OECD Review of Policies to Improve the Effectiveness of Resource Use in Schools (School Resources Review)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

OECD Review of Policies to Improve the Effectiveness of Resource Use in Schools (School Resources Review) OECD Review of Policies to Improve the Effectiveness of Resource Use in Schools (School Resources Review) Country Background Report for Uruguay INEED August, 2015 Cecilia Llambí (coord.) Lucía Castro Melissa Hernández Cecilia Oreiro This report was prepared by the National Institute for Educational Evaluation (INEED) as an input to the OECD Review of Policies to Improve the Effectiveness of Resource Use in Schools (School Resources Review). The document was prepared in response to guidelines the OECD provided to all countries. The opinions expressed are not those of the OECD or its Member countries. Further information about the OECD Review is available atwww.oecd.org/edu/school/schoolresourcesreview.htm. Table of contents List of acronyms ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Glossary of terms .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 6 1. The national context ............................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 The economic and social context .......................................................................................................... 12 1.2 Demographic developments .................................................................................................................. 14 1.3 Political context .................................................................................................................................... 15 1.4 Public sector management .................................................................................................................... 17 2. The school system ................................................................................................................................... 19 2.1 Organization of the school system ........................................................................................................ 19 2.2 Educational environment ...................................................................................................................... 26 2.3 Objectives of the education system and student learning objectives .................................................... 27 2.4 Distribution of responsibilities within the school system ...................................................................... 30 2.5 Market mechanisms in the school system ............................................................................................. 37 2.6 Performance of the school system ......................................................................................................... 38 2.7 Policy approaches to equity in education ............................................................................................. 48 2.8 Main challenges .................................................................................................................................... 57 3. Governance of resource use in schools ................................................................................................... 61 3.1 Level of resources and policy concerns ............................................................................................ 61 3.2 Sources of revenue ................................................................................................................................ 75 3.3 Planning of resource use ...................................................................................................................... 77 3.4 Implementation of policies to improve the effectiveness of resource use ............................................. 82 3.5 Main challenges .................................................................................................................................... 83 4. Resource distribution .............................................................................................................................. 85 4.1 Distribution of resources between levels of the educational administration ........................................ 85 4.2 Distribution of financial resources across resource types .................................................................... 86 4.3 Distribution of resources between levels and sectors of the school system .......................................... 87 4.4 Distribution of resources across individual schools ............................................................................. 87 4.5 Distribution of school facilities and materials ...................................................................................... 90 4.6 - 4.7 Distribution of teacher resources and school leadership resources ............................................ 94 4.8 Distribution across specific student groups ........................................................................................ 106 4.9. Main challenges ................................................................................................................................. 107 1 5. Resource utilisation ............................................................................................................................... 111 5.1 Matching resources to individual student learning needs .................................................................. 111 5.2 Organisation of student learning time ................................................................................................ 112 5.3 Allocation of teacher resources to students ........................................................................................ 117 5.4 Organisation of school leadership ...................................................................................................... 128 5.5 Teaching and learning environment within school ............................................................................. 129 5.6 Use of school facilities and materials ................................................................................................. 131 5.7 Organisation of education governance ............................................................................................... 131 5.8 Main challenges .................................................................................................................................. 135 6. Resource management .......................................................................................................................... 139 6.1 Resource management and capacity building..................................................................................... 139 6.2 Monitoring of resource use ................................................................................................................. 140 6.3 Transparency and reporting ............................................................................................................... 142 6.4 Incentives for the Effective use of resources ....................................................................................... 142 6.5 Main Challenges ................................................................................................................................. 142 References ................................................................................................................................................. 144 Figures and charts references .................................................................................................................... 148 2 List of acronyms Acronym Spanish English AFAM-PE Asignación Familiar del Plan de Equidad Family Allowances - Equity Plan Asociación de Funcionarios de la Universidad Staff Association of the Uruguayan AFUTU de Trabajo del Uruguay University of Labour (UTU) Asociación de Institutos de la Educación Association of Institutes in Private AIDEP Privada Education Administración Nacional de Educación ANEP National Public Education Administration Pública Association of Parents and Friends of the APAL Asociación de Padres y Amigos del Liceo Lyceum ATD Asamblea Técnico Docente Teacher Technical Assembly Uruguayan Association of Catholic AUDEC Asociación Uruguaya de Educación Católica Education BCU Banco Central del Uruguay Central Bank of Uruguay BID (IADB) Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo Inter-American Development Bank BPC Base de Prestaciones y Contribuciones Benefits and Contributions Basis CAIF Centro de Atención a la Infancia y la Familia Childcare and Family Centre Comisión Coordinadora Departamental de la Departmental Coordinating Commission CDE Educación for Education CEIP Consejo de Educación Inicial Primaria Preschool and Primary Education Council CEPI Centro Educativo Primera Infancia Educational Centre of Early Childhood CERP Centro Regional de Profesores Regional Centre for Teachers CES Consejo de Educación Secundaria Secondary Education Council Professional -Vocational Education CETP Consejo de Educación Técnico-Profesional Council CFE Consejo de Formación en Educación Teacher Training Council CODICEN Consejo Directivo Central Central Governing Council COMINE Comisión Nacional de Educación National Education Commission Cuidado e Inclusión Socioeducativa para la Care and Socio-educational Inclusion for CISEPI Primera
Recommended publications
  • Democracy and Educational Expansion: Evidence from 200 Years
    Democracy and Educational Expansion: Evidence from 200 Years Agustina S. Paglayan - UC San Diego LSE-Stanford-Universidad de los Andes Conference on Long-Run Development in Latin America, London School of Economics and Political Science, 16-17 May 2018 DEMOCRACY AND EDUCATIONAL EXPANSION: EVIDENCE FROM 200 YEARS Agustina S. Paglayan* June 1, 2018 Because primary education is often conceptualized as a pro-poor redistributive policy, a common political economy argument is that democratization leads to increases in its provision. But primary education can also serve the goals of autocratic regimes, including industrialization, inculcation of loyalty, and nation- building. To examine the relationship between regime type and education provision empirically, this paper leverages new country-level datasets spanning 200 years. Difference-in-differences and interrupted time series estimates indicate that democratization had no or little impact on primary school enrollment rates. The analysis reveals two historical patterns that can explain this null finding: first, state-controlled primary education systems emerged about a century before democratization; and second, in most countries, a large majority of the population already had access to primary education before democratization. These findings challenge the centrality given to democracy and the enfranchisement of the poor in existing theories of what drives governments to provide basic education. * Assistant professor of political science and public policy, UCSD (starting July 2018); and postdoctoral
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Education.Pdf
    1 CDD 300 ISSN: 1510-5628 Serie Documentos de Trabajo del IPES / Colección Monitor Social Nº8 Uruguay asiste a una radical transformación de su matriz social y de sus mecanismos de integración social. El Monitor Social del Uruguay recoge los aportes de los investigadores del IPES a la comprensión de dichas transformaciones y de la realidad actual del Uruguay social. Este Monitor pretende aportar información y análisis que permita el seguimiento de la situación social de los uruguayos. Mediante tales aportes se busca contribuir a modelar agendas sociales así como lograr una mejor comprensión de las dinámicas económicas y sociales que operan en la producción de desigualdad, pobreza y exclusión social del Uruguay. Programa IPES Facultad de Ciencias Humanas Universidad Católica del Uruguay Dep. Legal 326.861 2 © 2006, Universidad Católica del Uruguay Para obtener la autorización para la reproducción o traducción total o parcial de este documento debe formularse la correspondiente solicitud a la Universidad Católica del Uruguay (IPES), solicitud que será bien acogida. No obstante, ciertos extractos breves de esta publicación pueden reproducirse sin autorización, con la condición de que se mencione la fuente. 3 Primary Education: Changing Mainstay of Uruguay Juan A. Bogliaccini La versión original de este trabajo fue publicada en Noblit, G. and Pink, W. (2006) International Handbook of Education. University of North Carolina & Marquette University. USA. 4 ABSTRACT The Uruguayan public educational system is undergoing profound changes in response
    [Show full text]
  • URUGUAY by Pablo Landoni
    URUGUAY by Pablo Landoni Landoni, P. (2012). Uruguay. In C. L. Glenn & J. De Groof (Eds.), Balancing freedom, autonomy and accountability in education: Volume 3 (397-415). Tilburg, NL: Wolf Legal Publishers. Overview In 2008, Uruguay approved a new education law (Ley General de Educación, subsequently LGE),1 as a result of a reform process begun by the new left-of- center government that took office in 2005. The law adopted was a substitute for a law of deep significance, because it was the second law approved after the restoration of democracy in 1985, following a decade of military rule. This previous law2 enjoyed the unanimous support of the political parties and social organization that made up the Comisión Nacional Programática (CONAPRO), a coordinating group for policies as the country returned to democracy. The reform strategy adopted by the government that took office in 2005 has been defined as “bottom-up,”3 in the sense that it was intended that the law be the result of an extensive process of participation by educators and by society. The process began with the so-called “Debate Educativo” organized by a Commission of twenty- two individuals coming from the Ministry of Education, educational institutions, teacher and student organizations, and some civil-society organizations. Political participation was indirect, through the Ministry. The discussion was organized through regional assemblies in the entire country. This process culminated with the National Education Congress in 2006, with more than six hundred delegates from the most diverse civil-society organizations and public and private educational institutions. The opposition political parties stayed aloof from this process.4 In addition to emphasizing the participatory nature of the design of the new education law, there was an effort to distinguish it from earlier reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • How Uruguay Implemented Its Computer Science Education Program
    How Uruguay implemented its computer science education program Brian Fowler Emiliana Vegas March 2021 How Uruguay implemented its computer science education program Brian Fowler is a research analyst in the Center for Universal Education at Brookings. Emiliana Vegas is a senior fellow and co-director of the Center for Universal Education at Brookings. Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to Cristobal Cobo, whose feedback on a previous draft greatly helped improve this version, as well as to Michael Hansen and Yuri Nesen for their edits and suggestions. The Brookings Institution is a nonprofit organization devoted to independent research and policy solutions. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public. The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars. Brookings gratefully acknowledges the support provided by Amazon, Atlassian Foundation International, Google, and Microsoft. Brookings recognizes that the value it provides is in its commitment to quality, independence, and impact. Activities supported by its donors reflect this commitment. Brookings Institution 1 Summary Computer science (CS) education helps students acquire skills such as computational thinking, problem-solving, and collaboration. It has been linked with higher rates of college enrollment (Brown & Brown, 2020; Salehi et al., 2020), and a recent randomized control trial showed that lessons in computational thinking improved student response inhibition, planning, and coding skills (Arfé et al., 2020). Since these skills take preeminence in the rapidly changing 21st century, CS education promises to significantly enhance student preparedness for the future of work and active citizenship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of the Middle Class and the Left in Uruguay: Feelings of Insecurityinsecurity,, Solidaritysolidarity,, and Support for Redistribution
    The Politics of the Middle Class and the Left in Uruguay: Feelings of InsecurityInsecurity,, SolidaritySolidarity,, and Support for Redistribution by Jennifer Fender A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Jennifer Fender 2020 The Politics of the Middle Class and the Left in Uruguay: Feelings of InsecurityInsecurity,, SolidaritySolidarity,, and Support for Redistribution Jennifer Fender Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto 2020 Abstract This dissertation explores the relationships between the middle class and the Left with a specific focus on attitudes towards redistributive policies. The work is based on an examination of the social attitudes and political propensities of the Uruguayan middle class during the Left governments of the Frente Amplio (FA) (2005-2014) including the lead up to their re-election in 2014. In investigating the attitudes and political proclivities of members of the Uruguayan middle class, I incorporate a consideration of the significant political and economic changes that occurred from the middle of the twentieth century onward. The work combines historical analysis and analysis of in-depth interviews conducted by the author. I argue that the presence of two sets of factors that shape individual’s senses of insecurity and solidarity help to explain middle class support for, or opposition to, redistributive policies. One set involves the presence or absence of a complex of insecurity mitigating factors; the second involves socialization processes that inculcate support for the social norms of equality and collective responsibility. I argue that a combination of insecurity mitigating factors and exposure to socialization processes that inculcate norms of equality and collective responsibility, producing social solidarity, tends to contribute to middle class support for the Left and the redistributive measures it stands for.
    [Show full text]
  • A Hypothesis for a History of Theology in Latin America Titulo Dussel
    Appendix II : a hypothesis for a history of theology in Latin America Titulo Dussel, Enrique - Autor/a; Autor(es) A history of the church in Latin America : colonialism to liberation (1492-1979) En: Michigan Lugar WM. B. Erdmans Publishing Editorial/Editor 1981 Fecha Colección Ideologías; Religión; Teología; Historia; Cristianismo; América Latina; Temas Capítulo de Libro Tipo de documento "http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/otros/20120223115942/17appen2.pdf" URL Reconocimiento-No comercial-Sin obras derivadas 2.0 Genérica Licencia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/deed.es Segui buscando en la Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de CLACSO http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO) Conselho Latino-americano de Ciências Sociais (CLACSO) Latin American Council of Social Sciences (CLACSO) www.clacso.edu.ar 306 APPENDIX II A HYPOTHESIS FOR A HISTORY OF THEOLOGY IN LATIN AMERICA I. INTRODUCTION In this brief essay I want to propose a few hypotheses that can facilitate the writing— in the future and as a team in CEHILA—of a larger work on the history of theology in Latin America. We will never develop an understanding of our theological past until we have such a work. It is not absolutely essential for the constitution of a new theology, but it is essential for any definitive maturing of our theology. For this reason, each day that passes makes more necessary a theological reconstruction, but not one less interpretative. On the other hand, it should be pointed out that one could write the history of theology from theology itself; namely, by allowing theology to be the point of departure, and by looking into the internal development of theology as an abstract whole subsisting in itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Uruguay MINIMAL ADVANCEMENT
    Uruguay MINIMAL ADVANCEMENT In 2016, Uruguay made a minimal advancement in efforts to eliminate the worst forms of child labor. The Committee to Prevent and Fight Trafficking in Persons presented a draft of a comprehensive anti-trafficking law to the Parliament and began updating the hazardous work list for children. However, children in Uruguay also engage in the worst forms of child labor, including in garbage scavenging and recycling, as well as commercial sexual exploitation, sometimes as a result of human trafficking. The Government does not collect or publish comprehensive labor and criminal law enforcement statistics or implement sufficient programs to prevent and eliminate the worst forms of child labor. I. PREVALENCE AND SECTORAL DISTRIBUTION OF CHILD LABOR Children in Uruguay engage in the worst forms of child labor, including in garbage scavenging and recycling, and commercial sexual exploitation, sometimes as a result of human trafficking.(1-14) Table 1 provides key indicators on children’s work and education in Uruguay. Table 1. Statistics on Children’s Work and Education Figure 1. Working Children by Sector, Ages 5-14 Children Age Percent Working (% and population) 5 to 14 6.1(31,955) Agriculture Attending School (%) 5 to 14 97.8 28.4% Services Combining Work and School (%) 7 to 14 6.5 59.1% Primary Completion Rate (%) 103.3 Industry 12.5% Source for primary completion rate: Data from 2014, published by UNESCO Institute for Statistics, 2016.(15) Source for all other data: Understanding Children’s Work Project’s analysis of statistics from Encuesta Nacional de Trabajo Infantil (MTI), 2009.(16) Based on a review of available information, Table 2 provides an overview of children’s work by sector and activity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Non-Democratic Roots of Mass Education: Evidence from 200 Years
    EdWorkingPaper No. 20-245 The Non-Democratic Roots of Mass Education: Evidence from 200 Years Agustina S. Paglayan University of California, San Diego Because primary education is often conceptualized as a pro-poor redistributive policy, a common argument is that democratization increases its provision. But primary education can also serve the goals of autocrats, including redistribution, promoting loyalty, nation-building, and/or industrialization. To examine the relationship between democratization and education provision empirically, I leverage new datasets covering 109 countries and 200 years. Difference-in-differences and interrupted time series estimates find that, on average, democratization had no or little impact on primary school enrollment rates. When unpacking this average null result, I find that, consistent with median voter theories, democratization can lead to an expansion of primary schooling, but the key condition under which it does—when a majority lacked access to primary schooling before democratization—rarely holds. Around the world, state-controlled primary schooling emerged a century before democratization, and in three-fourths of countries that democratized, a majority already had access to primary education before democratization. VERSION: June 2020 Suggested citation: Paglayan, Agustina S. (2020). The Non-Democratic Roots of Mass Education: Evidence from 200 Years. (EdWorkingPaper: 20-245). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/y9nj-4957 THE NON-DEMOCRATIC ROOTS OF MASS EDUCATION: EVIDENCE FROM 200 YEARS Agustina S. Paglayan* June 19, 2020 Because primary education is often conceptualized as a pro-poor redistributive policy, a common argument is that democratization increases its provision. But primary education can also serve the goals of autocrats, including redistribution, promoting loyalty, nation-building, and/or industrialization.
    [Show full text]
  • The Speculum of Divine Justice and Obedience in Christian and Islamic Mirrors Fro Princes
    UC Santa Barbara UC Santa Barbara Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Speculum of Divine Justice and Obedience in Christian and Islamic Mirrors fro Princes Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/64835625 Author Puignau, Maria del Rosario Jazmin Publication Date 2014 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara ! ! The Speculum of Divine Justice and Obedience in Christian and Islamic Mirrors for Princes ! ! A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Religious Studies ! by ! Maria del Rosario Jazmín Puignau ! ! Committee in charge: Professor Juan Campo, Chair Professor Stefania Tutino Professor Kathleen Moore ! ! December 2014 The dissertation of Maria del Rosario! Jazmín Puignau is approved. ! ! ! ! ! ____________________________________________________________ Juan Campo, Committee Chair ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ____________________________________________________________ Kathleen Moore ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ____________________________________________________________ Stefania Tutino ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! September 2014 Acknowledgments This study on the theological anxiety of political principles reflects my personal anxiety regarding the legitimate origin of authority and its commitment with justice. Although my original intention was to show the rebellious stream in the traditional views of Christianity and Islam, I finally negotiated into a more moderate approach to both traditions showing the struggle between the competing political and theological principles of justice and obedience. Although all this discussion on justice and the questioning of authority may sound rebellious, this dissertation took shape and was finished while building a more traditional project: my !beautiful family. I want to thank my committee, and especially to acknowledge the role of my mentor and advisor, Professor Juan Campo, who trusted and encouraged my self motivation and my capacity to overcome difficulties.
    [Show full text]
  • Uruguay Naval Academy
    World Maritime University The Maritime Commons: Digital Repository of the World Maritime University World Maritime University Dissertations Dissertations 2000 Uruguay Naval Academy : an investigation into an expanded education role to satisfy the future demands of the maritime industry Carlos Eduardo Abilliera Aris World Maritime University Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.wmu.se/all_dissertations Part of the Higher Education Commons Recommended Citation Abilliera Aris, Carlos Eduardo, "Uruguay Naval Academy : an investigation into an expanded education role to satisfy the future demands of the maritime industry" (2000). World Maritime University Dissertations. 442. http://commons.wmu.se/all_dissertations/442 This Dissertation is brought to you courtesy of Maritime Commons. Open Access items may be downloaded for non-commercial, fair use academic purposes. No items may be hosted on another server or web site without express written permission from the World Maritime University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WORLD MARITIME UNIVERSITY Malmö, Sweden MET (N) Dissertation (first draft) Supervisor: Professor Peter Muirhead by Carlos Abilleira Uruguay S00001 Maritime Education and Training August 7, 2000 DECLARATION I certify that all the material in this dissertation that is not my own work has been identified, and that no material is included for which a degree has previously been conferred on me. The contents of this dissertation reflect my own personal views, and are not necessarily endorsed by the
    [Show full text]
  • Giving Children a Better Start: Preschool Attendance and School-Age Profiles ☆ ⁎ Samuel Berlinski A,B, , Sebastian Galiani C, Marco Manacorda D,E,F
    Journal of Public Economics 92 (2008) 1416–1440 www.elsevier.com/locate/econbase Giving children a better start: Preschool attendance and school-age profiles ☆ ⁎ Samuel Berlinski a,b, , Sebastian Galiani c, Marco Manacorda d,e,f a University College London, UK b Institute for Fiscal Studies, UK c Department of Economics, Washington University in St Louis, Campus Box 1208, St Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA d Queen Mary University of London, UK e CEP, London School of Economics, Houghton Street WC2A 2AE, London, UK f CEPR, USA Received 25 February 2007; received in revised form 23 October 2007; accepted 29 October 2007 Available online 23 December 2007 Abstract We study the effect of pre-primary education on children's subsequent school outcomes by exploiting a unique feature of the Uruguayan household survey (ECH) that collects retrospective information on preschool attendance in the context of a rapid expansion in the supply of pre-primary places. Using a within household estimator, we find small gains from preschool attendance at early ages that get magnified as children grow up. By age 15, treated children have accumulated 0.8 extra years of education and are 27 percentage points more likely to be in school compared to their untreated siblings. Instrumental variables estimates that attempt to control for non random selection of siblings into preschool lead to similar results. Pre-primary education appears as a successful and cost-effective policy to prevent early grade failure and its long lasting consequences in low income countries. © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. JEL classifications: I2; J1 Keywords: Preschool; Pre-primary education; Primary school performance 1.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Social Inclusion in Uruguay Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized © 2020 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This work was originally published by The World Bank in English as Social Inclusion in Uruguay, in 2020. In case of any discrepancies, the original language will prevail. This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because The World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Attribution—The World Bank. 2020. Social Inclusion in Uruguay. Washington, DC: World Bank. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 IGO. Any queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; e mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]