DOCSLIB.ORG

Hargrove, Thomas H. (Compiler)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hargrove, Thomas H. (Compiler) r-I- Q ::. I \,...II I Hargrove, Thomas H. (compiler) 1980 A guide to research papers in the archaeology of North Carolina on file with the Archaeology Branch of the North Carolina Division of Archives and History. North Carolina Archaeological Council, Publication 13. R.I'. STEPHEN DAVIS, Jr. A GUIDE TO RESEARCH PAPERS IN THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF NORTH. CAROLINA ON FILE WITH THE ARCHAEOLOGY BRANCH OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY Thomas H. Hargrove Compiler NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL COUNCIL PUBLICATION NUMBER 13 Published Jointly by the North Carolina Archaeological Council and the Archaeology Branch Division of Archives and History North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources Raleigh, 1980 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 AUTHOR INDEX 5 COUNTY INDEX 93 CONTRIBUTING INSTITUTIONS 101 ii Introduction For over twenty years, the state agency known as the North Carolina Division of Archives and History has either sponsored or reviewed archaeological work throughout North Carolina. Both sponsored research and review work have resulted in the gradual accumulation of a large number of unpublished manuscripts and limited-circulation reports, now on file with the division's Archaeology Branch. Additional archaeological reports such as dissertations and theses have been added from time to time to aid in state-supported surveys, excavations, and reviews. The growth of this file of information has been especially rapid since the increase of archaeological work carried out for the purpose of compliance with laws governing the environmental impacts of government-supported or regulated projects. Each month the Archaeology Branch receives an average of six reports on the archaeological impacts of ground-disturbing activities. These reports represent a wide variety of research interests, survey styles, analytical techniques, and formats. They range from major river basin studies covering several counties to reports of surveys on one-acre plots of land. Many of the smaller surveys report no sites and include minimal information on the culture histories or environments of the areas involved; many of the larger-scale studies include extensive inventories 2 of archaeological and historical properties as well as efforts at synthesizing local culture histories, extrapolating settle­ ment patterns, or outlining environmental features for studies of cultural ecology. The Guide to Resea~ch Pape~s in the A~chaeology of No~th Ca~olina on File with the A~chaeology Branch of the No~th Ca~olina Division of A~chives and History has been compiled to provide a comprehensive list of these papers to those practicing archaeology in North Carolina. Most of the papers listed in this volume have never been published or have appeared as technical publications with limited distri­ butions. Since this guide is devoted to largely uncirculated archaeological reports, it omits most of the references to more available, published works on archaeology and ethnohistory in North Carolina which are cited in previously published biblio­ graphies (e.g., Phelps 1974; Murdock and O'Leary 1975; Rouse and Goggin 1947; Stevenson 1975; Moeller and Reid 1977). No attempt was made to duplicate the entries in these bibliographies, although some overlapping has occurred. In each citation the editor has attempted to include the name of the institution or agency that performed the work de­ scribed in the report. When a performing agency is not listed in the report, the sponsoring or contracting agency (if known) is listed in its place. This reference is intended to supply the researcher with the information needed to contact directly the individuals or the institutions that have on file not only the manuscript cited, but also (presumably) the notes, photographs, and artifacts produced by the project in question. In most cases a researcher interested in past work in a particular area will not need to refer to the Archaeology Branch files. This bibliography uses the format prescribed by Amenca'l Antiquity (Style Guide for Amencan Antiquity 1979). The body of the list has been arranged alphabetically by the first author listed in the report, or by principal investigator or sponsor­ ing institution if no author was listed on the Archaeology Branch copy. An index of works arranged by county follows the author index. The numbers listed next to each county refer to the numbers found to the right of each title in the author index. Style variants such as the spellings =cheology and =chaeology have been maintained. To prevent redundancy, the addresses of most of the contributing organizations have been abbreviated in individual entries. A list of these organizations appears in the appendix. Where report titles do not mention the North Carolina counties involved, county names have been added in brackets. 3 \ Moeller, Roger W., and John Reid 1977 Archaeological bibliography for eastern North America. Eastern States Archeological Federa­ tion and the American Indian Archaeological Institute, Washington, Connecticut. Murdock, George Peter, and Timothy J. O'Leary 1975 Ethnographic bibliogra~hy of North America (Vol. 4). Human Relat10ns Area Files Press, New Haven, Connecticut. Phelps, David Sutton 1974 Anthropological bibliography of North Carolina. North Carolina Archaeological Council, Publica­ tion 1. Rouse, Irving, and John M. Goggin 1947 An anthropological bibliography of the Eastern Seaboard. Eastern States Archeological Federa­ tion, Research Publication 1. Stevenson, George, Jr. 1975 North Carolina local history: a select biblio­ graphy. North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, Division of Archives and History, Archives Information Circular 8. Style Guide for American Antiquity 1979 American Antiquity 44(1): 193-205. Author Index Abert, S. T. 1879 Survey of the Dan River between Danbury, 1 North Carolina, and Danville, Virginia [Rockingham and Stokes counties]. United States Engineers Office, Washington, D.C. Archeology and Historic Preservation Section 1976 Preliminary analysis: historical and cul­ 2 tural values, Bennetts and Sarem creeks [Gates County]. Ms. on file, Archeology Branch. Archeology and Historic Preservation Section 1977 Preliminary cultural resources assessment: 3 proposed Mount Mitchell National Park [Buncombe, McDowell, Madison, Mitchell, and Y~ncey counties]. Ms. on file, Arche­ ology Branch. 6 Autry, William 0., Jr. 1975 The Eno: an ethnohistorical glimpse of 4 a central North Carolina tribe in the ­ late seventeenth century. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American so­ ciety for Ethnohistory, Gainesville, Florida. 1976 An archaeological assessment of the re­ 5 location of state roads 1008 and 1715 in the B. Everett Jordan reservoir [Chatham County], North Carolina. Ms. on file, u.s. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District. Ayers, Harvard G. 1965 An appraisal of the archeological re­ 6 sources of the Blue Ridge project, Grayson County, Virginia, and Alleghany and Ashe" counties, North Carolina. River "Basin " Surveys, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 1976 An archaeological reconnaissance survey of 7 two proposed construction projects of the city of Andrews [Cherokee County], North Carolina. Ms. on file, Department of Anthropology, Appalachian State University. 1976 Survey and test excavation of a proposed 8 water supply system for the city of Rob­ binsville, Graham County, North Carolina. Ms. on file, Department of Anthropology, Appalachian State University. 1977 Examination of 31Wt267, the proposed build­ 9 ing site of a fire department for Beaver Darn community, watauga County. Ms. on file, Department of Anthropology, Appala­ chian State University. 1977 Preliminary archeological test excavations 10 of four sites located within the limits of the proposed sewage prQjectof the town of Banner Elk [Avery County], North Carolina. Ms. on file, Department of Anthropology, Appalachian State University. 7 Ayers, Harvard G. (Continued) 1978 Archeological reconnaissance survey of 11 the Hominy Valley interceptor sewer project and the South Buncombe inter­ ceptor project, Buncombe and Henderson counties, North Carolina. Ms. on file, Department of Anthropology, Appalachian State University. 1978 Archeological reconnaissance survey of 12 two proposed sewer lines near Cherryville [Gaston County], North Carolina. Ms. on file, Department of Anthropology, Appala­ chian State University. 1978 Preliminary archeological investigations 13 of sixteen drill sites located in the Pisgah National Forest of Burke and Avery counties, North Carolina. Ms. on file, Department of Anthropology, Appa­ lachian State University. 1978 Report of the archeological investigations 14 of the TRW-Watauga County recreation com­ plex. Ms. on file, Department of Anthro­ pology, Appalachian State University. 1979 Addendum to the report of an archeolo­ 15 gical reconnaissance survey of the Hominy Valley interceptor sewer project and the South Buncombe interceptor sewer project, Buncombe and Henderson counties, North Carolina. Ms. on file, Department of Anthropology, Appalachian State University. 1979 Archeological investigation of a proposed 16 barrow site in McDowell County, North Carolina, by Brown Brothers Construction Company. Ms. on file, Department of An­ thropology, Appalachian State University. 1979 Archeological reconnaissance of a small 17 earth fill project in Jackson County, North Carolina. Ms. on file, Depart­ ment of Anthropology, Appalachian State University. 1979 Archeological reconnaissance of a small 18 earth fill project in Polk County, North
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Briefs for the Files
    IES O E IES HARRY E. LeGRAND JR. (All dates 1984) COMMON LOON: At Lake Keowee, S.C., Douglas McNair counted 23 on 10 April, with a late bird there on 26 May. PIED-BILLED GREBE: An excellent inland count was 85, noted by Douglas McNair at Lake Keowee on 13 March. NORTHERN FULMAR: Apparently regular in early spring off the North Carolina coast, single birds (or the same individual) were noted 40 miles SSE of Beaufort Inlet on 7 April by Ricky Davis and party and on 12 April by Lloyd Davidson. BLACK-CAPPED PETREL: Ten were observed by Wayne Irvin, Dave Lee, and others on 3 March in the Gulf Stream off Cape Lookout, N.C. Very rare for South Carolina were four noted by Chris Haney on 11 May approximately 88 miles SE of Charleston. GREATER SHEARWATER: Rather early was one seen by Dennis Forsythe off Charleston on 7 May. MANX SHEARWATER: A good find was one, and possibly a second, off Cape Lookout on 3 March, as seen by Dave Lee, Harry LeGrand, and party. AUDUBON'S SHEARWATER: Chris Haney had an excellent total of 169 on 11 May off Charleston. WILSON'S STORM-PETREL: Dennis Forsythe observed one rather early on 7 May off Charleston. AMERICAN WHITE PELICAN: One was seen in the Morehead City, N.C., area on 15 March and for a week thereafter by Allyn Powell and others. Another was noted by Charlie Walters and Perry Nugent in Charleston harbor on 27 April. DOUBLE-CRESTED CORMORANT: Migrants inland continue to increase, and counts in triple digits are not unusual on some lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station General Technical Report SRS–161 July 2012 Lafayette, Russell; Brooks, Maureen T.; Potyondy, John P.; Audin, Lisa; Krieger, Suzanne L.; Trettin, Carl C. Eds. 2012. Cumulative watershed effects of fuel management in the Eastern United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-161. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station, 327 p. AbstrAct As a result of effective fire suppression activities over the last 75 years and a reduction in timber harvesting on the national forests, biomass has accumulated increasing the susceptibility of large and more severe wildfires. Reducing accumulated fuels is now a major management objective on the national forests. A combination of traditional silvicultural treatments such as prescribed fire and thinning and new innovations are needed to address the myriad of site conditions. Effective fuels management should improve the health of the watershed ensuring the sustainability of the goods and services that are derived from the landscape. However, since fuels management necessarily interacts with other land management considerations and often requires periodic treatments, assessing the cumulative effects can be daunting. This volume and a companion volume focusing on the Western United States (Elliott and others 2010) were designed to provide land managers with a synthesis of the science to support an assessment of the cumulative effects of fuels treatments on forested watersheds in the conterminous United States. This volume is organized to into three sections, an overview of the biophysiography of the Eastern United States, consideration of ecosystem components and how fuel treatments may affect specific processes or properties, and the third section synthesizes fuels management practices and effects in the major ecosystem types of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina State Library Raleigh APPENDICIES to the SURVEY
    North Carolina State Library N.C. Raleigh OOCl. APPENDICIES TO THE SURVEY AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE CATAWBA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, NORTH CAROLINA Darrell E. Louder Fishery Biologist Ao Summary of the Biological, Chemical, and Physical Conditions at Individual Sampling Stations B. Annotated Checklist of Fishes Final Report Federal Aid in Fish Restoration Job I-H, Project F-14-R North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Raleigh, No C. -- 1964 -- A concise summary of biological, chemical, and physical conditions present at each sample station is presented in Appendix A. In addition to the basic findings of the survey, the Sanitation Classifi­ cation for each station is noted. This system is the one used by the North Carolina State Board of Health, Division of Water Pollution Control for assigning minimum standards of water quality based on the best ~~age of~ given stream. A resume of this classification system is as follows:Y A-I - Drinking Water, approved disinfection A-II - Drinking Water, approved complete treatment B Bathing and Recreation C - Fish and Wildlife Propagation D - Agricultural Usage, must sustain fish life E - Navigation and Sewage Disposal Tidal Salt Waters SA - Shellfishing for Market Purposes SB - Bathing and Recreation SC - Fish and Wildlife Propagation SD - Navigation and Sewage Disposal Swp . - Swamp Waters ~aken in part from "Rules and Regulations and Classifications and Water Quality Standards Appliable to Surface Waters of North Carolina," North Carolina State Board of Health (SSSC#2), ✓ A-1 C25-l Anthony Creek, August 1, 1963 Ecol. Class. Rainbow trout Length of sample area 100 ft. Sanitation Class. C 2 miles northwest of Globe Caldwell County Anthony Creek is a designated public mountain trout stream.
    [Show full text]
  • Doc 22 Exhibit 15 Part 1 of 3 Inland Game Fish.Pdf
    8:09-cv-02665-RBH Date Filed 10/14/09 Entry Number 22-34 Page 1 of 21 Colburn 15 8:09-cv-02665-RBH Date Filed 10/14/09 Entry Number 22-34 Page 2 of 21 General Information Inland, Joint and Coastal Fishing How to Measure Inland Game Fish The harvest of Waters. Both the Wildlife Resources Commission and the Div- several game fishes is regulated by length limits. Fish length is ision of Marine Fisheries have licensing, management and determined by measuring along a straight line (in other words, regulatory authority in certain waters along the coast of not along the curvature of the body) the distance from the tip of North Carolina. These waters are designated as inland, joint the closed mouth to the tip of the compressed caudal (tail) fin. and coastal waters. The Wildlife Resources Commission has jurisdiction in inland waters, and the Division of Marine Fisheries has jurisdiction (except that pertaining to inland game fishes) in coastal waters. Both agencies have licensing and regulatory authority in joint waters. The boundaries between inland, joint and coastal fishing waters are prominently marked with metal signs posted adjacent to the affected waters. Lists of these waters, with their boundaries indicated, are available from the Wildlife Resources Commis- sion, 1721 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1721 (www.ncwildlife.org; see Fishing–Publications–Coastal, Joint and Inland Fishing Waters Designations in N.C.), or from the Division of Marine Fisheries, P.O.Box 769, Morehead City, NC 28557 (wwW.ncdmf.net; see Quick Links–Maps to Download).
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2010, Unless Otherwise Noted)
    BRIEFS FOR THE FILES Josh Southern 4100-A Reavis Rd Raleigh, NC 27606 [email protected] (All dates Summer 2010, unless otherwise noted) Briefs for the Files is a seasonal collection of uncommon-to-rare or unusual North and South Carolina bird sightings and events which do not necessarily require a more detailed Field Note or article. Reports of your sightings are due the 20th of the month after the end of the previous season. Winter December 1–February 28 due March 20 Spring March1–May31 dueJune20 Summer June 1–July 31 due August 20 Fall August 1–November 30 due December 20 Reports can be submitted in any format, but I prefer that you type them and list the sightings according to the birds in checklist order (not according to dates or locations). If you submit your report to me through e-mail, please type your report directly into the message or copy it from a word processing program directly into the message. You may also attach your file to the e- mail, but if you do, please let me know the program used and also send a second version saved as a text (.txt) file. Suitable reports for the Briefs include any sightings you feel are unusual, rare, noteworthy, or just plain interesting to you in any way! It is my responsibility to decide which reports merit inclusion in the Briefs. Please be sure to include details of any rare or hard-to-identify birds. I rely in part on sightings reported in Carolinabirds. Please don’t, however, rely on me to pick up your sightings from Carolinabirds.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Inland Fishing, Hunting & Trapping REGULATIONS DIGEST
    North Carolina Inland Fishing, Hunting & Trapping REGULATIONS DIGEST 2021–2022 Effective Aug. 1, 2021 to July 31, 2022 Online at ncwildlife.org Hunt with the Big Dogs On the Currituck Outer Banks, NC The Land of the Wild Goose Currituck is an Algonquin Indian word that means “the land of the wild goose,” and many outdoorsmen have discovered it’s not a fairy tale but rather the stuff of legend. Miles of unspoiled natural habitat, waters, marshes, and woods Corolla • Carova • The Mainland await you where the big dogs hunt, Currituck, NC. Call 877.287.7488 for information or your visitor’s guide Find your guide at VisitCurrituck.com North Carolina Inland Fishing, Hunting & Trapping Contents REGULATIONS DIGEST What’s New This Season �����������������������6 Trapping Regulations and Information ..................................... 52 2021–2022 License Information ................................8 General Information ........................... 8 Hunting Regulations License Requirements and Information .....................................54 State of North Carolina and Exceptions ..................................... 8 Manner of Taking �������������������������������54 Governor Roy Cooper, License Type Descriptions ��������������12 Hunting on Federal Lands ���������������58 Big Game Harvest Reporting ���������59 North Carolina Wildlife License Type Charts ��������������������������20 Bear Seasons and Maps �������������������60 Resources Commission Disabled Sportsman Deer Seasons and Maps ������������������62 Program Information ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of the Empis Subgenus Enoplempis Bigot, East of the Rocky Mountains (Diptera: Empididae)
    Zootaxa 3736 (5): 401–456 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3736.5.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2A05A2A2-CF49-4585-A75D-7086B9DDD7B3 Revision of the Empis subgenus Enoplempis Bigot, east of the Rocky Mountains (Diptera: Empididae) BRADLEY J. SINCLAIR1, SCOTT E. BROOKS2 & JEFFREY M. CUMMING2 1Canadian National Collection of Insects and Ottawa Plant Laboratory - Entomology, CFIA, K.W. Neatby Bldg., C.E.F., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, ON, Canada K1A 0C6. E-mail: [email protected] 2Invertebrate Biodiversity, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, K.W. Neatby Bldg., C.E.F., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, ON, Canada K1A 0C6. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Table of contents Abstract . 401 Introduction . 402 Material and methods . 402 Empis (Enoplempis Bigot) . 403 Taxonomy . 404 Empis (Enoplempis) amytis Walker . 404 Empis (Enoplempis) appalachicola Sinclair sp. nov. 410 Empis (Enoplempis) arthritica Melander . 412 Empis (Enoplempis) ctenocnema Melander . 415 Empis (Enoplempis) enodis Melander . 416 Empis (Enoplempis) gladiator Melander . 418 Empis (Enoplempis) gulosa Coquillett . 421 Empis (Enoplempis) loripedis Coquillett . 424 Empis (Enoplempis) montywoodi Brooks sp. nov. 425 Empis (Enoplempis) nodipoplitea Steykal . 428 Empis (Enoplempis) nuda Loew . 431 Empis (Enoplempis) pectinata Sinclair sp. nov. 433 Empis (Enoplempis) penicillata Brooks sp. nov. 435 Empis (Enoplempis) prodigiosa Cumming sp. nov. 438 Empis (Enoplempis) snoddyi Steyskal . 439 Empis (Enoplempis) stenoptera Loew . 443 Empis (Enoplempis) tridentata Coquillett. 444 Empis (Enoplempis) vockerothi Cumming sp. nov. 448 Empis (Enoplempis) volsella Sinclair sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Carolinas Biodiversity Trail Logo
    DiscoDiscoNatural Treasuresverver of the Charlotte Region About the Trail Welcome to the Central Carolinas – a region with over 106,000 acres of protected lands, rich in natural and cultural history. Throughout this growing metropolis, you will find unique natural treasures, from rare Piedmont Prairies and upland depression swamp forests, to oak-hickory woodlands and bottomland forests. These natural communities, along with the region’s rivers, lakes, streams, and other wetlands, provide food, water and shelter for a variety of wildlife. A careful observer could find some 320 species of birds, 70 species of fish, 40 species of mammals, 80 species of amphibians and reptiles, a wide variety of aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates, and thousands of species of native plants. The Biodiversity Trail celebrates this diversity through a coordinated system of natural areas connected by their unique wildlife and natural communities. The Trail is modeled after watchable wildlife trails, birding trails, and heritage corridors in other states. It is not a physical path, but rather features properties owned by federal, state, local, and non-profit agencies in a 14-county region of the Carolinas. Sites along the trail are open to the public, allowing people to experience and discover these special places. The Biodiversity Trail is an extension of the Strategic Regional Open Space Framework for the Central Carolinas, and was developed to create awareness and support for the region’s existing green assets and natural areas. Initiated by the Stewardship Advisory Council, a citizen’s advisory group for Mecklenburg County Park and Recreation Department, the Biodiversity Trail is a dynamic project that will grow through time and involve partners from throughout the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Scenic Byways
    n c s c e n i c b y w a y s a h c rol rt in o a n fourth edition s c s en ay ic byw North Carolina Department of Transportation Table of ConTenTs Click on Byway. Introduction Legend NCDOT Programs Rules of the Road Cultural Resources Blue Ridge Parkway Scenic Byways State Map MOuntains Waterfall Byway Nantahala Byway Cherohala Skyway Indian Lakes Scenic Byway Whitewater Way Forest Heritage Scenic Byway appalachian Medley French Broad Overview Historic Flat Rock Scenic Byway Drovers Road Black Mountain Rag Pacolet River Byway South Mountain Scenery Mission Crossing Little Parkway New River Valley Byway I-26 Scenic Highway u.S. 421 Scenic Byway Pisgah Loop Scenic Byway upper Yadkin Way Yadkin Valley Scenic Byway Smoky Mountain Scenic Byway Mt. Mitchell Scenic Drive PIedmont Hanging Rock Scenic Byway Colonial Heritage Byway Football Road Crowders Mountain Drive Mill Bridge Scenic Byway 2 BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS BACK TO BYWAYS MAP Table of ConTenTs uwharrie Scenic Road Rolling Kansas Byway Pee Dee Valley Drive Grassy Island Crossing Sandhills Scenic Drive Birkhead Wilderness Route Flint Hill Ramble Indian Heritage Trail Pottery Road Devil’s Stompin’ Ground Road North Durham Country Byway averasboro Battlefield Scenic Byway Clayton Bypass Scenic Byway Scots-Welsh Heritage Byway COastaL PLain Blue-Gray Scenic Byway Meteor Lakes Byway Green Swamp Byway Brunswick Town Road Cape Fear Historic Byway Lafayette’s Tour Tar Heel Trace edenton-Windsor Loop Perquimans Crossing Pamlico Scenic Byway alligator River Route Roanoke Voyages Corridor Outer Banks Scenic Byway State Parks & Recreation areas Historic Sites For More Information Bibliography 3 BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS BACK TO BYWAYS MAP inTroduction The N.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Coordinating Committee Cisco Webex Virtual Meeting Instructions Tuesday, May 11, 2:00 PM
    Technical Coordinating Committee Cisco WebEx Virtual Meeting Instructions Tuesday, May 11, 2:00 PM 1. Download the Cisco WebEx Meetings software here. 2. To ensure continuity in meeting streaming it is recommended you close any programs or applications running in the background. You may also need to ask others in the home to suspend their applications if you are having trouble viewing the meeting. 3. On the day of the meeting, open the calendar meeting invitation or email with the meeting link. By Computer or Smart Phone: By Phone: Join Meeting, +1-408-418-9388 United States Toll Meeting Number: 132 523 4136 Access Code: 132 523 4136 Password: Q68PipWUf3p Attendee ID: 76874798 4. Recommend joining by computer. a. A preview video window will open before joining the meeting. Once ready, click. b. You will be prompted to join by computer audio or by calling in. c. Note: You can login via your computer and call in so you are able to see the slides. 5. The first time joining the meeting you will be asked to provide basic information (name, department, etc.). Please include responses so we can identify members easily. 6. Additional recommendations: a. Join from a quiet place. b. Please mute yourself during the meeting unless speaking. If you are having trouble during the meeting you may email Lydia McIntyre. Technical Coordinating Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, May 11, 2:00 PM WebEx Online Virtual Meeting Action Items: 1. March 10, 2021 Meeting Minutes 2. MTIP Amendment: Statewide Transit Projects 3. MTIP Amendment & Modification: MPO Area Roadway Projects 4.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina SCORP
    NORTH CAROLINA OUTDOOR RECREATION PLAN 2015 - 2020 May 2015 Division of Parks and Recreation N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources INTRODUCTION North Carolina has been blessed with a rich and varied tapestry of lands and waters. The landscape stretches from the Tidewater’s ocean beaches, sounds and marshes westward through flat Coastal Plain swamp forests to the rolling Piedmont and on to ancient and hauntingly beautiful mountains, well- known and loved not just by North Carolinians, but by millions of Americans nationwide. Traversing and connecting this landscape are beautiful rivers and streams. These lands and waters provide not only breathtaking scenery and magnificent settings for outdoor recreation, but also serve to support a rich diversity of plant and animal life. North Carolina is indeed “Naturally Wonderful”. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Since passage of the federal Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) Act of 1965, preparation of a Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) has been required in order for states to be eligible for LWCF acquisition and development assistance. Past SCORPs and this edition have provided a coordinated framework addressing the problems, needs, and opportunities related to the need for improved public outdoor recreation. The N.C. Division of Parks and Recreation, the state agency with authority to represent and act for the state for purposes of the LWCF Act, prepared this plan. LWCF funds have provided $4.2 million for projects in North Carolina during the past five years, an average of $850,000 annually. Since 1965, more than $80 million of LWCF assistance has been provided for more than 900 projects.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Green Book
    2011 grEEn book LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION An Excellent Investment AbouT LAnD for ToMorroW Land for Tomorrow is a statewide coalition of community leaders, organizations and local governments with a common goal: increasing land and water conservation. The coalition works to ensure that the state’s four conservation trust funds – Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF), natural Heritage Trust Fund (nHTF), Parks and recreation Trust Fund (PArTF) and the Agricultural Development and Farmland Preservation Trust Fund (ADFPTF) – are well funded. north Carolina leaders have been forward-thinking, creating the trust funds and continuing to fund them over the years. This smart leadership has resulted in the preservation of hundreds of thousands of acres of family farms, forests, stream banks, game lands, parks, greenways and trails. While conservation has kept many areas natural, Photo © Debbie Crane it has also played a major role in the state’s economy, report participated in the summit. boosting agriculture, tourism, forestry, hunting, fishing great trust funds need both the flexibility and and wildlife-watching. The participants – who included former gov. Jim capacity to take advantage of what is an Martin, a republican, and Lt. gov. Walter Dalton, a unprecedented buyer’s market,” he said. Land for Tomorrow publishes this annual green book Democrat – agreed that conservation funding is vital to to provide an update on the current state of public This report gives you an idea of what conservation north Carolina’s economy. In the past couple of state conservation funding in north Carolina. This year’s funding has already done for north Carolina. It includes budget years, public conservation funding has been green book recaps the organization’s recent seminar a county-by-county list so you can see what has happened reduced by more than 50 percent.
    [Show full text]