CONTENTS 1 FEATURES DEPARTMENTS Publisher Introducing the Vanpool Works Dale J
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Reform Agenda for the U.S. Department of Transportation
GETTY MOORE IMAGES/JOHN A Reform Agenda for the U.S. Department of Transportation By Kevin DeGood September 2020 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Contents 1 Introduction and summary 4 Ensuring safety across modes of transportation 9 Reducing emissions and adapting to climate change 13 Alleviating congestion 16 Expanding economic opportunity 20 Improving the condition of existing infrastructure assets 22 Guiding infrastructure prioritization, financing, and implementation 28 Conclusion 28 About the author 29 Endnotes Introduction and summary The goal of the U.S. transportation system is to safely, sustainably, and cost-effectively facilitate the movement of people and goods. When done right, infrastructure invest- ments produce broad-based prosperity for American workers and firms. Conversely, poor project selection can increase local pollution burdens, create barriers to oppor- tunity, and produce unproductive assets that serve as a drag on economic growth. In short, simply increasing federal spending is not sufficient. New federal dollars must be paired with policy reforms to ensure that funding from Washington yields the greatest social, environmental, and economic return on investment. Unfortunately, federal infrastructure policy and programs have not modernized to meet the five major challenges facing the U.S. transportation system: major injuries and fatalities, climate change, congestion, unequal economic opportunity, and crum- bling facilities. Running through each of these five areas is the need to ensure that federal transportation policy promotes inclusive prosperity and social equity. This means accounting for the discriminatory legacy of past investments that resulted in geographic dislocation, reduced economic opportunity, and poor community health. To remediate these harms, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) should tar- get funding to those communities facing the greatest need. -
Can Uber and Lyft Save Public Transit?
Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Pomona Senior Theses Pomona Student Scholarship 2019 Can Uber and Lyft Save Public Transit? Emily Zheng Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/pomona_theses Part of the Econometrics Commons, Economic Policy Commons, Environmental Policy Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Public Affairs Commons, Public Economics Commons, Public Policy Commons, Science and Technology Policy Commons, Science and Technology Studies Commons, Transportation Commons, and the Urban Studies Commons Can Uber and Lyft save Public Transit? Emily Zheng Pomona College Claremont, California April 26, 2019 Presented to: Bowman Cutter Associate Professor of Economics, Pomona College Jennifer Ward-Batts Lecturer in Economics, Pomona College Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Bachelor of Arts degree with a major in Economics/Public Policy Analysis Acknowledgements Thank you to my readers, Bowman Cutter and Jennifer Ward-Batts, for their advising and guidance throughout the thesis writing process. I would also like to thank Warren Lee and Sebastian Hack for their valuable feedback and coding expertise. Finally, a big thank you to my family for their continuous, unwavering support over the years. Table of Contents SECTION I: INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1: LITERATURE REVIEW 4 NATIONAL RIDERSHIP TRENDS 4 SHARED MOBILITY, TECHNOLOGY, AND TRANSIT RIDERSHIP 9 CONCLUSION 10 SECTION II: HOW TNCS CURRENTLY AFFECT PUBLIC TRANSIT RIDERSHIP 12 CHAPTER 2: THEORY 13 CHAPTER -
Autonomous Vehicles, Mobility, and Employment Policy: the Roads Ahead
RESEARCH BRIEF * JULY 2020 Autonomous Vehicles, Mobility, and Employment Policy: The Roads Ahead JOHN J. LEONARD, DAVID A. MINDELL, AND ERIK L. STAYTON 1 Autonomous Vehicles, Mobility, and Employment Policy: The Roads Ahead* John J. Leonard†, David A. Mindell‡, and Erik L. Stayton¶ † [email protected], Samuel C. Collins Professor of Mechanical and Ocean Engineering, MIT Department of Mechanical Engineering and MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) ‡ [email protected], Frances and David Dibner Professor of the History of Engineering and Manufacturing, MIT Program in Science, Technology, and Society and MIT Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics ¶ [email protected], PhD Candidate, MIT Program in Science, Technology, and Society *Research brief prepared for the MIT Task Force on Work of the Future. Support for this work has been provided by the Ralph C. Wilson, Jr. Foundation and the MIT Task Force on Work of the Future. The authors wish to thank Timothy Aeppel, David Autor, Russell Glynn, David Goldston, Susan Helper, Chad Huang, Frank Levy, Gill Pratt, Elisabeth Reynolds, Kevin Shen, and Anuraag Singh for their helpful comments on earlier drafts. All views expressed herein are solely those of the authors. Additional funding to support research for this paper was provided by the Ralph C. Wilson Foundation. Executive Summary Fully autonomous cars, trucks, and buses, able to operate across wide geographical areas with no drivers necessary, would revolutionize ground transportation. The number of accidents and fatalities could drop significantly. Time that people waste stuck in traffic could be recovered for work or leisure. Urban landscapes would change, requiring less parking and improving safety and efficiency for all. -
DART Fiscal Year 2020 Quadrennial Performance Review Covering FY2016 – FY2019
DART Fiscal Year 2020 Quadrennial Performance Review Covering FY2016 – FY2019 DART Fiscal Year 2020 Quadrennial Performance Review Covering FY2016 – FY2019 Author(s): Sasha Page, Arjun Pant, Christine Shepherd, Kimmo Oostermeyer, Jeroen Kok (IMG Rebel Advisory, Inc.), Diane Gollhofer Raines (DGR Consultants LLC), Ray Friem (CodeRed Business Solutions, Inc.), and Thomas A. Rubin Date: April 15th, 2021 Final 1015 15th St. NW Suite 600 Washington, DC 20005 www.rebelgroup.com DART Fiscal Year 2020 Quadrennial Performance Review | Status: Final 3/177 Table of contents Glossary of Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................... 9 1. Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 Requirements of the Audit ......................................................................................................................................... 12 1.2 Performance Review Summary ................................................................................................................................. 12 1.2.1 Key Performance Measures ............................................................................................................................. 13 1.2.2 Compliance............................................................................................................................................................. 15 1.2.3 Operations .............................................................................................................................................................