DOCSLIB.ORG

Edcd\Vbn Vcy I]Z Hgv^G^Z Ndaz

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Edcd\Vbn Vcy I]Z Hgv^G^Z Ndaz Monogamy and the Prairie Vole Studies of the prairie vole—a secretive, mouselike animal—have revealed hormones that may be responsible for monogamous behavior by C. Sue Carter and Lowell L. Getz bservation of the mating and females of monogamous species tend from studies of prairie voles was the pup-rearing habits of nonde- to be about the same in size and ap- observation that social cues regulate Oscript, brown rodents that live pearance. Mated pairs will defend the the reproductive physiology of this spe- under weeds and grasses might not nest and territory from intruders, and cies. Even to enter estrus (sexual heat), seem an obvious way to improve knowl- both parents care for the young. Monog- a female prairie vole must sniÝ a male. edge of monogamy. After all, most hu- amous mammals may form complex Indeed, Milo E. Richmond, now at Cor- mans can attest to the complexity of social groups that include an extended nell University, found that female prai- male-female relationships. Yet studies family and oÝspring of various ages. rie voles do not have the ovarian cycles of the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogas- Incest is avoided within these families; that are typical of nonmonogamous ter), a common pest throughout the adult young usually do not reproduce mammals. In monogamous voles, a fe- midwestern U.S., have led us on a fasci- as long as they live with related family male must have a male partner to in- nating scientiÞc journey from our start- members. Finally, we should point out duce estrus. ing point in ecology to the exploration that although common in birds, monog- Furthermore, not just any male can of the neuroendocrinology of social amy is rare in mammals. In an exhaus- bring a female into heat. Fathers and bonds. Unlike most rodents, prairie tive survey, Devra G. Kleiman of the Na- brothers do not seem capable of elicit- voles form long-lasting pair bonds, and tional Zoological Park in Washington, ing sniÛng. This may be an adaptive both parents share in raising their D.C., found that only about 3 percent mechanism designed to prevent incest. young. Our studies have provided a new of mammals are monogamous. In fact, both males and females will es- understanding of the importance of two Sexual exclusivity, however, is not a sentially remain prepubescent as long hormones, oxytocin and vasopressin, feature of monogamy. Studies of the as they stay with their families. which are well known for their respec- prairie vole as well as those of other tive roles in reproduction and body wa- mammals and birds have indicated that y sniÛng an appropriate male, ter regulation. Work with voles now sug- absolute sexual monogamy is not nec- the female picks up a chemical gests that these hormones are involved essarily associated with social monog- B signal called a pheromone. Phero- in the development of monogamy. amy. In fact, DNA Þngerprinting tests mones in turn trigger the hormonal The chief criterion that deÞnes mo- have shown that oÝspring of female events needed to activate the ovaries nogamy is a lifelong association be- prairie voles are not always fathered by and to induce heat. A small chemical tween a male and a female. Within this the cohabiting males. In some cases, a sense organ, known as the vomerona- broad deÞnition lie several characteris- litter may have mixed paternity. sal organ, helps to mediate the eÝects tics that are easily observed. Males and Because prairie voles incorporate the of pheromones. John J. Lepri, now at the deÞning features of monogamy, they University of North Carolina at Greens- make excellent subjects for the explo- boro, and Charles J. Wysocki of the Mo- ration of the biological foundations of nell Chemical Senses Center in Philadel- C. SUE CARTER and LOWELL L. GETZ monogamy, at least as it exists among phia found that removal of the vomero- have collaborated on their respective studies of behavioral endocrinology and nonhumans. Prairie voles are also small, nasal organ in the female prevented the Þeldwork to investigate the biology of weighing only a few ounces, and are eas- start of heat. A similar eÝect occurs monogamy. Both are fellows of the Amer- ily reared in the laboratory. But of par- when the olfactory bulb is detached. By ican Association for the Advancement of ticular importance for understanding removing the bulb, Jessie R. Williams, Science. Carter received her Ph.D. from the biology of monogamy is the fact Brian Kirkpatrick and Burton Slotnick, the University of Arkansas at Fayette- that not all voles are monogamous. The working in our University of Maryland ville. Before taking on her current posi- meadow vole (M. pennsylvanicus) and laboratory, disrupted the sexual and tion as professor of zoology at the Uni- the montane vole (M. montanus) show social behaviors of the prairie voles. versity of Maryland, she was professor of psychology and ecology, ethology and no indications of monogamy. Voles of In our laboratory, Dean E. Dluzen evolution at the University of Illinois. these species are rarely retrapped with found that once a female is exposed Getz heads the department of ecology, the same partner and do not establish ethology and evolution at the University stable families, and males of these spe- of Illinois. He received his Ph.D. from cies do not usually care for their young. the University of Michigan. The work de- PRAIRIE VOLES (Microtus ochrogaster) Therefore, comparisons of prairie voles engage in prolonged periods of mating, scribed here reßects a 15-year collabora- with their nonmonogamous relatives tion and arose from observations made often past the time that is needed to en- during approximately 35 years of Þeld- can yield insights into the causes of sure pregnancy. These extended bouts work by Getz. monogamy. may help to facilitate the formation of One of the Þrst surprises that came monogamous social bonds. 100 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN June 1993 Copyright 1993 Scientific American, Inc. to male odors, levels of norepinephrine, vomeronasal system. The stimulation of luteinizing hormone begins a cascade of a neurotransmitter, and luteinizing hor- the olfactory system and the secretion of chemical and neural events that stimu- moneÐreleasing hormone (LHRH) change LHRH cause the pituitary gland to re- lates the ovary to secrete gonadal ste- within minutes. These biochemical lease a surge of luteinizing hormone into roids. Two of the most important ste- events occurred within the area of the ol- the bloodstream. In conjunction with roids secreted are estradiol, a potent factory bulb that receives input from the other endocrine changes, the release of kind of estrogen, and progesterone. Copyright 1993 Scientific American, Inc. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN June 1993 101 PRAIRIE VOLE (MONOGAMOUS) FEMALE MALE MEADOW VOLE (NONMONOGAMOUS) FEMALE MALE 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 TIME IN NEST WITH PUPS (PERCENT) PARENTAL CARE demonstrated by prairie voles far exceeds that shown by nonmonogamous meadow voles. The diÝerence is most apparent with male prairie voles, which are with the pups four times as often as male meadow voles are. Might estrogen and progesterone also gins. This rise in progesterone probably and Syrian hamsters become nonrecep- be involved in monogamous behav- helps to regulate the duration of sexual tive after about 45 minutes of mating. ior? In collaboration with Janice M. activity by bringing these rodents into It is possible that the lengthy sexual Bahr of the University of Illinois, we and out of heat. In contrast, we found interactions of prairie voles help the searched for patterns of gonadal steroid that in prairie voles progesterone lev- sperm enter the uterus and reach the production that varied between estrus els in the blood did not increase until egg. Studies of rats by Norman T. Adler and nonestrus female prairie voles and many hours after coitus began. of the University of Pennsylvania have compared the results with data from The delayed secretion of progester- shown that complex patterns of sexu- nonmonogamous species. Estradiol, a one explains an observation made in al behavior can inßuence the release of hormone known to be essential in in- previous studies: that female prairie hormones and alter the ability of sperm ducing estrus in rodents, was elevat- voles in their Þrst estrus mate for pro- to enter the femaleÕs reproductive tract ed only in female prairie voles in heat. longed periods. In our laboratory, Di- and fertilize an egg. It declined after mating. This pattern ane M. Witt observed that when the fe- Yet improving the chances of fertil- is similar to that displayed by polyga- male was in natural estrus, males and ization is probably not the sole reason mous rodents. Analysis of the patterns females continued to engage in bouts for these extended bouts of mating. of progesterone levels, however, pre- of mating for about 30 to 40 hours. Once mating begins, females ovulate sented an unexpected Þnding. In the This extended mating period contrasts within about 12 hours, and successful nonmonogamous rats and montane sharply to that seen in nonmonoga- pregnancy can occur shortly thereafter. voles, progesterone is released in the mous species. Mating in meadow and Thus, prairie voles in their Þrst heat bloodstream shortly after mating be- montane voles persists for a few hours, continue to copulate for hours after they have met the requirements for 18 pregnancy. We suspect that, like humans and 16 some other primates, prairie voles may copulate to facilitate the formation of 14 monogamous social bonds. Protracted 12 mating would be particularly crucial for prairie voles that are interacting for the 10 Þrst time, because they need to estab- PRAIRIE VOLES lish their lifelong monogamous bond. 8 Indeed, some evidence for this idea comes from observations of females 6 that have previously mated and become 4 MEADOW VOLES NUMBER OF MALE-FEMALE PAIRS 2 CAPTURED PER TRAPPING SESSION MALE-FEMALE PAIRS of prairie voles are caught far more frequently than are such 0 pairs of meadow voles.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Emory Health
    Health care for the working poor 8 After cancer, what next? 12 Smallpox chronicles 25 PATIENT CARE, RESEARCH, AND EDUCATION FROM Spring 2010 THE WOODRUFF HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER Why do voles fall in love? And what that means for human health. 2 FEATURE LISTENING TO THE HORMONES CouplingBy Sylvia Wrobel Monogamy—vole style What does love—or at least monogamy—have to do with autism, schizophrenia, and other conditions with deficits in socialcial awarenessawareness and attachment? Larry Young (left) believes his quirky little prairie voles hold some answers. Once mating is over, fidelity does not come naturally to the vast majority of species.. Even within species whose members do engage in social bonding, like humans, some individuals are better at it than others. The popular question was, “Why do voles fall In the 1990s, Young (William P. Timmie in love?” The answer, said the scientists, was that oxytocin created lifelong attachment. Professor of Psychiatry at Emory and chief of behavioral neuroscience at Yerkes National Primate Research Center) and Tom Insel (then director of Yerkes and now director of the National Institute of Mental Health) created a scientific and media storm when they reported that the surprisingly ubiquitous and long-lasting monogamy exhibited by a species of voles is attributable to hormones. The popular ques- tion was, “Why do voles fall in love?” The answer, said the scientists, was that oxytocin—the same hormone released during labor, delivery, and breast feeding in humans and that promotes mother-infant bonding— creates the female prairie vole’s lifelong attachment to her male partner.
    [Show full text]
  • Microtus Ochrogaster) from the Southern Plains of Texas and Oklahoma
    OCCASIONAL PAPERS Museum of Texas Tech University Number 235 5 May 2004 HISTORICAL ZOOGEOGRAPHY AND TAXONOMIC STATUS OF THE PRAIRIE VOLE (MICROTUS OCHROGASTER) FROM THE SOUTHERN PLAINS OF TEXAS AND OKLAHOMA FREDERICK B. STANGL, JR., JIM R. GOETZE, AND KIMBERLY D. SPRADLING The prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) today is with distinct cranial characters andpale pelage colora­ considered a species ofthe Great Plains, whose range tion, they described M. o. taylori. extends from the interior grasslands ofsouthern Canada to central Oklahoma and the northernTexas Panhandle, Choate and Williams (1978) perfonned a mor­ and is generally bordered by the Rocky Mountains to phometric analysis ofthe prairie vole, which included the west and the eastern deciduous woodlands (Bee et material reported onby Hibbard and Rinker (1943) as al. 1981; Hall 1981; Hoffmann andKoeppl 1985; Caire M. o. taylori. Each of their external body measure­ et al. 1990; Stalling 1990). Duringthe late Pleistocene, ments and four of the seven cranial characters (skull the species occurred throughout much ofTexas, leav­ length, zygomatic breadth, mastoidal breadth, and least ing fossil evidence as far south as the Edwards Pla­ interorbital breadth) exhibited significant geographic teau and parts ofthe GulfCoast (Dalquest and Schultz variation. While no geographic patterns were evident 1992; Graham 1987). The species retreated north­ to suggest subspecific levels of differentiation, popu­ ward with the advent ofincreasingly arid climate dur­ lations from the Dakotas to Kansas demonstrated a ing the Holocene. At least one isolated population, M. slight north-to-south elinal increase in size of cranial o. ludovicianus, was stranded during this time, and is characters.
    [Show full text]
  • Young, L.J., & Hammock E.A.D. (2007)
    Update TRENDS in Genetics Vol.23 No.5 Research Focus On switches and knobs, microsatellites and monogamy Larry J. Young1 and Elizabeth A.D. Hammock2 1 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, 954 Gatewood Road, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA 2 Vanderbilt Kennedy Center and Department of Pharmacology, 465 21st Avenue South, MRBIII, Room 8114, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA Comparative studies in voles have suggested that a formation. In male prairie voles, infusion of vasopressin polymorphic microsatellite upstream of the Avpr1a locus facilitates the formation of partner preferences in the contributes to the evolution of monogamy. A recent study absence of mating [7]. The distribution of V1aR in the challenged this hypothesis by reporting that there is no brain differs markedly between the socially monogamous relationship between microsatellite structure and mon- and socially nonmonogamous vole species [8]. Site-specific ogamy in 21 vole species. Although the study demon- pharmacological manipulations and viral-vector-mediated strates that the microsatellite is not a universal genetic gene-transfer experiments in prairie, montane and mea- switch that determines mating strategy, the findings do dow voles suggest that the species differences in Avpr1a not preclude a substantial role for Avpr1a in regulating expression in the brain underlie the species differences in social behaviors associated with monogamy. social bonding among these three closely related species of vole [3,6,9,10]. Single genes and social behavior Microsatellites and monogamy The idea that a single gene can markedly influence Analysis of the Avpr1a loci in the four vole species complex social behaviors has recently received consider- mentioned so far (prairie, montane, meadow and pine voles) able attention [1,2].
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Bog Lemming, Synaptomys Cooperi,Andthe Mammals: Their Natural History, Classification, and Meadow Vole, Microtus Pennsylvanicus,Invirginia
    Synaptomys cooperi (Baird, 1858) SBLE W. Mark Ford and Joshua Laerm CONTENT AND TAXONOMIC COMMENTS There are eight subspecies of the southern bog lem- ming (Synaptomys cooperi) recognized, four of which occur in the South: S. c. gossii, S. c. helaletes, S. c. kentucki, and S. c. stonei (Wetzel 1955, Barbour 1956, Hall 1981, Linzey 1983, Long 1987). However, Whitaker and Hamilton (1998) indicate that S. c. gossii, S. c. kentucki, and S. c. stonei could be referable to S. c. cooperi.The literature was reviewed by Linzey (1983). DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS The southern bog lemming is a robust, short-tailed vole with a broad head, small ears, and small eyes. Its measurements are: total length, 119–154 mm; tail, 13–25 mm; hind foot, 16–24 mm; ear, 8–14 mm; weight, 20–50 g. The dental formula for this species is: I 1/1, C 0/0, P 0/0, M 3/3 = 16 (Figure 1). The pel- age is bright chestnut to dark grizzled brown dor- sally, grading into silver grayish white ventrally, with gray to brown feet and tail. The southern bog lemming readily is distinguished from other voles by its short tail (usually less than hind foot length), pres- ence of a shallow longitudinal groove along upper incisors, and deep reentrant angles on molars. See keys for details. CONSERVATION STATUS The southern bog lemming has a global rank of Secure (NatureServe 2007). It is listed as Secure in Virginia and Apparently Secure in Kentucky and Tennessee. It is listed as Vulnerable in North Carolina, Imperiled in Arkansas, and Critically Imperiled in Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science (1988) Volume 98 P
    Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science (1988) Volume 98 p. 553-559. BARN OWL FOOD HABITS IN INDIANA Allen R. Parker Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish & Wildlife Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program 300 West First St. Bloomington, Indiana 47403 ABSTRACT: Pellets from barn owls {Tyto alba) were col- lected in Indiana from 1983 to 1987. Skulls, mandibles, palate fragments, and non-principal prey parts were identified and tallied. Prey biomass was estimated using weights from the literature. Of the 12,905 prey items identified, 66% of them were voles {Microtus spp. and Synaptomys cooperi). Major prey buffer species were deer mice {Peromyscus sp.) and short-tailed shrews {Blarina brevicauda). Regional examination of food habits was conducted on 16 areas, and vole dependence ranged from 31% to 80%. The meadow vole {M. pennsylvanicus) was the most important prey species in all but the southwestern coun- ties, where the prairie vole {M. ochrogaster) was most impor- tant. Seasonally, food habits varied only slightly. The mean weight per prey item was lower in Indiana than were those reported for other States. INTRODUCTION The common barn owl {Tyto alba pratincola) is on endangered species lists in 7 midwestern states (Rosenburg, 1986), and its decline has been attributed to changes in agricultural practices (Colvin, 1985). Past research in the Ohio Valley and the eastern United States has revealed that the meadow vole {Microtus penn- sylvanicus) is the primary prey of the barn owl (Colvin and McLean, 1986; Pearson and Pearson, 1947; Rosenburg, 1986). Analysis of small collections of barn owl pellets from Indiana supported this finding (Castrale, et al., 1983).
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat, Home Range, Diet and Demography of the Water Vole (Arvicola Amphibious): Patch-Use in a Complex Wetland Landscape
    _________________________________________________________________________Swansea University E-Theses Habitat, home range, diet and demography of the water vole (Arvicola amphibious): Patch-use in a complex wetland landscape. Neyland, Penelope Jane How to cite: _________________________________________________________________________ Neyland, Penelope Jane (2011) Habitat, home range, diet and demography of the water vole (Arvicola amphibious): Patch-use in a complex wetland landscape.. thesis, Swansea University. http://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa42744 Use policy: _________________________________________________________________________ This item is brought to you by Swansea University. Any person downloading material is agreeing to abide by the terms of the repository licence: copies of full text items may be used or reproduced in any format or medium, without prior permission for personal research or study, educational or non-commercial purposes only. The copyright for any work remains with the original author unless otherwise specified. The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder. Permission for multiple reproductions should be obtained from the original author. Authors are personally responsible for adhering to copyright and publisher restrictions when uploading content to the repository. Please link to the metadata record in the Swansea University repository, Cronfa (link given in the citation reference above.) http://www.swansea.ac.uk/library/researchsupport/ris-support/ Habitat, home range, diet and demography of the water vole(Arvicola amphibius): Patch-use in a complex wetland landscape A Thesis presented by Penelope Jane Neyland for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Conservation Ecology Research Team (CERTS) Department of Biosciences College of Science Swansea University ProQuest Number: 10807513 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxytocin Receptor Distribution Reflects Social Organization in Monogamous and Polygamous Voles (Microtine/Affiliation/Parental Behavior/Amygdala/Septum) THOMAS R
    Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 89, pp. 5981-5985, July 1992 Neurobiology Oxytocin receptor distribution reflects social organization in monogamous and polygamous voles (microtine/affiliation/parental behavior/amygdala/septum) THOMAS R. INSEL AND LAWRENCE E. SHAPIRO Laboratory of Neurophysiology, National Institute of Mental Health, P.O. Box 289, Poolesville, MD 20837 Communicated by Peter Marler, March 20, 1992 ABSTRACT The neuropeptide oxytocin has been impli- form long-term monogamous relationships and show high cated in the mediation of several forms of affiliative behavior levels of parental care (5-7). Even in the laboratory, adult including parental care, grooming, and sex behavior. Here we prairie voles usually sit side-by-side with a mate and attack demonstrate that species from the genusMicrotus (voles) selected unfamiliar adults; both sexes display parental care (8-10). In for differences in social affiliation show contrasting patterns of contrast, montane vole adults live in isolated burrows and oxytocin receptor expression in brain. By in vitro receptor show no evidence of monogamy (11). In the laboratory, autoradiography with an iodinated oxytocin analogue, specific montane voles appear minimally parental and generally binding to brain oxytocin receptors was observed in both the spend little time in contact with conspecifics (10, 12). Species monogamous prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) and the polyg- differences in social behavior are evident very early in life, as amous montane vole (Microtus montanus). In the prairie vole, prairie vole young show marked increases in ultrasonic calls oxytocin receptor density was highest in the prelimbic cortex, and glucocorticoid secretion in response to social isolation, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, nucleus accumbens, midline whereas montane vole pups show little if any behavioral or nuclei of the thalamus, and the lateral aspects of the amygdala.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Mammal Foraging and Population Responses to Northern Conifer Mast
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 1-28-2013 12:00 AM Small mammal foraging and population responses to northern conifer mast Nikhil Lobo The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Dr. John S. Millar The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Biology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © Nikhil Lobo 2013 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Lobo, Nikhil, "Small mammal foraging and population responses to northern conifer mast" (2013). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 1107. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1107 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SMALL MAMMAL FORAGING AND POPULATION RESPONSES TO NORTHERN CONIFER MAST (Spine title: Interactions between conifer seeds and small mammals) (Thesis format: Integrated Article) by Nikhil Lobo Graduate Program in Biology, Collaborative Program in Environment & Sustainability A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Nikhil Lobo 2013 THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies CERTIFICATE OF EXAMINATION Supervisor Examiners ______________________________ ______________________________ Dr. John S. Millar Dr. David Sherry Supervisory Committee ______________________________ Dr. Hugh Henry ______________________________ Dr. Liana Zanette ______________________________ Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlling Vole Damage Stephen M
    ® ® University of Nebraska–Lincoln Extension, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources Know how. Know now. G887 (Revised September 2011) Controlling Vole Damage Stephen M. Vantassel, Extension Project Coordinator — Wildlife Damage Management Scott E. Hygnstrom, Extension Specialist — Wildlife Damage Management Dennis M. Ferraro, Extension Educator This NebGuide provides information about voles, the damage they cause, and ways to prevent and control damage problems. Voles are small, mouse-like rodents that exist throughout Nebraska. Though commonly called meadow or field mice, their short tails (about 1 inch long), stocky build, and small eyes distinguish them from true mice (Figure 1). Voles can cause problems by damaging lawns, gardens, tree plantings, and other plants. Vole Facts The prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster), the most com- Figure 1. Prairie vole. (Photo: NEBRASKAland Magazine/Nebraska mon species, occurs statewide. Meadow voles (Microtus Game and Parks Commission.) pennsylvanicus) also are very common but cover a slightly Voles are an important source of food for many preda- smaller geographical area. Pine voles, or woodland voles tors, including snakes, hawks, owls, coyotes, weasels, foxes, (Microtus pinetorum), generally are confined to the south- mink, and badgers. Mortality rates for voles are very high. eastern edge of Nebraska along the Missouri river. Life expectancy in the wild often does not exceed 2 months, Voles are small with adults weighing 1 to 2 ounces. Their with few living longer than 16 months. overall adult body length varies from 4½ to 7 inches in the The breeding season for all voles encompasses most of meadow and prairie voles, to about 3 to 5½ inches in the pine the year with peaks occurring in the spring and fall.
    [Show full text]
  • Prairie Vole Microtus Ochrogaster
    prairie vole Microtus ochrogaster Kingdom: Animalia Division/Phylum: Chordata Class: Mammalia Order: Rodentia Family: Cricetidae ILLINOIS STATUS common, native FEATURES The tan and dark hairs on a prairie vole’s back give it a salt-and-pepper appearance. The belly fur is golden, yellow or red. The upper side of the tail is about the same color as the back while the lower side of the tail is lighter than the belly. BEHAVIORS The prairie vole may be found statewide in Illinois. It lives in grassy fields such as ungrazed pastures, alfalfa fields, roadsides and prairies. This mammal eats seeds, roots, mosses, alfalfa, blue grasses, clovers, dandelions and goldenrods. It is active during the night and day using a system of runways to get from one burrow to another. This vole uses several aggressive behaviors against other voles, among them “boxing,” chasing, lunging, standing upright, threatening and wrestling. Mating may occur year round although it is more frequent in spring and fall. Litter size is normally three to five. The large nest is built under ground in a part of the burrow system. Young are helpless at birth but develop rapidly and are able to live on their own at about two and one-half weeks of age. Life expectancy of this vole is about one to two months. HABITATS Aquatic Habitats wet prairies and fens Woodland Habitats none Prairie and Edge Habitats black soil prairie; dolomite prairie; edge; gravel prairie; hill prairie; sand prairie; shrub prairie © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2017. Biodiversity of Illinois. .
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Variation in the Dietary Preferences of the Montane Vole
    Pinter et al.: Seasonal Variation in the Dietary Preferences of the Montane Vole SEASONAL VARIATION IN THE DIETARY PREFERENCES OF THE MONTANE VOLE, MICROTUS MONTANUS . • AELITA J. PINTER + DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS + NEW ORLEANS NORMAN C. NEGUS+ PATRICIA]. BERGER BIOLOGY DEPARTMENT + UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SALT LAKE CITY ,. + OBJECTIVES this project are twofold: (i) to identify the plant species that constitute the diet in natural populations From 1987 through 1989 we undertook a of M. montanus and (2) to determine seasonal food study in Grand Teton National Park and on the upper preferences in relation to the availability of plant Green River, Sublette County, Wyoming, to measure species and to the age, sex and cohorts of the growth rates of cohorts of montane voles, (Microtus montane vole. montanus) born in May, June, July, and August. We documented dramatic differences in growth rate among cohorts, in a given year and between years + METHODS (Negus, Berger and Pinter, 1992). We hypothesized that these are flexible responses to several The work was carried out at two field sites, environmental cues. Is this, however, a phenotypic approximately 160 km apart, in northwestern response to an array of environmental cues, or is it Wyoming. One study area is within Grand Teton actually a reflection of differential utilization of plant National Park (GTNP site). The other is located species that may exhibit different nutritional levels? along the upper Green River (GR site}, near the This question cannot be answered at the present since boundary of the Bridger-Teton National Forest, virtually nothing is known about dietary preferences Sublette County, Wyoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammals of Scotts Bluff
    National Park Service Scotts Bluff U.S. Department of the Interior Scotts Bluff National Monument Nebraska Mammals of Scotts Bluff Deer If you happen to see a deer in the park, it would be one of two species, the mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) or the white-tailed deer (Odocoileus viginianus). For more information, ask a ranger for the Site Bulletin “Deer of the Prai- rie”. White-tailed Deer Mule Deer Coyote The coyote (Canis latrans) is a common animal found in the park, but rarely seen. Their hair is a grizzled gray color and their bushy tail has a black tip. They usually weigh 20-40 pounds but can weigh more. The coyote is usually carnivo- rous, although it will eat just about anything from grasshop- pers, mice, fruit, toads, snakes and rabbits. They will look for circling magpies and ravens to help them to food sources. Coyotes are more frequently heard than seen. They enjoy vo- calizing at dusk, dawn or during the night. Man is the biggest predator of the coyote. Cottontail The Eastern Cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) is the most common Rabbit rabbit in North America. It is chunky red-brown or gray-brown with large hind feet, long ears, large brown eyes, and a short fluffy white tail. Its underside fur is white. The cottontail’s diet includes grasses, fruits and vegetables in the spring and summer, and twigs and bark in the winter. The cottontail is a very territorial animal. They do not dig burrows, but rest in a form, a shallow depression. Predators include hawks, eagles, owls, foxes, coyotes, bobcats and weasels.
    [Show full text]