DOCSLIB.ORG

FINANCIAL COLLAPSE of ENRON—Part 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FINANCIAL COLLAPSE of ENRON—Part 4 THE FINANCIAL COLLAPSE OF ENRON—Part 4 HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION MARCH 14, 2002 Serial No. 107–90 Printed for the use of the Committee on Energy and Commerce ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/house U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 78–506CC WASHINGTON : 2002 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Jun 13 2002 08:36 Jul 17, 2002 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 W:\DISC\78506 pfrm17 PsN: 78506 COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE W.J. ‘‘BILLY’’ TAUZIN, Louisiana, Chairman MICHAEL BILIRAKIS, Florida JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan JOE BARTON, Texas HENRY A. WAXMAN, California FRED UPTON, Michigan EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts CLIFF STEARNS, Florida RALPH M. HALL, Texas PAUL E. GILLMOR, Ohio RICK BOUCHER, Virginia JAMES C. GREENWOOD, Pennsylvania EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York CHRISTOPHER COX, California FRANK PALLONE, Jr., New Jersey NATHAN DEAL, Georgia SHERROD BROWN, Ohio RICHARD BURR, North Carolina BART GORDON, Tennessee ED WHITFIELD, Kentucky PETER DEUTSCH, Florida GREG GANSKE, Iowa BOBBY L. RUSH, Illinois CHARLIE NORWOOD, Georgia ANNA G. ESHOO, California BARBARA CUBIN, Wyoming BART STUPAK, Michigan JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York HEATHER WILSON, New Mexico TOM SAWYER, Ohio JOHN B. SHADEGG, Arizona ALBERT R. WYNN, Maryland CHARLES ‘‘CHIP’’ PICKERING, Mississippi GENE GREEN, Texas VITO FOSSELLA, New York KAREN MCCARTHY, Missouri ROY BLUNT, Missouri TED STRICKLAND, Ohio TOM DAVIS, Virginia DIANA DEGETTE, Colorado ED BRYANT, Tennessee THOMAS M. BARRETT, Wisconsin ROBERT L. EHRLICH, Jr., Maryland BILL LUTHER, Minnesota STEVE BUYER, Indiana LOIS CAPPS, California GEORGE RADANOVICH, California MICHAEL F. DOYLE, Pennsylvania CHARLES F. BASS, New Hampshire CHRISTOPHER JOHN, Louisiana JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania JANE HARMAN, California MARY BONO, California GREG WALDEN, Oregon LEE TERRY, Nebraska — — (Vacancy) DAVID V. MARVENTANO, Staff Director JAMES D. BARNETTE, General Counsel REID P.F. STUNTZ, Minority Staff Director and Chief Counsel SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS JAMES C. GREENWOOD, Pennsylvania, Chairman MICHAEL BILIRAKIS, Florida PETER DEUTSCH, Florida CLIFF STEARNS, Florida BART STUPAK, Michigan PAUL E. GILLMOR, Ohio TED STRICKLAND, Ohio RICHARD BURR, North Carolina DIANA DEGETTE, Colorado ED WHITFIELD, Kentucky CHRISTOPHER JOHN, Louisiana Vice Chairman BOBBY L. RUSH, Illinois CHARLES F. BASS, New Hampshire JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan, — — (Vacancy) (Ex Officio) W.J. ‘‘BILLY’’ TAUZIN, Louisiana (Ex Officio) (II) 2 VerDate Jun 13 2002 08:36 Jul 17, 2002 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 W:\DISC\78506 pfrm17 PsN: 78506 C O N T E N T S Page Testimony of: Astin, Ronald T., Partner, Vinson & Elkins, L.L.P ....................................... 15 Derrick, James V., Jr., Former General Counsel, Enron Corporation ......... 16 Dilg, Joseph C., Managing Partner, Vinson & Elkins, L.L.P ....................... 19 Rogers, Rex R., Vice President and Associate General Counsel, Enron Corporation .................................................................................................... 15 Sefton, Scott M., former General Counsel, Enron Global Finance, Enron Corporation .................................................................................................... 15 St. Clair, Carol L., former Assistant General Counsel, ECT Resources Group, Enron Corporation ............................................................................ 22 (III) 3 VerDate Jun 13 2002 08:36 Jul 17, 2002 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 W:\DISC\78506 pfrm17 PsN: 78506 VerDate Jun 13 2002 08:36 Jul 17, 2002 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 W:\DISC\78506 pfrm17 PsN: 78506 FINANCIAL COLLAPSE OF ENRON CORPORA- TION, WITH FOCUS ON ENRON’S INSIDE AND OUTSIDE COUNSEL THURSDAY, MARCH 14, 2002 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE, SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS, Washington, DC. The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 10 a.m., in room 2322, Rayburn House Office Building, James C. Greenwood (chair- man) presiding. Members present: Representatives Greenwood, Stearns, Burr, Whitfield, Bass, Tauzin (ex officio), Deutsch, Stupak, Strickland, DeGette, and Dingell (ex officio). Also present: Representatives Markey, Green, and Waxman. Staff present: Tom Dilenge, majority counsel; Mark Paoletta, ma- jority counsel; Brendan Williams, legislative clerk; Mike Geffroy, majority counsel; Will Carty, legislative clerk; Peter Kielty, legisla- tive clerk; Shannon Vildostegui, majority counsel; David Cavicke, majority counsel; Brian McCullough, majority professional staff; Edith Holleman, minority counsel; Consuela Washington, minority counsel; Chris Knauer, minority investigator; and Jonathan Cordone, minority counsel. Mr. GREENWOOD. The hearing will come to order. Witnesses may be seated at the table. Good morning and wel- come to the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations’ ongo- ing inquiry into the financial collapse of the Enron Corporation. Today we are going to examine elements of Enron’s structure of corporate governance. The words ‘‘corporate governance’’ describe the entire architecture of how a modern corporation is managed on behalf of its investors and stockholders, its customers, and its em- ployees. This encompasses executives at every level, corporate accounting teams, corporate counsel, senior managers, and the Board of Direc- tors. It also includes the outside expert advice, often consultants, attorneys, and accountants, that senior management, the Board of Directors, or the Audit Committee of the Board retained to provide advice on a wide array of issues. These issues ranged from human resources to tax analyses to producing an audited financial state- ment. Up to this point, our work has focused primarily on what went wrong at Enron. Through our work we have been able to cast a considerable amount of light on the people and transactions behind (1) VerDate Jun 13 2002 08:36 Jul 17, 2002 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 W:\DISC\78506 pfrm17 PsN: 78506 2 this company’s unparalleled failure. As a result of this effort, we have been able to slowly parse the complex of self-dealing trans- actions that contributed to Enron’s dramatic descent into bank- ruptcy. We have also acquired a more complete understanding of how these highly irregular transactions were cloaked behind a curtain of nearly impenetrable financial arrangements. We know much more, too, about the individuals who devised and implemented these schemes. And it becomes increasingly clear that the collapse of Enron, which was greeted with such surprise by investors, shareholders, customers, analysts, and employees alike, was more than mere happenstance. Instead, a complex infrastructure of ill-defined part- nerships, hedges, collars, and various other off-the-books trans- actions were purposefully designed to mislead shareholders about Enron’s precarious financial position. Phantom assets and phantom earnings were created in order to create phantom wealth. Sadly, the investors and employees who risked their fortunes and their futures were very real, and they suffered very real losses. Among the many mysteries yet surrounding this collapse, one in particular has emerged. What role, whether by omission, commis- sion, did Enron’s corporate governance team play in the slide into bankruptcy and the increasing reliance on riskier and riskier trans- actions to keep Enron afloat? It is especially important to undertake this examination, since we now know that many of the seeds of this particular financial tragedy were sewn years ago. How is it, then, that the Board of Di- rectors and senior management failed to red flag flagrant issues of conflict of interest and highly questionable transactions behind sev- eral key partnerships, such as the Chewco deal and the various LJM associated transactions? What we have discovered to date amounts to a systemic failure on the part of Enron’s legal and accounting personnel, as well as outside counsel and accountants, both to discover these problems and to warn of their dangers. Clearly, no actions were taken to pre- vent the ensuing disaster. A few courageous individuals attempted to raise the alarm, but either their warnings came too late or too half-heartedly. Or per- haps the right people didn’t hear the alarms. This disserving situation brings us to the question at hand today. Where were the faithful stewards of Enron? In particular, where were the people whose fiduciary duty it was to guard against hid- den dangers and to protect the interests of Enron and its share- holders? Where were the professionals whose job it was to ferret out wrongdoing and guard against malfeasance? What, if any, ac- tions did they either take or recommend to put an end to those ir- responsible actions which eventually led to Enron’s demise? This phase of our hearing involves the people who were paid to have known better, and who should have done more, much more, the accountants and lawyers. Next week we will have a chance to hear from the accountants. This morning we have before us the at- torneys, Enron’s inside and outside counsel. VerDate Jun 13 2002 08:36 Jul 17, 2002
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Securities Whistleblowing Under Dodd-Frank: Neglecting the Power of “Enterprising Privateers” in Favor of the “Slow-Going Public Vessel”
    Do Not Delete 2/14/2012 1:27 PM SECURITIES WHISTLEBLOWING UNDER DODD-FRANK: NEGLECTING THE POWER OF “ENTERPRISING PRIVATEERS” IN FAVOR OF THE “SLOW-GOING PUBLIC VESSEL” by Michael Neal∗ This Note analyzes the SEC whistleblower program, as modified by the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010. It reviews the history of whistleblowing-like statutes in the United States and analyzes the successes and failures of prior whistleblowers after dividing them into two mutually exclusive groups: Insiders, those who are employed by the company against whom they report; and Outsiders, non-employees. The Note concludes that the new SEC whistleblower program is deficient in two ways. First, it does not create an affirmative duty for Insiders to internally report when their employer has a functioning compliance department; and second, Outsiders lack an offensive private cause of action granting them standing to sue on behalf of the SEC. The Note recommends changes to the program that resolve these deficiencies and better align the SEC’s required functions with its resources. The Note concludes that, as enacted, the SEC whistleblower program encourages the avoidance of internal corporate compliance systems, externalizes corporate compliance to a regulatory body already struggling to provide adequate oversight, weakens the partnership between the regulator and the regulated, and has the potential of reversing the positive progression in corporate cultures developed over the past decade. I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 1108 II. U.S. INFORMANT PROGRAMS ................................................. 1110 A. Stealing from the Government—The False Claims Act ................ 1110 B. The IRS Informant Program—“The Reward for Rats” ............... 1114 C. The SEC Informant Program ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sherron Watkins and Whistle Blowing at Enron Ethics of 3
    BUSINESS Cases in Corporate Ethics: Contemporary Challenges and Imperatives; Strategy & General Management, Ethics and Social Justice, Organizational Behavior, Human Resource, Operations, Finance and Accounting, Marketing and Sales. Case 2.3: Sherron Watkins and Whistle Blowing at Enron Ozzie Mascarenhas SJ, PhD DRD Tata Chair Professor of Business Ethics, XLRI Jamshedpur, India | Published: June 2015 | Redistribution or use without the expressed, written permission of The Global Jesuit Case Series is prohibited. For information on usage rights, contact the Global Jesuit Case Series at [email protected] ________________________________________________________________________ Cases in Corporate Ethics: Contemporary Challenges and Imperatives Jesuit Series, Madden School of Business, Le Moyne College, Syracuse, NY Donated by: Ozzie Mascarenhas SJ, PhD JRD Tata Chair Professor of Business Ethics, XLRI, Jamshedpur, India June 15, 2015 The fifteen cases in Business ethics included here represent the first installment of the thirty cases promised to the Cases in Business Ethics – The Jesuit Series at the University of Le Moyne, Syracuse, NY. We have added three more. The remaining eighteen cases will follow shortly. The thirty three cases illustrate and depend upon the content of corporate ethics outlined in Table 1. As might be clear from Table I, the Course in Corporate Ethics has three parts: Part One explores the ethical quality of moral agents embedded in the capitalist markets such as the human person, the fraud-prone person, the virtuous actor (virtue ethics) and the trusting executive (ethics of trust). Part Two investigates the ethical quality of moral agencies of executive decisions, choices and actions when supported by ethics of critical thinking, moral reasoning, ethics of rights and duties, and ethics of moral leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Enron Vice President Sherron Watkins on the Enron Collapse
    UC Irvine UC Irvine Previously Published Works Title Former Enron vice president Sherron Watkins on the Enron collapse Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9pb4r7nj Journal Academy of Management Executive, 17(4) ISSN 1079-5545 Author Pearce, JL Publication Date 2003 DOI 10.5465/ame.2003.11851888 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ? Academy of Management Executive, 2003, Vol. 17, No. 4 Former Enron vice president Sherron Watkins on the Enron collapse Academy Address, August 3, 2003, by Sherron Watkins Introduction to the address by Academy President Jone L. Pearce It is my pleasure to introduce Sherron Watkins, the Academy of Management's 2003 Distinguished Executive Speaker. By now, her story as the former vice president of Enron Corporation who tried to bring what she called "an elaborate accounting hoax" to the attention of Enron's chief executive officer is well known. In August 2001, responding to his invitation to employees to put any concerns in a comment box, she did so. When he did not address her explosive charges at a subsequent company-wide meeting, she sought a face-to-face meeting with him. A month later the CEO announced to employees that "our financial liquidity has never been stronger," while exercising his own $1.5 billion in stock options, just ahead of the company's announcement of a $618 million quarterly loss. When United States Congressional investigators uncovered her letter buried in boxes of documents, they brought Ms. Watkins before the United States Senate in February 2002 to testify about her warnings.
    [Show full text]
  • HILDER & ASSOCIATES, PC Attorneys for Sherron Watkins 819 Lovett Blvd Houston, Texas 77006 Office
    HILDER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Attorneys for Sherron Watkins 819 Lovett Blvd Houston, Texas 77006 Office (713) 655-9111 Facsimile (713) 655-9112 Philip H. Hilder Edgar A. Goldberg, Of Counsel UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------x : In re : Chapter 11 : ENRON CORP., et al., : Case No. 01-16034 (AJG) : : Jointly Administered Debtors. : --------------------------------------------------------------------x REVISED FINAL FEE APPLICATION OF PHILIP HILDER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. FOR ALLOWANCE OF COMPENSATION FROM DECEMBER 10, 2001 THROUGH NOVEMBER 15, 2002 TO THE HONORABLE ARTHUR J. GONZALEZ, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE: 1. Philip Hilder as Philip Hilder & Associates, P.C. (“Hilder”) counsel for Sherron Watkins, files this Revised Final Fee Application for Allowance of Compensation (the “Application”) for the period from December 10, 2001 through November 15, 2002 (the “Application Period”). STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION 2. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§§ 1334 and 157 and Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 5005. This matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B). This motion arises under 11 U.S.C. §§ 327(e), 328(a), 105a, 503 and 330. REVISED FINAL FEE APPLICATION OF PHILIP HILDER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. FOR ALLOWANCE OF COMPENSATION FROM DECEMBER 10, 2001 THROUGH NOVEMBER 15, 2002 PAGE 1 FACTUAL BACKGROUND 3. Sherron S. Watkins was a Vice President of Corporate Development, Enron Corporation (‘Debtors”). Ms. Watkins sounded the alarm having warned Ken Lay that Enron “might implode in a wave of accounting scandals”. Ms. Watkins disclosed the Debtors’ financial improprieties to her colleagues and the authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Political Science Their Community
    Department of Political Science _______________________ College of Arts and Sciences Faculty Sean Evans (2000). Associate Professor of Political Science and Department Chair. B.A., David Lipscomb Uni ver si ty; M.A., University of Alabama; Ph.D., University of Colorado. Ed Bryant (2004). Lecturer in Political Science and Special Assistant to the President. B.A. and J.D., University of Mississippi. PO Kevin J. Cooney (2004). Associate Professor of Political Science. B.A., Oral Roberts University; M.A., Lancaster LIT I University, England; Ph.D., Arizona State University. CAL SCI CAL Micah Watson (2007). Assistant Professor of Political Science and Director, Center for Religion and Politics. B.A., ENCE University of California at Davis; M.A., Baylor University; Ph.D., Princeton University. Mission Statement The Department of Political Science seeks to create active, informed citizens and leaders who use their analytical, research, and communication skills to improve their community. Curriculum Called the "queen of the sciences" by Aristotle because of its impact on law, society, philosophy, ethics, econom- ics, and religion, political science is more than the study of government, political attitudes and behavior, and public policy. It is the study of people, their motives, their values, their relations with others, and the best way for individuals and groups to achieve their goals while improving society. Moreover, as Christians, the study of politics increases our understanding of God by learning how He wants us to live with others and
    [Show full text]
  • Aug 3, 2006 Election Results
    Aug 3, 2006 Election Results Race Primary Candidates Paper Absentee Early ElectionTotal Votes GOVERNOR DEM Phil Bredesen 0 75 746 2366 3187 DEM John Jay Hooker 0 13 24 128 165 DEM Tim Sevier 0 3 11 63 77 DEM Walt Ward 0 1 10 30 41 UNITED STATES SENATE DEM Gary G. Davis 0 13 45 178 236 DEM Harold Ford, Jr. 0 50 671 2115 2836 DEM John Jay Hooker 0 13 29 116 158 DEM Charles E. Smith 0 3 21 69 93 DEM Al Strauss 0 2 3 20 25 UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2nd Congressional District DEM John Greene 0 35 353 1041 1429 DEM Robert R. Scott 0 25 223 740 988 STATE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEEMAN 8th Senatorial District DEM Daniel J. Lawson 0 56 488 1355 1899 GOVERNOR REP Mark Albertini 0 11 126 321 458 REP Wayne Thomas Bailey 0 14 128 343 485 REP Jim Bryson 0 42 845 2193 3080 REP David M. Farmer 0 21 256 813 1090 REP Joe Kirkpatrick 0 16 202 687 905 REP Timothy Thomas 0 4 82 258 344 REP Wayne Young 0 14 123 481 618 UNITED STATES SENATE REP Ed Bryant 0 31 747 2354 3132 REP Bob Corker 1 89 1516 4275 5881 REP Tate Harrison 0 5 27 140 172 REP Van Hilleary 1 66 376 1376 1819 UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2nd Congressional District REP John J. Duncan, Jr. 2 173 2324 7159 9658 REP Ralph McGill 0 22 318 936 1276 TENNESSEE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 8th Representative District REP Joe McCord 1 37 875 3085 3998 TENNESSEE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 20th Representative District REP Doug Overbey 1 122 1460 3974 5557 STATE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEEMAN 8th Senatorial District REP Thomas E.
    [Show full text]
  • National Whistleblower Day 2019
    PRESS KIT NATIONAL WHISTLEBLOWER DAY 2019 DIRKSEN SENATE OFFICE BUILDING Washington, D.C. | July 30, 2019 11:00AM - 1:30PM National Whistleblower Center 1875 Connecticut Ave. NW, 10th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20009 • [email protected] 202 342 1903 • www.whistleblowers.org 1 Speaker Biographies Jane Turner | Former FBI Agent | Master of Ceremonies Jane Turner worked for 25 years as a Special Agent for the FBI. She is one of the only FBI agents to win a lawsuit under the FBI Whistleblower Protection Act based on retaliation for exposing theft at the 9/11 crime scene. In a second whistleblower case, a jury in Minnesota found the FBI liable for retaliating against her in a sex discrimination lawsuit and awarded her the maximum damages permitted under law. Senator Charles E. Grassley | iowa | Keynote Speaker Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is a devoted champion of government accountability. Throughout his time in Congress, he has worked to empower whistleblowers to shine a light on fraud, inefficien- cies, or misconduct in government. Grassley, author of numerous whistleblower protection laws, is also founder and chairman of the bipartisan Senate Whistleblower Protection Caucus, which raises awareness about the need for adequate protections against retaliation for private sector and govern- ment employees who call attention to wrongdoing. Senator Ron Wyden | Oregon Senator Ron Wyden, (D-Oregon), one of the Senate’s foremost defenders of Americans’ rights and civil liberties, continues to fight back against government overreach and abuse. Wyden was elected to U.S. Senate in 1996, where he now serves as Ranking Member on the Senate Finance Committee, and as a senior member of the Senate Intelligence Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes the Scope of Protected Activity Under Section 806
    NOTES THE SCOPE OF PROTECTED ACTIVITY UNDER SECTION 806 OF SOX Timothy J. Fitzmaurice* Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) created a new federal anti-retaliation protection for corporate whistleblowers. Initially, the Department of Labor Administrative Review Board (ARB) and federal courts limited the scope of section 806 by holding that a whistleblower must report conduct that “definitively and specifically” relates to a violation of one of the rules, regulations, or laws listed in section 806 to engage in protected activity. Recently, however, the ARB abandoned this approach, and held that a whistleblower engages in protected activity under section 806 when she reports information that she “reasonably believes” relates to a violation of one of the rules, regulations, or laws listed in section 806. The ARB’s decision to adopt the “reasonably believes” standard should be entitled to Chevron deference. However, empirical studies indicate that in cases where Chevron should apply, courts engage in ad hoc statutory interpretation nearly as often as they defer to the agency decision. This Note argues that in the foreseeable event that a court neglects Chevron and engages in ad hoc statutory interpretation the reasonably believes standard should govern the scope of protected activity under section 806 for several reasons. First, the definitively and specifically standard conflicts with the text of section 806. Second, the legislative history of section 806 supports the reasonably believes standard. Third, the reasonably believes standard is more consistent with the reasonable person standard that Congress intended. Finally, the reasonably believes standard serves two important public policy goals: harmonizing the protected activity standards under SOX and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and helping to remedy the lack of success whistleblowers have had using section 806’s anti-retaliation protections.
    [Show full text]
  • Moratorium on Recycling Contaminated Nickel
    'Il EDO Principal Correspondence Control FROM: DUE: 08/11/00 EDO CONTROL: G20000376 DOC DT: 07/13/00 FINAL REPLY: Senator Fred Thompson Dennis Rathbun, OCA FOR SIGNATURE OF : ** GRN ** CRC NO: 00-0498 Travers, EDO DESC: ROUTING: Moratorium on Recycling Contaminated Nickel Travers Paperiello Miraglia Norry Craig Burns/Cyr DATE: 08/02/00 Reyes, RII ASSIGNED TO: CONTACT: NMSS Kane SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS: T•,.9Ik-Q.'. S•F--'- 11 E-12(ts: SECY-0 I .. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET Date Printed:Aug 02, 2000 09:56 PAPER NUMBER: LTR-00-0498 LOGGING DATE: 07/31/2000 ACTION OFFICE: EDO AUTHOR: FRED THOMPSON AFFILIATION: SEN ADDRESSEE: DENNIS RATHBUN SUBJECT: MORATORIUM ON RECYCLING CONTAMINATED NICKEL FROM THE K-25 PLANT IN OAK RIDGE, TN ACTION: Signature of EDO DISTRIBUTION: LETTER DATE: 07/13/2000 ACKNOWLEDGED No SPECIAL HANDLING: OCA TO ACK NOTES: FILE LOCATION: ADAMS DATE DUE: ooft*wm 01sloo DATE SIGNED: EDO -- G20000376 COMMITTEES: "•%-.--) THOMPSON TENNESSEE CHAIRMAN. GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS FINANCE rnite StateO Senate WASHINGTON. DC 20510-4204 http:/fthompson.senate.gov July 13, 2000 Mr. Dennis K. Rathbun Director Office of Congressional Affairs Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Dear Mr. Rathbun: I am writing on behalf of Glenn Bell regarding his concerns about the moratorium on recycling contaminated nickel from the former K-25 plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. I have enclosed a copy of Mr. Bell's correspondence for your review. I would appreciate your taking the time to look into this situation and to respond to Mr. Bell's specific concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • Whistleblowing at Work: Ethical and Juridical Issues
    UNIVERSITÀ CARLO CATTANEO - LIUC FACOLTA’ DI GIURISPRUDENZA Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Giurisprudenza - classe 22/S WHISTLEBLOWING AT WORK: ETHICAL AND JURIDICAL ISSUES Relatore: Prof.ssa Claudia Rimoldi Correlatore: Prof. Mario Zanchetti Tesi di Laurea di: Giorgio Fraschini matr. 10045 Anno Accademico 2006-2007 A mamma e papà TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………..1 Chapter 1. Whistleblowing: a preliminary outlook………………………………………...…3 Chapter 2. Whistleblowing: an ethical approach..……………………………………….….11 Chapter 3. United States Legislation…………………………………………………………21 3.1 The Sarbanes-Oxley Act………………………………………………………………….…22 3.2 Whistleblowing before the SOX……………………………………………………………25 3.3 SOX complaints and investigations…………………………………………………………27 3.4 SOX discovery and hearings………………………………………………………………..29 3.5 SOX Appeals……………………………………………………………………………..…31 3.6 Proof of discrimination……………………………………………………………………...33 3.7 Protected Activities………………………………………………………………………....36 3.8 The “reasonable belief” standard…………………………………………………………....38 3.9 Adverse action……………………………………………………………………………....39 3.10 Damages…………………………………………………………………………………...40 3.11 Attorney fees and costs………………………………………………………………….....43 3.12 Settlement of SOX complaints…………………………………………………………….44 3.13 Attorneys as whistleblowers…………………………………………………………….....46 3.14 Audit Committees and Corporate Employee Concerns Programs………………………...48 3.15 Criminal Sanctions for Retaliation…………………………………………………….…..51 Chapter 4. United Kingdom legislation………………………………………………………53 4.1
    [Show full text]
  • CHANGING the EQUATION ARTTABLE CHANGING the EQUATION WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP in the VISUAL ARTS | 1980 – 2005 Contents
    CHANGING THE EQUATION ARTTABLE CHANGING THE EQUATION WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP IN THE VISUAL ARTS | 1980 – 2005 Contents 6 Acknowledgments 7 Preface Linda Nochlin This publication is a project of the New York Communications Committee. 8 Statement Lila Harnett Copyright ©2005 by ArtTable, Inc. 9 Statement All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted Diane B. Frankel by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or information retrieval system, without written permission from the publisher. 11 Setting the Stage Published by ArtTable, Inc. Judith K. Brodsky Barbara Cavaliere, Managing Editor Renée Skuba, Designer Paul J. Weinstein Quality Printing, Inc., NY, Printer 29 “Those Fantastic Visionaries” Eleanor Munro ArtTable, Inc. 37 Highlights: 1980–2005 270 Lafayette Street, Suite 608 New York, NY 10012 Tel: (212) 343-1430 [email protected] www.arttable.org 94 Selection of Books HE WOMEN OF ARTTABLE ARE CELEBRATING a joyous twenty-fifth anniversary Acknowledgments Preface together. Together, the members can look back on years of consistent progress HE INITIAL IMPETUS FOR THIS BOOK was ArtTable’s 25th Anniversary. The approaching milestone set T and achievement, gained through the cooperative efforts of all of them. The us to thinking about the organization’s history. Was there a story to tell beyond the mere fact of organization started with twelve members in 1980, after the Women’s Art Movement had Tsustaining a quarter of a century, a story beyond survival and self-congratulation? As we rifled already achieved certain successes, mainly in the realm of women artists, who were through old files and forgotten photographs, recalling the organization’s twenty-five years of professional showing more widely and effectively, and in that of feminist art historians, who had networking and the remarkable women involved in it, a larger picture emerged.
    [Show full text]
  • A RESOLUTION to Honor Marsha Blackburn for Meritorious Service As the U.S
    Filed for intro on 05/21/2003 HOUSE RESOLUTION 189 By Stanley A RESOLUTION to honor Marsha Blackburn for meritorious service as the U.S. Representative for the 7th District. WHEREAS, it is fitting that the members of this Body should recognize those fellow legislators who have performed their elected duties with dedication to their respective communities and to this great State, and who have gone on admirably to perform further political offices; and WHEREAS, Senator Marsha Blackburn’s career in the General Assembly came to an end at the adjournment of the 2002 Session of the 102nd General Assembly, when she announced her intent to run for the Seventh Congressional Seat in the United States Congress; and WHEREAS, upon being elected to this highly prestigious office, Representative Blackburn was sworn in on January 7, 2003, and is already making her presence felt in our U.S. House of Representatives; and HR0189 00272284 -1- WHEREAS, a native of Laurel, Mississippi, Rep. Blackburn began her political career by helping establish the Young Republicans Club in Williamson County in the mid-1970s; being involved in her community initially sparked her interest in politics and motivated her to make a difference; and WHEREAS, Marsha Blackburn’s service to the citizens and State of Tennessee began a decade ago when, in 1993, she served as a delegate for the American Council of Young Political Leaders in Southeast Asia, and continued in 1995, when she was appointed by then- Governor Don Sundquist as the Executive Director of the Tennessee Film, Entertainment
    [Show full text]