Why It's Worse to Be a Sissy Than a Tomboy: the Sexual Orienta On Hypothesis
Why It's Worse to be a Sissy Than a Tomboy: The Sexual Orientaon Hypothesis. Ursula A. Sanborn-Overby1 & Kimberly K. Powlishta2 SUNY Oneonta1, Saint Louis University2, Department of Psychology Background STUDY 2 STUDY 3 • Although both males and females elicit nega8ve reac8ons when they Aim. To test a necessary precondion of the Sexual Orientaon violate gender norms, intolerance is parcularly pronounced when the Aim. To test the Sexual Orientaon Hypothesis: that the more a gender- Hypothesis: that perceived homosexuality is more closely associated with violaons are commied by males (e.g., Levy, Taylor, & Gelman, 1995; role violaon for a given item is thought to implicate homosexuality, the gender atypicality in males than in females, both overall and within more intolerance there will be for that violaon. Mar8n, 1990; WaKerson & Powlishta, 2007). different gendered domains. • One proposed explanaon for the asymmetric reacon to male vs. Procedure. Intolerance scores (from Study 1) were correlated with Parcipants & Procedure. Sixty-five adults (39 females) rated the same perceived homosexuality scores (from Study 2) using the item as the unit female gender-role violators focuses on perceived sexual orientaon: 245 characteriscs in terms of how typical they were for heterosexual that gender atypicality is more closely associated with homosexuality in of analysis, separately for masculine and feminine characteriscs in each versus homosexual males and females (1 = Typical of Heterosexual Males/ males than in females, such that the elevated negavity towards domain. Females only, 7 = Typical of Gay Males/Lesbians only). A “perceived Results (see Table 1). As expected, all correla8ons were posi8ve and gender-atypical males actually reflects sexual prejudice (McCreary, homosexuality” score was created for each item, with higher scores 1997; Sirin, McCreary, & Mahalik, 2004).