CAES Strawberry 10 2009

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CAES Strawberry 10 2009 Managing Arthropod Pests in Strawberries A Twenty Year Odyssey Frank Zalom Dept. of Entomology University of California, Davis ENTOMOLOGY Key Arthropod Pests Spider Mites Lygus Bugs Lepidoptera corn earworm beet armyworm cutworms Thrips Occasional/Unusual Arthropod Pests Cyclamen Mite Greenhouse Whitefly Vinegar Flies Light Brown Apple Moth My approach to pest management Crisis - Management - short term longer term Lygus bug Lygus bug Management - Sampling Thresholds Phenology model Control - Manage alternate hosts Insecticides Bug-vacs Lygus bug Management - Sampling Thresholds Phenology model Lygus bug Control - Manage alternate hosts Insecticides Bug-vacs?? Lygus - issues and needs Loss of Lannate (methomyl) Pyrethroid and OP resistance New products and combinations Rimon (novaluron) - Section 18 Clutch (clothianidin) - IR-4 Beleaf (flonicamid) - IR-4 Monitoring and treatment timing Lygus life cycle and seasonal cycle - Oxnard Application methodology (bioassays) Lygus species composition Lygus - issues Pyrethroid resistance Weeds Danitol - fenpropathrin First Year Prunedale, July, 2008 Second Year Lygus collected from - Weeds First Year Field Second Year Field 10.67 oz in 100 gal 2007 sprays - 1 Brigade + 2 Danitol 2008 sprays - 3 Brigade + 1 Danitol Two spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Two spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Management - Chemicals - monitoring and thresholds Varietal susceptibility (20+ years) Plant vigor - vernalization, day-neutral varieties Biological controls - predatory mites Two spotted spider mite Acaricides - new products registered since 1995 Product Active Ingredient Primary Target Site of Action IRAC # Kelthane Dicofol Unknown mode of action Uncl. Vendex Fenbutatin oxide Oxidative phosphorylation inhibitor 12B Omite Propargite Oxidative phosphorylation inhibitor 12C Agri-Mek Abamectin Chloride channel activator 6 Savey Hexythiazox Unknown mode of action (mite growth regulator) 10A Zeal Etoxazole Unknown mode of action (mite growth regulator) 10B Acramite Bifenazate Neuronal inhibitor (unknown mode of action) 25 Oberon Spiromesifen Inhibitor of lipid synthesis 23 Kanemite Acequinocyl Site III electron transport inhibitor 20B Fujimite 1 Fenpyroximate Site I electron transport inhibitor 21 Ecotrol Organic oils Botanicals, exempt from tolerance Uncl. GC Mite Organic oils & Botanicals, exempt from tolerance Uncl. extracts 1 Not registered for use on strawberries VarietalVarietal susceptibilitysusceptibility SelvaSelva 3500 Day Neutral Varieties 3000 Treated Varietal susceptibility Untreated 2500 UC Davis Strawberry 2000 Field Station, 1500 Watsonville, 2008 1000 500 Total avg yield (g/season/plant) 0 3.114-3 3.149-8 3.92-6 Albion Portola DiamanteMonterey San Andreas 4500 Short Day Varieties, 2008 4000 Treated 3500 Untreated 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Total avg yield (g/season/plant) 0 4.2-5 4.38-4 4.9-5 2.132-6 4.44-603 CaminoPalomarVentana Predatory mites Almost 30% of California strawberry growers release or conserve predatory mites. Acaricide selectivity is important Phytoseiulus persimilis Acaricide selectivity Contact and residual bioassays on leaves of treated strawberry plants up to 37 days after application Direct and side effects of - Acaramite = Bifenazate Agri-mek = Abamectin Kanemite = Acequinocyl Oberon = Spiromesifen Zeal = Etoxazole Fujimite = Fenpyroximate NR Mean ± SD percent P. persimilis female mortality 72 h after exposure strawberry leaflets treated with the label dose. Mean ± SD % mortality Days after treatment Trea tme nt 3 6 10 >14 IOBC Control 0a 0a 0a 0a A Bifenaz a te 0a 0a 0a 0a A Etoxazole 0a 0a 0a 0a A Spirom esifen 0a 0a 0a 0a A Abam ectin 26.4±1 2.3b 26.4±1 2.3b 0a 0a A Fenpy roxima te 100c 100c 100b 0a B Acequino cyl 100c 0a 0a 0a A Within columns means (±SD) followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at P=0.05 by LSD. IOBC categories: A = short lived (<5 d), B = slightly persistent (5-15 d), C = moderately persistent (16-30 d), D = persistent (>30 d) Mean ± SD P. persimilis fecundity (eggs/female/day) recorded 72 h after exposure to strawberry leaflets treated with the label dose of formulated products. Days after treatment Trea tment 3 6 10 14 17 24 30 37 Contro l 4.2±0.3a 4.1±0.3a 4.1±0.2a 4.0±0.3a 3.8±0.3a 4.3±0.2a 4.3±0.1a 4.0±0.3a Bifenazate 0.0±0.0c 1.9±0.1b 1.6±0.1b 2.9±0.2b 4.4±0.2a 4.5±0.2a 4.4±0.1a 4.0±0.3a Etoxazo le 1.8±0.2b 1.5±0.2bc 1.2±0 .2b 3.1±0.2b 4.4±0.2a 4.4±0.2a 4.4±0.1a 4.0±0.1a Sp iromes ifen 0.1±0.0c 0.8±0.2cd 1.1±0.1b 4.1±0.2a 4.1±0.2a 4.2±0.2a 4.0±0.3a 4.0±0.3a Abamect in 1.2±0.1b 1.7±0.4b 1.7±0.3b 3.3±0.2b 4.1±0.2a 4.1±0.1a 4.1±0.1a 4.2±0.2a Fenpy roximate 0.3±0.1c 0.4±0.2d 0.2±0.1c 1.7±0.1c 1.3±0.1b 1.3±0.2b 4.2±0.2a 4.1±0.2a Acequ inocy l 1.4±0.3b 3.9±0.2a 3.9±0.3a 4.1±0.3a 4.4±0.2a 4.4±0.1a 4.3±0.1a 4.3±0.1a Within column means (±SD) followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at P=0.05 by LSD. Mean ± SD P. persimilis fertility recorded 72 h after exposure to strawberry leaflets treated with the label dose of formulated products. Days after treatment Trea tment 3 6 10 14 17 24 30 37 Contro l 96.7±1.4a 98.3±0.8a 98.0±1.0a 97.8±1.3a 97.4±1.3a 99.0±1.0a 100±0.0a 97.8±1.4a Bifenazate 0.0±0.0b 99.0±1.0a 100±0.0a 97.9±3.4a 62.5±3.4c 99.1±0.9a 99.2±0.8a 98.5±0.9a Etoxazo le 0.0±0.0b 0.0±0.0b 0.0±0.0b 0.0±0.0b 0.0±0.0d 0.0±0.0b 0.0±0.0b 0.0±0.0b Sp iromes ifen 0.0±0.0b 0.0±0.0b 3.9±2.4b 97.7±1.1a 76.7±5.3b 97.3±1.1a 99.2±0.8a 97.4±1.4a Abamect in 0.0±0.0b 99.1±0.9a 99.2±0.9a 98.6±0.6a 97.0±0.9a 98.1±1.2a 99.2±0.8a 97.9±1.3a Fenpy roximate 0.0±0.0b 0.0±0.0b 0.0±0.0b 0.0±0.0b 0.0±0.0d 0.0±0.0b 0.0±0.0b 0.0±0.0b Acequ inocy l 99.2±0.8a 100±0.0a 99.1±0.8a 99.2±0.8a 99.0±0.6a 98.7±0.8a 99.1±0.6a 97.2±1.4a Within column means (±SD) followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at P=0.05 by LSD. Total effects (E) of acaricide residues on P. persimilis recorded 72 h after exposure to strawberry leaflets treated with the labeled dose of formulated products. Days after treatment Treat ment 3 6 10 14 17 24 30 37 IOBC Bifena zate 100 54 61 29 26 0 0 0 B Etoxa zole 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 D Spiromes ifen 100 100 99 0 12 0 0 0 B Abamect in 100 70 59 19 3 2 1 2 B Fenp yroximate 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 D Aceq uinocyl 100 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 A IOBC categories: A = short lived (<5 d), B = slightly persistent (5-15 d), C = moderately persistent (16-30 d), D = persistent (>30 d) Lepidoptera Damage Fruit feeding Crown damage Processing corn earworm beet armyworm cutworms Lepidoptera Issues and needs Lannate alternatives Sampling Phenology models corn earworm beet armyworm cutworms Lepidoptera Corn Earworm Control, Orange County H zea damaged Treatment Rate (form/A) fruit per 20 plants Untreated -- 12.75 ± 5.68 Lannate 1.0 bl 3.67 ± 0.58* Intrepid 12.0 fl oz 4.67 ± 3.06* Rimon1 12.0 fl oz 3.00 ± 1.41* Synapse 24WG 2 2.0 oz 3.00 ± 2.65* Synapse 24WG 2 3.0 oz 4.33 ± 1.53* Radiant SG 6.0 fl oz 4.00 ± 2.65* 1 Section 18 emergency registration 2 Not registered for use on strawberries Application date 4/13/2007 Harvest date 5/2/2007 ANOV statistics - F=4.0938, df=6,20, P=0.0140 Western Flower Thrips Frankliniella occidentalis Damage - • 'bronzing' from fruit feeding • flower abortion from feeding on strawberry blossoms Threshold - 10 thrips per flower Type I Bronzing Bronzing 3 types identified Type I Type III Type II Watsonville Bronzing Experiment (Impact sprinklers and no sprinklers with 6 treatments) I II I Treatments Exp. I: 1. center strip/Mar. 1 4 ex1 5 3 1 4 2 5 3 6 1 4 ex2 5 3 2. clear plastic/Dec. 2 5 ex1 4 1 2 5 1 6 2 5 2 5 ex2 4 1 3. gray/green mulch 6 3 ex1 6 2 3 6 4 3 1 4 6 3 ex2 6 2 4. shadecloth hoops 5. deficit irrigation 3 5 ex2 1 4 1 6 3 5 6 3 3 5 ex1 1 4 6. commercial spray 4 1 ex2 2 5 2 5 4 1 2 5 4 1 ex1 2 5 6 2 ex2 3 6 3 4 2 6 4 1 6 2 ex1 3 6 Sprinklers run for 15 minutes (= 1/8 to 1/4 inch precipitation) after each harvest (twice a week) from April 23 to June 21 Deficit irrigation - drip tapes shut off from April 11 to June 4 Type III fruit bronzing as a function of treatments, 2001 Number of bronzed fruit Treatment Sprinkling Mean ± SEM Clear, Full in Dec Not Sprinkled 142.0 ± 6.8 B Clear, Strip in March Not Sprinkled 176.3 ± 32.1 AB Commercial chemical Not Sprinkled 58.5 ± 5.9 CD Gray/Green in Dec Not Sprinkled 168.5 ± 15.8 AB Irrig.
Recommended publications
  • Genetics of Foraging Behavior of the Predatory Mite, Phytoseiulus Persimilis
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by K-State Research Exchange GENETICS OF FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF THE PREDATORY MITE, PHYTOSEIULUS PERSIMILIS by BHANU S. KONAKANDLA B.S., Angrau, India, 1999 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Entomology College of Agriculture KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2006 Approved by: Major Professor David C. Margolies Co-Major Professor Yoonseong Park ABSTRACT Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) is a specialist predator on tetranychid mites, especially on the twospotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). The foraging environment of the predatory mites consists of prey colonies distributed in patches within and among plants. Quantitative genetic studies have shown genetic variation in, and phenotypic correlations among, several foraging behaviors within populations of the predatory mite, P. persimilis. The correlations between patch location, patch residence, consumption and oviposition imply possible fitness trade-offs. We used molecular techniques to investigate genetic variation underlying the foraging behaviors. However, these genetic studies require a sufficiently large amount of DNA which was a limiting factor in our studies. Therefore, we developed a method for obtaining DNA from a single mite by using a chelex extraction followed by whole genome amplification. Whole genome amplification from a single mite provided us with a large quantity of high-quality DNA. We obtained more than a ten thousand-fold amplified DNA from a single mite using 0.01ng as template DNA. Sequence polymorphisms of P. persimilis were analyzed for nuclear DNA Inter Transcribed Spacers (ITS1 & ITS2) and for a mitochondrial12S rRNA.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control of Insect Pests in the Tropics - M
    TROPICAL BIOLOGY AND CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT – Vol. III - Biological Control of Insect Pests In The Tropics - M. V. Sampaio, V. H. P. Bueno, L. C. P. Silveira and A. M. Auad BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INSECT PESTS IN THE TROPICS M. V. Sampaio Instituto de Ciências Agrária, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Brazil V. H. P. Bueno and L. C. P. Silveira Departamento de Entomologia, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Brazil A. M. Auad Embrapa Gado de Leite, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Brazil Keywords: Augmentative biological control, bacteria, classical biological control, conservation of natural enemies, fungi, insect, mite, natural enemy, nematode, predator, parasitoid, pathogen, virus. Contents 1. Introduction 2. Natural enemies of insects and mites 2.1. Entomophagous 2.1.1. Predators 2.1.2. Parasitoids 2.2. Entomopathogens 2.2.1. Fungi 2.2.2. Bacteria 2.2.3. Viruses 2.2.4. Nematodes 3. Categories of biological control 3.1. Natural Biological Control 3.2. Applied Biological Control 3.2.1. Classical Biological Control 3.2.2. Augmentative Biological Control 3.2.3. Conservation of Natural Enemies 4. Conclusions Glossary UNESCO – EOLSS Bibliography Biographical Sketches Summary SAMPLE CHAPTERS Biological control is a pest control method with low environmental impact and small contamination risk for humans, domestic animals and the environment. Several success cases of biological control can be found in the tropics around the world. The classical biological control has been applied with greater emphasis in Australia and Latin America, with many success cases of exotic natural enemies’ introduction for the control of exotic pests. Augmentative biocontrol is used in extensive areas in Latin America, especially in the cultures of sugar cane, coffee, and soybeans.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Arthropod Groups What Is Entomology?
    Entomology 340 Introduction to Arthropod Groups What is Entomology? The study of insects (and their near relatives). Species Diversity PLANTS INSECTS OTHER ANIMALS OTHER ARTHROPODS How many kinds of insects are there in the world? • 1,000,0001,000,000 speciesspecies knownknown Possibly 3,000,000 unidentified species Insects & Relatives 100,000 species in N America 1,000 in a typical backyard Mostly beneficial or harmless Pollination Food for birds and fish Produce honey, wax, shellac, silk Less than 3% are pests Destroy food crops, ornamentals Attack humans and pets Transmit disease Classification of Japanese Beetle Kingdom Animalia Phylum Arthropoda Class Insecta Order Coleoptera Family Scarabaeidae Genus Popillia Species japonica Arthropoda (jointed foot) Arachnida -Spiders, Ticks, Mites, Scorpions Xiphosura -Horseshoe crabs Crustacea -Sowbugs, Pillbugs, Crabs, Shrimp Diplopoda - Millipedes Chilopoda - Centipedes Symphyla - Symphylans Insecta - Insects Shared Characteristics of Phylum Arthropoda - Segmented bodies are arranged into regions, called tagmata (in insects = head, thorax, abdomen). - Paired appendages (e.g., legs, antennae) are jointed. - Posess chitinous exoskeletion that must be shed during growth. - Have bilateral symmetry. - Nervous system is ventral (belly) and the circulatory system is open and dorsal (back). Arthropod Groups Mouthpart characteristics are divided arthropods into two large groups •Chelicerates (Scissors-like) •Mandibulates (Pliers-like) Arthropod Groups Chelicerate Arachnida -Spiders,
    [Show full text]
  • IOBC/WPRS Working Group “Integrated Plant Protection in Fruit
    IOBC/WPRS Working Group “Integrated Plant Protection in Fruit Crops” Subgroup “Soft Fruits” Proceedings of Workshop on Integrated Soft Fruit Production East Malling (United Kingdom) 24-27 September 2007 Editors Ch. Linder & J.V. Cross IOBC/WPRS Bulletin Bulletin OILB/SROP Vol. 39, 2008 The content of the contributions is in the responsibility of the authors The IOBC/WPRS Bulletin is published by the International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants, West Palearctic Regional Section (IOBC/WPRS) Le Bulletin OILB/SROP est publié par l‘Organisation Internationale de Lutte Biologique et Intégrée contre les Animaux et les Plantes Nuisibles, section Regionale Ouest Paléarctique (OILB/SROP) Copyright: IOBC/WPRS 2008 The Publication Commission of the IOBC/WPRS: Horst Bathon Luc Tirry Julius Kuehn Institute (JKI), Federal University of Gent Research Centre for Cultivated Plants Laboratory of Agrozoology Institute for Biological Control Department of Crop Protection Heinrichstr. 243 Coupure Links 653 D-64287 Darmstadt (Germany) B-9000 Gent (Belgium) Tel +49 6151 407-225, Fax +49 6151 407-290 Tel +32-9-2646152, Fax +32-9-2646239 e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] Address General Secretariat: Dr. Philippe C. Nicot INRA – Unité de Pathologie Végétale Domaine St Maurice - B.P. 94 F-84143 Montfavet Cedex (France) ISBN 978-92-9067-213-5 http://www.iobc-wprs.org Integrated Plant Protection in Soft Fruits IOBC/wprs Bulletin 39, 2008 Contents Development of semiochemical attractants, lures and traps for raspberry beetle, Byturus tomentosus at SCRI; from fundamental chemical ecology to testing IPM tools with growers.
    [Show full text]
  • Whiteflies in the Greenhouse Jen White
    Entfact-456 Whiteflies in the greenhouse Jen White General Biology Worldwide, there are over 1500 Whiteflies are “true bugs” (Hemiptera) species of whitefly, most of which are that feed on plant sap, much like aphids. inconspicuous and never reach densities Adults are very small (1/16 - 1/10 inch) high enough to cause damage to their host with powdery white wings. Females lay plants. A few species, however, are major eggs directly on the undersides of plant pests. Here in Kentucky, the most notable leaves. The eggs hatch into tiny are 1) the sweetpotato whitefly (Bemisia “crawlers” that walk a short distance before settling at a tabaci), and 2) the greenhouse whitefly (Trialeurodes feeding location. These nymphs lose their ability walk, and vaporarorium). The former is a confusing complex of remain in the same location for the rest of their development “biotypes” (currently considered multiple species) that are until they pupate and emerge as winged adults (Figure 1). The physically indistinguishable, but which have distinct biological entire whitefly life cycle takes about 3 weeks under favorable differences. For example, B biotype is also sometimes known as conditions, allowing populations to build quickly. Whiteflies do the silverleaf whitefly (also known as Bemisia argentifolii) not have a dormant stage that can withstand freezing because of the distinctive silvering damage it inflicts on plant temperatures. In climates that have winter freezes, such as leaves. B biotype is currently the most common in North Kentucky, whiteflies are year-round pests only in greenhouses. America, but a second biotype, Q biotype, is also present, and of particular concern because Q biotype is highly resistant to many classes of insecticide.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropod Pest Management in Greenhouses and Interiorscapes E
    Arthropod Pest Management in Greenhouses and Interiorscapes E-1011E-1011 OklahomaOklahoma CooperativeCooperative ExtensionExtension ServiceService DivisionDivision ofof AgriculturalAgricultural SciencesSciences andand NaturalNatural ResourcesResources OklahomaOklahoma StateState UniversityUniversity Arthropod Pest Management in Greenhouses and Interiorscapes E-1011 Eric J. Rebek Extension Entomologist/ Ornamentals and Turfgrass Specialist Michael A. Schnelle Extension Ornamentals/ Floriculture Specialist ArthropodArthropod PestPest ManagementManagement inin GreenhousesGreenhouses andand InteriorscapesInteriorscapes Insects and their relatives cause major plant ing a hand lens. damage in commercial greenhouses and interi- Aphids feed on buds, leaves, stems, and roots orscapes. Identification of key pests and an un- by inserting their long, straw-like, piercing-suck- derstanding of appropriate control measures are ing mouthparts (stylets) and withdrawing plant essential to guard against costly crop losses. With sap. Expanding leaves from damaged buds may be tightening regulations on conventional insecti- curled or twisted and attacked leaves often display cides and increasing consumer sensitivity to their chlorotic (yellow-white) speckles where cell con- use in public spaces, growers must seek effective tents have been removed. A secondary problem pest management alternatives to conventional arises from sugary honeydew excreted by aphids. chemical control. Management strategies cen- Leaves may appear shiny and become sticky from tered around
    [Show full text]
  • Life History of the Honey Bee Tracheal Mite (Acari: Tarsonemidae)
    ARTHROPOD BIOLOGY Life History of the Honey Bee Tracheal Mite (Acari: Tarsonemidae) JEFFERY S. PETTIS1 AND WILLIAM T. WILSON Honey Bee Research Unit, USDA-ARS, 2413 East Highway 83, Weslaco, TX 78596 Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 89(3): 368-374 (1996) ABSTRACT Data on the seasonal reproductive patterns of the honey bee tracheal mite, Acarapis woodi (Rennie), were obtained by dissecting host honey bees, Apis mellifera L., at intervals during their life span. Mite reproduction normally was limited to 1 complete gen- eration per host bee, regardless of host life span. However, limited egg laying by foundress progeny was observed. Longer lived bees in the fall and winter harbored mites that reproduced for a longer period than did mites in bees during spring and summer. Oviposition rate was relatively uniform at =0.85 eggs per female per day during the initial 16 d of adult bee life regardless of season. In all seasons, peak mite populations occurred in bees =24 d old, with egg laying declining rapidly beyond day 24 in spring and summer bees but more slowly in fall and winter bees. Stadial lengths of eggs and male and female larvae were 5, 4, and 5 d, respectively. Sex ratio ranged from 1.15:1 to 2.01:1, female bias, but because males are not known to migrate they would have been overestimated in the sampling scheme. Fecundity was estimated to be =21 offspring, assuming daughter mites laid limited eggs in tracheae before dispersal. Mortality of adult mites increased with host age; an estimate of 35 d for female mite longevity was indirectly obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Parameters of Phytoseiulus Macropilis (Banks) Fed with Tetranychus Urticae Koch (Acari: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae) in Laboratory G
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.13115 Original Article Reproductive parameters of Phytoseiulus macropilis (Banks) fed with Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae) in laboratory G. C. Souza-Pimentela*, P. R. Reisb, C. R. Bonattoc, J. P. Alvesc and M. F. Siqueirac aPostgraduate Program in Entomology, Universidade Federal de Lavras – UFLA, CP 3037, CEP 37200-000, Lavras, MG, Brazil bEmpresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais – EPAMIG/EcoCentro, CP 176, CEP 37200-000, Lavras, MG, Brazil cUniversidade Federal de Lavras – UFLA, CP 3037, CEP 37200-000, Lavras, MG, Brazil *e-mail: [email protected] Received: August 24, 2015 – Accepted: December 14, 2015 – Distributed: February 28, 2017 (With 1 figure) Abstract Predatory mites that belong to the Phytoseiidae family are one of the main natural enemies of phytophagous mites, thus allowing for their use as a biological control. Phytoseiulus macropilis (Banks, 1904) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) is among the main species of predatory mites used for this purpose. Tetranychus urticae Koch, 1836 (Acari: Tetranychidae) is considered to be one of the most important species of mite pests and has been described as attacking over 1,100 species of plants in 140 families with economic value. The objective of the present study was to investigate, in the laboratory, the reproductive parameters of the predatory mite P. macropilis when fed T. urticae. Experiments were conducted under laboratory conditions at 25 ± 2 °C of temperature, 70 ± 10% RH and 14 hours of photophase. In addition, biological aspects were evaluated and a fertility life table was established. The results of these experiments demonstrated that the longevity of adult female was 27.5 days and adult male was 29.0 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History Parameters of Trialeurodes Vaporariorum (Westwood) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) at Different Environmental Conditions on Two Bean Cultivars
    View metadata, citation452 and similar papers at core.ac.uk July - August 2009brought to you by CORE provided by Wageningen University & Research Publications ECOLOGY, BEHAVIOR AND BIONOMICS Life History Parameters of Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) at Different Environmental Conditions on Two Bean Cultivars MARIA R MANZANO1, JOOP C VAN LENTEREN2 1Depto. de Ciencias Agrícolas, Univ. Nacional de Colombia, sede Palmira, Cra. 32 Chapinero via a Candelaria, Colombia; [email protected]; 2Lab. of Entomology, Wageningen University, PO Box 8031, 6700 EH Wageningen, The Netherlands; [email protected] Edited by André L Lourenção - IAC Neotropical Entomology 38(4):452-458 (2009) Estadísticos VItales de Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) a Diferentes Condiciones Ambientales en Dos Cultivares de Fríjol RESUMEN - Se determinaron los estadísticos vitales de la mosca blanca Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood), una plaga importante del cultivo del fríjol en Colombia, en cámara ambiental en dos cultivares (cv.) de fríjol. La longevidad media de T. vaporariorum en el cv. Chocho fue mayor a 19°C (22.6 d), intermedia a 22°C (17.5 d) y menor a 26°C (5.9 d). En el cv. ICA-Pijao la longevidad media fue de 35.5 d a 19°C. La fecundidad media total fue 8.6, 32.6 y 33.3 huevos por hembra a 19, 22 y 26°C, respectivamente en el cv. Chocho. La fecundidad en el cv ICA-Pijao fue mucho más alta, 127. 2 huevos por hembra, a 19°C, que la del cv. Chocho. La tasa intrínseca de crecimiento poblacional (rm) fue más alta a 22°C (0.061), intermedia a 19°C (0.044) y más baja a 26°C (0.035) en el cv.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Plant Bug Tribe Mirini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Mirinae) Recorded on the Korean Peninsula, with Descriptions of Three New Species
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGYENTOMOLOGY ISSN (online): 1802-8829 Eur. J. Entomol. 115: 467–492, 2018 http://www.eje.cz doi: 10.14411/eje.2018.048 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Annotated checklist of the plant bug tribe Mirini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Mirinae) recorded on the Korean Peninsula, with descriptions of three new species MINSUK OH 1, 2, TOMOHIDE YASUNAGA3, RAM KESHARI DUWAL4 and SEUNGHWAN LEE 1, 2, * 1 Laboratory of Insect Biosystematics, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Korea; e-mail: [email protected] 3 Research Associate, Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA; e-mail: [email protected] 4 Visiting Scientists, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A, 0C6, Canada; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Heteroptera, Miridae, Mirinae, Mirini, checklist, key, new species, new record, Korean Peninsula Abstract. An annotated checklist of the tribe Mirini (Miridae: Mirinae) recorded on the Korean peninsula is presented. A total of 113 species, including newly described and newly recorded species are recognized. Three new species, Apolygus hwasoonanus Oh, Yasunaga & Lee, sp. n., A. seonheulensis Oh, Yasunaga & Lee, sp. n. and Stenotus penniseticola Oh, Yasunaga & Lee, sp. n., are described. Eight species, Apolygus adustus (Jakovlev, 1876), Charagochilus (Charagochilus) longicornis Reuter, 1885, C. (C.) pallidicollis Zheng, 1990, Pinalitopsis rhodopotnia Yasunaga, Schwartz & Chérot, 2002, Philostephanus tibialis (Lu & Zheng, 1998), Rhabdomiris striatellus (Fabricius, 1794), Yamatolygus insulanus Yasunaga, 1992 and Y. pilosus Yasunaga, 1992 are re- ported for the fi rst time from the Korean peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Greenhouse Insects and Mites Identification and Management the List of Common Greenhouse Insects and Mites in Colorado Is a Fairly Short One
    Common Greenhouse Insects and Mites Identification and Management The list of common greenhouse insects and mites in Colorado is a fairly short one: • Aphids (several species) • Whiteflies (one species) • Thrips (two common species) • Twpspotted spider mite • Fungus gnats • Tomato/potato psyllid Aphids Hemiptera: Aphididae Primary aphid species found in greenhouses Green peach aphid Cotton-melon aphid Potato aphid Body plan of a typical, wingless aphid All aphids go through three feeding stages, each punctuated with a molting event “Cast skins”, the discarded remnants of the exoskeleton after molting Diagnostic: “Cast Skins” remain after aphids molt Live birth and asexual reproduction are the norm with aphids Aphid populations can increase rapidly Adults may be winged or wingless Wing pads of late stage aphid nymph Adults may be winged or wingless Piercing-sucking mouthparts of Hemiptera (aphids, whiteflies, mealybugs, leafhoppers, etc.) Probocis (primarily the labium) of an aphid Stylet bundle (mandibles and maxillae) meandering through plant en route to phloem Aphids use their mouthparts to access the fluids of the phloem Little, if any, cell injury is produced by most aphids Important Note: Presence of aphids does not always equate to occurrence of plant injury! Honeydew production Uptake of phloem fluids here Emergence of “honeydew” here Leaf with sparkles of honeydew – and cast skins The leaf above the honeydew – an aphid colony Leaf with sparkles of honeydew – and cast skins Some non-aphid honeydew producing insects Whiteflies Mealybugs
    [Show full text]
  • The Debate on Plant and Crop Biodiversity and Biotechnology
    The Debate on Plant and Crop Biodiversity and Biotechnology Klaus Ammann, [email protected] Version from December 15, 2017, 480 full text references, 117 pp. ASK-FORCE contribution No. 11 Nearly 470 references on biodiversity and Agriculture need still to be screened and selected. Contents: 1. Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................... 3 2. The needs for biodiversity – the general case ................................................................................................................ 3 3. Relationship between biodiversity and ecological parameters ..................................................................................... 5 4. A new concept of sustainability ....................................................................................................................................... 6 4.1. Revisiting the original Brundtland definition of sustainable development ...............................................................................................................7 4.2. Redefining Sustainability for Agriculture and Technology, see fig. 1 .........................................................................................................................8 5. The Issue: unnecessary stigmatization of GMOs .......................................................................................................... 12 6. Types of Biodiversity ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]