DOCSLIB.ORG

LETTING BE VOLUME II We Ourselves the Politics of Us Tristan Garcia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LETTING BE VOLUME II We Ourselves the Politics of Us Tristan Garcia LETTING BE VOLUME II We Ourselves The Politics of Us Tristan Garcia Translated by Christopher RayAlexander, Abigail RayAlexander and Jon Cogburn 66646_Garcia.indd646_Garcia.indd iiiiii 110/11/200/11/20 55:09:09 PPMM Contents Series Editor’s Preface viii We Ourselves Book I: Transparencies The fi rst person plural 5 Everyone-we-I 30 Three objections 36 Every we is a system of divisions 50 Confl icts of division 56 The intersection model 59 The transparency model 64 The contour 66 The overlap 70 Transparency and opacity 74 Re-covering 78 The bottom 81 66646_Garcia.indd646_Garcia.indd v 110/11/200/11/20 55:09:09 PPMM vi WE OURSELVES Book II: Constraints 1. The Ground of We 105 2. Dynamic 162 3. Domination 186 4. The End of We 216 Bibliography 230 Index 248 66646_Garcia.indd646_Garcia.indd vvii 110/11/200/11/20 55:09:09 PPMM The fi rst person plural Let us begin by acknowledging that the subject of politics is we.1 In contrast with the fi rst person singular, something about the fi rst person plural grants it a permanent variation of range, since it can just as readily designate only you and me, or the totality of living things, or even what lies beyond. Let us imagine a circle, what we might call the ‘circle of we’. We can picture how its limits encircle those around us, our family, our clan, our tribe, and our community. Or, on the contrary, we can imagine the diffusion of that circle within the social realm. This diffusion increases when the circle is extended to sensate beings, animals, and even certain vegetables. As the circle expands or shrinks, its diameter corre- sponds to a given state of us. Consequently, there are as many political subjects as there are states of us, which we can understand as possible extensions of this imaginary circle. ‘We’ is an ectoplasmic form found in the majority of human languages. It is capable of embracing everything that lies between myself and the rest of the world. Through ‘we’, many subjects situ- ate themselves, limit themselves, negotiate their similarities and differences, and engage in politics. We can’t keep ourselves from saying ‘we’, no matter our degree of engagement, our line, or our camp. We all say ‘we’, regardless of the group: professional activists, mere sympathisers, sceptical citizens with fl uctuating convictions, socialists, social democrats, LGBTQI activists, takfi ri Wahhabists, Trotskyites from the Com- intern, separatists, Pabloites, Third Worldists, neoconservatives, autonomists, indigenists, anti-colonialists, untouchables from the Bahujan Samaj Party, Republicans, Ba’athists, patriotic nationalists, fascists, apolitical people, Christian Democrats, Mormons, pro- moters of the Third Way, defenders of animal rights, Zionist Jews, pan-Africanists, deep ecologists in the tradition of Ecosophy T, suffragettes, Bolivarians, anarchists, neo-Nazis, homonationalists or femonationalists, Labour supporters, degrowthists, liberal libertar- ians, constitutional monarchists, Black Nationalists, Mensheviks, 66646_Garcia.indd646_Garcia.indd 5 110/11/200/11/20 55:09:09 PPMM 6 WE OURSELVES Soka Gakkai Buddhists, abolitionists, civil rights activists, Sunni jihadists, reformists, pro-life activists, and so on. The essence of political discourse lies in defi ning how we understand this ‘we’, what our rights and legitimate claims are, and our conception of society as a whole. However, political discourse also requires us to negatively identify those who oppose us, the ene- mies whom we designate as ‘you’ or ‘them’. Try for a moment to make no distinction between all of the possible groups and asso- ciations to which you feel you belong and those that appear dis- tant, even exotic. Stop separating the collective identities that you consider to be grounded, universal, and serious from those you consider irrational, ridiculous, or dangerous. Suspend your moral judgement. Then, through thought, try to establish a sort of imagi- nary plane upon which you might consider, at once equally and distinctly, everything that speaks in the name of we. Try this now, and you will see that everyone who says ‘we’ speaks as the same person, which is to say that they take on the being of people who speak that way, even when those people have an identity or principles that irritate or repulse them. We say ‘we’ along with them. So let us examine this vertiginous diversity alongside the cacophony of our attempts to portray ourselves. Let us do this even though it might seem to the more sceptical among us as a sign of fanaticism or a proof of the airy nature of all proclamations of identity. However, let us also suppose that the proliferation of divergent and contra- dictory we’s is not irrational, but rather manifests a noble trait of subjectivity: its propensity to organise itself politically. What happens when we say ‘we’? By the grace of language, which allows us to inhabit that pronoun, we can at different times claim to be on all sides, including that of even our fi ercest adversaries. Nothing enunciated in the name of a we is a com- plete stranger to us. However, ‘we’ also signifi es our we, as distinct from your we. We know that you say ‘we’, but you don’t say it like us. We can tell this because our practices, customs, and ideas are different. We is at once the possibility of being everyone, the vague promise within language of universal belonging, as well as the concrete assignation to a particular identity.2 We is some- thing that we are and that you are not, even if you also say ‘we’ in your own way. 66646_Garcia.indd646_Garcia.indd 6 110/11/200/11/20 55:09:09 PPMM TRANSPARENCIES 7 This we is a fl exible entity.3 It is malleable enough to take in beings of all kinds, but still suffi ciently limiting to allow for distinc- tions between camps, depending on who is using the word and how they are using it. We should not naively think that all who cry ‘we’ understand the word in the same way. But we also shouldn’t think that ‘we’ is a meaningless word that we can defi ne however we want. Nor is it a simple indexical term, a mirror word that just refers back to its conditions of enunciation, to who said it and when and where they did so. The truth is that, even if there is only one word to say it, there is not only one we.4 Nevertheless, there are not as many different we’s as there are uses of the term. In order to avoid falling into either opening of this double trap, it is use- ful to consider the we as a structure that is at once both free and determined. We should not think of we as a pure phenomenon of language. We structures the spirit of those who make use of it, and orients that usage without entirely forcing it. One may speak of we with respect to a very small number of people, or in reference to everyone. Nevertheless, there is something within that we – a sort of resistance within its ectoplasmic form – that follows a certain logic. This logic only becomes apparent through the repeti- tion of its variations. Therefore, in order to comprehend what we is, we must go against all the recommendations of the sociological method and treat the masses and the state without distinction. The more we’s that we recognise, the more we abstract from the particularities of the use of the fi rst person plural. Our com- mon traits stand out more clearly. A general understanding of what we is requires nothing more than a moral quality, a certain empa- thetic disposition that allows us to weaken the closed-mindedness of our own convictions and principles in order to strengthen our ability to mentally participate in any community whatsoever. Lis- tening to everything that the people around us say and naively including ourselves whenever we hear ‘our brother’, ‘our family’, or ‘our comrades’ is enough for us to imagine being one of them, sharing their ideas and identity, and counting ourselves as part of their number. But where to begin? First, let us draw an initial cir- cle of we. Then, let us adjust its perimeter, cut it into subsets, and shift its boundaries to try to discover as many manifestations of identity as possible in recent history. 66646_Garcia.indd646_Garcia.indd 7 110/11/200/11/20 55:09:09 PPMM 8 WE OURSELVES We can begin by tracing an imaginary line around all human beings. This yields a more or less circular fi gure, the interior of which consists of endlessly multiplying sections of the circle. The most notable of these, or at least the one that superfi cially seems most important and most present in political discourses, is the section pertaining to individuals described in Woyzeck as ‘poor people like us’, the landless and the disinherited, the proletariat, the workers, the exploited, the small.5 The name changes, and, as it transforms, the circle is no longer exactly the same. At its big- gest, its default defi nition is the we of the Occupy movement: ‘We are the 99%.’6 It is the nameless we, we the many standing in opposition to the minuscule minority that possesses the planet’s economic wealth. Blurring the lines between all who are neither ‘masters’ nor ‘bosses’, the we of the many is the main character of Marxist history. This we is celebrated by the well-known couplet of ‘The Internationale’: ‘We are the law, we are the many. We who were nothing, let us be all.’7 But this we of the many, which has the right to aspire to eve- rything, this immense we of all who feel dispossessed of economic means, robbed of their inheritance, excluded by the telling of his- tory and the curating of cultural knowledge, and cut off from the law and the state apparatus, such a we is weakly determined.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reading William Morris, Peter Kropotkin, Ursula K. Le Guin, and PM in the Light of Digital Socialism
    tripleC 18(1): 146-186, 2020 http://www.triple-c.at The Utopian Internet, Computing, Communication, and Concrete Utopias: Reading William Morris, Peter Kropotkin, Ursula K. Le Guin, and P.M. in the Light of Digital Socialism Christian Fuchs University of Westminster, London, [email protected], http://fuchs.uti.at Abstract: This paper asks: What can we learn from literary communist utopias for the creation and organisation of communicative and digital socialist society and a utopian Internet? To pro- vide an answer to this question, the article discusses aspects of technology and communica- tion in utopian-communist writings and reads these literary works in the light of questions con- cerning digital technologies and 21st-century communication. The selected authors have writ- ten some of the most influential literary communist utopias. The utopias presented by these authors are the focus of the reading presented in this paper: William Morris’s (1890/1993) News from Nowhere, Peter Kropotkin’s (1892/1995) The Conquest of Bread, Ursula K. Le Guin’s (1974/2002) The Dispossessed, and P.M.’s (1983/2011; 2009; 2012) bolo’bolo and Kartoffeln und Computer (Potatoes and Computers). These works are the focus of the reading presented in this paper and are read in respect to three themes: general communism, technol- ogy and production, communication and culture. The paper recommends features of concrete utopian-communist stories that can inspire contemporary political imagination and socialist consciousness. The themes explored include the role of post-scarcity, decentralised comput- erised planning, wealth and luxury for all, beauty, creativity, education, democracy, the public sphere, everyday life, transportation, dirt, robots, automation, and communist means of com- munication (such as the “ansible”) in digital communism.
    [Show full text]
  • Marx's Confrontation with Utopia Darren Webb Department of Politics
    In Search of the Spirit of Revolution: Marx's Confrontation with Utopia Darren Webb Department of Politics Thesis presented to the University of Sheffield for the degree of PhD, June 1998 Summary This thesis offers a sympathetic interpretation of Marx' s confrontation with Utopia. It begins by suggesting that Marx condemned utopianism as a political process because it undermined the principles of popular self-emancipation and self-determination, principles deemed by Marx to be fundamental to the constitution of any truly working­ class movement. As a means of invoking the spirit of revolution, it was therefore silly, stale and reactionary. With regards to Marx's own 'utopia', the thesis argues that the categories which define it were nothing more than theoretical by-products of the models employed by Marx in order to supersede the need for utopianism. As such, Marx was an 'Accidental Utopian'. Two conclusions follow from this. The first is that Marx's entire project was driven by the anti-utopian imperative to invoke the spirit of revolution in a manner consistent with the principles of popular self-emancipation and self-determination. The second is that, in spite of his varied attempts to do so, Marx was unable to capture the spirit of revolution without descending into utopianism himself Such conclusions do not, however, justify the claim that utopianism has a necessary role to play in radical politics. For Marx's original critique of utopianism was accurate and his failure to develop a convincing alternative takes nothing away from this. The accuracy of Marx's original critique is discussed in relation to the arguments put forward by contemporary pro-utopians as well as those developed by William Morris, Ernst Bloch and Herbert Marcuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Utopia & Terror in the 20Th Century.Pdf
    Utopia and Terror in the 20th Century Part I Professor Vejas Gabriel Liulevicius THE TEACHING COMPANY ® Vejas Gabriel Liulevicius, Ph.D. Associate Professor of History, University of Tennessee Vejas Gabriel Liulevicius was born in Chicago, Illinois. He grew up on Chicago’s Southside in a Lithuanian- American neighborhood and spent some years attending school in Aarhus, Denmark, and Bonn, Germany. He received his B.A. from the University of Chicago. In 1989, he spent the summer in Moscow and Leningrad (today St. Petersburg) in intensive language study in Russian. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Pennsylvania in European history in 1994, specializing in modern German history. After receiving his doctorate, Professor Liulevicius spent a year as a postdoctoral research fellow at the Hoover Institution on War, Peace, and Revolution at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California. Since 1995, he has been a history professor at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville. He teaches courses on modern German history, Western civilization, Nazi Germany, World War I, war and culture, 20th-century Europe, nationalism, and utopian thought. In 2003, he received the University of Tennessee’s Excellence in Teaching award. Professor Liulevicius’s research focuses on German relations with Eastern Europe in the modern period. His other interests include the utopian tradition and its impact on modern politics, images of the United States abroad, and the history of Lithuania and the Baltic region. He has published numerous articles and his first book, War Land on the Eastern Front: Culture, National Identity and German Occupation in the First World War (2000), published by Cambridge University Press, also appeared in German translation in 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Sos Political Science & Public Administration M.A.Political Science
    Sos Political science & Public administration M.A.Political Science II Sem Political Philosophy:Mordan Political Thought, Theory & contemporary Ideologies(201) UNIT-IV Topic Name-Utopian Socialism What is utopian society? • A utopia is an imagined community or society that possesses highly desirable or nearly perfect qualities for its citizens.The opposite of a utopia is a dystopia. • Utopia focuses on equality in economics, government and justice, though by no means exclusively, with the method and structure of proposed implementation varying based on ideology.According to Lyman Tower SargentSargent argues that utopia's nature is inherently contradictory, because societies are not homogenous and have desires which conflict and therefore cannot simultaneously be satisfied. • The term utopia was created from Greek by Sir Thomas More for his 1516 book Utopia, describing a fictional island society in the south Atlantic Ocean off the coast of South America Who started utopian socialism? • Charles Fourier was a French socialist who lived from 1772 until 1837 and is credited with being an early Utopian Socialist similar to Robert Owen. He wrote several works related to his socialist ideas which centered on his main idea for society: small communities based on cooperation Definition of utopian socialism • socialism based on a belief that social ownership of the means of production can be achieved by voluntary and peaceful surrender of their holdings by propertied groups What is the goal of utopian societies? • The aim of a utopian society is to promote the highest quality of living possible. The word 'utopia' was coined by the English philosopher, Sir Thomas More, in his 1516 book, Utopia, which is about a fictional island community.
    [Show full text]
  • Socialism and the Blockchain
    future internet Article Socialism and the Blockchain Steve Huckle * and Martin White Creative Technology Group, Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, Chichester 1, 128, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QT, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-0-1273-606755 Academic Editor: Carmen de Pablos Heredero Received: 5 August 2016; Accepted: 10 October 2016; Published: 18 October 2016 Abstract: Bitcoin (BTC) is often cited as Libertarian. However, the technology underpinning Bitcoin, blockchain, has properties that make it ideally suited to Socialist paradigms. Current literature supports the Libertarian viewpoint by focusing on the ability of Bitcoin to bypass central authority and provide anonymity; rarely is there an examination of blockchain technology’s capacity for decentralised transparency and auditability in support of a Socialist model. This paper conducts a review of the blockchain, Libertarianism, and Socialist philosophies. It then explores Socialist models of public ownership and looks at the unique cooperative properties of blockchain that make the technology ideal for supporting Socialist societies. In summary, this paper argues that blockchain technologies are not just a Libertarian tool, they also enhance Socialist forms of governance. Keywords: Bitcoin; blockchain; cryptocurrency; fiat money; libertarianism; socialism; Marxism; anarchism 1. Introduction Bitcoin (BTC) is referred to as cryptocurrency because it is a form of electronic cash that relies on cryptography. Since its inception in early 2009 [1], it has achieved a degree of prominence, not least in terms of market value; at the time of writing, its total market capitalisation was over US $6 billion [2]. Furthermore, governmental institutions are beginning to examine the blockchain technology underpinning BTC [3] because some of its properties, which we discuss below, may have implications that extend beyond economics and into social, political and humanitarian domains [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Mnfittt of Cbutation
    GANDHI'S SOCIALISM AND ITS IMPACT ON EDUCATION DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Mnfittt of Cbutation BY Naseemul Haque Ansari Exam. Roll No. 3117 82 M. Ed.-9 Enrolment NO.-P-9708 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF Dr. (Miss) Shakuntala Saxena Reader DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH 1982-83 :P^^AZA *iO v >.,, .. •i>S5 9g. •^ JNtVKS''^ 25 MAYI985 r'^t^r'^'4"» 9^ fw DS598 CHEC;;„D-2033 CERTIFICATE Certified that Mr. Naseemul Haque Ansari has completed his dissertation entitled "Gandhi's Socialism and Its Impact on Education," under my supervision and, submitted for partial fulfilment of the degree of Master of Education in session 1982-83, ( Dr. (Miss) Sh^cuntala Saxena ) Supervisor ACKKOWLEDGEhENTS Acknowledging the help made available to me can never repay their labour and love extended to me. Keeping with the tradition I, therefore, extend my profound gratitude to Dr.(Miss) Shakuntala Saxena, Reader, Department of Education, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh without v/hose unremitting able guidance, sympathetic attitude and deep interest in the study, it would not have been possible for me to complete this dissertation. My sincere thanks are for Mr. Syed.Md. Noman for his ever available great contribution and making him available all the time for his selfless help. I am also greatful to Mr. Md. Parvez, Mr. Salman Israiely, Mr. Haseenuddin and Mr. Ejaz Ahmed Khan who provided their full support and cooperation in making the reference books available and thus enabling me to proceed with my work v/ithout any impediment. Besides help also came indirectly from several friends and office bearers to whoi^e I will always be thankful.
    [Show full text]
  • Rising with the Robots: Towards a Human-Machine Autonomy for Digital Socialism
    tripleC 18(1): 67-83, 2020 http://www.triple-c.at Rising With the Robots: Towards a Human-Machine Autonomy for Digital Socialism Christopher M. Cox The University of Akron, Akron, OH, USA, [email protected] Abstract: This essay is concerned with conceptualising digital socialism in two ways. First, this essay typifies digital socialism as a real utopian project bringing together the utopian po- tential of “full automation” as tied to socio-economic imperatives indicative of socialist aims. Second, in recognition of a critical gap between full automation and an emerging technological autonomy, this essay argues for a human-machine autonomy that situates autonomy as a shared condition among humans and machines. By conceiving of humans and automated technologies as autonomous subject aligned against capital, pursuing the aims of digital so- cialism can anticipate and avoid capitalist ideologies that hinders possibilities for autonomous pursuit of digital socialism. Keywords: digital socialism, robots, robotics, fully-automated communism, full automation, human-machine autonomy, Autonomist Marxism, Autonomism 1. Introduction This essay attempts to answer the question “how do recent debates about ‘full auto- mation’ and postcapitalist socioeconomics establish a foundation for conceptualizing digital socialism?” Since 2015, debates about socialism have exhibited a resurgence among public consciousness and electoral politics in the western world. From the election of “Marx- admiring socialist” (Danner 2015) Jeremy Corbyn as leader of the UK Labour Party to successive Bernie Sanders U.S. presidential campaigns foregrounding “democratic socialism” as a series of comprehensive socio-economic reforms aimed at creating an economy that “works for all, not just the very wealthy” (Frizell 2015) to the surge of 13,000 new members and 100 new chapters of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) (Schwartz 2017), “socialism” is increasingly mobilized by political actors.
    [Show full text]
  • Vichy Against Vichy: History and Memory of the Second World War in the Former Capital of the État Français from 1940 to the Present
    Vichy against Vichy: History and Memory of the Second World War in the Former Capital of the État français from 1940 to the Present Audrey Mallet A Thesis In the Department of History Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne December 2016 © Audrey Mallet, 2016 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES This is to certify that the thesis prepared By: Audrey Mallet Entitled: Vichy against Vichy: History and Memory of the Second World War in the Former Capital of the État français from 1940 to the Present and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final examining committee: Chair Dr. G. LeBlanc External Examiner Dr. E. Jennings External to Program Dr. F. Chalk Examiner Dr. D. Peschanski Examiner Dr. C. Claveau Thesis Co-Supervisor Dr. N. Ingram Thesis Co-Supervisor Dr. H. Rousso Approved by: Dr. B. Lorenzkowski, Graduate Program Director December 5, 2016 Dr. A. Roy, Dean, Faculty of Arts & Science Abstract Vichy against Vichy: History and Memory of the Second World War in the Former Capital of the État français from 1940 to the Present Audrey Mallet, Ph.D. Concordia University & Paris I Panthéon Sorbonne, 2016 Following the June 22, 1940 armistice and the subsequent occupation of northern France by the Germans, the French government left Paris and eventually established itself in the city of Vichy.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download the Paper As A
    So& Wloirkdersa’ Lirbeirtty y No 214 24 August 2011 30p/80p For a workers’ government Ban the EDL? 1911: Liverpool The religion of the page 3 on strike page 8-9 Socialist Party pages 11-12 Post-riot clampdown on working-class youth OPPOSE THIS CLASS-HATE BLITZ See page 5 More socialist ideas and labour movement news online: www.workersliberty.org NEWS What is the Alliance for Workers’ Liberty? Libya: the return of hope Today one class, the working class, lives by selling From back page workers’ rights. gogue on the British left and its annihilation, it is its labour power to another, the capitalist class, But in fact the funda - will ever have to face. irresponsible and morally which owns the means of production. Society Outright support for Qaddafi is confined to a mental lesson of Libya — Workers’ Liberty be - degenerate to simply de - is shaped by the capitalists’ relentless drive to marginal fringe of sects,. as with all the heroic and lieves that a people staring mand that it ceases, or to increase their wealth. Capitalism causes inspiring uprisings we down the wrong end of a oppose it ever taking poverty, unemployment, the blighting of lives by For most of the far-left, have see in the Middle state-sanctioned massacre place. We believe that the overwork, imperialism, the destruction of the the intervention of NATO East and North Africa this have the right to call for gains of the uprising vin - environment and much else. in Libya cancelled out the year — is that no ruling assistance, even from im - dicate that view.
    [Show full text]
  • The Religious Issue in Lucien Rebatet's Les Deux Étendards
    Studies in 20th Century Literature Volume 25 Issue 2 Article 5 6-1-2001 Modern Literature and Christianity: The Religious Issue in Lucien Rebatet's Les Deux étendards Pascal A. Ifri Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://newprairiepress.org/sttcl Part of the French and Francophone Literature Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Ifri, Pascal A. (2001) "Modern Literature and Christianity: The Religious Issue in Lucien Rebatet's Les Deux étendards ," Studies in 20th Century Literature: Vol. 25: Iss. 2, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.4148/ 2334-4415.1509 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by New Prairie Press. It has been accepted for inclusion in Studies in 20th Century Literature by an authorized administrator of New Prairie Press. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Modern Literature and Christianity: The Religious Issue in Lucien Rebatet's Les Deux étendards Abstract Although Lucien Rebatet's Les Deux étendards (The Two Standards) has been hailed by a number of critics as one of the best novels written in France since World War II, it is surrounded by a wall of silence because its author actively supported the Nazi movement before and during the war. Yet the novel does not deal with politics but with love, art, and religion. Based on real events, it is the story of a love triangle involving Michel, who has lost his Catholic faith, Régis, who studies to become a Jesuit priest, and Anne- Marie, a young student who shares a mystical love with Régis and also intends to join a religious order.
    [Show full text]
  • Theories About Sex and Sexuality in Utopian Socialism
    Journal of Homosexuality ISSN: 0091-8369 (Print) 1540-3602 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/wjhm20 Theories About Sex and Sexuality in Utopian Socialism Saskia Poldervaart To cite this article: Saskia Poldervaart (1995) Theories About Sex and Sexuality in Utopian Socialism, Journal of Homosexuality, 29:2-3, 41-68, DOI: 10.1300/J082v29n02_02 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J082v29n02_02 Published online: 18 Oct 2010. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 144 View related articles Citing articles: 1 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=wjhm20 Download by: [Vanderbilt University Library] Date: 25 October 2017, At: 04:27 Theories About Sex and Sexuality in Utopian Socialism Saskia Poldervaart Universiteit van Amsterdam SUMMARY. It was the utopian socialists of the period 1800-50 (Fourier, Saint-Simon, and the Saint-Simonians in France, as well as the Owenites in Great Britain) who not only challenged the imperial- ism of reason but sought to rehabilitate the flesh by valuing its plea- sure and incentives. Sex and sexuality were central issues for the first socialists, who were scorned as ‘‘utopian’’ by Marx and Engels for seeking to improve the status of all members of society through peaceful means. Because Marxism has played a greater role in the history of socialism, the utopian socialist discussions have been largely disregarded. This essay analyzes the works of the utopian so- cialists Fourier, Saint-Simon, and the Saint-Simonians, arguing that resurgences of the utopian socialist tradition can be discerned around 1900 and again circa 1970.
    [Show full text]
  • Libertarian Socialism
    Libertarian Socialism PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 19:52:27 UTC Contents Articles Libertarian socialism 1 The Venus Project 37 The Zeitgeist Movement 39 References Article Sources and Contributors 42 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 43 Article Licenses License 44 Libertarian socialism 1 Libertarian socialism Libertarian socialism (sometimes called social anarchism,[1][2] and sometimes left libertarianism)[3][4] is a group of political philosophies that promote a non-hierarchical, non-bureaucratic society without private property in the means of production. Libertarian socialists believe in converting present-day private productive property into the commons or public goods, while retaining respect for personal property[5]. Libertarian socialism is opposed to coercive forms of social organization. It promotes free association in place of government and opposes the social relations of capitalism, such as wage labor.[6] The term libertarian socialism is used by some socialists to differentiate their philosophy from state socialism[7][8] or by some as a synonym for left anarchism.[1][2][9] Adherents of libertarian socialism assert that a society based on freedom and equality can be achieved through abolishing authoritarian institutions that control certain means of production and subordinate the majority to an owning class or political and economic elite.[10] Libertarian socialism also constitutes a tendency of thought that
    [Show full text]