Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 24, 2019 / Notices 35601

We intend to issue assessment protective orders (APO) of their DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE instructions directly to CBP 15 days responsibility concerning the return or after publication of the final results of destruction of proprietary information International Trade Administration this review. disclosed under APO in accordance [A–570–831] Cash Deposit Requirements with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business Fresh Garlic From the People’s The following cash deposit proprietary information in this segment Republic of : Final Results of the requirements will be effective upon of the proceeding. Timely written 23rd Antidumping Duty Administrative publication of the notice of final results Review; 2016–2017 of administrative review for all notification of the return/destruction of shipments of subject merchandise APO materials, or conversion to judicial AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, protective order, is hereby requested. International Trade Administration, for consumption on or after the Failure to comply with the regulations Department of Commerce. publication of the final results of this and the terms of an APO is a SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce administrative review, as provided by sanctionable violation. (Commerce) determines that Jinxiang Zhengyang Import & Export section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The Notice to Interested Parties cash deposit rate for respondents noted Co., Ltd. (Zhengyang) made sales of above will be the rate established in the We are issuing and publishing this fresh garlic from the People’s Republic final results of this administrative notice in accordance with sections of China (China) at less than normal review, except if the rate is less than 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 value during the period of review (POR) 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis CFR 351.221. November 1, 2016 through October 31, within the meaning of 19 CFR 2017. Commerce finds that 351.106(c)(I), in which case the cash Dated: July 16, 2019. Sea-line International Trading Co., Ltd. deposit rate will be zero; (2) for Jeffrey I. Kessler, (Sea-line) withheld requested merchandise exported by producers or Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and information, significantly impeded the exporters not covered in this Compliance. review, and did not cooperate to the administrative review but covered in a best of its ability. Accordingly, pursuant prior segment of the proceeding, the Appendix to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff cash deposit rate will continue to be the List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), we company-specific rate published for the and Decision Memorandum are relying on adverse facts available. most recently completed segment of this I. Summary These determinations and the final proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a II. Background dumping margins are discussed below firm covered in this review, a prior III. Scope of the Order in the ‘‘Final Results’’ section of this review, or the original less-than-fair- IV. Changes Made Since the Preliminary notice. value (LTFV) investigation, but the Results DATES: Applicable July 24, 2019. producer is, the cash deposit rate will be V. Discussion of the Issues FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the rate established for the most recently General Issue Kathryn Wallace or Alexander Cipolla, completed segment of this proceeding Comment 1: Whether ArcelorMittal Celaya AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, for the producer of the subject Should be Included in the Liquidation Enforcement and Compliance, merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit Instructions International Trade Administration, rate for all other producers or exporters Deacero Issues U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 will continue to be 20.58 percent, the Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, all-others rate established in the LTFV Continue to Apply Partial AFA to DC 20230; telephone: 202–482–6251 or investigation.11 These cash deposit Deacero for Not Reporting Downstream 202–482–4956, respectively. requirements, when imposed, shall Resales of Rebar Made by Its Home SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: remain in effect until further notice. Market Affiliate Notification to Importers Comment 3: Whether Commerce Properly Background Accounted for Deacero’s Non-Prime Commerce published the preliminary This notice also serves as a final Sales reminder to importers of their results of this administrative review of Comment 4: Whether Commerce the antidumping duty order on fresh responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) Mistakenly Performed the Arm’s-Length to file a certificate regarding the garlic from China on December 10, Test on Deacero Sales 1 reimbursement of antidumping duties 2018. We preliminarily found that the Grupo Simec Issues mandatory respondents, Zhengyang and prior to liquidation of the relevant Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Sea-line, sold subject merchandise to entries during the POR. Failure to Continue Collapsing Sigosa with AEST the United States at less than normal comply with this requirement could and FUNACE value. Furthermore, we found that two result in Commerce’s presumption that Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should companies certified that they made no reimbursement of antidumping duties Correct an Error in Grupo Simec’s occurred and the subsequent assessment Margin Calculation Program shipments during the POR and that six of doubled antidumping duties. VI. Recommendation companies, in addition to the mandatory respondents, qualified for Administrative Protective Order [FR Doc. 2019–15743 Filed 7–23–19; 8:45 am] separate rate status. This notice also serves as a reminder BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Commerce exercised its discretion to to parties subject to administrative toll all deadlines affected by the partial federal government closure from 11 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 1 See Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of Fair Value and Final Affirmative Determination of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Critical Circumstances, 79 FR 54967 (September 15, Administrative Review; 2016–2017, 83 FR 63479 2014). (December 10, 2018) (Preliminary Results).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Jul 23, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM 24JYN1 khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES 35602 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 24, 2019 / Notices

December 22, 2018 through the prepared or preserved by the addition of enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed resumption of operations on January 29, other ingredients or heat processing. and electronic versions of the Issues and 2019.2 If the new deadline falls on a The differences between grades are Decision Memorandum are identical in non-business day, in accordance with based on color, size, sheathing, and content. Commerce’s practice, the deadline will level of decay. The scope of the order Preliminary become the next business day. The does not include the following: (a) Changes Since the Results revised deadline for the final results was Garlic that has been mechanically tolled to May 20, 2019. harvested and that is primarily, but not Based on a review of the record and Between March 8 and March 11, 2019, exclusively, destined for non-fresh use; comments received from interested Zhengyang, Sea-line, and the or (b) garlic that has been specially parties regarding our Preliminary petitioners 3 submitted their respective prepared and cultivated prior to Results, and for the reasons explained in case briefs.4 On March 14, 2019, in planting and then harvested and the Issues and Decision Memorandum, response to requests from the otherwise prepared for use as seed. The we have applied facts available with an petitioners 5 and Sea-line,6 we extended subject merchandise is used principally adverse inference to Sea-line. As such, the deadline for interested parties to as a food product and for seasoning. The and as described below, we have revised submit rebuttal briefs by five days.7 On subject garlic is currently classifiable the margin assigned to the separate rate March 20, 2019, Sea-line and the under subheadings: 0703.20.0000, respondents. petitioners submitted rebuttal briefs.8 0703.20.0005, 0703.20.0010, Final Determination of No Shipments On May 10, 2019, Commerce 0703.20.0015, 0703.20.0020, extended the deadlines for the final 0703.20.0090, 0710.80.7060, In the Preliminary Results, Commerce results of this administrative review 0710.80.9750, 0711.90.6000, determined that the QTF-Entity 12 and from 120 days to 180 days after the 0711.90.6500, 2005.90.9500, Shengtai Fruits & Vegetables Co., publication of the Preliminary Results. 2005.90.9700, 2005.99.9700, of the Ltd. each had no shipments during the The new deadline is now July 18, 2019.9 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the POR.13 As we have not received any 10 Scope of the Order United States (HTSUS). information to contradict our Although the HTSUS subheadings are preliminary findings, we determine that The products covered by the order are provided for convenience and customs these entities did not have any all grades of garlic, whole or separated purposes, our written description of the shipments of subject merchandise into constituent cloves, whether or not scope of the order is dispositive. In during the POR. peeled, fresh, chilled, frozen, water or order to be excluded from the order, other neutral substance, but not garlic entered under the HTSUS China-Wide Entity subheadings listed above that is (1) As discussed in the Preliminary 2 See Memorandum to the Record from Gary mechanically harvested and primarily, Results, the China-wide entity will not Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, but not exclusively, destined for non- be under review unless a party performing the non-exclusive functions and duties fresh use or (2) specially prepared and specifically requests, or Commerce self- of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and cultivated prior to planting and then initiates, a review of the entity.14 Compliance, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Partia1 harvested and otherwise prepared for Because no party requested a review of Shutdown of the Federal Government,’’ dated January 28, 2019. All deadlines in this segment of use as seed must be accompanied by the China-wide entity, the entity is not the proceeding have been extended by 40 days. declarations to U.S. Customs and Border under review and the entity’s rate (i.e., 3 The petitioners are the Fresh Garlic Producers Protection (CBP) to that effect. $4.71 per-kilogram (kg)) is not subject to Association and its individual members: Analysis of Comments Received change. Aside from the no-shipment Christopher Ranch L.L.C.; The Garlic Company; and companies discussed above, Commerce Valley Garlic. All issues raised in the case and 4 See Zhengyang’s Letter, ‘‘Fresh Garlic from the considers all other companies for which People’s Republic of China—Case Brief,’’ dated rebuttal briefs are addressed in the a review was requested, and which did March 8, 2019; see also Sea-line’s Letter, ‘‘Fresh accompanying Issues and Decision not qualify for a separate rate, to be part Garlic from the PRC: Case Brief of Qingdao Sea-line Memorandum.11 The issues are of the China-wide entity. A list of the International Trading Co., Ltd.,’’ dated March 8, identified in Appendix I to this notice. companies determined to be part of the 2019; Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Fresh Garlic from the The Issues and Decision Memorandum People’s Republic of China: Petitioners’ Case Brief,’’ China-wide entity is provided in dated March 11, 2019. is a public document and is on file Appendix III to this notice. 5 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘23rd Administrative electronically via Enforcement and Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Fresh Compliance’s Antidumping and Separate Rates Garlic from the People’s Republic of China— Countervailing Duty Centralized Petitioners’ Request for Extension of deadline for In the Preliminary Results, in Submission of Rebuttal Case Briefs,’’ dated March Electronic Service System (ACCESS). accordance with section 777A(c)(2)(B) 12, 2019. ACCESS is available to registered users 6 See Sea-line’s Letter, ‘‘Fresh Garlic from the at http://access.trade.gov and in the 12 The QTF-Entity includes Qingdao Lianghe PRC: Extension Request for Submission of Rebuttal Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the International Trade Co., Ltd. (Lianghe); Qingdao Brief on Behalf of Qingdao Sea-Line International main Commerce building. In addition, a Xintianfeng Foods Co., Ltd. (QXF); Qingdao Trading Co., Ltd.,’’ dated March 14, 2019. complete version of the Issues and Tiantaixing Foods Co., Ltd. (QTF); Qingdao 7 See Memorandum, ‘‘23rd Administrative Tianhefeng Foods Co., Ltd. (QTHF); Qingdao Review of Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic Decision Memorandum can be accessed Beixing Trading Co., Ltd. (QBT); Hebei Golden Bird of China: Extension of Rebuttal Briefing Schedule,’’ directly on the internet at http:// Trading Co., Ltd.; and Huamei Consulting. See dated March 14, 2019. Memorandum, ‘‘23rd Administrative Review of the 8 See Sea-line’s Letter, ‘‘Fresh Garlic from the 10 See Antidumping Duty Order: Fresh Garlic Antidumping Duty Order on Fresh Garlic from the PRC: Rebuttal Brief of Qingdao Sea-line from the People’s Republic of China, 59 FR 59209 People’s Republic of China: Status of the QTF- International Trading Co., Ltd.,’’ dated May 20, (November 16, 1994). Entity,’’ dated October 22, 2018, at Attachment. 2019; see also Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Fresh Garlic from 11 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 13 See Preliminary Results, 83 FR at 63480–82. the People’s Republic of China: Petitioners’ Rebuttal Memorandum for the Final Results of the 14 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement Brief,’’ dated March 20, 2019. Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Fresh of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 9 See Memorandum, ‘‘Fresh Garlic from the Garlic from the People’s Republic of China; 2016– Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and People’s Republic of China—23rd Administrative 2017,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Review: Extension of Deadline for the Final Results adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 of Review,’’ dated May 10, 2019. Memorandum) at ‘‘Discussion of the Issues.’’ FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Jul 23, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM 24JYN1 khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 24, 2019 / Notices 35603

of the Act, Commerce employed a where Commerce limited its facts available in investigations. In these limited examination methodology, as examination in an administrative review final results of review, we calculated a we determined that it would not be pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the weighted-average dumping margin for practicable to examine individually all Act. Commerce’s practice in cases Zhengyang, but based Sea-line’s margin companies for which a review request involving limited selection based on on facts available. As Zhengyang’s was made.15 There were six exporters of exporters accounting for the largest margin is the only margin that is not subject merchandise from China that volume of imports has been to look to either de minimis or based entirely on demonstrated their eligibility for a section 735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance, adverse facts available, we have separate rate but were not selected for which provides instructions for assigned Zhengyang’s margin to the individual examination in this review. calculating the all-others rate in an separate rate respondents. These six exporters are listed in investigation. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Final Results of Review Appendix II. Act instructs Commerce to base an all- Neither the Act nor Commerce’s others rate on the rates established for Commerce finds that the following regulations address the establishment of individually investigated producers and weighted-average dumping margins the rate applied to individual exporters, excluding any rates that are exist for the period November 1, 2016 companies not selected for examination zero, de minimis, or based entirely on through October 31, 2017:

Weighted-average Exporter dumping margin (dollars per-kg)

Shandong Jinxiang Zhengyang Import & Export Co., Ltd ...... 2.87 Qingdao Sea-line International Trading Co., Ltd ...... 4.71 Yuanxiang Industry & Commerce Co., Ltd ...... 2.87 Jining Alpha Food Co., Ltd ...... 2.87 Qingdao Maycarrier Import & Export Co., Ltd ...... 2.87 Shandong Chenhe International Trading Co., Ltd ...... 2.87 Shandong Happy Foods Co., Ltd ...... 2.87 Hongqiao International Logistics Co., Ltd ...... 2.87

Assessment Rates U.S. price. The following cash deposit Disclosure Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) and requirements will be effective upon We intend to disclose the calculations (C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b), publication of these final results of this performed within five days of the date Commerce has determined, and CBP administrative review for shipments of of publication of this notice to parties in shall assess, antidumping duties on all the subject merchandise from China this proceeding in accordance with 19 appropriate entries of subject entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, CFR 351.224(b). merchandise in accordance with the for consumption on or after the Notification to Importers final results of this review. Commerce publication date of this notice, as intends to issue appropriate assessment provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the This notice also serves as a final instructions directly to CBP 15 days Act: (1) For the exporters listed above, reminder to importers of their after publication of this notice. the cash deposit rate will be equal to the responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) Pursuant to Commerce’s assessment weighted-average dumping margin to file a certificate regarding the practice in non-market economy (NME) established in the final results of this reimbursement of antidumping duties cases, for merchandise that was not review; (2) for previously investigated or prior to liquidation of the relevant reported in the U.S. sales databases reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese entries during this POR. Failure to submitted by an exporter individually exporters not listed above that have comply with this requirement could examined during this review, but that separate rates, the cash deposit rate will result in Commerce’s presumption that entered under the case number of that continue to be the exporter-specific rate reimbursement of antidumping duties exporter (i.e., at the individually- has occurred, and the subsequent published for the most recently examined exporter’s cash deposit rate), assessment of double antidumping completed segment of this proceeding; Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate duties. (3) for all Chinese exporters of subject such entries at the NME-wide rate. In merchandise which have not been Administrative Protective Order addition, if Commerce determines that an exporter under review had no found to be entitled to a separate rate, This notice serves as the only shipments of the subject merchandise, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for reminder to parties subject to any suspended entries that entered the China-wide entity (i.e., 4.71 dollars administrative protective order (APO) of under that exporter’s case number (i.e., per-kg); and (4) for all non-Chinese their responsibility concerning the at that exporter’s rate) will be liquidated exporters of subject merchandise that disposition of proprietary information at the NME-wide rate.16 have not received their own rate, the disclosed under APO in accordance cash deposit rate will be the rate with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which Cash Deposit Requirements applicable to the Chinese exporter that continues to govern business Commerce intends to instruct CBP to supplied that non-Chinese exporter. proprietary information in this segment require a cash deposit for antidumping These deposit requirements, when of the proceeding. Timely written duties equal to the weighted-average imposed, shall remain in effect until notification of return or destruction of margin by which normal value exceeds further notice. APO materials, or conversion to judicial

15 See Memorandum, ‘‘Selection of Respondents 16 For a full discussion of this practice, see Non- Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 for Individual Examination,’’ dated February 28, Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: (October 24, 2011). 2018.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Jul 23, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM 24JYN1 khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES 35604 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 24, 2019 / Notices

protective order, is hereby requested. 19. Qingdao Gabsan Trading Co., Ltd. (KORES).2 We did not receive any other Failure to comply with the regulations 20. Qingdao Jiashan Trading Co., Ltd. ministerial error comments or rebuttal and the terms of an APO is a 21. Qingdao Justop Industries and Trading comments. sanctionable violation. Co., Ltd. 22. Qingdao Ritai Food Co., Ltd. Scope of the Order Notification to Interested Parties 23. Shandong Galaxy International The merchandise covered by the order 24. Shandong Helu International Trade Co., We are issuing and publishing these Ltd. is certain hot-rolled steel flat products final results in accordance with sections 25. Shandong Lejianda Food Co., Ltd. from Korea. For a complete description 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 26. Victoria Foods Co., Ltd. of the scope of the order, see the Issues CFR 351.213. 27. Weifang Huashun Import & Export Co., and Decision Memorandum 3 Dated: July 18, 2019. Ltd. accompanying the Final Results. 28. Weifang Wangyuan Food Co., Ltd. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Ministerial Errors Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and [FR Doc. 2019–15745 Filed 7–23–19; 8:45 am] Compliance. BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f) define a ‘‘ministerial error’’ as Appendix I an error in addition, subtraction, or List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE other arithmetic function, clerical error Decision Memorandum resulting from inaccurate copying, International Trade Administration I. Summary duplication, or the like, and any other II. Background similar type of unintentional error III. Scope of the Order [C–580–884] which the Secretary considers IV. Final Determination of No Shipments ministerial. As discussed in the V. Use of Facts Available and Adverse Facts Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Amended Final Issues and Decision Available (AFA) Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From Memorandum, Commerce finds that the VI. Discussion of the Issues: the Republic of Korea: Amended Final error alleged by POSCO constitutes a Comment 1: Whether Sea-line Provided Results of the First Administrative ministerial error within the meaning of Reliable Sales Information to Calculate a Review 4 Dumping Margin 19 CFR 351.224(f). Specifically, Comment 2: Whether Romania is the Commerce made an error in the AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, calculation of the benefit to POSCO Appropriate Surrogate Country International Trade Administration, Comment 3: Whether Commerce Double- from POSCO’s KORES loans.5 Counted Chemicals in Sea-line’s U.S. Department of Commerce. In accordance with section 751(h) of Calculation SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), we are VII. Recommendation (Commerce) is amending the final amending the Final Results to correct results of the administrative review of Appendix II the ministerial error. Specifically, we the countervailing duty (CVD) order on are amending the net subsidy rate for List of Companies Receiving a Separate Rate certain hot-rolled steel flat products POSCO.6 The revised net subsidy rate is 1. Chengwu County Yuanxiang Industry & (hot-rolled steel) from the Republic of provided below. Commerce Co., Ltd. Korea (Korea) to correct a ministerial 2. Jining Alpha Food Co., Ltd. error. The period of review (POR) is Amended Final Results 3. Qingdao Maycarrier Import & Export Co., August 12, 2016 through December 31, Ltd. 2016. Subsidy rate 4. Shandong Chenhe International Trading Company (percent Co., Ltd. DATES: Applicable July 24, 2019. valorem) 7 5. Shandong Happy Foods Co., Ltd. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: POSCO ...... 0.54 6. Weifang Hongqiao International Logistics Hannah Falvey, AD/CVD Operations, Co., Ltd. Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 2 See POSCO’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Appendix III International Trade Administration, Flat Products from the Republic of Korea, 8/12/ U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 2016–12/31/2016 Administrative Review, Case No. List of Companies Not Receiving Separate C–580–884: POSCO’s Ministerial Error Allegation,’’ Rate Status Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4889. dated June 24, 2019. 1. Bestway Logistics Inc. 3 See Final Results and accompanying IDM. 2. Chengwu Yuanxiang Industry and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Allegation of Ministerial Commerce Co., Ltd. Background Errors in the Final Results of the First Antidumping 3. China Union Agri. (Qingdao) Co., Ltd. Duty Administrative Review of Certain Hot-Rolled 4. Richmond International In accordance with section 751(a)(1) Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea,’’ 5. Jiangyoung Gunagafa Vegetable dated concurrently with, and herby adopted by, this of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended notice (Amended Final Issues and Decision Professional Corperation (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5), on Memorandum). 6. Farmlady Trading Co., Ltd. June 19, 2019, Commerce published its 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Countervailing Duty 7. Jining City Billion Garlic Products Co., Ltd. final results of the administrative review Review of Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products 8. Jining New Silk Road Food Co., Ltd. from the Republic of Korea: Final Results 9. Jining Rich Farmer International of the CVD order of hot-rolled steel from Calculations for POSCO,’’ dated June 11, 2019. 1 10. Jining Yifa Garlic Produce Co., Ltd. Korea. On June 24, 2019, POSCO 6 Id. Because we relied on POSCO’s subsidy rates 11. Jining Yongjia Trade Co., Ltd. alleged a calculation error in these Final to calculate the rate for non-selected companies 12. Jinji Trade Co., Ltd. Results regarding POSCO’s policy loans under review, we are revising the calculation for 13. Jinxiang Hongyu Freezing & Storing Co., from the Korea Resources Corporation non-selected companies under review in these Ltd. amended final results. After this revision, the rate 14. Jinxiang Richfar Fruits & Vegetables Co., for non-selected companies is unchanged from the 1 See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Final Results. See Memorandum, ‘‘Countervailing Ltd. the Republic of Korea: Final Results of the Duty Administrative Review: Certain Hot-Rolled 15. Juxian Huateng Organic Ginger Co., Ltd. Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 2016, Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea; 16. Ever Green Food Co., Ltd. 84 FR 28461 (June 19, 2019) (Final Results), and Amended Final Results Rate Calculation for the 17. Lanling Xinxinyuan Food Co., Ltd. accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum Non-Selected Companies,’’ dated concurrently with 18. Pinacle Sourcing & Marketing, Ltd. (IDM). the amended final results.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Jul 23, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM 24JYN1 khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES