sign in sign up
<<
Home , Accommodation (religion), Mariology, Mysterium Paschale, Patriarch, Theopaschism

NOTRE DAME ! SCHOOL OF Professor: Dr. Liberto Class: and e-mail: [email protected] Time: Saturday (7:30am-4:30pm) !Office hours: Saturday, 12-1pm Classroom: Room 3 DT 506 - Christology and Mariology Syllabus ! ! !I. Course Description This course treats the theology of the person and mission of . While providing the biblical foundation for an understanding of Christ, the course is primarily directed to studying Christology from a historico-dogmatic perspective. The course will examine important texts such as the De Incarnatione of St. Athanasius, the De Fide of St. John Damscene, and selections from the Summa theologiae of St. . An essential Mariology will also be covered. The course examines the various Marian dogmas and the relation of Mariology to other !dogmatic areas such as , Soteriology, and Spiritual Theology. !II. Rationale The person and work of Christ is the foundation of the Christian . This central mystery is important for understanding other theological loci such as the , grace, and the . For seminarians studying for the priesthood, knowledge of the person and work of Christ is indispensable for understanding the vocation of the priest who is called to minister in persona !Christi. !III. Envisioned Outcomes • Students will understand the problems and solutions in the Patristic development of Christology ! up to the .

1 • Students will be able to identify the subsequent Christological problems after Chalcedon and the ’s theological response. • Students will understand the various contributions to Christology in the Scholastic period. • Students will be able to evaluate modern in light of the tradition. • Students will be able to articulate an essential Mariology based on the dogmatic teaching of the ! Church. !IV. Instructional Methods • Lecture • Presentations • Discussion

!V. Requirements A. Read all assignments and be prepared to discuss them in class. B. Class presentation (11/22)– Students present a critical summary of an assigned article or a synopsis of their research from doing the Research Paper C. Exam (11/1) – Students will be asked to write in-class essays on various questions. D. Research Paper (due the last day of class (e-format preferred) – See the Research Paper Guideline Sheet for more information on what is required for the assignment. One should also consult the Research Paper Grading Rubric for grading criteria.

!VI. Texts A. Christology B. Other primary and secondary texts as assigned. These will be sent to the students as PDF files via email. Students should always have needed texts available for class (e-version or ! hard copy). !VII. Bibliography Anatolios, Khaled. “Yes and No: Reflections on Lewis Ayres, Nicaea and Its Legacy.” Harvard Theological Review 100/2 (2007): 153-58. Armstrong, A. H. “The Plotinian of ΝΟΥΣ in Patristic Theology.” Vigiliae Christianae 8/4 (1954): 134-38. Ayres, Lewis. “Athanasius' Initial Defense of the Term Ὁµοούσιος: Rereading the De Decretis.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 12/ 3 (2004): 337-59. ______. “The Christological Context of Augustineʹs De Trinitate XIII: Toward Relocating Books VIII-XV.” Augustinian Studies 29/1 (1998): 111-39. Bathrellos, David. The Byzantine Christ: Person, Nature, and Will in the Christology of St. Maximus the . Oxford Early Christian Studies Series. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004. Bauckham, R. Crucified: Monotheism and Christology in the . Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1999.

2 Brown, H. O. J. Heresies: The Image of Christ in the Mirror of Heresy and from the to the Present. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1984. Brown, R. E. The Birth of the Messiah. London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1977. ______. Jesus, God and Man. New York: Macmillan, 1967. ______. The Virginal Conception and Bodily . New York: Paulist, 1973. Cross, Richard. The Metaphysics of the Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. Cullmann, O. The Christology of the New Testament. Translated by Shirley Guthrie and Hans Hall. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1963. Dunn, J. D. G. Christology in the Making: An Inquiry into the Origins of the Doctrine of the Incarnation. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1996. Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P., Reginald. The Mother of the Saviour and Our Interior Life. Translated by Bernard Kelly. St. Louis: Herder, 1949. Gockel, Matthias. “A Dubious Christological Formula?: Leontius of Byzantium and the Anhypostasis—Enhypostasis Theory.” Journal of Theological Studies 51/2 (2000): 515-32. Kasper, Walter. Jesus the Christ. London and New York: T&T Clark International, 2011. Kelly, J.N.D. Early Christian . 5th edition. New York: Continuum, 2000. Kereszty, Roch. Jesus Christ: Fundamentals of Christology. Alba House, 2002. McGrath. A. The Making of Modern German Christology. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, 1986. McGuckin, John A. St. : the Christological Controversy: Its History, Theology and Texts. NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2004. Ocariz, F., et al. The Mystery of Jesus Christ. Dublin, Ireland: Four Courts Press, 1991. O’Collins, G. Christology: A Biblical, Historical, and Systematic Study of Jesus Christ. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995. Rahner, Karl. “Chalkedon: Ende oder Anfang?” In Das Konzil von Chalkedon, Vol. III. Edited by Alois Grillmeier. Echter-Verlag, 1954. Ratzinger, J. Daughter Zion: Meditations on the Church’s Marian Belief. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1983. ______. Jesus of Nazareth. New York: Doubleday, 2007. Semmelroth, S.J., Otto. Mary: Archetype of the Church. New York: Sheed and Ward, 1963. Studer, Basil. Trinity and Incarnation: The Faith of the Early Church. Edited by Andrew Louth. Collegeville: Liturgical Press, 1994. van Beeck, Franz Josef. Christ Proclaimed: Christology as Rhetoric. In Theological Inquiries Series. New York: Paulist Press, 1979. van Loon. Hans. The Diophysite Christology of Cyril of Alexandria. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2009. von Balthasar, Hans Urs. : The Mystery of . Translated by Aidan Nichols. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmanns, 1993. Witherington, Ben. The Christology of Jesus. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Fortress Publishers !1990. !VIII. Glossary of Philosophical and Theological Terms – the general name applied to any Christological heresy which denies the natural and eternal sonship of Christ, but forwards a view of Christ as an adopted son.

3 anhypostatic – a term applied to the humanity of Christ, which although an integral human nature, does not terminate in a human hypostasis or person. Apollinarianism – a Christological heresy named for Apollinaris of Laodiciea which understood that the assumed an incomplete human nature, the Logos taking the place of the intellective soul. – a Christological/Trinitarian heresy named for the , Arius of Alexandria, which denied the deity of Christ. Arius’s phrase, “There was a time when he (the Logos) was not,” was condemned at the Council of Nicaea in 325. communicatio idiomata (communication of idioms or ) – based on the , this refers to the ability to predicate of Christ (the person) properties of both the human and divine natures. The expression, “God died on the cross,” is true based on the communication of idioms. Co-Redemptrix – a applied to Our Lady based on the role she plays in the of mankind. This role, however, is qualitatively different from, and dependent upon, the role played by Christ as the Redeemer of the world. (Gr. δοkεῖν- to seem or appear) – Christological heresy of the first centuries of the Church which understood the Incarnation (and therefore the Passion and Resurrection) as mere appearances by the Son of God in the economy. Ebionites – a Jewish-Christian sect of the Apostolic Period that denied the natural generation of Christ, thereby denying the full divinity of the Second Person of the Trinity. Eutychianism – Christological heresy named after the Eutyches which posited that over- emphasized the unity of the two natures in Christ so as to fuse the two into one theandric nature. fomes peccati – a term used to describe the disordered inclination to as a result of . hypostasis (Gr. ὑπόστασις) – a philosophical term that developed within the Trinitarian controversies of the 4th century and again in the Christological controversies of the 5th century. Originally having the same or similar sense as ousia (Gr. ὀυσία), the term came to be distinguished from ousia by the Cappadocians. At Chalcedon (451), Christ is described as one hypostasis in two natures. hypostatic union – a term referring to the union of the two natures of Christ in the person (hypostasis) of the Word. – a title and teaching applied to Mary based on the fact that she was conceived without the stain of original sin in view of the future merits of Christ. Kenotic Christology – descriptive of various christologies of the 19th century that applied the emptying (Gr. κένωσις) of Christ, as described in Phil 2:6-11, to the divinity of Christ. logos anthropos Christology – a type of Christology, usually identified with Antioch, that stressed the full and integral human nature. logos sarx Christology – a type of Christology, usually identified with Alexandria, that stressed the union of the Logos with the humanity of Christ. – a title used by various (Pius X, Benedict XV, Pius XI) to describe the real but derivative role of Mary in the mediation of graces. χριστός Gk. ) – a Hebrew word meaning anointed. A term/title used of ; משיח .Messiah (Hb kings and priests in the OT.

4 Mixed Relation – a philosophical concept developed in the Scholastic Period to describe the unequal relations between two things, whereby the relation from one thing to the other is real, but the relation of the second thing to the first is merely logical. A prime example is mixed relation between the knower and the thing known. Monoergism (Gr. µόνος- one, alone and ἐνέργεια- activity) – a Christological error that asserted only one theandric activity of the Word Incarnate. Monophysitism (Gr. µόνος- one, alone and φύσις- nature) – a Christological heresy that would reduce the natures of Christ into one nature. Monotheletism – (Gr. µονο- one, alone and θέλω - I want, will) – a Christological heresy that taught that Christ had only one will based on the one hypostasis, instead of two wills based on the integrity of each nature. Mother of God (Gr. θεοτόκος and Lt. genetrix) – title given to Mary, of more Christological import than Mariological, especially in the Patristic Period. Mary is truly Mother of God based on the correct understanding of the Hypostatic Union and the resultant communicatio idiomata. Her son is truly the Son of God (even if Mary is not merely the material source of the humanity of Christ), so she is truly the Mother of God. – a Christological heresy, bearing the name of its proponent, of . Nestorius’s position was tantamount to denying that Christ is only one subject or person. Nestorius held this based on his adequation of nature and subject. Ousia (Gr. οὐσία) – Greek philosophical term that is, by the Council of Chalcedon, similar to the meaning of the substantia. theandric (Gr. θεός- God and ἀνήρ - man) – a term applied to the activity of Christ which are, due to the Hypostatic Union, the work of the God-Man. The term can also be used incorrectly based on or tending to a Monophysite position. (Gr. θεός - God, and πάσχω- I suffer) – a term applicable to any of several heretical Christologies that attribute suffering to the Divine Nature in and through the ! passion of Christ. IX. Lecture and Reading Schedule ! ! Date Lecture Topic Reading Introduction and Syllabus ---

Biblical Christology Lecture

Patristic Christology (Introduction) Lecture Christology Reader ’s Peri archon 8/16 (CR) Athanasius’ De Incarnatione CR ’ Theological CR Orations St. Augustine’s De Trinitate CR

5 8/16 (cont.) Secondary Source Materials TBA

St. Cyril of Alexandria CR

Chalcedonian Christology ---

John Damascene’s De Fide CR

Anselm’s On the Incarnation CR 9/06 The Fitness of the Incarnation – St. Thomas’s Summa theologiae CR (STh 3.1) The Mode of Union – STh 3.2 CR

The Grace of Christ – STh 3.7 CR The STh 3.9 CR

On Christ’s Unity of Being CR STh 3.17 10/11 On Christ’s Unity of Will CR Classroom 7 STh 3.18 On Christ’s Unity of Operation CR STh 3.19 Of Christ’s Prayer CR STh 3.21

Mid-term exam ---

Theotokos Lecture

Mary’s Perpetual Virginity Power Point 11/01 Mary’s Immaculate Conception CR

The CR

6 Fifth Marian Dogma TBA

Student Presentations ---

Q and A — 11/22

Course Evaluation — ! ! !IX. Evaluation The student’s average will be based upon the following: 1) Final Exam (40%) 2) Mid-term Exam (35%) 3) class presentation (15%) 4) class participation and contributions (10%) ! !X. Attendance Policies Students are expected to be present for every class in the Saturday format. As one day is approximately eight hours of class, students cannot miss more than one day unless some arrangement has been agreed upon between the professor and the student before the third class of !the semester. A full policy of attendance follows: ! MISSING A SATURDAY SESSION In the M.A. Program in Theology, courses meet in an intensive Saturday format. Because of this, missing a Saturday session is never allowable if a student has not sought and received permission from the instructor. If a student is allowed to miss a Saturday session, the following conditions apply: A) The student must seek and receive permission to miss the session TO the session; B) The student must hand in all class requirements that are due on the date of the session missed no later than the date of that session; C) The student must arrange in advance to have a fellow student tape the entire Saturday session, and notify the instructor of the name of the student who will be taping the session; D) The student must take notes on all lectures and class activities from the taped session, and submit a typed copy of these notes to the instructor PRIOR TO the next class meeting (this can be done through email); E) The student cannot achieve a grade higher than a “B” in the course;

7 F) If the student fails to meet the above requirements (A-D), then the student will receive an “F” for the course. G) NO STUDENT IS ALLOWED TO MISS ANY ADDITIONAL SESSIONS. If a student misses an additional session they must withdraw from the course (with a grade of “W”, ! “WP” or “WF”) or receive an “F” for the course. !XI. Academic Integrity Students are expected to take full responsibility for their academic formation. They are expected to “respect academic scholarship by giving proper credit to other people’s work, while at the same time preparing well for assigned materials and examinations in such a way that their ! academic integrity will never be questioned.” !XII. Grading Scale ! Letter Grade Number Quality Points Grade! Scale A 4.00 100 – 94 A- 3.70 93 – 90 B+ 3.30 89 – 88 B 3.00 87 – 84 B- 2.70 83 – 80 C+ 2.30 79 – 78 C 2.00 77 – 74 C- 1.70 73 – 70 D+ 1.30 69 – 68 D 1.00 67 – 64 D- .70 63 – 60 !F 0.00 59 – 0 !XIII. Disability Accommodation Policy In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, Notre Dame Seminary provides disability accommodations for students with identified and/or diagnosed disabilities. Students with disabilities need not inform their instructors about the nature of their disabilities, but they are responsible for contacting and providing appropriate documentation to the Academic Resources Center. Requests for accommodations must be made each semester for which the student wishes to receive service; the Academic Resources Center will then distribute a letter of accommodation to the faculty. It is the student’s responsibility to meet with each faculty member to discuss how his/her accommodation(s) may be met within each course. Notre Dame Seminary will attempt to meet reasonable accommodations requested. A reasonable accommodation is a modification to a non-essential aspect of a course, program, or facility which does not pose an undue burden and which enables a qualified student with a disability to have adequate opportunity to participate and to demonstrate his or her ability. Such accommodations are

8 determined on an individual basis depending upon the nature and extent of the disability. For more information, contact the Academic ’s Office. ! XIV. Syllabus Contract ! This syllabus obliges the student to adhere to all policy requirements and to fulfill all academic expectations herein stated; it also entitles the student to a reasonable opportunity to learn the material specified in the course description in order to accomplish for himself the educational goals of the course. In order to optimize the learning process the course instructor reserves the right to make reasonable adjustments to the syllabus requirements during the semester in response to unforeseen developments or circumstances. All adjustments made must be ! communicated clearly to students. ! !

9