DOCSLIB.ORG

Proclamatory Pragmatism an Investigation Into the Lutheran Logic of Law and Gospel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proclamatory Pragmatism an Investigation Into the Lutheran Logic of Law and Gospel Proclamatory Pragmatism An Investigation into the Lutheran Logic of Law and Gospel Scott Edward Yakimow Vancouver, Washington Master of Arts, University of Virginia, 2011 Master of Divinity, Concordia Seminary, 2004 Master of Arts, Luther Seminary, 1999 Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering, Valparaiso University, 1994 Christ College Scholar, Valparaiso University, 1994 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Religious Studies University of Virginia December, 2014 Abstract Contemporary American Lutheranism is experiencing a considerable number of long- term, intractable disputes, principally regarding biblical interpretation, that are resulting in an increasingly fractured denominational community. This dissertation seeks to provide the Lutheran community, and possibly others, with a set of tools that can be used to mediate such disputes regarding how Scripture should be interpreted. It does so by means of offering to Lutherans a pragmatic analysis of the logic behind the Lutheran praxis of distinguishing Law and Gospel, and it connects this praxis to the Apostle Paul’s own approach to reading Scripture. I develop this logical model, which I call “proclamatory pragmatism,” by means of an investigation of early Lutheran thought – primarily that of the Lutheran Confessions – and an analysis of Paul’s practice of reading Scripture as witnessed to in Galatians, 1 Corinthians, and Romans. It is highly indebted to and intended to be an extension of Peter Ochs’ “scriptural pragmatism” which is itself dependent upon the pragmatism developed by Charles Sanders Peirce. My primary thesis is that competing foundationalisms are present in contemporary Lutheran theology; that both claim roots in the early Lutherans and Paul; that both misunderstand the Lutheran and Pauline project in characteristically foundationalist ways (dogmatist and relativist); that the early Lutherans and Paul were primarily engaged in a reparative project; that charting the logic of both the early Lutherans’ and Paul’s reparative projects via pragmatic categories offers a normative logical structure for contemporary Lutherans that they might use to mediate the problem of competing foundationalisms; and that the model of “proclamatory pragmatism” is effective in doing so. I offer this logical model to Lutherans (and perhaps other Pauline Christians, ii though its extent is unknown) as a way forward out of the impasse which currently plagues so many theological discussions. © Scott Yakimow, 2014 Table of Contents Abstract ..................................................................................................................................i Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................1 Introductory Matters .............................................................................................................4 Peirce, Paul and Lutheranism: Boon Companions ................................................................ 11 Charting Contemporary Lutheran Divisions......................................................................... 17 Plan of Attack ................................................................................................................... 27 Chapter One: Introduction to Scriptural Pragmatism ............................................................. 33 Basic Definitions ............................................................................................................... 42 Three Tendencies of Reasoning.......................................................................................... 62 A Logic of Vagueness ......................................................................................................... 80 Chapter Two: Proclamatory Pragmatism – Paul’s Virtuous Scriptural Practice ........................ 93 Paul as Handyman: Reparative Logic as Endemic to Paul’s Letters ........................................ 96 Paul’s Virtuous Scriptural Practice .................................................................................... 102 Paul’s Gospel .................................................................................................................. 108 The Gospel and Paul’s Scriptural Reading Tendencies ........................................................ 123 Faith, Hope and Love: Hosting a Telic Dialog ..................................................................... 144 Specific Instances of Paul’s Scriptural Practice: Food Sacrificed to Idols .............................. 153 Romans ...................................................................................................................... 153 First Corinthians .......................................................................................................... 162 Chapter Three: Law and Gospel – Proclamatory Pragmatism in the Lutheran Tradition ........ 171 The Internalist Pole – Lutheran Spirituality as a Habitus θεόσδοτος ................................... 176 The Objectivist Pole – Doctrine as Rules for Proclamation ................................................. 204 Doctrine’s Role as Negative Rules of Christian Discourse ................................................ 217 A Reparative Rationality – Proclamatory Pragmatism as Law & Gospel ............................... 235 Conclusion: Proclamatory Pragmatism and a Lutheran Morphologie ................................... 260 A Social Statement on Human Sexuality: Gift and Trust ..................................................... 264 A Claimed Pauline Doctrine: “The Order of Creation” ........................................................ 284 Appendix A – C.F.W. Walther’s Theses on Distinguishing Law and Gospel ............................ 299 Bibliography ...................................................................................................................... 303 1 Abbreviations AC The Augsburg Confession ALC American Lutheran Church Ap The Apology to the Augsburg Confession AR Ochs, Peter. Another Reformation: Postliberal Christianity and the Jews. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2011. BDAG Arndt, William, Frederick W. Danker, and Walter Bauer. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000. BoC Book of Concord CD Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics. 14 vols. Translated by G.W. Bromily. Edited by G.W. Bromily and T.F. Torrance. New York: T&T Clark International, A Continuum Imprint, 2004. Conf Augustine. Confessions. Oxford World Classics. Translated by Henry Chadwick. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. CP Peirce, Charles. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. 8 volumes. Edited by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1960. CWA Churchwide Assembly of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America DeTrin Augustine. The Trinity: De Trinitate. The Works of St. Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century. Translated by Edmund Hill and edited by John E. Rotelle. Hyde Park, NY: New City Press, 1991. ELCA Evangelical Lutheran Church in America Ep The Epitome to the Formula of Concord EP Peirce, Charles. The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Volume 1 (1867-1893) and Volume 2 (1893-1913). Edited by Nathan Houser, Christian Kloesel, and the Peirce Project. © Scott Yakimow, 2014 2 Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1992 and 1998. FC The Formula of Concord HA The Humble Argument OCD Augustine. On Christian Doctrine. Trans. D.W. Robertson, Jr. Upper Saddles River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1958. K/W Kolb, Robert and Timothy J. Wengert, eds. The Book of Concord: The Confessions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2000. L&G Law and Gospel LC Luther’s Large Catechism LCA Lutheran Church in America LCMS The Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod LSJ Liddell, Henry George et al. A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996. LW Luther, Martin. Luther’s Works, Vols. 1-55. Eds. Jaroslav Pelikan, Hilton C. Oswald, and Helmut T. Lehmann. Saint Louis and Philadelphia: Concordia Publishing House and Fortress Press, 1958-1976. NA The Neglected Argument PPLS Ochs, Peter. Peirce, Pragmatism and the Logic of Scripture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998. PTS Short, Thomas L. Peirce’s Theory of Signs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. PW Ochs, Peter. “Philosophic Warrants for Scriptural Reasoning.” Modern Theology 22, no. 3 (2006): 465-482. RR Ochs, Peter. “Reparative Reasoning: From Peirce’s Pragmatism to Augustine’s Scriptural Semiotic.” Modern Theology 25, no. 2 (2009): 187-215. SA The Smalcald Articles SC Luther’s Small Catechism SD The Solid Declaration to the Formula of Concord © Scott Yakimow, 2014 3 TCT Commission on Theology and Church Relations. “The Creator’s Tapestry: Scriptural Perspectives and Ecclesial Practice.” St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2009. Trigl. Bente, F., ed. Triglot Concordia: The Symbolical Books of the Ev. Lutheran Church (German-Latin- English). St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921. WIC Commission on Theology and Church Relations. “Women in the Church: Scriptural Principles and Ecclesial Practice.” St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1985. © Scott Yakimow, 2014 4 Introductory Matters This dissertation grew from long consideration of a thought that found voice for me in a 2007 paper
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Early Pyrrhonism As a Sect of Buddhism? a Case Study in the Methodology of Comparative Philosophy
    Comparative Philosophy Volume 9, No. 2 (2018): 1-40 Open Access / ISSN 2151-6014 www.comparativephilosophy.org EARLY PYRRHONISM AS A SECT OF BUDDHISM? A CASE STUDY IN THE METHODOLOGY OF COMPARATIVE PHILOSOPHY MONTE RANSOME JOHNSON & BRETT SHULTS ABSTRACT: We offer a sceptical examination of a thesis recently advanced in a monograph published by Princeton University Press entitled Greek Buddha: Pyrrho’s Encounter with Early Buddhism in Central Asia. In this dense and probing work, Christopher I. Beckwith, a professor of Central Eurasian studies at Indiana University, Bloomington, argues that Pyrrho of Elis adopted a form of early Buddhism during his years in Bactria and Gandhāra, and that early Pyrrhonism must be understood as a sect of early Buddhism. In making his case Beckwith claims that virtually all scholars of Greek, Indian, and Chinese philosophy have been operating under flawed assumptions and with flawed methodologies, and so have failed to notice obvious and undeniable correspondences between the philosophical views of the Buddha and of Pyrrho. In this study we take Beckwith’s proposal and challenge seriously, and we examine his textual basis and techniques of translation, his methods of examining passages, his construal of problems and his reconstruction of arguments. We find that his presuppositions are contentious and doubtful, his own methods are extremely flawed, and that he draws unreasonable conclusions. Although the result of our study is almost entirely negative, we think it illustrates some important general points about the methodology of comparative philosophy. Keywords: adiaphora, anātman, anattā, ataraxia, Buddha, Buddhism, Democritus, Pāli, Pyrrho, Pyrrhonism, Scepticism, trilakṣaṇa 1. INTRODUCTION One of the most ambitious recent works devoted to comparative philosophy is Christopher Beckwith’s monograph Greek Buddha: Pyrrho’s Encounter with Early Buddhism in Central Asia (2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Philip Melanchthon and the Historical Luther by Ralph Keen 7 2 Philip Melanchthon’S History of the Life and Acts of Dr Martin Luther Translated by Thomas D
    VANDIVER.cvr 29/9/03 11:44 am Page 1 HIS VOLUME brings By placing accurate new translations of these two ‘lives of Luther’ side by side, Vandiver together two important Luther’s T and her colleagues have allowed two very contemporary accounts of different perceptions of the significance of via free access the life of Martin Luther in a Luther to compete head to head. The result is as entertaining as it is informative, and a Luther’s confrontation that had been postponed for more than four powerful reminder of the need to ensure that secondary works about the Reformation are hundred and fifty years. The first never displaced by the primary sources. of these accounts was written imes iterary upplement after Luther’s death, when it was rumoured that demons had seized lives the Reformer on his deathbed and dragged him off to Hell. In response to these rumours, Luther’s friend and colleague, Downloaded from manchesterhive.com at 09/25/2021 06:33:04PM Philip Melanchthon wrote and Elizabeth Vandiver, Ralph Keen, and Thomas D. Frazel - 9781526120649 published a brief encomium of the Reformer in . A completely new translation of this text appears in this book. It was in response to Melanchthon’s work that Johannes Cochlaeus completed and published his own monumental life of Luther in , which is translated and made available in English for the first time in this volume. After witnessing Luther’s declaration before Charles V at the Diet of Worms, Cochlaeus had sought out Luther and debated with him. However, the confrontation left him convinced that Luther was an impious and —Bust of Luther, Lutherhaus, Wittenberg.
    [Show full text]
  • Adiaphora, Luther and the Material Culture of Worship Andrew Spicer
    Adiaphora, Luther and the Material Culture of Worship Andrew Spicer During the seventeenth and eighteenth century, English merchants and travellers to Germany and the Baltic were surprised by the pre-Reformation furnishings that remained in the Lutheran churches they visited, particularly commenting on the altarpieces, organs and statues.1 The survival of these aspects of late medieval worship has been attributed to the so-called ‘preserving power’ of Lutheranism. Significant numbers of images, ecclesiastical plate and vestments together with altarpieces remain even to this day through having been retained by Lutheran congregations.2 Recent scholarship, however, has acknowledged that this material culture has not always survived without some adaptation to accord with the needs of Lutheran worship.3 Furthermore, it has been questioned whether ‘preservation’ or ‘survival’ are the appropriate terms to refer to these items associated with pre-Reformation worship but with which the Lutheran faithful continued to engage.4 Adiaphora has become a convenient term to explain the retention of this ecclesiastical material culture, particularly in relation to religious art and images, within the Lutheran tradition.5 Adiaphora, a Greek term, had its origins in classical philosophy but had been adopted by the some of the Church Fathers. The meaning of the concept gradually evolved so that by the late middle ages, it had come to refer to things that were permitted because they had neither been divinely commanded nor prohibited, as determined by the New Testament. These were matters, which were not regarded as necessary for salvation. It was this understanding of the term that was applied by the Reformers in the early sixteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Church's One Foundation
    April 2011 Volume 38 Number 2 The Church’s One Foundation CURRENTS in Theology and Mission Currents in Theology and Mission Published by Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago in cooperation with Pacific Lutheran Theological Seminary Wartburg Theological Seminary Editors: Kathleen D. Billman, Kurt K. Hendel, Mark N. Swanson Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Associate Editor: Craig L. Nessan Wartburg Theological Seminary (563-589-0207) [email protected] Assistant Editor: Ann Rezny [email protected] Copy Editor: Connie Sletto Editor of Preaching Helps: Craig A. Satterlee Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago [email protected] Editors of Book Reviews: Ralph W. Klein (Old Testament) Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago (773-256-0773) [email protected] Edgar M. Krentz (New Testament) Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago (773-256-0752) [email protected] Craig L. Nessan (history, theology, and ethics) Wartburg Theological Seminary (563-589-0207) [email protected] Circulation Office: 773-256-0751 [email protected] Editorial Board: Michael Aune (PLTS), James Erdman (WTS), Robert Kugler (PLTS), Jensen Seyenkulo (LSTC), Kristine Stache (WTS), Vítor Westhelle (LSTC). CURRENTS IN THEOLOGY AND MISSION (ISSN: 0098-2113) is published bimonthly (every other month), February, April, June, August, October, December. Annual subscription rate: $24.00 in the U.S.A., $28.00 elsewhere. Two-year rate: $44.00 in the U.S.A., $52.00 elsewhere. Three-year rate: $60.00 in the U.S.A., $72.00 elsewhere. Many back issues are available for $5.00, postage included. Published by Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago, a nonprofit organization, 1100 East 55th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60615, to which all business correspondence is to be addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Limits Upon Adiaphoristic Freedom: Luther and Melanchthon1 Bernard J
    THE LIMITS UPON ADIAPHORISTIC FREEDOM: LUTHER AND MELANCHTHON1 BERNARD J. VERKAMP Vincennes University, Indiana HEN LUTHER and his principal spokesman, Philip Melanchthon, Wlaunched their attack against the many ecclesiastical laws and regulations which had cropped up over the centuries, it was not so much a matter of attacking the traditions in themselves as it was an attempt to restore the doctrine of solafideism, which in their opinion the traditions had severely jeopardized. Once that doctrine was fully appreciated, Luther wrote, the Christian would "easily and safely find his way through those myriad mandates and precepts of popes, bishops, monas­ teries, churches, princes, and magistrates."2 As it turned out, that way, according to both Luther and Melanchthon, was an adiaphoristic via media. But whether such a path was as "easily and safely" to be discerned as Luther thought, may be doubted; for, as a matter of fact, the adiaphoristic freedom championed by the two Wittenberg Reformers was closely circumscribed by "limits" from without and within, which, because of their subtlety and complexity, could be and not infrequently were overlooked. In what follows, it will be my intention to show exactly what those limits are. I will begin by trying to establish the outer boundaries, or, in other words, the precise locus of the adiaphorism proffered by Luther and Melanchthon. At its sixth session the Council of Trent declared: "Si quis dixerit, nihil praeceptum esse in Evangelio praeter fidem, cetera esse indifferentia, ñeque praecepta,
    [Show full text]
  • 1 INHALT Grußwort Lutherlied Familientag in Eisleben Gruppenfoto Paul Luther
    INHALT Grußwort Lutherlied Familientag in Eisleben Gruppenfoto Paul Luther - der Arzt Bibliothek Familiennachrichten Kinderseite HEFT 62 90. JAHRGANG Heft 215 seit 1926 Dezember 2015 Erscheint in zwangloser Folge Teinehmer des Familientages in Eisleben versammelten sich zum traditionellen Gruppenfoto auf den Stufen des Lutherdenkmals im Zentrum der Stadt. Liebe Lutherfamilie, Haustür offenbart mir, dass nicht nur der Sommer, es kommt mir zwar so vor, als ob ich noch gestern in sondern auch schon bald das Jahr 2015 vorüber ist. der Sonne auf der Terrasse gesessen hätte - aber ein 2015 ist ein ereignisreiches Jahr, mit zahlreichen Be- Blick auf den Kalender und das Wetter vor meiner gegnungen und Zeiten des Austausches, gewesen. 1 Nicht nur für mich persönlich, sondern auch für wie auch die Bundesrepublik, wiedervereint. Ein die Lutheriden-Vereinigung. So haben wir auf dem Verdienst unserer Ehrenvorsitzenden Irene Scholvin vergangenen Familientag in Eisleben es nicht nur und ein Grund für uns, dass wir 2019 den Familien- geschafft unseren Vorstand neu zu bilden, sondern tag in Coburg begehen wollen. durften auch das neue Ahnenbuch vorstellen. Ein Viel Arbeit liegt vor dem neuen Vorstand. Seien es langwieriger, spannender und interessanter Prozess nun Nachkommenbücher, Familienblätter, Genealo- war es, der allen daran beteiligten viel Zeit abfor- gie, Bibliothek, Wahrnehmung von Einladungen zu derte. Veranstaltungen oder Arbeit an den Familientreffen. Auch wenn noch nicht alles perfekt daran ist, so wie Langweilig wird es uns zukünftig sicherlich nicht es einige Mitglieder in den vergangenen Wochen werden, das haben wir auf unserer ersten gemein- anmerkten, so ist damit meines Erachtens dennoch samen Sitzung in Berlin bei Franziska Kühnemann ein Meilenstein geschaffen, auf den wir als Vereini- bereits festgestellt.
    [Show full text]
  • THS 571 Theology of the Believers Church Tradition
    1 THS 571 Theology of the Believers Church Tradition Class notes for Fall, 2010 – Spring, 2011 Compiled and arranged by Dr. Archie J. Spencer © Do not Copy without permission These notes are provided as a favor to students to help them follow the lectures and engage in discussion. They are a work in progress still needing some editing and correction. All suggestions for improvement and lists of errata welcomed. Hope you find them helpful nevertheless. They are required reading for the course. 2 THS 571 Theology of the Believers Church Tradition Session I Toward a Working Definition of the Believers Church Tradition Introductory Comments a) What do we mean by Believers Church Tradition - When I was first informed that I would be teaching a course called “Believers Church Theology” I was initially amused at the strange title. After some consideration, realizing that I myself stood in a “Believers Church Tradition” of sorts, I wondered what such a course would and should look like. You are probably wondering as well. What follows is an extended definition that draws on the history of theology, systematic theology and applied ecclesiology, which can be found, in various ways and shapes in the traditions represented here at ACTS. - Such a course, however, will always be taught from the differing perspectives within the ACTS consortium, and, while I will do my level best to be comprehensive across these traditions, it is a given that my perspective will often reflect the Baptist tradition in which I now stand. I make no apologies for this, but do wish to encourage the class to engage in dialogue with myself and other colleagues, from their own perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Kant's Doctrine of Religion As Political Philosophy
    Kant's Doctrine of Religion as Political Philosophy Author: Phillip David Wodzinski Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/987 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2009 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Department of Political Science KANT’S DOCTRINE OF RELIGION AS POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY a dissertation by PHILLIP WODZINSKI submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2009 © copyright by PHILLIP DAVID WODZINSKI 2009 ABSTRACT Kant’s Doctrine of Religion as Political Philosophy Phillip Wodzinski Advisor: Susan Shell, Ph.D. Through a close reading of Immanuel Kant’s late book, Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, the dissertation clarifies the political element in Kant’s doctrine of religion and so contributes to a wider conception of his political philosophy. Kant’s political philosophy of religion, in addition to extending and further animating his moral doctrine, interprets religion in such a way as to give the Christian faith a moral grounding that will make possible, and even be an agent of, the improvement of social and political life. The dissertation emphasizes the wholeness and structure of Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason as a book, for the teaching of the book is not exhausted by the articulation of its doctrine but also includes both the fact and the manner of its expression: the reader learns most fully from Kant by giving attention to the structure and tone of the book as well as to its stated content and argumentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Apologetic Resources
    APOLOGETIC RESOURCES A Young Earth ministry perspective, namely contrasting Scripture to true science now and during the ages. By Dr. Jim Pagels [email protected] 9/2016 Editor Dr. John Fricke, Emeritus Professor of Biology, Concordia University, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Copyright This book is offered as an educational resource on a no cost basis. Contents are not to be reproduced for the purpose of sale. Note that all Scriptural passages are taken from the English Standard Version. 1 I HAVE NO GREATER JOY THAN TO HEAR THAT MY CHILDREN WALK IN THE TRUTH III JOHN 1:4 Forward - Although there is much young Earth information available from commercial sources and on the internet, it was the impression of this writer that no resource that deals with basic topical issues correlating the young Earth philosophy and science exists for professional church workers. To this end, Apologetic Resources is being offered. Intended Audience – The intended audience of this reference material is primarily use by professional church workers, i.e., teachers, pastors, youth workers, etc., namely those who choose to uphold the literal interpretation of Genesis and the inerrancy of Holy Scripture. The focus in this regard is Young Earth Creationism and the catastrophic nature of the global Genesis Flood keeping in mind that Genesis 1-11 is foundational to most of the significant doctrines of Holy Scripture. Of course, laymen may well also find this reference a valuable resource. There is obviously a realistic interplay between Scripture, apologetics and true science. The goal of this document is to provide clarity to this interaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Canisius and the Protestants a Model of Ecumenical Dialogue?
    journal of jesuit studies 1 (2014) 373-399 brill.com/jjs Peter Canisius and the Protestants A Model of Ecumenical Dialogue? Hilmar M. Pabel Department of History, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada [email protected] Abstract Some modern interpreters have incorrectly suggested that Peter Canisius was an ecumenist before his time. Their insistence on his extraordinary kindness towards Protestants does not stand the test of the scrutiny of the relevant sources. An analysis of Canisius’s advice on how Jesuits should deal with “heretics” in Germany, of his catechisms, and of his polemical works reveals a typical Catholic controversialist of the Reformation era. Canisius was disposed to display hostility, more than good will, to Protestants. Keywords Peter Canisius – Protestants – Reformation – apologetics Introduction: The Celebration of a Saint Peter Canisius’s path to canonization was a long one. He died in 1597. The for- mal ecclesiastical process to declare him a saint began in 1625, but his beatifica- tion, solemnly pronounced by Pope Pius IX, had to wait until 1864.1 In Militantis ecclesiae (1897), Pope Leo XIII marked the 300th anniversary of Canisius’s death by hailing him as “the second apostle of Germany.” St. Boniface, the eighth- century Anglo-Saxon missionary, was the first. Pius XI not only canonized Canisius in 1925; he also declared him a doctor of the universal church.2 This 1 Forian Rieß, Der selige Petrus Canisius aus der Gesellschaft Jesu (Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 1865), 552, 554. 2 Otto Braunsberger, “Sanctus Petrus Canisius Doctor Ecclesiae,” Gregorianum 6 (1925): 338. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2014 | doi 10.1163/22141332-00103002Downloaded from Brill.com09/26/2021 04:37:36AM via free access <UN> 374 Pabel was a rare distinction, as Yves de la Brière reported two weeks later in the Jesuit journal Études.
    [Show full text]
  • Rev. Dr. Norma Cook Everist Distinguished Professor of Church and Ministry Emerita Wartburg Theological Seminary [email protected] 320 1St St
    Rev. Dr. Norma Cook Everist Distinguished Professor of Church and Ministry emerita Wartburg Theological Seminary [email protected] 320 1st St. NE Apt. 207 Mason City, Iowa, 50401 www.normacookeverist.com Degrees: Ph.D. 1988, Denver University and the Iliff School of Theology Dissertation: “The Paradox of Pluralism: A Sociological, Ethical, and Ecclesiological Perspective of the Church’s Vocation in the Public World” M.Div. 1976, Yale Divinity School, New Haven, Connecticut M.A.R. 1964, Concordia Theological Seminary, Saint Louis, Missouri B.A. 1960, Valparaiso University, Valparaiso, Indiana; (with Honors) Theology Major, Education Minor A.A. 1958, North Iowa Area Community College, Mason City, IA Ministry: 2017- Distinguished Professor of Church and Ministry, emerita, Wartburg Seminary 2009-17 Senior Distinguished Professor of Church and Ministry, Wartburg Seminary 1990-09 Professor of Church and Ministry, Wartburg Seminary Primary Areas: Educational Ministry, Church Administration 1984-90 Associate Professor in the Ministry Division, Wartburg Seminary 1979-84 Assistant Professor in the Ministry Division, Wartburg Seminary 1977-79 Parish Associate, Hamden Plains United Methodist Church, Hamden, Connecticut 1976-79 Lecturer in Practical Theology, Yale Divinity School, Word and Sacrament Ministry with Lutheran Students 1976-77 Parish Associate, Bethesda Lutheran, New Haven, Connecticut 1974-76 Comparative Religion Instructor, Hamden Hall Country Day School, Hamden, Connecticut 1971-73 A Conference Program Coordinator, Ecumenical Continuing Education Center at Yale, New Haven, Connecticut 1970-76 Inner City Ministry, New Haven, Connecticut 1966-70 Inner City Ministry, Detroit, Michigan 1960-64 Parish Deaconess, Ascension Lutheran Church, Saint Louis, Missouri Guest Professor: 2018- North Iowa Area Community College, Life Long Learning Institute Lecturer 2011 Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia, Visiting Professor 2010 Johannelund Seminary, Uppsala, Sweden, Guest Lecturer 2004-7 University of Dubuque Theological Seminary, D.Min.
    [Show full text]
  • HEFT 48 83. JAHRGANG Juni 2008 (Heft 201 Seit 1926) Erscheint in Zwangloser Folge!
    Vorsitzende: Henriette Rossner-Sauerbier, 06712 Zeitz, Stephansstrasse 18 (Te.: 03441/213771 Fax: 03441/539676) e-Mail: [email protected] stv. Vorsitzender: Martin Eichler, 81675 München, Lucile-Grahn-Strasse 46 (Tel.: 089/41919998 Fax: 089/41768960) e-Mail: [email protected] Schriftführer: Heinrich Streffer, 85646 Anzing, Lessingstrasse 46 (Tel.: 08121/48475 Fax: 08121/417618) e-Mail: [email protected] Schatzmeister: Jörg Illing, 55268 Nieder-Olm, Bahnhofstrasse 16 (Tel.: 06136/924217 Fax: 06136/924218) e-Mail: [email protected] Beisitzer: Wolfgang Liebehenschel, 14164 Berlin, Machnower Strasse 30 (Tel./Fax: 030/8135892 ) e-Mail: [email protected] Beisitzer: Christian Priesmeier, 31789 Hameln, Breslauer Strasse 23 (Tel.: 05151/52617 Fax: 05151/52621) e-Mail: [email protected] Beisitzer: Hans Peter Werner, 79650 Schopfheim, Im Dellacker 3 (Tel.: 07622/668781 Fax: 07622/668782) e-Mail: [email protected] Genealogie: Friedel Damm, 14532 Stahnsdorf, Asternweg 7 (Tel.: 03329/610248) e-Mail: [email protected] Ehrenvorsitzende: Irene Scholvin, 31139 Hildesheim, Chr.Hackethal-Strasse 49 (Tel.: 05121/46159) Unsere Internet-Adresse: www.lutheriden.de Bankverbindung: Commerzbank Teltow, Konto 570 8995 (BLZ 160 400 00) HEFT 48 83. JAHRGANG Juni 2008 (Heft 201 seit 1926) Erscheint in zwangloser Folge! Liebe Lutherverwandte, „in pincipio erat verbum“ – Am Anfang stand „In principio erat verbum et verbum erat apud das Wort - ist der Satz der auf meiner Deum et verbum erat Deus“ Visitenkarte als Wahlspruch steht. Das Latein, Griechisch und Hebräisch dies sind die Johannesevangelium beginnt mit diesem Satz Sprachen der Bibel. Die Sprachen in der die und soll dabei verdeutlichen dass alles, wirklich Bibel geschrieben war und ist.
    [Show full text]