A Reform Agenda for the U.S. Department of Transportation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
CONTENTS 1 FEATURES DEPARTMENTS Publisher Introducing the Vanpool Works Dale J
www.ctaa.org CONTENTS 1 FEATURES DEPARTMENTS Publisher Introducing the Vanpool Works Dale J. Marsico, CCTM 13 4 From the Editor Editor-in-Chief Scott Bogren Editor 16 Taking a Closer Look at Commuting 6 The CT Podcast Rich Sampson Contributors 9 From the Community 1 Amy Conrick 24 Taking a Targeted Approach with Sector-Based Strategies Anthony Frederick Pamela Friedman Carolyn Jeskey 11 From the Community 2 Ryan Kelly Kevin Oliff 33 CalVans: An Easy Ride to the Hard Work on a Farm 53 About Us Circulation Please direct all circulation questions to [email protected] Finance 35 Meeting Complex Job Access Solutions with Community Partnerships & Buy In Don Browner Editorial Offi ces 1341 G Street, NW - 10th Floor Washington, DC 20005 Smart Phones & Apps: Empowering the Commuter Email: [email protected] 40 Web: www.ctaa.org/ct Advertising Sales Bill Shoemaker, A.H.I. 118 Church Street, P.O. Box 519 The CT Interview: Bridj Marketing Manager Ryan Kelly Selbyville, DE 19975 46 Phone: 302.436.4375 Fax: 302.436.911 Email: [email protected] 49 Telecommuting: The Road Less Traveled — Or Not Traveled at All www.ctaa.org CONTENTS 2 www.ctaa.org CONTENTS 3 From the Editor-in-Chief Vanpooling and Job Access Transportation Click anywhere on the above image to view Editor-in-Chief Scott Bogren’s welcome to this edition of DigitalCT magazine. www.ctaa.org CONTENTS 4 The Leader in Mobility Management Solutions 98% DEMAND RESPONSE 75% GREATER ACCESSIBILITY CUSTOMER RETENTION FIXED ROUTE PRODUCTIVITY INCREASE FOR ONE CUSTOMER FLEX ROUTE INTELLIGENT VEHICLES SOFTWARE -
Can Uber and Lyft Save Public Transit?
Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Pomona Senior Theses Pomona Student Scholarship 2019 Can Uber and Lyft Save Public Transit? Emily Zheng Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/pomona_theses Part of the Econometrics Commons, Economic Policy Commons, Environmental Policy Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Public Affairs Commons, Public Economics Commons, Public Policy Commons, Science and Technology Policy Commons, Science and Technology Studies Commons, Transportation Commons, and the Urban Studies Commons Can Uber and Lyft save Public Transit? Emily Zheng Pomona College Claremont, California April 26, 2019 Presented to: Bowman Cutter Associate Professor of Economics, Pomona College Jennifer Ward-Batts Lecturer in Economics, Pomona College Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Bachelor of Arts degree with a major in Economics/Public Policy Analysis Acknowledgements Thank you to my readers, Bowman Cutter and Jennifer Ward-Batts, for their advising and guidance throughout the thesis writing process. I would also like to thank Warren Lee and Sebastian Hack for their valuable feedback and coding expertise. Finally, a big thank you to my family for their continuous, unwavering support over the years. Table of Contents SECTION I: INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1: LITERATURE REVIEW 4 NATIONAL RIDERSHIP TRENDS 4 SHARED MOBILITY, TECHNOLOGY, AND TRANSIT RIDERSHIP 9 CONCLUSION 10 SECTION II: HOW TNCS CURRENTLY AFFECT PUBLIC TRANSIT RIDERSHIP 12 CHAPTER 2: THEORY 13 CHAPTER -
Autonomous Vehicles, Mobility, and Employment Policy: the Roads Ahead
RESEARCH BRIEF * JULY 2020 Autonomous Vehicles, Mobility, and Employment Policy: The Roads Ahead JOHN J. LEONARD, DAVID A. MINDELL, AND ERIK L. STAYTON 1 Autonomous Vehicles, Mobility, and Employment Policy: The Roads Ahead* John J. Leonard†, David A. Mindell‡, and Erik L. Stayton¶ † [email protected], Samuel C. Collins Professor of Mechanical and Ocean Engineering, MIT Department of Mechanical Engineering and MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) ‡ [email protected], Frances and David Dibner Professor of the History of Engineering and Manufacturing, MIT Program in Science, Technology, and Society and MIT Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics ¶ [email protected], PhD Candidate, MIT Program in Science, Technology, and Society *Research brief prepared for the MIT Task Force on Work of the Future. Support for this work has been provided by the Ralph C. Wilson, Jr. Foundation and the MIT Task Force on Work of the Future. The authors wish to thank Timothy Aeppel, David Autor, Russell Glynn, David Goldston, Susan Helper, Chad Huang, Frank Levy, Gill Pratt, Elisabeth Reynolds, Kevin Shen, and Anuraag Singh for their helpful comments on earlier drafts. All views expressed herein are solely those of the authors. Additional funding to support research for this paper was provided by the Ralph C. Wilson Foundation. Executive Summary Fully autonomous cars, trucks, and buses, able to operate across wide geographical areas with no drivers necessary, would revolutionize ground transportation. The number of accidents and fatalities could drop significantly. Time that people waste stuck in traffic could be recovered for work or leisure. Urban landscapes would change, requiring less parking and improving safety and efficiency for all. -
DART Fiscal Year 2020 Quadrennial Performance Review Covering FY2016 – FY2019
DART Fiscal Year 2020 Quadrennial Performance Review Covering FY2016 – FY2019 DART Fiscal Year 2020 Quadrennial Performance Review Covering FY2016 – FY2019 Author(s): Sasha Page, Arjun Pant, Christine Shepherd, Kimmo Oostermeyer, Jeroen Kok (IMG Rebel Advisory, Inc.), Diane Gollhofer Raines (DGR Consultants LLC), Ray Friem (CodeRed Business Solutions, Inc.), and Thomas A. Rubin Date: April 15th, 2021 Final 1015 15th St. NW Suite 600 Washington, DC 20005 www.rebelgroup.com DART Fiscal Year 2020 Quadrennial Performance Review | Status: Final 3/177 Table of contents Glossary of Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................... 9 1. Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 Requirements of the Audit ......................................................................................................................................... 12 1.2 Performance Review Summary ................................................................................................................................. 12 1.2.1 Key Performance Measures ............................................................................................................................. 13 1.2.2 Compliance............................................................................................................................................................. 15 1.2.3 Operations .............................................................................................................................................................