DOCSLIB.ORG

Extent and Conservation of Tropical Dry Forests in the Americas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Extent and Conservation of Tropical Dry Forests in the Americas Biological Conservation 143 (2010) 144–155 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Extent and conservation of tropical dry forests in the Americas C.A. Portillo-Quintero, G.A. Sánchez-Azofeifa * Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada T6G 2E3 article info abstract Article history: This paper shows the results of an assessment on the current extent of Neotropical dry forests based on a Received 26 May 2009 supervised classification of MODIS surface reflectance imagery at 500-m resolution. Our findings show Received in revised form 16 September that tropical dry forests extend for 519,597 km2 across North and South America. Mexico, Brazil and Boli- 2009 via harbor the largest and best-preserved dry forest fragments. Mexico contains the largest extent at Accepted 24 September 2009 181,461 km2 (38% of the total), although it remains poorly represented under protected areas. On the Available online 29 October 2009 other hand, Brazil and Bolivia contain the largest proportion of protected tropical dry forests and the larg- est extent in continuous forest fragments. We found that five single ecoregions account for more than half Keywords: of the tropical dry forests in the Americas (continental and insular) and these ecoregions are: the Chiquit- Conservation Deforestation ano dry forests, located in Bolivia and Brazil (27.5%), the Atlantic dry forests (10.2%), the Sinaloan dry Extent forests in Mexico (9.7%), the Cuban dry forests (7.1%) and the Bajio dry forests in Mexico (7%). Chiquitano 2 2 Fragmentation dry forests alone contain 142,941 km of dry forests. Of the approximately 23,000 km of dry forest under MODIS legal protection, 15,000 km2 are located in just two countries, Bolivia and Brazil. In fact, Bolivia protects Tropical dry forests 10,609 km2 of dry forests, where 7600 km2 are located within the Chiquitano dry forest ecoregion and protected by a single park. Low extent and high fragmentation of dry forests in countries like Guatemala, Nicaragua, Ecuador, Costa Rica and Peru means that these forests are at a higher risk from human disturbance and deforestation. Ó 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction characteristics are attractive for human settlement and develop- ment in the tropics (Tosi and Voertman, 1964; Sánchez-Azofeifa Tropical dry forests are among the most threatened ecosystems et al., 2005). Furthermore, most scientific efforts for the study in the world as a consequence of intensive anthropogenic distur- and conservation of tropical vegetation have focused on tropical bance (Janzen, 1988; Hoekstra et al., 2005). Ewel (1999) explains rain forests, while little attention has been paid to tropical dry for- that in this particular ecosystem, the environmental constraints ests despite its high species richness and endemism of woody on human development are low in comparison to others. Here, an- plants, especially in continental and oceanic islands (Trejo and nual rainfall does not deviate greatly from potential evapotranspi- Dirzo, 2000; Sánchez-Azofeifa et al., 2005; Gillespie et al., 2005; ration, irrigation water is needed in modest amounts, yet rainfall is Kier et al., 2005). not so high that pest and nutrient leaching are overbearing prob- Several authors have defined tropical dry forests in different lems (Ewel, 1999). This ecosystem has historically supported high ways, based on similar or different criteria. Mooney et al. (1995) human population densities given that its climatic and edaphic defines the tropical dry forest simply as forests occurring in tropi- cal regions characterized by pronounced seasonality in rainfall dis- tribution with several months of drought. Sánchez-Azofeifa et al. Abbreviations: AVHRR, Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer; ESRI, (2005) describes tropical dry forests as a vegetation type typically Environmental Systems Research Institute; ETM, enhanced thematic mapper; dominated by deciduous trees where at least 50% of trees present GHRC, Global Historical Climatology Network; GLCF, Global Land Cover Facility; are drought deciduous, the mean annual temperature is >25 °C, ha, hectares; IR, infrared; IUCN, International Union for the Conservation of Nature; total annual precipitation ranges between 700 and 2000 mm, and km, kilometers; km2, square kilometers; m, meters; mm, millimeters; MODIS, Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer; NGOs, non-governmental orga- there are three or more dry months every year (precipitation nizations; NLCD, National Land Cover Database; PES, payment for environmental <100 mm). Pennington et al. (2006) uses a wider interpretation services; SPOT, Systeme Pour l’Observation de la Terre; SRTM, Shuttle Radar of tropical dry forests which includes vegetation that experience Topography Mission; TM, Thematic Mapper. a minimum dry season period of 5–6 months with concomitant * Corresponding author. Address: Earth Observation Systems Laboratory, Depart- strongly seasonal ecological processes and functions. This defini- ment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3. Tel.: +1 780 492 1822; fax: +1 780 492 2030. tion includes diverse formations such as forests within grasslands, E-mail address: [email protected] (G.A. Sánchez-Azofeifa). shrublands and savanna ecosystems; from tall forests on the 0006-3207/$ - see front matter Ó 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.09.020 C.A. Portillo-Quintero, G.A. Sánchez-Azofeifa / Biological Conservation 143 (2010) 144–155 145 more humid dry forest sites to cactus scrub on the driest. Sánchez- 2. Methods Azofeifa et al. (2005) also considers savannas, gallery forests, coast- lines and mangroves among the associated vegetation types that 2.1. Definition of tropical dry forest can occur within the matrix of tropical dry forests. Despite the many different definitions, it is essential to map the extent and Rather than limiting our study to a single definition of tropical geographical distribution of these important tropical forest dry forest, our analysis intends to examine the extent of tropical formations. dry forest in a broad sense. We took into account main bioclimatic More than half of tropical dry forests occur in the Americas and phenological characteristics as indicated by several authors (approximately 54%, according to Miles et al., 2006). These are re- (Olson et al., 2001; Sánchez-Azofeifa et al., 2005; Pennington ferred to as Neotropical dry forests. At present, Neotropical dry for- et al., 2006, Mooney et al., 1995), which are more relevant from ests exist as fragments of a once large, contiguous forest that the remote sensing point of view. Bioclimatic constraints for trop- reached from Mexico to Northern Argentina, reduced primarily ical dry forests were used by the adopting Olson et al. (2001) global by the timber industry, indigenous fuel–wood extraction, and the biomes classification and Sánchez-Azofeifa et al. (2005) dry forest expansion of cattle ranching (Fajardo et al., 2005). In spite of our definition. Patterns of leaf phenology were also crucial during the awareness of the rapid destruction of dry forests, we still know image classification process in order to differentiate the spectral very little about the true current extent and degree of fragmenta- response of deciduous vegetation from the spectral response of tion of Neotropical dry forests. evergreen vegetation and also from other types of land use. The Coarse-scale resolution maps (>1 km spatial resolution) based use of tropical dry forest biome boundaries by Olson et al. (2001) on the analysis of multispectral imagery from sensors like Ad- and information on the patterns of leaf phenology during the im- vanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR), Systeme Pour age-processing phase is further explained in the next section. l’Observation de la Terre (SPOT) and Moderate Resolution Imaging The definition of tropical dry forest proposed by Olson et al. Spectroradiometer (MODIS) have provided comprehensive global (2001) excludes deciduous vegetation types that authors consider views of the distribution of Neotropical dry forests. Nonetheless, part of the dry forest ecosystem. For example, Caatinga forest is when examined closely, these maps are inaccurate and tend to characterized as low height forest consisting mostly of small decid- overestimate the extent of tropical humid forests and underesti- uous trees and shrubs, frequently displaying twisted trunks and mate the extent of tropical dry forests. Such errors affect the accu- thorns (Queiroz, 2006). Due to ecological and floristic similarities, racy of carbon stocks estimates based on forest maps, which are Pennington et al. (2000, 2006) considers Caatinga vegetation as essential for the implementation of conservation strategies such part of the Neotropical dry forests. However, Olson et al. (2001) as the Payments for Environmental Services (PES) initiatives (Kala- classifies this region as a shrubland ecosystem. The Olson et al. cska, 2005). Limitations to these analyses include spatial resolu- (2001) definition of dry forest neither includes deciduous vegeta- tion, image classification methodology, the tropical dry forest tion in savannas nor Dry Chaco vegetation as part of the distribu- definition used, and also imagery selection procedures that do tion of tropical dry forests. Yet the Llanos savannas, the Beni not account for latitudinal differences in leaf phenology patterns
Load more

Recommended publications
  • World Bank Document
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT 33977 FACILITY Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Quarterly Operational Report April 1995 Public Disclosure Authorized GEF Public Disclosure Authorized development,agencies, national institutions, (GEF) is a financial tions, bilateral T mechanismhe Global Environment that provides Facility grant and concessional funds non-governmental organizations (NGOs), private sector to developing countries for projects and activities that aim entities, and academic institutions. The GEF also comprises to protect the global environment. GEF resources are avail- a Small Grants Programme available for projects in the able for projects and other activities that address climate four focal areas that are put forward by grassroots groups change, loss of biological diversity, pollution of international and NGOs in developing countries. waters, and depletion of the ozone layer. Countries can The Quarterly Operational Report is designed to pro- obtain GEF funds if they are eligible to borrow from the vide a comprehensive review of, and a status report on, the World Bank (IBRD and/or IDA) or receive technical assis- GEE work program. A brief description of each of the GEE's tance grants from UNDP through a country program. projects organized alphabetically by region can be Responsibility for implementing GEF activities is found on pages 8-J8. Each description lists the name of the shared by the United Nations Development Programme UNDP, UNEP or World Bank Task Manager responsible for (UNDP), the United Nations Environment Programme the project. Inquiries about specific projects should be (UNEP) and the World Bank. UNDP is responsible for referred to the responsible Task Manager. Their telephone technical assistance activities, capacity building, and the and fax numbers can be found on pages 63 and 64.
    [Show full text]
  • Forests Warranting Further Consideration As Potential World
    Forest Protected Areas Warranting Further Consideration as Potential WH Forest Sites: Summaries from Various and Thematic Regional Analyses (Compendium produced by Marc Patry, for the proceedings of the 2nd World Heritage Forest meeting, held at Nancy, France, March 11-13, 2005) Four separate initiatives have been carried out in the past 10 years in an effort to help guide the process of identifying and nominating new WH Forest sites. The first, carried out by Thorsell and Sigaty (1997), addresses forests worldwide, and was developed based on the authors’ shared knowledge of protected forests worldwide. The second focuses exclusively on tropical forests and was assembled by the participants at the 1998 WH Forest meeting in Berastagi, Indonesia (CIFOR, 1999). A third initiative consists of potential boreal forest sites developed by the participants to an expert meeting on boreal forests, held in St. Petersberg in 2003. Finally, a fourth, carried out jointly between UNEP and IUCN applied a more systematic approach (IUCN, 2004). Though aiming at narrowing the field of potential candidate sites, these initiatives do not automatically imply that all of the listed forest areas would meet the criteria for inscription on the WH List, and conversely, nor do they imply that any site left off the list would not meet these criteria. Since these lists were developed, several of the proposed sites have been inscribed on the WH List, while others have been the subject of nominations, but were not inscribed, for various reasons. The lists below are reproduced here in an effort to facilitate access to this information and to guide future nomination initiatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Endemism of Woody Plant Species in the Equatorial Pacific Seasonally Dry Forests
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Springer - Publisher Connector Biodivers Conserv (2010) 19:169–185 DOI 10.1007/s10531-009-9713-4 ORIGINAL PAPER Diversity and endemism of woody plant species in the Equatorial Pacific seasonally dry forests Reynaldo Linares-Palomino Æ Lars Peter Kvist Æ Zhofre Aguirre-Mendoza Æ Carlos Gonzales-Inca Received: 7 October 2008 / Accepted: 10 August 2009 / Published online: 16 September 2009 Ó The Author(s) 2009. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract The biodiversity hotspot of the Equatorial Pacific region in western Ecuador and northwestern Peru comprises the most extensive seasonally dry forest formations west of the Andes. Based on a recently assembled checklist of the woody plants occurring in this region, we analysed their geographical and altitudinal distribution patterns. The montane seasonally dry forest region (at an altitude between 1,000 and 1,100 m, and the smallest in terms of area) was outstanding in terms of total species richness and number of endemics. The extensive seasonally dry forest formations in the Ecuadorean and Peruvian lowlands and hills (i.e., forests below 500 m altitude) were comparatively much more species poor. It is remarkable though, that there were so many fewer collections in the Peruvian departments and Ecuadorean provinces with substantial mountainous areas, such as Ca- jamarca and Loja, respectively, indicating that these places have a potentially higher number of species. We estimate that some form of protected area (at country, state or private level) is currently conserving only 5% of the approximately 55,000 km2 of remaining SDF in the region, and many of these areas protect vegetation at altitudes below 500 m altitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Hull) Mphil (Cantab)
    Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy At the University of Leicester By William D. Gosling BSc (Hull) MPhil (Cantab) Department of Geography University of Leicester Submitted: December 2003 Examined: April 2004 © William This thesis is copyright material and no quotation from it may be published without proper UMI Number: U188605 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U188605 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Characterization of Neotropical forest and savannah ecosystems by their modern pollen spectra William D. Gosling Abstract Controversy surrounds the Quaternary palaeoenvironmental history of Amazonia. It is unclear whether moist evergreen forest, savannah or seasonally dry forest dominated the Amazon basin at the last glacial maximum (c. 21,000 years B.P.). In part the uncertainty surrounding the palaeoenvironmental history of Amazonia stems from a poor understanding of the ecological significance of the fossil pollen records from the region. In order to improve interpretations of the fossil pollen record it is essential to better understand the nature of the pollen rain produced by modem ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Forest-Savanna-Grassland Gradients on Bird Communities of Chiquitano Dry Forests Domain, in Western Brazil
    Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências ISSN: 0001-3765 [email protected] Academia Brasileira de Ciências Brasil GODOI, MAURICIO N.; DE SOUZA, EDIVALDO O. The effects of forest-savanna-grassland gradients on bird communities of Chiquitano Dry Forests domain, in western Brazil Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, vol. 88, núm. 3, 2016, pp. 1755-1767 Academia Brasileira de Ciências Rio de Janeiro, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=32748476014 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (2016) 88(3 Suppl.): 1755-1767 (Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences) Printed version ISSN 0001-3765 / Online version ISSN 1678-2690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201620150615 www.scielo.br/aabc The effects of forest-savanna-grassland gradients on bird communities of Chiquitano Dry Forests domain, in western Brazil MAURICIO N. GODOI1 and EDIVALDO O. DE SOUZA2 1Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, s/n, 79070-900 Campo Grande, MS, Brasil 2Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul/UFMS, Campus Universitário de Aquidauana, CPAQ, Avenida Oscar Trindade de Barros, 740, Unidade II, Serraria, 79200-000 Aquidauana, MS, Brasil Manuscript received on August 27, 2015; accepted for publication on December 7, 2015 ABSTRACT Different vegetation types are distributed in mountains according to altitude, topography and soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Zi[ EN BIODIVERSIDAD)? 11I
    _ ---------- -i _l_ - ________ _ _ .. ~~~_._.G=.:_.__ _ _ ._.._,_,___,_____ _,_,o_ssw__ r____I_____.-- ,.................. ,,. 15_ j s - -- ,,.nn......................................... == -- -_: _: . -. - . = -- LO NI~~~- Public Disclosure Authorized CIP)~~ ~ ~~- = I 7 i s s s Public Disclosure Authorized - i, z 2. L ~LLj t1~ t !- (9~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~L Public Disclosure Authorized 0E 0 . _ - . _ _ - . r~ ~ ~ ~ .. Public Disclosure Authorized . I''U' "71111 ;:01i11:Ii 1^/]N: 1 I 1 HO1riON INVESTMENTS: I diversity Funding in H i J the Caribbean I ( Z t rt .I 'I ussell, L. Cornwell and E. Fajer zI[ EN BIODIVERSIDAD)? 11i. lEvwili I liento para la Biodiversidad ri c I 1:i na y el Caribe (: ( Linv c ) 1 Russell, L. Cornwell y E. Fajer 35111 Biodiversity Support Program Washington, DC 'l t 1 DII" World Bank -~W .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~. IA11I.E (! ) iTi NTrs TABLA DE CONTENIDOS Ackrio' v eil I ntsri 5 Reconocimientos 5 Exerut ve r via ryt 7 Resumen Ejecutivo 7 I i -,)du I c- to Introduccion Io 're\ c:l', ( ' w tion Funri v k ;essn mnt 12 Evaluaciones Previas sobre Financiamiento Bloc vn r! j r dme Asscs i 1 i i )r LA 13 para la Conservaci6n 12 Evaluacion del Financiamiento para la Mle t iod i 14 Biodiversidad en LAC 13 Metodos '4 Info nia: ( ^ llected 14 Encuesta 14 IPot( ] la ii m-sof Errot 15 Informacion Recolectada 14 Re5zu Its et id t ssicn 1 Fuentes Potenciales de Error 15 Gen r:il t .I s i6 Resultados y Discusi6n 16 Fun itig 1 nor Type 20 Resultados Generales i6 Funi itig ) r jecl Caategoi 21 Financiamiento por Tipo de Donante 20
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Survey Report of the Llanos Orientales, Colombia. General Report
    FAO/SF: 11/COL L SURVEY OF THE LLANOS ORIENT LE OENERAL FIEPORT fiefNhv UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM *w FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS EXTERNAL TRANSLATION FAO/SF: 11/COL SOIL SURVEY OF THE LLANOS ORIENTALES COLOMBIA VOLUME I GENERAL REPORT FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS UNITED NATIONS SPECIAL FUND Rome, 1965 MR/27262 CONTENTS LISTOF TABLES 0000006400090.001.00 LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF MATS o00000000040o0..0.000009.004.00000000000000900.000o0 INTRODUCTION 00.a.00.0009.0.40060000064001.000900000 Background 9 0 9 0011 9 0 9 The Project and lto Execution . o 2 Project Personnel 9 9 3 Tr ning O 0e .00 4,0,0" 1100 9 3 Acknowledgments 3 SUMMARY OF MAIN CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA 0,10.000m000110000.00000.0400000po* 7 Geography, Location of Survey Area 7 ciimate a 0 0 0 0 0 PO" 9 0 11 VegetatiOn O0000000.4.000004.06"00400QOP0,09.0941000004,04140Opp0 19 Hydrology 00400.11410000000.009080060000000040000009008000O004. 20 Geology, Geomorphology, Landscape Map 23 Agriculture and Livestock 0.0paeo0004.ve0.000000090 35 SOILS AD THEIR USE 40 General 00,900000p 40 Land Capability Classes and Map 42 NEEDFOR RESEARCH 0000.00040.4.000001,044.09."0400WoMes0901,000000.p00 49 LISTOF COLLABORATORS e000m000000*0000000.00090a040%440000090040170.0 54 ENGLISHSUMMARY . onsv011 doonim 00 56 REFERENCES 000900OOM*00.000006008O0.09100000oMOOOR*00000098,000000000.04$ 65 APPENDIX I - PLAN OF OPERATION 67 Budget and Plan of Expenditure - Special Fund Contribution ...o. 77 Budgot and Plan of Expenditure - Government Contribution ....... 78 Amendment 1 of the Plan of Operation 79 - ii - LIST OF TABLES Pago I-1 Calculaticins of actual and potential evaporation and water deficit or surplus at Villavicencio, Meta .........
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH AMERICAN NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS, STATUS of Philip M
    SOUTH AMERICAN NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS, STATUS OF Philip M. Fearnside National Institute for Research in the Amazon (INPA) I. Original Extent of Terrestrial Ecosystems ilar general structure, climatic regimes, major eco- II. Present Extent of Terrestrial Ecosystems logical processes, ͱ diversity, and flora and fauna III. Human Use of Converted Areas with similar guild structures and life histories. IV. Human Use of Remaining Natural Habitats V. Threats to Remaining Natural Habitats VI. Status of Protected Areas VII. Priorities for Conservation THE TERM ECOREGION, as used in this article, refers to ‘‘natural’’ ecological systems, or terrestrial and aquatic areas as they were when Europeans first arrived in the GLOSSARY New World. The original extent of natural ecoregions is presented, grouped by bioregion, major habitat type, bioregion One of six biogeographic divisions of South and major ecosystem type. The definitions of these America consisting of contiguous ecoregions. Biore- terms, given in the Glossary, are taken from Dinerstein gions are delimited to better address the biogeo- et al. (1995); the rating codes are given in the footnotes graphic distinctiveness of ecoregions. to the table. Indications of the extent of remaining ecoregion A geographically distinct assemblage of nat- natural ecosystems, the threats to their continued exis- ural communities that share a large majority of their tence, and the status of protected areas are discussed, species and ecological dynamics, share similar envi- together with priorities for conservation. ronmental conditions, and interact ecologically in ways that are critical for their long-term persistence. ecosystem A set of interacting living and nonliving I. ORIGINAL EXTENT OF components in a defined geographic space.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeography of the Llanos De Moxos Roberto Langstroth Plotkin 183
    MF Geographica Helvetica Jg. 66 2011/Heft 3 Biogeography of the Llanos de Moxos Roberto Langstroth Plotkin 183 Biogeography of the Llanos de Moxos: natural and anthropogenic determinants Roberto Langstroth Plotkin, South Riding Bactris, Ceiba, Coccoloba, Ficus, Genipa, Guarea, Hura, Inga, Maclura, Margaritaria, Salacia, Spondias, Sterculia, Swartzia, Syagrus, Tabebuia, Trichilia, Tripla- 1 Introduction ris, and Vitex (Beck 1983; Langstroth 1996). Prior to the arrival of Europeans in the Americas, the Semialturas are levee backslopes and splays with human inhabitants of the Llanos de Moxos constructed brief, shallow inundations and vegetation contingent diverse earthworks such as mounds and causeways, upon the fire regimes. Semialturas may support largely raised agricultural fields in the savannas and managed deciduous forest or woodland (genera such as Acroco- the landscape using fire and other tools (Denevan mia, Astronium, Coccoloba, Copernicia, Cordia, Cupa- 1966; Langstroth 1996; Lombardo & Prümers 2010; nia, Enterolobium, Geoffroea, Guazuma, Piptadenia, Lombardo et al. 2011). Erickson (2008) considers the Pithecellobium, Randia, Samanea, Sterculia, Tabebuia, Llanos de Moxos to be an example of an Amazonian and Zanthoxylum), Cerrado («campo cerrado» or «domesticated landscape» and, based on evidence «campo sujo», genera listed below), or pampa with from Moxos, claims that «nature in Amazonia more scattered fire tolerant trees Pseudobombax,( Tabe- closely resembles a garden than a pristine, natural buia) and Copernicia palms (Beck 1983; Langstroth wilderness.» These arguments presume that Moxos 1996). Termite mounds are frequent and present small is representative of Amazonia and also discount the woody islands with Celtis, Cereus, Coccoloba, Coper- roles of longer-term physical and biological processes nicia, Cordia, Machaerium, Rhamnidium, and Sorocea in play since the Miocene when extensive non-forest (Beck 1983; Langstroth 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 2: Forests COVER PHOTO CREDITS
    CHAPTER 2: Forests COVER PHOTO CREDITS: Freshwater and pink coral, Eric Mielbrecht Portage glacier icebergs and Steller sea lions, Lynn Rosentrater Grassland and alpine meadow, Jonathan Gelbard BUYING TIME: A USER'S MANUAL 43 CHAPTER 2 Forest Ecosystems Forests Threatened by Climate Change: Promoting Long-term Forest Resilience Jennifer Biringer WWF Global Forest Program CURRENT RATES OF CLIMATIC WARMING are the highest they have been in the last 10,000 years (IPCC, 1996a). Against this backdrop are forests and forest ecosys- tems, which have persisted for hundreds of millions of years. During this time major fluctuations in the climate have caused vegetation to modify their composition, structure and function, or risk extinction. Forests as a biome have tolerated such climatic changes through their ability to migrate, relatively unencumbered, to suitable new habitat. Past changes have also occurred at a much slower pace than those seen today, allowing forests time to adapt. Many of today’s forests, however, have undergone serious frag- mentation and degradation from roads, agriculture and development, and are thus im- peded in their ability to migrate as their local climate changes (Noss, 2000). It is in com- bination with these threats that the impacts of unprecedented rates of climate change can compromise forest resilience, and distribution (IPCC, 2001). The following sections lay out the chief stresses to each of the different forest types from tropical regions to boreal forests, as well as the crucial components of each system that must be maintained for healthy ecosystem functioning. Then evidence of current impacts on each major forest type is reviewed, together with projections of likely future impacts determined from General Circulation Models (GCMs) and other scientific re- search.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Evolution of the Northernmost Andes, Colombia
    Structural Evolution of the Northernmost Andes, Colombia GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 846 Prepared in coopeTation ·with the lnstituto Nacional de Investigaciones Geologico-MineTas under the auspices of the Government of Colombia and the Agency for International Development) United States DepaTtment of State Structural Evolution of the Northernmost Andes, Colombia By EARL M. IRVING GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 846 Prepared in cooperation ·with the lnstituto Nacional de Investigaciones Geologico-Min eras under the auspices of the Government of Colombia and the Agency for International Development) United States Department of State An interpretation of the geologic history of a complex mountain system UNITED STATES GOVERNlVIENT PRINTING OFFICE, vVASHINGTON 1975 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Irving, Earl Montgomery, 1911- Structural evolution of the northernmost Andes, Columbia. (Geological Survey professional paper ; 846) Bibliography: p Includes index. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.16:846 1. Geology-Colombia. 2. Geosynclines----Colombia. I. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Geologico­ Mineras.. II. Title. III. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional paper ; 846. QE239.175 558.61 74-600149 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402- Price $1.30 (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-02553 CONTENTS Page Pasre Abstract ----------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Systems of the Amazon Basin of Peru and Bolivia Clasification and Mapping
    ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS of the Amazon Basin of Peru and Bolivia Clasification and Mapping Ecological Systems of the Amazon Basin of Peru and Bolivia Clasification and Mapping Ecological Systems of the Amazon Basin Peru and Bolivia • Clasification Mapping Published by This publication has been financed by The Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation www.moore.org Ecological Systems of the Amazon Basin of Peru and Bolivia Classification and Mapping Josse, C., G. Navarro, F. Encarnación, A. Tovar, P. Comer, W. Ferreira, F. Rodríguez, J. Saito, J. Sanjurjo, J. Dyson, E. Rubin de Celis, R. Zárate, J. Chang, M. Ahuite, C. Vargas, F. Paredes, W. Castro, J. Maco y F. Reátegui #$# 5.!,- NatureServe is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing the scientific basis for effective conservation action. The Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonía Peruana is an autonomous governmental entity, based in the Amazon Basin of Peru. Its mission is to support the betterment of the local communities’ quality of life by dedicating research to sustainable development and conservation of the natural resources in the Amazon region. The Conservation Data Center in the Facultad de Ciencias Forestales of the Universidad Nacional Agraria la Molina is an information management unity of the #$# 5.!,- biological and ecological information of Peru. The unity keeps records of fauna and flora species as well as diminishing terrestrial and marine environments. Photo Credits Gonzalo Navarro, IIAP, CDC-UNALM, NatureServe, Hugo Arnal, Walter H. Wust Cover Photo Frans Lanting (cover, Tambopata river); Walter H. Wust (back cover, Amiguillo river) Editorial Coordination Cristiane Nascimento Editorial Production Wust Ediciones / www.walterwust.com Translation Ana Maria Piza Printer Gráfica Biblos © NatureServe 2007 ISBN: 0-9711053-7-5 Total or partial use of text permitted with proper citation Citation: Josse, C., G.
    [Show full text]