done well, enriched customer experiences will enable businesses in the consumer electronics of Asian companies industry to build customer loyalty in driving Convergence of sustainable competitive advantage in the long-term. technologies, devices and industries ¹ Consumer Electronics Market Size, Global Market Insights Key trends shaping the future Localization drives conversions As consumer electronics giants such as Xiaomi, Huawei, and Samsung compete for market shares in new geographies, a nuanced approach is crucial for building a strong brand presence across diverse markets.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolving Electronics Industry Courting the Customer Through Insight and Innovation
    Smarter electronics Point of view The evolving electronics industry Courting the customer through insight and innovation Transistor by transistor, the electronics industry is literally changing the world. Consider this: today’s fastest computer can now achieve 17 quadril- lion calculations per second1, and by 2015 there will be more than seven billion mobile devices in the world consuming and generating massive amounts of data.2 Right now there are more than one billion transistors for each person on the planet.3 With innovations like these, it is no surprise that the electronics industry continues to be a leader in research and development investment across the world.4 However, despite an impressive track record of pioneering technology, today’s electronics industry is in a state of disruption. Product life-cycles are compressing, emphasizing the need to create innovative products and services faster and more cheaply than ever before. Competitive pressures are at an all-time high, with aggressive new entrants vying with a continuing need to contain operational costs. And though profit margins for some electronics segments remain relatively high, most are under heavy margin pressure. Together, these trends are driving electronics companies to find new growth opportunities. Many believe that the best way to do this—perhaps the only way to do it—is to transform their business models by getting closer to their customers. In fact, the 2012 IBM CEO study revealed that 86 percent of global electronics CEOs are implementing extensive changes in their organizations to deepen their understanding of individual customer needs, while enabling faster, more relevant responses to markets and individuals.5 CEOs realize that innovative products and services are only successful when they deliver on customer needs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REPORT | 3 About This Report
    2014 Corporate Social Responsibility freescale.com Table of Contents Introduction 3 Community Engagement 31 Message from President and CEO, Gregg Lowe 4 Employees in Action 32 Sustainability at a Glance 5 Focus on Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) 34 Corporate Governance 6 Freescale Foundation 35 Company Overview 8 Environment, Health and Safety Policy 36 Research and Development 9 Manufacturing Responsibility 37 Quality 10 E-Scrap Reclamation 41 Manufacturing 11 Environment Matters—Remediation Activities 42 Electronics Industry Citizenship Coalition (EICC) 14 Beyond EHS Compliance 43 Customers, Sales and Products 15 Recognized for Our EHS Excellence 44 Product Responsibility 22 How to Reach Us 45 Our Team 25 Inclusion: Leveraging the Power of One 26 Our Anti-Discrimination Policy 27 Our Commitment to Being a Great Place to Work 28 Our Commitment to University Recruiting 29 Employee Leadership and Development 30 INTRODUCTION 2014 CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REPORT | 3 About This Report This corporate social responsibility report provides an integrated overview of the economic, environmental and social aspects of Freescale Semiconductor’s (Freescale) business activities and products. Our corporate social responsibility report describes Freescale’s commitment to the communities in which we live and work, our employees and the environment and reflects the standards of the Freescale Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Our commitment is to act with integrity, communicate openly and honestly and treat everyone with respect and fairness, including: • In the workplace, by placing a high value on diversity and inclusion, taking action against all forms of harassment or entities, customers, suppliers, employees and other business improper labor practices and promoting the health and partners) about our corporate social responsibility progress and well-being of our employees; initiatives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolving Role of Semiconductor Consortia in the United States and Japan
    Portland State University PDXScholar Business Faculty Publications and Presentations The School of Business Fall 1998 The Evolving Role of Semiconductor Consortia in the United States and Japan Rose Marie Ham University of California - Berkeley Greg Linden University of California - Berkeley Melissa M. Appleyard Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/busadmin_fac Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Ham, R., Linden, G., & Appleyard, M. M. (1998). The Evolving Role of Semiconductor Consortia in the United States and Japan. California Management Review, 41(1), 137-163. This Article is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Business Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. The Evolving Role of Semiconductor Consortia in the United States and Japan Rose Marie Ham Greg Linden Melissa M. Appleyard ince the late 1970s, governments throughout the industrialized economics have proclaimed the benefits of research consortia. In the United States, tor example, ihe 1984 National Cooperative Research SAct (NCRA) relaxed U.S. antitrust laws to encourage the formation of research consortia hy firms in the same industry; by the end of 1995, over 575 consortia had heen registered under the NCRA in a variety of
    [Show full text]
  • Global Semiconductor Industry | Accenture
    GLOBALITY AND COMPLEXITY of the Semiconductor Ecosystem The semiconductor industry is a truly global affair. Around the world, semiconductor chip designers use intellectual property (IP) licenses and design verification to provide designs to wafer fabricators, which use raw silicon, photomasks, and equipment to create chips for package manufacturing to assemble with printed circuit board (PCB) substrates for delivery to end customers. In fact, components for a chip could travel more than 25,000 miles by the time it finds its way into a television set, mobile phone, automobile, computer, or any of the millions of products that now rely on chips to operate (Figure 1). 2 | Globality and Complexity of the Semiconductor Ecosystem Figure 1: Components for a chip could travel more than 25,000 miles before completion IP Licenses Euipment Modules Package Raw Silicon Manufacturing PC Substrates Asembly Standard Products and Test components Wafer Fabrication Equipment Chip Design Design Verification Photomask Wafer Manufacturing Fabrication The Global Semiconductor Alliance (GSA) and Accenture have teamed up to conduct a joint study on the globality and complexity of the semiconductor ecosystem to explore the interdependencies and benefits of the cross-border partnerships required to produce semiconductors, as well as to illustrate what’s needed to keep this global ecosystem operating efficiently and profitably. Industry executives can use this study to inform their company strategies, as well as to educate non-semiconductor partners, including policy makers, on the nature of their business to promote a better understanding of the important role semiconductors play in everyday life and on the globe-spanning ecosystem that’s needed to produce them.
    [Show full text]
  • Portfolio Holdings Listing Select Semiconductors Portfolio As of June
    Portfolio Holdings Listing Select Semiconductors Portfolio DUMMY as of August 31, 2021 The portfolio holdings listing (listing) provides information on a fund’s investments as of the date indicated. Top 10 holdings information (top 10 holdings) is also provided for certain equity and high income funds. The listing and top 10 holdings are not part of a fund’s annual/semiannual report or Form N-Q and have not been audited. The information provided in this listing and top 10 holdings may differ from a fund’s holdings disclosed in its annual/semiannual report and Form N-Q as follows, where applicable: With certain exceptions, the listing and top 10 holdings provide information on the direct holdings of a fund as well as a fund’s pro rata share of any securities and other investments held indirectly through investment in underlying non- money market Fidelity Central Funds. A fund’s pro rata share of the underlying holdings of any investment in high income and floating rate central funds is provided at a fund’s fiscal quarter end. For certain funds, direct holdings in high income or convertible securities are presented at a fund’s fiscal quarter end and are presented collectively for other periods. For the annual/semiannual report, a fund’s investments include trades executed through the end of the last business day of the period. This listing and the top 10 holdings include trades executed through the end of the prior business day. The listing includes any investment in derivative instruments, and excludes the value of any cash collateral held for securities on loan and a fund’s net other assets.
    [Show full text]
  • GS40 0.11-Μm CMOS Standard Cell/Gate Array
    GS40 0.11-µm CMOS Standard Cell/Gate Array Version 1.0 January 29, 2001 Copyright Texas Instruments Incorporated, 2001 The information and/or drawings set forth in this document and all rights in and to inventions disclosed herein and patents which might be granted thereon disclosing or employing the materials, methods, techniques, or apparatus described herein are the exclusive property of Texas Instruments. No disclosure of information or drawings shall be made to any other person or organization without the prior consent of Texas Instruments. IMPORTANT NOTICE Texas Instruments and its subsidiaries (TI) reserve the right to make changes to their products or to discontinue any product or service without notice, and advise customers to obtain the latest version of relevant information to verify, before placing orders, that information being relied on is current and complete. All products are sold subject to the terms and conditions of sale supplied at the time of order acknowledgement, including those pertaining to warranty, patent infringement, and limitation of liability. TI warrants performance of its semiconductor products to the specifications applicable at the time of sale in accordance with TI’s standard warranty. Testing and other quality control techniques are utilized to the extent TI deems necessary to support this war- ranty. Specific testing of all parameters of each device is not necessarily performed, except those mandated by government requirements. Certain applications using semiconductor products may involve potential risks of death, personal injury, or severe property or environmental damage (“Critical Applications”). TI SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS ARE NOT DESIGNED, AUTHORIZED, OR WAR- RANTED TO BE SUITABLE FOR USE IN LIFE-SUPPORT DEVICES OR SYSTEMS OR OTHER CRITICAL APPLICATIONS.
    [Show full text]
  • LPC47N267 Product Brief
    LPC47N267 100-Pin LPC Super I/O with X-Bus Interface Product Features • Enhanced Digital Data Separator - 2 Mbps, 1 Mbps, 500 Kbps, 300 Kbps, 250 • 3.3 Volt Operation (5V tolerant) Kbps Data Rates • Programmable Wakeup Event Interface - Programmable Precompensation Modes (IO_PME# Pin) • Serial Ports • SMI Support (IO_SMI# Pin) - Two Full Function Serial Ports • GPIOs (29) - High Speed NS16C550 Compatible UARTs • Four IRQ Input Pins with Send/Receive 16-Byte FIFOs • X-Bus Interface - Supports 230k and 460k Baud - Supports up to 4 external components - Programmable Baud Rate Generator - Supports I/O cycles (No Memory Support) - Modem Control Circuitry - 8-Bit Data Transfer • Infrared Communications Controller - 16-Bit Address Qualification - IrDA v1.2 (4Mbps), HPSIR, ASKIR, Con- - Write Protection for each component sumer IR Support • XNOR Chain -2 IR Ports • PC99 and ACPI 1.0b Compliant - 96 Base I/O Address, 15 IRQ Options and 3 • 100-pin STQFP Package DMA Options • Intelligent Auto Power Management • Multi-Mode Parallel Port with ChiProtect • 2.88MB Super I/O Floppy Disk Controller - Standard Mode IBM PC/XT, PC/AT, and PS/2 - Licensed CMOS 765B Floppy Disk Controller Compatible Bidirectional Parallel Port - Software and Register Compatible with - Enhanced Parallel Port (EPP) Compatible - Microchip's Proprietary 82077AA Compatible EPP 1.7 and EPP 1.9 (IEEE 1284 Compliant) Core - IEEE 1284 Compliant Enhanced Capabilities - Supports One Floppy Drive Directly Port (ECP) - Configurable Open Drain/Push-Pull Output - ChiProtect Circuitry for
    [Show full text]
  • Warburton, John Henry. (2010). Picture Radio
    ! ∀# ∃ !∃%& ∋ ! (()(∗( Picture Radio: Will pictures, with the change to digital, transform radio? John Henry Warburton Master of Philosophy Southampton Solent University Faculty of Media, Arts and Society July 2010 Tutor Mike Richards 3 of 3 Picture Radio: Will pictures, with the change to digital, transform radio? By John Henry Warburton Abstract This work looking at radio over the last 80 years and digital radio today will consider picture radio, one way that the recently introduced DAB1 terrestrial digital radio could be used. Chapter one considers the radio history including early picture radio and television, plus shows how radio has come from the crystal set, with one pair of headphones, to the mains powered wireless with built in speakers. These radios became the main family entertainment in the home until television takes over that role in the mid 1950s. Then radio changed to a portable medium with the coming of transistor radios, to become the personal entertainment medium it is today. Chapter two and three considers the new terrestrial digital mediums of DAB and DRM2 plus how it works, what it is capable of plus a look at some of the other digital radio platforms. Chapter four examines how sound is perceived by the listener and that radio broadcasters will need to understand the relationship between sound and vision. We receive sound and then make pictures in the mind but to make sense of sound we need codes to know what it is and make sense of it. Chapter five will critically examine the issues of commercial success in radio and where pictures could help improve the radio experience as there are some things that radio is restricted to as a sound only medium.
    [Show full text]
  • Released in December 1957, the TR-63 Was Sony's First Pocket-Size Transistor Radio
    Released in December 1957, the TR-63 was Sony's first pocket-size transistor radio. It's a 6-transistor superhet design with some interesting design features, including the use of Sony-manufactured NPN transistors in the circuit. Masaru Ibuka served with the Impe- used in schools and courts. much discussion, Sony's research labo- rial Navy Wartime Research Committee Following Ibuka's visionary 1952 ratory head, Mikato Kikuchi, suggested during World War 2, leaving in 1946 to trip to the USA to sign a licence with dropping Bells' preferred doping agent, join Akio Morita to form Tokyo Tsushin Western Electric, Sony acquired pat- indium, and substituting phosphorus Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha, "Totsuko". ent rights for the transistor and subse- instead. When that didn't work, Morita Morita, a physics graduate, had served quently began manufacturing portable called for "more doping"! alongside Ibuka in the Research Com- radios in 1955. It soon paid off and Sony were able mittee, and their friendship laid the to produce the transistors used in their foundations for the international pow- Early difficulties first solid-state radios. Their TR-55 erhouse we now know simply as Sony. Sony preferred NPN transistors be- model, released in 1955, is now a rarity Tokyo Tsushin Kogyo's first prod- cause of their better high-frequency and the last one to be listed online some uct, a rice cooker, says a lot about the response but were initially unable to years ago had a price tag of $US1500. company. Japan had suffered massive produce working examples. One can only imagine the energy destruction during World War 2 due to NPN devices exploit the fact that invested by Sony to leap from Ibuka's bombing and people needed utensils to electrons move more quickly than licensing agreement to a marketable cook their staple food, which was rice.
    [Show full text]