Eyes of Faith, 1. Augustine of Hippo A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eyes of Faith, 1. Augustine of Hippo A EYES OF FAITH, 1. AUGUSTINE OF HIPPO A. Life Born in Tagaste (Algeria) in 354; Bishop of Hippo Regius in Roman Africa for 35 years; lived during the decline of Western Roman civilization on that continent; died in 430, aged 76, with the Vandals at the gates of Hippo (Rome had fallen in 410). Stands at a watershed in the history of western thought, between the classical world of the Roman empire and the Middle Ages. Bridges the gap between ancient pagan Rome and the Christian middle ages. Enormous influence on Western theology, helped form Christian theology as a whole. Considered the greatest of the Fathers of the Western Church. “You are famous throughout the whole world; Catholics venerate and look upon you as a second founder of the old faith*, and — a token of yet more illustrious glory — all the heretics detest you. They persecute me too with equal hatred….” (Jerome, Ep. 195). “The great luminary of the Western world is, as we know, St. Augustine; he, no infallible teacher, has formed the intellect of Europe” (Newman: Apologia, Fontana, 1959, p. 296.) “an extraordinary sense of the glory and of the misery of man” (H. Chadwick, 1) B. Career Mother, Monica, a Christian; father, Patricius, Roman, baptised on deathbed. Ordinary schoolboy, keen on Latin, sponsored to university in Carthage at seventeen, took a concubine, spent dissipated youth, had son. Specialised in philosophy, found Bible primitive, and became Manichee, attracted by dualism between good and evil and explanation/justification of his immorality. Became disillusioned intellectually, developed highly successful academic career, appointed to chair of rhetoric for the imperial court at Milan in 384, aged thirty. Became Neo-Platonist. Intellectually impressed by Ambrose, bishop of Milan. Garden experience and baptism. Returned to Africa with friends to form a lay celibate Christian commune in Tagaste. Son died aged 17. Persuaded to become priest, later bishop of Hippo, a busy seaport, for 34 years, heading a monastic community. A formidable polemicist. C. Writings Two outstanding masterpieces: Confessions [Conf], describing his emotional, intellectual and moral conversion (later interpretation?); The City of God [CG]. In A.D. 410, Goths sacked Rome, and some Roman émigrés wondered if abandonment of heathenism was to blame. Augustine took fifteen years in writing City of God, providing a Christian understanding of history and a moral explanation of the failure of the Roman Empire. Very busy pastorally with regular popular sermons, detailed meditative scripture commentaries (e.g. John) and frequent letters. Highly influential theological treatments (Trinity, Christology, Church, sacraments, grace, sin, concupiscence) Engaged in ongoing controversies (Manicheans, Arians, Donatism, Pelagianism), hammering out his own theology. D. Some seminal ideas. Evil is not a power or agency, but the absence of good (against Manicheism). Stress on human postlapsarian depravity requiring continuous divine intervention and sovereignty of grace. Developed created grace(s) as divine aids; known as “Doctor of grace”. “just war” conditions, Against Faustus 22,74-75; City of God 19,7. Effects of sacraments unaffected by faith or worthiness of minister (ex opere operato: from the deed done). Psychological model of the Blessed Trinity. Threefold “goods” of marriage, offspring, fidelity, sacrament (indivisibility), needed to justify intercourse, which is morally suspect. Use of state power to enforce orthodox beliefs. Limbo (“edge” of hell) for children dying unbaptized in original sin (“minimal suffering”). Divine predestination of all human beings. E. On the Trinity. As trinitarian theology was developing, especially in Council of Constantinople (381) and later, analogies were sought to help understand (not prove) the mystery of how three “persons” could be united in one divine “nature” (Tertullian, 2-3c.). Can start from Three (East), or from One (Augustine), proposing the famous psychological analogy: If we are created in the image of one God, are there traces in humanity which can provide us with a clue to what the triune God, our origin, is like? Augustine’s final suggestion was that everyone has one spiritual soul or consciousness, but this has three distinct activities: our memory, our understanding and our will. So, is God in his inner life something/anything like that?. F. Controversies: On Donatism. Who are members of the Church if it is to be “without spot or wrinkle” (Eph 5.27)? After Catholicism accepted by state, Donatus (d. 355), bishop of Carthage, led a large rigorist and aggressive schismatic church in Africa. Opposed re- admitting lapsed members, and denied the validity of their sacraments. Augustine first tried to reconcile them: pleading that the church be one and universal, open to all, including penitent sinners; and insisting that Christ is divine minister of the sacraments (ex opere operato), Then he requested, and supported, government “compelling” policy against Donatists, citing Lk 14.23 – a dangerous precedent. “Dilige et quod vis fac” (love and do what you want) (Ep. Jo 7,8). Not a “situation ethics” slogan (as Fletcher): genuine love leads to the right action. On Pelagianism. Pelagius (c.360 – c.420), theologian and greatly admired ascetic lay preacher from Roman Britain. “Ponderous and stuffed with Scots’ porridge” (Jerome). Had travelled in monasteries in the East, so was highly positive theologically on human nature and its moral resources. An exemplary, vocal and influential reformer in lax Roman court and high society circles, full of “converts” after Emperor Theodosius had outlawed paganism and imposed (non-Arian) Christianity. Pelagius appalled to hear in Rome Augustine’s refrain which Pelagius considered moral mollycoddling: “grant what you command, and command whatever you want” (da quod iubes, et iube quod vis). Pelagius furiously insisted on free will and successful human effort in observing all the Commandments, without taking refuge in excuses, or undermining moral effort, especially in a Church full of mediocre “converts”. Pelagius maintained that Adam’s sin injured only himself, not the human race or infants, and that all humans are capable of acting well naturally and without needing grace. The human will needs no divine remedy or supercharger. Gathered many supporters. Augustine wrote often and at length to refute the Pelagians (hence his later title, “Doctor of Grace”), sharpening his own theological views (he argued that infant baptism proved belief in original sin). Secured rejection of Pelagianism in various local African councils, especially Carthage. Finally, the general Council of Ephesus (431) condemned Pelagian views (Augustine died in 430), as did Council of Orange II (529) and subsequently Council of Trent (16th c.) on rediscovering the Augustine-dominated Council of Orange. “Pelagian” later used as term of abuse by Reformers against Catholics. “Semipelagianism” is View that the very beginning of act of faith, leading to grace of justification, is purely natural, not requiring “preceding” grace. Term first used by Protestant Reformers against Scholastic theologians in controversy over justification, used by Jansenists in 17th century against opponents as redolent of Pelagianism .G. Original sin and grace. Greatly concerned at his moral powerlessness through the “disease of concupiscence” (Conf 8.7), Augustine was deeply influenced by Paul’s letter to the Romans, especially the reflections on the sin of Adam and its disastrous consequences for all humanity. For Augustine, longing for self-control over his unruly sinful feelings, the whole human race is revealed by Paul to be a condemned throng (massa damnata) poisoned from the start along with sinful Adam and Eve. “The law of sin which dwells in my members” (Rom 7.23) only too readily explained for Augustine his unruly sexual desires.Consequently humans can do absolutely nothing good without God’s grace: healing us, inspiring us, helping us, elevating us, a whole armoury of created graces in the soul. Adamology. One of the major themes of Paul’s theology concerned Christ as the Second Adam, restoring creation and life: to describe Christ’s salvation of all humanity he had to connect all the original humanity with Adam. Paul’s key comparison was, “Therefore , just as sin came into the world through one man and death came through sin, and so death spread to all because all have sinned … much more surely have the grace of God and the free gift in the grace of the one man, Jesus Christ, abounded for the many” (Rom 5.12,15) The phrase “because all have sinned” translates Paul’s Greek phrase ’ω (eph ho), which literally means “since when”, or “as a result of which” all have sinned. But the Old Latin Translation of the New Testament, which Augustine and his contemporaries used (he had little Greek), translated Paul’s words eph ho as “in quo”, or “in whom all have sinned,” leading Augustine to understand that everyone born after Adam had sinned “in Adam”: “The Apostle says ‘In whom all have sinned’. ‘In whom’ can only be understood as in Adam, in whom he says they also die”. From this Augustine developed his theology of the corporate solidarity of all subsequent men and women “in” Adam, their first parent, thus involving all human beings, indeed, involving human nature as a whole, as penalised in Adam’s own fall from grace. Hence the conclusion which Western Christianity has held for centuries, that since Adam the whole human race is revealed by Paul to be “poisoned” from the start along with sinful Adam and Eve, all subsequent human beings starting life as a miserable lot of sinners, what Augustine called a massa damnata, a “condemned lump”, for whom only an atoning sacrifice on the part of Jesus – and the sacrament of baptism – would secure God”s forgiveness. “Hinc est universa generis humani massa damnata”, CG 21.12. Thus, the Old Latin version of the New Testament gave “an exegesis of Rom 5,12 which, though mistaken and based on a false reading, was to become the pivot of the doctrine of original sin”.J.
Recommended publications
  • Sin. Systematic Theology.Wayne Grudem
    Systematic Theology Wayne Grudem Chapter 24! SIN What is sin? Where did it come from? Do we inherit a sinful nature from Adam? Do we inherit guilt from Adam? EXPLANATION AND SCRIPTURAL BASIS A. The Definition of Sin The history of the human race as presented in Scripture is primarily a history of man in a state of sin and rebellion against God and of God’s plan of redemption to bring man back to himself. Therefore, it is appropriate now to consider the nature of the sin that separates man from God. We may define sin as follows: Sin is any failure to conform to the moral law of God in act, attitude, or nature. Sin is here defined in relation to God and his moral law. Sin includes not only individual acts such as stealing or lying or committing murder, but also attitudes that are contrary to the attitudes God requires of us. We see this already in the Ten Commandments, which not only prohibit sinful actions but also wrong attitudes: “You shall not covet your neighbor’s house. You shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, or his manservant or maidservant, his ox or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor” (Ex. 20:17 NIV). Here God specifies that a desire to steal or to commit adultery is also sin in his sight. The Sermon on the Mount also prohibits sinful attitudes such as anger (Matt. 5:22) or lust (Matt. 5:28). Paul lists attitudes such as jealousy, anger, and selfishness (Gal. 5:20) as things that are works of the flesh opposed to the desires of the Spirit (Gal.
    [Show full text]
  • PHIL 269: Philosophy of Sex and Love: Course Outline
    PHIL 269: Philosophy of Sex and Love: Course Outline 1. Title of Course: Philosophy of Sex and Love 2. Catalogue Description: The course investigates philosophical questions regarding the nature of sex and love, including questions such as: what is sex? What is sexuality? What is love? What kinds of love are possible? What is the proper morality of sexual behavior? Does gender, race, or class influence how we approach these questions? The course will consider these questions from an historical perspective, including philosophical, theological and psychological approaches, and then follow the history of ideas from ancient times into contemporary debates. A focus on the diversity theories and perspectives will be emphasized. Topics to be covered may include marriage, reproduction, casual sex, prostitution, pornography, and homosexuality. 3. Prerequisites: PHIL 110 4. Course Objectives: The primary course objectives are: To enable students to use philosophical methods to understand sex and love To enable students to follow the history of ideas regarding sex and love To enable students to understand contemporary debates surrounding sex and love in their diversity To enable students to see the connections between the history of ideas and their contemporary meanings To enable students to use (abstract, philosophical) theories to analyze contemporary debates 5. Student Learning Outcomes The student will be able to: Define the direct and indirect influence of historical thinkers on contemporary issues Define and critically discuss major philosophical issues regarding sex and love and their connections to metaphysics, ethics and epistemology Analyze, explain, and criticize key passages from historical texts regarding the philosophy of sex and love.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Christian Doctrine of Original Sin
    THE GREAT CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE OF ORIGINAL SIN by Jonathan Edwards “They that be whole, need not a physician; but they that are sick.” - Matthew 9:12 1 CONTENTS Advertisement 3 The Author’s Preface 7 PART ONE Wherein Are Considered Some Evidences of Original Sin From Facts and Events, as Founded by Observation and Experience, Together With Representations and Testimonies of Holy Scripture, and the Confession and Assertion of Opposers. Chapter One 8 Chapter Two 69 PART TWO Containing Observations on Particular Parts of the Holy Scripture Which Prove the Doctrine of Original Sin. Chapter One 78 Chapter Two 102 Chapter Three 110 Chapter Four 130 PART THREE The Evidence Given Us, Relative to the Doctrine of Original Sin, in What the Scriptures Reveal Concerning the Redemption by Christ. Chapter One 143 Chapter Two 148 PART FOUR Containing Answers to Objections. Chapter One 155 Chapter Two 158 Chapter Three 164 Chapter Four 177 2 ADVERTISEMENT CONTAINING A BRIEF ACCOUNT OF THIS BOOK AND ITS AUTHOR, BY THE FIRST EDITOR The Reverend Author of the following piece, was removed by death before its publication. But, ere his decease, the copy was finished and brought to the press; and a number of sheets passed his own review. They who were acquainted with the author, or know his just character, and have any taste for the serious theme, will want nothing to be said in recommendation of the ensuing tract, but only that Mr. Edwards wrote it. Several valuable pieces on this subject have lately been published, upon the same side of the question.
    [Show full text]
  • 95 Baptism and Incorporation Into the Body of Christ, the Church: A
    Baptism and Incorporation into the Body of Christ, the Church: A Lutheran Reflection TIMOTHY J. WENGERT* In 2010, at the Lutheran World Federation’s (LWF) Assembly in Stuttgart, Germany, the churches of the LWF asked the Mennonite World Conference (MWC) for forgiveness over the way in which their Lutheran ancestors had treated the Mennonites’ Anabaptist forebears. This “one, small step” bore fruit almost immediately with the establishment of a trilateral dialogue with Mennonites and Roman Catholics, who had earlier concluded similar talks between the MWC and the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity (PCPCU) over responsibility for persecution. Though not quite the same as landing on the moon, the results of those trilateral meetings mark an important step forward in Christian rapprochement and indicate where important theological work still needs to be done. As a member of the original LWF/MWC conversations and the follow-up committee for the LWF, I am pleased to offer some reflections on this new report. PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS In a rather unassuming sentence in the preface of the report, we read: “It should be noted that a trilateral dialogue is rare.” Readers should highlight this sentence precisely because it represents a pioneering way forward in ecumenical conversations. Multilateral conversations often are stymied over the sheer breadth of theological and practical differences; bilateral dialogues may help individual churches but are not guaranteed to have broader significance. To be sure, there are exceptions, such as the multilateral production of Baptism, Eucharist, and Ministry from the international Commission on Faith and Order or the much wider impact of the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification initially made between Lutherans and Roman Catholics.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas on the Mind, Body, and Life After Death
    The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron Williams Honors College, Honors Research The Dr. Gary B. and Pamela S. Williams Honors Projects College Spring 2020 St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas on the Mind, Body, and Life After Death Christopher Choma [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/honors_research_projects Part of the Christianity Commons, Epistemology Commons, European History Commons, History of Philosophy Commons, History of Religion Commons, Metaphysics Commons, Philosophy of Mind Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Recommended Citation Choma, Christopher, "St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas on the Mind, Body, and Life After Death" (2020). Williams Honors College, Honors Research Projects. 1048. https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/honors_research_projects/1048 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by The Dr. Gary B. and Pamela S. Williams Honors College at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The University of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Williams Honors College, Honors Research Projects by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 1 St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas on the Mind, Body, and Life After Death By: Christopher Choma Sponsored by: Dr. Joseph Li Vecchi Readers: Dr. Howard Ducharme Dr. Nathan Blackerby 2 Table of Contents Introduction p. 4 Section One: Three General Views of Human Nature p.
    [Show full text]
  • Life with Augustine
    Life with Augustine ...a course in his spirit and guidance for daily living By Edmond A. Maher ii Life with Augustine © 2002 Augustinian Press Australia Sydney, Australia. Acknowledgements: The author wishes to acknowledge and thank the following people: ► the Augustinian Province of Our Mother of Good Counsel, Australia, for support- ing this project, with special mention of Pat Fahey osa, Kevin Burman osa, Pat Codd osa and Peter Jones osa ► Laurence Mooney osa for assistance in editing ► Michael Morahan osa for formatting this 2nd Edition ► John Coles, Peter Gagan, Dr. Frank McGrath fms (Brisbane CEO), Benet Fonck ofm, Peter Keogh sfo for sharing their vast experience in adult education ► John Rotelle osa, for granting us permission to use his English translation of Tarcisius van Bavel’s work Augustine (full bibliography within) and for his scholarly advice Megan Atkins for her formatting suggestions in the 1st Edition, that have carried over into this the 2nd ► those generous people who have completed the 1st Edition and suggested valuable improvements, especially Kath Neehouse and friends at Villanova College, Brisbane Foreword 1 Dear Participant Saint Augustine of Hippo is a figure in our history who has appealed to the curiosity and imagination of many generations. He is well known for being both sinner and saint, for being a bishop yet also a fellow pilgrim on the journey to God. One of the most popular and attractive persons across many centuries, his influence on the church has continued to our current day. He is also renowned for his influ- ence in philosophy and psychology and even (in an indirect way) art, music and architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Augustine and Prayer by John M
    SGU PAMPHLETS Augustine and Prayer by John M. Brentnall Augustine and Prayer by John M. Brentnall Introduction Augustine of Hippo (354-430), the great ‘Church Father’ from whose writings Luther and Calvin contributed so much to the Reformation, “never wrote what could be called a treatise on prayer.” (Thomas Hand) His nearest approach to an extended treatment of the subject - a letter to a wealthy noble widow who had sought his advice - merely delineates the kind of people we must be in order to pray acceptably, and develops a few valuable suggestions on prayer that are useful for the Christian’s journey towards the full enjoyment of God. His Expositions on the Psalms, though not specifically a study of prayer, throw much light on how Christ and His Church express their union and communion through prayer, and how believers may make the psalmists’ prayers their own. The Confessions weave in and out of prayer so much that they may be justly regarded as one prolonged prayer; yet they offer no direct teaching on the subject. For their part, the Sermons, Soliloquies, Treatises, Letters and Retractations cast up many valuable thoughts on prayer, not to mention some priceless gems in the form of particular prayers offered to God by Augustine himself; but they too offer no systematic treatment. In view of this absence, perhaps the most we can distill from the vast and varied array of available material is “not a system or method” of prayer, but “a general orientation with recurrent themes and characteristic emphases.” (Rebecca Weaver) What we can distill, however, may well revolutionize our whole view and practice of prayer.
    [Show full text]
  • Preface Thomism and the Challenge of Integral Ecology
    Preface Thomism and the Challenge of Integral Ecology The late Fr. Richard John Neuhaus said that a “Thomist of the Strict Observance,” was one who believed that the thought of the Angelic Doctor is the intellectual hardware that can run any software. He was thinking, he said, of the Jesuit scholar Norris Clarke, whose phil- osophical work aimed at showing how Thomas Aquinas could make sense even of the process philosophers Alfred North Whitehead and Charles Hartshorne. At Fordham University my then-girlfriend Cathy (now my wife) would take me to lunch with Father Clarke, then in his late eighties, a spry gnome-like character who would re- gale us with his intellectual adventures of bringing St. Thomas to every conceivable endeavor. Upon his mentioning a lunch date with the Dalai Lama, I asked him what he had said. Father Clarke looked at us and said very seriously, “I told him, ‘You have wonderful medi- tative practices, but your metaphysics are terrible!’” The Thomist of the Strict Observance then attempted, well, to enlighten him. I’m not sure I agreed with everything Father Clarke said about metaphysics or Thomas Aquinas, but that impulse to bring Thomism to bear on intellectual projects and problems out there in the world was remarkable to me. The tribe of old-fashioned Thomists is often logos 21:4 fall 2018 6 logos fiercely protective of their master in such a way as to ward off any- body attempting to bring him out of the thirteenth, the greatest of centuries, and into our own milieu. I do not doubt the intellectual seriousness, the learning, or the rigor of their work.
    [Show full text]
  • Summa Theologiae with Reference to Contemporary Psychological Studies
    Concept of Happiness in Summa Theologiae with Reference to Contemporary Psychological Studies Von der Fakultät für Geisteswissenschaften der Universität Duisburg-Essen zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Philosophie (Dr. phil.) genehmigte Dissertation von Jaison Ambadan Chacko Ambadan aus Areekamala, Kerala, Indien Erster Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Ralf Miggelbrink Zweiter Gutachter : Prof. Dr. Markus Tiwald Vorsitzender des Prüfungsausschusses: Prof. Dr. Neil Roughley Tag der Disputation: 02.07.2018 1 Concept of Happiness in Summa Theologiae with Reference to Contemporary Psychological Studies General Introduction 6 Chapter I The Ethical Perspective of Happiness in Aquinas´s Concept of Human Acts Introduction 27 1. Human Acts 31 1.1 Voluntary 52 1.2 Involuntary 53 1.3 Circumstances 54 1.3.1 Nature of Circumstance 55 1.3.2 Role Circumstances in Moral Evaluation 56 1.4 Cognitive Participation 57 1.4.1 Three Acts of the Speculative Intellect 58 1.4.2 Three Acts of the Practical Intellect 60 1.5 The Will 62 1.5.1 Cause of the Movement of the Will 62 1.5.2 Manner in which the Will Moves 63 1.5.3 Characteristics of the Act of the Will 64 1.5.3.1 Enjoyment 65 1.5.3.2 Intention 65 1.5.3.3 Choice 67 1.5.3.4 Counsel 68 1.5.3.5 Consent 68 1.5.3.6 Use 69 1.6 Human Acts Commanded by the Will 70 1.6.1 Good and Evil in Human Acts 71 1.6.2 Goodness and Malice in Human Acts 72 1.6.3 Impact of the Interior Act 75 1.6.4 Impact of the External Act 76 1.6.5 Impact of Disposition 77 Conclusion 79 2 Chapter II Thomas Aquinas´s Cognition of Passion and Happiness Introduction 82 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Critique of Plato's Conception of Morality with Reference to the Teachers' Expected Examination Integrity in Kenya
    A CRITIQUE OF PLATO’S CONCEPTION OF MORALITY WITH REFERENCE TO THE TEACHERS’ EXPECTED EXAMINATION INTEGRITY IN KENYA EDWARD MAINA ANDAFU A THESIS SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI 2019 DECLARATION This thesis is my original work and it has not been presented for any award of a Degree or Diploma in any other University. ……………………………… ……………………… Edward Maina Andafu Date REG. No. E84/52028/2017 This thesis has been submitted for examination with our approval as the University Supervisors. Signature………………….. Date ……………………. Dr Atieno Kili K’Odhiambo Senior Lecturer in Philosophy of Education Department of Educational Foundations University of Nairobi Signature…………………… Date ……………………. Professor Samson Okuro Gunga Professor of Philosophy of Education Department of Educational Foundations University of Nairobi II DEDICATION This work is dedicated to all the members of my immediate family: my wife Dorcus Ofuyo, my sons, Lewis Andafu and Wesley Andafu, for their everlasting love; also to my late father Julius Andafu, and my late mother Ketry Andafu, who always had confidence in me. III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I hereby acknowledge the following for their immense contribution to my work. My first thanks go to my very able supervisors, Dr Atieno Kili K’Odhiambo and Professor Samson Okuro Gunga who have mentored me through this work. I thank members of the Department of Educational Foundations, University of Nairobi whose positive criticism put me on the right track in pursuit of my studies. I am grateful to Dr Wycliffe Amukowa (Machakos University) for his moral and intellectual support towards the accomplishment of this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Augustine Catholic Church Oakland, California • Nineteenth Sunday in Ordinary Time• August 11Th, 2019 Parish News
    Saint Augustine Catholic Church Oakland, California • Nineteenth Sunday in Ordinary Time• August 11th, 2019 Parish News RCIA: We are beginning the Rite of Christian Ini- tiation of Adults soon. If you have friends or family members who would like to learn more about the Christian Faith kindly invite them to join RCIA. Roof replacement: The roofs of Elizbeth House and the Rectory have failed and need replacement. In the coming weeks we will be starting work to re- place them. Your valuable contributions to this works will be much appreciated. The total cost is about $58,000. Kindly pray that the work goes smoothly and we are able to complete them before the rainy season. Feast of Saint Augustine: We are celebrating the feast of our parish patron, Saint Augustine, on August 25th. According to the Liturgical calendar the feast falls on August 28th. In order to celebrate it with everyone we are celebrating it to Sunday, 25th. Confessions is not merely an autobiography. Augustine melds consciousness with experience: St Augustine was an influential Christian theolo- he is an observer, as well as a character, in his own gian from Numidia (modern-day Algeria) who was story. He reveals his private self, telling us how he born on November 13, 354. In his youth he was thinks, as he relates his experiences. drawn to Manichaeism and later to Neoplatonism. In 383, Augustine left Africa for Augustine wrote the Confessions in 400 AD, less Rome, in the hopes of improving his professional than a decade after his ordination to the priesthood, fortune.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. What Matters Is the Motive / Immanuel Kant
    This excerpt is from Michael J. Sandel, Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do?, pp. 103-116, by permission of the publisher. 5. WHAT MATTERS IS THE MOTIVE / IMMANUEL KANT If you believe in universal human rights, you are probably not a utili- tarian. If all human beings are worthy of respect, regardless of who they are or where they live, then it’s wrong to treat them as mere in- struments of the collective happiness. (Recall the story of the mal- nourished child languishing in the cellar for the sake of the “city of happiness.”) You might defend human rights on the grounds that respecting them will maximize utility in the long run. In that case, however, your reason for respecting rights is not to respect the person who holds them but to make things better for everyone. It is one thing to con- demn the scenario of the su! ering child because it reduces overall util- ity, and something else to condemn it as an intrinsic moral wrong, an injustice to the child. If rights don’t rest on utility, what is their moral basis? Libertarians o! er a possible answer: Persons should not be used merely as means to the welfare of others, because doing so violates the fundamental right of self-ownership. My life, labor, and person belong to me and me alone. They are not at the disposal of the society as a whole. As we have seen, however, the idea of self-ownership, consistently applied, has implications that only an ardent libertarian can love—an unfettered market without a safety net for those who fall behind; a 104 JUSTICE minimal state that rules out most mea sures to ease inequality and pro- mote the common good; and a celebration of consent so complete that it permits self-in" icted a! ronts to human dignity such as consensual cannibalism or selling oneself into slav ery.
    [Show full text]