Wynyard Crossing Permanent Bridge Consultation and Engagement Report

xxx

Wynyard Crossing Permanent Bridge Consultation and Engagement Report

Date: 11 June 2019 Status: Final Author: Theresa Walsh, Engagement Advisor

xx

Contents

1 Background ...... 4

2 Consultation and engagement approach ...... 4

3 Mana Whenua Engagement ...... 4

4 Council Group ...... 4 4.1 ...... 4 4.2 Waitematā Local Board ...... 5 4.3 Centre Advisory Board (ACCAB) ...... 5 4.4 Auckland Transport ...... 5

5 Stakeholders ...... 5

6 Multi-stakeholder events ...... 5 6.1 Developers Collaboration Meeting ...... 5 6.2 Breakfast Briefings (Two) ...... 5 6.3 Drop in events (Three) ...... 6

7 Key issues ...... 6 7.1 Key issues ...... 6

8 Project Communications ...... 6

9 Conclusion ...... 7

Appendices Appendix 1: Stakeholder Consultation Log

iii

1 Background

The current Wynyard Crossing bridge was constructed to be a temporary crossing as part of the Rugby World cup infrastructure in 2010. The temporary crossing has a resource consent that lapses on 2 August 2020 and a building consent that lapses on 2 October 2020. The bridge was constructed to have an operational life of six years and is described as being at the end of its operational life, with potential issues arising around its reliability for all users.

Failure of the temporary crossing during the AC36 event is considered to be a significant reputational risk for the Auckland Council Group.

The proposal is to replace the existing temporary bridge with a new permanent bridge (pedestrian and cycling) and associated ancillary structures. The proposed bridge is a 6m wide (clear width) flat-deck double leaf bascule bridge with a diagonal split. The proposed bridge spans 47.5m in length and has approach ramps of approximately 40m on Karanga Plaza and 50m Te Wero Island side. This is due to level difference between the two sides and that the bridge needs to allow for a 3m high x10m wide navigable space when in its closed position.

The option was adopted by Panuku’s Board on 29 March 2019 and the project (artist impressions) was publicly unveiled on 2 April 2019. As part of the project process Panuku has engaged with mana whenua, the wider Council group, stakeholders and the general public. Details of these interactions are outlined below. 2 Consultation and engagement approach

Panuku’s approach to engagement on this project is one of generosity, in that ample opportunity be given for all potentially affected or interested parties have an opportunity to find out more about the project and provide feedback. An overall Comms and Engagement Plan was developed to guide this process.

As the project is intended to be delivered prior to the first AC36 races, the consenting approach is seeking that the application be publicly notified and potentially progressed through the Environment Court Direct Referral process. This process allows all parties and the wider community to participate in the RMA process. 3 Mana Whenua Engagement

Mana Whenua Engagement is contained within a separate report titled - Wynyard Crossing Permanent Bridge- Mana Whenua Engagement Summary.

4 Auckland Council Group

Elected Representatives and Local Boards

4.1 Auckland Council

Briefings have been provided to elected reps on this project and a report has been presented to the Planning Committee.

4

4.2 Waitematā Local Board

Waitematā Local Board has been briefed on the project on 12 February 2019, 1 April 2019 and 9 April 2019. At the workshop on 9 April 2019, the Board sought clarification on the design and mechanisms of the bridge. The Board has given positive feedback and generally support the project.

4.3 Auckland City Centre Advisory Board (ACCAB)

The project team presented at the ACCAB meeting on the 17 April 2019. The Committee were given a presentation and an opportunity to ask questions on the Project. There was overall support from ACCAB and good discussion regarding width and future proofing. Complimentary comments on design were received. The Committee passed the following Resolution:

That the Auckland City Centre Advisory Board: a) receive the overview of the proposed Wynyard Crossing bridge replacement project and timing. b) note support for the project.

4.4 Auckland Transport

A number of meetings have been held with Auckland Transport (AT) including attending their Capital Projects Accessibility Group (CPAG). 5 Stakeholders

Panuku and its former entity Waterfront Auckland has a long established and strong relationship with a number of key stakeholders in the Waterfront and Wynyard Quarter area. Using these existing relationships, a number of keys stakeholders who may be potentially affected by the proposal or who it was considered would hold a strong interest in the proposal have been engaged with. Appendix 1 of this report contains a consultation log of all these interactions with stakeholders. More than 18 one on one meetings were held. These gave stakeholders an opportunity to hear directly from the project team and for the team to receive feedback that could be addressed as part of the resource consent process. 6 Multi-stakeholder events

A number of multi stakeholder events were held to allow opportunity for as many interested, and potentially affected stakeholders to receive project information and provide feedback. The following events were held:

6.1 Developers Collaboration Meeting

Panuku has a regular Forum to keep key stakeholders in the Waterfront and Wynyard Quarter abreast of various developments. A presentation from the Project Team was given to this group on the Projects timing, consenting and construction.

6.2 Breakfast Briefings (Two)

Derived from existing stakeholder databases held by Panuku, a personal invitation was extended to an initial briefing the 9 April 2019 at Grid AKL. Approximately 25 stakeholders attended and received a briefing on the Project. The format allowed for Q& A session which provide the Project Team with valuable feedback on hot topics for stakeholders.

5

A follow up session was held on the 6 June. This session focused on the issues raised in the April session and the Project team included subject matter experts presenting on the key issues. Approximately 10 stakeholders attended. Again, a Q& A session allowed for stakeholders to ask any questions of the wider Project Team.

6.3 Drop in events (Three)

During April three drop in events for the general public were held at Panuku’s Kiosk at Karanga Plaza in Wynyard Quarter. A display was set up and the events were widely advertised. This was an opportunity for workers in the area and the general public to come and find out more about the project and have questions and queries answered by the Project Team. Approximately 60 people interacted with the Project Team over the 3 days.

The Kiosk permanent staff were also briefed to able them to answer any general queries on the project and they were supported by FAQ and access to the wider team. The kiosk is open 7 days a week so is a perfect information hub for projects in the Waterfront.

7 Key issues

7.1 Key issues

The engagement with stakeholders and the general public has raised some common themes and issues which will be addressed by the various technical experts in the Assessment of Environmental Effects (AEE). Some of these issues include:

• Duration of bridge to open and close (moving mechanism vs clearing people duration) • Priority to marine vessels for bridge openings • Lack of early mana whenua engagement on design and form • Preference for a separation of cyclists from pedestrians on the bridge • Bridge width ability to cater for future demand • Back up mechanism to open bridge in the event of failure • Construction duration and footprint • Provision for multi-modal transport (raised by one stakeholder) • Wind speeds limit for bridge openings • Temporary crossing operation and access • Provisions for universal access • Construction noise and vibration

The AEE and proposed conditions, supported by various technical expert reports will address the concerns raised above.

8 Engagement Outcomes

8.1 Summary of Outcomes

1. The one on one engagement with stakeholders and feedback received has allowed the project team to respond to concerns and issues where possible, incorporating these into the proposal. Bridge operations - it can be confirmed that the new bridge will operate in same manner as currently, so no change to current experience for users, with the bonus of a quicker opening and closing time.

6

2. Bridge capacity- Technical work completed on bridge capacity has confirmed that the proposed width will be adequate for predicted pedestrian and cyclist demand.

3. Pedestrian and Cyclist segregation on the bridge - Separation issues have been considered as part of the Transport Assessment and is addressed in that report.

4. Universal access - The proposal has taken into account provisions for universal access and it considered the new bridge will comply with the required standards.

5. Bridge Failure - Redundancy has been built into the design to allow for a backup mechanism in the event of failure.

6. Temporary Crossing - The temporary crossing will provide access during construction and alternative routes will be well sign posted. Hours of operation reflect feedback from users in the area requesting a 6am -12pm opening.

7. Construction Noise - Construction noise and vibration will comply with the standards set by the AC36 conditions, which are more stringent that the Auckland Unitary Plan.

8. Wind speeds - The bridge has been designed to withstand winds up to 110 kmh.

9 Project Communications

The project has developed some project comms including a short animation of the bridge that has assisted in engaging with stakeholders. This involves the opening motion of the bridge provides a clear visualization of the proposed design and can be viewed here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epydPvBEXSo.

10 Conclusion

Consultation for the project will be ongoing post the submission period to attempt to resolve issues prior to the Environment Court hearing. This includes briefings with individual stakeholders and breakfast briefings to the stakeholders collectively

Panuku will continue to engage with mana whenua and stakeholders though to the completion of the permanent bridge.

7

Appendix 1: Stakeholder Consultation Log

1 Stakeholder Consultation Summary as at 11 June 2019

Date Persons/Organisation Purpose Attendees Key Discussion /Outcome /Actions AUCKLAND COUNCIL 28/3/19 Auckland Transport - Luke Overview of WX bridge replacement Will Brown Douglas Nico Elsen, Paul Nicol, Discussion/feedback: Donald, Ina Stenzel, Daniel • Requirement for replacement Gyles Bendall, Imogen Schoots 1. Broader feeder cycle network Newcombe • Bridge options assessment 2. Priority routes and how Skypath and other cycle ways will feed into the crossing

• Alignment confirmation 3. Brief discussion on cyclist management, bridge operations around: • Constraints a. Stage gate opening to create flow b. Larger apron area for flow management c. Developing a management strategy for cyclists at the front of the queue

4. Design condition for speed of operation 5. Consent will require capacity review and statement of design

Auckland Transport – pre application meeting 6/5/19 AT Capital Projects Imogen Schoots & Will Brown Douglas No imminent accessibility concern was raised on the concept design. The design team is Accessibility Group (CPAG) encouraged to present detailed design to review for any accessibility issues. Elected Reps and Local Boards 12/2/19 Waitematā Local Board Overall waterfront update - Initial advice of project Paul Koller, Theresa Walsh commencement 1/4/19 Waitematā Local Board – Memo giving advance notice on announcement and Boards Theresa Walsh decisions 15/4/19 Clr Darby – briefing Advanced briefing prior to public announcement – covering Allan Young, Rod Marler, Imogen S process, design and timing Elected reps Memo to wider Council group 9/4/19 Waitematā Local Board Presentation to Local Board members on the project, process, Imogen S, Theresa Walsh Positive feedback, questions on design and mechanisms, xxx design, engagement and timing 17/4/19 Auckland City Centre Provide a project overview and seek any feedback Gyles Bendall, Fiona Knox, Theresa walsh Overall support from ACCAB, some discussion regarding width and future proofing. Advisory Board (ACCAB) Complimentary comments on design. No further action required. Resolution number CEN/2019/16 MOVED by Mr G Cohen, seconded by Mr GC Crawford: That the Auckland City Centre Advisory Board: a) receive the overview of the proposed Wynyard Crossing bridge replacement project and timing. b) note support for the project.

4 June 2019 Auckland Council Planning To update committee on Resource consent application Vrinda Moghe Committee OTHER STAKEHOLDERS 20/3/19 VHHL – Angela Bull One on one meeting to discuss key issues and any potential Katelyn Orton, Imogen Schoots impacts on VHLLs operations Date Persons/Organisation Purpose Attendees Key Discussion /Outcome /Actions 26/3/19 Email to Gold stakeholders Early heads up and offer to meet Theresa Walsh 27/3/19 Richard Aitken – Fuh Wha One on one meeting to discuss key issues and any potential Katelyn Orton, Imogen S Hyatt need to manage guest experience – pontoon experience to be an experience in itself. impacts on Hyatt Interested in resource Consent timing and process. Interested in hours of operation expect standard – most concern around construction period.

1/4/19 Email to Silver and Bronze Project overview and invite to briefing Theresa walsh stakeholders 3/4/19 Bile Auckland – Barbara Gyles Bendall, Niko Elsen, Bridget Law, Imogen Cuthbert, Max Robitzsch Schoots, Paul Buckle 4/4/19 ETNZ – Andy Nottage, Kevin Shoebridge, Richard Meacham 8/4/19 RNYS – Hayden Porter One on one meeting to cover project overview and any Katelyn Orton, Imogen Schoots noted an ambitious programme with a lot to deliver in a short space of time (HP). potential impacts on RNYS *frequency of openings queried if changing (HP) *noted ECI process underway and the need to construct in such a short time frame (IS) *noted many demands to balance given the array of functions that the bridge needs to serve (IS)

12/4/19 Explorer Group – William One on one meeting to cover project overview and any Theresa Walsh, Imogen Schoots Positive conversation re operations and being a “good neighbour”. Provided information Goodfellow potential impacts on Explorers activities on earlier barge operated by Explore. Discussed wind and operating xx Winds – currently operate up to 50 knots (love a good wind) 60mph max comfort. No recollection of ever too windy to go out or that bridge stayed down due to winds.

Return times vary –

Tenant to VHHL – flexible in terms of openings. Wants to be a good neighbour.

17/4/19 Wynyard Quarter TMA Presentation to regular Board meeting – project overview, Fiona Knox, Imogen Schoots Focus on width and separation issues for cyclists, priority and timing of opening, shelter process and timing 6/5/19 VHHL- Angela Bull, John Further project update Katelyn Orton, Vrinda Moghe, Will Brown Took VHLL through consenting process, team and timing - VM – issue consenting timeline White, Daniel Scott Douglas, Rod Marler to VHHL Covered design – details of length and height, design brief is that the new bridge will need to open at the same speed or quicker than the existing. Timing is still being developed, likely to be 1.5-2minutes. Construction – advice on ECI. VHHL queried the requirement for the temporary crossing based on cost, operational parameters, noise. Panuku understand this view and will likely work with stakeholders on an appropriate solution that may be based on limited time of operation Keep VHHL updated on construction - further meeting fortnight time

15/5/19 Fu Wa/Park Hyatt – Further project update Vrinda Moghe, Will Brown Douglas, Imogen Key concern: Richard Atkin Schoots Construction noise and vibration monitoring on the building. 16/5/19 Email to Puneet Dhal Query Clarifying issues regarding bridge purpose (ped/cyclists), Panuku’s technical experts’ role 16/5/19 Email to Noleen Buckland Query Clarifying consultation and timing on behalf of CCR&R 16/5/2019 ASB – Bernard Trevor, Further project update Vrinda Moghe, Will Brown Douglas, Imogen Key concerns- Cathy Wendt Schoots • Priority for boats arrangement ATC - Geeling Ching • Temporary crossing Date Persons/Organisation Purpose Attendees Key Discussion /Outcome /Actions • Separation for cyclist, e-scooters and pedestrians • Weather protection on/around the bridge approaches for people waiting while the bridge is in open position for boat access Would like briefing one on one basis for updates and invites for the second breakfast meeting. 17/5/2019 Panuku – VHHL Further project update John Matla, John White, Will Brown Douglas Panuku to detail on temporary crossing Waterspace committee 22/5/19 Fu Wa Site visit and discussion on Noise issues Vrinda Moghe, Matthew Twose, Maria Walker, Update on noise report provided. Panuku to send a briefing memo and updated drawings. Bridget Law, Imogen Schoots, Will Brown Douglas 23/5/19 Vector Project brief and discussion on relocation of transformer on Te Panuku to provide Vector on the preferred location of the transformer Wero Island 28/5/19 ETNZ Follow up meeting on – construction area, noise issues Panuku to send a briefing memo and updated drawings 27/5/19 Department of Briefing on the project. Update on bridge ramp occupying the DoC to provide an affected party approval. conservation conservation covenant. 28/5/19 VHHL – Waterspace Further project update John Matla, John White, Will Brown Douglas Panuku to circulate prelim design report to address concerns over redundancy in design.c committee Vrinda Moghe, Daniel Scott VHHL to provide comments on behalf of marina users on proposed bridge and temporary crossing.

29/5/19 Project briefing via email Vrinda Moghe POAL to provide an affected party approval – Received – 5 June 2019 30/5/19 Jef Grobben Project briefing Katelyn Orton, Vrinda Moghe, Imogen Schoots, Panuku to provide - Will Brown Douglas, Waiata Groot 1. Copy of Waterfront Plan to Jeff 2. 2017 report (minutes) to Jeff – including any other 2014 Peer review reports 3. Options analysis report relating to other alignments for public transport 4. Any information to Jeff that has been sent to Puneet D. 5/6/19 CCRG – N Buckland Email query re mana whenua input and timing Responded with reference to mana whenua inputs MULTI-STAKEHOLDER EVENTS 21/3/19 Developers Collaboration Paula Koller, Imogen Schoots Width, current alignment and why chose. View that behaviour changes needs Mtg – variety of attendees Visual apron overlay to show the difference. Pontoons – difficult but what is needed to be able to construct it Operating model not changing. Light rail not happening – which modes of transport

9/04/2019 Key Stakeholders (approx. Wider invite to stakeholder Project Team – presentation by Imogen A breakfast briefing to stakeholders on the project, design and timing. Q& A session 25) Schoots covering key issues such as width, opening hours, priority and xx

13/04/2019 Wider advertising through Public drop in event. Theresa Walsh, Vrinda Moghe Understanding of the project and feedback on matters of concern to local residents and 3 sessions – a number of Panuku Purpose to provide information on the project and to discuss businesses. Questions re timing of construction and operation. day and channels – approximately any potential impacts. evening 60 interactions with members of the public 6 June 2019 Key Stakeholders (approx. Follow up meeting B’fast briefing Project Team – presentation by Imogen Second breakfast briefing to stakeholders on the project, design and timing 10) Schoots, Will Brown Douglas, Vrinda Moghe, Todd Langwell, Vijay Lala