DOCSLIB.ORG

May 2019 Or 202.559.4440 Ext. 197 Or 571-982-8858

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
May 2019 Or 202.559.4440 Ext. 197 Or 571-982-8858 FINAL RESEARCH REPORT: LIVING CONDITIONS OF FAMILIES IN PRIVATIZED MILITARY HOUSING MAY 2019 FOR MEDIA INQUIRIES, CONTACT: [email protected] OR 202.559.4440 EXT. 197 OR 571-982-8858 RESEARCH TEAM: Primary investigator: Shelley Kimball, Ph.D., senior director of research and program evaluation With research assistance from: Shannon Razsadin, executive director Jennifer Hurwitz, Ph.D., deputy director of research and program evaluation Cynthia Terry, research analyst SPONSORS: This final report would not be possible without the generous support of Wells Fargo, Craig Newmark Philanthropies, and Reingold, Inc. MFAN Privatized Military Housing Final Report May 2019, p. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 8 METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 DATA ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 RESULTS .................................................................................................................................................................... 13 DEMOGRAPHICS ....................................................................................................................................................... 13 SATISFACTION RATES ............................................................................................................................................... 13 NEUTRAL DEFINED ................................................................................................................................................... 14 SATISFACTION RATES BY HOUSING COMPANY .......................................................................................................... 14 SATISFACTION RATES BY MOST POPULATED INSTALLATIONS ................................................................................... 15 SATISFACTION RATES IN MOST POPULATED INSTALLATIONS .................................................................................... 15 SATISFACTION RATES BY RANK ................................................................................................................................ 16 MANIFEST EFFECT SIZES .................................................................................................................................... 16 DEFINITIONS OF THEMES ................................................................................................................................... 17 MANIFEST EFFECT SIZES BY ISSUE ................................................................................................................. 42 MANIFEST EFFECT SIZES BY LOCATION ...................................................................................................... 44 CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................................................................... 44 APPENDIX A ............................................................................................................................................................. 46 PRIVATIZED MILITARY HOUSING QUESTIONNAIRE ............................................................................................. 46 APPENDIX B: ............................................................................................................................................................ 48 FAMILY PROFILES .................................................................................................................................................. 48 APPENDIX C: ............................................................................................................................................................ 57 HOUSING COMPANIES AND RESPONSE RATE ........................................................................................................ 57 APPENDIX D: ............................................................................................................................................................ 58 RESPONSES AND AVERAGE SATISFACTION RATE BY LOCATION ......................................................................... 58 APPENDIX E: ............................................................................................................................................................ 63 MANIFEST EFFECT SIZES BY LIKERT SCALE RESPONSE ...................................................................................... 63 APPENDIX F: ............................................................................................................................................................ 67 MANIFEST EFFECT SIZES BY LOCATION ............................................................................................................... 67 Alabama: ............................................................................................................................................................ 67 Fort Rucker ........................................................................................................................................................................ 67 Maxwell Gunter Air Force Base ....................................................................................................................................... 68 Redstone Arsenal ............................................................................................................................................................... 69 Alaska ................................................................................................................................................................. 69 Eielson Air Force Base ...................................................................................................................................................... 69 Fort Wainwright ................................................................................................................................................................ 70 Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson ..................................................................................................................................... 70 Arkansas ............................................................................................................................................................. 71 Little Rock Air Force Base ................................................................................................................................................ 71 Arizona ................................................................................................................................................................ 72 Davis-Monthan Air Force Base ......................................................................................................................................... 72 Fort Huachuca ................................................................................................................................................................... 73 MFAN Privatized Military Housing Final Report May 2019, p. 3 Luke Air Force Base .......................................................................................................................................................... 74 Yuma ................................................................................................................................................................................. 75 California ............................................................................................................................................................ 75 Camp Parks ........................................................................................................................................................................ 75 Marine Corps Air Station Camp Pendleton ....................................................................................................................... 75 Beale Air Force Base ......................................................................................................................................................... 76 Edwards Air Force Base .................................................................................................................................................... 77 Fort Irwin National Training Center ................................................................................................................................. 78 Naval Air Station Lemoore ............................................................................................................................................... 79 Los Angeles Air Force Base .............................................................................................................................................. 80 Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center, Twenty Nine Palms ...................................................................................... 81 Marine Corps Air Station Miramar ................................................................................................................................... 82 Marine Corps Mountain Warfare Training Center ...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 11, folder “Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 11 of The John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON October 31, 197 5 MEMORANDUM TO: JACK MARSH FROM: RUSS ROURKE I discussed the Ft. Dix situation with Rep. Ed Forsythe again. As you may know, I reviewed the matter with Marty Hoffman at noon yesterday, and with Col. Kenneth Bailey several days ago. Actually, I exchanged intelligence information with him. Hoffman and Bailey advised me that no firm decision has as yet been made with regard to the retention of the training function at Dix. On Novem­ ber 5, Marty Hotfman will receive a briefing by Army staff on pos­ sible "back fill'' organizations that may be available to go to Dix in the event the training function moves out.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
    CALIFORNIA HISTORIC MILITARY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY VOLUME II: THE HISTORY AND HISTORIC RESOURCES OF THE MILITARY IN CALIFORNIA, 1769-1989 by Stephen D. Mikesell Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Prepared by: JRP JRP HISTORICAL CONSULTING SERVICES Davis, California 95616 March 2000 California llistoric Military Buildings and Stnictures Inventory, Volume II CONTENTS CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... i FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. iv PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1-1 2.0 COLONIAL ERA (1769-1846) .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Spanish-Mexican Era Buildings Owned by the Military ............................................... 2-8 2.2 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Linkages Study 2015
    Florida’s Military Installations Linkages Study conducted by The Principi Group and The SPECTRUM Group Team for the Florida Defense Support Task Force February 10, 2015 Florida’s Military Installations Linkages Study Table of Contents Executive Summary…………………………………………………4 Introduction……………….…………………………………………10 Scope of Study………….…………………………………………..10 Methodology……….………………………………………………..11 Analysis…………………………………………………….………..13 Intrastate Linkages…..………………………………………….…14 Interstate Linkages…………………………………………….…..31 Conclusions………….………….…………………………………..54 Recommendations………………………..………………….…….56 Navy Installation Linkages…………………………………...…..58 Air Force Installation Linkages……..………………………...…67 Team Orlando/National Simulation Center Linkages………..83 Coast Guard Linkages…………………………………………….88 National Guard Linkages…………………………………..……102 2 Florida’s Military Installations Linkages Study List of Figures Figure 1. Florida’s Major Military Installations and Ranges………………………….14 Figure 2. Key Command and Control Linkages in Florida……………………………15 Figure 3. Key Command and Control Linkages in South Florida…...………………16 Figure 4. Key Command and Control Linkages in Northeast Florida………………16 Figure 5. Key Command and Control Linkages in Northwest Florida……………...17 Figure 6. Key Communication Support Linkages in Florida…………………………18 Figure 7. Key Communications Support Linkages in Northwest Florida………….18 Figure 8. Key Training Linkages in Florida……………………………………………...20 Figure 9. Key Training Linkages in South Florida……………………………………...20 Figure 10. Key Training Linkages
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • California State Parks
    1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 Pelican SB Designated Wildlife/Nature Viewing Designated Wildlife/Nature Viewing Visit Historical/Cultural Sites Visit Historical/Cultural Sites Smith River Off Highway Vehicle Use Off Highway Vehicle Use Equestrian Camp Site(s) Non-Motorized Boating Equestrian Camp Site(s) Non-Motorized Boating ( Tolowa Dunes SP C Educational Programs Educational Programs Wind Surfing/Surfing Wind Surfing/Surfing lo RV Sites w/Hookups RV Sites w/Hookups Gasquet 199 s Marina/Boat Ramp Motorized Boating Marina/Boat Ramp Motorized Boating A 101 ed Horseback Riding Horseback Riding Lake Earl RV Dump Station Mountain Biking RV Dump Station Mountain Biking r i S v e n m i t h R i Rustic Cabins Rustic Cabins w Visitor Center Food Service Visitor Center Food Service Camp Site(s) Snow Sports Camp Site(s) Geocaching Snow Sports Crescent City i Picnic Area Camp Store Geocaching Picnic Area Camp Store Jedediah Smith Redwoods n Restrooms RV Access Swimming Restrooms RV Access Swimming t Hilt S r e Seiad ShowersMuseum ShowersMuseum e r California Lodging California Lodging SP v ) l Klamath Iron Fishing Fishing F i i Horse Beach Hiking Beach Hiking o a Valley Gate r R r River k T Happy Creek Res. Copco Del Norte Coast Redwoods SP h r t i t e s Lake State Parks State Parks · S m Camp v e 96 i r Hornbrook R C h c Meiss Dorris PARKS FACILITIES ACTIVITIES PARKS FACILITIES ACTIVITIES t i Scott Bar f OREGON i Requa a Lake Tulelake c Admiral William Standley SRA, G2 • • (707) 247-3318 Indian Grinding Rock SHP, K7 • • • • • • • • • • • (209) 296-7488 Klamath m a P Lower CALIFORNIA Redwood K l a Yreka 5 Tule Ahjumawi Lava Springs SP, D7 • • • • • • • • • (530) 335-2777 Jack London SHP, J2 • • • • • • • • • • • • (707) 938-5216 l K Sc Macdoel Klamath a o tt Montague Lake A I m R National iv Lake Albany SMR, K3 • • • • • • (888) 327-2757 Jedediah Smith Redwoods SP, A2 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • (707) 458-3018 e S Mount a r Park h I4 E2 t 3 Newell Anderson Marsh SHP, • • • • • • (707) 994-0688 John B.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Sexual Assault Court-Martial Summaries 2010 March 2015
    Air Force Sexual Assault Court-Martial Summaries 2010 March 2015 – The Air Force is committed to preventing, deterring, and prosecuting sexual assault in its ranks. This report contains a synopsis of sexual assault cases taken to trial by court-martial. The information contained herein is a matter of public record. This is the final report of this nature the Air Force will produce. All results of general and special courts-martial for trials occurring after 1 April 2015 will be available on the Air Force’s Court-Martial Docket Website (www.afjag.af.mil/docket/index.asp). SIGNIFICANT AIR FORCE SEXUAL ASSAULT CASE SUMMARIES 2010 – March 2015 Note: This report lists cases involving a conviction for a sexual assault offense committed against an adult and also includes cases where a sexual assault offense against an adult was charged and the member was either acquitted of a sexual assault offense or the sexual assault offense was dismissed, but the member was convicted of another offense involving a victim. The Air Force publishes these cases for deterrence purposes. Sex offender registration requirements are governed by Department of Defense policy in compliance with federal and state sex offender registration requirements. Not all convictions included in this report require sex offender registration. Beginning with July 2014 cases, this report also indicates when a victim was represented by a Special Victims’ Counsel. Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, sexual assaults against those 16 years of age and older are charged as crimes against adults. The appropriate disposition of sexual assault allegations and investigations may not always include referral to trial by court-martial.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Aviation Graveyard: New Aerial Images Show Hundreds of Planes Left to Die Across the American Deserts | Daily Mail Online
    7/23/2015 The great aviation graveyard: New aerial images show hundreds of planes left to die across the American deserts | Daily Mail Online Feedback Like 2.8m Follow @MailOnline DailyMail Thursday, Jul 23rd 2015 8AM 68°F 11AM 78°F 5­Day Forecast Home U.K. News Sports U.S. Showbiz Australia Femail Health Science Money Video Travel Columnists Latest Headlines Science Pictures Login YOU MIGHT LIKE Sponsored Links by Taboola A Rising Middle Class: Investment Opportunity? Read Our Report. Prudential The 5 Best Credit Cards with No Interest to Help You Get out of Debt Quicker NextAdvisor See What These Everyday Objects Look Like Cut In Half. Awesome PopFotos 12 Enormous Dogs Who Are Actually Just Big Babies Refinery29 Why Living Life Cooped Up In Your Comfort Zone Is Killing You Elite Daily 20 Photos That Will Make You Want Summer Right This Minute Elite Daily The great aviation graveyard: New aerial images show hundreds of planes left to die across the American deserts Aerial imagery taken from the U.S Navy, U.S Air Force and Google Maps show retired airplane 'boneyards' in Arizona, California and New Mexico The planes are stored in the dry conditions of the desert to stop them rusting in the hope that some may fly again whereas others are used for spare parts Large commercial planes including Boeing, McDonnell Douglas, Lockheed and Airbus aircraft are all pictured By VICTORIA WOOLLASTON PUBLISHED: 07:08 EST, 6 June 2013 | UPDATED: 15:58 EST, 6 June 2013 105 View comments Eerie photos have emerged of hundreds of retired aircraft parked in rows and set formations in aviation graveyards across America.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Air Force Materiel Command Reorganization Report for Congress
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and EDUCATION AND THE ARTS decisionmaking through research and analysis. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from www.rand.org as a public service INFRASTRUCTURE AND of the RAND Corporation. TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY Support RAND SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Purchase this document TERRORISM AND Browse Reports & Bookstore HOMELAND SECURITY Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Project AIR FORCE View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Research Report Assessment of the Air Force Materiel Command Reorganization Report for Congress Don Snyder, Bernard Fox, Kristin F.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices Study 2014
    Military Installation and Mission Support Best Practices (25 States / 20 Communities) Prepared for: Florida Defense Support Task Force (FDSTF) Submitted: December 23, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... iii BEST PRACTICES REPORT Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 1 States/ Communities ........................................................................................................... 1 Project Participants ............................................................................................................. 2 Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 2 Sources ................................................................................................................................ 3 Findings ............................................................................................................................... 4 STATES 1. Florida .............................................................................................................................. 18 2. Alabama ............................................................................................................................ 26 3. Alaska ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Readiness at Risk
    February 2013/$5 Readiness at Risk Living Boneyard Air Dominance Lessons From WWII, Korea, and Vietnam Unconventional. Undetectable. Undeniable. The F-35A Lightning II delivers the 21st century capabilities U.S. and thE F-35 lightning ii tEAM allied forces need. An innovative combination of stealth, speed, NORTHROP GRUMMAN f-35 and cutting-edge sensors allows it to fly through or slip past BAE SYSTEMS lightning ii advanced air defenses, virtually undetected. Superior battlespace PRATT & WHITNEY awareness leaves the enemy nowhere to hide. And that gives lOCKhEED MARtin pilots unprecedented power to engage the target and return home. The F-35A Lightning II. Rising to the challenges of the 21st century. See it in action – F35.com. 301-64993_F35_Unconventional_AFM.indd 1 10/4/12 5:04 PM February 2013, Vol. 96, No. 2 Publisher Craig R. McKinley Editor in Chief Adam J. Hebert Editorial [email protected] Editor Suzann Chapman Executive Editors Michael Sirak John A. Tirpak Senior Editors Amy McCullough 26 Marc V. Schanz FEATURES Associate Editor Aaron M. U. Church 4 Editorial: The Perils of Air Parity By Adam J. Hebert Contributors USAF must preserve readiness, keep Walter J. Boyne, Jack Broughton, John modernization on track, and retain top- T. Correll, Robert S. Dudney, Rebecca notch airmen as funds decline. Grant, Peter Grier, Richard P. Hallion, Marina Malenic 26 Sharpening the Nuclear Sword By Aaron M. U. Church Production [email protected] Air Force Global Strike Command’s Managing Editor bombers and missile forces are at an Juliette Kelsey Chagnon increasing level of readiness. Assistant Managing Editor 32 Living Boneyard Frances McKenney By John A.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profile - 1 the World‟S Largest Open-Pit Borax Mine Is Still Operational Today
    About the City of Lancaster Incorporated in 1977, Lancaster has grown significantly in size and diversity over the last 37 years. With business-friendly policies, the City today attracts global and local companies in many businesses and industries as well as families pursuing the American Dream of homeownership in a close-knit community. Throughout its recent growth, Lancaster has retained a family-focused hometown spirit. Thousands of visitors come to Lancaster in the spring to enjoy our beautiful orange poppy fields amongst the world famous Joshua trees. The movie industry has captured the essence of the high desert in multitudes of movies shot here each year, bringing many additional visitors to patronize our hotels and retail establishments. Lancaster is comprised of 94 square miles with residential communities, recreation and art venues, hi-tech industry, and retail businesses. It is an exciting atmosphere for living and a place of limitless opportunity for business. The City is situated on the north side of Los Angeles County, about 70 miles from downtown Los Angeles. It is bordered by unincorporated Los Angeles County and the city of Palmdale. Lancaster is served by state route 14 and by two major grade-separated east-west thoroughfares: Avenue H and Avenue L. History Following the completion of the Southern Pacific Railroad in 1867, Lancaster was established as a water stop along the route. In 1898, gold was discovered in the hills north of Lancaster and attracted many prospectors to the area. Some of the mines can still be seen and are still operational. Also in 1890, borax was found in what is now known as Boron, just to the northeast of Lancaster.
    [Show full text]
  • 70 FLRA No. 70 Decisions of the Federal Labor Relations Authority 327
    70 FLRA No. 70 Decisions of the Federal Labor Relations Authority 327 70 FLRA No. 70 law or policy that warrants reconsideration. Further, the Authority’s Regulations gave the RD discretion not to U.S. DEPARTMENT hold a hearing, and the Agency does not establish that the OF THE AIR FORCE RD erred in exercising that discretion. Thus, the answer AIR FORCE MATERIEL COMMAND to the second question is also no. WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, OHIO (Agency/Petitioner) II. Background and RD’s Decision and The Union represents a nationwide consolidated bargaining unit of approximately 35,000 Air Force AMERICAN FEDERATION employees (the consolidated unit). As relevant here, OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO within the consolidated unit are a professional unit and a (Union) nonprofessional unit, and both of those units include Hurlburt employees and employees working at Eglin Air AT-RP-17-0007 Force Base (Eglin employees). The Hurlburt employees are part of the Air Force Special Operations Command _____ (Special Command), whereas the Eglin employees are part of the Air Force Materiel Command ORDER DENYING (Materiel Command). APPLICATION FOR REVIEW In 2011, in U.S. Department of the Air Force, November 9, 2017 Air Force Materiel Command, Eglin Air Force Base, Hurlburt Field, Florida (Air Force),1 the Authority _____ denied a petition by the Agency to clarify the consolidated unit by excluding the Hurlburt employees. Before the Authority: Patrick Pizzella, Acting Chairman, Since then, the Materiel Command was substantially and Ernest DuBester, Member reorganized. In addition, the Air Force realigned certain installations so that they no longer report to the I.
    [Show full text]