DOCSLIB.ORG

Sara Diamond Collection on the U.S. Right

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sara Diamond Collection on the U.S. Right http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8h998j5 No online items Finding Aid to the Sara Diamond Collection on the U.S. Right Lara Michels The Bancroft Library 2015 The Bancroft Library University of California Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 [email protected] URL: http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/libraries/bancroft-library Finding Aid to the Sara Diamond BANC MSS 98/70 cz 1 Collection on the U.S. Right Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: The Bancroft Library Title: Sara Diamond collection on the U.S. Right Creator: Diamond, Sara Identifier/Call Number: BANC MSS 98/70 cz Physical Description: 66 linear feet (50 cartons, 1 box, 6 oversize boxes) Date (bulk): approximately 1950-1997 (bulk 1980-1997) Abstract: Research materials on the religious and political right gathered by Sara Diamond during the 1980s and 1990s. For current information on the location of these materials, please consult the Library's online catalog. Language of Material: Collection materials are in English. Conditions Governing Access Collection is open for research. Conditions Governing Use Materials in this collection may be protected by the U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.). In addition, the reproduction of some materials may be restricted by terms of University of California gift or purchase agreements, donor restrictions, privacy and publicity rights, licensing and trademarks. Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of without permission of the copyright owner. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user. All requests to reproduce, publish, quote from, or otherwise use collection materials must be submitted in writing to the Head of Public Services, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley 94720-6000. See: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/reference/permissions.html. Immediate Source of Acquisition The Sara Diamond collection on the U.S. right was gifted to the Bancroft Library by Sara Diamond in 1998. Processing Information Processed by Lara Michels in April 2015. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Sara Diamond collection on the U.S. right, BANC MSS 98/70 cz, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. Biographical / Historical Sara Diamond is a practicing attorney in Berkeley, California. She received an undergraduate degree from the University of California, Irvine, a doctorate in sociology from the University of California, Berkeley, and a law degree from Hastings College of Law. Her dissertation was entitled Right-Wing Movements in the United States, 1945-1992. She is the author of four books on the political and religious right in the United States, including Spiritual Warfare: The Politics of the Christian Right, Roads to Dominion: Right-Wing Movements and Political Power in the United States, Facing the Wrath: Confronting the Right in Dangerous Times, and Not by Politics Alone: The Enduring Influence of the Christian Right. Content Description The collection consists of the research materials on the religious and political right that Sara Diamond gathered during the 1980s and 1990s. These materials document organizations, individuals, and topics connected to right-wing movements in the United States, mainly in the 1980s and 1990s but also, to some extent, in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s. Included are mailings; newspapers, magazines, and other publications generated by right-wing organizations; correspondence; conference brochures and handouts; books published by right-wing individuals and organizations; reports; news clippings; and assorted other research material. Subjects and Indexing Terms Diamond, Sara Robertson, Pat Buchanan, Patrick J. (Patrick Joseph) Christian Coalition Chalcedon (Organization) Focus on the Family Finding Aid to the Sara Diamond BANC MSS 98/70 cz 2 Collection on the U.S. Right Promise Keepers (Organization) Sword of the Spirit (Organization) Christian Booksellers Association Christian Broadcasting Network (U.S.) National Endowment for Democracy (U.S.) United States Institute of Peace Heritage Foundation (Washington, D.C.) Rand Corporation Republican Party (U.S. : 1854- ) Unification Church Dominion theology Discipling (Christianity) Religious broadcasting Home schooling Christian education Pro-life movement Homophobia Television in religion Libertarians Conservatism Anti-communist movements Series 1: Christian right organizations and topics approximately 1980-1997 carton 1, Chalcedon Foundation 1985-1997 folder 1-14 carton 1, Christian Coalition: Ralph Reed books; Christian American (publication), leadership folder 15-19 training tapes (cassettes) approximately 1990-1997 carton 2, Christian Coalition: assorted leadership materials; miscellaneous; Road to Victory folder 1-22 files approximately 1990-1997 carton 3, Christian Coalition: miscellany approximately 1990-1997 folder 1-2 oversize-box 4 Christian Coalition: issues of the Christian America newspaper 1991-1995 carton 3, Pat Robertson approximately 1984-1996 folder 3-19 carton 3, Focus on the Family approximately 1987-1997 folder 20-26 carton 4, Focus on the Family 1987-1997 folder 1-12 carton 4, Promise Keepers approximately 1993-1997 folder 13-19 carton 5, Promise Keepers 1993-1997 folder 1-7 Miscellaneous Christian/Evangelical organizations carton 5, folder 8 About My Father's Business, Incorporated 1988-1990 carton 5, Acton Institute 1990-1995 folder 9-11 carton 5, folder 12 American Coalition for Traditional Values 1985-1988 carton 5, folder 13 AD 2000 and Beyond 1994 carton 5, folder 14 Alamo 1986 carton 5, folder 15 Association of International Mission Services 1987 carton 5, folder 16 Ray Allen 1988 Finding Aid to the Sara Diamond BANC MSS 98/70 cz 3 Collection on the U.S. Right Series 1: Christian right organizations and topics approximately 1980-1997 carton 5, folder 17 Alliance Defense Fund 1994-1996 carton 5, folder 18 Ambassador Ad Agency undated carton 5, American Family Association 1992-1997 folder 19-22 carton 5, American Center for Law and Justice 1992-1997 folder 23-24 carton 6, American Freedom Coalition 1987-1991 folder 1-3 carton 6, folder 4 Assemblies of God 1988-1994 carton 6, folder 5 Armageddon 1985-1987 carton 6, folder 6 Assist 1990 carton 6, folder 7 Athletes in Action 1987 carton 6, David Balsinger 1984-1989 folder 8-9 carton 6, folder 10 Berean Call 1992-1996 carton 6, folder 11 Bible Literature International approximately 1988 carton 6, folder 12 David Bradshaw and Associates approximately 1993 carton 6, folder 13 William Marion Branham 1986 carton 6, folder 14 Caleb Project 1987 carton 6, folder 15 California Christian right, general approximately 1992-1994 carton 6, folder 16 California Pro-Life Council approximately 1994 carton 6, folder 17 Calvary Chapel approximately 1985 carton 6, folder 18 Calvary Commission 1987-1988 carton 6, Campus Crusade 1985-1994 folder 19-23 carton 6, folder 24 Capitol Resource Center 1992-1994 carton 6, folder 25 Carribean Christian Ministries 1987-1988 carton 6, Christian Emergency Relief Team (CERT) 1986-1988 folder 26-27 carton 7, folder 1 Morris Cerullo 1987-1988 carton 7, folder 2 Chapel Hill Harvester Church 1988-1989 carton 7, folder 3 Center for World Christian Interaction 1987 carton 7, folder 4 Reverend Paul Cho approximately 1986 carton 7, folder 5 Chaplaincy Full Gospel Churches 1987-1990 carton 7, Christ for the Nations 1986-1993 folder 6-9 carton 7, Christian Aid Mission 1985-1992 folder 10-12 carton 7, folder 13 Christian Action Netword approximately 1992-1994 carton 7, folder 14 Christian Aid Ministries--Romania 1985-1990 carton 7, folder 15 Christian Believers United 1987 carton 7, Christian Anti-Communism Crusade 1985-1992 folder 16-21 carton 7, folder 22 Christian Equippers International approximately 1986 carton 7, folder 23 Christian Information Network, Colorado Springs approximately 1993 carton 7, folder 24 Christian Legal Society 1986-1987 carton 8, Christian Research Institute 1993-1995 folder 1-3 carton 8, Christian Voice 1983-1987 folder 4-6 carton 8, folder 7 Christian Voters' League 1992 carton 8, folder 8 Church League of America 1982-1984 carton 8, folder 9 Coalition for Christians in Government 1986 carton 8, folder 10 Coalition for Religious Freedom 1986 carton 8, Coalition on Revival 1986-1992 folder 11-15 carton 8, folder 16 Ed Cole Ministries 1987-1988 carton 8, folder 17 Committee on Moral Concerns 1986 Finding Aid to the Sara Diamond BANC MSS 98/70 cz 4 Collection on the U.S. Right Series 1: Christian right organizations and topics approximately 1980-1997 carton 8, Concerned Women for America approximately 1984-1994 folder 18-24 carton 8, folder 25 Conferences, miscellaneous 1994-1995 carton 8, folder 26 Congress on the Bible II 1987 carton 9, folder 1 Conservative Caucus 1981-1996 carton 9, folder 2 Coors 1986-1994 carton 9, folder 3 Kenneth Copeland 1985-1988 carton 9, folder 4 Coral Ridge 1994-1995 carton 9, folder 5 Council for National Policy 1982-1993 carton 9, folder 6 Christian Rescue Effort for the Emancipation of Dissidents (CREED) 1985-1988 carton 9, folder 7 Crossings book club undated carton 9, folder 8 Culture Wars (publication) 1996 carton 9, folder 9 Disciplining a Whole Nation (DAWN) approximately 1986 carton 9, folder 10 Bill Dannemeyer 1994 carton 9, folder 11 Eagle International 1986-1990 carton 9, folder 12 Eagle's Nest 1986 carton 9, folder 13 End-Time Handmaidens 1989-1992 carton 9, folder 14 Evangel Temple (Meares) 1987 carton 9, folder 15 Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1327 American Grand Strat Text
    DAY V U.S.-CHINA RELATIONS:THE U.S. DOMESTIC CONTEXT THOMAS E. DONILON1 PARTNER O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP u U.S. relations with China have for decades been subject to the push and pull of domestic politi- cal influences and pressures. As Ambassador Richard Holbrooke recently noted, “[w]hat vastly complicates U.S.-China relations is that every major policy issue between the two countries is also a domestic matter with its own lobbying groups and nongovernmental organizations ranging across the political spectrum.”2 These influences have ebbed and flowed over time. During the 1950s, the “Who Lost China” debate and domestic fears over Communist infiltration played a major role in shaping U.S. attitudes Seven Presidents from both toward “Red China.” By the 1970s, the strategic priority of containing the Soviet political parties have pursued a bloc had submerged hostile domestic atti- strikingly consistent policy of tudes toward China and allowed President Nixon to make his historic “opening” in engagement toward China. 1972. Subsequently, the collapse of the Soviet Union eroded the foundation on which the Sino-American relationship had been built, leaving it exposed to the currents of domes- tic opinion and the hailstorm of criticism after the events at Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989. Through it all, seven Presidents from both political parties have pursued a strikingly consistent policy of engagement toward China with the goal of integrating the People’s Republic into full and constructive membership in the international community.3 On the surface, the George W. Bush years have seen stability and relative calm in U.S.-China relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Research Council As Amicus Curiae in Support of the Respondent ______
    Nos. 18-1323 & 18-1460 In the Supreme Court of the United States _____________ JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES LLC, ET AL., Petitioners and Cross-Respondents, v. DR. REBEKAH GEE, SECRETARY, LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HOSPITALS, Respondent and Cross-Petitioner. _____________ ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________ BRIEF OF FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF THE RESPONDENT _____________ TRAVIS S. WEBER JONATHAN F. MITCHELL KATHERINE BECK JOHNSON Counsel of Record Family Research Council Mitchell Law PLLC 801 G Street NW 111 Congress Avenue Washington, DC 20001 Suite 400 (800) 225-4008 Austin, Texas 78701 [email protected] (512) 686-3940 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Amicus Curiae ! TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of contents ................................................................... i! Table of authorities ............................................................. iii! Interest of amicus curiae ...................................................... 1! Summary of argument .......................................................... 2! I.! The plaintiffs lack statutory standing to challenge Act 620 ....................................................... 5! A.! The plaintiffs must identify a cause of action that authorizes them to sue state officials who violate the constitutional rights of third parties ......................................... 6! B.! There is no cause of action that authorizes abortion providers to sue state officials who violate
    [Show full text]
  • The Heritage Foundation and Family Research Council: Mirror Images of Hate
    The Heritage Foundation and Family Research Council: Mirror Images of Hate The Heritage Foundation is fond of branding itself as a think tank of establishment conservatives. In reality, Heritage regularly spouts hateful ideas that are detrimental to LGBTQ individuals, women, people of color and low-income workers. Heritage’s policy positions are not dissimilar from those of peer organizations such as the Family Research Council (FRC) that have earned designation from the Southern Poverty Law Center as hate groups. More information on Heritage’s hateful policies and its influence on the Trump administration can be found in our report, “The Heritage Foundation’s Health Department: How an Increasingly Radical Right Wing Think Tank Is Controlling HHS — to the Detriment of Reproductive Health and Other Human Rights.” Policy Position Comparison Between The Heritage Foundation and the Family Research Council The Heritage Foundation Family Research Council Anti-Abortion Heritage Is Opposed to a Women's Right to FRC Believes Roe v. Wade Was Wrongly Obtain an Abortion and Works to Undermine Decided and Actively Works to Have the Women’s Access to Reproductive Healthcare Decision Reversed "Since Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton "Few things touch on the sanctity of effectively legalized abortion on demand, more human life more than the practice of than 58 million children have been denied the abortion. A pregnancy should not simply right to life. For over forty years the pro-life be 'terminated,' as if it were something community has worked to counter the impersonal and problematic and it cannot devastating impact abortion has had on be without physical and emotional mothers, fathers, and their unborn babies, consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • I Used to Be Antifa Gabriel Nadales
    I Used to be Antifa Gabriel Nadales There was a time in my life when I was angry, bitter, and deeply unhappy. I wanted to lash out at the whole “fascist” system—the greedy, heartless power structure that didn’t care about me or the rest of society’s innocent victims, a system that had robbed, beaten and stolen from my ancestors. The whole corrupt edifice deserved to be brought down, reduced to rubble. I was a perfect recruit for Antifa, the left-wing group which claims to fight against fascism. And so, I became a member. Now I was one of those who had the guts to fight against “the fascists” who were exploiting disadvantaged people. I wasn’t a ‘card-carrying’ antifascist—there is no such thing as an official Antifa membership. But I was ready at a moment’s notice to slip on the black mask and march in what Antifa calls “the black bloc”—a cadre of other black-clad Antifa members— to taunt police and destroy property. Antifa stands for “antifascist,” but that’s purposefully deceptive. For one thing, the very name is calibrated so that anyone who dares to criticize the group or its tactics can be labeled “fascist.” This allows Antifa to justify violence against all who dare stand up or speak out against them. A few groups boldly declare themselves Antifa, like “Rose City Antifa” in Portland. But most don’t, preferring to avoid the negative publicity. That’s part of Antifa’s appeal—and strength: It’s hard to pin down.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Freedom for Churches the U.S
    Protecting how we practice our faith BRUCE HAUSKNECHT, ESQ Paying a High Price 2 PAYING A HIGH PRICE Religious Freedom for Churches The U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. today for religious freedom in the U.S. (and not just and Religious Organizations 3 Hodges,1 handed down on June 26, 2015, made in regard to marriage): same-sex marriage the law of the land and created Religious Freedom a “new” set of constitutional rights. By a vote of 5-4, ■ Aaron and Melissa Klein3 are a Christian in the Military 5 the millennia-old, one-man, one-woman definition couple from Gresham, Oregon, who owned of marriage was tossed aside in favor of sexual a bakery. They were fined $135,000 by the Religious Freedom liberty—a decision that will have profound effects state for failing to bake a cake for a same-sex in Public Schools 7 on American life and the freedoms we often take wedding, and have been forced to close their for granted. bakery due to the controversy. Religious Freedom in the Workplace 10 In 2016, the Obergefell impact spread to the issue of “gender identity” as the U.S. Department of Education issued an edict to the nation's schools, Religious Freedom in Government saying that boys who claim to “identify” as girls (and and the Public Square 11 vice versa) can choose to use the restrooms, locker rooms, and shower facilities of the opposite sex. What Can I Do to Common sense, public safety, and the orthodox Protect Religious Freedom? 13 Christian view2 that “male and female He created them” have been rejected in the government push for the new sexual orthodoxy made possible by 4 ■ Barronelle Stutzman, a florist in the Obergefell ruling.
    [Show full text]
  • Litigation, Argumentative Strategies, and Coalitions in the Same-Sex Marriage Struggle
    Florida State University College of Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Publications Winter 2012 The Terms of the Debate: Litigation, Argumentative Strategies, and Coalitions in the Same-Sex Marriage Struggle Mary Ziegler Florida State University College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/articles Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, and the Litigation Commons Recommended Citation Mary Ziegler, The Terms of the Debate: Litigation, Argumentative Strategies, and Coalitions in the Same- Sex Marriage Struggle, 39 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. 467 (2012), Available at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/articles/332 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE TERMS OF THE DEBATE: LITIGATION, ARGUMENTATIVE STRATEGIES, AND COALITIONS IN THE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE STRUGGLE MARY ZIEGLER ABSTRACT Why, in the face of ongoing criticism, do advocates of same-sex marriage continue to pursue litigation? Recently, Perry v. Schwarzenegger, a challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage, and Gill v. Office of Personnel Management, a lawsuit challenging section three of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, have created divisive debate. Leading scholarship and commentary on the litigation of decisions like Perry and Gill have been strongly critical, predicting that it will produce a backlash that will undermine the same- sex marriage cause. These studies all rely on a particular historical account of past same-sex marriage decisions and their effect on political debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Our 2020 Form
    PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COPY Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax OMB No. 1545-0047 Form 990 Under section 501(c), 527, or 4947(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (except private foundations) 2020 a Department of the Treasury Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. Open to Public Internal Revenue Service a Go to www.irs.gov/Form990 for instructions and the latest information. Inspection A For the 2020 calendar year, or tax year beginning , 2020, and ending , 20 B Check if applicable: C Name of organization LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE D Employer identification number Address change Doing business as 51-0235174 Name change Number and street (or P.O. box if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite E Telephone number Initial return 1101 N HIGHLAND STREET (703) 247-2000 Final return/terminated City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code Amended return ARLINGTON, VA 22201 G Gross receipts $ 24,354,691 Application pending F Name and address of principal officer: MORTON BLACKWELL H(a) Is this a group return for subordinates? Yes ✔ No SAME AS C ABOVE H(b) Are all subordinates included? Yes No I Tax-exempt status: 501(c)(3) 501(c) ( ) ` (insert no.) 4947(a)(1) or 527 If “No,” attach a list. See instructions J Website: a WWW.LEADERSHIPINSTITUTE.ORG H(c) Group exemption number a K Form of organization: Corporation Trust Association Other a L Year of formation: 1979 M State of legal domicile: VA Part I Summary 1 Briefly describe the organization’s mission or most significant activities: EDUCATE PEOPLE FOR SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION IN GOVERNMENT, POLITICS AND MEDIA.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2013 COME Volume 14 Number 3
    the Flame The Magazine of Claremont Graduate University Spring 2013 COME Volume 14 Number 3 The Flame is published by Claremont Graduate University 150 East Tenth Street Claremont, California 91711 ©2013 by Claremont Graduate BACK TO University Director of University Communications Esther Wiley Managing Editor Brendan Babish CAMPUS Art Director Shari Fournier-O’Leary News Editor Rod Leveque Online Editor WITHOUT Sheila Lefor Editorial Contributors Mandy Bennett Dean Gerstein Kelsey Kimmel Kevin Riel LEAVING Emily Schuck Rachel Tie Director of Alumni Services Monika Moore Distribution Manager HOME Mandy Bennett Every semester CGU holds scores of lectures, performances, and other events Photographers Marc Campos on our campus. Jonathan Gibby Carlos Puma On Claremont Graduate University’s YouTube channel you can view the full video of many William Vasta Tom Zasadzinski of our most notable speakers, events, and faculty members: www.youtube.com/cgunews. Illustration Below is just a small sample of our recent postings: Thomas James Claremont Graduate University, founded in 1925, focuses exclusively on graduate-level study. It is a member of the Claremont Colleges, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, distinguished professor of psychology in CGU’s School of a consortium of seven independent Behavioral and Organizational Sciences, talks about why one of the great challenges institutions. to positive psychology is to help keep material consumption within sustainable limits. President Deborah A. Freund Executive Vice President and Provost Jacob Adams Jack Scott, former chancellor of the California Community Colleges, and Senior Vice President for Finance Carl Cohn, member of the California Board of Education, discuss educational and Administration politics in California, with CGU Provost Jacob Adams moderating.
    [Show full text]
  • Warmsley Cornellgrad 0058F 1
    ON THE DETECTION OF HATE SPEECH, HATE SPEAKERS AND POLARIZED GROUPS IN ONLINE SOCIAL MEDIA A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Dana Warmsley December 2017 c 2017 Dana Warmsley ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ON THE DETECTION OF HATE SPEECH, HATE SPEAKERS AND POLARIZED GROUPS IN ONLINE SOCIAL MEDIA Dana Warmsley, Ph.D. Cornell University 2017 The objective of this dissertation is to explore the use of machine learning algorithms in understanding and detecting hate speech, hate speakers and po- larized groups in online social media. Beginning with a unique typology for detecting abusive language, we outline the distinctions and similarities of dif- ferent abusive language subtasks (offensive language, hate speech, cyberbully- ing and trolling) and how we might benefit from the progress made in each area. Specifically, we suggest that each subtask can be categorized based on whether or not the abusive language being studied 1) is directed at a specific individ- ual, or targets a generalized “Other” and 2) the extent to which the language is explicit versus implicit. We then use knowledge gained from this typology to tackle the “problem of offensive language” in hate speech detection. A key challenge for automated hate speech detection on social media is the separation of hate speech from other instances of offensive language. We present a Logistic Regression classifier, trained on human annotated Twitter data, that makes use of a uniquely derived lexicon of hate terms along with features that have proven successful in the detection of offensive language, hate speech and cyberbully- ing.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Message to the 117Th Congress: Don't Draft Our Daughters
    Special Message to the 117th Congress: Don’t Draft Our Daughters August 31, 2021 Dear Senators and Representatives, We write to you united in serious concern about the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for 2022 which the Senate Armed Services Committee approved on July 21. The legislation is unacceptable because it would amend the Military Selective Service Act (MSSA) to require young women to register with Selective Service for a possible future draft. Sen. Jack Reed’s deceptively simple language – reportedly to change the MSSA words “male citizens” to “all Americans” – is unnecessary, unwise, and, in our view, outrageous. Imposition of Selective Service obligations, including a possible future draft of our daughters, sisters, and nieces, would not only hurt women, it would compromise our military’s essential function during a time of catastrophic national emergency. A monumental and consequential reversal such as this should not be approved behind closed doors, and the full Senate and House should not rubber-stamp “Draft Our Daughters” language in the NDAA. The only acceptable option is to strike the Reed amendment and seriously, thoroughly, and responsibly consider what the Selective Service law really means. This is a matter of national security – not “women’s rights,” “men’s rights,” or civilian volunteer service. Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution assigns to Congress the authority to establish and support the armed forces and to ensure that they are prepared to secure our nation and defend our freedom. As the Supreme Court has recognized, the purpose of a draft is not to fill various non- combat billets, it is to quickly provide qualified replacements for combat casualties.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNSHIP RESOURCES and HELPFUL SEARCH LINKS These Sites Allow You to Do Advanced Searches for Internships Nationwide
    CHRISTENDOM COLLEGE OFFICE OF CAREER & LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT 2017 INTERNSHIP LIST New Jobs…………………………………………………………………………….. 2 Politics/Non-profit…………………………………………………………………... 3 Public Policy/Non-profit …………………………………………………………... 5 Business……………………………………………………………………………... 10 Journalism and Media ……………………………………………………………… 11 Catholic/Pro-Life/Religious Freedom ……………………………………………… 13 Academic/Student Conferences and Fellowships ………………………………….. 14 Other ………………………………………………………………………………... 15 Internship Resources and Search Links …………………………………………….. 16 Please note: this is not meant to be exhaustive list, nor are all internships endorsed by Christendom College or the Office of Career Development. Many of the internships below are in the Metropolitan DC area, but there are thousands of internships available around the country. Use the resources on pg. 16 to do a search by field and location. Questions? Need help with your resume, cover letter, or composing an email? Contact Colleen Harmon: [email protected] ** Indicates alumni have or currently do work at this location. If you plan to apply to these internships, please let Colleen know so she can notify them. 1 NEW JOBS! National Journalism Center- summer deadline March 20 The National Journalism Center, a project of Young America's Foundation, provides aspiring conservative and libertarian journalists with the premier opportunity to learn the principles and practice of responsible reporting. The National Journalism Center combines 12 weeks of on-the- job training at a Washington, D.C.-based media outlet and once-weekly training seminars led by prominent journalists, policy experts, and NJC faculty. The program matches interns with print, broadcast, or online media outlets based on their interests and experience. Interns spend 30 hours/week gaining practical, hands-on journalism experience. Potential placements include The Washington Times, The Washington Examiner, CNN, Fox News Channel, and more.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tea Party Movement As a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 10-2014 The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 Albert Choi Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/343 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 by Albert Choi A master’s thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, The City University of New York 2014 i Copyright © 2014 by Albert Choi All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Master of Arts. THE City University of New York iii Abstract The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 by Albert Choi Advisor: Professor Frances Piven The Tea Party movement has been a keyword in American politics since its inception in 2009.
    [Show full text]