North Atlantic Catholic Communities in Rome in the 19Th Century: Appointment and Ecclesiastical Policies of the First Irish-, American- and Canadian-Born Cardinals
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Rossella Bottoni (ricercatrice in Storia e Sistemi dei Rapporti Stato Chiesa nell’Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Facoltà di Scienze Politiche e Sociali) North Atlantic Catholic Communities in Rome in the 19th Century: Appointment and Ecclesiastical Policies of the First Irish-, American- and Canadian-Born Cardinals SUMMARY: 1. Introduction - 2. Cardinals and the Internationalization of the Sacred College - 3. The Internationalization of the Catholic Church, the Irish Diaspora and the Transnational Network of North Atlantic Catholic Communities - 4. Appointment and Ecclesiastical Policy of Paul Cullen, the First Irish-Born Cardinal - 5. Appointment and Ecclesiastical Policy of John McCloskey, the First American-Born Cardinal - 6. The First Vatican Council - 7. The 1878 Conclave - 8. Appointment and Ecclesiastical Policy of Elzéar-Alexandre Taschereau, the First Canadian-Born Cardinal - 9. Final Remarks. 1 - Introduction In the second half of the 19th century, when the Roman Curia was still a monopoly held by Italians and few other European nationalities, the first Irish-, American- and Canadian-born cardinals were appointed within the time span of twenty years. Pius IX raised to the purple Paul Cullen in 1866 and John McCloskey in 1875. In 1886, it was Elzéar-Alexandre Taschereau’s turn, created a cardinal by Leo XIII. In the subsequent decades, other Irish- , American- and Canadian-born cardinals were appointed. This development - in a crucial time characterized by the end of the pope’s temporal power - raises important questions: to what extent did the concerned cardinals became ‘Romanized’ and to what extent did they rather contribute to the development of a new vision of their role in the Catholic Church? To what extent did they pursue the interests of their respective national Catholic community, and to what extent did they rather share the same preoccupations and put forward the same demands? In order to answer these questions, I will focus on Cullen, McCloskey, Taschereau, by looking at their appointment and ecclesiastical policies. This essay will first offer some preliminary remarks on the institution This is the revised version, peer reviewed, of a paper presented at the Conference “North Atlantic Catholic Communities in Rome, 1622-1939”, organized by the Cushwa Center for the Study of American Catholicism, University of Notre Dame, Rome, on 6-7 June 2017. Rivista telematica (www.statoechiese.it), n. 12 del 2018 ISSN 1971- 8543 and role of cardinals and the internationalization of the Sacred College, which should be understood as the entrance of the rest of the world into Rome and as an instrument to promote the ideal of the universal Church1, especially after the end of the pope’s temporal power. This process will be further related to the Irish diaspora and placed in the context of the transnational network of North Atlantic Catholic communities2. The subsequent sections will address the set of questions mentioned above by focusing on Cullen, McCloskey and Taschereau. For the purposes of this paper I will not only focus on their ecclesiastical policies after the rise to the purple, because the ideas supported, the actions carried out, and the government style implemented before the cardinalate are a fundamental factor to explain how they related to Rome, and viceversa. 2 - Cardinals and the Internationalization of the Sacred College The institution of cardinals is currently regulated by Canons 349-359 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law3, but both the meaning of the title ‘cardinal’ (which derives from the Latin cardo)4 and the related functions, rights and duties have undergone transformations over the course of time. Since the 11th century the College of cardinals has provided for the election of the Roman pontiff, and cardinals - either collegially or individually - have assisted him in the government of the universal Church. Distinctive features of the Sacred College have been the prominent political role played by 1 See F. JANKOWIAK, La curie romaine de Pie IX à Pie X. Le gouvernement central de l'Église et la fin des états pontificaux (1846-1914), École française de Rome, Rome, 2007, p. 467. 2 On the opportunity of an approach treating the history of the Catholic Church in North America in the context of the North Atlantic world, see inter alia L. CODIGNOLA, Roman Catholic Conservatism in a New North Atlantic World, 1760-1829, in The William and Mary Quarterly, 2007, LXIV/4, pp. 719-720: “[t]he larger North Atlantic picture […] shows that these church developments in different regions were part of a common attitude, which allowed the Catholic Church not just to survive but indeed to prosper in countries that did not officially acknowledge church members and often legally discriminated against them”. For an assessment of this historiographical perspective, see M. BINASCO, Introduction. Constructing an Atlantic World, in Little Do We Know. History and Historians of the North Atlantic 1492-2010, ed. by L. Codignola, M. Binasco, ISEM-CNR, Cagliari, 2011, pp. 13-26. 3 The English text is available at http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/_P19.HTM. For the regulation of the 1917 Code of Canon Law (Canons 230-241), see J. F. BRODERICK, The Sacred College of Cardinals: Size and Geographical Composition (1099-1986), in Archivum Historiae Pontificiae, 1987, XXV, p. 63. 4 For an in-depth analysis, see M. ANDRIEU, L'origine du titre de cardinal dans l'Église romaine, Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, Città del Vaticano, 1964. 2 Rivista telematica (www.statoechiese.it), n. 12 del 2018 ISSN 1971- 8543 cardinals in the respective country of origin and the exercise of a representative function of the respective ‘national’ Church in the 16th-19th centuries, and the decrease in the number of European cardinals in the 20th century5. At this purpose, Broderick wrote in 1987 that “[n]owadays, whenever a pope announces a creation of Roman cardinals, worldwide attention focuses on the resultant size and geographical makeup of the Sacred College”6. Today, the international character of the College of cardinals is given for granted and regarded as truly embodying the Catholic, that is, international character of the Church. However, in the past, the cardinalate was a monopoly of just a few nationalities. In the Middle Age cardinals were selected from a very limited area, and from the modern age till the 19th century approximately 90% of newly-created cardinals were Italians, French and Spaniards7. A change towards a greater geographical composition occurred at the time of the pope’s loss of the temporal power following the extinction of the Papal States, which used to supply a high percentage of candidates. Pius IX and Leo XIII created respectively 123 and 147 cardinals. Although the majority of them were still Italians, French and Spaniards, the College of cardinals started becoming more international. In this essay I will deal with the first Irish-born, American-born and Canadian-born cardinals, but the process of internationalization of the Sacred College concerned other nationalities and countries, as well. For example, in 1875 Archbishop Juan Moreno y Maisonave of Valladolid, born in Guatemala, was created cardinal, and in 1885 the Irish-born Archbishop Patrick Francis Moran of Sydney, and Cullen’s nephew, was also raised to the purple8. This process was the result of a number of factors: the Catholic Church’s expansion in the mission lands, the search for international support in the Roman Question, the pastoral re-orienteering of the Church, and the change in the Holy See’s ecclesiastical policy, aimed at stressing its moral authority9. The first factor is especially relevant for the purposes of this essay. At the beginning of the examined period, Ireland (still part of 5 C. CARDIA, Il governo della Chiesa, il Mulino, Bologna, 2002, pp. 100-101. See also S.E. VAN LIERDE, A. GIRAUD, Le Sénat de l’Eglise. Le Sacré Collège, Fayard, Paris, 1963. 6 J.F. BRODERICK, The Sacred College of Cardinals, cit., p. 7. 7 J.F. BRODERICK, The Sacred College of Cardinals, cit., pp. 15 and 44. 8 J.F. BRODERICK, The Sacred College of Cardinals, cit., p. 62; R. REGOLI, L’élite cardinalizia dopo la fine dello Stato pontificio, in Archivum Historiae Pontificiae, 2009, XLVII, pp. 64-66. 9 R. REGOLI, L’élite cardinalizia, cit., p. 66. 3 Rivista telematica (www.statoechiese.it), n. 12 del 2018 ISSN 1971- 8543 Britain), the United States and Canada were territories dependent on the Congregation de Propaganda Fide, erected on 22 June 1622 by Gregory XV’s Bull Inscrutabili Divinae to promote the spread of Catholicism and regulate ecclesiastical affairs in non-Catholic countries10. While the Provinciae Apostolicae were subject directly to the Holy See, the Terrae Missionum depended on the Congregation de Propaganda Fide11. As noted by Codignola, the Congregation cardinals did not seem to act differently in the different regions of the world within their own jurisdiction, and started showing signs of change only in the mid-19th century12. For present purposes, it should be noted that the Catholic Church’s expansion in the mission lands was especially remarkable in the British Empire, where the Church’s growing importance was epitomized not only by the creation of the first Canadian-born cardinal, but also by the appointment of the first Australian cardinal, as mentioned above13. At the end of the 19th century, the Irish, American and Canadian Churches became more and more structured and organized, and bore less and less resemblance to mission Churches14. In 1908 Pius X withdrew a number of ecclesiastical provinces - including those of Ireland, Canada, and the United States - from the Congregation de Propaganda’s regime15: thus, he changed 10 U. BENIGNI, Propaganda, Sacred Congregation of, in The Catholic Encyclopedia, Robert Appleton Company, New York, 1911, XII, pp. 456-457. See also G.