Jcem2957.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
SPECIAL FEATURE Clinical Review A Critical Analysis of Clinically Available Somatostatin Analog Formulations for Therapy of Acromegaly Robert D. Murray and Shlomo Melmed Department of Endocrinology (R.D.M.), Leeds Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom; and Department of Medicine (S.M.), Cedars Sinai Medical Center, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/93/8/2957/2598353 by guest on 24 September 2021 California 90048 Context: Short and long-acting somatostatin (SRIF) analogs are approved for clinical use in acro- megaly. Recent analysis of the relative efficacy of octreotide LAR and lanreotide SR on the GH-IGF-I axis in acromegaly favored octreotide LAR in the secondary treatment of patients not preselected by SRIF responsiveness. A novel aqueous formulation of lanreotide, lanreotide Autogel (ATG), has recently been approved and is the predominant (and only in the United States) formulation of lanreotide used clinically. Objective: We performed a critical review of SRIF analog treatment to establish the relative efficacy of three clinically available SRIF analog preparations, octreotide LAR, lanreotide SR, and lanreotide ATG (Somatuline depot in the United States) in control of the GH-IGF-I axis in acromegaly. Data Sources: Data were drawn from MEDLINE and the bibliography of analyses of long-acting SRIF analogs. Data Collection: We reviewed the largest studies of sc octreotide, octreotide LAR, and lanreotide SR, all that included biochemical end-point data for lanreotide ATG, and studies that directly compared the efficacy of octreotide LAR and lanreotide SR. Data Synthesis: Caveats considered included differences in baseline GH and IGF-I values, patient selection, and interassay and intraassay variability, confounding the analysis. Studies comparing patients treated contiguously with lanreotide SR and octreotide LAR are fraught with method- ological problems, however, are suggestive of marginally greater efficacy in control of the GH-IGF-I axis for octreotide LAR. Lanreotide ATG shows noninferiority to lanreotide SR. Five small studies directly comparing octreotide LAR and lanreotide ATG suggest no significant differences between these preparations in control of biochemical end-points. Conclusion: Lanreotide ATG and octreotide LAR are equivalent in the control of symptoms and biochemical markers in patients with acromegaly. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93: 2957–2968, 2008) cromegaly is a rare disease resulting from a benign pituitary cular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory disease (2–4). The most A somatotrophinoma in over 95% of cases (1), and is char- robust determinant of excess mortality is the circulating GH level acterized clinically by excessive skeletal growth, soft tissue en- (2, 5), though some studies have suggested that IGF-I levels may largement, disability, and shortened life expectancy. Estimates of contribute to adverse mortality outcomes (6, 7). Successful man- the excess mortality from epidemiological studies suggest an ap- agement requires aggressive reduction of GH levels to less than proximate 2-fold relative risk ascribed primarily to cardiovas- 0021-972X/08/$15.00/0 Abbreviations: ATG, Autogel; SRIF, somatostatin; SSTR, specific receptor subtype. Printed in U.S.A. Copyright © 2008 by The Endocrine Society doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-0027 Received January 4, 2008. Accepted May 2, 2008. First Published Online May 13, 2008 J Clin Endocrinol Metab, August 2008, 93(8):2957–2968 jcem.endojournals.org 2957 2958 Murray and Melmed SRIF Analogs J Clin Endocrinol Metab, August 2008, 93(8):2957–2968 2.5 g/liter (5 mU/liter) to achieve mortality rates equivalent to tively. Collectively, these studies suggested that biochemical con- the normal population (2, 5). trol of acromegaly with clinical improvement could be achieved Therapeutic modalities available to achieve this target include in 50–60% of patients using thrice daily sc octreotide (Table 1). surgery, radiotherapy, and medical therapy. Surgery by a skilled neurosurgeon remains the mainstay of management, especially for small tumors. However, biochemical control is achieved in Long-Acting SRIF Analogs less than 50% of patients with macroadenomas, but greater than 80% of microadenomas (1). Control of GH and IGF-I levels after Octreotide requires sc administration three times per day to radiotherapy occurs over a period of many years and frequently maintain GH suppression, and biochemical “escape” was fre- takes more than a decade. Therefore, medical therapy plays a quently observed at the end of the dosing interval impacting on crucial role in a large proportion of patients with acromegaly overall biochemical control. In an effort to increase the dosing who fail to be cured by surgery, or during the interim while the interval and provide more sustained control of GH levels, two Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/93/8/2957/2598353 by guest on 24 September 2021 effects of radiotherapy are realized. Somatostatin (SRIF) analogs long-acting depot formulations of SRIF analogs, octreotide LAR introduced in the mid-1980s have become the mainstay of med- and lanreotide SR, were developed. Both peptide molecules are ical management (1, 8). SRIF analogs have been used with suc- comprised of eight amino acids with a disulfide bridge, and are cess as primary therapy in which operative intervention is un- formulated as microspheres of biodegradable polymer contain- likely to be curative or is associated with an unacceptable risk of ing the active peptide. Octreotide LAR 10–30 mg is injected im morbidity and mortality (1, 9, 10). every 4 wk and lanreotide SR 30 mg im every 7–14 d. Efficacy of In this review we have confined comparisons of efficacy of both these preparations in the treatment of acromegaly has been long-acting SRIF analogs in patients with acromegaly to the bio- shown in a large number of studies (27–34). Most studies ex- chemical control of disease. Relative tumor shrinkage is an im- amining the efficacy of long-acting SRIF analogs have studied portant determinant of which SRIF analog is used clinically, patients after surgery and/or radiotherapy, however, more re- however, there are currently no data from studies randomizing cently, have included a subset of patients who have been treated patients to different analogs and using tumor shrinkage as a as primary therapy. Current evidence supports a similar rate of primary end-point. Switch studies are of limited value because GH and IGF-I normalization in patients treated as primary or tumor shrinkage is greatest when SRIF analogs are used as pri- secondary therapy (9, 30). Due to difficulties differentiating be- mary therapy and during the first 3-months treatment. tween primary and secondary treatment in most studies, this review will not differentiate between these subgroups. Baldelli et al. (27) and Verhelst et al. (28) studied the efficacy SRIF and Octreotide of lanreotide SR in 118 and 66 patients with acromegaly, re- spectively (Table 1). In both studies patients were switched from SRIF is widely distributed within multiple organ systems, and sc octreotide to lanreotide SR, and the dose of the latter opti- plays an important role in regulating hormone release and other mized on the basis of the biochemistry. Overall, lanreotide SR physiological functions (11). The two most biologically active was found to be more efficacious in controlling GH and IGF-I SRIF isoforms comprise 14 or 28 amino acids. SRIF action is levels than sc octreotide, with 44–77% of patients achieving mediated through five specific receptor subtypes (SSTRs) (1–5) biochemical targets. The largest two studies of octreotide LAR differentially expressed in a tissue-specific pattern, thereby con- enrolled 151 and 110 patients with active acromegaly (29, 30) ferring functional and therapeutic specificity of ligand action (Table 1). In the first of these studies, Lancranjan and Atkinson (12). Somatotrophs preferentially express SSTR2 and SSTR5 (1999) (29) commenced patients on octreotide LAR after 4-wk (13–15), and respond predominantly to SSTR2-binding analogs individualized sc octreotide, whereas in the second study, pa- (16, 17). SSTRs interact with each other (18), indicating complex tients were naive to SRIF analogs (30). Biochemical targets of GH pituitary cell responsiveness to receptor ligands (19). SRIF ana- less than 2.5 g/liter and a normalized IGF-I were achieved in logs also act at the periphery to inhibit GH action (20). Both 63–75% of patients. However, of note is that the overall per- octreotide and lanreotide exhibit similar affinities for SSTR2 and centage of patients controlled by lanreotide SR and octreotide SSTR5 in vitro, and apparent differences in clinical efficacy LAR was not unduly different from that observed in previous discussed in this review, therefore, likely relate to differences studies strictly optimizing the dose of sc octreotide. in pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the various A direct comparison of the percentages of patients achieving formulations. GH and IGF-I targets at the end of these four relatively large Recognition that SRIF is the primary physiological negative studies suggests that octreotide LAR exhibits greater efficacy regulator of pituitary GH release led to investigation of a ther- than lanreotide SR. However, in the Lancranjan and Atkinson apeutic role for SRIF in managing acromegaly. Although SRIF (29) study, all patients were selected on the basis of a significant inhibited GH release from somatotrophinomas (21, 22), clinical known prior response to sc octreotide. Therefore, it is likely that usefulness was limited due to a half-life of 2–3 min. This thera- this cohort would have responded well to any clinically available peutic limitation was eased by the development of the SRIF an- long-acting SRIF analog. This interpretation is supported by ex- alog, octreotide, first used in clinical trials in 1984 (23, 24). Two amining the proportion of patients with suppression of GH less of the largest studies using this peptide were published in the than 2.5 g/liter when receiving sc octreotide.