<<

--

26 Syeda Rizvi

liveness of capitalism, and the potential for revolution" (449). Unlike Meridel Le Sueur$, Salute to Spring, that is a c.all for revolution. in Yonnondio the ,vorking class does not stand together as a n1assive force to overthro,\t the sys· tern. Following the tradition of the proletariat literature, Le Sueur describes the hardships of the proletarians and finishes the book with the proletarians 1narching to protest against the capitalist systen1. In Younondio. the Holbrook Alice Shie l d s fam ily is surrounded by poverty, and the text does not signal that they will have a bright and prosper future. A Brief Int roduction into Her Life and Work WORKS C11'1lO Agee, James, and Walker Evans. Let Us Now Praise Famous Men. Boston,: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1941. Print. KATIE LEE Coiner) Constance. "'Tillie Olsen~ Life." A1odertJ An1ericat1 Poetry. 1995. Web. 28 Feb. 2018. Dawahare, Anthony. '"·niat Joyous Certainty': History and Utopia in Tillie Olsen's Depression f ra.Jjterature." Twe-ntietf, Century Literature 44.3 (1998): 261. Academic Search Premier. Web. 6 Apr. 20 15. I discuss the career of n1usic composer and interviC\,,.ed her for l lughcs, Langston. Let America Be America Again; Antl,ology of Morkm the purpose of this paper. Shields began her compositional career at dawning American Poetry. 515-517. Oncourse.iu.ed u. Web. 2 Feb. 20 IS. ofel ectronic n-1usic in the . Pior1eering sound collages using an- Lee, Corinna K. "Docu1nents of Proletarian Fiction: Ti lJ ie Olsen's «Yonnon• alog machines fi rst designed by RCA at the legendary Columbia - Princeton dio: From the Tl,irties;' Journal of Modern Literature 36.4 (2013): 113-132. Center, Shields has created nlusic spanning fi ve decades. Academic Search Premier. Web. 6 Apr. 2015. Already leading an impressive path as an electronic music composer and pro- Le Sueur, Meridel. Salute to Spring. : International Publishers, fessor. Shields performed major opera roles as a soprano across the \\'Orld. 1977. Print. l·laving made the transition as an electronic co1nposer from knobs machines Le Sueur, Meridel. Tlie Fetish ofBeing Outside; I larvest Songs Collected to software tools, Shields discusses the effects o f analog verses digital elec- Essays and Stories by Meridel l.e Sueur. West End Press, t 990. Oncourse. tronic n1usic processes. Pointing out hov~r the lack of body n1ovenlen1 in dig- iu.edu. Web. 24 Mar. 20 15. ital music creation impacts auditory perception of music playback therefore ~1arx. Karl. JWanifesto of the Con1111unist Party: Co1nn1 11nist J\tfa11ifesto. hindering the outcome of the composition. Shields not only is an electronic 335.35:l. Oncourse.iu.ed u.Web. 20 Jan. 2015. 1nusic pioneer. but also is a fen1inist composer and discusses 1he sexism she Olsen. TiJlie. Yonnondio : Fron1 the Thirties. Lincoln: University of Nebras- experienced in tradHional n1usic school at while she ka Press. 2004. Print. studied classical voice. lo contrast, the electronic 1nusic studio acted as a lib- Staub, Michael. '!he Struggle for "Selfness" through Speech in Olsen's erating environn1ent fro,n the outdated thought processes of conservative Yo,1not1dio: Fron1 the ThirNe.s. Studies in A,nerican Fiction 16.2 (1988): music school. Incorporating her study of the Northern and Southern India 131-139. Project Muse. Web. 10 Apr. 20 15. Music raga systen1, Shields uses Eastern n1usic systems currently in her n1u- Williamson, Jenn. "Coming To "Clearness": Olsen's Yomiondio And John- sic v.·riting. An impressive career as a student, composer and Op<.'ra singer. son's Now in November." Women'.< Studies 38.4 (2009): 449-467. Academ- Shields c.areer lhrivcs today as a co1nposer and professor. ic Search Premier. Web. 6 Apr. 2015. 28 Ktdie Lee Art & Lelltrs 29

Alice Shields is an American compos.,r and soprano vocalist performer. She earned her BMA, MM and DMA at Columbia University in . If he (Davidovsky] or Ussachevsky were unavailable, Smiley and Shields has played an instrumental role in developing the Columbia-Prince- Shields would tc-Jch their classes in addition to the considerable ton Electronic Music Lab, a collaboralion beho,1een both universities brought technical instruction the tv.·o "'omen did on their o"'·n. Despite this forth by a Rockefeller grant.' Shields worked at the Jab from 1965 to 1982 as a service, neither v.·oman ,vas ever named a faculty inember al the composer, engineer, teacher and manager. The sound lab started in 1952 and Center. Smiley is listed as a 'clerk' in the employment record while according to Shields, it had four stages: Shields \otas classified as a 'Science Technician u· even after receiv. <·195 t -59, as an independent studio created by Luening and ing her doctorate. Rarely are they mentioned in historical texts as Ussachevsky. in various locations on the Colun1bia campus being a part of the facility though fonner students report that they ·:· 1959-83 officially operated as Columbia -Princeton Electronic put in long hours with extensive duties. Additionally, though they 1Vlusic Studio were eventually listed as 'associate directors: lhis did not affect their ·>1983-94 officially operated as Columbia University Electronic personnel ran.king nor bring with it any more monetary compen· Music Center, under director (after sation.• Ussachevsky's retirement) While Shield's and Smiley's names continue to l>e included in historical ·>1994 to the present as Columbia University Computer Music writings of the Center, their contributions are often whittled do\'ln to short Center' sentences. Ho,V"ever. duiing the interview Shields n1entioned hov.• she \¥ould Shields along with fellow composer and instructor , worked prefer to be remembered in the history of the CPEMC she merely said "as a extensively at the Columbia•Princeton Electronic Music Center also kno,,,,n composer:$ nothing more. as CPEMC, running day-to-day operations as well as making groundbreaking Shields may have had second billing at CPEMC. however she describes works. CPEMC expanded Shields as a musical artist. Shields entered Colum- a culture buzzing \\•ith life and community: .. The enonuous artistic energy bia University to study classical vocal performance found herself composing that was bursting forth in New York City made the CPEMC an exciting place and teaching. to be, full of wildly different styles of music, and some wildly creative people According to scholar Elizabeth Hinkle-Turner, at CPF.MC men were well rarely glimpsed in academic setting.... Ussachevsky's leadership created a for- paid and given prestigious titles. In contrast, Shields and Smiley rarely paid ~-ard·thinking atinosphere conducive to curiosity and creativity at CPEMC. for their work and given titles beneath their duties while both taught most the complete opposite of the sexist and stiff music department at Columbia of the classes. Compared to Pauline Oliveros at Mills College, who received University. Shields describes the world outside of the electronic studio as iso- equal billing and pay as her male peers, Columbia's treatment towards lating and bleak: "My peers at that time were all men - none were of any help Shields appears degrading. Unlike Mills College, Columbia's administration to me as a developing compos.,r. Few were at all friendly, unless they had ro- had a standoffish attitude towards the CPMEC. Sometimes the administration mantic intentions:.,. Shields describes a heartbreaking scenario, yet one that would be willing to help, yet most of the time everyone at the lab was on their may persist in some institutions today. O\\rn to raise funds and scrap cQncert.~ together.} While the technology remained expensive and only in the hands of Ii- In her book, ·women Composer and Technology in the United States" Elizabeth Hinkle-Turner points out Shield's major contributions to CPMEC 4. Hinkle•Turner. FJjzabcth. \Vomen ComposM and fi,func Technology In dte United mean,vhile given sideline credit: States: Cro$$lng the Line. AJdershot. England: A$hg:ue, 21.

5. Shields. Alice. Fron1 entail interview, November 2017. I. Paitterson. Nick. "The Ar..:hi"\-'ts o( the Columbia·Princeton E.Jectronic Music Center." 6. Cluck, Robert I, "'The Columbia.Princeton Electronic ti.iusic Qnttr: Educating Inter· lo/otes. vol. 67, no. 3, 20l I. JSTOR. www.jstor.org/stablt/230Il7?6. 483. national Composers.." Computer ~has.c Journal, vol. 31, no. 2, 2001, JSTOR. www.;stor, 2. Patterson, 433. otg/st>bl,/40072S74, 20-2 l.

3. Patterson, 489. 7.SMeld~ 30 Katie Lee Art & Letters 31 nancially-endov.·cd institutions and ind ividuals. those "''ho ,,,rould thrive would recognize music technology needed future minds fueled with the The sexism \\•as and is very strong. It is true that there are some proper amounts of creativity, curiosity and patience. For Shields. Ussa- younger ,vomen "'ho have gained some recognition and good fac- chevsky created this idea into a culture at CPEMC: ulty jobs. but there are fe\ver \Vo1nan co,nposers· \vorks now· being Because of Prof. Vladimir Ussachevs~-y. who was the founder played by U.S. orchestras than there were about IO years ago. And and director of the Colu1nbia-Princeton Electronic Music Cen- no"' that 1 an1 older. sexis,n and agcisn1 co1nbined is a po\verful ter, the Center \\fas a friendly and musicalJy nurturing place. opponent.rn and drew me away from the cold, unfriendly atmosphere of the Age and gender act as obstacles for Shields in the world instrumental com- main Columbia campus and the Music Dept. at Columbia. I did position. not at the 1i me recognize that a lot of this coldness ,,.•as because for many female con1posers., electronic music offers freedom from the I was a v.·oman; I just felt un,.,elcome. did not know ,vhy. and confining \\IOrld of traditional instturnental music. The tools allotted for elec- assu1ned I ,,.•as in some ,vay not good enough to be a Jne1nber tronic n1usic allO\\' composers to construct and mix solo. Shields also found of the group of male peers and male professors. It was very dif- the medium of electronic music to be liberating: "recording technology and ferent at the Electronic Music Center 9 blocks away. Prof. Us- electronic music freed me fron1 the rejection of the "''hite males \vho did and sache\•sky ,.,as ,,.•arm and cordial to everyone, male and fen)ale, still do large!)• control the larger performances of instrumental music and and invited composers from all over the \\fOrld to create ntusic rarticularly the performance of opera.s:• 11 Shields, freed from white males there. He seemed to ha\'e no illusions that \o.'0111en , ..·e re any dif.. who control the platforms for instrumental, pushes boundaries by perform- ferent front n\en in ternls of degrees of intelligence and possible ing and composing with her voice. As Cathy Lane brilliantly states in her talent. I attribute this to his having been taught music as a child article •Why Not Our Voices?~ the act of Shields using her 0\.\'11 voice in her and young man by his mother, and that he had admired and music is a political act: then rnarried the brilliant and literate Elizabeth Kray, an im· Women sound artists use voices. their 0\.\'11 and others: in \Va)'S that portant adnlinistrator in 20th·century American poetry circles. subvert commonly held historic, sociocultural prejudices against Ussachevksy had no prejudice against \ ..·omen as intellectuals or the existence of \vOmen's voices in public spaces. Sound art, per- composers, and I fell welcome and appreciated.' haps because of its relatively emergent status as a genre or because In fact, Shields credits Ussachevsky as a catalyst for composing: of its essentially ethereal, d iscrnbodied. nonn1aterial nature. pro- ~1y ntentor Ussachevsky was critlcally important to my be- vides a space in which women feel that they can be and have a right coming a con1poser. First, his excellent course in 16th-Cer\tury to be heard. The recorded speaking voice is decoupled from the Species Counterpoint showed me immediately, like in a flash of physical body and becomes 'liberated: allm,;ng women sound art· light, hov.• to contpose, inspired by his 1nusical analysis of Gre- ists to explore their own voices, both to critique existing political gorian melodic patterns. Second, but almost as important, he and cultural realities and create visions of ne\01 sonic utopias.1i \vas a kind and \varm person, welcoming to \o/On1en.' Shields continues to sing in her electronic operas, in various languages Shields has stated that electronic music is ,nore liberating than instru- in sonic worlds she builds herself, and allows the work to accessible to n1ental ntusic. \i\'hile there has been progress for women in music, prej- audiences. udices and social constructs continue to exclude female con1posers frorn traditional instrurner1tal ,nusic. Shields cornn1ents on her experience in IO. Shields. instruntental music: 11. Shield$.

12. Lane, C. '"Wb)' Nol Our Vo1c-es?" \'Vomen and Muslc: A Journal of Gender and O.il· 8. Shields. turt, vol. 20, 2016, PR.>je(.1 f\.lUSE, dol;l0,1353/wam.2016.0006, 109. 9. Shields. ~

32 Katie l..tt Art c- Letters 33

Shields compositional process is not only disciplined, but very meticulous. velop it with process verses using synth machine. Shields prefers developing Committed to developing her own timbres rather than packaged timbres notes personally rather than using synth.s: conlained \o/ilhin progranls such as logic, Shields composes her electronic Donald Buchla, after consulting with , had 1nusic one note at a time: just completed an early version of his synthesizer. and sent it to the I typically construct one note at a time until I am pleased with Center. Ussachevsky taught, ---and this is what I learned, taught, the timbre, and tl1en develop how best that can be used in a piece. and still use \-Vilh computer music . ... creating each note, one af- 'Ihe methods ofcreat ing the sound are the same as in my previous ter the other, refining for each note all the parameters of sound: ana.log electronic composition, 1A•hich v.·as from electronic sound pitch. duration, envelope, volu,ne, tempo, rhythm, timbre, spatial sources (\vaveform generators), or from recordings of natural distribution. Ready-made sounds as they came out of a synthesizer sounds, or fron, rny voice. Tn 1ny current work I can create one were considered boustic Musk." from the loudspeakers. But in computer music, while listening, my N~wMus1cUSA. bttps:/1 ll.nlb1.newn1usicusa.org/s1ructural ·and·playback -issues· in -cur- rent-electroacQlL~t ic-musi-c/ 9 lune 2016. Accessed November 2017. Js. Shields. 34 Katit Lee Art & Letters 35

visual focus is typically ftxed in one place, on the progran1 rm using In addition to being a virti.1oso soprano and composer, Shields also works on screen, or focused on other visuaJ distractions on the screen. l as a librettist, v.•riting text for operas, and has been noted for her cross-cultur- find fu

directed ar,n moven1ents and the two 4 string problen1, our results to absorb the melodic system. That has very much influenced all suggest that actions did implicitly guide thoughts." work I've \lfritten since. \Vhat studied \'las entirely traditional fo rn)s. As a composer, Shields has experience working with analog and computer During that time I got to see the process used by Indian master based tools. Her statements on bodily move,nent v.·hile co1nposing serves as a.rtists-composcr, singer and Jead dancer- ,\Then they create new encouragen1ent for con1posers to ren)ember, "'Actions guide our thoughts." ,.,orks \~'ithin these traditional forms. AU of the process is different Adding gestures and moven1cnts ,.,hile ,..,orking at computers may improve compositional choices. 18. Du.st,Arnngi,am,http,J~,,m,oo,1lllntrol/6.til/dustl,m-NO\\'ll1bc:r24.2017.

19. Muni1../"!1", "Musicofb,d;./'S,,n,eyefed-.c Mu,,c. August2017. lndiana Unh"""Y Sru!h llcnd 16. Shields. 20. OiurtrX'}< Dmid "North and Sru!h 1.-.l;on 0.'IS!lal Musk"~ t.q,JJwww.indiana,n- I?. Thomas, Laul'a E.. "Swinging Into thought: Dlr«ted movement guide$ insight in prob- •,ryro,nlnlUSialorth.lim -NO\sychonomic hullctin & review, 1,•o). 16, 2009. 721. 36 Katie Lu

than \.Yestetncompositional techniques. That \\fasa precious expe­ rience.21

Shields is known as an eleclrOnic composer. However, while her tools may be programs such as Avid Protocols, Shields' approach to electronic media remains rooted in the school of music concrete, using recorded sound� as audio materials. Shields discussed composing note by note to alter timbre rather than use sound readily available in a packaged program. Shields main· tains that while she has used synthesizers in tlie past, she actually dislikes their sounds. Her voice oftenacts as her raw materiaJ as a basis in many of her noted works. Shields consistently pushes herselfas an artist into complex subject matter such as writiJ>g an opera as a feminist retelling of Chaucer� Troilus and Criseyde, sung in Middle English." Shields not only pushes the boundaries of context but also the content of the librettos she writes. An accomplished opera singer, composer, and professor, Shields continues to set the bar high for all musical professionals.

21. Sludds.

22. '"Reviews."' Af,etSl11dd,, h.Hp:/lwww.aJiceshidds.com/rc..,icws.html. AccessedNovem• ber 26. 2017.