DOCSLIB.ORG

Blockchain-Based Ticketing Marius Lillevik Ole Bjørngran Andrine Celineflatby

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Blockchain-Based Ticketing Marius Lillevik Ole Bjørngran Andrine Celineflatby Andrine Celine Flatby Ole Bjørn Gran Marius Lillevik Blockchain-based Ticketing Bachelor’s project in Bachelor of Science in Engineering - Computer Science Supervisor: Hao Wang Bachelor’s project Bachelor’s May 2019 NTNU Engineering Department of Computer Science Department of Computer Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Technology of Information Faculty Norwegian University of Science and Technology of Science University Norwegian Andrine Celine Flatby Ole Bjørn Gran Marius Lillevik Blockchain-based Ticketing Bachelor’s project in Bachelor of Science in Engineering - Computer Science Supervisor: Hao Wang May 2019 Norwegian University of Science and Technology Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering Department of Computer Science Blockchain-based Ticketing Sammendrag av Bacheloroppgaven Tittel: Billettsystem på Blockchain Dato: May 19, 2019 Deltakere: Andrine Celine Flatby Ole Bjørn Gran Marius Lillevik Veiledere: Hao Wang Oppdragsgiver: Innit AS Kontaktperson: Hao Wang, [email protected], +47 70 16 15 34 Nøkkelord: Blockchain, Billettsystem, Ethereum, Hyperledger Fabric, Solidity, JavaScript Antall sider: 43 Antall vedlegg: 6 Tilgjengelighet: Åpen Sammendrag: Innit AS har flere lisensierte applikasjoner for billettsalg for ishockey lag i den norske hockey ligaen. De forbedrer kontinuerlig sine billettsystemer, og de vil se om de kan forbedre sin eksisterende løsning ved hjelp av blockchain- teknologi. Blockchain er en relativt ny teknologi med mange bruksområder. Det gjør det mulig for medlemmer av et nettverk å dele informasjon sikkert og har forbedret loggegenskaper sammenlignet med tradis- jonelle databaser. Denne oppgaven undersøker bruken av blockchain i billett systemer. Først presenteres en bakgrunnsstudie av blockchain-teknologien og dens utviklingsplattformer. Deretter en undersøkelse av dagens marked og eksis- terende løsninger bygget på blockchain. Basert på disse funnene ble en prototype av et billettsystem utviklet som et "proof of concept" for å fremheve mulighetene for disse systemene. i Blockchain-based Ticketing Summary of Graduate Project Title: Blockchain-based Ticketing Date: May 19, 2019 Authors: Andrine Celine Flatby Ole Bjørn Gran Marius Lillevik Supervisor: Hao Wang Employer: Innit AS Contact Person: Hao Wang, [email protected], +47 70 16 15 34 Keywords: Blockchain, Ticket systems, Ethereum, Hyperledger Fab- ric, Solidity, JavaScript Pages: 43 Attachments: 6 Availability: Open Abstract: Innit AS has multiple licensed applications for ticket sales for ice hockey teams in the Norwegian hockey league. They are continuously improving their ticketing systems, and they want to see if they could improve their existing solution by using blockchain technology. Blockchain is a relatively new technology with a wide variety of applications. It allows members of a network to share information securely and has improved logging capabilities compared to traditional databases. This thesis investigates the applications of blockchain in ticketing systems. First, a background study of the blockchain technology and its development platforms are presented. Then an investigation into the current market and the existing solutions using blockchain. Based on these findings, a prototype ticketing system was developed as a proof-of-concept to showcase the feasibility of these systems. ii Blockchain-based Ticketing Preface We want to thank Øyvind Tangen and Olafur Trollebø at Innit for the interesting bachelor thesis and for their continuous support during this period. We also want to thank our supervisor Hao Wang for his input on the report; he helped structure and proofread our report from day one. We also want to thank Mariusz Nowostawski for his help during the development of our prototype. He helped us with most of the questions we had about developing the prototype on a blockchain. iii Blockchain-based Ticketing Contents Preface .......................................... iii Contents ......................................... iv List of Figures ...................................... vii List of Tables ....................................... viii Listings .......................................... ix Abbreviations ...................................... x 1 Introduction ..................................... 1 1.1 Background...................................1 1.2 Problem area..................................1 1.3 Project description...............................2 1.4 Delimitations..................................2 1.5 Target audience.................................2 1.6 Academic background.............................2 1.7 Project organization..............................3 1.8 Document structure..............................3 2 Blockchain ...................................... 4 2.1 What is blockchain?..............................4 2.1.1 Decentralization............................5 2.1.2 Different types.............................5 2.1.3 Frameworks and platforms......................6 2.2 How it works..................................6 2.2.1 Distributed ledger...........................7 2.2.2 Smart contract.............................7 2.2.3 Consensus protocol vs algorithms...................8 2.3 Why blockchain in ticketing system?.....................8 2.3.1 Benefits.................................8 2.3.2 Challenges...............................9 3 Existing services ................................... 10 3.1 Services..................................... 10 3.1.1 Evopass................................. 10 3.1.2 Blocktix................................. 10 3.1.3 GUTS.................................. 11 3.2 Protocols.................................... 11 3.2.1 Aventus................................. 11 3.2.2 GET................................... 11 iv Blockchain-based Ticketing 3.3 Their solutions................................. 12 3.3.1 Platforms................................ 12 3.3.2 Smart tickets.............................. 12 3.3.3 Security................................. 12 3.4 Market challenges............................... 12 4 Platforms and Protocols .............................. 15 4.1 Ethereum vs Hyperledger Fabric........................ 15 4.1.1 Ethereum................................ 15 4.1.2 Hyperledger............................... 16 4.1.3 Comparing Ethereum and Hyperledger Fabric............ 17 4.2 Comparing GET and Ethereum........................ 18 4.3 Choice of platform............................... 19 5 Design ......................................... 20 5.1 Requirements.................................. 20 5.2 Technical Design................................ 20 5.2.1 Use case model............................. 21 5.2.2 System structure............................ 24 5.2.3 GUI................................... 25 6 Implementation ................................... 26 6.1 Development Environment........................... 26 6.1.1 Software................................ 26 6.1.2 Skyhigh server............................. 26 6.2 Development.................................. 26 6.3 Finished Product................................ 31 6.3.1 Web interface.............................. 31 6.3.2 Testing.................................. 34 7 Discussion ...................................... 36 7.1 Discussion.................................... 36 7.2 Group Evaluation................................ 37 7.2.1 Initially................................. 37 7.2.2 Distribution of work.......................... 37 8 Conclusion ...................................... 38 8.1 Future work................................... 38 8.2 Conclusion................................... 38 Bibliography ....................................... 39 A Definitions ...................................... 44 B Source Code ..................................... 45 C Installation guide .................................. 57 D Meeting Logs ..................................... 63 E Project Plan ..................................... 65 v Blockchain-based Ticketing F Project Agreement .................................. 76 vi Blockchain-based Ticketing List of Figures 1 Example of how blockchain works......................6 2 Use Case Diagram............................... 21 3 Shows the system structure and dependencies................ 24 4 The proposed design for the web interface.................. 25 5 Page to event organizer............................ 31 6 Page to user................................... 32 7 Page to game.................................. 32 8 Page to ticket.................................. 33 9 Page to log................................... 34 vii Blockchain-based Ticketing List of Tables 1 Comparing Ethereum and Hyperleger Fabric................. 17 2 Comparing GET and Ethereum........................ 18 viii Blockchain-based Ticketing Listings 6.1 global arrays.................................. 27 6.2 createEventOrganizer function........................ 28 6.3 createGame function.............................. 28 6.4 createTicket function.............................. 29 6.5 buy function................................... 29 6.6 validateTicket function............................. 30 ix Blockchain-based Ticketing Abbreviations P2P, peer-to-peer DLT, distributed ledger technology Geth, Go-Ethereum PoW, Proof of Work PoS, Proof of Stake PBFT, Practical Byzantine Faul Tolerance VM, Virtual Machine EVM, Ethereum Virtual Machine Dapp, Decentralized application DAO, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations MVP, Minimum Viable Product x Blockchain-based Ticketing 1 Introduction
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prospectus, Which Is in the Swedish-Language, and Which Was Approved by the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority on 17 May 2019
    NB: This English-language document is an unofficial translation of XBT Provider AB's base prospectus, which is in the Swedish-language, and which was approved by the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority on 17 May 2019. In the case of any discrepancies between the base prospectus and this English translation, the Swedish-language base prospectus shall prevail. BASE PROSPECTUS Dated 17 May 2019 for the issuance of BITCOIN TRACKER CERTIFICATES, BITCOIN CASH TRACKER CERTIFICATES, ETHEREUM TRACKER CERTIFICATES, ETHEREUM CLASSIC TRACKER CERTIFICATES, LITECOIN TRACKER CERTIFICATES, XRP TRACKER CERTIFICATES, NEO TRACKER CERTIFICATES & BASKET CERTIFICATES under the Issuance programme of XBT Provider AB (publ) (a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Sweden) The Certificates are guaranteed by CoinShares (Jersey) Limited ______________________________________ IMPORTANT INFORMATION This base prospectus (the "Base Prospectus") contains information relating to Certificates (as defined below) to be issued under the programme (the "Programme"). Under the Base Prospectus, XBT Provider AB (publ) (the "Issuer" or "XBT Provider") may, from time to time, issue Certificates and apply for such Certificates to be admitted to trading on one or more regulated markets or multilateral trading facilities ("MTF’s") in Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom or, subject to completion of relevant notification measures, any other Member State within the European Economic Area ("EEA"). The correct performance of the Issuer's payment obligations regarding the Certificates under the Programme are guaranteed by CoinShares (Jersey) Limited (the "Guarantor"). The Certificates are not principal-protected and do not bear interest. Consequently, the value of, and any amounts payable under, the Certificates will be strongly influenced by the performance of the Tracked Digital Currencies (as defined herein) and, unless the certificates are denominated in USD, the USD-SEK exchange rate or, as the case may be, the USD-EUR exchange rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryptocurrencies: Overcoming Barriers to Trust and Adoption
    CRYPTOCURRENCIES: OVERCOMING BARRIERS TO TRUST AND ADOPTION Dr Zeynep Gurguc and Prof William Knottenbelt, Imperial College London Contents 01Foreword 02 02Executive summary 04 03Introduction 06 04Key blockchain concepts 07 05Evolution of money 11 06Challenges and solutions 17 07Conclusions and conjectures 21 08Glossary of terms 23 09Acknowledgements 24 01 01Foreword The Internet started out with the simple use case of email globally accepted form of money - we should also be (digital communications) and the aim to decentralise asking when buying the weekly shop with them will be communications. The Blockchain, in a similar vein, commonplace. started out to decentralise ‘value’. The first use case being cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (digital money). As our findings make clear, the notion that cryptocurrencies have to fit in with old-world financial As the Internet scaled so did the use cases. The Internet models is flawed. Money has always evolved. Its uses facilitated e-commerce, social networks, gaming and so and social status have changed and will keep changing. on. In the same way, the Blockchain has increased its use Why should we measure cryptocurrencies with the same cases, away from much talked about cryptocurrencies yardstick used for traditional payment and currency like Bitcoin and Litecoin to other cryptoassets, such as systems? Would you really judge email with the same cryptocommodities like Ethereum and cryptotokens like criteria as the written letter? Steem. New use cases will continue to emerge and other segments such as cryptosecurities will start to appear. The report supports our conviction that cryptocurrencies will gain global mainstream adoption within the next decade. Just as communication underpins almost all applications across the Internet, value will do the same on the If the Internet changed the way we communicate, Blockchain.
    [Show full text]
  • Difference Between Coin Token and Protocol
    Difference Between Coin Token And Protocol campanileBjorne patch-up and attack hydrostatically his sortes while so peevishly! hyperbolic Ordovician Bo prod buzzinglyand unwifely or tows Tremaine derisively. never Salpiform propine hisAngus deerstalker! nomadizes some Furthermore Lumens coins are inflationary while XRPs are deflationary meaning. Coinbase added COMP to our supported assets for Coinbase and Coinbase Pro. Another difference between different protocols and differences between parties. Facilitate collaboration and quickly gained strong background in. Difference Between Coins and Tokens by Spiking Editor. For example, DAI and USDC are both pegged to the US dollar. The tokens and between the laws and represents a system can host a stable cryptocurrencies and whether the steem went up? To appoint my band well, slowly research existing malware so bizarre I can inform my customers how serious or how harmful these viruses could be. Why air New Tokens Are Ethereum ICOs skalex. Offers based on different coins, protocol tokens in a difference between placement of mining works when attempting to develop it would farm, ripple refers to. Security tokens are created through a type my initial coin offering ICO sometimes referred to skirt a security token offering STO to plug it whether other types of. This problem describes the dilemma that a critical number of sellers or vendors is necessary to be of cover to customers as a platform. Sec regulation s options and each has included on leveraged crypto businesses that difference between coin token and protocol tokens are similar to. Bitcoin and coins differ from the difference. But whenever you growing like other, you well go cheer the nearest machine and reward them.
    [Show full text]
  • Crypto / Blockchain Market
    Financial Services / Infrastructure Lending Merchant Payment Gateways Fiat-backed Stablecoins Tokenized Real-world Assets Compound Maker Celsius BitPay CoinPayments CoinGate Circle (USDC) Gemini Dollar Tether Power Ledger BananaCoin Water Ledger Trading Marble Dharma Nexo Savvy Blockonomics BTCPayServer TrueUSD Digix Paxos Grid Singularity GRID+ Harbor EthLend WeTrust MicroMoney NetCents Opennode Reserve Stably Stasis Slice Brickblock Meridio Centralized Exchanges Non-custodial Exchanges / Token Swaps Market Makers / Tools BloqBoard Colendi nuo Carbon Mattereum Figure Homium Alameda DDEX OASIS Dex Loopring Galois Hummingbot Derivatives Coinbase Bitstamp itBit Research Alchemy SALT ripio Securrency tZERO Securitize MARKET bitFlyer Huobi Binance Kyber Bancor 0x Wyre Bakkt dYdX Crypto-backed Stablecoins Cred Protocol New Alchemy Abacus BitBox Bittrex OKex Binance DEX AirSwap EtherDelta LedgerX VariabL CME Maker DAI Celo AUGMINT (LINE) OTC Trading CoinSuper ShapeShift Bitfinex ForkDelta Totle Paradex Fundraising bZx UMA DAXIA xDAI bitUSD StableUnit Insurance Galaxy Cumberland Gemini Digital Gemini UPBit BitMEX Radar Relay Uniswap SparkSwap Swarm Coinlist Fairmint Synthetix Synthetix Ampleforth NuBits Etherisc Nexus Mutual iXledger Genesis Coinbase OTC Circle Trade IDex Arwen Bisq Polymath Kraken Poloniex Bithumb VouchForMe DelphX Token Baskets otcxn FRNT Prediction Markets currency.com Set bskt Trade Execution Algorithmic Stablecoins Veil Augur Gnosis Open Asset Management Tagomi SeedCX ErisX Kowala Terra Guesser Bodhi stox Meter melonport
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Digest #37, 2019
    Сurrent Market state The top 20 cryptocurrencies are reporting mixed movements on the day while Bitcoin’s (BTC) price hovers over the $10,300 mark during the last week. The total capitalization of all digital assets in circulation stayed around $267B. Bitcoin price is struggling to gain momentum above the $10,400 and $10,500 resistances. Bitcoin has retreated to trade below $10,300 to date. The major cryptocurrency is down around 0.5% Ethereum, the second-largest digital asset is down around 0.7% to trade at $179 at press time, while still holding almost 3% over a 7-day period Ripple’s XRP, the third top cryptocurrency by market cap, is one of the few top-20 coins in the green today, up by about 0.5% over the last days of the week. The altcoin is trading at $0.25, still down around 0.2% over the past 7 days. Facebook’s crypto launching in H2 2020, says Libra Association chief The head of the not-for-profit driving Facebook’s Libra digital currency has said he is confident that seemingly endless regulatory difficulties can be ironed out. Bertrand Perez’s comments came on Thursday — the same day French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire warned “we cannot authorize the development of Libra on European soil.” He fears that the stablecoin puts monetary sovereignty of European Union nations at risk, with American lawmakers equally concerned that Libra could undermine the U.S. dollar. Another bone of contention lies in how the Libra Association is set to be headquartered in Switzerland.
    [Show full text]
  • Aventus Commercial Whitepaper Table of Contents
    Aventus Commercial Whitepaper Table of contents Table of contents 2 1. Introduction: what I can expect from this paper? 6 Meet the four Aventus heroes 8 Meet Sally 8 Meet Dan 8 Meet Nigel 9 Meet Lucy 10 2. Introduction to Aventus 11 What is Aventus? 12 Aventus in a nutshell 13 What are digital assets? 13 The time for the revolution of digital assets is now 14 3. Introduction to Blockchain 16 Why Blockchain? 17 What is Blockchain? 18 How does Blockchain work? 19 Blockchain is big business 33 Blockchain in Industry 33 Banking 33 Utilities 33 Agriculture 34 Healthcare 34 Government 35 Blockchain — gamechanger, or hype? 35 4. The problem 37 The existing problem with digital assets 38 A reminder: What are digital assets? 38 The value of digital assets 38 Oversight 39 Control 40 Communication 41 How digital asset industries work 43 Event ticketing 44 Loyalty 45 Finance 46 Blockchain in digital asset exchange 47 Blockchain solutions currently in use 47 Private Blockchains 48 Public Blockchains 49 5. The Aventus Solution 52 The Aventus solution to the digital asset problem 53 The Aventus Protocol 53 A Layer 2 solution 54 Zero-knowledge proofs and Sigma protocol for privacy 56 Network architecture 59 Tier 1 — Ethereum Blockchain 61 Merkle roots 62 Adjudication 64 Governance 65 Tier 2 — The Aventus Network Layer 66 Aventus Nodes 67 Proof-of-authority consensus 68 Tier 3 — The SaaS and custom implementation layer 70 Software development kits (SDKs) 71 6. Features & benefits 73 Features and benefits of the Aventus Protocol 74 Enforceable business logic around assets 74 Standardisation of digital asset ownership and redemption 75 Communication with the asset owner throughout the life of the digital asset 77 Better distribution networks 78 Fraud & secondary market control 79 Richer data sets 80 7.
    [Show full text]
  • A Thematic Report Prepared by the European Union Blockchain Observatory & Forum
    A Thematic Report Prepared By The European Union Blockchain Observatory & Forum About this report This is the first thematic report prepared by the new team leading the EU Blockchain Observatory and Forum, aiming to present the latest updates and developments within the EU blockchain ecosystem. This is the first of a series of reports that will be published addressing selected topics in accordance with the European Commission priorities. The aim is to reflect on the latest trends and developments and discuss the future of blockchain in Europe and globally. Credits This report has been produced by the EU Blockchain Observatory and Forum team. Written by: George Giaglis, Lambis Dionysopoulos, Natasha Der Avedissian, Marianna Charalambous,University of Nicosia Nikos Kostopoulos, Ioannis Vlachos, Tonia Damvakeraki, INTRASOFT International Zalan Noszek, Hlib Krasnov, Kyrylo Chykhradze, Shota Oshkhneli, Dmitry Strukov, Bitfury Iordanis Papoutsoglou, Kostas Votis, CERTH. Special thanks to Scope for the editorial review and language proofing Note While we have done our best to incorporate the comments and suggestions of our contributors where appropriate and feasible, all mistakes and omissions are the sole responsibility of the authors of this paper. Disclaimer The information and views set out in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. Page 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Aventus Lightpaper
    What is Aventus? Aventus is an open, distributed project, not a company. Various teams and projects contribute to Aventus, including Artos Systems and FanDragon. In this sense, Aventus is similar to Linux, the popular operating system. Different parties can contribute to the project and use it for their own purposes. The original Aventus mission, set out in the 2017 whitepaper before a token distribution event, was to build a protocol for Blockchain with a specific purpose — to solve problems concerning fraud, duplicitous behaviour, and touting in the ticketing industry. By August 2019, the teams had completed Aventus Classic — the purely Ethereum-based Aventus protocol that satisfied the bulk of the original whitepaper. However, because Ethereum had not solved outstanding issues, the solution could only service scale of around 100 tickets per second. Therefore, the teams working on the Aventus project had to develop their own solution to combine the strengths of public and private Blockchains without their individual weaknesses. Today, the Aventus Network is an open, decentralised protocol that revolutionises the way digital assets are issued, owned, and transferred across value chains. The Aventus Protocol derives security and independence from open, independent Blockchain networks. It is the generality of the Aventus Protocol that resulted in the growth of the potential market to include any fungible or non-fungible digital asset beyond just tickets. That is why the new Aventus Protocol opens up a market for physical goods and supply chains, financial assets, vouchers, and gift cards. As well as loyalty points, virtual goods, collectables and more. Aventus in a nutshell Ultimately, the mission of Aventus is to revolutionise the management of digital assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Overcoming Barriers to Trust and Adoption
    CRYPTOCURRENCIES: OVERCOMING BARRIERS TO TRUST AND ADOPTION Dr Zeynep Gurguc and Prof William Knottenbelt, Imperial College London Contents 01Foreword 02 02Executive summary 04 03Introduction 06 04Key blockchain concepts 07 05Evolution of money 11 06Challenges and solutions 17 07Conclusions and conjectures 21 08Glossary of terms 23 09Acknowledgements 24 01 01Foreword The Internet started out with the simple use case of email globally accepted form of money - we should also be (digital communications) and the aim to decentralise asking when buying the weekly shop with them will be communications. The Blockchain, in a similar vein, commonplace. started out to decentralise ‘value’. The first use case being cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (digital money). As our findings make clear, the notion that cryptocurrencies have to fit in with old-world financial As the Internet scaled so did the use cases. The Internet models is flawed. Money has always evolved. Its uses facilitated e-commerce, social networks, gaming and so and social status have changed and will keep changing. on. In the same way, the Blockchain has increased its use Why should we measure cryptocurrencies with the same cases, away from much talked about cryptocurrencies yardstick used for traditional payment and currency like Bitcoin and Litecoin to other cryptoassets, such as systems? Would you really judge email with the same cryptocommodities like Ethereum and cryptotokens like criteria as the written letter? Steem. New use cases will continue to emerge and other segments such as cryptosecurities will start to appear. The report supports our conviction that cryptocurrencies will gain global mainstream adoption within the next decade. Just as communication underpins almost all applications across the Internet, value will do the same on the If the Internet changed the way we communicate, Blockchain.
    [Show full text]
  • Which Cryptocurrencies Are Mostly Traded in Distressed Times?
    Journal of Risk and Financial Management Article Which Cryptocurrencies Are Mostly Traded in Distressed Times? Nikolaos A. Kyriazis * and Paraskevi Prassa Department of Economics, University of Thessaly, 28th October 78 Street, 38333 Volos, Greece * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 10 July 2019; Accepted: 14 August 2019; Published: 20 August 2019 Abstract: This paper investigates the level of liquidity of digital currencies during the very intense bearish phase in their markets. The data employed span the period from April 2018 until January 2019, which is the second phase of bearish times with almost constant decreases. The Amihud’s illiquidity ratio is employed in order to measure the liquidity of these digital assets. Findings indicate that the most popular cryptocurrencies exhibit higher levels of liquidity during stressed periods. Thereby, it is revealed that investors’ preferences for trading during highly risky times are favorable for well-known virtual currencies in the detriment of less-known ones. This enhances findings of relevant literature about strong and persistent positive or negative herding behavior of investors based on Bitcoin, Ethereum and highly-capitalized cryptocurrencies in general. Notably though, a tendency towards investing in the TrueUSD stablecoin has also emerged. Keywords: Bitcoin; cryptocurrency; liquidity JEL Classification: E44; G11; G12; G15 1. Introduction Bitcoin and other digital currencies have spurred interest for research since late 2016 due to their increasing attractiveness as an investment tool. This has brought about a proliferating bulk of high-quality relevant academic papers (inter alia: Dyhrberg 2016a, 2016b; Katsiampa 2017; Corbet et al. 2018, 2019; Beneki et al. 2019; Kyriazis 2019). Cryptocurrencies are highly innovative means of transactions that have gained increasing popularity among investors and especially speculators seeking high profits, despite risk.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.1 Blockchain
    UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE INFORMÁTICA Smart E-Tickets: Buying Authentic and Trustworthy Tickets with Blockchain Daniel Filipe Martiniano dos Santos Mestrado em Engenharia Informática Especialização em Engenharia de Software Dissertação orientada por: Prof. Doutora Maria Antónia Bacelar da Costa Lopes 2019 Acknowledgements Agradeço aos meus pais e à minha irmã por terem tido a paciência e de me terem dado o suporte depois de ter inicialmente errado a nível académico na escolha do caminho a tomar e pelas condições que me deram para te sucesso nesta etapa da minha vida. Agradeço aos meus amigos de sempre, por todos os momentos e por todo o suporte que sempre me deram ao longo da licenciatura e mestrado. Um grande agradecimento especialmente ao Marcus Dias e Miguel Espírito Santo, por todo o apoio que me deram neste mestrado. Agradeço à minha orientadora, a Professora Doutora Antónia Bacelar da Costa Lopes, por me ter ajudado ao longo deste mestrado e dos conselhos dados tanto a nível académico como para o meu futuro a nível profissional. Agradeço à Accenture pela oportunidade que me deram para explorar uma nova tecnologia e a sua aplicabilidade. Agradeço aos meus supervisores, Tiago Minchin e especialmente ao Álvaro Silva, por todo o suporte que me deram durante o tempo todo que passei na empresa. Agradeço aos meus colegas que realizaram as suas teses de mestrado na empresa, pelo bom ambiente e pelas horas de almoço cheias de boa animação. Aos meus amigos e família. Abstract The price of tickets in the secondary market is a problem for event organizers and authorized resellers because it allows for ordinary people to make an illegal profit out of these tickets.
    [Show full text]
  • Aventus Whitepaper
    Table of contents Table of contents 1 1 Problem 2 1.1 Industry Overview 2 1.2 The Current System is Broken 4 1.3 Existing Solutions 5 1.3.1 Technology 5 1.3.2 Legislation 6 1.3.3 Self-regulation 7 1.4 Conclusion 8 2 The Aventus Solution 8 2.1 Overview 8 2.2 The Aventus Ecosystem 9 2.2.1 The Ethereum Blockchain 10 2.2.2. The Aventus Protocol 11 2.2.3. The Service Layer 11 2.2.4 The Application Layer 11 2.3 Use Cases 12 2.4 Utility Token Mechanics 14 2.4.1 Purpose 14 2.3.2 Mechanics 15 3 Solution Architecture: Future Vision 16 3.1 Aventus Registry 16 3.1.1 Legitimate third party applications using the Protocol 16 3.1.2 Non-fraudulent events within the Protocol 17 3.1.3 Algorithmic parameters 17 3.2 Event 17 3.3 Ticket Sales 18 3.3.1 Secondary Market 19 3.4 Promotion 19 3.5 Market Price Oracle 20 4 Solution Architecture: Beta Release (June 2018) 20 4.1 Aventus Registry 21 4.1.1 Legitimate third party applications using the Protocol 21 4.1.2 Non-fraudulent events within the Protocol 21 4.1.3 System parameters 21 4.2 Event 21 4.3 Ticket Sales 22 4.3.1 Secondary Market 22 4.4 Promotion 22 4.5 Market Price Oracle 22 5 Roadmap 23 5.1 The Story So Far 23 5.2 Looking to the Future 23 5.2.1 AventusJS 24 5.2.2 Scalability Tools 24 5.2.3 Aventus Block Explorer 25 5.2.4 ÐApps Application Layer 25 5.2.5 Third-party B2B Application Layer 25 References 26 1 Problem 1.1 Industry Overview Tickets for entertainment events are typically available for consumers to buy via numerous sales channels.
    [Show full text]