DOCSLIB.ORG

Predictions of Planets for 586 Exosystems and a Method for Predicting Planets in Multi-Planetary Exosystems Svetlana Beck, Valeri Beck

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Predictions of Planets for 586 Exosystems and a Method for Predicting Planets in Multi-Planetary Exosystems Svetlana Beck, Valeri Beck Predictions of planets for 586 exosystems and a method for predicting planets in multi-planetary exosystems Svetlana Beck, Valeri Beck To cite this version: Svetlana Beck, Valeri Beck. Predictions of planets for 586 exosystems and a method for predicting planets in multi-planetary exosystems. 2019. hal-02024161 HAL Id: hal-02024161 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02024161 Preprint submitted on 18 Feb 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Predictions of planets for 586 exosystems and a method for predicting planets in multi-planetary exosystems Svetlana Beck1, Valeri Beck1* 1Alfa Carbon® Beck, Berlin, Germany ABSTRACT We have applied a model of planetary system formation in the field of a standing sound wave (the ‘SSW-Model’) to the prediction of planets in 586 multi-planetary exosystems (384 bi- planetary, 127 tri-planetary and 75 exosystems with four or more confirmed planets). We have verified our predictions using transit-like events from the NASA Threshold-Crossing Event (TCE) catalogue, finding that more than 80% of these events are included in our list of exoplanet predictions. We describe a method for predicting the periods and semi-major axes of additional planets for exosystems with two or more confirmed planets. Our method can significantly facilitate targeted searches for planets in exosystems, enabling the detection of many new exoplanets, including those located in the habitable zones. KEY WORDS: planets and satellites: detection–planets and satellites: formation–planets and satellites: general–planets and satellites: rings–protoplanetary discs 1. INTRODUCTION In this paper, based on our model for the formation of the Solar System (Beck & Beck 2016; hereafter BB16), we present predictions for exoplanets in multi-planetary exosystems. This model explains very well many facts about, and observations of, our Solar System and exoplanetary systems, which current theories of the origins of planetary systems fail to explain. In our model, planets in the system are arranged in proportion to r4, where r is the distance from the centre of the system. When we applied this distribution to the ‘Trappist-1’ exoplanetary system (Fig. 1), we were astonished by how well the planets in this system are arranged in a straight line on a graph of ∜(an) vs. n, where an is the semi-major axis of the planet with ordinal number n. * E-Mail: [email protected] 1 0.5 TRAPPIST-1 h TRAPPIST-1 g 0.45 TRAPPIST-1 f 0.4 TRAPPIST-1 e TRAPPIST-1 d Fourth root (a) root Fourth 0.35 TRAPPIST-1 c TRAPPIST-1 b 0.3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Figure 1. Distribution of planets in the ‘Trappist-1’ exoplanetary system We have also applied this correlation to other exoplanetary systems with 6–8 confirmed planets from a NASA Exoplanet Archive1. We obtain similar distributions of the planets in straight lines for all of the systems, with one or several gaps between the known planets (Fig. 2). HD 10180 HD 219134 HD 34445 Kepler-11 Kepler-20 Kepler-80 KOI-351 TRAPPIST-1 Fourth root (a) root Fourth 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Figure 2. Distribution of planets in the exoplanetary system with six or more planets In Figs 1 and 2, it is clear that there are definite patterns in the distances of the planets from the centre of the system and that, in many exosystems, one can hypothesise the existence of undiscovered planets between the known ones. 1 https://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu 2 For our Solar System, the so-called Titius–Bode Law (TB relation) has been known for more than 250 years; it describes in one simple mathematical formula the average distances of the planets from the Sun. This relation attracted great attention after the discovery of Uranus and the minor planet Ceres, providing the first instance of successful predictions of previously unknown planets. Boivard and Lineweaver (2013) used a generalised TB relation to predict 141 additional planets in 68 multi-planetary exosystems. Using these predictions, Huang and Bakos (2014) discovered five planetary candidates within the limits of the predicted periods, but they concluded that such a small number of discovered candidates is insufficient to confirm the usefulness of the TB relation to predict new exoplanets. Although the TB relation itself cannot be accepted as being generally applicable to exoplanetary systems, the idea of using the observed patterns in exosystems to predict new planets may be very productive, if there is a ‘correct’ theory or model for the origin of planetary systems. The TB relation does not have any physical foundation; our model, on the contrary, describes the formation of planetary systems from a purely physical standpoint, and although it still lacks a complete mathematical description, it may nevertheless be useful for the practical prediction of new exoplanets in multi-planetary systems. In Section 3, we present our predictions for 586 exosystems, and Section 4 verifies our predictions for a number of systems from the Kepler mission data. Furthermore, all five planetary candidates discovered by Huang and Bakos are present in our predictions. 2. PHYSICAL GROUNDING OF THE MODEL Many researchers (e.g. Loomis et al. 2017; Debes et al. 2013; Williams and Lucas 2011; Avenhaus et al., 2018; Andrews et al. 2016; Churcher et al., 2011; Matthews et al. 2015; Isella et al. 2018; Clarke et al 2018) are working to understand and explain the observed patterns in the distributions of planets in the numerous recently discovered multi-planetary systems. However, they have experienced only minor success, since there is at present no physically sound theory that takes into account most of the known facts. In contrast, our model is a theoretical construction that takes into account, from a purely physical point of view, most of the observational data and currently known facts about the formation and evolution of the Solar System and exoplanetary systems. It is generally accepted that planetary systems are formed as a result of the collapse of a rotating cloud of gas and dust. In the process of contracting, the rotation of the cloud accelerates, and it forms a protoplanetary disk, within which the planets form. But what is a protoplanetary ‘disk’? More than 99% of the initial protoplanetary cloud consists of gas (e.g. Ansdell M. et al. 2016). Due to centrifugal force, the rotating cloud takes the form of an ellipsoid of revolution, but it is prevented from collapsing into a thin, flat disk by gas pressure. Fig. 3 shows some images of protoplanetary disks obtained by the ALMA radio array1. Surprisingly, most appear to be oriented perpendicular to, or with only a slight deviation from 90° relative to, the line of sight from an observer on Earth. If these objects were actually flat disks, then it would appear that the Solar System occupies some favoured position in our galaxy toward which the emerging planetary systems ‘look’. Of course, this cannot be the case. Our model of the formation of a planetary system in the field of a standing sound wave (the SSW-Model) perfectly explains this contradiction. Each ALMA image is in reality the projection of a three-dimensional object onto a plane perpendicular to our line of sight; if such an object is an ellipsoid of revolution (a protoplanetary gas–dust cloud), we will obtain images exactly like those in Fig. 3, i.e. circles or ellipses, regardless of the place from 1 The Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array 3 which we observe the object. Ring-like structures in these images are dust spheres (ellipsoids of revolution) located inside one another that concentrate in the antinodes of the standing wave. We see them as rings because a line of sight near the edge of each sphere crosses a much greater thickness of dust than does one near the centre (see BB16 for more detail). In more evolved gas and dust ellipsoids, the dust has already concentrated largely toward the plane of rotation. Note that ALMA observes mainly dust, or in some cases gases such as CO (e.g. Huang J. et al. (2018), but not hydrogen or helium, which make up the bulk of the protoplanetary cloud. Based on the ALMA images, we conclude that the maximum degree of compression of the gas ellipsoid does not exceed 1:2; to call such a cloud a disk is at the very least incorrect. Figure 3. ALMA’s high-resolution images of nearby protoplanetary disks, which are the results of the Disk Substructures at High Angular Resolution Project (DSHARP). Credit: ALMA (ESO/NAOJ/NRAO), S. Andrews et al.; N. Lira The dust in the original protoplanetary cloud is distributed more or less evenly, and its behaviour is completely determined by the gravitational influence of the much larger mass of gas. The low concentration of dust in the cloud in turn causes a very low rate of adhesion of the dust particles among themselves, so it is problematic to conclude that planets may form in a short time (according to some estimates, 1 million years or even 100 thousand years, e.g. 4 Fedele et al. 2018). Our model assumes a perhaps more realistic timescale of 2–10 million years.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants As Tracers of Planet Formation
    Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants as Tracers of Planet Formation Thesis by Marta Levesque Bryan In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2018 Defended May 1, 2018 ii © 2018 Marta Levesque Bryan ORCID: [0000-0002-6076-5967] All rights reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank Heather Knutson, who I had the great privilege of working with as my thesis advisor. Her encouragement, guidance, and perspective helped me navigate many a challenging problem, and my conversations with her were a consistent source of positivity and learning throughout my time at Caltech. I leave graduate school a better scientist and person for having her as a role model. Heather fostered a wonderfully positive and supportive environment for her students, giving us the space to explore and grow - I could not have asked for a better advisor or research experience. I would also like to thank Konstantin Batygin for enthusiastic and illuminating discussions that always left me more excited to explore the result at hand. Thank you as well to Dimitri Mawet for providing both expertise and contagious optimism for some of my latest direct imaging endeavors. Thank you to the rest of my thesis committee, namely Geoff Blake, Evan Kirby, and Chuck Steidel for their support, helpful conversations, and insightful questions. I am grateful to have had the opportunity to collaborate with Brendan Bowler. His talk at Caltech my second year of graduate school introduced me to an unexpected population of massive wide-separation planetary-mass companions, and lead to a long-running collaboration from which several of my thesis projects were born.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Parameters of the Multiplanet Systems HD 106315 and GJ 9827*†
    The Astronomical Journal, 161:47 (16pp), 2021 January https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/abca39 © 2020. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Physical Parameters of the Multiplanet Systems HD 106315 and GJ 9827*† Molly R. Kosiarek1,35 , David A. Berardo2 , Ian J. M. Crossfield3, Cesar Laguna1,4 , Caroline Piaulet5 , Joseph M. Akana Murphy1,35 , Steve B. Howell6 , Gregory W. Henry7 , Howard Isaacson8,9 , Benjamin Fulton10 , Lauren M. Weiss11 , Erik A. Petigura12 , Aida Behmard13 , Lea A. Hirsch14 , Johanna Teske15, Jennifer A. Burt16 , Sean M. Mills17 , Ashley Chontos18,35 , Teo Močnik19 , Andrew W. Howard17 , Michael Werner16 , John H. Livingston20 , Jessica Krick21 , Charles Beichman22 , Varoujan Gorjian16 , Laura Kreidberg23,24 , Caroline Morley25 , Jessie L. Christiansen21 , Farisa Y. Morales16 , Nicholas J. Scott6 , Jeffrey D. Crane26 , Sharon Xuesong Wang27,28 , Stephen A. Shectman26, Lee J. Rosenthal17 , Samuel K. Grunblatt29,30 , Ryan A. Rubenzahl17,35 , Paul A. Dalba31,36 , Steven Giacalone32 , Chiara Dane Villanueva1,4, Qingtian Liu1,4, Fei Dai13 , Michelle L. Hill31 , Malena Rice33 , Stephen R. Kane31 , and Andrew W. Mayo32,34 1 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Physics, and Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 3 Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Kansas, 1082 Malott,1251 Wescoe Hall Dr., Lawrence, KS 66045, USA 4 Department
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • An Upper Boundary in the Mass-Metallicity Plane of Exo-Neptunes
    MNRAS 000, 1{8 (2016) Preprint 8 November 2018 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 An upper boundary in the mass-metallicity plane of exo-Neptunes Bastien Courcol,1? Fran¸cois Bouchy,1 and Magali Deleuil1 1Aix Marseille University, CNRS, Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille UMR 7326, 13388 Marseille cedex 13, France Accepted XXX. Received YYY; in original form ZZZ ABSTRACT With the progress of detection techniques, the number of low-mass and small-size exo- planets is increasing rapidly. However their characteristics and formation mechanisms are not yet fully understood. The metallicity of the host star is a critical parameter in such processes and can impact the occurence rate or physical properties of these plan- ets. While a frequency-metallicity correlation has been found for giant planets, this is still an ongoing debate for their smaller counterparts. Using the published parameters of a sample of 157 exoplanets lighter than 40 M⊕, we explore the mass-metallicity space of Neptunes and Super-Earths. We show the existence of a maximal mass that increases with metallicity, that also depends on the period of these planets. This seems to favor in situ formation or alternatively a metallicity-driven migration mechanism. It also suggests that the frequency of Neptunes (between 10 and 40 M⊕) is, like giant planets, correlated with the host star metallicity, whereas no correlation is found for Super-Earths (<10 M⊕). Key words: Planetary Systems, planets and satellites: terrestrial planets { Plan- etary Systems, methods: statistical { Astronomical instrumentation, methods, and techniques 1 INTRODUCTION lation was not observed (.e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article in PDF Format
    A&A 562, A92 (2014) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321493 & c ESO 2014 Astrophysics Li depletion in solar analogues with exoplanets Extending the sample, E. Delgado Mena1,G.Israelian2,3, J. I. González Hernández2,3,S.G.Sousa1,2,4, A. Mortier1,4,N.C.Santos1,4, V. Zh. Adibekyan1, J. Fernandes5, R. Rebolo2,3,6,S.Udry7, and M. Mayor7 1 Centro de Astrofísica, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Estrelas, 4150-762 Porto, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] 2 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, C/ Via Lactea s/n, 38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 3 Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, 38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 4 Departamento de Física e Astronomia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal 5 CGUC, Department of Mathematics and Astronomical Observatory, University of Coimbra, 3049 Coimbra, Portugal 6 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, CSIC, Spain 7 Observatoire de Genève, Université de Genève, 51 ch. des Maillettes, 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland Received 18 March 2013 / Accepted 25 November 2013 ABSTRACT Aims. We want to study the effects of the formation of planets and planetary systems on the atmospheric Li abundance of planet host stars. Methods. In this work we present new determinations of lithium abundances for 326 main sequence stars with and without planets in the Teff range 5600–5900 K. The 277 stars come from the HARPS sample, the remaining targets were observed with a variety of high-resolution spectrographs. Results. We confirm significant differences in the Li distribution of solar twins (Teff = T ± 80 K, log g = log g ± 0.2and[Fe/H] = [Fe/H] ±0.2): the full sample of planet host stars (22) shows Li average values lower than “single” stars with no detected planets (60).
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2105.11583V2 [Astro-Ph.EP] 2 Jul 2021 Keck-HIRES, APF-Levy, and Lick-Hamilton Spectrographs
    Draft version July 6, 2021 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 The California Legacy Survey I. A Catalog of 178 Planets from Precision Radial Velocity Monitoring of 719 Nearby Stars over Three Decades Lee J. Rosenthal,1 Benjamin J. Fulton,1, 2 Lea A. Hirsch,3 Howard T. Isaacson,4 Andrew W. Howard,1 Cayla M. Dedrick,5, 6 Ilya A. Sherstyuk,1 Sarah C. Blunt,1, 7 Erik A. Petigura,8 Heather A. Knutson,9 Aida Behmard,9, 7 Ashley Chontos,10, 7 Justin R. Crepp,11 Ian J. M. Crossfield,12 Paul A. Dalba,13, 14 Debra A. Fischer,15 Gregory W. Henry,16 Stephen R. Kane,13 Molly Kosiarek,17, 7 Geoffrey W. Marcy,1, 7 Ryan A. Rubenzahl,1, 7 Lauren M. Weiss,10 and Jason T. Wright18, 19, 20 1Cahill Center for Astronomy & Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 2IPAC-NASA Exoplanet Science Institute, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 3Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 4Department of Astronomy, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 5Cahill Center for Astronomy & Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 6Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, The Pennsylvania State University, 525 Davey Lab, University Park, PA 16802, USA 7NSF Graduate Research Fellow 8Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA 9Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 10Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawai`i,
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0809.1275V2
    How eccentric orbital solutions can hide planetary systems in 2:1 resonant orbits Guillem Anglada-Escud´e1, Mercedes L´opez-Morales1,2, John E. Chambers1 [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT The Doppler technique measures the reflex radial motion of a star induced by the presence of companions and is the most successful method to detect ex- oplanets. If several planets are present, their signals will appear combined in the radial motion of the star, leading to potential misinterpretations of the data. Specifically, two planets in 2:1 resonant orbits can mimic the signal of a sin- gle planet in an eccentric orbit. We quantify the implications of this statistical degeneracy for a representative sample of the reported single exoplanets with available datasets, finding that 1) around 35% percent of the published eccentric one-planet solutions are statistically indistinguishible from planetary systems in 2:1 orbital resonance, 2) another 40% cannot be statistically distinguished from a circular orbital solution and 3) planets with masses comparable to Earth could be hidden in known orbital solutions of eccentric super-Earths and Neptune mass planets. Subject headings: Exoplanets – Orbital dynamics – Planet detection – Doppler method arXiv:0809.1275v2 [astro-ph] 25 Nov 2009 Introduction Most of the +300 exoplanets found to date have been discovered using the Doppler tech- nique, which measures the reflex motion of the host star induced by the planets (Mayor & Queloz 1995; Marcy & Butler 1996). The diverse characteristics of these exoplanets are somewhat surprising. Many of them are similar in mass to Jupiter, but orbit much closer to their 1Carnegie Institution of Washington, Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, 5241 Broad Branch Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2013 BRAS Newsletter
    www.brastro.org June 2013 What's in this issue: PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE .............................................................................................................................. 2 NOTES FROM THE VICE PRESIDENT ........................................................................................................... 3 MESSAGE FROM THE HRPO ...................................................................................................................... 4 OBSERVING NOTES ..................................................................................................................................... 6 MAY ASTRONOMICAL EVENTS .................................................................................................................... 9 PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE Greetings Everyone, Summer is here and with it the humidity and bugs, but I hope that won't stop you from getting out to see some of the great summer time objects in the sky. Also, Saturn is looking quite striking as the rings are now tilted at a nice angle allowing us to see the Casini Division and shadows on and from the planet. Don't miss it! I've been asked by BREC to make sure our club members are all aware of the Park Rules listed on BREC's website. Many of the rules are actually ordinances enacted by the city of Baton Rouge (e.g., No smoking permitted in public areas, No alcohol brought onto or sold on BREC property, No Gambling, No Firearms or Weapons, etc.) Please make sure you observe all of the Park Rules while at the HRPO and provide good examples for the general public. (Many of which are from outside East Baton Rouge Parish and are likely unaware of some of the policies.) For a full list of BREC's Park Rules, you may visit their Park Rules section of their website at http://brec.org/index.cfm/page/555/n/75 I'm sorry I had to miss the outing to LIGO, but it will be good to see some folks again at our meeting on Monday, June 10th.
    [Show full text]
  • Correlations Between the Stellar, Planetary, and Debris Components of Exoplanet Systems Observed by Herschel⋆
    A&A 565, A15 (2014) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323058 & c ESO 2014 Astrophysics Correlations between the stellar, planetary, and debris components of exoplanet systems observed by Herschel J. P. Marshall1,2, A. Moro-Martín3,4, C. Eiroa1, G. Kennedy5,A.Mora6, B. Sibthorpe7, J.-F. Lestrade8, J. Maldonado1,9, J. Sanz-Forcada10,M.C.Wyatt5,B.Matthews11,12,J.Horner2,13,14, B. Montesinos10,G.Bryden15, C. del Burgo16,J.S.Greaves17,R.J.Ivison18,19, G. Meeus1, G. Olofsson20, G. L. Pilbratt21, and G. J. White22,23 (Affiliations can be found after the references) Received 15 November 2013 / Accepted 6 March 2014 ABSTRACT Context. Stars form surrounded by gas- and dust-rich protoplanetary discs. Generally, these discs dissipate over a few (3–10) Myr, leaving a faint tenuous debris disc composed of second-generation dust produced by the attrition of larger bodies formed in the protoplanetary disc. Giant planets detected in radial velocity and transit surveys of main-sequence stars also form within the protoplanetary disc, whilst super-Earths now detectable may form once the gas has dissipated. Our own solar system, with its eight planets and two debris belts, is a prime example of an end state of this process. Aims. The Herschel DEBRIS, DUNES, and GT programmes observed 37 exoplanet host stars within 25 pc at 70, 100, and 160 μm with the sensitiv- ity to detect far-infrared excess emission at flux density levels only an order of magnitude greater than that of the solar system’s Edgeworth-Kuiper belt. Here we present an analysis of that sample, using it to more accurately determine the (possible) level of dust emission from these exoplanet host stars and thereafter determine the links between the various components of these exoplanetary systems through statistical analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Exoplanet.Eu Catalog Page 1 # Name Mass Star Name
    exoplanet.eu_catalog # name mass star_name star_distance star_mass OGLE-2016-BLG-1469L b 13.6 OGLE-2016-BLG-1469L 4500.0 0.048 11 Com b 19.4 11 Com 110.6 2.7 11 Oph b 21 11 Oph 145.0 0.0162 11 UMi b 10.5 11 UMi 119.5 1.8 14 And b 5.33 14 And 76.4 2.2 14 Her b 4.64 14 Her 18.1 0.9 16 Cyg B b 1.68 16 Cyg B 21.4 1.01 18 Del b 10.3 18 Del 73.1 2.3 1RXS 1609 b 14 1RXS1609 145.0 0.73 1SWASP J1407 b 20 1SWASP J1407 133.0 0.9 24 Sex b 1.99 24 Sex 74.8 1.54 24 Sex c 0.86 24 Sex 74.8 1.54 2M 0103-55 (AB) b 13 2M 0103-55 (AB) 47.2 0.4 2M 0122-24 b 20 2M 0122-24 36.0 0.4 2M 0219-39 b 13.9 2M 0219-39 39.4 0.11 2M 0441+23 b 7.5 2M 0441+23 140.0 0.02 2M 0746+20 b 30 2M 0746+20 12.2 0.12 2M 1207-39 24 2M 1207-39 52.4 0.025 2M 1207-39 b 4 2M 1207-39 52.4 0.025 2M 1938+46 b 1.9 2M 1938+46 0.6 2M 2140+16 b 20 2M 2140+16 25.0 0.08 2M 2206-20 b 30 2M 2206-20 26.7 0.13 2M 2236+4751 b 12.5 2M 2236+4751 63.0 0.6 2M J2126-81 b 13.3 TYC 9486-927-1 24.8 0.4 2MASS J11193254 AB 3.7 2MASS J11193254 AB 2MASS J1450-7841 A 40 2MASS J1450-7841 A 75.0 0.04 2MASS J1450-7841 B 40 2MASS J1450-7841 B 75.0 0.04 2MASS J2250+2325 b 30 2MASS J2250+2325 41.5 30 Ari B b 9.88 30 Ari B 39.4 1.22 38 Vir b 4.51 38 Vir 1.18 4 Uma b 7.1 4 Uma 78.5 1.234 42 Dra b 3.88 42 Dra 97.3 0.98 47 Uma b 2.53 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 47 Uma c 0.54 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 47 Uma d 1.64 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 51 Eri b 9.1 51 Eri 29.4 1.75 51 Peg b 0.47 51 Peg 14.7 1.11 55 Cnc b 0.84 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc c 0.1784 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc d 3.86 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc e 0.02547 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc f 0.1479 55
    [Show full text]
  • The Spitzer Search for the Transits of HARPS Low-Mass Planets II
    A&A 601, A117 (2017) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629270 & c ESO 2017 Astrophysics The Spitzer search for the transits of HARPS low-mass planets II. Null results for 19 planets? M. Gillon1, B.-O. Demory2; 3, C. Lovis4, D. Deming5, D. Ehrenreich4, G. Lo Curto6, M. Mayor4, F. Pepe4, D. Queloz3; 4, S. Seager7, D. Ségransan4, and S. Udry4 1 Space sciences, Technologies and Astrophysics Research (STAR) Institute, Université de Liège, Allée du 6 Août 17, Bat. B5C, 4000 Liège, Belgium e-mail: [email protected] 2 University of Bern, Center for Space and Habitability, Sidlerstrasse 5, 3012 Bern, Switzerland 3 Cavendish Laboratory, J. J. Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK 4 Observatoire de Genève, Université de Genève, 51 Chemin des Maillettes, 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland 5 Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-2421, USA 6 European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, 85478 Garching bei München, Germany 7 Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA Received 8 July 2016 / Accepted 15 December 2016 ABSTRACT Short-period super-Earths and Neptunes are now known to be very frequent around solar-type stars. Improving our understanding of these mysterious planets requires the detection of a significant sample of objects suitable for detailed characterization. Searching for the transits of the low-mass planets detected by Doppler surveys is a straightforward way to achieve this goal. Indeed, Doppler surveys target the most nearby main-sequence stars, they regularly detect close-in low-mass planets with significant transit probability, and their radial velocity data constrain strongly the ephemeris of possible transits.
    [Show full text]
  • What Can the Dispersed Matter Planet Project Do for ARIEL?
    What can the Dispersed Matter Planet Project do for ARIEL? Carole Haswell, The Open University Principal Collaborators: Dan Staab, John Barnes, Luca Fossati, MarK Jones, GuilleM Angelada-Escude, JaMes Doherty, Joe Cooper, JaMes Jenkins Outline • motivation: WASP-12: stellar activity masked by planetary mass loss new way to select host stars of ablating planets • Dispersed Matter Planet Project (DMPP) Search for Them among BRIGHT NEARBY STARS! Very efficient RV planet search 39 initial targets, good success rate • First discoveries DMPP-1, DMPP-2, DMPP-3 … • Characterisation of DMPP planets mass-radius-composition relationships, exogeology • DMPP systems good for characterisation even if not transiting… Activity: characterised by RHK Line core Emission strength Fossati, Ayres, Haswell, Bohlender, Kochukhov & Floer 2013, ApJLett Ca II H& K line cores Activity: characterised by RHK Line core emission quenched by diffuse gas Dan Staab PhD work Haswell, Staab, Barnes, Anglada-Escude, Fossati, Jenkins, Norton, Doherty, Cooper 2019, Nature Astronomy arXiv:1912.10874 Activity: characterised by RHK > 40% of close-in planet hosts: depressed CaII H&K OU-SALT survey Doherty, Haswell, Barnes, Staab, Fossati 2018, Poster Cool Stars 20; 2019 in prep Staab, Haswell, Smith, Fossati, Barnes, Busuttil, Jenkins, MNRAS, 2017, 466, 738 Absorbing gas constrained to orbital plane? Haswell, Fossati, Ayres, France, Froning et al 2012, ApJ, 760, 79 Mass-losing Close-in planets e.g. Kepler 1520b have HUGE sCale-heights KIC 1255b aka Kepler 1520b: • DeteCted by transiting
    [Show full text]