NASA's Artemis Missions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NASA's Artemis Missions NASA’s Artemis Missions: Science and Exploration of the Lunar South Pole Dr. Michael Evans NASA/Johnson Space Center (JSC) Astromaterials Reseach and Exploration Science (ARES) Planetary Scientist 1 ARTEMIS PROGRAM: NASA Space Policy Directive 1 “Beginning with missions beyond low-Earth orbit, the United States will lead the return of humans to the Moon for long-term exploration and utilization, followed by human missions to Mars and other destinations” (Trump, 12/11/17) National Space Council VP Pence outlines goals for NASA (3/26/19) • NASA landing on the Moon’s South Pole by 2024 (with a female astronaut) • Fly Exploration Mission-1 (EM-1) with Orion on the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket in 2020 and send the first crewed mission to the lunar vicinity by 2022 • NASA will continue to ‘use all means necessary’ to ensure mission success in moving us forward to the Moon (using commercial resources as available). LRO Flies Over Shackleton Crater Near South Pole 2 From NASA Advisory Council meeting at KSC (Oct 2019), see 3 https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/20191030-nac-heoc-smith-v3.pdf From NASA Advisory Council meeting at KSC (Oct 2019), see 4 https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/20191030-nac-heoc-smith-v3.pdf NASA’S PAST DECADE OF HUMAN PLANETARY EXPLORATION STUDIES 5 Brief History of NASA Human Exploration Studies From NASA Advisory Council meeting at KSC (Oct 2019), see 6 https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/20191030-nac-heoc-smith-v3.pdf Constellation Program to the Moon (2005-2009) Altair Lander 7 Post-Constellation Lunar Plans Deep Space Habitat (2012) http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/technology/deep_space_habitat/constructing-demonstrators.html 8 https://www.nasa.gov/feature/nextstep-partnerships-develop-ground-prototypes NextSTEP Concepts (2016) Lockheed Martin concept Sierra Nevada concept Boeing concept Bigelow concept, https://observer.com/2019/09/ nasa-bigelow-b330-space- Orbital ATK (Cygnus) concept habitat-lunar-gateway/ 9 NEXTSTEP HABITATION PROTOTYPE TESTING (2018-2019) From NASA Advisory Council meeting at KSC (Oct 2019), see 10 https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/20191030-nac-heoc-smith-v3.pdf Deep Space Gateway (2017) http://www.russianspaceweb.com/imp-2017.html 11 Lunar Orbital Platform – Gateway (2018) http://thespacereview.com/article/3529/1 12 Bigger Gateway (2019) https://www.nasa.gov/feature/multilateral-coordination-board-joint-statement 13 Smaller MiniHab Gateway (2019) https://spacenews.com/industry-wants-nasa-to- http://www.parabolicarc.com/tag/lunar-gateway/ move-ahead-quickly-on-gateway-module/ 14 HALO Gateway (2020) From NASA Advisory Council meeting at KSC (Oct 2019), see https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/20191030-nac-heoc-smith-v3.pdf 15 COMPONENTS OF ARTEMIS 16 Space Launch System (SLS) 17 SLS Booster 18 SLS Engines from Shuttle SSME design 19 SLS x x 20 ORION CREW MODULE Orion Website: http://spaceflight101.com/spacecraft/orion/ Best guess of schedule (from Houston Chronicle, 10/10/18) • EFT1 12/5/14, launched atop Delta IV Heavy rocket, unmanned • EM1 (mid-2020?, unmanned capsule on SLS) • EM2 (2022), SLS launch crew to moon, deliver Gateway PPE node 21 ESA PARTICIPATION • European Service Module (ESM) • Main Engine from Shuttle Orbital Maneuvering System (OMS) (bipropellant: hydrazine and nitrogen tetroxide) • Too little ∆V for both delivery to and from Low Lunar Orbit (LLO) 22 Power and Propulsion Element (PPE) by MAXAR http://www.russianspaceweb.com/imp-ppb.html http://www.satnews.com/story.php?number=1232377005 http://www.parabolicarc.com/2019/05/23/maxar-teams-blue- origin-draper-lunar-gateway-power-propulsion-element/ 23 From NASA Advisory Council meeting at KSC (Oct 2019), see 24 https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/20191030-nac-heoc-smith-v3.pdf HALO (modified Cygnus Module) by Northrop Grumman Proposed HALO for Gateway (without docking ports) Cygnus Module on ISS: https://spacenews.com/nasa-to-sole-source-gateway- http://cdn.parabolicarc.com/wp- habitation-module-to-northrop-grumman/ content/uploads/2019/04/ISS_april192019.jpg 25 From NASA Advisory Council meeting at KSC (Oct 2019), see 26 https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/20191030-nac-heoc-smith-v3.pdf From NASA Advisory Council meeting at KSC (Oct 2019), see 27 https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/20191030-nac-heoc-smith-v3.pdf From NASA Advisory Council meeting at KSC (Oct 2019), see 28 https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/20191030-nac-heoc-smith-v3.pdf NASA Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) • Initial CLPS announcement of 9 companies on 11/29/18 • More CLPS Providers added 11/18/19 (Blue Origin and SpaceX) • Current list of CLPS Providers: Astrobotic Technology | Blue Origin | Ceres Robotics | Deep Space Systems | Draper | Firefly Aerospace | Intuitive Machines | Lockheed Martin Space | Masten Space Systems | Moon Express | Orbit Beyond | Sierra Nevada Corporation | SpaceX | Tyvak Nano- Satellite Systems • 12 NASA payloads and experiments selected on 2/21/19 • 12 additional NASA Payloads and experiments selected on 7/1/19 • First two deliveries to Moon planned for July 2021 Peregrine by Astrobotic Technology Nova-C by Intuitive Machines 29 Transport Systems on the Lunar Surface Lunar Surface Science Mobility System (LSSMS-1) • Science Mission Directorate (SMD) RFI issued 2/5/20, due 3/6/20 • https://beta.sam.gov/opp/14d4f43f22d94fd7b003e98b8e253c95/view?keywords =NASA&sort=-modifiedDate&index=&is_active=true&page=1 • UNCREWED robotic system to transport and operate scientific and exploration instruments on the lunar surface. Range of payload mass from 10’s to 1000’s kg. Lunar Terrain Vehicle (LTV) • Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate (HEOMD) RFI issued 2/5/20, due 2/26/20 • https://beta.sam.gov/opp/46cd587dcba34a8e96792f26d3c7a8d8/view • Human-class rover to carry 2 EVA suited astronauts in excess of 2 km using electric propulsion. It will be delivered to the Moon on a CLPS lander and must carry 500kgs and survive in a South Pole night. 30 COMMERCIAL LAUNCH VEHICLES • SpaceX • Falcon 9 (Earth) 2010-2018, partially reusable • Falcon Heavy (Lunar) 2018, partially reusable • StarShip/Super Heavy (Mars) >2020?, fully reusable? • Initial tests in 2019 completed • United Launch Alliance (ULA) • Vulcan (Lunar) 2021?, partially reusable • Blue Origin • New Shepard (Suborbital), partially reusable • New Glenn (Lunar?) 2021?, partially reusable • New Armstrong (Lunar)? • Tourism? • 2001-2009, Russian Soyuz capsule delivered 7 space tourists to ISS via company “Space Adventures” • In September, 2018 SpaceX contracted to fly 6-8 private passengers around the moon in 2023 31 COMMERCIAL ISS PARTNERS (2020?) • SpaceX Dragon • Boeing Starliner https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/assets/38594.0/1206920.jpg 32 THE LUNAR SOUTH POLE 33 ARTEMIS PROGRAM: Exploration of the lunar South Pole region has a number of unique challenges: • Very steep slopes in large craters (Shackleton Crater at the South Pole) • Persistently Illuminated Regions (PIRs) provide regions of nearly constant sunlight • Deep Permanently Shadowed Regions (PSRs) are very cold and never sunlight, and may contain volatiles and water ice (some are very close to the PIRs) YOUTUBE Videos regarding illumination: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1OIDCXd2v8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbjbH-LOPtk LRO Flies Over Shackleton Crater Near South Pole 34 From NASA Advisory Council meeting at KSC (Oct 2019), see 35 https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/20191030-nac-heoc-smith-v3.pdf Geologic Map of the Lunar South Pole Region Relative Age Youngest Copernican Eratosthenian Imbrian Nectarian Oldest Pre-Nectarian Subscripts: c, crater materials; p, plains materials; m, massif Geology of Shackleton Crater and the south pole of material; pl, platform massif material; and sc, satellitic crater (i.e., basin secondary) material [1, Imbrium basin; 2, Orientale the Moon basin secondaries]; and t, terra material. P.D. Spudis et al., 2008 Geophysical Research Letters 35: L14201, doi:10.1029/2008GL034468 36 Water Ice Inferred by Orbital Detection Lunar Exploration Neutron Detector (LEND) of Hydrogen on the Lunar Surface Lunar South Pole WEH = Water Equivalent Hydrogen Hydrogen distribution in the lunar polar regions A.B. Sanin et al., 2017, Icarus 283:20-30 37 From NASA Advisory Council meeting at KSC (Oct 2019), see 38 https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/20191030-nac-heoc-smith-v3.pdf From NASA Advisory Council meeting at KSC (Oct 2019), see 39 https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/20191030-nac-heoc-smith-v3.pdf CISLUNAR ORBITS: NRHO vs. LLO From NASA Advisory Council meeting at KSC (Oct 2019), see https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/20191030-nac-heoc-smith-v3.pdf 40 From NASA Advisory Council meeting at KSC (Oct 2019), see 41 https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/20191030-nac-heoc-smith-v3.pdf From NASA Advisory Council meeting at KSC (Oct 2019), see 42 https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/20191030-nac-heoc-smith-v3.pdf THE SCHEDULE FOR ARTEMIS 43 NASA EXPLORATION PLANS https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2018/09/nasa-lunar-gateway-plans/ 44 NASA Artemis Program (2019) https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-administrator-to-make-artemis-moon-program-announcement-media-teleconference-set 45 From NASA Advisory Council meeting at KSC (Oct 2019), see 46 https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/20191030-nac-heoc-smith-v3.pdf.
Recommended publications
  • LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned
    Space Sci Rev DOI 10.1007/s11214-011-9759-y LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned Jennifer L. Heldmann · Anthony Colaprete · Diane H. Wooden · Robert F. Ackermann · David D. Acton · Peter R. Backus · Vanessa Bailey · Jesse G. Ball · William C. Barott · Samantha K. Blair · Marc W. Buie · Shawn Callahan · Nancy J. Chanover · Young-Jun Choi · Al Conrad · Dolores M. Coulson · Kirk B. Crawford · Russell DeHart · Imke de Pater · Michael Disanti · James R. Forster · Reiko Furusho · Tetsuharu Fuse · Tom Geballe · J. Duane Gibson · David Goldstein · Stephen A. Gregory · David J. Gutierrez · Ryan T. Hamilton · Taiga Hamura · David E. Harker · Gerry R. Harp · Junichi Haruyama · Morag Hastie · Yutaka Hayano · Phillip Hinz · Peng K. Hong · Steven P. James · Toshihiko Kadono · Hideyo Kawakita · Michael S. Kelley · Daryl L. Kim · Kosuke Kurosawa · Duk-Hang Lee · Michael Long · Paul G. Lucey · Keith Marach · Anthony C. Matulonis · Richard M. McDermid · Russet McMillan · Charles Miller · Hong-Kyu Moon · Ryosuke Nakamura · Hirotomo Noda · Natsuko Okamura · Lawrence Ong · Dallan Porter · Jeffery J. Puschell · John T. Rayner · J. Jedadiah Rembold · Katherine C. Roth · Richard J. Rudy · Ray W. Russell · Eileen V. Ryan · William H. Ryan · Tomohiko Sekiguchi · Yasuhito Sekine · Mark A. Skinner · Mitsuru Sôma · Andrew W. Stephens · Alex Storrs · Robert M. Suggs · Seiji Sugita · Eon-Chang Sung · Naruhisa Takatoh · Jill C. Tarter · Scott M. Taylor · Hiroshi Terada · Chadwick J. Trujillo · Vidhya Vaitheeswaran · Faith Vilas · Brian D. Walls · Jun-ihi Watanabe · William J. Welch · Charles E. Woodward · Hong-Suh Yim · Eliot F. Young Received: 9 October 2010 / Accepted: 8 February 2011 © The Author(s) 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Flight Opportunities and Small Spacecraft Technology Program Updates NAC Technology, Innovation and Engineering Committee Meeting | March 19, 2020
    Flight Opportunities and Small Spacecraft Technology Program Updates NAC Technology, Innovation and Engineering Committee Meeting | March 19, 2020 Christopher Baker NASA Space Technology Mission Directorate Flight Opportunities and Small Spacecraft Technology Program Executive National Aeronautics and Space Administration 1 CHANGING THE PACE OF SPACE Through Small Spacecraft Technology and Flight Opportunities, Space Tech is pursuing the rapid identification, development, and testing of capabilities that exploit agile spacecraft platforms and responsive launch capabilities to increase the pace of space exploration, discovery, and the expansion of space commerce. National Aeronautics and Space Administration 2 THROUGH SUBORBITAL FLIGHT The Flight Opportunities program facilitates rapid demonstration of promising technologies for space exploration, discovery, and the expansion of space commerce through suborbital testing with industry flight providers LEARN MORE: WWW.NASA.GOV/TECHNOLOGY Photo Credit: Blue Origin National Aeronautics and Space Administration 3 FLIGHT OPPORTUNITIES BY THE NUMBERS Between 2011 and today… In 2019 alone… Supported 195 successful fights Supported 15 successful fights Enabled 676 tests of payloads Enabled 47 tests of payloads 254 technologies in the portfolio 86 technologies in the portfolio 13 active commercial providers 9 active commercial providers National Aeronautics and Space Administration Numbers current as of March 1, 2020 4 TECHNOLOGY TESTED IN SUBORBITAL Lunar Payloads ISS SPACE IS GOING TO EARTH ORBIT, THE MOON, MARS, AND BEYOND Mars 2020 Commercial Critical Space Lunar Payload Exploration Services Solutions National Aeronautics and Space Administration 5 SUBORBITAL INFUSION HIGHLIGHT Commercial Lunar Payload Services Four companies selected as Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CPLS) providers leveraged Flight Opportunities-supported suborbital flights to test technologies that are incorporated into their landers and/or are testing lunar landing technologies under Flight Opportunities for others.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Selene: AIAA Lunar Base Camp
    Project Selene: AIAA Lunar Base Camp AIAA Space Mission System 2019-2020 Virginia Tech Aerospace Engineering Faculty Advisor : Dr. Kevin Shinpaugh Team Members : Olivia Arthur, Bobby Aselford, Michel Becker, Patrick Crandall, Heidi Engebreth, Maedini Jayaprakash, Logan Lark, Nico Ortiz, Matthew Pieczynski, Brendan Ventura Member AIAA Number Member AIAA Number And Signature And Signature Faculty Advisor 25807 Dr. Kevin Shinpaugh Brendan Ventura 1109196 Matthew Pieczynski 936900 Team Lead/Operations Logan Lark 902106 Heidi Engebreth 1109232 Structures & Environment Patrick Crandall 1109193 Olivia Arthur 999589 Power & Thermal Maedini Jayaprakash 1085663 Robert Aselford 1109195 CCDH/Operations Michel Becker 1109194 Nico Ortiz 1109533 Attitude, Trajectory, Orbits and Launch Vehicles Contents 1 Symbols and Acronyms 8 2 Executive Summary 9 3 Preface and Introduction 13 3.1 Project Management . 13 3.2 Problem Definition . 14 3.2.1 Background and Motivation . 14 3.2.2 RFP and Description . 14 3.2.3 Project Scope . 15 3.2.4 Disciplines . 15 3.2.5 Societal Sectors . 15 3.2.6 Assumptions . 16 3.2.7 Relevant Capital and Resources . 16 4 Value System Design 17 4.1 Introduction . 17 4.2 Analytical Hierarchical Process . 17 4.2.1 Longevity . 18 4.2.2 Expandability . 19 4.2.3 Scientific Return . 19 4.2.4 Risk . 20 4.2.5 Cost . 21 5 Initial Concept of Operations 21 5.1 Orbital Analysis . 22 5.2 Launch Vehicles . 22 6 Habitat Location 25 6.1 Introduction . 25 6.2 Region Selection . 25 6.3 Locations of Interest . 26 6.4 Eliminated Locations . 26 6.5 Remaining Locations . 27 6.6 Chosen Location .
    [Show full text]
  • Reusable Suborbital Market Characterization
    Reusable Suborbital Market Characterization Prepared by The Tauri Group for Space Florida March 2011 Introduction Purpose: Define and characterize the markets reusable suborbital vehicles will address Goals Define market categories Identify market drivers Characterize current activities Provide basis for future market forecasting (Note that this study is not a forecast) Benefits Shared understanding improves quality and productivity of industry discourse A consistent taxonomy enables communications across the community, with Congress, press, and investors Accessible information helps industry participants assess opportunities, plan and coordinate activities, seek funding, and budget Proprietary www.taurigroup.com 2 Agenda Methodology Suborbital spaceflight attributes and vehicles Value proposition Characterization and analysis of markets Commercial human spaceflight Basic and applied research Aerospace technology test and demonstration Remote sensing Education Media & PR Point-to-point transportation Conclusions Proprietary www.taurigroup.com 3 Methodology Literature review and data Analysis and findings collection Vehicles Articles, reports, and publications Payload types Available launch and research Markets datasets Opportunities Applicable payloads Challenges Initial customers Users Interviews Economic buyers Researchers Launch service providers Funding agencies Potential commercial customers Users Proprietary www.taurigroup.com 4 Reusable Suborbital Vehicles Industry catalyzed by Ansari X
    [Show full text]
  • Constellation Program Overview
    Constellation Program Overview October 2008 hris Culbert anager, Lunar Surface Systems Project Office ASA/Johnson Space Center Constellation Program EarthEarth DepartureDeparture OrionOrion -- StageStage CrewCrew ExplorationExploration VehicleVehicle AresAres VV -- HeavyHeavy LiftLift LaunchLaunch VehicleVehicle AltairAltair LunarLunar LanderLander AresAres II -- CrewCrew LaunchLaunch VehicleVehicle Lunar Capabilities Concept Review EstablishedEstablished Lunar Lunar Transportation Transportation EstablishEstablish Lunar Lunar Surface SurfaceArchitecturesArchitectures ArchitectureArchitecture Point Point of of Departure: Departure: StrategiesStrategies which: which: Satisfy NASA NGO’s to acceptable degree ProvidesProvides crew crew & & cargo cargo delivery delivery to to & & from from the the Satisfy NASA NGO’s to acceptable degree within acceptable schedule moonmoon within acceptable schedule Are consistent with capacity and capabilities ProvidesProvides capacity capacity and and ca capabilitiespabilities consistent consistent Are consistent with capacity and capabilities withwith candidate candidate surface surface architectures architectures ofof the the transportation transportation systems systems ProvidesProvides sufficient sufficient performance performance margins margins IncludeInclude set set of of options options fo for rvarious various prioritizations prioritizations of cost, schedule & risk RemainsRemains within within programmatic programmatic constraints constraints of cost, schedule & risk ResultsResults in in acceptable
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Flight Opportunities Space Technology Mission Directorate
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Flight Opportunities Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) NASA’s Flight Opportunities program strives to advance the operational readiness of innovative space technologies while also stimulating the development and utilization of the U.S. commercial spaceflight industry, particularly for the suborbital and small How to launch vehicle markets. Since its initiation in 2010, the program has provided affordable Access Flight access to relevant space-like environments for over 100 payloads across a variety of Opportunities flight platforms. There are currently two paths for accessing flight test opportunities: Space Technology Research, Development, Demonstration, and Infusion (REDDI) External researchers can compete for flight funding through the REDDI NASA Research Announcement (NRA). Awardees receive a grant allowing them to directly purchase flights from U.S. commercial flight vendors that best meet their needs. The solicitation is biannual. Suborbital Reusable High-Altitude Balloon Parabolic Aircraft Launch Vehicles (sRLV) Systems These platforms enable NASA Internal Call for sRLVs enable a wide variety of These systems facilitate impact investigation of short-term Payloads experiments, such as testing studies on extended exposure exposure to reduced gravity, This path facilitates algorithms for landing or to cold, atmosphere, and with typical missions flying suborbital flight hazard avoidance, or evaluating radiation. In addition, high approximately 40 parabolas demonstrations for the response of systems to altitude balloons enable testing providing several seconds of technologies under microgravity. of sensors and instruments for reduced gravity during the flight. development by NASA and a variety of applications. other government agencies. Typical parabolic vehicles include Typical vehicles include Blue Zero G’s G-FORCE ONE.
    [Show full text]
  • Lunar Trajectories
    Transportation for Exploration: New Thoughts About Orbital Dynamics Ed Belbruno Innovative Orbital Design, Inc & Courant Insitiute(NYU) January 4, 2012 NASA FISO 1 Evolution of Astrodynamics Conic; Stable (Hohmann, 20s) (Hohmann transfers, Gravity assist(Voyager, Galileo)) Nonlinear; Stable (Apollo, 60s) Nonlinear; Unstable (ISEE-3, 70s) (Transfer to and from halo orbits, no utilization of fuel savings via dynamics – Farquhar …) Nonlinear; Unstable; Low Energy/Fuel (Hiten, 91) (First use of utilization of chaotic dynamics/manifolds to achieve new approach to space travel for ballistic capture(EB, 86, 91) and for the study of halo orbit dynamics (Llibre-Simo, 85 – Genesis, 2001) Weak Stability Boundary Theory (EB 86) 2 Hohmann Transfer Conic, Stable – 2-body 3 Figure Eight(Apollo) Nonlinear, Stable – 3-body 4 ISEEC-3 Nonlinear-Unstable – 4 body 5 Ballistic Capture Transfers Weak Stability Boundary Theory(EB 86) • Way to transfer to the Moon, and other bodies, where no DeltaV is needed for capture • New methodology to trajectory design • Thought in 1985 to be impossible 6 Background • Capture Problem Earth -> Moon (LEO -> LLO) • Hohmann Transfer: Fast (3days), Fuel Hog (Need to slow down! 1 km/s to be captured – large maneuver ) Risky Used in Apollo 7 Idea of Achieving Ballistic Capture • Sneak up on Moon - very carefully (next figure A-B-C-D) • Like a surfer catching a wave • Want to ride the „gravity transition(weak stability) boundary‟ between the Earth-Moon-Sun 8 Top – Lagrange points Bottom – Sneaking up on Moon 9 Ballistic capture is chaotic (chaos – leaf blowing in wind) 10 • WSB – generalization of Lagrange points • Forces(GM, GE, CF) balance while spacecraft moving wrt Earth-Moon (L-points – forces balance for spacecraft fixed wrt Earth-Moon) • Get a multi-dimensional region about Moon.
    [Show full text]
  • Go for Lunar Landing Conference Report
    CONFERENCE REPORT Sponsored by: REPORT OF THE GO FOR LUNAR LANDING: FROM TERMINAL DESCENT TO TOUCHDOWN CONFERENCE March 4-5, 2008 Fiesta Inn, Tempe, AZ Sponsors: Arizona State University Lunar and Planetary Institute University of Arizona Report Editors: William Gregory Wayne Ottinger Mark Robinson Harrison Schmitt Samuel J. Lawrence, Executive Editor Organizing Committee: William Gregory, Co-Chair, Honeywell International Wayne Ottinger, Co-Chair, NASA and Bell Aerosystems, retired Roberto Fufaro, University of Arizona Kip Hodges, Arizona State University Samuel J. Lawrence, Arizona State University Wendell Mendell, NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Clive Neal, University of Notre Dame Charles Oman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology James Rice, Arizona State University Mark Robinson, Arizona State University Cindy Ryan, Arizona State University Harrison H. Schmitt, NASA, retired Rick Shangraw, Arizona State University Camelia Skiba, Arizona State University Nicolé A. Staab, Arizona State University i Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................2 Notes...............................................................................................................................3 THE APOLLO EXPERIENCE............................................................................................4 Panelists...........................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights in Space 2010
    International Astronautical Federation Committee on Space Research International Institute of Space Law 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren c/o CNES 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren UNITED NATIONS 75015 Paris, France 2 place Maurice Quentin 75015 Paris, France Tel: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 Tel. + 33 1 44 76 75 10 E-mail: : [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Fax. + 33 1 44 76 74 37 URL: www.iislweb.com OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS URL: www.iafastro.com E-mail: [email protected] URL : http://cosparhq.cnes.fr Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs is responsible for promoting international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space and assisting developing countries in using space science and technology. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs P. O. Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26060-4950 Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5830 E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.unoosa.org United Nations publication Printed in Austria USD 15 Sales No. E.11.I.3 ISBN 978-92-1-101236-1 ST/SPACE/57 *1180239* V.11-80239—January 2011—775 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT VIENNA Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law Progress in space science, technology and applications, international cooperation and space law UNITED NATIONS New York, 2011 UniTEd NationS PUblication Sales no.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Human Factors on Future Long Duration Human Space Exploration Missions En Route to Mars
    Open Archive TOULOUSE Archive Ouverte ( OATAO ) OATAO is an open access repository that collects the work of Toulouse researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible. This is an author-deposited version published in : http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/ Eprints ID : 13827 To cite this version : Ferraioli, Giuseppe and Causse, Mickael and Lizy-Destrez, Stéphanie and Gourinat, Yves Habitability of manned vehicules : the impact of human factors on future long duration human space exploration missions en route to Mars. (2015) In: 64th International Astronautical Congress, Beijing, China, September 23-27, 2013, 2013 - 2013 (Beijing, China). Any correspondance concerning this service should be sent to the repository administrator: [email protected] HABITABILITY OF MANNED VEHICLES: THE IMPACT OF HUMAN FACTORS ON FUTURE LONG DURATION HUMAN SPACE EXPLORATION MISSIONS EN ROUTE TO MARS Giuseppe Ferraioli ISAE - Institut Sup´erieurde l'A´eronautiqueet de l'Espace, Italy, [email protected] Dr. Mickael Causse ISAE, France, [email protected] Mrs. St´ephanie Lizy-Destrez ISAE, France, [email protected] Prof. Yves Gourinat ISAE, France, [email protected] August 3, 2013 Abstract Placing humans in space for a long duration mission beyond Earth's neighborhood implies the design of a highly complex system to travel, live and work safely in the hostile environment of deep space. In order to identify all the constraints from both engineering and human sides, a meticulous system engineering approach has to be followed and the human sciences, including incorporation of ideas from artists, ergonomists and psychologists, have to be integrated in the very early stages of the mission design.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Thesis
    Master’s Thesis 2018 30 ECTS Department of International Environment and Development Studies Katharina Glaab Dividing Heaven: Investigating the Influence of the U.S. Ban on Cooperation with China on the Development of Global Outer Space Governance Robert Ronci International Relations LANDSAM The Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Noragric, is the international gateway for the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU). Established in 1986, Noragric’s contribution to international development lies in the interface between research, education (Bachelor, Master and PhD programmes) and assignments. The Noragric Master’s theses are the final theses submitted by students in order to fulfil the requirements under the Noragric Master’s programmes ‘International Environmental Studies’, ‘International Development Studies’ and ‘International Relations’. The findings in this thesis do not necessarily reflect the views of Noragric. Extracts from this publication may only be reproduced after prior consultation with the author and on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation contact Noragric. © Robert Ronci, May 2018 [email protected] Noragric Department of International Environment and Development Studies The Faculty of Landscape and Society P.O. Box 5003 N-1432 Ås Norway Tel.: +47 67 23 00 00 Internet: https://www.nmbu.no/fakultet/landsam/institutt/noragric i ii Declaration I, Robert Jay Ronci, declare that this thesis is a result of my research investigations and findings. Sources of information other than my own have been acknowledged and a reference list has been appended. This work has not been previously submitted to any other university for award of any type of academic degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Act Agreement Between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and Moon Express Inc. for Lunar Catalyst Article 1
    SPACE ACT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION AND MOON EXPRESS INC. FOR LUNAR CATALYST ARTICLE 1. AUTHORITY AND PARTIES In accordance with the National Aeronautics and Space Act (51 U.S.C. § 20113), this Agreement is entered into by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, located at 300 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20546 (hereinafter referred to as "NASA") and Moon Express, Inc. located at 100 Space Port Way, Cape Canaveral, Florida 32920 (hereinafter referred to as "Partner" or "Moon Express"). NASA and Partner may be individually referred to as a "Party" and collectively referred to as the "Parties." ARTICLE 2. PURPOSE This agreement is an amended version of Space Act Agreement #18251, which went into effect on September 30, 2014. NASA recognizes that private-sector investment in technologies intended to enable commercial lunar activities has been increasing. In addition to recognizing these activities NASA wants to encourage and enable commercial successes to cultivate the increased innovation and entrepreneurship in the commercial space transportation sector. The “Lunar Cargo Transportation and Landing by Soft Touchdown” (Lunar CATALYST) initiative, is consistent with the National Space Transportation Policy. Per this policy, NASA is “committed to encouraging and facilitating a viable, healthy, and competitive U.S. Commercial space transportation industry”. This initiative also supports the internationally shared space exploration goals of the Global Exploration Roadmap (GER) that NASA and 11 other space agencies around the world released in August 2013. The GER acknowledges the value of public-private partnerships and commercial services to enable sustainable exploration of asteroids, the Moon and Mars.
    [Show full text]