DOCSLIB.ORG

Math 111 Calculus II

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Math 111 Calculus II LUTHER COLLEGE UNIVERSITY OF REGINA Math 111 Calculus II by Robert G. Petry and Fotini Labropulu published by Campion College and Luther College 2.5.2 Inverse Cosine . 31 2.5.3 Inverse Tangent . 32 2.5.4 Other Trigonometric Inverses . 33 2.6 L'H^opital'sRule . 35 2.6.1 Indeterminate Forms of Contents type 0 · 1 and 1 − 1 .. 36 2.6.2 Exponential Indeterminate Forms . 37 3 Integration Methods 39 1 Integration Review1 3.1 Integration by Parts . 40 1.1 The Meaning of the Definite 3.2 Trigonometric Integrals . 42 Integral . .2 3.3 Trigonometric Substitution . 45 1.2 The Fundamental Theorem of 3.4 Partial Fraction Decomposition . 47 Calculus . .3 3.5 General Strategies for Integration 51 1.3 Indefinite Integrals . .4 3.6 Improper Integrals . 52 1.4 Integration by Substitution . .5 3.6.1 Improper Integrals of the 1.5 Integration Examples . .6 First Kind . 52 3.6.2 Improper Integrals of the 2 Inverses and Other Functions7 Second Kind . 53 2.1 Inverse Functions . .8 2.1.1 Horizontal Line Test . .8 4 Sequences and Series 57 2.1.2 Finding Inverse Functions 10 4.1 Sequences . 58 2.1.3 Graphs of Inverse Functions 11 4.2 Series . 63 2.1.4 Derivative of an Inverse 4.3 Testing Series with Positive Terms 67 Function . 12 4.3.1 The Integral Test . 67 2.1.5 Creating Invertible 4.3.2 The Basic Comparison Test 70 Functions . 12 4.3.3 The Limit Comparison Test 71 2.2 Exponential Functions . 13 4.4 The Alternating Series Test . 73 2.2.1 The Natural Exponential 4.5 Tests of Absolute Convergence . 75 Function . 14 4.5.1 Absolute Convergence . 75 2.2.2 Derivative of ex ...... 16 4.5.2 The Ratio Test . 75 2.2.3 Integral of ex ....... 16 4.5.3 The Root Test . 76 2.2.4 Simplifying Exponential 4.5.4 Rearrangement of Series . 77 Expressions . 17 4.6 Procedure for Testing Series . 78 2.3 Logarithmic Functions . 18 4.7 Power Series . 80 2.3.1 Logarithmic Function 4.8 Representing Functions with Properties . 19 Power Series . 83 2.3.2 The Natural Logarithmic 4.9 Maclaurin Series . 85 Function . 20 4.10 Taylor Series . 87 2.3.3 Solving Exponential and Logarithmic Equations . 21 5 Integration Applications 91 2.3.4 Derivative of the Natural 5.1 Areas Between Curves . 92 Logarithmic Function . 22 5.2 Calculation of Volume . 94 2.3.5 Derivatives Using 5.2.1 Volume as a Calculus Arbitrary Bases . 23 Problem . 94 2.3.6 Logarithmic Differentiation 23 5.2.2 Solids of Revolution . 95 1 x 2.3.7 Integral of x and a ... 25 5.2.3 The Disk Method . 96 2.4 Exponential Growth and Decay . 26 5.2.4 The Washer Method . 98 2.5 Inverse Trigonometric Functions . 29 5.3 The Shell Method . 101 2.5.1 Inverse Sine . 29 5.4 Determining the Volume Method 105 * Sections denoted with an asterisk are optional and may be omitted in the course. 2 CONTENTS 3 5.5 Arc Length . 107 6.2.3 Arc Length . 118 5.6 Areas of Surfaces of Revolution . 110 7 Polar Coordinates 119 6 Parametric Equations 113 7.1 Polar Coordinates . 120 6.1 Parametric Equations . 114 7.1.1 Converting Between Polar 6.2 Calculus of Parametric Curves . 116 and Cartesian Coordinates 121 6.2.1 Tangent Slope and 7.1.2 Curves in Polar Coordinates 121 Concavity . 116 7.1.3 Symmetry in Polar Curves 122 6.2.2 Area Under the Curve . 117 7.1.4 Tangents . 122 4 Unit 1: Integration Review 1 2 1.1 The Meaning of the Definite Integral 1.1 The Meaning of the Definite Integral The definite integral of the function f(x) between x = a and x = b is written: Z b f(x) dx a Geometrically it equals the area A between the curve y = f(x) and the x-axis between the vertical lines x = a and x = b: y y = f(x) A x a b More precisely, assuming a < b, the definite integral is the net sum of the signed areas between the curve y = f(x) and the x-axis where areas below the x-axis (i.e. where f(x) dips below the x-axis) are counted negatively. R b R The notation used for the definite integral, a f(x) dx, is elegant and intuitive. We are umming (R dA) the (infinitesimally) small differential rectangular areas dA = f(x)·dx of height f(x) and width dx at each value x between x = a and x = b: y y = f(x) dx dA A f(x) x a x b We will see soon how viewing integrals as sums of differentials can be used to come up with formulas for calculations aside from just area. Integration Review 3 1.2 The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus As seen in a previous calculus course, the definite integral can be written as a limiting sum (Riemann Sum) of N rectangles of finite width ∆x = (b − a)=N where we let the number of rectangles (N) go to infinity (and consequently the width ∆x ! 0). This method of evaluating a definite integral is hard or impossible to compute exactly yfor most functions. An easy way to evaluate definite integrals is due to the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus which relates the calculation of a definite integral with the evaluation of the antiderivative F (x) of f(x): Theorem: 1.1. The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus: If f is continuous on [a; b] then Z b f(x) dx = F (b) − F (a) a for any F an antiderivative of f, i.e. F 0(x) = f(x). b Notationally we write F (b) − F (a) with the shorthand F (x)ja, i.e. b F (x)ja = F (b) − F (a) ; where, unlike the integral sign, the bar is placed on the right. 4 1.3 Indefinite Integrals 1.3 Indefinite Integrals Because of the intimate relationship between the antiderivative and the definite integral, we define the indefinite integral of f(x) (with no limits a or b) to just be the antiderivative, i.e. Z f(x) dx = F (x) + C where F (x) is an antiderivate of f(x) (so F 0(x) = f(x)) and C is an arbitrary constant. The latter is d required since the antiderivative of a function is not unique as dx C = 0 implies we can always add a constant to an antiderivative to get another antiderivative of the same function. Using our notation for indefinite integrals and our knowledge of derivatives gives the following. Table of Indefinite Integrals Z 1 1. xn dx = xn+1 + C (n 6= −1) n + 1 Z 2. cos x dx = sin x + C Z 3. sin x dx = − cos x + C Z 4. sec2 x dx = tan x + C Z 5. sec x tan x dx = sec x + C Z 6. csc2 x dx = − cot x + C Z 7. csc x cot x dx = − csc x + C Z Z 8. cf(x) dx = c f(x) dx Z Z Z 9. [f(x) ± g(x)] dx = f(x) dx ± g(x) dx In the last two integration formulae f(x) and g(x) are functions while c is a constant. For indefinite 1 n+1 n n integrals we say, for example, that n+1 x + C is the (indefinite) integral of x where x is the integrand. The process of finding the integral is called integration. Each of these indefinite integrals may be verified by differentiating the right hand side and verifying that the integrand is the result. Integration Review 5 1.4 Integration by Substitution The last two general integral results allow us to break up an integral of sums or differences into integrals of the individual pieces and to pull out any constant multipliers. Another useful way of solving an integral is to use the Substitution Rule which arises by working the differentiation Chain Rule in reverse. Theorem: 1.2. Substitution Rule (Indefinite Integrals): Suppose u = g(x) is a differentiable function whose range of values is an interval I upon which a further function f is continuous, then Z Z f(g(x))g0(x) dx = f(u) du : where the right hand integral is to be evaluated at u = g(x) after integration. Here the du appearing on the right side is the differential: du = g0(x)dx du 0 which, recall, can be remembered by thinking dx = g (x) and multiplying both sides by dx. When using the Substitution Rule with definite integrals we can avoid the final back-substitution of u = g(x) of the indefinite case by instead just changing the limits of the integral appropriately to the u-values corresponding to the x-limits: Theorem: 1.3. Substitution Rule (Definite Integrals): Suppose u = g(x) is a differentiable function whose derivative g0 is continuous on [a; b] and a further function f is continuous on the range of u = g(x) (evaluated on [a; b]), then Z b Z g(b) f(g(x))g0(x) dx = f(u) du : a g(a) 6 1.5 Integration Examples 1.5 Integration Examples Examples: Evaluate the following integrals: Z p 2 1. t2 + t − dt t2 1 Z 2 2. t2 + 1 dt 0 Z 1 3. x2 x3 + 2 3 dx π Z 4 4. (sec x − tan x) sec x dx 0 p Z cos x 5.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3.3 Convergence Tests for Infinite Series
    3.3 Convergence Tests for Infinite Series 3.3.1 The integral test We may plot the sequence an in the Cartesian plane, with independent variable n and dependent variable a: n X The sum an can then be represented geometrically as the area of a collection of rectangles with n=1 height an and width 1. This geometric viewpoint suggests that we compare this sum to an integral. If an can be represented as a continuous function of n, for real numbers n, not just integers, and if the m X sequence an is decreasing, then an looks a bit like area under the curve a = a(n). n=1 In particular, m m+2 X Z m+1 X an > an dn > an n=1 n=1 n=2 For example, let us examine the first 10 terms of the harmonic series 10 X 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 = 1 + + + + + + + + + : n 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 1 1 If we draw the curve y = x (or a = n ) we see that 10 11 10 X 1 Z 11 dx X 1 X 1 1 > > = − 1 + : n x n n 11 1 1 2 1 (See Figure 1, copied from Wikipedia) Z 11 dx Now = ln(11) − ln(1) = ln(11) so 1 x 10 X 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 = 1 + + + + + + + + + > ln(11) n 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 and 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 + + + + + + + + + < ln(11) + (1 − ): 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Z dx So we may bound our series, above and below, with some version of the integral : x If we allow the sum to turn into an infinite series, we turn the integral into an improper integral.
    [Show full text]
  • On a Series of Goldbach and Euler Llu´Is Bibiloni, Pelegr´I Viader, and Jaume Parad´Is
    On a Series of Goldbach and Euler Llu´ıs Bibiloni, Pelegr´ı Viader, and Jaume Parad´ıs 1. INTRODUCTION. Euler’s paper Variae observationes circa series infinitas [6] ought to be considered important for several reasons. It contains the first printed ver- sion of Euler’s product for the Riemann zeta-function; it definitely establishes the use of the symbol π to denote the perimeter of the circle of diameter one; and it introduces a legion of interesting infinite products and series. The first of these is Theorem 1, which Euler says was communicated to him and proved by Goldbach in a letter (now lost): 1 = 1. n − m,n≥2 m 1 (One must avoid repetitions in this sum.) We refer to this result as the “Goldbach-Euler Theorem.” Goldbach and Euler’s proof is a typical example of what some historians consider a misuse of divergent series, for it starts by assigning a “value” to the harmonic series 1/n and proceeds by manipulating it by substraction and replacement of other series until the desired result is reached. This unchecked use of divergent series to obtain valid results was a standard procedure in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. It has provoked quite a lot of criticism, correction, and, why not, praise of the audacity of the mathematicians of the time. They were led by Euler, the “Master of Us All,” as Laplace christened him. We present the original proof of the Goldbach- Euler theorem in section 2. Euler was obviously familiar with other instances of proofs that used divergent se- ries.
    [Show full text]
  • Series, Cont'd
    Jim Lambers MAT 169 Fall Semester 2009-10 Lecture 5 Notes These notes correspond to Section 8.2 in the text. Series, cont'd In the previous lecture, we defined the concept of an infinite series, and what it means for a series to converge to a finite sum, or to diverge. We also worked with one particular type of series, a geometric series, for which it is particularly easy to determine whether it converges, and to compute its limit when it does exist. Now, we consider other types of series and investigate their behavior. Telescoping Series Consider the series 1 X 1 1 − : n n + 1 n=1 If we write out the first few terms, we obtain 1 X 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 − = 1 − + − + − + − + ··· n n + 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 n=1 1 1 1 1 1 1 = 1 + − + − + − + ··· 2 2 3 3 4 4 = 1: We see that nearly all of the fractions cancel one another, revealing the limit. This is an example of a telescoping series. It turns out that many series have this property, even though it is not immediately obvious. Example The series 1 X 1 n(n + 2) n=1 is also a telescoping series. To see this, we compute the partial fraction decomposition of each term. This decomposition has the form 1 A B = + : n(n + 2) n n + 2 1 To compute A and B, we multipy both sides by the common denominator n(n + 2) and obtain 1 = A(n + 2) + Bn: Substituting n = 0 yields A = 1=2, and substituting n = −2 yields B = −1=2.
    [Show full text]
  • Series: Convergence and Divergence Comparison Tests
    Series: Convergence and Divergence Here is a compilation of what we have done so far (up to the end of October) in terms of convergence and divergence. • Series that we know about: P∞ n Geometric Series: A geometric series is a series of the form n=0 ar . The series converges if |r| < 1 and 1 a1 diverges otherwise . If |r| < 1, the sum of the entire series is 1−r where a is the first term of the series and r is the common ratio. P∞ 1 2 p-Series Test: The series n=1 np converges if p1 and diverges otherwise . P∞ • Nth Term Test for Divergence: If limn→∞ an 6= 0, then the series n=1 an diverges. Note: If limn→∞ an = 0 we know nothing. It is possible that the series converges but it is possible that the series diverges. Comparison Tests: P∞ • Direct Comparison Test: If a series n=1 an has all positive terms, and all of its terms are eventually bigger than those in a series that is known to be divergent, then it is also divergent. The reverse is also true–if all the terms are eventually smaller than those of some convergent series, then the series is convergent. P P P That is, if an, bn and cn are all series with positive terms and an ≤ bn ≤ cn for all n sufficiently large, then P P if cn converges, then bn does as well P P if an diverges, then bn does as well. (This is a good test to use with rational functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Mere Convergence
    Beyond Mere Convergence James A. Sellers Department of Mathematics The Pennsylvania State University 107 Whitmore Laboratory University Park, PA 16802 [email protected] February 5, 2002 – REVISED Abstract In this article, I suggest that calculus instruction should include a wider variety of examples of convergent and divergent series than is usually demonstrated. In particular, a number of convergent series, P k3 such as 2k , are considered, and their exact values are found in a k≥1 straightforward manner. We explore and utilize a number of math- ematical topics, including manipulation of certain power series and recurrences. During my most recent spring break, I read William Dunham’s book Euler: The Master of Us All [3]. I was thoroughly intrigued by the material presented and am certainly glad I selected it as part of the week’s reading. Of special interest were Dunham’s comments on series manipulations and the power series identities developed by Euler and his contemporaries, for I had just completed teaching convergence and divergence of infinite series in my calculus class. In particular, Dunham [3, p. 47-48] presents Euler’s proof of the Basel Problem, a challenge from Jakob Bernoulli to determine the 1 P 1 exact value of the sum k2 . Euler was the first to solve this problem by k≥1 π2 proving that the sum equals 6 . I was reminded of my students’ interest in this result when I shared it with them just weeks before. I had already mentioned to them that exact values for relatively few families of convergent series could be determined.
    [Show full text]
  • Series Convergence Tests Math 121 Calculus II Spring 2015
    Series Convergence Tests Math 121 Calculus II Spring 2015 Some series converge, some diverge. Geometric series. We've already looked at these. We know when a geometric series 1 X converges and what it converges to. A geometric series arn converges when its ratio r lies n=0 a in the interval (−1; 1), and, when it does, it converges to the sum . 1 − r 1 X 1 The harmonic series. The standard harmonic series diverges to 1. Even though n n=1 1 1 its terms 1, 2 , 3 , . approach 0, the partial sums Sn approach infinity, so the series diverges. The main questions for a series. Question 1: given a series does it converge or diverge? Question 2: if it converges, what does it converge to? There are several tests that help with the first question and we'll look at those now. The term test. The only series that can converge are those whose terms approach 0. That 1 X is, if ak converges, then ak ! 0. k=1 Here's why. If the series converges, then the limit of the sequence of its partial sums n th X approaches the sum S, that is, Sn ! S where Sn is the n partial sum Sn = ak. Then k=1 lim an = lim (Sn − Sn−1) = lim Sn − lim Sn−1 = S − S = 0: n!1 n!1 n!1 n!1 The contrapositive of that statement gives a test which can tell us that some series diverge. Theorem 1 (The term test). If the terms of the series don't converge to 0, then the series diverges.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculus Terminology
    AP Calculus BC Calculus Terminology Absolute Convergence Asymptote Continued Sum Absolute Maximum Average Rate of Change Continuous Function Absolute Minimum Average Value of a Function Continuously Differentiable Function Absolutely Convergent Axis of Rotation Converge Acceleration Boundary Value Problem Converge Absolutely Alternating Series Bounded Function Converge Conditionally Alternating Series Remainder Bounded Sequence Convergence Tests Alternating Series Test Bounds of Integration Convergent Sequence Analytic Methods Calculus Convergent Series Annulus Cartesian Form Critical Number Antiderivative of a Function Cavalieri’s Principle Critical Point Approximation by Differentials Center of Mass Formula Critical Value Arc Length of a Curve Centroid Curly d Area below a Curve Chain Rule Curve Area between Curves Comparison Test Curve Sketching Area of an Ellipse Concave Cusp Area of a Parabolic Segment Concave Down Cylindrical Shell Method Area under a Curve Concave Up Decreasing Function Area Using Parametric Equations Conditional Convergence Definite Integral Area Using Polar Coordinates Constant Term Definite Integral Rules Degenerate Divergent Series Function Operations Del Operator e Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Deleted Neighborhood Ellipsoid GLB Derivative End Behavior Global Maximum Derivative of a Power Series Essential Discontinuity Global Minimum Derivative Rules Explicit Differentiation Golden Spiral Difference Quotient Explicit Function Graphic Methods Differentiable Exponential Decay Greatest Lower Bound Differential
    [Show full text]
  • 3.2 Introduction to Infinite Series
    3.2 Introduction to Infinite Series Many of our infinite sequences, for the remainder of the course, will be defined by sums. For example, the sequence m X 1 S := : (1) m 2n n=1 is defined by a sum. Its terms (partial sums) are 1 ; 2 1 1 3 + = ; 2 4 4 1 1 1 7 + + = ; 2 4 8 8 1 1 1 1 15 + + + = ; 2 4 8 16 16 ::: These infinite sequences defined by sums are called infinite series. Review of sigma notation The Greek letter Σ used in this notation indicates that we are adding (\summing") elements of a certain pattern. (We used this notation back in Calculus 1, when we first looked at integrals.) Here our sums may be “infinite”; when this occurs, we are really looking at a limit. Resources An introduction to sequences a standard part of single variable calculus. It is covered in every calculus textbook. For example, one might look at * section 11.3 (Integral test), 11.4, (Comparison tests) , 11.5 (Ratio & Root tests), 11.6 (Alternating, abs. conv & cond. conv) in Calculus, Early Transcendentals (11th ed., 2006) by Thomas, Weir, Hass, Giordano (Pearson) * section 11.3 (Integral test), 11.4, (comparison tests), 11.5 (alternating series), 11.6, (Absolute conv, ratio and root), 11.7 (summary) in Calculus, Early Transcendentals (6th ed., 2008) by Stewart (Cengage) * sections 8.3 (Integral), 8.4 (Comparison), 8.5 (alternating), 8.6, Absolute conv, ratio and root, in Calculus, Early Transcendentals (1st ed., 2011) by Tan (Cengage) Integral tests, comparison tests, ratio & root tests.
    [Show full text]
  • Sequences, Series and Taylor Approximation (Ma2712b, MA2730)
    Sequences, Series and Taylor Approximation (MA2712b, MA2730) Level 2 Teaching Team Current curator: Simon Shaw November 20, 2015 Contents 0 Introduction, Overview 6 1 Taylor Polynomials 10 1.1 Lecture 1: Taylor Polynomials, Definition . .. 10 1.1.1 Reminder from Level 1 about Differentiable Functions . .. 11 1.1.2 Definition of Taylor Polynomials . 11 1.2 Lectures 2 and 3: Taylor Polynomials, Examples . ... 13 x 1.2.1 Example: Compute and plot Tnf for f(x) = e ............ 13 1.2.2 Example: Find the Maclaurin polynomials of f(x) = sin x ...... 14 2 1.2.3 Find the Maclaurin polynomial T11f for f(x) = sin(x ) ....... 15 1.2.4 QuestionsforChapter6: ErrorEstimates . 15 1.3 Lecture 4 and 5: Calculus of Taylor Polynomials . .. 17 1.3.1 GeneralResults............................... 17 1.4 Lecture 6: Various Applications of Taylor Polynomials . ... 22 1.4.1 RelativeExtrema .............................. 22 1.4.2 Limits .................................... 24 1.4.3 How to Calculate Complicated Taylor Polynomials? . 26 1.5 ExerciseSheet1................................... 29 1.5.1 ExerciseSheet1a .............................. 29 1.5.2 FeedbackforSheet1a ........................... 33 2 Real Sequences 40 2.1 Lecture 7: Definitions, Limit of a Sequence . ... 40 2.1.1 DefinitionofaSequence .......................... 40 2.1.2 LimitofaSequence............................. 41 2.1.3 Graphic Representations of Sequences . .. 43 2.2 Lecture 8: Algebra of Limits, Special Sequences . ..... 44 2.2.1 InfiniteLimits................................ 44 1 2.2.2 AlgebraofLimits.............................. 44 2.2.3 Some Standard Convergent Sequences . .. 46 2.3 Lecture 9: Bounded and Monotone Sequences . ..... 48 2.3.1 BoundedSequences............................. 48 2.3.2 Convergent Sequences and Closed Bounded Intervals . .... 48 2.4 Lecture10:MonotoneSequences .
    [Show full text]
  • Calculus Online Textbook Chapter 10
    Contents CHAPTER 9 Polar Coordinates and Complex Numbers 9.1 Polar Coordinates 348 9.2 Polar Equations and Graphs 351 9.3 Slope, Length, and Area for Polar Curves 356 9.4 Complex Numbers 360 CHAPTER 10 Infinite Series 10.1 The Geometric Series 10.2 Convergence Tests: Positive Series 10.3 Convergence Tests: All Series 10.4 The Taylor Series for ex, sin x, and cos x 10.5 Power Series CHAPTER 11 Vectors and Matrices 11.1 Vectors and Dot Products 11.2 Planes and Projections 11.3 Cross Products and Determinants 11.4 Matrices and Linear Equations 11.5 Linear Algebra in Three Dimensions CHAPTER 12 Motion along a Curve 12.1 The Position Vector 446 12.2 Plane Motion: Projectiles and Cycloids 453 12.3 Tangent Vector and Normal Vector 459 12.4 Polar Coordinates and Planetary Motion 464 CHAPTER 13 Partial Derivatives 13.1 Surfaces and Level Curves 472 13.2 Partial Derivatives 475 13.3 Tangent Planes and Linear Approximations 480 13.4 Directional Derivatives and Gradients 490 13.5 The Chain Rule 497 13.6 Maxima, Minima, and Saddle Points 504 13.7 Constraints and Lagrange Multipliers 514 CHAPTER Infinite Series Infinite series can be a pleasure (sometimes). They throw a beautiful light on sin x and cos x. They give famous numbers like n and e. Usually they produce totally unknown functions-which might be good. But on the painful side is the fact that an infinite series has infinitely many terms. It is not easy to know the sum of those terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Drainage Geocomposite Workshop
    January/February 2000 Volume 18, Number 1 Drainage geocomposite workshop By Gregory N. Richardson, Sam R. Allen, C. Joel Sprague A number of recent designer’s columns have focused on the design of drainage geocomposites (Richard- son and Zhao, 1998), so only areas of concern are discussed here. Two design considerations requiring the most consideration by a designer are: 1) assumed rate of fluid inflow draining into the geocomposite, and 2) long-term reduction and safety factors required to assure adequate performance over the service life of the drainage system. In regions of the United States that are not arid or semi-arid, a reasonable upper limit for inflow into a drainage layer can be estimated by assuming that the soil immediately above the drain layer is saturated. This saturation produces a unit gradient flow in the overlying soil such that the inflow rate, r, is approximately θ equal to the permeability of the soil, ksoil. The required transmissivity, , of the drainage layer is then equal to: θ = r*L/i = ksoil*L/i where L is the effective drainage length of the geocomposite and i is the flow gradient (head change/flow length). This represents an upper limit for flow into the geocomposite. In arid and semi-arid regions of the USA saturation of the soil layers may be an overly conservative assumption, however, no alternative rec- ommendations can currently be given. Regardless of the assumed r value, a geocomposite drainage layer must be designed such that flow is not in- advertently restricted prior to removal from the drain.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10 Infinite Series
    10.1 The Geometric Series (page 373) CHAPTER 10 INFINITE SERIES 10.1 The Geometric Series The advice in the text is: Learn the geometric series. This is the most important series and also the simplest. The pure geometric series starts with the constant term 1: 1+x +x2 +... = A.With other symbols CzoP = &.The ratio between terms is x (or r). Convergence requires 1x1 < 1(or Irl < 1). A closely related geometric series starts with any number a, instead of 1. Just multiply everything by a : a + ox + ax2 + - .= &. With other symbols x:=oern = &. As a particular case, choose a = xN+l. The geometric series has its first terms chopped off: Now do the opposite. Keep the first terms and chop of the last terms. Instead of an infinite series you have a finite series. The sum looks harder at first, but not after you see where it comes from: 1- xN+l N 1- rN+l Front end : 1+ x + - -.+ xN = or Ern= 1-2 - ' n=O 1-r The proof is in one line. Start with the whole series and subtract the tail end. That leaves the front end. It is =N+1 the difference between and TT; - complete sum minus tail end. Again you can multiply everything by a. The front end is a finite sum, and the restriction 1x1 < 1or Irl < 1 is now omitted. We only avoid x = 1or r = 1, because the formula gives g. (But with x = 1the front end is 1+ 1+ . + 1. We don't need a formula to add up 1's.) Personal note: I just heard a lecture on the mathematics of finance.
    [Show full text]