Sparks and Taylor's Nursing Diagnosis Pocket Guide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sparks and Taylor's Nursing Diagnosis Pocket Guide LWBK392-FM_i-xxiv.qxd 11/17/09 8:20 PM Page i Aptara Inc SPARKS AND TAYLOR’S Nursing Diagnosis Pocket Guide Sheila Sparks Ralph, RN, PhD, FAAN Professor, Division of Nursing Shenandoah University Winchester, VA Member of NANDA-I Foundation Philadelphia Cynthia M. Taylor, RN, MS Nurse Consultant Coordinator, Parish Nurse Program St. Michael’s Church Kailua Kona, HI LWBK392-FM_i-xxiv.qxd 11/17/09 8:20 PM Page ii Aptara Inc Acquisitions Editor: Jean Rodenberger Development Editor: Helene T. Caprari Marketing Manager: Laura Meiskey Director of Nursing Production: Helen Ewan Art Director, Design: Joan Wendt Manufacturing Coordinator: Karin Duffield Production Services: Aptara, Inc. Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins All rights reserved. This book is protected by copyright. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including as photocopies or scanned-in or other electronic copies, or utilized by any information storage and retrieval system without written permission from the copyright owner, except for brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Materials appearing in this book prepared by individuals as part of their official duties as U.S. government employees are not covered by the above-mentioned copyright. To request permission, please con- tact Lippincott Williams & Wilkins at 530 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106, via e-mail at [email protected], or via Web site at lww.com (products and services). 987654321 Printed in China Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Ralph, Sheila Sparks. Sparks and Taylor’s nursing diagnosis pocket guide / Sheila Sparks Ralph, Cynthia M. Taylor. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-1-58255-733-5 1. Nursing diagnosis—Handbooks, manuals, etc. I. Taylor, Cynthia M. II. Title. III. Title: Nursing diagnosis pocket guide. [DNLM: 1. Nursing Diagnosis—methods—Handbooks. WY 49 R163sa 2011] RT48.6.R35 2011 616.07'5—dc22 2009028540 Care has been taken to confirm the accuracy of the information presented and to describe generally accepted practices. However, the authors, editors, and publisher are not responsible for errors or omissions or for any consequences from application of the information in this book and make no warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the currency, completeness, or accuracy of the contents of the publication. Application of this information in a particular situation remains the professional responsibility of the practitioner; the clinical treatments described and recommended may not be considered absolute and universal recommendations. The authors, editors, and publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accordance with the current rec- ommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any change in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new or infrequently employed drug. Some drugs and medical devices presented in this publication have Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance for limited use in restricted research settings. It is the responsibility of the healthcare provider to ascertain the FDA status of each drug or device planned for use in his or her clinical practice. LWW.COM LWBK392-FM_i-xxiv.qxd 11/17/09 8:20 PM Page iii Aptara Inc CONTRIBUTORS Marcia Perkins, MSN, RN Adjunct Clinical Instructor, Division of Nursing Shenandoah University Winchester, VA Helen H. Mautner, MSN, RN Assistant Professor, Division of Nursing Shenandoah University Winchester, VA Anne Z. Cockerham, PhD, CNM Course Coordinator Frontier School of Midwifery and Family Nursing Hyden, KY Jennifer Matthews, PhD, RN Associate Professor, Division of Nursing Shenandoah University Winchester, VA Billinda Tebbenhoff, MSN, RN Adjunct Clinical Instructor, Division of Nursing Shenandoah University Winchester, VA Sherry Rawls-Bryce, MSN, RN Adjunct Assistant Professor, Division of Nursing Shenandoah University Winchester, VA Maryann Valcourt, MSN, CPNP Assistant Professor Trinity University Washington, DC iii LWBK392-FM_i-xxiv.qxd 11/17/09 8:20 PM Page iv Aptara Inc LWBK392-FM_i-xxiv.qxd 11/17/09 8:20 PM Page v Aptara Inc PREFACE For student nurses as well as expert clinicians, Sparks and Taylor’s Nursing Diagnosis Pocket Guide offers a clearly written, authoritative care plan for each of the NANDA International (NANDA-I) approved nursing diagnoses to help meet patients’ healthcare needs. The guide is organized using a unique assessment framework based on the NNN Taxonomy of Nursing Practice: A Common Unifying Structure for Nursing Language (Dochterman & Jones, 2003) and the intervention terms from the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP® Version 1; International Council of Nurses, 2005). This framework provides a comprehensive yet easy-to-use format for writ- ing plans of care for clients. The book also includes the linkages between NANDA-I and the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) and Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) labels. You’ll find the care plans in this book, which are designed for easy use with a left- and right-page sequence, are invaluable in every healthcare setting you encounter throughout your career. GUIDELINES FOR USING SPARKS AND TAYLOR’S NURSING DIAGNOSIS POCKET GUIDE All care plans contain the following sections: I Diagnostic statement. Each diagnostic statement includes a NANDA-I-approved diagnosis. The Sparks and Taylor’s Nursing Diagnosis Pocket Guide contains all the diagnoses approved by NANDA-I through 2009. I Definition. Each diagnosis is explained with a NANDA-I approved definition. I Defining characteristics. This section lists clinical findings that confirm the diagnosis. For diagnoses expressing the possibility of a problem, such as “Risk for Injury,” this section is labeled Risk Factors. I Assessment. This section suggests parameters to use when collect- ing data to ensure an accurate diagnosis. Complete assessment parameters are presented in Appendix A. The parameters are based on the NNN Taxonomy of Nursing Practice and include four domains: functional, physiological, psychosocial, and environmental (see Appendix A). The domains are subdivided v LWBK392-FM_i-xxiv.qxd 11/17/09 8:20 PM Page vi Aptara Inc vi Preface into classes; each class includes key subjective and objective data to be assessed. For each plan, the authors have indicated the parameters that are most necessary for that diagnosis. I Expected outcomes. Here you’ll find realistic goals for resolving or ameliorating the patient’s health problem, written in measura- ble behavioral terms. You should select outcomes that are appro- priate to the condition of your patient. Outcomes are arranged to flow logically from admission to discharge of the patient. Outcomes identified by NOC research are included for your con- sideration. I Interventions and rationales. This section provides specific activities you carry out to help attain expected outcomes. Inter- ventions are organized using the following terms: determine, perform, inform, attend, and manage. These intervention types use the International Classification of Nursing Practice taxonomy that is explained in more detail later in these guide- lines. Each intervention contains a rationale, highlighted in italic. Rationales receive typographic emphasis because they form the premise for every nursing action. You’ll find it helpful to consider rationales before intervening. Understanding the why of your actions can help you see that carrying out repetitive or difficult interventions is an essential element of your nursing practice. More importantly, it can improve critical thinking and help you avoid mistakes. Interventions from NIC research are included for your consideration. I Reference. Each plan concludes with a reference that you may find useful if you need further information about the nursing diagnosis. NURSING PROCESS OVERVIEW The cornerstone of clinical nursing, the nursing process, is a system- atic method for taking independent nursing action. Steps in the nursing process include the following: I assessing the patient’s problems I forming a diagnostic statement I identifying expected outcomes I creating a plan to achieve expected outcomes I implementing the plan or assigning steps for implementation to others I evaluating the plan’s effectiveness These phases of the nursing process—assessment, nursing diagnosis formation, outcome identification, care planning, implementation, and evaluation—are dynamic and flexible; they commonly overlap. LWBK392-FM_i-xxiv.qxd 11/17/09 8:20 PM Page vii Aptara Inc Preface vii Becoming familiar with this process has many benefits. It will allow you to apply your knowledge and skills in an organized, goal- oriented manner. It will also enable you to communicate about pro- fessional topics with colleagues from all clinical specialties and prac- tice settings. Using the nursing process is essential to documenting nursing’s role in the provision of comprehensive, quality patient care. By clearly defining those problems a nurse may treat independently, the nursing process has helped dispel the notion that nursing practice is based solely on carrying out physician’s orders. Nurse researchers and expert practitioners
Recommended publications
  • The Stethoscope: Some Preliminary Investigations
    695 ORIGINAL ARTICLE The stethoscope: some preliminary investigations P D Welsby, G Parry, D Smith Postgrad Med J: first published as on 5 January 2004. Downloaded from ............................................................................................................................... See end of article for Postgrad Med J 2003;79:695–698 authors’ affiliations ....................... Correspondence to: Dr Philip D Welsby, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK; [email protected] Submitted 21 April 2003 Textbooks, clinicians, and medical teachers differ as to whether the stethoscope bell or diaphragm should Accepted 30 June 2003 be used for auscultating respiratory sounds at the chest wall. Logic and our results suggest that stethoscope ....................... diaphragms are more appropriate. HISTORICAL ASPECTS note is increased as the amplitude of the sound rises, Hippocrates advised ‘‘immediate auscultation’’ (the applica- resulting in masking of higher frequency components by tion of the ear to the patient’s chest) to hear ‘‘transmitted lower frequencies—‘‘turning up the volume accentuates the sounds from within’’. However, in 1816 a French doctor, base’’ as anyone with teenage children will have noted. Rene´The´ophile Hyacinth Laennec invented the stethoscope,1 Breath sounds are generated by turbulent air flow in the which thereafter became the identity symbol of the physician. trachea and proximal bronchi. Airflow in the small airways Laennec apparently had observed two children sending and alveoli is of lower velocity and laminar in type and is 6 signals to each other by scraping one end of a long piece of therefore silent. What is heard at the chest wall depends on solid wood with a pin, and listening with an ear pressed to the conductive and filtering effect of lung tissue and the the other end.2 Later, in 1816, Laennec was called to a young characteristics of the chest wall.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment Module
    Assessment Module 1 | Page Assessment May 2017 Table of Contents About this Module/Overview/Objectives……………………………………………...Page 3 Pre-test…………………………………………………………………………………Pages 4-5 Chapter 1……………………………………………………………………………....Pages 6-12 Overview Focused Assessment vs. Comprehensive Assessment Considerations in preparing for a physical exam Geriatric Assessment Nursing Components Considerations in Elderly Residents Chapter 2……………………………………………………………………………...Pages 12-14 Root Cause of Behaviors Physiologic Social Environmental Psychosocial Chapter 3……………………………………………………………………………...Pages 14-16 Risk Assessment Eyes Ears Hemiparesis Paraplegia Where to place the resident in the room Chapter 4……………………………………………………………...………………Pages 16-18 Texas Board of Nursing and Assessments Federal Nursing Facility Regulations F272: Comprehensive Assessments State Nursing Facility Regulations Chapter 5………………………………………………………………………….......Pages 18-19 Resources “This is me” “This is me: My Care Passport” Alternate Communication Boards Pain, Pain Go Away Presentation Appendices……………………………………………………………………………Pages 20-48 2 | Page Assessment May 2017 About this Module: Assessment is a key component of nursing practice, required for planning and the provision of resident and family centered care. Information that is obtained from an accurate assessment serves as the foundation for age-appropriate nursing care, enhancing the residents’ quality of life and independence. The LVN must have a specific set of skills in order to adequately and effectively assess the resident, including: a physical assessment; a functional assessment; and any additional information about the resident that would be used to develop the care plan. This module will provide you with all of the information necessary to ensure adequate assessments are completed for each resident in the facility, meeting the state and federal requirements for resident assessment. Overview: Conditions such as functional impairment and dementia are common in nursing home residents.
    [Show full text]
  • A Neurological Examination
    THE 3 MINUTE NEUROLOGICAL EXAMINATION DEMYSTIFIED Faculty: W.J. Oczkowski MD, FRCPC Professor and Academic Head, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University Stroke Neurologist, Hamilton Health Sciences Relationships with commercial interests: ► Not Applicable Potential for conflict(s) of interest: ► Not Applicable Mitigating Potential Bias ► All the recommendations involving clinical medicine are based on evidence that is accepted within the profession. ► All scientific research referred to, reported, or used is in the support or justification of patient care. ► Recommendations conform to the generally accepted standards. ► Independent content validation. ► The presentation will mitigate potential bias by ensuring that data and recommendations are presented in a fair and balanced way. ► Potential bias will be mitigated by presenting a full range of products that can be used in this therapeutic area. ► Information of the history, development, funding, and the sponsoring organizations of the disclosure presented will be discussed. Objectives ► Overview of neurological assessment . It’s all about stroke! . It’s all about the chief complaint and history. ► Overview: . 3 types of clinical exams . Neurological signs . Neurological localization o Pathognomonic signs o Upper versus lower motor neuron signs ► Cases and practice Bill ► 72 year old male . Hypertension . Smoker ► Stroke call: dizzy, facial droop, slurred speech ► Neurological Exam: . Ptosis and miosis on left . Numb left face . Left palatal weakness . Dysarthria . Ataxic left arm and left leg . Numb right arm and leg NIH Stroke Scale Score ► LOC: a,b,c_________________ 0 ► Best gaze__________________ 0 0 ► Visual fields________________ 0 ► Facial palsy________________ 0 ► Motor arm and leg__________ -Left Ptosis 2 -Left miosis ► Limb ataxia________________ -Weakness of 1 ► Sensory_______________________ left palate ► Best Language______________ 0 1 ► Dysarthria_________________ 0 ► Extinction and inattention____ - .
    [Show full text]
  • Nursing Students' Perspectives on Telenursing in Patient Care After
    Clinical Simulation in Nursing (2015) 11, 244-250 www.elsevier.com/locate/ecsn Featured Article Nursing Students’ Perspectives on Telenursing in Patient Care After Simulation Inger Ase Reierson, RN, MNSca,*, Hilde Solli, RN, MNSc, CCNa, Ida Torunn Bjørk, RN, MNSc, Dr.polit.a,b aFaculty of Health and Social Studies, Institute of Health Studies, Telemark University College, 3901 Porsgrunn, Norway bFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Society, Department of Nursing Science, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway KEYWORDS Abstract telenursing; Background: This article presents the perspectives of undergraduate nursing students on telenursing simulation; in patient care after simulating three telenursing scenarios using real-time video and audio nursing education; technology. information and Methods: An exploratory design using focus group interviews was performed; data were analyzed us- communication ing qualitative content analysis. technology; Results: Five main categories arose: learning a different nursing role, influence on nursing assessment qualitative content and decision making, reflections on the quality of remote comforting and care, empowering the pa- analysis tient, and ethical and economic reflections. Conclusions: Delivering telenursing care was regarded as important yet complex activity. Telenursing simulation should be integrated into undergraduate nursing education. Cite this article: Reierson, I. A., Solli, H., & Bjørk, I. T. (2015, April). Nursing students’ perspectives on telenursing in patient care after simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 11(4), 244-250. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ecns.2015.02.003. Ó 2015 International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/).
    [Show full text]
  • Improving the Accuracy of Medical Diagnosis with Causal Machine Learning ✉ Jonathan G
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17419-7 OPEN Improving the accuracy of medical diagnosis with causal machine learning ✉ Jonathan G. Richens 1 , Ciarán M. Lee1,2 & Saurabh Johri 1 Machine learning promises to revolutionize clinical decision making and diagnosis. In medical diagnosis a doctor aims to explain a patient’s symptoms by determining the diseases causing them. However, existing machine learning approaches to diagnosis are purely associative, 1234567890():,; identifying diseases that are strongly correlated with a patients symptoms. We show that this inability to disentangle correlation from causation can result in sub-optimal or dangerous diagnoses. To overcome this, we reformulate diagnosis as a counterfactual inference task and derive counterfactual diagnostic algorithms. We compare our counterfactual algorithms to the standard associative algorithm and 44 doctors using a test set of clinical vignettes. While the associative algorithm achieves an accuracy placing in the top 48% of doctors in our cohort, our counterfactual algorithm places in the top 25% of doctors, achieving expert clinical accuracy. Our results show that causal reasoning is a vital missing ingredient for applying machine learning to medical diagnosis. 1 Babylon Health, 60 Sloane Ave, Chelsea, London SW3 3DD, UK. 2 University College London, Gower St, Bloomsbury, London WC1E 6BT, UK. ✉ email: [email protected] NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2020)11:3923 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17419-7 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17419-7 roviding accurate and accessible diagnoses is a fundamental Since its formal definition31, model-based diagnosis has been challenge for global healthcare systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Cardiovascular Assessment
    Cardiovascular Assessment A Home study Course Offered by Nurses Research Publications P.O. Box 480 Hayward CA 94543-0480 Office: 510-888-9070 Fax: 510-537-3434 No unauthorized duplication photocopying of this course is permitted Editor: Nurses Research 1 HOW TO USE THIS COURSE Thank you for choosing Nurses Research Publication home study for your continuing education. This course may be completed as rapidly as you desire. However there is a one-year maximum time limit. If you have downloaded this course from our website you will need to log back on to pay and complete your test. After you submit your test for grading you will be asked to complete a course evaluation and then your certificate of completion will appear on your screen for you to print and keep for your records. Satisfactory completion of the examination requires a passing score of at least 70%. No part of this course may be copied or circulated under copyright law. Instructions: 1. Read the course objectives. 2. Read and study the course. 3. Log back onto our website to pay and take the test. If you have already paid for the course you will be asked to login using the username and password you selected when you registered for the course. 4. When you are satisfied that the answers are correct click grade test. 5. Complete the evaluation. 6. Print your certificate of completion. If you have a procedural question or “nursing” question regarding the materials, call (510) 888-9070 for assistance. Only instructors or our director may answer a nursing question about the test.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Nursing Diagnosis in CA Nursing Schools
    USE OF NURSING DIAGNOSIS IN CALIFORNIA NURSING SCHOOLS AND HOSPITALS January 2018 Funded by generous support from the California Hospital Association (CHA) Copyright 2018 by HealthImpact. All rights reserved. HealthImpact 663 – 13th Street, Suite 300 Oakland, CA 94612 www.healthimpact.org USE OF NURSING DIAGNOSIS IN CALIFORNIA NURSING SCHOOLS AND HOSPITALS INTRODUCTION As part of the effort to define the value of nursing, a common language continues to arise as a central issue in understanding, communicating, and carrying out nursing's unique role in identifying and treating patient response to illness. The diagnostic process and evidence-based interventions developed and subsequently implemented by a practice discipline describe its unique contribution, scope of accountability, and value. The specific responsibility registered nurses (RN) have in assessing patient response to health and illness and determining evidence-based etiology is within the realm of nursing’s autonomous scope of practice, and is referred to as nursing diagnosis. It is an essential element of the nursing process and is followed by implementing specific interventions within nursing’s scope of practice, providing evidence that links professional practice to health outcomes. Conducting a comprehensive nursing assessment leading to the accurate identification of nursing diagnoses guides the development of the plan of care and specific interventions to be carried out. Assessing the patient’s response to health and illness encompasses a wide range of potential problems and actual concerns to be addressed, many of which may not arise from the medical diagnosis and provider orders alone, yet can impede recovery and impact health outcomes. Further, it is critically important to communicate those problems, potential vulnerabilities and related plans of care through broadly understood language unique to nursing.
    [Show full text]
  • Nursing Documentation in Clinical Practice
    From the Department of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Nursing Documentation in Clinical Practice Instrument development and evaluation of a comprehensive intervention programme Catrin Björvell Stockholm 2002 Nursing Documentation in Clinical Practice Instrument development and effects of a comprehensive education programme By: Catrin Björvell Cover layout: Tommy Säflund Printed at: ReproPrint AB, Stockholm ISBN 91-7349-297-3 NURSING DOCUMENTATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE There is nothing more difficult to carry out, nor more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to handle than to initiate a new order of thing. Machiavelli, The Prince Nursing documentation in clinical practice Instrument development and evaluation of a comprehensive intervention programme Catrin Björvell, Department of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Abstract The purpose of this study was to describe and analyse effects of a two-year comprehensive intervention concerning nursing documentation in patient records when using the VIPS model - a model designed to structure nursing documentation. Registered Nurses (RNs) from three acute care hospital wards participated in a two-year intervention programme, in addition, a fourth ward was used for comparison. The intervention consisted of education about nursing documentation in accordance with the VIPS model and organisational changes. To evaluate effects of the intervention patient records (n=269) were audited on three occasions: before the intervention, immediately after the intervention and three years after the intervention. For this purpose, a patient record audit instrument, the Cat-ch-Ing, was constructed and tested. The instrument aims at measuring both quantitatively and qualitatively to what extent the content of the nursing process is documented in the patient record.
    [Show full text]
  • GUIDELINES for WRITING SOAP NOTES and HISTORY and PHYSICALS
    GUIDELINES FOR WRITING SOAP NOTES and HISTORY AND PHYSICALS by Lois E. Brenneman, M.S.N, C.S., A.N.P, F.N.P. © 2001 NPCEU Inc. all rights reserved NPCEU INC. PO Box 246 Glen Gardner, NJ 08826 908-537-9767 - FAX 908-537-6409 www.npceu.com Copyright © 2001 NPCEU Inc. All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatever, including information storage, or retrieval, in whole or in part (except for brief quotations in critical articles or reviews), without written permission of the publisher: NPCEU, Inc. PO Box 246, Glen Gardner, NJ 08826 908-527-9767, Fax 908-527-6409. Bulk Purchase Discounts. For discounts on orders of 20 copies or more, please fax the number above or write the address above. Please state if you are a non-profit organization and the number of copies you are interested in purchasing. 2 GUIDELINES FOR WRITING SOAP NOTES and HISTORY AND PHYSICALS Lois E. Brenneman, M.S.N., C.S., A.N.P., F.N.P. Written documentation for clinical management of patients within health care settings usually include one or more of the following components. - Problem Statement (Chief Complaint) - Subjective (History) - Objective (Physical Exam/Diagnostics) - Assessment (Diagnoses) - Plan (Orders) - Rationale (Clinical Decision Making) Expertise and quality in clinical write-ups is somewhat of an art-form which develops over time as the student/practitioner gains practice and professional experience. In general, students are encouraged to review patient charts, reading as many H/Ps, progress notes and consult reports, as possible. In so doing, one gains insight into a variety of writing styles and methods of conveying clinical information.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosing Diagnosis Errors: Lessons from a Multi-Institutional Collaborative Project
    Diagnosing Diagnosis Errors: Lessons from a Multi-institutional Collaborative Project Gordon D. Schiff, Seijeoung Kim, Richard Abrams, Karen Cosby, Bruce Lambert, Arthur S. Elstein, Scott Hasler, Nela Krosnjar, Richard Odwazny, Mary F. Wisniewski, Robert A. McNutt Abstract Background: Diagnosis errors are frequent and important, but represent an underemphasized and understudied area of patient safety. Diagnosis errors are challenging to detect and dissect. It is often difficult to agree whether an error has occurred, and even harder to determine with certainty its causes and consequence. The authors applied four safety paradigms: (1) diagnosis as part of a system, (2) less reliance on human memory, (3) need to open “breathing space” to reflect and discuss, (4) multidisciplinary perspectives and collaboration. Methods: The authors reviewed literature on diagnosis errors and developed a taxonomy delineating stages in the diagnostic process: (1) access and presentation, (2) history taking/collection, (3) the physical exam, (4) testing, (5) assessment, (6) referral, and (7) followup. The taxonomy identifies where in the diagnostic process the failures occur. The authors used this approach to analyze diagnosis errors collected over a 3-year period of weekly case conferences and by a survey of physicians. Results: The authors summarize challenges encountered from their review of diagnosis error cases, presenting lessons learned using four prototypical cases. A recurring issue is the sorting-out of relationships among errors in the diagnostic process, delay and misdiagnosis, and adverse patient outcomes. To help understand these relationships, the authors present a model that identifies four key challenges in assessing potential diagnosis error cases: (1) uncertainties about diagnosis and findings, (2) the relationship between diagnosis failure and adverse outcomes, (3) challenges in reconstructing clinician assessment of the patient and clinician actions, and (4) global assessment of improvement opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Nurse Practice Act
    Georgia Board of Nursing O.C.G.A. § 43-26 Nurse Practice Act Revised July 2019 Table of Contents Article One Registered Nurses Page Title Code Section Number Short Title O.C.G.A. § 43-26-1 Page 5 Legislative Intent O.C.G.A. § 43-26-2 Page 5 Definitions O.C.G.A. § 43-26-3 Page 5 Georgia Board of Nursing; Membership; Meetings; Officers O.C.G.A. § 43-26-4 Page 8 General Powers and Responsibilities of the Board O.C.G.A. § 43-26-5 Page 9 Use of Certain Titles and Abbreviations by Licensed Nurses O.C.G.A. § 43-26-6 Page 11 Requirements for Licensure as a Registered Professional Nurse O.C.G.A. § 43-26-7 Page 12 Temporary Permits O.C.G.A. § 43-26-8 Page 16 Biennial Renewal of Licenses; Continuing Competency O.C.G.A. § 43-26-9 Page 17 Requirements Inactive Status O.C.G.A. § 43-26-9.1 Page 18 Practicing as a Registered Professional Nurse Without a License O.C.G.A. § 43-26-10 Page 18 Prohibited Denial or Revocation of Licenses; Other Discipline O.C.G.A. § 43-26-11 Page 19 Administration of Anesthesia By Certified Registered Nurse O.C.G.A. § 43-26-11.1 Page 20 Anesthetist Exceptions to Licensure O.C.G.A. § 43-26-12 Page 20 Certain Information Given to the Board by Licensees O.C.G.A. § 43-26-13 Page 23 Article Two Licensed Practical Nurses Page Title Code Section Number Short Title O.C.G.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Benefits of Using Standardized Nursing Terminology
    Page 1 of 20 Selecting a Standardized Terminology for the Electronic Health Record that Reveals the Impact of Nursing on Patient Care By Cynthia B. Lundberg, R.N., BSN; SNOMED Terminology Solutions; Judith J. Warren, PhD, RN, BC, FAAN, FACMI; University of Kansas; Jane Brokel, PhD, RN, NANDA International; Gloria M. Bulechek, PhD, RN, FAAN; Nursing Interventions Classification; Howard K. Butcher, PhD, RN, APRN, BC; Nursing Interventions Classification; Joanne McCloskey Dochterman, PhD, RN, FAAN; Nursing Interventions Classification; Marion Johnson, PhD, RN; Nursing Outcomes Classification; Meridean Maas PhD, RN; Nursing Outcomes Classification; Karen S. Martin, RN, NSN, FAAN; Omaha System; Sue Moorhead PhD, RN, Nursing Outcomes Classification; Christine Spisla, RN, MSN; SNOMED Terminology Solutions; Elizabeth Swanson, PhD, RN; Nursing Outcomes Classification, Sharon Giarrizzo-Wilson, RN, BSN/MS, CNOR, Association of PeriOperative Registered Nurses Citation: Lundberg, C., Warren, J.., Brokel, J., Bulechek, G., Butcher, H., McCloskey Dochterman, J., Johnson, M., Mass, M., Martin, K., Moorhead, S., Spisla, C., Swanson, E., & Giarrizzo-Wilson, S. (June, 2008). Selecting a Standardized Terminology for the Electronic Health Record that Reveals the Impact of Nursing on Patient Care. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics (OJNI), 12, (2). Available at http:ojni.org/12_2/lundberg.pdf Page 2 of 20 Abstract Using standardized terminology within electronic health records is critical for nurses to communicate their impact on patient care to the multidisciplinary team. The universal requirement for quality patient care, internal control, efficiency and cost containment, has made it imperative to express nursing knowledge in a meaningful way that can be shared across disciplines and care settings. The documentation of nursing care, using an electronic health record, demonstrates the impact of nursing care on patient care and validates the significance of nursing practice.
    [Show full text]